An Algorithm for Estimation of SF6 Leakage on Power Substation Assets
, Rodolfo GarcÃa Sierra 2, Andrés Felipe Cerón Piamba 1, Benjamin Mailhé 3 and Luis Miguel León Gil 3,*Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
There is a percentage error of up to 50% between estimated and actual values. The authors present some explanations, however, I did not see a reason for this. I also point out that some of the graphs presented contain overlapping text and numbers. In view of this, I suggest a revision of the points highlighted in the comments, and then submitting it to a new review.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
We appreciate your comments and your notes about our research.
You can find our responses to your comments in the file attached as well as the revised version of the manuscript.
LM
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
No special suggestions. From the substantive point of view, the researchers maintained the correct research technique and clearly described it in the article. I did not find any glaring errors. In summary, the article is worth publishing. The proposed algorithm may become a useful tool supporting making investment decisions for distribution network operators.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
We appreciate your comments and your your opinion of our research, you can find a revised version of the manuscript attached to this message.
LM
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
- Figures 2 and 3 are not cleared and must be readable.
- The abbreviations of Table 2 must be identified.
- I think the relative error % in Table 2 is so high, how can the relative error to be 50%.
- Can the authors make a comparison with the other models in this point of research?
- The flowchart in Figure 1 must be explained in detail with a numerical example.
- Please, revise the English language by an expert or a native language person.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
We appreciate your comments and your notes about our research.
You can find our responses to your comments in the file attached as well as the revised version of the manuscript.
LM
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 3 Report
No additional Comments
