Next Article in Journal
Coated Mg Alloy Implants: A Spontaneous Wettability Transition Process with Excellent Antibacterial and Osteogenic Functions
Previous Article in Journal
Structural and Magnetic Characterization of Mechanically Alloyed (Fe2O3)1−x(Al2O3)x Solid Solutions via Pulsed Neutron Powder Diffraction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structure Formation and Properties of Activated Supersulfate Cement

1
Department of Building Elements Technology and Materials Science, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, 33028 Rivne, Ukraine
2
Chair of Building Materials Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Cracow, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(9), 1912; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18091912
Submission received: 18 March 2025 / Revised: 13 April 2025 / Accepted: 19 April 2025 / Published: 23 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Construction and Building Materials)

Abstract

:
The article investigates the characteristics of the phase composition and structure of supersulfated cement (SSC) during hardening using X-ray, electron microscopy, and ultrasonic analysis methods. The influence of different types of activators, hardening accelerators, and superplasticizers on the type and morphology of the newly formed phases during SSC hardening was studied. The effect of a polycarboxylate-type superplasticizer and calcium chloride on the standard consistency and setting times of SSC was experimentally determined. It was established that the introduction of the superplasticizer reduces the standard consistency by 10–16%. Experimental data showed higher effectiveness of phosphogypsum as a sulfate activator compared to gypsum stone. The strength increase of SSC at 7 days reached up to 35%, and at 28 days, up to 15%. Based on the kinetics of ultrasonic wave propagation during SSC hardening, the main stages of structure formation and the influence of cement composition on these stages were determined. The experimental results demonstrate the effect of SSC composition on its standard consistency, setting time, and mechanical properties. The impact of the type of activator and admixtures on the change in SSC strength during storage was investigated. It was found that the addition of a polycarboxylate-type superplasticizer significantly reduces the strength loss of SSC during long-term storage. Using mathematical modeling, experimentally obtained statistical models of strength were developed, which allow for the quantitative evaluation of individual and combined effects, as well as the determination of optimal SSC compositions.

1. Introduction

At the current stage of development in the construction industry, the use of concretes and mortars based on clinker-free or low-clinker binders is relevant for both economic and environmental reasons [1]. Such binders include supersulfated cements (SSC), which are produced from ground-granulated blast furnace slag with the addition of sulfate and alkaline activators [2,3].
The method for obtaining a binder from blast furnace slag and gypsum was first proposed in 1908 by H. Kühl [4]. According to the patent he obtained, binders can be produced based on blast furnace slag with the addition of at least 2% gypsum. The technology for such binders, which later became known as SSC, was further developed by a large group of researchers [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] who proposed the use of an alkaline activator–hydrated lime or Portland cement—along with gypsum, either through co-grinding the components or separate grinding followed by mixing. It was also established [12] that acidic blast furnace slags with a high content of SiO2 and Al2O3 and a low content of CaO are preferable for producing SSC. The compressive strength of the resulting binders at 28 days ranged from 15 to 30 MPa.
The composition and properties of modern SSC are standardized by EN 15743:2010 [13]. In accordance with this standard, the composition of SSC includes blast furnace granulated slag (≥75%), calcium sulfate (5 ≤ CS < 20%), Portland cement clinker (0 ≤ K < 5) and other additives (0 ≤ A ≤ 5%)
The mechanical and physical parameters standardized by EN 15743:2010 for SSC are presented in Table 1.
Concretes and mortars based on SSC have both advantages and disadvantages. Positive features of SSCs include their enhanced resistance in marine and sulfate environments, lactic and humic acids, and linseed oil. SSCs are characterized by relatively low heat of hydration, which makes them suitable for use in massive structures with high crack resistance. However, SSC is not recommended for use in structures exposed to alternating wetting and drying conditions, to avoid the formation of a brittle and weak surface layer, nor for concreting at low temperatures. During hardening, it is recommended that SSC-based concrete and reinforced concrete structures be kept moist for the first 2–3 weeks [14,15,16,17].
A number of studies [18,19,20,21] have focused on increasing the early strength of SSC-based concretes. The Al2O3 content in the slag has been found to be of particular importance. Slags with low alumina content require more active alkaline activation. The magnesium oxide content in the slag also plays a significant role.
The strength of SSC significantly depends on the type and amount of activating components. According to Zhou et al. [22], the amount of alkali activator generally has a more substantial influence on the hydration and strength development of SSC compared to the anhydrite content. Nguyen et al. [23] also investigated the addition of supplementary cementitious materials, such as fly ash, as an activator. The study demonstrated increased strength with fly ash content rising from 10% to 30%, which was attributed to the higher presence of alumina and the associated calcium aluminosilicate hydrates (CASH) gel formation. Moreover, when fly ash was incorporated alongside SSC replacement in the range of 15% to 50%, the initial mechanical strength of concrete was lower than that of Portland cement concrete.
Qi et al. investigated the potential enhancement of SSC by adding calcium aluminate, carbide slag, and anhydrite as activators to overcome its slow early strength development [24]. The influence of different proportions of calcium aluminate and carbide slag on SSC’s mechanical properties and hydration mechanism was examined. The results showed that using 1% calcium aluminate and 4% carbide slag as alkali activators effectively activated slag hydration in SSC, achieving a compressive strength of 9.7 MPa after 1 day.
Another study conducted by Du et al. [25] examined SSC based on solid sulfate-containing waste generated during the production of electrolytic manganese. The results indicated that, under the combined effect of cement and calcium oxide, such waste effectively activated ground-granulated blast furnace slag. The main hydration products of SSC were ettringite and calcium silicate hydrate, which contributed to the mechanical strength of composites.
Gruskovnjak et al. found that the early compressive strength of SSC using low-reactivity slag could not be improved simply by adding stoichiometric amounts of the components used to form a specific hydration product [26]. Increasing the internal dissolution rate is the best way to enhance early compressive strength.
The analysis of previous studies highlights the need for further investigation into the processes of structure formation and the properties of SSCs with different types of sulfate activators, and the additional introduction of hardening accelerators and superplasticizers. This study is aimed at exploring these issues. The purpose of the research is to identify potential reserves for improving the key properties of SSC.

2. Materials and Methods of Research

Granulated blast furnace slag, sulfate, and alkaline slag hardening activators, as well as additives, modifiers, hardening accelerators, and superplasticizer were used as materials for obtaining SSC. A grinding intensifier, propylene glycol, was used to increase the grinding fineness. The superplasticizer used was the additive Melflux® 2651 F, a highly effective superplasticizer based on a modified polycarboxylate ester, developed by BASF (Trostberg, Germany) (hereinafter referred to as PCE).
Granulated blast furnace slag. The GBFS, typical in composition for Ukrainian metallurgy slag of the Kryvyi Rih Metallurgical Combine, was used in our studies. The chemical composition of the slag is presented in Table 2.
Slag basicity modulus Mb:
M b = C a O + M g O S i O 2 + A l 2 O 3 = 47.19 + 3.12 39.51 + 6.47 = 50 47.6 = 1.09
Slag activity module Ma:
M a = A l 2 O 3 S i O 2 = 6.47 39.51 = 0.16
According to the values of the activity module, slag can be attributed to the base ones with relatively low hydraulic activity [12].
The glass phase content in the slag ranged from 75% to 80%. In general, the values of Mb, Ma, and the glass phase content indicate the high hydraulic activity of GBFS. The alumina (Al2O3) content in the BFSC was 6.47%, significantly lower than the recommended content for SSC [27].
Sulfate activators. Gypsum stone and waste phosphogypsum served as sulfate activators, the chemical composition of which is given in Table 3.
For studies of sulfate activation of granulated blast furnace slags, phosphogypsum from «Rivne-Azot» (Ukraine) of long-term storage (over 10 years in dumps) was used, in which, due to natural purification processes (rain, melting snow), the content of water-soluble phosphates does not exceed 0.15%, and the content of fluorites is less than 0.4%. Such dump phosphogypsum, according to DSTU B V.2.7-2-93 (Ukrainian standard), can be attributed to conditioned PG. Before use for the manufacture of SSC, phosphogypsum was neutralized with lime milk (based on 3 wt. % CaO) with subsequent aging (storage) for 3 days and then drying at a temperature from 60 to 80 °C.
The specific surface area of phosphogypsum for different samples ranged from 260 to 330 m2/kg, according to Blaine’s method. The results of sedimentation analysis showed the material’s polydispersity with a predominant content of grains of the fraction 0.1–0.4 mm.
Portland cement was used as an alkaline activator. Portland cement CEM I 42.5 with the chemical and mineralogical composition of clinker, %—CaO, 66.25; SiO2, 22.38; Al2O3, 5.26; MgO, 0.63; Na2Oe, 0.21; C3S, 57.09; C2S, 21.22; C3A, 6.86; and C4AF, 12.20—was used for the research.
The main technical properties of Portland cement are as follows: specific surface area Blaine’s method, 305 m2/kg; standard consistency, 26.4%; setting time (hours and minutes): initial, 1–55, final, 3–25; standard strength, MPa after 28 days; bending, 6.8; compression, 51.7.
The compressive strength of mortars was determined using the standard methods according to EN 1015-11 [28]. The results obtained showed a high homogeneity of the feature analyzed. Each time, a set of three/six measurements was analyzed for homogeneity. Partial results that differed from the average by more than 10% were eliminated. An additional measurement was then taken, followed by another homogeneity verification. This process was repeated until the homogeneity of the set of results across the sample series was within ±10% of the mean value.
Experiment planning was mathematically performed using three-level plan B3 [29,30].
This method allows experiments to be conducted using an optimal design matrix and statistical processing of test results to obtain accurate experimental–statistical models in the form of polynomial dependencies, as shown in Formula (3).
y = b 0 + i = 1 k b i x i + i = 1 k b i i x i 2 + i , j = 1 k b i j x i x j ,
where
y is the initial parameter;
b0, bi, bii, and bij are the regression coefficients;
xi and xij are the investigated factors;
k is the number of factors.
The regression coefficient values provide information regarding the effect of appropriate factors on the initial parameter or property.
The algebraically calculated quantitative assessments of the coefficients of the equations were subjected to statistical analysis [30]. At the first stage of regression analysis, the standard deviation of the initial parameter and mean quadratic errors of models’ estimation coefficients are obtained. The coefficients are valuable if the design value of the Student’s t criterion is more than the given one. If a coefficient is not important, it can be omitted without re-calculating other coefficients. After the importance of the coefficients is estimated, the equation’s adequacy is checked by calculating the adequacy dispersion, the design value of Fischer’s criterion (F criterion) (Fc), and comparing the last with a given one. The given value of the F criterion (Ft) is obtained depending on the confidence probability (importance level) of 95% and the number of degrees of freedom. The equation is adequate for the given probability level if Fc > Ft.
Based on the results obtained, regression equations and graphical relationships were constructed, both two-dimensional and three-dimensional (response surfaces).
To study the structure changes of hardened SSC stone under the influence of modifier additives, X-ray phase analysis (DRON-3 diffractometer) and electron microscopic analysis were used. Using optical microscopy in transmitted and reflected light, we also studied the features of the structure formation of binders during the hardening process.
The specific surface area of the materials was investigated using the air permeability method on the Blaine apparatus.
The ultrasonic method was used to study the kinetics of the structure formation of the SSW over time [31]. The propagation velocity of ultrasonic waves (Vus) was determined on the UK-10P device at a frequency of 60 kHz by the following formula:
V u s = l t
where l is the sounding base (25 mm), and t is the time of ultrasound passage through the sample.

3. Results and Analysis of Test Results

3.1. Structure Formation of the SSC

To study the composition of hydrated SSC newly formed phases and the duration of hardening on them, X-ray phase studies of the hydration products of the binder were performed (Figure 1). The compositions used and the duration of storage of samples in the air are shown in Table 4.
All the above radiographs contain characteristic lines related to dihydrate gypsum CaSO4·2H2O, the low-sulfate form CASH 3CaO·Al2O3·CaSO4·12H2O and the high-sulfate form 3CaO·Al2O3·3CaSO4·32H2O (ettringite). Calcium hydrosilicates, tobermorite gel, due to X-ray amorphousness, are barely visible on radiographs.
The presence of lines of dihydrate gypsum, CaSO4·2H2O, in X-ray diffraction patterns 1 and 2 in Figure 1 indicates that even after 180 days of hardening, it was not entirely chemically bound into hydrosulfoaluminates. However, the intensity of the gypsum lines (7.56; 4.27; 3.79; 3.059 Å) significantly decreased, which indicates a decrease in its amount due to chemical binding into hydrosulfoaluminates during the hardening of SSC.
The lines characteristic of the low-sulfate form of CASH (8.92; 4.46; 3.99; 2.87; 2.45; 2.41; 1.82 Å) are more clearly distinguished in X-ray diffraction pattern No. 2, which indicates partial decomposition (recrystallization) of the high-sulfate form of CASH (9.73; 5.61; 4.69; 3.88; 2.564; 2.209; 2.154 Å) into the low-sulfate form during long-term storage of samples of hardened SSC, which, in general, coincides with the existing data [26].
Increasing the density of the hardened SSC and a certain change in the hydration conditions of the binder (compressed conditions) due to the use of the superplasticizer PCE, as well as intensification of structure formation due to the use of a hardening accelerator, CaCl2 (2%), led to a significant increase in the intensity of the lines of tobermorite-like calcium hydrosilicates (3.07; 2.80; 1.83; 1.67 Å) and a slight decrease in the intensity of the lines of hydrosulfoaluminates. Thus, a sharp increase in the strength of SSC when using superplasticizers is caused not only by a reduction of the porosity of the hardened stone but also by the rise in the proportion of tobermorite-like calcium hydrosilicates in the products of SSC hardening.
Increasing the content of phosphogypsum and gypsum stone from 10 to 20% led to an increase in the intensity of the lines of the content of chemically unbound dihydrate gypsum (7.56; 4.27; 3.79; 3.059 Å).
For comparison, the X-ray diffraction pattern 7 in Figure 1 presents the study results of the factory-made BFC closest in composition to SSC–BFC, which contains about 30% clinker, i.e., six times more than in SSC. A significant difference in this X-ray diffraction pattern is the presence in the binder of noticeable amounts of portlandite (4.93; 2.63; 1.93; 1.79 Å), which has not yet wholly bound into hydrosilicates after 7 days of hardening. In addition, this X-ray diffraction pattern contains lines of ettringite, hydrosilicates and dihydrate gypsum.
Electron microscopic studies were carried out using the replica method on a REMMA-101-02 electron microscope manufactured by SEMI with copper or graphite samples sputtering onto the chipped surface.
Comparison of electron microscopic images (Figure 2) of samples of hardened SSC (composition, wt.%: BFGS—85, FG—10, PC—5) after 7 and 180 days of hardening indicates an increase in the number of needle-shaped and prismatic ettringite crystals and a decrease in the content of plate-shaped crystals of dihydrate gypsum (prisms, elongated plates, intergrowths) on the chips of hardened SSC with an increase in the duration of hardening of the binder. At the same time, the disappearance of signs of the presence of portlandite is observed, for example, smooth surfaces and thin plates, which are clearly visible in samples that hardened for 7 days. Signs of the presence of monosulfoaluminate (slightly distorted hexagonal plates) can be seen in Figure 2(5). These results are in good agreement with the data of the X-ray phase analysis (Figure 1).
The use of superplasticizer PCE, as well as hardening accelerator—CaCl2 (2%)—(Figure 2(3)) in a certain way influenced the morphology of new formations of hardened SSC stone after 7 days. Prismatic structures are clearly visible, which can be attributed to dihydrate gypsum, as well as hydrosulfoaluminate.
Fibrous structures, which are clearly visible at 1000× magnification, probably indicate the presence of significant amounts of low-basic calcium hydrosilicates.
The increase in the content of phosphogypsum from 10 to 15% led to an increase in the signs of the content of chemically unbound dihydrate gypsum (prisms, elongated plates, intergrowths), which was noted above on the example of radiographs.
Replacing Portland cement with lime as an alkaline activator of SSC did not significantly change the morphology and composition of the bulk of the newly formed phases after 7 days.
Replacing phosphogypsum with ground gypsum stone in the same amount—10%—(Figure 2), resulted in the composition of the SSC hardening products that was practically the same as when using phosphogypsum, which indicates the similarity of the hardening processes in both cases. Increasing the duration of hardening of SSC of such a composition to 180 days had, in general, the same consequences as in the case of using phosphogypsum as a sulfate activator of increasing the number of prismatic crystals, which can be attributed to ettringite and, at the same time, the practical disappearance of signs of the presence of portlandite signs.
In the case of the composition of GBFS–water, even after long-term storage for 180 days under normal conditions (temperature 18–20 °C, humidity 90–100%), there are no noticeable signs of hydration hardening processes. Only an amorphous mass of slag glass with the inclusion of crystalline minerals, the total volume content of which does not exceed 10%, can be distinguished.
Electron microscopic studies of hardened BFC paste were also performed for comparison purposes. It can be noted that there are almost no noticeable signs of portlandite, and such crystalline newly formed phases as dihydrate gypsum and hydrosulfoaluminates are also barely noticeable (Figure 2(5)), which indicates fundamental differences in the processes of structure formation. Newly formed Portland slag cement and SSC phases are represented almost exclusively by jelly-like low-basic calcium hydrosilicates.
Using the ultrasonic pulse method, the propagation velocity of the leading edge of the ultrasonic wave (Vus, m/s) through the hardened stone SSC was determined. To measure the propagation time of ultrasound, through sounding was used, with the sensors installed on opposite sides of the material.
The nature of the curves of the change in the speed of ultrasound transmission (Figure 3) allows us to trace all the main stages of the formation of the structure of hardened stone SSC: the initial induction period, the period of growth and fusion of gel-like calcium hydrosilicates and the crystalline newly formed phases (hydrosulfoaluminates), and the period of final strengthening of the structure with subsequent recrystallization of newly formed phases. Analyzing the obtained curves, it should be noted that the end of the induction period (the transition of the horizontal section to the vertical) is clearly visible, which practically coincides with the time of the final SSC setting by Vicat. The final setting time of the SSC is associated with the material composition and the presence of additives used during mixing. The hardening time increases significantly when using a complex modifier additive (0.4% PCE + 2% CaCl2). The end point of hardening is the starting point; from it there is a rapid increase in the speed of ultrasound transmission, and, accordingly, the strength to certain constant values, which depend on the type of additive and W/C.
Among the SSC compositions with sulfate activator, phosphogypsum, the slowest structure formation is observed for SSC with an excess content of phosphogypsum (15%) (Figure 2(6)), which is characterized by the highest water demand of the dough (28%). Optimization of the FG content (10%) leads to a significant intensification of hardening, and reducing the water demand of SSC through the use of the superplasticizer PCE and the hardening accelerator CaCl2 contributed to achieving the highest ultrasound speed, and, accordingly, the strength of SSC.
The lowest strength, and, accordingly, the speed of ultrasound transmission through the hardening binder, are characteristic of SSC using gypsum stone as a sulfate activator, which is entirely consistent with the results of studies on the strength of SSC.
The graphs in Figure 3 clearly demonstrate that, during the first three days of hardening, most SSC compositions gain more than 50% of their strength, and after seven days of hardening, more than 65%. Subsequently, the strength of the samples increases quite slowly.

3.2. Main Properties of Activated SSC

Properties of the SSC were studied using the following sulfate and alkaline activators and admixtures: PCE and CaCl2.
For SSC without superplasticizer additives, the standard consistency (SC) [32] value is about 26%, and when using the superplasticizer PCE, it is significantly reduced. The introduction of the PCE additive slightly prolongs the start of setting and, at the same time, shortens the final setting time by reducing the water demand of SSC and the porosity of the hardened binder, and this effect is enhanced with increasing admixture consumption. The CaCl2 accelerator admixture shortens the terms of both the initial and final setting time (Table 5).
Adding 2% of the accelerator admixture CaCl2 into the composition of the SSC, even at W/C = 0.40, allowed the strength to increase to more than 51 MPa at 28 days. When the CaCl2 consumption was increased to 3%, the strength increased to more than 61 MPa. With the joint action of the additives CaCl2 (2%) and PCE at W/C = 0.35, the strength increased to more than 66 MPa.
An essential indicator of SSC’s construction and technological properties is preserving standard strength during long-term storage. It is known that even under favorable storage conditions, ordinary cements are affected by CO2 and water vapor contained in the air [27]. At the same time, hydrated compounds and CaCO3 are formed on the surface of cement particles, which leads to a significant decrease in cement strength.
In our experiments to study this phenomenon on low-alumina SSC, we used SSC of optimal composition without additives of accelerators and plasticizers with a standard strength of 35 MPa (composition, %: BFGS, 85, FG, 10, PC, 5; Sp. = 615 m2/kg), as well as SSC with additives PCE and CaCl2, and sand with Mf = 1.95. Samples measuring 40 × 40 × 160 mm with a binder-to-sand ratio of 1:3 were produced by molding on a laboratory vibrating platform with a vibration frequency of 3000 rpm and an amplitude of 0.35 mm for a vibration duration of 3 min. Samples were produced from the binder obtained immediately after manufacturing (grinding), after 2–3 h, and after 30, 90 and 180 days. The manufactured beam samples were kept under normal conditions (temperature 18–20°C, humidity 90–100%) before testing for compressive strength. Samples based on Portland cement CEM II 42.5 and BFC CEMIII 32.5 were also tested for comparison. The results of the studies are presented in Table 6 and Figure 4.
According to the data obtained, the rate of activity decrease during long-term storage for SSC without additives is somewhat higher (by 3–5%) than for PC and BFC. However, even when stored for 180 days, such SSC still retains a strength of about 30 MPa.
For SSC with PCE and CaCl2 additives, no noticeable decrease in activity was observed during the first 30 days of storage in bags, which can be explained by the temporary passivating effect of additives covering the surface of the binder particles. Subsequently, a gradual decrease in the strength of SSC with additives is observed, at approximately the same rate as for industrial cements. At the same time, the strength of SSC remains high even during long-term storage for 180 days, about 40 MPa and 50 MPa, respectively (Table 6).
The obtained results, compared with the known data on preserving the standard strength of SSC based on high-alumina GBFS [12], indicate that the SSC we proposed loses strength at approximately the same rate without additives. However, SSC with PCE and CaCl2 additives even have a particular advantage because these binders barely lose strength during the first 30 days of storage.
The strength of SCC and other factors depends on the grinding fineness, the type and content of the sulfate activator, and other modifying admixtures (Table 7 and Figure 5).
Analysis of the obtained results shows that the use of low-alumina slags, as well as phosphogypsum (PG) as a sulfate activator, combined with complex activation involving a hardening accelerator and a polycarboxylate-type superplasticizer, significantly increases early strength (up to 38–40 MPa on day 7, Figure 5). This is nearly twice the strength specified by the EN standard [13]. These values are higher than those reported by other researchers [15]. Similar results were obtained using carbide slag and sodium sulfate as activators [24].
From an economic point of view, the effectiveness of complex activation using PG, along with the accelerator and superplasticizer, is unquestionable. The choice of PG as an activator is due to its availability in waste dumps and its low utilization cost [7,12]. Calcium chloride is also one of the cheapest hardening accelerator additives; thus, the economic viability of its use is evident.
The combined effect of the addition of the hardening accelerators CaCl2 and CaF2 and PC was studied by performing algorithmized experiments in accordance with the plan B3 [30]. The conditions for planning experiments, the matrix, and the results of the studies on the bending (Rb) and compression (Rc) strength of samples at 28 days are given in Table 8 and Table 9. Based on the experimental data, regression equations for SSC’s bending and compressive strength at 28 days were obtained. The values of W/C in the experiments were determined from the condition of ensuring the standard cone flow.
Analysis of the obtained regression equations (Table 10) and graphical relationships (Figure 6 and Figure 7) indicates that all three factors affect the strength of SSC positively, that is, as their values increase, their strength increases, and by their influence on strength they can be arranged in the following series: X3 > X2 > X1.
The influence of the studied factors on strength is more pronounced in the case of compressive strength, while the bending strength changes relatively little. The effect of slag activation with fluorite, which consists of activating the surface of its particles and, thus, increasing their reactivity, gives a more pronounced effect than the effect of increasing the concentration of Ca2+ ions when using calcium chloride.

4. Conclusions

  • The hardening process of SSCs based on low-alumina slag involves the formation of both low- and high-sulfate calcium aluminosilicate hydrates (CASH) and calcium hydrosilicates. CASH phases predominantly develop during the first 3–7 days, while calcium hydrosilicates form in the later stages of hydration.
  • The use of a hardening accelerator in combination with a polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer significantly enhances the hydration kinetics of SSCs, resulting in notable increases in both early-age and 28-day compressive strength.
  • The type of activator used in SSCs strongly influences the crystallinity and morphology of the hydration products. Over time, the quantity of needle-like and prismatic ettringite crystals increases, while the content of plate-like calcium sulfate dihydrate diminishes. The incorporation of superplasticizer and accelerator promotes the development of a fibrous microstructure dominated by low-basicity calcium hydrosilicates. However, increasing the phosphogypsum content beyond 10% leads to a greater amount of unbound calcium sulfate dihydrate.
  • Analysis of ultrasonic pulse velocity profiles reveals the key structural development stages of SSCs: an initial induction period, a growth phase of gel-like crystalline formations, and a final stage involving solid structure formation and recrystallization.
  • Experimental data show that the rate of strength loss in SSCs during storage is composition-dependent. SSCs without accelerators or superplasticizers tend to lose strength more rapidly than Portland or slag-Portland cement. In contrast, SSCs modified with calcium chloride and polycarboxylate ether (PCE) retain their standard strength during the first 30 days of storage.
  • Polynomial regression models developed for SSC compressive strength demonstrate the individual and synergistic effects of calcium chloride, PCE, and Portland cement content. These models confirm the positive contribution of these components to both compressive and flexural strength.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.D. and V.Z.; methodology, I.H.; software, T.T. and V.Z.; validation, L.D., T.T. and T.Z.; formal analysis, V.Z. and T.T.; investigation, I.H. and V.Z.; resources, T.Z.; data curation, L.D. and T.T.; writing—original draft preparation, L.D. and V.Z; writing—review and editing, I.H. and T.T.; visualization, V.Z. and T.Z.; supervision, L.D. and I.H.; project administration, T.T.; funding acquisition, I.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange under the complementary activities to those undertaken by the university as part of the University Alliance European entitled STARS EU academic cooperation with Ukrainian universities, grant no. BNI-UE-2023-8.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Raw data were generated at the National University of Water and Environmental Engineering in Ukraine and Cracow University of Technology. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Madlool, N.A.; Saidur, R.; Rahim, N.A.; Kamalisarvestani, M. An overview of energy savings measures for cement industries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 19, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Juenger, M.C.G.; Winnefeld, F.; Provis, J.L.; Ideker, J.H. Advances in alternative cementitious binders. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1232–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xiang, Q.; Pan, H.; Ma, X.; Yang, M.; Lyu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Shui, W.; Liao, W.; Xiao, Y.; Wu, J.; et al. Impacts of energy-saving and emission-reduction on sustainability of cement production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 191, 114089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kühl, H. Cement and Process of Manufacturing the Same. U.S. Patent 900,939, 13 October 1908. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US900939A/en (accessed on 12 April 2025).
  5. Svatovskaya, L.B.; Sychev, M.M. Aktivirovannoe Tverdenie Tsementov [Activated Hardening of Cements]; Stroiizdat: Leningrad, Russia, 1983; 160p. [Google Scholar]
  6. Budnikov, P.P. Khimija i Tekhnologija Silikatov [Chemistry and Technology of Silicates]; Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1964; 612p. [Google Scholar]
  7. Erdem, E.; Ölmez, H. The mechanical properties of supersulphated cement containing phosphogypsum. Cem. Concr. Res. 1993, 23, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cai, T.; Hou, P.; Chen, H.; Zhao, P.; Du, P.; Wang, S.; Zhou, X.; Wang, X.; Cheng, X. Effects of nanosilica on supersulfated cements of different clinker-activation degree. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 365, 130118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xie, Y.; Sun, T.; Shui, Z.; Ding, C.; Li, W. The impact of carbonation at different CO2 concentrations on the microstructure of phosphogypsum-based supersulfated cement paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 340, 127823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, L.; Gao, Z.; Gao, F.; Li, X.; Chang, S.; Liu, S. Comparing study on the evolution characteristics of performance and micro-structure between Portland slag cement and supersulfated cement under chemical attacks. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 425, 135969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, Z.; Nie, S.; Zhou, J.; Li, H.; Chen, Z.; Xu, M.; Mu, R.; Wang, Y. Hydration mechanism of calcium sulfoaluminate-activated supersulfated cement. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 333, 130094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dvorkin, L.Y.; Dvorkin, O.L.; Myronenko, A.V.; Polishchuk-Gerasimchuk, T.O.; Kundos, M.G. Modified Gypsum and Sulfate-Slag Binders and Materials Based on Them: Monograph; NUWM: Rivne, Ukraine, 2011; p. 188. [Google Scholar]
  13. EN 15743; Supersulfated Cement—Composition, Specification and Conformity Criteria. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
  14. Wang, J.; Li, X.; Sun, R.; Zhao, Y.; Gong, F.; Huang, T.; Liu, Z.; Wang, D. Early-age carbonation mitigation of SSC by CxS minerals: Mechanism and performances. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 430, 136391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Q.; Xue, Q.; Yu, Z. Research status of super sulfate cement. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 294, 126228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zokaei, S.; Siad, H.; Lachemi, M.; Mahmoodi, O.; Ozcelikci, E.; Şahmaran, M. Engineered Cementitious Composites with Super-Sulfated Cement: Mechanical, Physical, and Durability Performance. Materials 2024, 17, 2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Gao, Y.; Yu, B.; Tang, W. Influence of fineness on hydration kinetics of supersulfated cement. Thermochim. Acta 2015, 605, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, R.; Li, B.; Chen, H.; Li, Q.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Tchakouté, H.K.; Mapesu, P.; Hou, P.; Cheng, X. Improving the frost-resistance performance of supersulfated cement by reducing the crystalline-to-gel ratio through the addition of nano-SiO2. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 424, 135872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liao, Y.; Yao, J.; Deng, F.; Li, H.; Wang, K.; Tang, S. Hydration behavior and strength development of supersulfated cement prepared by calcined phosphogypsum and slaked lime. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 80, 108075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pinto, S.R.; da Luz, C.A.; Munhoz, G.S.; Medeiros-Junior, R.A. Durability of phosphogypsum-based supersulfated cement mortar against external attack by sodium and magnesium sulfate. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 136, 106172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Masoudi, R.; Hooton, R. Examining the hydration mechanism of super-sulfated cements made with high and low-alumina slags. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 103, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, Y.; Peng, Z.; Chen, L.; Huang, J.; Ma, T. The influence of two types of alkali activators on the microstructure and performance of supersulfated cement concrete: Mitigating the strength and carbonation resistance. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 118, 103947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nguyen, H.A.; Chang, T.P.; Shih, J.Y.; Chen, C.T. Influence of low calcium fly ash on compressive strength and hydration product of low energy super sulfated cement paste. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 99, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qi, G.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, Z. Effect of Calcium Aluminate and Carbide Slag on Mechanical Property and Hydration Mechanism of Supersulfated Cement. Buildings 2024, 14, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Du, Y.; Chen, Q.; Wu, F.; Li, W.; Meng, L.; Liu, Y. Early Strength Enhancement Mechanism of CaO-Modified Electrolytic Manganese Residue-Based Supersulfate Cement. Materials 2025, 18, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gruskovnjak, A.; Lothenbach, B.; Winnefeld, F.; Figi, R.; Ko, S.-C.; Adler, M.; Mäder, U. Hydration mechanisms of super sulphated slag cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008, 38, 983–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pashchenko, O.O.; Serbin, V.P.; Starchevska, O.O. Binders; Higher School: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1995; p. 416. [Google Scholar]
  28. EN 1015-11:2019; Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry—Part 11: Determination of Flexural and Compressive Strength of Hardened Mortar. Comité Européen de Normalisation: Brussels, Belgium, 2019.
  29. Box, G.E.P.; Hunter, J.S.; Hunter, W.G. Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Discovery, and Innovation, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; p. 655. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dvorkin, L.; Dvorkin, O.; Ribakov, Y. Mathematical Experiments Planning in Concrete Technology; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2012; p. 172. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhu, J.Y.; Sun, H.B. Monitoring hardening of concrete using ultrasonic guided waves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2015, 138, 1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 196-3:2016-12; Methods of Testing Cement—Part 3: Determination of Setting Time and Soundness. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2016.
Figure 1. X-ray images of hardened binder: 1–8 compositions and duration of hardening of SSC according to Table 4.
Figure 1. X-ray images of hardened binder: 1–8 compositions and duration of hardening of SSC according to Table 4.
Materials 18 01912 g001
Figure 2. Microphotographs of different sections of hardened SSC paste (magnification ×1000): 1—BFGS (85%) + PG (10%) + PC (5%) at days; 2—GBFS (85%) + PG (10%) + PC (5%) at 180 days; 3—BFGS (82.6%) + PG (10%) + PC (5%)+ PCE (0.4%) + CaCl2 (2%); 4—BFGS (88%) + PG (10%) + CaO (2%); 5—BFC (100%); 6—BFGS (85%) + GS (10%) + PC (5%).
Figure 2. Microphotographs of different sections of hardened SSC paste (magnification ×1000): 1—BFGS (85%) + PG (10%) + PC (5%) at days; 2—GBFS (85%) + PG (10%) + PC (5%) at 180 days; 3—BFGS (82.6%) + PG (10%) + PC (5%)+ PCE (0.4%) + CaCl2 (2%); 4—BFGS (88%) + PG (10%) + CaO (2%); 5—BFC (100%); 6—BFGS (85%) + GS (10%) + PC (5%).
Materials 18 01912 g002
Figure 3. Relationship between ultrasound velocity (Vus, m/s) in SSC paste of standard consistency and curing times: 1—W/C = 0.26 (SSC with 10% gypsum); 2—W/C = 0.28 (SSC with 15% gypsum); 3—W/C = 0.22 (SSC with 10% gypsum; 0.4% PCE + 2% CaCl2); 4—W/C = 0.26 (SSC with 10% gypsum stone).
Figure 3. Relationship between ultrasound velocity (Vus, m/s) in SSC paste of standard consistency and curing times: 1—W/C = 0.26 (SSC with 10% gypsum); 2—W/C = 0.28 (SSC with 15% gypsum); 3—W/C = 0.22 (SSC with 10% gypsum; 0.4% PCE + 2% CaCl2); 4—W/C = 0.26 (SSC with 10% gypsum stone).
Materials 18 01912 g003
Figure 4. Compressive strength after 28 days with the duration of previous storage of the binder.
Figure 4. Compressive strength after 28 days with the duration of previous storage of the binder.
Materials 18 01912 g004
Figure 5. The influence of grinding fineness in combination with other factors on strength SSC (designation according to Table 7).
Figure 5. The influence of grinding fineness in combination with other factors on strength SSC (designation according to Table 7).
Materials 18 01912 g005
Figure 6. Relationship between the strength of sulfate–slag binders and the consumption of CaCl2 (x2) and PC (x1), the content of the additive CaF2 = 1% (x3 = 0).
Figure 6. Relationship between the strength of sulfate–slag binders and the consumption of CaCl2 (x2) and PC (x1), the content of the additive CaF2 = 1% (x3 = 0).
Materials 18 01912 g006
Figure 7. Relationship between the strength of sulfate–slag binders and the consumption of additives CaF2 (x3) and CaCl2 (x2), lime content 1% (x3 = 0).
Figure 7. Relationship between the strength of sulfate–slag binders and the consumption of additives CaF2 (x3) and CaCl2 (x2), lime content 1% (x3 = 0).
Materials 18 01912 g007
Table 1. Mechanical and physical requirements given as characteristic values (EN 15743:2010 [13]).
Table 1. Mechanical and physical requirements given as characteristic values (EN 15743:2010 [13]).
Strength
Class
Compressive Strength, MPaInitial Setting Time, min
Early StrengthStandard Strength
2 Days7 Days28 Days
32.5 L-≥12.0≥32.5≤52.5≥75
32.5 N -≥16.0
42.5 L-≥16.0≥42.5≤62.5≥60
42.5 N ≥10.0-
52.5 L≥10.0-≥52.5-≥45
52.5 N ≥20.0-
Table 2. Chemical composition of granulated blast furnace slag.
Table 2. Chemical composition of granulated blast furnace slag.
Oxide Content in Slag, wt. %
SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOSO3MnOLOIΣ, %
39.516.470.1447.193.121.761.140.5999.92
Table 3. XRF chemical composition of gypsum and phosphogypsum (% wt.).
Table 3. XRF chemical composition of gypsum and phosphogypsum (% wt.).
Gypsum (Stone) (GS)
LOISiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOSO3CaSO4·2H2O
17.878.540.700.429.880.4141.8589.97
Phosphogypsum (PG)
CaOSO3P2O5
total
P2O5
water-soluble.
Fe2O3Al2O3FMgOCl
38.359.10.690.040.160.340.140.0040.01
Table 4. SSC compositions and curing times.
Table 4. SSC compositions and curing times.
No.SSC Composition,%Hardening Duration, Days
BFGSSulfate
Component
Portland CementAdditive
190PG-10PC-5-7
290PG-10PC-5-180
390PG-10PC-5PCE—0.4%,
CaCl2–2%
7
485PG-15PC-5-7
580PG-20PC-5-7
690GS-10PC-5-7
7BFC 7
880GS-20PC-5-180
Note: PG—lime-neutralized phosphogypsum, GS—gypsum stone, PC—Portland cement, BFGS—blast furnace granulated slag, BFC—Blast furnace cement.
Table 5. Standard consistency and setting times of SSC.
Table 5. Standard consistency and setting times of SSC.
SSC Composition,%Admixture, %Standard
Consistence, %
Setting Time,
h-min
BFGSSulfate ComponentAlkaline Component
85PG-10PC-5-263–107–40
85GS-10PC-5-263–307–50
88PG-10Lime-2-263–508–10
88GS-10Lime-2-263–508–20
85PG-10PC-5PCE—0.2%244–207–40
85PG-10PC-5PCE—0.4%224–407–10
85FG-10PC-5PCE—0.4%
+ CaCl2–2%
223–206–50
85GS-10PC-5PCE—0.4%224–508–20
Note: PG—lime-neutralized phosphogypsum, GS—gypsum stone, PC—Portland cement.
Table 6. Decrease in the 28-day compressive strength of SSC and similar industrial cements, depending on the duration of storage.
Table 6. Decrease in the 28-day compressive strength of SSC and similar industrial cements, depending on the duration of storage.
Type of BinderAdditiveCompressive Strength After 28 Days with the Duration of Previous Storage of the Binder
2–3 h30 Days90 Days180 Days
MeanStandard Deviation
(SD)
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
SSC-36.41.632.71.529.31.428.11
SSC-APCE-0.4%52.81.452.71.848.52.043. 22.1
SSC-BPCE-0.6% CaCl2-2%62.41.462.61.154.41.649.21.5
PC---51.81.848.81.643.22.0
BFC---29.41.126.41.223.71.6
Note: PC—Portland cement, BFC—Blast furnace cement, SSC—supersulfated cement, SSC-A and SSC-B—supersulfated cement with admixtures.
Table 7. The influence of grinding fineness in combination with other factors on strength SSC.
Table 7. The influence of grinding fineness in combination with other factors on strength SSC.
#SCC Composition, %Specific Surface Area, m2/kgType/Content (%)
of Modifying Admixtures
Compressive Strength, MPa
BFGSSulfate
Activator
PC7 Days28 Days
MeanSDMeanSD
180PG/155390-12.51.125.31.8
280PG/155615-21.42.330.61.8
385PG/105615-29.51.636.41.4
490PG/55610-19.41.428.12.2
590GC/105620 21.51.431.51.3
690PG/105610CaCl2/240.91.851.31.3
790PG/105615CaCl2/238.52.052.41.4
890PG/105610PCE/0.440.11.752.71.7
Table 8. Conditions for planning an experiment.
Table 8. Conditions for planning an experiment.
Technological FactorsLevels of VariationVariation Interval
Natural ViewCoded View−10+1
PC content, %x11.02.03.01.0
Content of CaCl2, %x201.02.01.0
Content of CaF2, %x301.02.01.0
Table 9. Planning matrix and research results.
Table 9. Planning matrix and research results.
Coded Factor ValuesStrength, MPa
x1x2x3Bending (Rb)Compressive (Rc)
MeanSDMeanSD
+1+1+111.520.2159.440.99
+1+1−18.510.1139.581.92
+1−1+18.930.3840.621.53
+1−1−17.500.9526.392.03
−1+1+19.570.4643.271.64
−1+1−17.730.8528.581.11
−1−1+17.760.4129.241.86
−1−1−17.501.0120.201.51
+1009.970.6650.231.55
−1008.910.1839.011.81
0+1010.040.5151.091.8
0−108.610.2237.581.83
00+110.120.3251.001.62
00−18.510.8136.571.98
0009.700.3348.432.05
0009.660.4848.371.56
0009.740.7148.411.77
Table 10. Regression equation for the strength of SSC with additives of hardening accelerator CaCl2 and activator CaF2.
Table 10. Regression equation for the strength of SSC with additives of hardening accelerator CaCl2 and activator CaF2.
Output ParametersRegression Equation (Confidence Probability (Importance Level) of 95%)
Bending strength
SSC at 28 days, MPa
R b = 9.7 + 0.5 x 1 + 0.7 x 2 + 0.8 x 3 0.3 x 1 2 0.4 x 2 2 0.4 x 3 2     (5)
Standard deviation: 0.724
Mean quadratic errors: 0.256
Criterion of Fisher (calculated): 2.83
Compressive strength of SSC at 28 days, MPa R c = 48.4 + 5.6 x 1 + 6.8 x 2 + 7.2 x 3 3.8 x 1 2 4.1 x 2 2 4.6 x 3 2     (6)
Standard deviation: 1.313
Mean quadratic errors: 0.464
Criterion of Fisher (calculated): 3.81
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dvorkin, L.; Zhitkovsky, V.; Hager, I.; Tracz, T.; Zdeb, T. Structure Formation and Properties of Activated Supersulfate Cement. Materials 2025, 18, 1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18091912

AMA Style

Dvorkin L, Zhitkovsky V, Hager I, Tracz T, Zdeb T. Structure Formation and Properties of Activated Supersulfate Cement. Materials. 2025; 18(9):1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18091912

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dvorkin, Leonid, Vadim Zhitkovsky, Izabela Hager, Tomasz Tracz, and Tomasz Zdeb. 2025. "Structure Formation and Properties of Activated Supersulfate Cement" Materials 18, no. 9: 1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18091912

APA Style

Dvorkin, L., Zhitkovsky, V., Hager, I., Tracz, T., & Zdeb, T. (2025). Structure Formation and Properties of Activated Supersulfate Cement. Materials, 18(9), 1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18091912

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop