Factors Influencing the Change of Phyllosphere Microbial Community of Three Populus spp. in the Same Habitat
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Experimental Procedures and Materials
2.1. The Site for Conducting Experiments
2.2. Gathering and Processing of Samples
2.3. DNA Extraction and RNA Gene Amplification
2.4. Determination of Physical and Chemical Properties of Leaves
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Variation in the Chemical Properties of the Leaves of Three Species of Populus spp.
3.2. Diversity of Phyllosphere Fungal and Bacterial Communities in Three Different Populus spp.
3.3. Alpha Diversity Index of Fungal and Bacterial Communities in Three Populus spp.
3.4. Composition of Phyllosphere Fungal and Bacterial Communities of Three Different Populus spp.
3.5. Correlation Analysis between the Composition Structure and Nutrient Content of Phyllosphere Fungal and Bacterial Communities in Different Varieties of Populus spp.
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Nelson, E.B. The seed microbiome: Origins, interactions, and impacts. Plant Soil. Int. J. Plant-Soil. Relatsh. 2018, 422, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reinhold-Hurek, B.; Bünger, W.; Burbano, C.S.; Sabale, M.; Hurek, T. Roots Shaping Their Microbiome: Global Hotspots for Microbial Activity. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2015, 53, 403–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, K.; Lv, W.Y.; Ren, H.Z.; Xiong, F.; Zhang, Y.T.; Zhang, J.H.; Tong, Z.K.; Wang, X.C.; Wang, Y.C. Small world but large differences: Cultivar-specific secondary metabolite-mediated phyllosphere fungal homeostasis in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Plant Soil. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vorholt, J.A. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 828–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, M.; del Carmen Rocha-Granados, M.; Glick, B.R.; Santoyo, G. Microbiome engineering to improve biocontrol and plant growth-promoting mechanisms. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 208, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
- Mendes, R.; Garbeva, P.; Raaijmakers, J.M. The rhizosphere microbiome: Significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 634–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vandenkoornhuyse, P.; Quaiser, A.; Duhamel, M.; Le Van, A.; Dufresne, A. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 1196–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashir, I.; War, A.F.; Rafiq, I.; Reshi, Z.A.; Rashid, I.; Shouche, Y.S. Phyllosphere microbiome: Diversity and functions. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 254, 126888. [Google Scholar]
- Morris, C.E.; Kinkel, L.L. Fifty years of phyllosphere microbiology: Significant contributions to research in related fields. Phyllosphere Microbiol. 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Lindow, S.E.; Brandl, M.T. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 1875–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bulgarelli, D.; Schlaeppi, K.; Spaepen, S.; Themaat, E.V.L.v.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Structure and Functions of the Bacterial Microbiota of Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 807–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guttman, D.S.; McHardy, A.C.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Microbial genome-enabled insights into plant-microorganism interactions., Microbial genome-enabled insights into plant-microorganism interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 797–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kishore, G.K.; Pande, S.; Podile, A.R. Biological Control of Late Leaf Spot of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with Chitinolytic Bacteria. Phytopathology 2005, 95, 1157–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ab Razak, N.; Gange, A.C.; Currie, A.F.; Sutton, B.C.; Mansor, A. Factors affecting the foliar endophyte community in the invasive weed, Impatiens glandulifera. Fungal Ecol. 2024, 70, 101356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krimm, U.; Abanda-Nkpwatt, D.; Schwab, W.; Schreiber, L. Epiphytic microorganisms on strawberry plants (Fragaria ananassa cv. Elsanta): Identification of bacterial isolates and analysis of their interaction with leaf surfaces. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2005, 53, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burch, A.Y.; Browne, P.J.; Dunlap Christopher, A.; Price, N.P.; Lindow, S.E. Comparison of biosurfactant detection methods reveals hydrophobic surfactants and contact-regulated production. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 2681–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hacquard, S.; Wang, E.; Slater, H.; Martin, F. Impact of global change on the plant microbiome. Spec. Issue 2022, 234, 1907–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Romero, F.M.; Marina, M.; Pieckenstain, F.L. Novel components of leaf bacterial communities of field-grown tomato plants and their potential for plant growth promotion and biocontrol of tomato diseases. Res. Microbiol. 2016, 167, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.; Nomura, K.; Wang, X.; Sohrabi, R.; Xu, J.; Yao, L.; Paasch, B.C.; Ma, L.I.; Kremer, J.; Cheng, Y.; et al. A plant genetic network for preventing dysbiosis in the phyllosphere. Nature 2020, 580, 653–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trivedi, P.; Leach, J.E.; Tringe, S.G.; Sa, T.; Singh, B.K. Author Correction: Plant-microbiome interactions: From community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 19, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B. Research progress on soil microbial diversity technology. In Second International Conference on Biological Engineering and Medical Science (ICBioMed 2022); SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2023; Volume 12611, pp. 22–28. [Google Scholar]
- Li, P.; Wu, X.J.; Gao, F. Ozone pollution, water deficit stress and time drive poplar phyllospheric bacterial community structure. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 262, 115148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dinu, L.D.; Bach, S. Induction of viable but nonculturable Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the phyllosphere of lettuce: A food safety risk factor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 8295–8302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gal, M.; Preston, G.M.; Massey, R.C.; Spiers, A.J.; Rainey, P.B. Genes encoding a cellulosic polymer contribute toward the ecological success of Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 on plant surfaces. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12, 3109–3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baldotto, L.E.B.; Olivares, F.L. Phylloepiphytic interaction between bacteria and different plant species in a tropical agricultural system. Can. J. Microbiol. 2008, 54, 918–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schreiber, L.; Krimm, U.; Knoll, D.; Sayed, M.; Auling, G.; Kroppenstedt, R.M. Plant-microbe interactions: Identification of epiphytic bacteria and their ability to alter leaf surface permeability. New Phytol. 2005, 166, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Helfrich, E.J.N.; Vogel, C.M.; Ueoka, R.; Schäfer, M.; Ryffel, F.; Müller, D.B.; Probst, S.; Kreuzer, M.; PIEL, J.; Vorholt, J.A. Bipartite interactions, antibiotic production and biosynthetic potential of the Arabidopsis leaf microbiome. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 909–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fürnkranz, M.; Wanek, W.; Richter, A.; Abell, G.; Rasche, F.; Sessitsch, A. Nitrogen fixation by phyllosphere bacteria associated with higher plants and their colonizing epiphytes of a tropical lowland rainforest of Costa Rica. ISME J. 2008, 2, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meyer, K.M.; Leveau, J.H.J. Microbiology of the phyllosphere: A playground for testing ecological concepts. Oecologia 2012, 168, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Redford, A.J.; Bowers, R.M.; Knight, R.; Linhart, Y.; Fierer, N. The ecology of the phyllosphere: Geographic and phylogenetic variability in the distribution of bacteria on tree leaves. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 2885–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bálint, M.; Tiffin, P.; Hallström, B.; O’Hara, R.B.; Olson, M.S.; Fankhauser, J.D.; Piepenbring, M.; Schmitt, I. Host genotype shapes the foliar fungal microbiome of balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera). PLoS ONE 2018, 8, e53987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finkel, O.; Burch, A.; Lindow, S.E.; Post, A.F.; Belkin, S. Geographical location determines the population structure in phyllosphere microbial communities of a salt-excreting desert tree. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 7647–7655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rastogi, G.; Sbodio, A.; Tech, J.J.; Suslow, T.V.; Coaker, G.L.; Leveau, J.H.J. Leaf microbiota in an agroecosystem: Spatiotemporal variation in bacterial community composition on field-grown lettuce. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1812–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Finkel, O.M.; Burch, A.Y.; Elad, T.; Huse, S.M.; Lindow, S.E.; Post, A.F.; Belkin, S. Distance-Decay Relationships Partially Determine Diversity Patterns of Phyllosphere Bacteria on Tamarix Trees across the Sonoran Desert Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 7818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardoim, P.R.; Van Overbeek, L.S.; Berg, G.; Pirttilä, A.M.; Compant, S.; Campisano, A.; Döring, M.; Sessitsch, A. The Hidden World within Plants: Ecological and Evolutionary Considerations for Defining Functioning of Microbial Endophytes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. MMB 2015, 79, 293–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koskimäki, J.J.; Pirttilä, A.M.; Ihantola, E.L.; Halonen, O.; Frank, A.C. The intracellular Scots pine shoot symbiont Methylobacterium extorquens DSM13060 aggregates around the host nucleus and encodes eukaryote-like proteins. mBio 2015, 6, e00039-15. [Google Scholar]
- Bodenhausen, N.; Horton, M.W.; Bergelson, J. Bacterial communities associated with the leaves and the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2018, 8, e56329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Osono, T.; Bhatta, B.K.; Takeda, H. Phyllosphere fungi on living and decomposing leaves of giant dogwood. Mycoscience 2004, 45, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whipps, J.M.; Hand, P.; Pink, D.; Bending, G.D. Phyllosphere microbiology with special reference to diversity and plant genotype. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 105, 1744–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, L.; Yao, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, B.; Xie, F. Effect of drought stress on sugar metabolism in leaves and roots of soybean seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 146, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Song, X.; Chang, S.X.; Peng, C.; Xiao, W.; Zhang, J.; Xiang, W.; Li, Y.; Wang, W. Nitrogen depositions increase soil respiration and decrease temperature sensitivity in a Moso bamboo forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 268, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knief, C.; Ramette, A.; Frances, L.; Alonso-Blanco, C.; Vorholt, J.A. Site and plant species are important determinants of the Methylobacterium community composition in the plant phyllosphere. ISME J. 2010, 4, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stone, B.W.G.; Jackson, C.R. Biogeographic Patterns Between Bacterial Phyllosphere Communities of the Southern Magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora) in a Small Forest. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 71, 954–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Copeland, J.K.; Yuan, L.J.; Layeghifard, M.; Wang, P.W.; Guttman, D.S. Seasonal community succession of the phyllosphere microbiome. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. MPMI 2015, 28, 274–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qian, X.; Li, S.C.; Wu, B.W.; Wang, Y.L.; Ji, N.N.; Yao, H.; Cai, H.Y.; Shi, M.M.; Zhang, D.X. Mainland and island populations of Mussaenda kwangtungensis differ in their phyllosphere fungal community composition and network structure. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bao, L.; Gu, L.; Sun, B.; Cai, W.; Zhang, S.; Zhuang, G.; Bai, Z.; Zhuang, X. Seasonal variation of epiphytic bacteria in the phyllosphere of Gingko biloba, Pinus bungeana and Sabina chinensis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiaa017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kembel, S.W.; O’Connor, T.K.; Arnold, H.K.; Hubbell, S.P.; Wright, S.J.; Green, J.L. Relationships between phyllosphere bacterial communities and plant functional traits in a neotropical forest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 13715–13720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leveau, J.H. A from the leaf: Latest research to inform our understanding of the phyllosphere microbiome. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019, 49, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lajoie, G.; Maglione, R.; Kembel, S.W. Adaptive matching between phyllosphere bacteria and their tree hosts in a neotropical forest. Microbiome 2020, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wagner, M.R.; Lundberg, D.S.; del Rio, T.G.; Tringe, S.G.; Dangl, J.L.; Mitchell-Olds, T. Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cordier, T.; Robin, C.; Capdevielle, X.; Desprez-Loustau, M.L.; Vacher, C. Spatial variability of phyllosphere fungal assemblages: Genetic distance predominates over geographic distance in a European beech stand (Fagus sylvatica). Fungal Ecol. 2012, 5, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, R.K.P.; Karamanoli, K.; Vokou, D. Bacterial colonization of the phyllosphere of mediterranean perennial species as influenced by leaf structural and chemical features. Microb. Ecol. 2005, 50, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruppel, S.; Krumbein, A.; Schreiner, M. Composition of the phyllospheric microbial populations on vegetable plants with different glucosinolate and carotenoid compositions. Microb. Ecol. 2008, 56, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bodenhausen, N.; Bortfeld-Miller, M.; Ackermann, M.; Vorholt, J.A. A synthetic community approach reveals plant genotypes affecting the phyllosphere microbiota. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kembel, S.W.; Mueller, R.C. Plant traits and taxonomy drive host associations in tropical phyllosphere fungal communities. Botany 2014, 92, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivakumar, N.; Sathishkumar, R.; Selvakumar, G.; Shyamkumar, R.; Arjunekumar, K. Phyllospheric microbiomes: Diversity, ecological significance and biotechnological applications. Nat. Public Health Emerg. Collect. 2020, 25, 113–172. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, Z.Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Degryse, F.; Hang, C.D.; Hou, C.H.; Wu, L.Q.; Jiang, R.F.; Mclaughlin, M.J.; Zhang, F.S. Magnesium-fortified phosphate fertilizers improve nutrient uptake and plant growth without reducing phosphorus availability. Pedosphere 2022, 32, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konvalinková, T.; Püschel, D.; Řezáčová, V.; Gryndlerová, H.; Jansa, J. Carbon flow from plant to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is reduced under phosphorus fertilization. Plant Soil 2017, 419, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rastogi, G.; Coaker, G.L.; Leveau, J. New insights into the structure and function of phyllosphere microbiota through high-throughput molecular approaches. Fems Microbiol. Lett. 2013, 348, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Delmotte, N.; Knief, C.; Chaffron, S.; Innerebner, G.; Roschitzki, B.; Schlapbach, R.; von Mering, C.; Vorholt, J.A. Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 16428–16433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steinauer, K.; Tilman, D.; Wragg, P.D.; Cesarz, S.; Cowles, J.M.; Pritsch, K.; Reich, P.B.; Weisser, W.W.; Eisenhauer, N. Plant diversity effects on soil microbial functions and enzymes are stronger than warming in a grassland experiment. Ecology 2015, 96, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, C.; Zhu, Y.G.; Wang, J.T.; Singh, B.; Han, L.L.; Shen, J.P.; Li, P.P.; Wang, G.B.; Wu, C.F.; Ge, A.H.; et al. Host selection shapes crop microbiome assembly and network complexity. New Phytol. 2020, 229, 1091–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim MinCheol, K.M.; Dharmesh Singh, D.S.; Ang LaiHoe, A.L.; Go RuSea, G.R.; Raha Abdul Rahim, R.A.R.; Ainuddin, A.N.; Chun JongSik, C.J.; Adams, J.M. Distinctive phyllosphere bacterial communities in tropical trees. Microb. Ecol. 2012, 63, 674–681. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Total Nitrogen, g kg−1 | Total Phosphorus, g kg−1 | Soluble Sugar, mg g−1 | Starch, mg g−1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
YA | 0.68 ± 0.11 A | 5.31 ± 0.24 B | 128.95 ± 0.41 B | 586.56 ± 15.18 A |
YB | 0.45 ± 0.17 A | 5.96 ± 0.21 A | 213.74 ± 42.62 A | 530.14 ± 22.85 B |
YC | 0.47 ± 0.35 A | 4.90 ± 0.20 B | 167.96 ± 27.17 AB | 562.73 ± 42.69 AB |
p | 0.300 | <0.001 | 0.006 | 0.033 |
f | 1.366 | 16.193 | 6.86 | 4.052 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yin, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, D.; Wang, R.; Cong, X.; Pang, Z.; Peng, Y.; Ge, Y.; Zhu, W.; Ding, C. Factors Influencing the Change of Phyllosphere Microbial Community of Three Populus spp. in the Same Habitat. Forests 2024, 15, 1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15081453
Yin X, Zhang W, Li D, Wang R, Cong X, Pang Z, Peng Y, Ge Y, Zhu W, Ding C. Factors Influencing the Change of Phyllosphere Microbial Community of Three Populus spp. in the Same Habitat. Forests. 2024; 15(8):1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15081453
Chicago/Turabian StyleYin, Xin, Weixi Zhang, Dan Li, Ran Wang, Xinyao Cong, Zhongyi Pang, Yanhui Peng, Yang Ge, Wenxu Zhu, and Changjun Ding. 2024. "Factors Influencing the Change of Phyllosphere Microbial Community of Three Populus spp. in the Same Habitat" Forests 15, no. 8: 1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15081453