Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Characterization of Fenofibrate Microparticles with Surface-Active Additives: Application of a Supercritical Fluid-Assisted Spray-Drying Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Formulation and Evaluation of Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery System Derived Tablet Containing Sertraline
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Fluorinated Spermine and Small Molecule PEI to Deliver Anti-PD-L1 and Anti-VEGF siRNA for Highly Efficient Tumor Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Formulation and Development of Oral Fast-Dissolving Films Loaded with Nanosuspension to Augment Paroxetine Bioavailability: In Vitro Characterization, Ex Vivo Permeation, and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation in Healthy Human Volunteers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Mudie et al. In Vitro-In Silico Tools for Streamlined Development of Acalabrutinib Amorphous Solid Dispersion Tablets. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1257

Global Research & Development, Lonza, Bend, OR 97703, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Pharmaceutics Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(12), 2059; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13122059
Submission received: 19 November 2021 / Revised: 24 November 2021 / Accepted: 24 November 2021 / Published: 2 December 2021
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1].
There was an error in the original article in the Abstract section, where it was stated that the absolute average fold error (AAFE) of the in silico predictions for AUC0-inf for Calquence + famotidine was ≈3. A correction has been made to the abstract section: “In silico simulations of the HPMCAS-H ASD tablet and Calquence capsule provided good in vivo study prediction accuracy using a bottom–up approach (absolute average fold error of AUC0-inf < 2)”.
There was an error in the original article in the Results section (Section 3.6, paragraph 1), where it was stated that AAFE of the in silico predictions for AUC0-inf for the Calquence capsule + famotidine treatment was not <2. A correction has been made in the original article in the Results section (Section 3.6, paragraph 1): “The AAFE of the in silico predictions for AUC0-inf, Cmax, Tmax, and Cp versus time for all formulation treatments were <2-fold (ideal value = 1) with the exception of Cp versus time for the Calquence capsule + famotidine treatment, indicating that the in silico prediction framework is sufficient for simulating acalabrutinib blood plasma concentrations within this in vivo study”.
In the original article, there were mistakes in Table 4 as published, where AAFE for AUC0-inf for the Calquence capsule + pentagastrin was listed as 1.2 and AAFE for AUC0-inf for Calquence capsule + famotidine was listed as 3.6. The corrected Table 4 appears below.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Mudie, D.M.; Stewart, A.M.; Rosales, J.A.; Adam, M.S.; Morgen, M.M.; Vodak, D.T. In Vitro-In Silico Tools for Streamlined Development of Acalabrutinib Amorphous Solid Dispersion Tablets. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 4. Noncompartmental analysis comparing simulated (sim) versus observed (obs) data for all formulation treatments in the dog study. Absolute average fold error (AAFE) was calculated for AUC0-inf, Cmax, Tmax, and Cp versus time to determine the accuracy of the in silico prediction exercise (ideal value = 1).
Table 4. Noncompartmental analysis comparing simulated (sim) versus observed (obs) data for all formulation treatments in the dog study. Absolute average fold error (AAFE) was calculated for AUC0-inf, Cmax, Tmax, and Cp versus time to determine the accuracy of the in silico prediction exercise (ideal value = 1).
FormulationAUC0-inf
(ng h/mL)
Cmax (ng/mL)Tmax (h)AAFE
ObsSimObsSimObsSimAUC0-infCmaxTmaxCp vs. Time
ASD tablet,
pentagastrin
81619766333237270.90.91.21.21.61.3
ASD tablet,
famotidine
75799555344335080.91.61.31.21.81.6
Calquence
capsule,
pentagastrin
83658607448031100.80.91.11.41.31.3
Calquence
capsule,
famotidine
311230963556481.61.21.61.91.73.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mudie, D.M.; Stewart, A.M.; Rosales, J.A.; Adam, M.S.; Morgen, M.M.; Vodak, D.T. Correction: Mudie et al. In Vitro-In Silico Tools for Streamlined Development of Acalabrutinib Amorphous Solid Dispersion Tablets. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1257. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13122059

AMA Style

Mudie DM, Stewart AM, Rosales JA, Adam MS, Morgen MM, Vodak DT. Correction: Mudie et al. In Vitro-In Silico Tools for Streamlined Development of Acalabrutinib Amorphous Solid Dispersion Tablets. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1257. Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13(12):2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13122059

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mudie, Deanna M., Aaron M. Stewart, Jesus A. Rosales, Molly S. Adam, Michael M. Morgen, and David T. Vodak. 2021. "Correction: Mudie et al. In Vitro-In Silico Tools for Streamlined Development of Acalabrutinib Amorphous Solid Dispersion Tablets. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1257" Pharmaceutics 13, no. 12: 2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13122059

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop