Next Article in Journal
Are Consumers Interested in Colored Beech Wood and Furniture Products?
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Features of a Post-Clear-Cutting Ecotone between 90-Year-Old Bilberry Spruce Forest and 35-Year-Old Herbs-Forbs Deciduous Stand
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Flepp et al. Temporal Dynamics of Root Reinforcement in European Spruce Forests. Forests 2021, 12, 815

1
Bern School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL, University of Applied Sciences BFH, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland
2
Departement of Agriculture, Università Degli Studi di Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
3
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 6953 Cadenazzo, Switzerland
4
Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
5
Forestry Training Center, 3250 Lyss, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2022, 13(9), 1469; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091469
Submission received: 31 August 2022 / Accepted: 3 September 2022 / Published: 13 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecology and Management)
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1].
The Affiliation 3 should be update from:
3 Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
to
3 Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 6953 Cadenazzo, Switzerland
In Section 2.5, The maximum root reinforcement R R m a x was calculated using the following formula implemented in the SlideforNET model [14,15]. Equations (20) and (21) should be changed from:
R R m a x ( D B H , d )   =   a · D B H · Γ d D B H · 18.5 , b , c for d   <   18.5
R R m a x ( D B H , d )   =   0 for d   >   18.5
to
R R m a x ( D B H , d )   =   a · D B H · Γ d D B H · 18.5 , b , c for d   <   DBH · 18.5
R R m a x ( D B H , d )   =   0 for d   >   DBH · 18.5
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Flepp, G.; Robyr, R.; Scotti, R.; Giadrossich, F.; Conedera, M.; Vacchiano, G.; Fischer, C.; Ammann, P.; May, D.; Schwarz, M. Temporal Dynamics of Root Reinforcement in European Spruce Forests. Forests 2021, 12, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Flepp, G.; Robyr, R.; Scotti, R.; Giadrossich, F.; Conedera, M.; Vacchiano, G.; Fischer, C.; Ammann, P.; May, D.; Schwarz, M. Correction: Flepp et al. Temporal Dynamics of Root Reinforcement in European Spruce Forests. Forests 2021, 12, 815. Forests 2022, 13, 1469. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091469

AMA Style

Flepp G, Robyr R, Scotti R, Giadrossich F, Conedera M, Vacchiano G, Fischer C, Ammann P, May D, Schwarz M. Correction: Flepp et al. Temporal Dynamics of Root Reinforcement in European Spruce Forests. Forests 2021, 12, 815. Forests. 2022; 13(9):1469. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091469

Chicago/Turabian Style

Flepp, Gianluca, Roger Robyr, Roberto Scotti, Filippo Giadrossich, Marco Conedera, Giorgio Vacchiano, Christoph Fischer, Peter Ammann, Dominik May, and Massimiliano Schwarz. 2022. "Correction: Flepp et al. Temporal Dynamics of Root Reinforcement in European Spruce Forests. Forests 2021, 12, 815" Forests 13, no. 9: 1469. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091469

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop