Next Article in Journal
Effects of Climate Change on Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Growth across Europe: Decrease of Tree-Ring Fluctuation and Amplification of Climate Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Response of Typical Tree Species Sap Flow to Environmental Factors in the Hilly Areas of Haihe River Basin, China
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Shifts in Soil Fungal Functional Group Characteristics across Distinct Vegetation Types during Ecological Restoration in Degraded Red Soil Regions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Calibration of Thermal Dissipation Probes for Xylem Sap Flow in the Wood of a Diffuse-Porous and a Conifer Species under Cyclic Heating
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characteristics of Changes in Sap Flow-Based Transpiration of Poplars, Locust Trees, and Willows and Their Response to Environmental Impact Factors

1
State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
3
School of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(1), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010090
Submission received: 30 November 2023 / Revised: 19 December 2023 / Accepted: 22 December 2023 / Published: 2 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sap Flow Measurements—A Tool To Talk with Trees)

Abstract

:
The sap flow and transpiration of three typical tree species (poplar, locust tree, and willow) in Ningxia are crucial for sustaining the ecosystem in the Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation area. However, there is a lack of clarity regarding the variations in sap flow and transpiration of these trees and their corresponding responses to environmental factors. From February to December 2021, this study selected 30 samples representing the three typical trees in the irrigation area and monitored their tree sapwood sap flow continuously and dynamically using the Thermal Diffusion Probe method. This study yielded several key findings: (1) Variations exist in sap flow density and transpiration among the three typical trees, with willows exhibiting higher sap flow density and transpiration than poplars and locust trees. (2) Tree transpiration showed a highly significant positive correlation with net radiation, temperature, and vapor pressure deficit, along with a highly significant negative correlation with relative humidity. (3) Soil moisture content undergoes changes under precipitation and artificial drip irrigation, but its correlation with tree transpiration is limited. (4) The primary environmental factors influencing poplars, locust trees, and willows are temperature, soil moisture content at a depth of 30 cm, and soil moisture content at a depth of 60 cm.

1. Introduction

Transpiration, recognized as one of the most crucial physiological activities in plants [1], plays a vital role in plant physiological processes and ecosystem functioning [2] and constitutes a significant component of the hydrological cycle. Acting as the regulatory mechanism for water transport between the plant and its external environment through stomata, transpiration manifests as sap flow in the xylem layer, facilitating the movement of water from the roots to the leaves. Consequently, assessing plant sap flow emerges as an effective means of measuring transpiration. Contemporary research underscores that the measurement of tree sap flow serves as a pivotal indicator of plant transpiration rate [3,4,5,6,7]. Widely adopted in this context, the Thermal Diffusion Probe (TDP) technique has proven instrumental [8,9,10,11]. This method calculates sap flux density by leveraging temperature differences between two TDPs mounted along the stem. It further extrapolates transpiration for an individual tree by scaling point measurements within the tree to the total cross-sectional area of the sapwood. Notably, this technique combines applicability and repeatability, making it a valuable tool for accurate and replicable measurements. This technique proves valuable for analyzing sap flow density (SFD) and transpiration patterns in three typical tree species within the Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation area (NYRIa) [12].
The NYRIa is a crucial ecological barrier in the western region of China, ensuring the ecological security of the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River, North China, and Northwest China [13]. Poplar (Populus tomentosa), willow (Salix matsudana), and locust tree (Robinia pseudoacacia Linn.) are the primary tree species used for protective forests and urban greening in the NYRIa [14], playing a significant role in restoring vegetation cover and enhancing the ecological environment within this region [15,16]. With the implementation of the policy to return farmland to forests and an increase in planting density [17,18], the total water consumption demand for normal tree growth is increasing year by year [19], which is bound to further impact the irrigation area’s water supply and demand. It is necessary to design a suitable irrigation management system for the unique climatic and geographic conditions of the irrigation area to promote the healthy growth of arbor in the NYRIa [20]. An essential foundation for the establishment of effective irrigation systems is the precise estimation of the SFD and transpiration patterns in the region [19]. Given the markedly distinct physiological characteristics exhibited by the three typical trees, it follows that variations in sap flow and transpiration patterns are inevitable. Unraveling the intricacies of this variability, alongside comprehending water consumption patterns, presents a significant challenge for all stakeholders, encompassing the scientific community, management entities, and policymakers.
Plant sap flow is significantly influenced by the meteorological environment, which includes factors such as temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, net radiation, atmospheric pressure, and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Furthermore, it has been verified that the meteorological drivers of the SFD can change with tree species [27]. Therefore, it is very important to evaluate the changes in the SFD of different tree species and their response to meteorological factors to understand and predict the response of tree growth to climate change. Meanwhile, the soil properties also affect tree transpiration to some extent [28,29]. Soil water is essential for plant sap flow and growth, prompting the common practice of using irrigation to enhance these processes [30]. Additionally, precipitation plays a pivotal role in momentarily augmenting soil water content (SWC) [31], thereby amplifying vegetation transpiration [32,33]. In the NYRIa, both precipitation and irrigation stand out as primary factors contributing to fluctuations in SWC—an influential factor shaping vegetation transpiration [34,35]. However, the effect of soil moisture conditions on the transpiration of arbor in the NYRIa has often been neglected. The response of plant sap flow to environmental factors is an extremely complex one, with sap flow characteristics varying widely across different tree species, meteorological conditions, groundwater depths, and SWC [36]. Currently, most studies focus on the response of specific plant transpiration to meteorological factors, but there is a lack of research on the transpiration of various typical tree species within a region and on the relationship between SWCs [37,38,39]. Hence, the discernment of the correlation between water consumption in vegetation transpiration and SWC holds significant value for the effective execution of water-saving irrigation practices in the NYRIa.
Artificial neural networks serve as potent non-linear statistical tools, mimicking the functionality of human nerve cells. These independent algorithmic learning systems are adept at incorporating artificial intelligence techniques [40]. Artificial neural network-based models have been effectively employed in understanding the relationships among meteorological factors, stomatal conductance, SFD, and vegetation growth [41,42]. However, there is a noticeable gap in the existing literature concerning the comprehensive assessment of the diverse effects of various environmental factors on distinct typical arbor trees, particularly through the lens of artificial neural networks. Employing the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model offers a novel perspective for evaluating the impact of 12 environmental factors on the transpiration of three typical arbors.
In conclusion, variations exist in sap flow and transpiration among different tree types, along with distinct responses to environmental factors. Nevertheless, a quantitative evaluation of the differences among the three typical trees in the NYRIa remains elusive. Therefore, the four main sections of this paper focus on (a) exploring sap flow and transpiration characteristics in three typical trees within the NYRIa, (b) examining their response to meteorological factors and unique traits in transpiration water consumption, (c) analyzing their response to different soil moisture conditions (precipitation and drip irrigation) in transpiration water consumption, and (d) evaluating the key factors influencing transpiration variations in various tree species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Ningxia is situated within the middle and upper reaches of the Yellow River Basin, sharing borders with Gansu, Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, and other provinces. It boasts a long and narrow north–south border, encompassing a total area of 66,400 km2 [43]. The climate is characterized as dry, falling under the category of continental monsoon climate [44]. The NYRIa typifies an arid region with an average precipitation of only 192 mm. Notably, the majority of the annual precipitation occurs between May and September, constituting 82.0% of the total annual precipitation. The remaining months witness comparatively low precipitation rates but are characterized by higher levels of evaporation [45]. The NYRIa experiences an average evaporation capacity of 1122 mm, approximately six times higher than the precipitation. Evaporation is concentrated mainly from April to August, accounting for 67% of the total annual evaporation. The average temperature in the NYRIa ranges from 8 to 9 °C, with daily temperature differences typically spanning 12 to 15 °C. Among the common tree species in the NYRIa are poplars, willows, and locust trees.
This study reveals an uneven distribution of groundwater depth (GD) in the NYRIa due to prolonged irrigation. This GD variable significantly influences the SWC, subsequently affecting the growth and transpiration of local vegetation. To explore this relationship effectively, this study identifies five monitoring stations, each with varying GDs and thriving arbor (Figure 1): Shizuishan station, Huinongqu station, Ningxia central station, Forestpark station, and Suyukou station. These stations exhibit GDs of 1.1 m, 1.8 m, 4.4 m, 10 m, and >100 m, respectively.

2.2. Measurement of Sapwood Area of Trees and Biological Characteristics

The sapwood area plays a critical role in determining thermal diffusion flux. Typically, the correlation between tree diameter at breast height (DBH) and sapwood area (AS) is employed for AS calculations. In this study, we determine AS by selecting trees of the same species and growth environment as the target trees. We establish the relationship between AS and DBH for different tree types. Finally, we calculate the corresponding AS using the fitted curve and the observed DBH of the target trees. This approach minimizes damage to the observed sample trees, ensures data accuracy, and meets the requirements for long-term observation of sap flow data. The equation describing the relationship between AS and DBH for the three trees is:
Poplar: As = 0.820DBH1.809 (R2 = 0.9328, n = 10)
Locust tree: As = 0.466DBH1.824 (R2 = 0.9205, n = 25)
Willow: As = 1.370DBH1.682 (R2 = 0.9834, n = 6)
To study the effects of soil moisture and meteorological conditions on vegetation transpiration, in situ experiments were conducted at the five mentioned sites. Our study utilized TDP thermal diffusion technology to monitor the sap flow process of 30 trees, considering factors such as tree species, DBH, tree height, drip irrigation, and crown width (CW). Table 1 presents monitored vegetation information from each site. Additionally, a soil moisture monitoring system was installed both horizontally (0.5 to 1 m from the root system) and within the root system to track moisture levels.

2.3. Sap Flow

Different-size thermal dissipation probes (Dynamax Inc., Houston, TX, USA) were used to monitor the tree sap flux density from February to December 2021. To ensure measurement accuracy, the probe length was selected based on the sapwood width of different trees. After probe installation, the probe and tree were sealed with silicone adhesive to prevent rainwater entry. The probe area was wrapped in aluminum foil to mitigate heat radiation impact. Cling film was then wrapped around the tree and the upper part of the reflective bubble insulator to prevent water ingress from the tree surface.
All data were automatically recorded by a data collector, averaged every 10 min, and stored. According to Granier’s empirical formula [46], the measured temperature difference between the two probes was converted into the SFD of the tree sapwood:
S F D i = 0.0119 ( Δ T m a x Δ T Δ T ) 1.231
where S F D i is the sap flux density (g cm−2 s−1), T is the probe temperature difference between the two needles (°C), and T m a x is the maximum value of ΔT recorded in the non-transpiration period when S F D i is near zero (°C).
The hourly evapotranspiration E T i (g/h) for a sample tree was calculated using the formula:
E T i = 3600 × A s × S F D i
where A s represents the sapwood area and 3600 is a time conversion coefficient that extends the instantaneous sapwood density to hourly sapwood flow. The total transpiration for the entire tree in a single day can be obtained by accumulating these hourly values.

2.4. Meteorological and Soil Moisture Measurements

Meteorological factors, including temperature (T) (°C), relative humidity (RH) (%), wind speed (WS) (m/s), precipitation (P) (mm), net radiation (Rn) (MJ·m−2/day), and VPD (kPa), were selected. These were measured by a Weatherhawk 232 automatic weather station placed on the open ground around the trees, with a data collection interval of 10 min. VPD was calculated based on RH and T data using the formula [29]:
V P D = 0.611 e ( 17.502 T / ( T + 240.97 ) ) ( 1 R H )
where VPD is the water vapor pressure deficit (kPa), T is the temperature (°C), and RH is the relative humidity (%).
The soil moisture monitoring profile, positioned 0.5~1 m horizontally from the tree roots, consisted of a vertically excavated 2 m deep soil pit (2 m × 1 m). Probes were inserted into six soil layers at depths of 30 cm, 60 cm, 90 cm, 120 cm, 160 cm, and 200 cm. Volumetric water content, soil temperature, and soil conductivity in these layers were monitored, with the data collector recording measurements every 10 min.
Drip irrigation was applied twice during the growing season, first on 10–11 May with a total water volume of 3.92 L, and then on 11–13 July with a total water volume of 4.89 L.

2.5. MLP Model

In order to identify patterns in various experimental datasets, artificial neural network models have been widely implemented as a practical tool [46]. The MLP model is a biologically inspired computational network consisting of at least 3 layers (input, hidden, and output) along with connecting neurons and nodes arrayed in each layer (Figure 2). The model consists of 12 independent variables as inputs (T, P, RH, Rn, WS, VPD, SWC30cm, SWC60cm, SWC90cm, SWC120cm, SWC160cm, and SWC200cm) and only the dependent variable Y as an output, which is tested by trial and error on the hidden layers (1–12) and the neurons in each of the hidden layers to find the best topology of each artificial neural network system’s optimal topology.

3. Results

3.1. Trend Analysis of Meteorological Factors

In this study, we analyzed the T, precipitation (P), Rn, RH, WS, and VPD trends in the NYRIa from March to December 2021 (Figure 3).
The average annual RH was 45.28%, characterized by high temperatures and low precipitation from May to August, resulting in decreased air humidity. In 2021, the RH ranged from a maximum of 85.69% with 6.2 mm of precipitation to a minimum of 20.19%. VPD exhibited a lower level during the growing season (May–October) and a higher level during the non-growing season, contrasting the trend of relative humidity. WS showed no distinct seasonal pattern, with maximum speeds occurring mainly in spring (March–June). Precipitation was concentrated in spring and fall, totaling 141.7 mm in 2021, less than the 2020 drought year. The maximum daily precipitation for the year was 35.7 mm. Rn followed the temperature trend, increasing and then decreasing from February to July, with a subsequent cooling phase from August to December. The average annual temperature was 11.83 °C.

3.2. Characterization of Changes in Sap Flow and Transpiration in Typical Trees

3.2.1. Characteristics of Daily Variation in Sap Flow of Typical Trees

In the Ningxia central station, six trees were selected: two poplars (NC-Y3 and NC-Y4), two locust trees (NC-H1 and NC-H2), and two willows (NC-L1 and NC-L2). This helped characterize the changes in tree SFD among the different species.
The growing season, based on sap flow initiation, spans from May to October for poplars and locust trees and from April to October for willows (Table 2). Poplars consistently initiate sap flow earliest, followed by willows and then locust trees. Sap flow initiation times progressively delay each month, ranging from 70 to 160 min. The tree SFD of the three typical trees exhibited distinct diurnal patterns, with the peak sap flow consistently occurring at a similar time. During the night to early morning, characterized by weak solar radiation, low air temperature, and high relative humidity, SFD remained small and relatively stable. As solar radiation increased, air temperature rose, and relative humidity decreased, the initiation of tree sap flow typically commenced between 6 and 8 a.m.
For poplars, the start time shifts from 5:30 a.m. in May to 7:50 a.m. in October, while locust trees’ start time moves from about 6:20 a.m. in May to around 9:00 a.m. in October. Willows exhibit a ‘late–early–late’ pattern, initiating sap flow gradually earlier (from 6:50 to 6:00 a.m.) from April to June and later (from 6:00 to about 8:00 a.m.) from July to October.
Throughout the growing season, the daily variation in tree SFD for the three typical trees exhibited an inverted ‘U’ shape, featuring single or double peaks (Figure 4). Willows displayed the highest peak mean SFD (4.24 × 10−3 cm/s), followed by locust trees (3.75 × 10−3 cm/s), and poplars with the smallest (2.55 × 10−3 cm/s). Conversely, during the growing season, SFD increases slowed down around 9:00 a.m., while in the non-growing season, decreases in SFD commenced around the same hour, albeit to a lesser extent.

3.2.2. Typical Tree Transpiration Pattern

In this study, we calculated the cumulative SFD over the sapwood area as a proxy for single-plant transpiration, converting the units to L/d for ease of presentation and description. Figure 5 presents the month-by-month transpiration process of the three typical arbors. The three typical arbors exhibited distinct patterns of transpiration water consumption during the growing and non-growing seasons.
Significant differences in transpiration were observed between the growing and non-growing seasons for the three typical trees (Figure 5). The average transpiration of poplars, locust trees, and willows during the growing season was 21.4 L/d, 11.4 L/d, and 24.11 L/d, respectively, while during the non-growing season, the transpiration decreased to 11.68 L/d, 2.32 L/d, and 12.2 L/d, respectively. Transpiration sharply increased at the start of the growing season and remained high. Poplars and locust trees showed rapid transpiration growth in May, peaking from May to June, while willows’ sap flow increased gradually in April, peaking in water consumption from April to June. In contrast, water consumption was relatively low during the non-growing period.
Differences in transpiration characteristics were noted among trees of the same species: ETNC-Y4 > ETNC-Y3, ETNC-H2 > ETNC-H1, and ETNC-L2 > ETNC-L1, aligning with the DBH and SFD of the trees. NC-Y4 had a larger DBH and SFD than NC-Y3, resulting in greater evapotranspiration from Y4 than Y3 during the growing season. DBH and sap flow density jointly determine the difference in transpiration between two willow trees. NC-L2 (22.6 cm) had a larger DBH than NC-L1 (14.5 cm). The average sap flow density of NC-L2 (2.28 × 10−3 cm/s) was significantly larger than that of NC-L1 (1.74 × 10−3 cm/s) from April to August, leading to significantly greater transpiration for NC-L2 during the same period.
Distinct transpiration characteristics were observed among different tree types. Willow (24.11 L/d) transpiration was the highest, followed by poplars (21.4 L/d), and locust trees (11.4 L/d) exhibiting the lowest.

3.3. Differential Analysis of Sap Flux Density Response Characteristics of Typical Trees to Meteorological Factors

Table 3 presents Pearson correlation coefficients between daily SFD and five factors (Rn, T, RH, VPD, and WS). The analysis included 344 sets of SFD and meteorological data collected during the growing period.
Common correlation patterns emerged across the three representative tree species and meteorological factors. SFD showed a highly significant positive correlation with Rn, T, and VPD (p < 0.01). Conversely, a highly significant negative correlation existed between SFD and RH. However, the correlation between SFD and WS was not significant (p > 0.05).
Differences in correlation magnitudes appeared between the three tree species and various meteorological factors. For instance, at a depth of 1.1 m, poplars showed significant positive correlations with Rn, VPD, and T (0.854/0.819/0.735, respectively), along with a significant negative correlation with RH (−0.622). Locust trees displayed Rn as the most influential positive factor (correlation coefficient: 0.891), with a stronger correlation with T than VPD (correlation coefficient: 0.891 vs. 0.559). Furthermore, locust trees had lower correlations with Rn and VPD compared to poplars and willows (0.502 and 0.407, respectively), and their correlation with T was even lower at 0.294.
The correlation between SFD and meteorological factors was significantly affected by GD. Stations at varying GDs (1.1 m to 4.4 m) revealed that the correlation between the SFD of poplars and willows and meteorological factors decreased with increasing GD. However, for locust trees, the correlation improved significantly, indicating stronger ties between poplar and willow SFDs and meteorological factors under shallow GD conditions. The correlation of poplars slightly decreased after an increase from 1.1 m to >100 m, while the correlation of locust trees increased significantly.

3.4. Analysis of Changes in Transpiration Water Consumption Characteristics of Typical Trees in Response to Soil Moisture

3.4.1. Effect of Precipitation and Drip Irrigation on SWC

Precipitation and drip irrigation effectively boost SWC in the NYRIa. This study assesses the impact of the maximum rainfall event and two drip irrigation sessions on SWC (Table 4). The peak precipitation occurred on 14–15 September, with 23 mm and 12.7 mm of precipitation, constituting 25.2% of the total annual precipitation. The two drip irrigation events transpired on 10–11 May and 11–13 July, delivering 3.92 L and 4.89 L of water, respectively.
Precipitation notably affected the topsoil, especially SWC30cm, resulting in a 10.34% increase. However, its influence on other soil layers, particularly below 90 cm, was minimal. In contrast, drip irrigation significantly raised SWC throughout the entire (0–200 cm) soil profile. Both drip irrigation events caused an over 11% increase in SWC from 30 to 90 cm in both instances.
Figure 6 shows ET changes in three trees under precipitation conditions. Before the precipitation occurred, the ET of the trees declined. After the precipitation occurred, the ET of the trees rose. This phenomenon is reflected at different depths. Figure 7 shows ET changes in locust trees and willows under drip irrigation conditions. After the drip irrigation occurred, the ET of the willows was relatively obvious, and the ET of the locust trees exhibited a smaller change.

3.4.2. Correlation between Tree Transpiration and SWC

Table 5 illustrates the correlation between the transpiration of three typical trees and SWC under precipitation conditions. At monitoring points at 1.1 m GD, poplars and willow trees predominantly utilized moisture at SWC60cm during precipitation, with a significant correlation (p < 0.01), while locust tree transpiration did not exhibit a significant correlation with soil water in any layers. At monitoring points at 4.4 m GD, poplar trees showed significant correlations with moisture at SWC30cm, SWC60cm, and SWC200cm during precipitation (p < 0.05). Locust trees were significantly correlated with SWC120cm and SWC200cm, and willows exhibited a more significant correlation with SWC160cm (p < 0.05). When the GD exceeded 100 m, poplars and locust trees were significantly correlated with SWC60cm during precipitation, while there was no significant relationship between SWC and transpiration in the remaining layers.
During the drip irrigation water retention period, the transpiration of poplars and locust trees did not show a significant correlation with the SWC of each layer, as indicated in Table 6. Poplars exhibited a negative correlation with SWC30cm, while locust tree transpiration showed a negative correlation with SWC30cm to SWC160cm.

3.5. Comprehensive Analysis of Factors Influencing Transpiration Impacts on Arbor

Twelve environmental factors, including air temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, net radiation, wind velocity at 2 m, VPD, SWC30cm, SWC60cm, WC90cm, SWC120cm, SWC160cm, and SWC200cm, were selected for analysis using an artificial neural network MLP model. The objective was to identify the ranking of importance of these factors, quantifying the degree of influence of SWC and meteorological factors on vegetation transpiration.
The MLP model for the three typical trees revealed varying responses to environmental factors (Figure 8). For the poplar, T, VPD, and RH were the most influential meteorological factors, with SWC30cm to SWC120cm having a limited impact on transpiration. The poplar exhibited higher sensitivity to changes in meteorological factors under irrigation-deficient conditions, and its root system tended to concentrate water absorption in deeper soil layers, making it less responsive to shallow soil moisture changes. For the locust tree, SWC30cm emerged as the most crucial factor affecting transpiration, followed by SWC60cm and SWC90cm. Meteorological factors like P, RH, and WS showed low sensitivity. Locust tree transpiration responded significantly to irrigation and surface soil moisture, with drip irrigation playing a more vital role than precipitation. The shallow depth of precipitation infiltration (<30 cm) had a limited effect on locust tree transpiration. For the willow, SWC60cm was identified as the primary environmental factor influencing transpiration, followed by T and SWC90cm. Meteorological factors like WS, VPD, and RH had limited effects. This suggested that the water content of surfaces SWC30cm to SWC90cm and SWC200cm had a more substantial impact on willow transpiration. Among meteorological factors, only temperature significantly controlled willow transpiration compared to others.

4. Discussion

4.1. Relationship between Tree Sap Flow and Meteorological Factors

This study has revealed a strong correlation between SFD and meteorological factors in three typical arbors, especially Rn, T, VPD, and RH. Current research in arid regions of northern China has consistently highlighted the significant impact of temperature, net radiation, relative humidity, and VPD on tree transpiration [22,23,24,26,47,48]. While variations in physiological anatomy and DBH among the different tree species influenced SFD characteristics, the response patterns to daily environmental changes were remarkably similar (Table 3). Notably, the three tree types exhibited positive correlations with Rn, T, and VPD, with VPD and Rn showing particular significance [24,49]. Our experiment indicated a significant influence of Rn on sap flow, supporting the idea that solar radiation induces stomatal opening, providing energy for sap flow and enhancing tree transmittance [47]. A positive feedback loop was observed between sap flow and VPD [50]. A logarithmic decrease in stomatal conductance is associated with rising VPDs, subsequently reducing transpiration [51]. Under general conditions, the increase in temperature will promote an increase in vegetation steaming. However, when a drought occurs, high temperatures and low precipitation can cause plants to be coerced by water limitations and restrict the steaming effect of trees [52]. Simultaneously, the transpiration of the three typical trees exhibited a significant negative correlation with RH. An increase in RH resulted in decreased water evaporation from the tree leaves’ surface area, thereby reducing tree transpiration [24]. Compared with previous research [22,24], it has been confirmed that, in the NYRIa, the transformation of the three typical trees has a strong correlation with Rn, T, VPD, and RH.
While the response relationships of the three typical trees to various meteorological factors remained consistent, the degree of response varied. The close relationship between tree SFD and the tree’s own biostructure characteristics under the same climatic conditions is evident. In addition to differences in DBH among the sample trees, variations in water transport organization were observed. Willows and locust trees, being ring-porous, displayed greater SFD compared to bulk-porous poplars, consistent with existing research [53]. This study also confirms the following phenomenon: willows exhibited the highest SFD, followed by locust trees, and poplars recorded the smallest SFD.

4.2. Relationship between Transpiration and SWC

In many tree species, the relationship between transpiration and SWC varies, with some studies suggesting no direct correlation in certain species [54]. Our study, however, revealed a significant impact of soil moisture on tree transpiration in the NYRIa. Despite varying soil moisture levels under different conditions, such as precipitation and artificial drip irrigation, tree transpiration consistently changed across all three typical vegetation types (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Precipitation and drip irrigation increase transpiration over a short period of time, which affects poplars more significantly. This finding emphasizes the significance of soil moisture in influencing tree transpiration, particularly in the NYRIa. These results align with prior research [24,54]. With a GD of 1.1 m, willows and poplars exhibit a notable increase in transpiration. Precipitation, in this scenario, primarily influences surface soil moisture content. Consequently, poplar trees demonstrate a strong correlation with SWC30cm and SWC60cm (Table 5). In contrast, locust trees show a minimal correlation with soil moisture content, and the influence of precipitation is limited. During drip irrigation, while there is a certain increase in willow tree transpiration, there is no significant correlation between transpiration and SWC (Table 6).
Hölscher et al. explored the linear relationship between sap flow and SWC in three tree species—Eurasian maple, European gooseberry, and European small-leaved linden. While a functional relationship exists, the coefficient of determination (R2) is only 0.26–0.41. Notably, there is no direct correlation between the sap flow of European ash trees and SWC [54]. Studies on sand willow in the Mu Us Desert indicate that it is predominantly influenced by meteorological factors during the growth period, utilizing deeper soil water (50–100 cm) only when subjected to winter water stress [55]. In the Minqin Oasis Desert transition zone, tamarisks’ daily sap flow showed no significant correlation with shallow soil moisture (0–40 cm) but did with middle soil (40–160 cm) [56]. Previous research in arid regions has suggested that vegetation sap flow is primarily driven by meteorological factors, with weak or no influence from soil moisture [14,57].
In our study, poplars and willows exhibited a significant positive correlation with shallow soil moisture content (SWC30cm and SWC60cm) under precipitation conditions. In the arid environment of the NYRIa, poplars and willows demonstrated a preference for absorbing shallow soil moisture, as indicated in Table 4. However, a noteworthy association between Poplars and SWC200cm was observed at 4.4 m, suggesting plants also absorb deep water during drought [21,58,59]. The water content in various soil layers plays a crucial role in ensuring the stable growth of trees [60]. The impact of SWC on transpiration was more pronounced for poplars and willows and less significant for locust trees in the NYRIa. This phenomenon is influenced by various factors, including meteorological conditions and GD.

5. Conclusions

This study assessed sap flow and transpiration patterns, as well as responses to environmental factors, in three typical tree species (poplar, locust tree, and willow) in the NYRIa. Variations in sap flow and transpiration characteristics among the tree species were identified. Monitoring revealed higher sap flow density and transpiration volume in willows compared to locust trees and poplars. Additionally, the sap flow density of the three tree types consistently responded to meteorological factors, showing positive correlations with Rn, T, and VPD, a negative correlation with RH, and an unclear correlation with WS. While transpiration in the three tree types changed under precipitation and drip irrigation, the correlation with SWC was limited. In conclusion, there are certain differences in the main factors affecting the transpiration of different types of trees.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Z. and X.L.; methodology, M.S. and X.L.; formal analysis, X.L. and M.S.; investigation, X.L., Y.Z. and Y.C.; resources, K.L., X.L. and M.S.; data curation, X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z. and X.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., J.Z. and X.L.; visualization, X.L. and Y.W.; supervision, J.Z. and Y.Z; project administration, J.Z.; funding acquisition, J.Z., Y.Z. and Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFC3200205) and the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (Nos. 52025093, 51979284, and 52109044).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bush, S.E.; Hultine, K.R.; Sperry, J.S.; Ehleringer, J.R. Calibration of thermal dissipation sap flow probes for ring- and diffuse-porous trees. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30, 1545–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Martin-StPaul, N.; Delzon, S.; Cochard, H. Plant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure. Ecol. Lett. 2017, 20, 1437–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Steppe, K.; De Pauw, D.J.W.; Doody, T.M.; Teskey, R.O. A comparison of sap flux density using thermal dissipation, heat pulse velocity and heat field deformation methods. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2010, 150, 1046–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Q.; Jia, X.; Shao, M.; Zhang, C.; Li, X.; Ma, C. Sap flow of black locust in response to short-term drought in southern Loess Plateau of China. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Flo, V.; Martinez-Vilalta, J.; Steppe, K.; Schuldt, B.; Poyatos, R. A synthesis of bias and uncertainty in sap flow methods. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 271, 362–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, J.; Li, D.; Fernández, J.-E.; Coleman, M.; Hu, W.; Di, N.; Zou, S.; Liu, Y.; Xi, B.; Clothier, B. Variations in water-balance components and carbon stocks in poplar plantations with differing water inputs over a whole rotation: Implications for sustainable forest management under climate change. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2022, 320, 108958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, X.; Li, X.; Hu, W.; Liu, J.; Di, N.; Duan, J.; Li, D.; Liu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wang, A.; et al. Long-term variation of the sap flow to tree diameter relation in a temperate poplar forest. J. Hydrol. 2023, 618, 129189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Čermák, J.; Deml, M.; Penka, M. A new method of sap flow rate determination in trees. Biol. Plant. 1973, 15, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Z.; Tang, J.; Caldwell, P.; Zhang, W. Biophysical control of whole tree transpiration under an urban environment in Northern China. J. Hydrol. 2011, 402, 388–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Di, N.; Xi, B.; Clothier, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.; Jia, L. Diurnal and nocturnal transpiration behaviors and their responses to groundwater-table fluctuations and meteorological factors of Populus tomentosa in the North China Plain. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 448, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Solum, J.; Malama, B. Estimating Canopy-Scale Evapotranspiration from Localized Sap Flow Measurements. Water 2022, 14, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, S.W.M.; Song, S.; Jia, L.; Zhang, Q. The transpiration water consumption characteristics of five typical urban trees in Yinchuan City and their impact on the main meteorological driving forces. J. Northeast. For. Univ. 2022, 50, 35–39. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, Z.; Ma, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Hua, Y.; Ou, S.; Fan, X. Provincial-Scale Research on the Eco-Security Structure in the Form of an Ecological Network of the Upper Yellow River: A Case Study of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Land 2023, 12, 1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ma, C.; Luo, Y.; Shao, M.; Li, X.; Sun, L.; Jia, X. Environmental controls on sap flow in black locust forest in Loess Plateau, China. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, S.; Yan, J.; Liu, X.; Wan, J. Response of vegetation restoration to climate change and human activities in Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia Region. J. Geogr. Sci. 2013, 23, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, S.; Yang, S.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Shi, M. NDVI-Based Analysis on the Influence of Climate Change and Human Activities on Vegetation Restoration in the Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia Region, Central China. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 11163–11182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lü, Y.; Fu, B.; Feng, X.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chang, R.; Sun, G.; Wu, B. A Policy-Driven Large Scale Ecological Restoration: Quantifying Ecosystem Services Changes in the Loess Plateau of China. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Li, Z.; Sun, X.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Zheng, W.; Zhai, B. Changes in nutrient balance, environmental effects, and green development after returning farmland to forests: A case study in Ningxia, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 735, 139370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xi, B.; Clothier, B.; Coleman, M.; Duan, J.; Hu, W.; Li, D.; Di, N.; Liu, Y.; Fu, J.; Li, J.; et al. Irrigation management in poplar (Populus spp.) plantations: A review. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 494, 119330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yao, L.; Zhao, M.; Xu, T. China’s Water-Saving Irrigation Management System: Policy, Implementation, and Challenge. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gazal, R.M.; Scott, R.L.; Goodrich, D.C.; Williams, D.G. Controls on transpiration in a semiarid riparian cottonwood forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2006, 137, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Asbjornsen, H.; Tomer, M.D.; Gomez-Cardenas, M.; Brudvig, L.A.; Greenan, C.M.; Schilling, K. Tree and stand transpiration in a Midwestern bur oak savanna after elm encroachment and restoration thinning. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 247, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Loranty, M.M.; Mackay, D.S.; Ewers, B.E.; Adelman, J.D.; Kruger, E.L. Environmental drivers of spatial variation in whole-tree transpiration in an aspen-dominated upland-to-wetland forest gradient. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44, W02441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chang, X.; Zhao, W.; He, Z. Radial pattern of sap flow and response to microclimate and soil moisture in Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia) in the upper Heihe River Basin of arid northwestern China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2014, 187, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, X.; Zhao, P.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Ouyang, L.; Zhu, L.; Ni, G. The sap flow-based assessment of atmospheric trace gas uptake by three forest types in subtropical China on different timescales. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 28431–28444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hayat, M.; Zha, T.; Jia, X.; Iqbal, S.; Qian, D.; Bourque, C.P.A.; Khan, A.; Tian, Y.; Bai, Y.; Liu, P.; et al. A multiple-temporal scale analysis of biophysical control of sap flow in Salix psammophila growing in a semiarid shrubland ecosystem of northwest China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2020, 288–289, 107985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rosado, B.H.P.; Oliveira, R.S.; Joly, C.A.; Aidar, M.P.M.; Burgess, S.S.O. Diversity in nighttime transpiration behavior of woody species of the Atlantic Rain Forest, Brazil. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2012, 158–159, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Du, S.; Wang, Y.-L.; Kume, T.; Zhang, J.-G.; Otsuki, K.; Yamanaka, N.; Liu, G.-B. Sapflow characteristics and climatic responses in three forest species in the semiarid Loess Plateau region of China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2011, 151, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dang, H.; Han, H.; Chen, S.; Li, M. A fragile soil moisture environment exacerbates the climate change-related impacts on the water use by Mongolian Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) in northern China: Long-term observations. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 251, 106857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xi, B.; Li, G.; Bloomberg, M.; Jia, L. The effects of subsurface irrigation at different soil water potential thresholds on the growth and transpiration of Populus tomentosa in the North China Plain. Aust. For. 2014, 77, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, X.; Yang, P.; Engel, B.A.; Li, P. The effects of rainfall and irrigation on cherry root water uptake under drip irrigation. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 197, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Burgess, S.S.O. Measuring transpiration responses to summer precipitation in a Mediterranean climate: A simple screening tool for identifying plant water-use strategies. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 127, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, L.; Zhang, Z. Effect of rainfall pulses on plant growth and transpiration of two xerophytic shrubs in a revegetated desert area: Tengger Desert, China. Catena 2016, 137, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, H.; Song, D.; Kong, J.; Mu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, X. Spatiotemporal Variation in Actual Evapotranspiration and the Influencing Factors in Ningxia from 2001 to 2020. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, W.; Jing, H.; Guo, X.; Dou, B.; Zhang, W. Analysis of Water and Salt Spatio-Temporal Distribution along Irrigation Canals in Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area, China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fan, J.; Zheng, J.; Wu, L.; Zhang, F. Estimation of daily maize transpiration using support vector machines, extreme gradient boosting, artificial and deep neural networks models. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 245, 106547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Plaut, J.A.; Wadsworth, W.D.; Pangle, R.; Yepez, E.A.; McDowell, N.G.; Pockman, W.T. Reduced transpiration response to precipitation pulses precedes mortality in a piñon-juniper woodland subject to prolonged drought. New Phytol. 2013, 200, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, C.; Li, X.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, H.; Wang, P.; Li, W.; Bai, Y.; Li, E.; Wang, S.; Miao, C.; et al. Responses of two desert shrubs to simulated rainfall pulses in an arid environment, northwestern China. Plant Soil 2019, 435, 239–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Iqbal, S.; Zha, T.; Jia, X.; Hayat, M.; Qian, D.; Bourque, C.P.A.; Tian, Y.; Bai, Y.; Liu, P.; Yang, R.; et al. Interannual variation in sap flow response in three xeric shrub species to periodic drought. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2021, 297, 108276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, R.; Yang, B.; Zio, E.; Chen, X. Artificial intelligence for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: A review. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2018, 108, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vitale, M.; Anselmi, S.; Salvatori, E.; Manes, F. New approaches to study the relationship between stomatal conductance and environmental factors under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 5385–5397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kamarudin, M.H.; Ismail, Z.H.; Saidi, N.B. Deep Learning Sensor Fusion in Plant Water Stress Assessment: A Comprehensive Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, G. Scale effect on spatial patterns of ecosystem services and associations among them in semi-arid area: A case study in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 598, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cadavid Restrepo, A.M.; Yang, Y.R.; Hamm, N.A.S.; Gray, D.J.; Barnes, T.S.; Williams, G.M.; Soares Magalhães, R.J.; McManus, D.P.; Guo, D.; Clements, A.C.A. Land cover change during a period of extensive landscape restoration in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 598, 669–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fan, G.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Sang, W.; Zhao, L.; Xu, M. Ecological environmental effects of Yellow River irrigation revealed by isotope and ion hydrochemistry in the Yinchuan Plain, Northwest China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 135, 108574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mandal, U.; Gowda, V.; Ghosh, A.; Bose, A.; Bhaumik, U.; Chatterjee, B.; Pal, T.K. Optimization of metformin HCl 500 mg sustained release matrix tablets using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based on Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP) model. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 56, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ma, J.-X.; Chen, Y.-N.; Li, W.-H.; Huang, X.; Zhu, C.-G.; Ma, X.-D. Sap flow characteristics of four typical species in desert shelter forest and their responses to environmental factors. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 67, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tong, Y.; Liu, J.; Han, X.; Zhang, T.; Dong, Y.; Wu, M.; Qin, S.; Wei, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, Y. Radial and seasonal variation of sap flow and its response to meteorological factors in sandy Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations in the Three North Shelterbelt of China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2023, 328, 109239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, D.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Wei, X.; Wang, X. Response of relative sap flow to meteorological factors under different soil moisture conditions in rainfed jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) plantations in semiarid Northwest China. Agric. Water Manag. 2014, 136, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Oren, R.; Pataki, D.E. Transpiration in response to variation in microclimate and soil moisture in southeastern deciduous forests. Oecologia 2001, 127, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Whitehead, D. Regulation of stomatal conductance and transpiration in forest canopies. Tree Physiol. 1998, 18, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, J.; Yu, P.; Wan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Liu, B.; Pan, L.; Xu, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X. The differential responses of tree transpiration to seasonal drought among competitive pressures in a larch plantation of northwest China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2023, 336, 109468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zimmermann, M.H. Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1983; p. 143. [Google Scholar]
  54. Hölscher, D.; Koch, O.; Korn, S.; Leuschner, C. Sap flux of five co-occurring tree species in a temperate broad-leaved forest during seasonal soil drought. Trees 2005, 19, 628–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, Y.; He, J.; He, Y.; Gao, W.; Zheng, C.; Liu, X. Seasonal hydrological traits in Salix psammophila and its responses to soil moisture and meteorological factors in desert areas. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 136, 108626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, F.; You, Q.; Xue, X.; Peng, F.; Huang, C.; Ma, S.; Pan, J.; Shi, Y.; Chen, X. The Stem Sap Flow and Water Sources for Tamarix ramosissima in an Artificial Shelterbelt With a Deep Groundwater Table in Northwest China. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 794084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Han, C.; Chen, N.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.; Khan, S.; Lu, K.; Li, Y.; Dong, X.; Zhao, C. Sap flow and responses to meteorological about the Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation in Gansu Xinlong mountain, northwestern China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 451, 117519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bucci, S.J.; Scholz, F.G.; Goldstein, G.; Hoffmann, W.A.; Meinzer, F.C.; Franco, A.C.; Giambelluca, T.; Miralles-Wilhelm, F. Controls on stand transpiration and soil water utilization along a tree density gradient in a Neotropical savanna. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2008, 148, 839–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Vincke, C.; Thiry, Y. Water table is a relevant source for water uptake by a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stand: Evidences from continuous evapotranspiration and water table monitoring. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2008, 148, 1419–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, X.; Huo, X.; Li, X.; Xu, C.; Li, Z.; Xu, C.; Xi, B.; Wu, X. Variations of deep water uptake and water use efficiency indicated divergence in tree growth stability. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 544, 121131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the study area and hydrological station sites: (a) Ningxia; (b) Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation area.
Figure 1. Location of the study area and hydrological station sites: (a) Ningxia; (b) Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation area.
Forests 15 00090 g001
Figure 2. Architecture of the MLP model feed-forward network used in this study. Abbreviations: T, temperature; P, precipitation; RH, relative humidity; Rn, net radiation; WS, wind speed; VPD, vapor pressure difference; SWC30cm, soil moisture content at 30 cm underground.
Figure 2. Architecture of the MLP model feed-forward network used in this study. Abbreviations: T, temperature; P, precipitation; RH, relative humidity; Rn, net radiation; WS, wind speed; VPD, vapor pressure difference; SWC30cm, soil moisture content at 30 cm underground.
Forests 15 00090 g002
Figure 3. Changes in meteorological factors. Abbreviations: RH, relative humidity; VPD, vapor pressure difference; WS, wind speed; P, precipitation; Rn, net radiation; T, temperature.
Figure 3. Changes in meteorological factors. Abbreviations: RH, relative humidity; VPD, vapor pressure difference; WS, wind speed; P, precipitation; Rn, net radiation; T, temperature.
Forests 15 00090 g003
Figure 4. Month-by-month sap flow change curves of different types of trees. Abbreviations: SFD, sap flow density.
Figure 4. Month-by-month sap flow change curves of different types of trees. Abbreviations: SFD, sap flow density.
Forests 15 00090 g004
Figure 5. Transpiration water consumption process of three typical trees. Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration.
Figure 5. Transpiration water consumption process of three typical trees. Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration.
Forests 15 00090 g005
Figure 6. Changes in transpiration during precipitation. (a) changes in transpiration of poplar, locust tree and willow at a GD 1.1m. (b) changes in transpiration of poplar and locust tree at a GD exceeded 100 m. (c) changes in transpiration of poplars at a GD 4.4m. (d) changes in transpiration of locust tree and willow at a GD 4.4m. Abbreviations: P, precipitation; ET, evapotranspiration.
Figure 6. Changes in transpiration during precipitation. (a) changes in transpiration of poplar, locust tree and willow at a GD 1.1m. (b) changes in transpiration of poplar and locust tree at a GD exceeded 100 m. (c) changes in transpiration of poplars at a GD 4.4m. (d) changes in transpiration of locust tree and willow at a GD 4.4m. Abbreviations: P, precipitation; ET, evapotranspiration.
Forests 15 00090 g006
Figure 7. Changes in transpiration during drip irrigation. (a) changes in transpiration of locust tree and willow during the first drip irrigation. (b) changes in transpiration of locust tree and willow during the second drip irrigation. Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration.
Figure 7. Changes in transpiration during drip irrigation. (a) changes in transpiration of locust tree and willow during the first drip irrigation. (b) changes in transpiration of locust tree and willow during the second drip irrigation. Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration.
Forests 15 00090 g007
Figure 8. Ranking of importance of environmental factors for three typical tree MLP models. Abbreviations: T, temperature; P, precipitation; RH, relative humidity; Rn, net radiation; WS, wind speed; VPD, vapor pressure difference; SWC30cm, soil moisture content at 30 cm underground.
Figure 8. Ranking of importance of environmental factors for three typical tree MLP models. Abbreviations: T, temperature; P, precipitation; RH, relative humidity; Rn, net radiation; WS, wind speed; VPD, vapor pressure difference; SWC30cm, soil moisture content at 30 cm underground.
Forests 15 00090 g008
Table 1. Statistical table for monitoring tree samples. Abbreviations: DBH, diameter at breast height; CW, crown width.
Table 1. Statistical table for monitoring tree samples. Abbreviations: DBH, diameter at breast height; CW, crown width.
StateNumberVarieties of TreesDBH
(cm)
Height (m)CW
(m × m)
TDP (mm)
Ningxia central stationNC-H1locust tree7.85.72.9 × 3.7TDP30
NC-H2locust tree7.95.93.4 × 4.7TDP30
NC-Y1poplar16.816.52.2 × 2.4TDP50
NC-Y2poplar22.718.82.9 × 3.6TDP 80
NC-L1willow14.510.14.7 × 6.3TDP 50
NC-L2willow22.611.79.2 × 10.8TDP 50
NC-H3locust tree8.816.23.6 × 4.1TDP 30
NC-H4locust tree12.89.53.2 × 4.5TDP 30
NC-Y3poplar24.218.72.5 × 4.5TDP 80
NC-Y4poplar32.323.53.1 × 2.8TDP 80
NC-Y5poplar33.829.43.3 × 2.2TDP 80
NC-Y6poplar4229.65.5 × 4.4TDP 100
Huinongqu stationHN_L1willow14.98.93.4 × 4.3TDP 50
HN_L2willow11.06.81.8 × 2.4TDP 30
HN_Y1poplar12.512.12.5 × 4.5TDP 50
HN_Y2poplar7.98.92.1 × 3.0TDP 30
Suyukou stationSY_Y1poplar13.88.92.5 × 4.5TDP 50
SY_Y2poplar16.09.12.7 × 4.3TDP 50
SY_H1locust tree7.06.32.2 × 2.7TDP 30
SY_H2locust tree7.26.42.0 × 2.8TDP 30
Forestpark stationFP_Y1poplar18.07.13.4 × 3.0TDP 50
FP_Y2poplar12.07.23.3 × 2.9TDP 50
FP_H1locust tree12.46.53.7 × 4.3TDP 30
FP_H2locust tree10.06.32.9 × 3.1TDP 30
Shizuishan stationSZS_Y1poplar22.913.42.7 × 4.3TDP 80
SZS_Y2poplar30.916.03.4 × 3.0TDP 80
SZS_H1locust tree12.46.03.8 × 4.2TDP 50
SZS_H2locust tree13.78.23.6 × 4.4TDP 50
SZS_L1willow35.712.67.6 × 9.3TDP 80
Table 2. Starting time of three typical arbor sap flows during the growing season. Abbreviations: DBH, diameter at breast height; CW, crown width.
Table 2. Starting time of three typical arbor sap flows during the growing season. Abbreviations: DBH, diameter at breast height; CW, crown width.
NumberDBH
(cm)
CW (m × m)AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
NC-Y324.22.5 × 4.5\5:305:506:106:307:007:50
NC-Y432.33.1 × 2.8\\5:405:506:106:507:30
NC-H17.822.9 × 3.7\6:206:507:108:008:309:00
NC-H27.953.4 × 4.7\6:106:306:507:107:508:10
NC-L115.454.7 × 6.36:506:106:006:006:207:208:10
NC-L222.609.2 × 10.86:406:106:006:006:207:107:50
Table 3. Correlation of SFDs of three typical trees with Rn, T, RH, VPD, and WS. Abbreviations: GD, groundwater depth; Rn, net radiation; T, temperature; RH, relative humidity; VPD, vapor pressure difference; WS, wind speed.
Table 3. Correlation of SFDs of three typical trees with Rn, T, RH, VPD, and WS. Abbreviations: GD, groundwater depth; Rn, net radiation; T, temperature; RH, relative humidity; VPD, vapor pressure difference; WS, wind speed.
GDVarieties of TreesRnTRHVPDWS
1.1 mpoplar0.854 **0.735 **−0.622 **0.819 **0.135 *
locust tree0.502 **0.294 **−0.559 **0.407 **0.053
willow0.891 **0.813 **−0.501 **0.754 **0.034
4.4 mpoplar0.319 **0.185 *−0.155 *0.151 *−0.145 *
locust tree0.703 **0.535 **−0.646 **0.621 **0.105
willow0.435 **0.148 *−0.262 **0.175 *0.103
>100 mpoplar0.813 **0.683 **−0.609 **0.774 **0.040
locust tree0.807 **0.765 **−0.417 **0.752 **−0.036
** represents p < 0.01 level of significance, * represents p < 0.05 level of significance.
Table 4. Changes in SWC after precipitation and drip irrigation.
Table 4. Changes in SWC after precipitation and drip irrigation.
Water SourceSoil Depth (cm)Soil Moisture Content before Precipitation (%)Maximum Moisture Content after Precipitation (%)Increment in Moisture Content (%)
Precipitation304.7515.0910.34
604.128.654.53
900.550.770.22
12000\
1602.032.03\
2000.200.20\
First drip irrigation304.6418.3513.71
604.1217.7413.62
900.4514.3514.13
12008.308.08
1604.7616.2311.47
2000.518.958.45
Second drip irrigation304.6017.4312.83
604.0716.6112.54
900.6312.1711.54
12008.698.69
1601.8315.2913.46
20007.747.74
Table 5. Correlation between transpiration and SWC (under precipitation conditions) of three typical trees. Abbreviations: GD, groundwater depth; SWC30cm, soil moisture content at 30 cm underground.
Table 5. Correlation between transpiration and SWC (under precipitation conditions) of three typical trees. Abbreviations: GD, groundwater depth; SWC30cm, soil moisture content at 30 cm underground.
GDVarieties of TreesSWC30cmSWC60cmSWC90cmSWC120cmSWC160mSWC200cm
1.1 mpoplar0.501 *0.550 **−0.1310.1920.111−0.150
locust tree0.168−0.099−0.0460.261−0.032−0.050
willow0.588 **0.740 **0.0680.226−0.016−0.120
4.4 mpoplar0.480 *0.514 *−0.273−0.1570.3530.583 **
locust tree0.1710.122−0.351−0.535 *−0.031−0.706 **
willow0.2360.3910.1730.1670.525 *−0.101
>100 mpoplar0.0410.784 **0.476−0.412−0.1480.154
locust tree0.1870.491 *0.145−0.035−0.0970.437
** represents p < 0.01 level of significance, * represents p < 0.05 level of significance.
Table 6. Correlation between transpiration and SWC (under drip irrigation) of three typical trees. Abbreviations: GD, groundwater depth; SWC30cm, soil moisture content at 30 cm underground.
Table 6. Correlation between transpiration and SWC (under drip irrigation) of three typical trees. Abbreviations: GD, groundwater depth; SWC30cm, soil moisture content at 30 cm underground.
GDVarieties of TreesSWC30cmSWC60cmSWC90cmSWC120cmSWC160mSWC200cm
4.4 mlocust tree−0.0140.0330.0690.1930.2180.097
willow−0.293−0.304−0.186−0.152−0.1460.100
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Zhai, J.; Sun, M.; Liu, K.; Zhao, Y.; Cao, Y.; Wang, Y. Characteristics of Changes in Sap Flow-Based Transpiration of Poplars, Locust Trees, and Willows and Their Response to Environmental Impact Factors. Forests 2024, 15, 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010090

AMA Style

Li X, Zhai J, Sun M, Liu K, Zhao Y, Cao Y, Wang Y. Characteristics of Changes in Sap Flow-Based Transpiration of Poplars, Locust Trees, and Willows and Their Response to Environmental Impact Factors. Forests. 2024; 15(1):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xing, Jiaqi Zhai, Meng Sun, Kuan Liu, Yong Zhao, Yankun Cao, and Yong Wang. 2024. "Characteristics of Changes in Sap Flow-Based Transpiration of Poplars, Locust Trees, and Willows and Their Response to Environmental Impact Factors" Forests 15, no. 1: 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010090

APA Style

Li, X., Zhai, J., Sun, M., Liu, K., Zhao, Y., Cao, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). Characteristics of Changes in Sap Flow-Based Transpiration of Poplars, Locust Trees, and Willows and Their Response to Environmental Impact Factors. Forests, 15(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010090

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop