Next Article in Journal
It’s the Social Interaction That Matters: Exploring Residents’ Motivation to Invest in the Community-Shared Charging Post Co-Construction Project
Previous Article in Journal
Proportional-Switch Adjustment Process-Based Day-by-Day Evolution Model for Mixed Traffic Flow in an Autonomous Driving Environment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Electric Vehicles in Last-Mile Delivery: A Bibliometric Review

Department of Transport and Supply Chain Management, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
World Electr. Veh. J. 2025, 16(1), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16010052
Submission received: 16 December 2024 / Revised: 14 January 2025 / Accepted: 18 January 2025 / Published: 20 January 2025

Abstract

:
The rapid growth in e-commerce calls for research on the potential of electric vehicles in improving last-mile delivery. Whereas existing studies have examined aspects of last-mile delivery, such as challenges, acceptance/benefits, and feasibility, the studies are fragmented, with conflicting findings and regional differences. Thus, there is a need for a comprehensive understanding of the studies to map out current research trends and propose future research agendas. To address this research gap, a bibliometric review was conducted on 375 publications from the Scopus database. Findings reveal that pioneering countries such as the USA have researched integrating electric vehicles into last-mile delivery systems, focusing on technological advancements such as battery technologies and smart grids. The sustainability theme is common in most studies, focusing on controlling carbon emissions and energy efficiency. The electric micro-mobility theme has grown in recent years, while emerging technologies remain underexplored, especially in developing economies. Future research should address the underexplored areas. These include charging infrastructure optimisation, electric micro-mobility innovations, and integration in urban environments, alongside the social and ethical implications of electric vehicle adoption for last-mile delivery.

1. Introduction

Electronic commerce (e-commerce) allows people to order goods online without leaving home [1]. Globally, sales from e-commerce are projected to reach $8.034 trillion in 2027 from $5.784 trillion in 2023 [2], a 38.9% growth within four years. The rapid growth in global e-commerce sales is expected to continue, increasing the demand for last-mile delivery. Last-mile delivery (LMD) refers to the last transport of a consignment in a supply chain from the dispatch point to the delivery point where the consignee receives it [3,4,5]. The vehicles used in last-mile delivery can run on different power sources (i.e., either fossil, hybrid, or fossil-free) [6]. Unfortunately, the last-mile process is often the most polluting, inefficient, and expensive part of the supply chain [3], due to its reliance on fossil-powered vehicles. The rising demand for last-mile delivery has led to a significant number of fossil-fueled vehicles on the road, contributing to environmental issues such as traffic congestion [3,5,7,8,9,10], greenhouse gas emissions [3,9,10], noise and air pollution [3,9,10,11], and habitat loss [9,10]. Using fossil-fueled vehicles also leads to high delivery costs [5,7,8], arising from traffic congestion, fuel consumption, and high vehicle maintenance expenses. The growing volume of goods in last-mile delivery and tight delivery deadlines [3,8], necessitate faster delivery options. These last-mile delivery challenges have provided motivation to look for alternatives to fossil-powered vehicles, making electric vehicles (EVs) increasingly popular in recent years due to their attractive features [11].
An electric vehicle is any vehicle that uses electric or traction motors for its propulsion [12,13]. These include battery electric vehicles (BEVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), and extended-range electric vehicles (EREVs) [14,15,16]. BEVs run solely on electricity stored in rechargeable batteries, powered by an electric motor, and have no internal combustion engine [14,16]. PHEVs combine a conventional internal combustion engine with an electric motor and a rechargeable battery [14,16]. HEVs use a conventional combustion engine and an electric motor to power the vehicle. The electric motor provides additional power when needed, e.g., during acceleration, and the internal combustion engine provides range and power for longer trips [14,16]. FCEVs run on electricity generated by a fuel cell (i.e., using hydrogen as a fuel) to power an electric motor. They have a more extended driving range after recharging than BEVs [14,16]. EREVs operate primarily on electricity stored in a battery, with an internal combustion engine kicking in when the battery is depleted to extend the driving range [14,16]. Thus, a variety of electric vehicles can be used in last-mile delivery.
Sustainability concerns, such as greenhouse gas reduction, energy security and independence, resource conservation, air pollution reduction, and socioeconomic impacts, are key drivers of the adoption of electric vehicles [17,18]. The potential economic impacts of electric vehicles include creating new manufacturing, maintenance, and charging infrastructure jobs. The potential social impacts of electric vehicles include improved air quality and reduced noise pollution [16,18], contributing to better health outcomes and a higher quality of life [18]. Electric vehicles can also offer comfort and efficiency in operations not provided by gasoline vehicles [12]. Environmental impacts of electric vehicles relate to reduced greenhouse gas emissions and improved energy efficiency [15,16]. Green vehicles (including electric vehicles) may contribute to the alleviation of problems such as environmental pollution, global warming, and oil dependency [19]. Due to being a clean and environmentally friendly mobility option, electric vehicles represent a promising alternative to conventional internal combustion engine vehicles [16,20].
Whilst electric vehicles offer numerous benefits, the uptake is hindered by various limitations. Among the limitations is the scarcity of critical materials used in electric vehicle batteries and electronic equipment [21]. In addition, the disposal of electric vehicle batteries raises significant environmental concerns due to toxic materials [22]. Economic factors also contribute to the slow uptake of EVs. These factors include high purchase prices [15,17,20,23,24,25,26], high total cost of ownership [17,23,25], concerns over battery replacement and maintenance costs [20,23], and low resale value of EVs [17]. In addition, the enormous investments required to set up charging infrastructure [15], additional costs associated with training drivers [23], and shifts in employment and business operations [15] also limit the uptake of EVs. Many regions suffer from inadequate charging infrastructure [20,23,24,26] and poor /unreliable grid systems [20,24,25], particularly in developing economies, which significantly hinder the uptake of EVs. There are also notable variations in infrastructure standards across different regions [15]. The authors emphasise the need for greater clarity concerning legal matters, inconsistent regulations, and liabilities associated with electric vehicles. In France and the United Kingdom (UK), anxieties about limited driving range, risk of queueing at charging stations, and payload restrictions contribute to reluctance to accept electric vehicles [25]. Due to their battery capacities, EVs have a limited driving range, requiring visits to recharging stations while serving customers along their routes [13,27]. This can lead to increased operational costs and delays in last-mile delivery. In addition, the insufficient technological development of batteries poses a key barrier to transitioning to electric vehicles for last-mile delivery [26].
The preceding discussion shows a growing body of research on electric vehicles. Existing studies have addressed particular aspects of last-mile delivery, such as challenges [23,25], acceptance/benefits [28,29], and feasibility [30]. However, there are conflicting findings and regional disparities. Thus, there is a need for a comprehensive study, as the research is currently fragmented. In addition, as e-commerce grows and electric vehicle technology advances, a bibliometric review can reveal emerging trends supporting last-mile delivery as well as identification of areas that require future research. A search in the Scopus database using keywords (article title (“electric vehicle*”) AND (“last mile” OR “last-mile”) AND (“bibliometric”) did not find any studies directly matching the focus of this review. Thus, there is a need to investigate the current state of research and propose a future research agenda for electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. This is meant to guide policy formulation and promote widespread adoption of electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. The specific research questions are:
  • What are the current trending themes in the study of electric vehicles in last-mile delivery?
  • What are the research gaps and proposed future research areas on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery?
The remainder of the paper is organised as follows: Section 2 describes the materials and methods, Section 3 presents the results, Section 4 discusses findings, and Section 5 presents conclusions.

2. Materials and Methods

This review followed a bibliometric analysis to answer the research questions. A bibliometric review uses quantitative techniques to examine a large body of scholarly publications [31]. It aims to identify patterns, trends, and relationships within a specific field of study by analysing bibliographic data [21,31]. This approach was adopted to identify the topics of electric vehicles that received the most attention. This will offer insightful information to policymakers and researchers to guide future technological development in electric vehicles, implementation, and research to address last-mile delivery challenges.
The main categories of bibliometric analysis are performance analysis, which accounts for the contributions of different research constituents, and science mapping, which focuses on relationships between research constituents [31]. Performance analysis techniques include the productivity of different research constituents such as authors, institutions, countries, and journals in a field. In contrast, science mapping techniques include citation, co-citation, co-word, and co-authorship analyses [31]. Thus, this review first presents performance analysis descriptives, followed by science mapping findings to visualise the relationships in the topic.
The required data was searched to conduct the bibliometric analysis, and appropriate data analysis techniques were applied to achieve the aims of the review. The search strategy involved the selection of appropriate keywords, databases, and inclusion criteria. A search was conducted on the Scopus database on 14 October 2024 using a combination of the following keywords: (Article title, Abstract, Keywords (“electric vehicle *” OR “electric car *” OR “electric bike *” OR “electric scooter *” OR “electric rickshaw *” OR “electric automobile *” OR “electric truck *” OR “electric mobility” OR “electric micromobility” OR “EV” OR “BEV” OR “HEV” OR “PHEV” OR “FCEV” OR “EREV” OR “e-vehicle *” OR “e-car *” OR “e-bike *” OR “e-scooter *” OR “e-rickshaw *” OR “e-automobile *” OR “e-truck *” OR “e-mobility” OR “e-micromobility” OR ((“battery” OR “plug-in battery” OR “hybrid” OR “fuel cell” OR “extended range”) AND “electric vehicle *”))) AND (“last mile” OR “last-mile”) AND (“delivery” OR “logistics” OR “distribution” OR “transport *”). The search was limited to journal articles, conference papers, review papers, and book chapters published in the English language between 2010 and 2024. The search provided a total of 434 publications. The Scopus database was used because it is considered among the largest databases of peer-reviewed scientific literature [32]. Even though Scopus and the Web of Science databases index similar journals, Scopus indexed 66.07% more unique journals than the Web of Science [33]. The 434 publications were manually inspected, and those that were not relevant to the topic, without titles or abstracts, were deleted. This reduced the number to 375 publications, which were then exported as a CSV Excel file for further analysis. The Bibliometrix package version 4.3.0 (specifically the Biblioshiny app version 4.3.0) was used for performance analysis and science mapping. Performance analysis (quantitative measures representing authors, journals, and countries) was used to identify the scholars, sources, and countries that have contributed the most, as well as identify the dominant themes and trends used in the study of the topic. Science mapping (citation analysis, co-citation analysis, co-word analysis, and thematic mapping) helped to identify the dominant themes and trends used in the study of the topic. Table 1 provides the main information about the data. Even though the search was limited to publications between 2010 and 2024, it was noted that the first publication was in 2013, indicating that this is a young field. The average citations per publication is high (17.3), highlighting the research’s significant impact and relevance.

3. Results

This section provides a comprehensive description of the results obtained and their interpretation.

3.1. Performance Analysis

Between 2013 and 2015, there was little research on the topic, with no more than ten publications per year (Figure 1). This may be attributed to a few government incentives and policies (e.g., subsidies on electric vehicles), the slow growth in e-commerce, and most e-commerce companies relying on conventional delivery vehicles. There were incentive policies for revitalising the automobile industries between 2009 and 2011 [14]. From 2016, there was a double-digit publication growth, rising from 11 to 15 publications in 2019 (Figure 1). During this period, there were rising environmental concerns and regulatory pressures for green logistics. The adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the United Nations in 2015 is partly responsible for interest in electric vehicles during this period [17]. From 2020, there was a significant increase in publications, rising from 31 to a high of 80 publications in 2023 (Figure 1). However, a slight decline in publications in 2022 could be attributed to the impact of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disruptions on research outputs. In recent years, the growing interest in electric vehicles in last-mile delivery can be attributed to technological advancements, increasing environmental concerns, and energy security [16]. Many governments have implemented policies to promote environmentally friendly and innovative transport technology to mitigate the climate change threat brought on by transport sector emissions and minimise dependence on other countries for oil [16]. Thus, the sharp increase in recent years can be attributed to conducive government incentives and policies, increasing environmental regulations (e.g., the Paris Agreement), technological advancements, and the rapid growth of e-commerce.

3.1.1. Most Productive Journals

The top-ranked journal is Transport Research Part D: Transport and Environment, with 914 citations, an h-index of 13, and a g-index of 17 calculated from 2017 (Table 2), thus the most influential journal. The Sustainability journal is ranked second with 380 citations, an h-index of 9, and a g-index of 17, calculated from 2015 (Table 2). The two journals cover a broad range of topics. In contrast, the World Electric Vehicle Journal and the Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies cover specialised research topics. The Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies journal has five publications with 469 citations (Table 2), implying highly impactful studies. The journal focuses on specialised topics such as machine learning and artificial intelligence in electric vehicles. The European Journal of Operational Research is relatively new, starting its publication in 2022 with an m-index of 1.667 (Table 2), implying a few highly impactful studies. The studies focus on optimisation and modeling problems in last-mile delivery (route optimisation, and energy consumption modeling). The Energies journal and the Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice started publishing in 2020, each with a high m-index of 1.6 (Table 2), implying few high-impact studies despite being new.
SCImago ranks all the listed journals in different subject categories. Journals such as Sustainability, Energies, Journal of Transport Geography, Environmental Science and Technology, Sustainable Cities and Society, and the 2020 Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation Systems cover sustainability subjects. The Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, the Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Artificial Intelligence and Bioinformatics), the IEEE Access journal, and the 2021 International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems focus on technological innovations. The World Electric Vehicle Journal and the 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition focus on electric vehicles, while the European Journal of Operational Research focuses on operational research. The Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, and the Case Studies on Transport Policy focus on policy and regulation. The journals focusing on operations and transportation cover issues such as routing problems, operational costs, and range anxiety resulting from electric vehicles. The journals focusing on sustainability cover issues such as carbon emission control and improved energy efficiency. The journals focusing on technological innovations cover technological advancements in electric vehicles, such as routing algorithms and battery technologies. Thus, the multidisciplinary approach is essential in considering all perspectives from different subject categories to understand electric vehicles fully. Combining insights from transportation, operational research, sustainability, and technological innovations can lead to more comprehensive and innovative electric vehicle solutions for last-mile delivery. For instance, integrating operational research findings on route optimisation with battery technology from technological innovation journals would extend electric vehicle range and reduce delivery times.

3.1.2. Most Productive Authors

Table 1 shows 1145 authors have contributed to research on the topic, with 18 (1.6%) being single authors. This suggests a collaborative research approach to the topic. The top three researchers (i.e., Andaloro L., Antonucci V., and Napoli G.) have the highest impact and productivity on the topic, each with five publications, 72 citations, an h-index of 4, and a g-index of 5 calculated from 2014 (Table 3). They have co-authored five publications focusing on infrastructure for smart cities (e.g., charging stations) and electric vehicle technological innovations (e.g., energy storage and battery technology). These are published in high-impact journals, likely to influence subsequent research on energy storage and charging technologies. Emerging researchers (such as Hosseinzadeh A. and Kluger R.) have a high m-index of 0.75 and 202 citations from the three publications calculated from 2021 (Table 3). They have co-authored three studies focusing on the factors influencing the use of electric micro-mobility (the use of small, low-speed, electric-powered vehicles such as electric bikes and electric scooters) in last-mile delivery. The most recent researcher is Kepaptsoglou K, who has a high m-index of 1.5 from the four publications calculated from 2023 (Table 3). The author focuses on using electric micro-mobility (e.g., e-bikes and e-scooters) in last-mile delivery. These studies are crucial for addressing barriers of electric micro-mobility in last-mile delivery. Veteran researchers (such as Lebeau P., Macharis C., and Van Mierlo J.) each have 113 citations from the three publications, having started their publication in 2013 (Table 3), suggesting a sustained contribution and possibly more foundational work on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. They have co-authored three publications focusing on how electric vehicles affect delivery efficiency, environmental benefits, and operational performance compared to conventional vehicles.

3.1.3. Author Affiliations

Author affiliations indicate the institutions where the authors are working. As shown in Table 4, the USA has five institutions, while China has one. Italy and Germany lead in Europe with three institutions each. Thus, geographic diversity in research on the topic is evident, with the top 20 institutions across the USA, Europe, and Asia. However, Africa is not represented.

3.1.4. Most Productive Countries

The top five countries based on the frequencies of scientific production (i.e., by corresponding authors) are the United States of America (USA) (227), Germany (157), Italy (135), India (123), and China (103) (Table 5). The high ranking of the USA can be attributed to government policy pushing for electric vehicle adoption, which is expected to ensure that half of new passengers and trucks sold in the country have zero emissions by 2030 [34]. In China and the USA, the rapid expansion of e-commerce companies such as Jingdong (JD.com, Inc), Alibaba, and Amazon is at the forefront of experimenting with new delivery vehicles such as electric vehicles. The high rankings of the USA and China relate to pioneering research on integrating electric vehicles into last-mile delivery systems, focusing on technological advancements such as autonomous driving, battery technologies, and smart grid integration. Germany’s and Italy’s high rankings result from their automotive companies’ contributions to the development of innovative electric vehicle technologies. Emerging markets such as India’s ranking can be attributed to research aimed at overcoming local challenges and promoting electric vehicle adoption (mostly e-scooters). Brazil, an emerging economy, is ranked 16th (Table 5), with research focusing on electric vehicle technology adaptation and infrastructure development to address urban mobility and environmental challenges. No African country was among the top 20 most productive countries (Table 5), underscoring a significant regional disparity in scientific research. Thus, the leading countries have contributed substantially to research on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. This includes policy analysis, battery technology, and charging infrastructure. The emerging countries are addressing local challenges and opportunities related to electric vehicle adoption.

3.2. Science Mapping

3.2.1. Co-Authorship Analysis

The country collaboration map visually represents the intensity (indicated by colours) and direction (shown by lines) of collaboration between countries in a specific field. The thickness of the lines indicates the frequency/rate of collaboration among different countries. For example, the USA has the highest collaboration rate, mainly with Canada, China, India, and European countries (Figure 2). The USA’s collaborations (specifically with India) focus on integrating electric vehicles (e.g., e-scooters) by evaluating challenges and barriers to their adoption. In Europe, the United Kingdom has the highest rate of collaboration with Sweden (Figure 2), showing intracontinental collaborations. In Asia, China has the highest collaboration rate, mainly with Australia and Korea (Figure 2). China’s collaborations with Australia focus on two-wheeled transport (e.g., e-bikes), green vehicle routing, and efficient e-scooter charging solutions. Africa has a low rate of collaboration (Figure 2). While Tunisia collaborates with Luxembourg, Morocco collaborates with France. Studies in Nigeria explored challenges to adopting electric vehicles (e.g., scarce infrastructure, affordability issues, and unequal access to energy) and opportunities for renewable energy utilisation. Tunisia’s collaboration with Luxembourg explored the potential for modular electric vehicles to improve last-mile delivery efficiency (e.g., by addressing challenges of limited battery capacity and optimising vehicle routing). The dark blue colour on the map (e.g., USA, China, India, Germany, and Italy) represents high-intensity collaborations, while the light blue colour (e.g., Canada, Australia, Brazil, and Nigeria) signifies medium-intensity collaborations. The grey colour (most countries in Africa and Russia) denotes low-intensity collaborations. Thus, the USA, China, India, and a few European countries dominate the research collaborations on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery.

3.2.2. Co-Citation Analysis

Authors are split into several clusters, defined by the similarity of the research areas in which the author works [15]. Similarity in a research topic is measured by the frequency with which two publications are cited together [16]. Figure 3 shows three major themes: The main cluster (orange) led by Schneider M. (2014) forms the core of the network and is likely to be a foundational study in the topic. Schneider M. (2014) explores the theme of electric vehicle performance (i.e., the electric vehicle routing problem due to the limited battery capacities and vehicle freight capacities). The second cluster (red) includes Smith C.S. (2018) and Gossling S. (2020), exploring policy implications for the adoption of electric vehicles, e.g., infrastructure and dedicated parking. The third cluster (blue), led by Hardt C. (2019) and Gruber J. (2014), relates to the use of electric micro-mobility, e.g., e-scooters and e-bikes in last-mile delivery. The connection between the red and blue clusters implies a need to make policy-driven decisions when using electric micro-mobility. The purple cluster, led by McKenzie G. (2019) and Hollingsworth J. (2019), focuses on shared electric micro-mobility in urban areas, emphasising usage behaviours, environmental considerations, and related policy implications. The green cluster, led by Arnold F. (2018) and Melo S. (2017), and the brown cluster, led by Laa B. (2020), are isolated clusters focusing on unique aspects or methodologies, such as spatial analysis or regional case studies. Overall, all the clusters appear detached from each other, an indicator of the early phases of research on the topic. A more mature research topic looks at influences between topics, resulting in interconnected clusters.

3.2.3. Co-Word Analysis

The analysis identified 2, 149 keywords plus on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery publications (Table 1). The high number of keywords highlights the topic’s diverse range of research. In addition, Table 6 lists the top 50 most frequently used keywords. From the top 50 keywords, the four main themes include sustainability, technological innovations, operational efficiency, and electric micro-mobility. The operational efficiency of electric vehicles includes keywords such as fleet operations, vehicle routing, optimisation, costs, travel time, and transport planning (Table 6). The performance of electric vehicles has a positive effect on the intention to buy the vehicles [16]. The theme of technological innovations includes keywords such as secondary batteries, charging (batteries), integer programming, learning systems, routing algorithms, drones, autonomous vehicles, and automation (Table 6). Optimising routes using advanced routing algorithms and advances in battery technology is crucial for the widespread adoption of electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. Many researchers have recently focused on developing advanced battery systems due to the high demand for alternative secondary batteries [14]. The sustainability theme includes keywords such as energy utilisation, sustainable development, greenhouse gases, sustainability, energy efficiency, traffic congestion, carbon dioxide, emission control, environmental impact, energy management, and life cycle (Table 6). The uptake of electric vehicles in last-mile delivery is often motivated by the aim to achieve Sustainable Development Goals by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, especially carbon dioxide, in urban areas. The theme of electric micro-mobility includes keywords such as micro-mobility, cycle transport, electric scooters (e-scooters), and electric bikes (Table 6). The electric micro-mobility alternatives are becoming common in last-mile delivery over short distances in urban areas. Thus, co-word analysis shows that embracing electric vehicles for last-mile delivery can help in operational efficiency and sustainable transportation in last-mile delivery.
A word trend analysis was used to understand word growth over time. In the early stages (2013 to 2015), the words electric vehicle(s) and urban transportation were common (Figure 4), although the frequencies were relatively low. The words last-mile and fleet operations were used from 2014 (Figure 4), although they did not report significant frequencies. During this period, interest in electric vehicles for last-mile delivery was limited. Most e-commerce businesses relied on conventional delivery vehicles. The moderate growth period between 2016 and 2019 saw a moderate increase in the frequencies of the words electric vehicle(s), urban transportation, and last-mile (Figure 4). The emphasis from 2013 to 2020 was on integrating electric vehicles into logistics. The significant growth period between 2020 and 2023 saw the highest frequencies of the words electric vehicle(s) and last-mile (Figure 4). Energy utilisation, vehicle routing, fleet operations, urban transportation, public transport, and bicycles also reported a significant rise in frequencies (Figure 4). From 2020 onwards, the emphasis was on the sustainability theme, particularly energy utilisation and bicycles. In addition, the growth in words over time moved from broad (e.g., electric vehicles, last-mile, and urban transport) to specific (energy utilisation, vehicle routing, and fleet operations).

3.2.4. Thematic Mapping

Thematic mapping of published documents helps to discover themes in a field, categorising them as motor, basic, emerging or declining, and niche themes [35]. These themes can be visualised using a two-dimensional diagram divided into four quadrants with the horizontal axis as density/development degree and the vertical axis as centrality/relevance degree [36,37]. High centrality indicates that the scientific community considers a research theme as crucial, while density signifies a theme’s ability to maintain itself and develop over time in a field [36]. Figure 5 shows motor themes (quadrant one), which are central and developed; basic themes (quadrant two), which are central but undeveloped; emerging or declining themes (quadrant three), which are peripheral and undeveloped; and niche themes (quadrant four), which are peripheral but developed [36,37].
The motor theme (quadrant one) relates to electromobility (Figure 5), forming the foundation of discussions around electric vehicles. The keywords represented in this theme include electric vehicles and urban transportation. The finding might imply that electric vehicles are crucial in addressing urban transportation challenges. The basic theme (quadrant two) relates to electric micro-mobility (Figure 5), which is considered fundamental but has yet to mature. The keywords in the theme are bicycles, micromobility, cycle transport, urban transport, and public transport. Since the theme is relevant but underexplored, more research is required to fully exploit the potential of electric micro-mobility in urban areas for last-mile delivery. The niche theme (quadrant four) relates to environmental sustainability (Figure 5) and is considered mature, i.e., well-established and still relevant. The keywords in the niche theme include greenhouse gases, emission control, and lifecycle. Emission control refers to decreasing greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide, contributing to climate change [17]. Todorovic et al. [15] noted that the main reasons for introducing electric vehicles are environmental factors, i.e., greenhouse gas emission reduction and targeting net zero emissions. The high uptake of electric vehicles can potentially reduce environmental carbon footprint [16]. As such, electric vehicles offer an opportunity to control emissions and reduce carbon footprint. At the intersection of quadrant three (the emerging or declining theme) and quadrant two (the basic theme) are two themes: technological innovations (keywords such as secondary batteries and integer programming) and operational efficiency (keywords such as fleet operations, vehicle routing, and energy utilisation). As basic themes, there is potential for technological innovations to improve the operational efficiency of electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. As emerging themes, the specific application of technological innovations such as integer programming and charging (batteries) might still be in the early stages. Limited driving range, reduced payload, uncertain battery lifespan, and long recharge waiting times are among the challenges of electric vehicle adoption in final parcel delivery [23].

3.2.5. Citation Analysis

Citation analysis will help to identify the seminal publications on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. Table 7 presents the ten most cited publications on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. The most cited publication, 74.58 citations per year, was by Schneider et al. [38], which focuses on electric vehicle-routing problems with time windows and recharging stations (i.e., an operational aspect of electric vehicles). The high citations per year imply that this is a groundbreaking work on the topic, addressing the operational challenge of integrating electric vehicles in last-mile delivery.
Publications in Table 7 show that the two dominant themes are electric micro-mobility and sustainability. Several publications in the list focus on the environmental benefits of electric vehicles and alternative delivery vehicles [42,47]. These studies emphasise the potential of electric vehicles to reduce energy consumption, air pollution, and carbon emissions in last-mile delivery. There is significant research in electric micro-mobility [39,40,41,44,45,46,47] and autonomous vehicles [42] in last-mile delivery. The study by Campell et al. [39], which has the second highest number of citations per year (35.30 citations), highlights the growing interest in electric micro-mobility in congested cities such as Beijing. Research on electric micro-mobility addresses topics such as their potential in last-mile delivery, safety concerns, and user behaviour. While Yang et al. [41] highlighted the need for e-scooter safety measures, such as the use of helmets, Saunders et al. [40] discussed barriers to using e-scooters, such as traffic safety concerns and equipment unavailability. Dias et al. [47] found that shared e-scooter systems can reduce air pollution, improve transport equity, and enhance urban mobility resilience. Autonomous vehicles, such as drones, hold the potential to further reduce carbon emissions and energy consumption compared to electric vehicles [42]. However, there is a lack of research on how to integrate emerging technologies (e.g., artificial intelligence, data analytics, and the internet-of-things) into electric vehicle research for last-mile delivery. Several studies focus on users’ acceptance of electric vehicles [39,40,44,45,46]. Distance, safety, price/cost, environmental conditions, demographic factors (age and gender), and perceived usefulness influence user acceptance of electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. The publications show a recurring theme of infrastructure and charging networks to support the adoption of electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. Schneider et al. [38] emphasise that the effective use of electric vehicles in last-mile delivery requires careful route planning due to limited recharging stations. Hosseinzadeh et al. [43] highlight the importance of integrating electric mobility into urban planning and land use by examining spatial factors (such as commercial and industrial land use). From the preceding discussion, the covered topics tend to be broad (e.g., drone-based and ground-based parcel delivery services) or narrow (e.g., shared e-bikes and e-scooters). In addition, the geographic diversity of covered studies is noted in various countries such as Beijing [39], the USA [40,41,43,46], South Korea [45], Portugal [47], and Poland [44]. This underscores the need for context-specific electric vehicle solutions in last-mile delivery.

4. Discussion

The rapid growth in e-commerce calls for urgent research on the potential of electric vehicles in transforming last-mile delivery. Although some studies have addressed particular aspects of last-mile delivery, such as challenges [23,25], acceptance [28,29], and feasibility [30], there is a need for a comprehensive study as the research is currently scattered. Performance analysis reveals that leading authors such as Andaloro L., Antonucci V., and Napoli G. have extensively researched electric vehicle technological innovations (such as energy storage and battery technology) and infrastructure for smart cities (e.g., charging stations). In contrast, emerging authors such as Hosseinzadeh A. and Kluger R. have researched factors influencing the use of electric micro-mobility (e.g., electric bikes and electric scooters) in last-mile delivery. The USA, Germany, Italy, India, and China are top-ranked scientific producers in the topic. This is reinforced by the country collaboration map, which shows considerable international input into research on the topic, especially from the USA and China. The USA and China have conducted pioneering research on integrating electric vehicles into last-mile delivery systems, focusing on technological advancements such as autonomous driving, battery technologies, and smart grid integration. Among leading countries in electric vehicle research, the USA has contributed significantly to charging infrastructure, battery technology, environmental issues, and policy analysis [16,17]. In contrast, little research from African countries highlights regional disparity in research contributions. The country collaboration analysis identified that Tunisia collaborates with global researchers, exploring the potential for modular electric vehicles to improve last-mile delivery efficiency (e.g., by addressing challenges of limited battery capacity and optimising vehicle routing). The potential of modular vehicles might be overstated in African countries without considering other factors, such as economic feasibility and infrastructural limitations. Nigeria’s collaborations explored challenges to adopting electric vehicles (e.g., scarce infrastructure, affordability issues, and unequal access to energy) and opportunities for renewable energy utilisation. The collaborative approach emphasizes the importance of teamwork and shared expertise across disciplines in advancing research. Ullah et al. [16] noted that collaborations can assist researchers in developing joint ventures and exchanging innovative technologies and ideas. Analysis of the top-ranked journals revealed that there is a broad range of journals, such as the Sustainability Journal and the Transport and Research Part D: Transport and Environment. The broad journals emphasise sustainability (e.g., environmental), technological innovations (e.g., electric vehicles), and operational (e.g., transportation) aspects. The specialised journals such as the Transport Research Part C: Emerging Technologies and the World Electric Vehicle Journal explore areas such as machine learning and artificial intelligence in electric vehicles. The newer journals, such as the European Journal of Operational Research and Transportation Research Part A, explore areas such as optimisation and policy solutions.
The critical themes used to study electric vehicles in last-mile delivery were identified. Thematic mapping reveals that sustainability is critical in using electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. Oe and Abdullah [48] agree that sustainability is a central theme in business initiatives and developing new ideas, innovations, and products (e.g., electric vehicles). Analysis of the top-cited publications reinforces that electric vehicles are associated with environmental benefits such as reduced carbon emissions, air pollution, and energy consumption in last-mile delivery [42,47]. Electric micro-mobility is a common theme in the research on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. The role of micro-mobility might expand, especially in densely populated areas where the other types of electric vehicles are less efficient. For instance, analysis of the most cited publications highlights the growing interest in electric micro-mobility in congested cities such as Beijing [39]. The studies on electric micro-mobility focus on the potential to further reduce carbon emissions and energy consumption compared to electric vehicles. The co-word analysis reinforces the electric micro-mobility theme using keywords such as micro-mobility, cycle transport, electric scooters (e-scooters), and electric bikes. The electric micro-mobility alternatives are becoming common in last-mile delivery over short distances in urban areas to address the growing sustainability concerns in last-mile delivery. However, analysis of the most cited publications revealed a need for more research on integrating emerging technologies (e.g., data analytics, artificial intelligence, and the internet-of-things) in the use of electric vehicles for last-mile delivery. For instance, artificial intelligence can be used to optimise delivery routes through the use of real-time data on weather, traffic, and charging station availability, resulting in efficiency in last-mile delivery. The co-citation analysis revealed a foundational study on electric vehicle performance (i.e., the electric vehicle routing problem due to the limited battery capacities and vehicle freight capacities [38]. In addition, Smith C.S. (2018) and Gossling S. (2020) explored policy implications for adopting electric vehicles, e.g., infrastructure and dedicated parking.
Thematic mapping identified two central themes: electric micro-mobility and technological innovations. These are considered fundamental but yet-to-mature themes. Electric micro mobility can reduce operational costs in last-mile delivery compared to other electric vehicles. However, widespread adoption may be hindered by infrastructure limitations, limited battery life, and safety concerns for riders. Secondary batteries are one technological advancement that can significantly increase the operational efficiency of electric micromobility. Further analysis of the most cited publications revealed that distance, safety, price/cost, environmental conditions, and perceived usefulness influence user acceptance of electric vehicles in last-mile delivery [39,44]. Therefore, it is necessary to intensify research efforts to overcome the economic, operational, technological, and infrastructural challenges to increase the uptake of electric vehicles in last-mile delivery.

5. Conclusions

Notably, there is an increasing trend in research on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery, a positive sign for the future of e-commerce. This could be attributed to the electric vehicles’ economic, environmental, and operational advantages. Research on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery revolves around four themes, namely sustainability, electric micro-mobility, electric vehicle performance/operational efficiency, and charging infrastructure/technological innovations. The future research agenda will focus on addressing several research gaps relevant to these four themes.
  • Developing economies, particularly in Africa, face unique last-mile delivery challenges, yet little research originates from these countries. Future research in developing economies should focus on electric vehicle charging infrastructure and operational feasibility to support last-mile delivery. This includes assessing energy grid capacity and charging infrastructure optimisation. In addition, future research on charging infrastructure should focus on systemic challenges faced by developing countries. These challenges include external shocks such as power blackouts, inadequate transport policies, lack of government support, and logistical inefficiencies. Investigating how these external shocks affect electric vehicle operations can help develop resilient charging infrastructure tailored to local conditions.
  • Although sustainability dominates research on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery, more focus is on environmental issues, giving little attention to social and economic issues. Patella et al. [19] assert that sustainability includes environmental, economic, and social considerations in evaluating logistics configurations. The future research agenda will need to focus on integrating social issues into research on electric vehicles for last-mile delivery. These may include safety, standards/regulations, and ethical and privacy concerns arising from using electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. The future research agenda will also need to focus on integrating economic issues into research on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. These include analysing funding models for charging infrastructure, consumers’ willingness to pay for electric vehicle delivery options, potential for job creation, and the role of economic policies in promoting the uptake of electric vehicles in last-mile delivery.
  • While interest in electric micro-mobility is growing, particularly in congested cities, the focus remains on acceptance/adoption. Electric micro-mobility (e.g., e-bikes and e-scooters) could support the penetration and acceptability of electric vehicles because they are considered a sustainable mobility option for city logistics [49]. Thus, future research should focus on underexplored areas such as micro-mobility charging infrastructure integration in urban environments, advancements in micro-mobility battery technologies, regulatory barriers, and safety concerns.
  • While technological advancements dominate research on electric vehicle performance in last-mile delivery, little attention is given to emerging technologies (such as artificial intelligence, data analytics, and the internet of things). Future research should focus on how the use of electric vehicles can benefit from integrating these emerging technologies to improve last-mile delivery. In addition, ethical issues such as perceived safety, data security, and privacy will be on the rise, and future research should explore these issues arising from using emerging technologies.
The current review is limited to findings from publications extracted from the Scopus database. Other databases, such as Web of Science and Science Direct, exist and should be considered for future research to include any publications that might have been missed. This review also focused on specific keywords for a meaningful analysis. Despite being relevant, future researchers can expand the search criteria to undertake a more comprehensive search as more innovations emerge in the electric vehicle industry. In agreement, Mogire et al. [50] concluded that electric vehicles are expected to continue evolving to support last-mile delivery. Overall, this bibliometric review extends knowledge of the current state of research. It has provided a comprehensive understanding of the dominant themes used in current research on electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. Thus, sustainability and technological advancements are the main drivers for the increased use of electric vehicles in last-mile delivery. Managers should concentrate on investing in sustainable technological innovations such as electric micro-mobility and other emerging technologies to improve last-mile delivery efficiency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.M., P.K. and R.L.; methodology, E.M., P.K. and R.L.; software, E.M.; validation, P.K. and R.L.; formal analysis, E.M.; investigation, E.M.; data curation, E.M.; writing—original draft preparation, E.M.; writing—review and editing, E.M., P.K. and R.L.; visualization, P.K. and R.L.; supervision, P.K. and R.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lauenstein, S.; Schank, C. Design of a sustainable last mile in urban logistics—A systematic literature review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. eMarketer. Worldwide Ecommerce Forecast 2023. Available online: https://www.emarketer.com/content/worldwide-ecommerce-forecast-2023 (accessed on 20 March 2024).
  3. Ha, N.T.; Akbari, M.; Au, B. Last mile delivery in logistics and supply chain management: A bibliometric analysis and future directions. Benchmarking Int. J. 2023, 30, 1137–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mogire, E.; Kilbourn, P.; Luke, R. Customer satisfaction with last mile delivery in Kenya: An online customer perspective. J. Transp. Supply Chain Manag. 2023, 17, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mogire, E. Last Mile Delivery and Customer Satisfaction Created by Online Retailers in Nairobi. University of Johannesburg. 2022. Available online: https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za/esploro/outputs/doctoral/Last-mile-delivery-and-customer-satisfaction/9921406107691 (accessed on 5 January 2025).
  6. Risberg, A.; Jafari, H. Last mile practices in e-commerce: Framework development and empirical analysis of Swedish firms. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2022, 50, 942–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mogire, E.; Kilbourn, P.; Luke, R. The last mile delivery problem: A Kenyan retail perspective. Acta Logist. 2022, 9, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Boysen, N.; Fedtke, S.; Schwerdfeger, S. Last-mile delivery concepts: A survey from an operational research perspective. OR Spectrum 2021, 43, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. World Economic Forum. The Future of the Last-Mile Ecosystem. 2020. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-the-last-mile-ecosystem/ (accessed on 2 July 2024).
  10. Mucowska, M. Trends of environmentally sustainable solutions of urban last-mile deliveries on the e-commerce market—A literature review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hussan, U.; Majeed, M.A.; Asghar, F.; Waleed, A.; Khan, A.; Javed, M.R. Fuzzy logic-based voltage regulation of hybrid energy storage system in hybrid electric vehicles. Electr. Eng. 2022, 104, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ramirez Barreto, D.A.; Ochoa Guillermo, E.V.; Peña Rodriguez, A.; Cardenas Escorcia, Y.D.C. Bibliometric analysis of nearly a decade of research in electric vehicles: A dynamic approach. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2018, 13, 4730–4736. [Google Scholar]
  13. Keskin, M.; Çatay, B. Partial recharge strategies for the electric vehicle routing problem with time windows. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2016, 65, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Barbosa, W.; Prado, T.; Batista, C.; Câmara, J.C.; Cerqueira, R.; Coelho, R.; Guarieiro, L. Electric vehicles: Bibliometric analysis of the current state of the art and perspectives. Energies 2022, 15, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Todorovic, M.; Aldakkhelallah, A.; Simic, M. Managing transitions to autonomous and electric vehicles: Scientometric and bibliometric review. World Electr. Veh. J. 2023, 14, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ullah, I.; Safdar, M.; Zheng, J.; Severino, A.; Jamal, A. Employing bibliometric analysis to identify the current state of the art and future prospects of electric vehicles. Energies 2023, 16, 2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Singh, V.; Singh, H.; Dhiman, B.; Kumar, N.; Singh, T. Analyzing bibliometric and thematic patterns in the transition to sustainable transportation: Uncovering the influences on electric vehicle adoption. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2023, 50, 101033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singh, G.; Misra, S.C.; Daultani, Y.; Singh, S. Electric vehicle adoption and sustainability: Insights from the bibliometric analysis, cluster analysis, and morphology analysis. Oper. Manag. Res. 2024, 17, 635–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Patella, S.M.; Grazieschi, G.; Gatta, V.; Marcucci, E.; Carrese, S. The adoption of green vehicles in last mile logistics: A systematic review. Sustainability 2020, 13, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Purwanto, E.; Irawan, A.P. Bibliometric analysis of electric vehicle adoption research: Trends, implications, and future directions. Int. J. Saf. Secur. Eng. 2023, 13, 789–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Soares, L.O.; Reis, A.D.C.; Vieira, P.S.; Hernandez-Callejo, L.; Boloy, R.A.M. Electric vehicle supply chain management: A bibliometric and systematic review. Energies 2023, 16, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Amusa, H.K.; Sadiq, M.; Alam, G.; Alam, R.; Siefan, A.; Ibrahim, H.; Raza, A.; Yildiz, B. Electric vehicle batteries waste management and recycling challenges: A comprehensive review of green technologies and future prospects. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2024, 26, 1959–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Anosike, A.; Loomes, H.; Udokporo, C.K.; Garza-Reyes, J.A. Exploring the challenges of electric vehicle adoption in final mile parcel delivery. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2023, 26, 683–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Agyekum, E.B.; Adebayo, T.S.; Ampah, J.D.; Chakraborty, S.; Mehmood, U.; Nutakor, C. Transportation in Africa under Paris Agreement 2 C goal—A review of electric vehicle potentials, cleaner alternative fuels for the sector, challenges, and opportunities. In Environmental Science and Pollution Research; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  25. Morganti, E.; Browne, M. Technical and operational obstacles to the adoption of electric vans in France and the UK: An operator perspective. Transp. Policy 2018, 63, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Corti, F.; Nava, A. Investment in Greening Last-Mile Logistics: A Case Study. In Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions: Results of SSPCR 2022; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; p. 7584. [Google Scholar]
  27. Keskin, M.; Çatay, B. A matheuristic method for the electric vehicle routing problem with time windows and fast chargers. Comput. Oper. Res. 2018, 100, 172–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alnıpak, S.; Toraman, Y. Acceptance of e-vehicles for last-mile parcel delivery from the perspective of drivers: A study in Turkiye. LogForum 2023, 19, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ngoc, A.M.; Nishiuchi, H.; Nhu, N.T. Determinants of carriers’ intentions to use electric cargo vehicles in last-mile delivery by extending the technology acceptance model: A case study of Vietnam. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2022, 34, 210–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, H.; Callegari, C.; Fiorini, A.C.O.; Schaeffer, R.; Szklo, A. Technical and economic modelling of last-mile transport: A case for Brazil. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2024, 16, 101219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mohammad, W.A.; Nazih Diab, Y.; Elomri, A.; Triki, C. Innovative solutions in last mile delivery: Concepts, practices, challenges, and future directions. Supply Chain. Forum Int. J. 2023, 24, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Singh, V.K.; Singh, P.; Karmakar, M.; Leta, J.; Mayr, P. The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics 2021, 126, 5113–5142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Locke, S.L. Household characteristics and electric vehicle adoption: Changes from 2017 to 2022. In Applied Economics Letters; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2024; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  35. Luke, R.; Mageto, J. Impact of China’s belt and road initiative on logistics management in Africa: A bibliometric analysis. J. Int. Logist. Trade 2023, 21, 204–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Callon, M.; Courtial, J.P.; Laville, F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 1991, 22, 155–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mageto, J. Current and future trends of information technology and sustainability in logistics outsourcing. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schneider, M.; Stenger, A.; Goeke, D. The electric vehicle routing problem with time windows and recharging stations. Transp. Sci. 2014, 48, 500–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Campbell, A.A.; Cherry, C.R.; Ryerson, M.S.; Yang, X. Factors influencing the choice of shared bicycles and shared electric bikes in Beijing. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2016, 67, 399–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sanders, R.L.; Branion-Calles, M.; Nelson, T.A. To scoot or not to scoot: Findings from a recent survey about the benefits and barriers of using e-scooters for riders and non-riders. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 139, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, H.; Ma, Q.; Wang, Z.; Cai, Q.; Xie, K.; Yang, D. Safety of micro-mobility: Analysis of e-scooter crashes by mining news reports. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2020, 143, 105608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kirschstein, T. Comparison of energy demands of drone-based and ground-based parcel delivery services. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 78, 102209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hosseinzadeh, A.; Algomaiah, M.; Kluger, R.; Li, Z. E-scooters and sustainability: Investigating the relationship between the density of E-scooter trips and characteristics of sustainable urban development. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 66, 102624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bieliński, T.; Ważna, A. Electric scooter sharing and bike sharing user behaviour and characteristics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Baek, K.; Lee, H.; Chung, J.H.; Kim, J. Electric scooter sharing: How do people value it as a last-mile transportation mode? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2021, 90, 102642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hosseinzadeh, A.; Algomaiah, M.; Kluger, R.; Li, Z. Spatial analysis of shared e-scooter trips. J. Transp. Geogr. 2021, 92, 103016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dias, G.; Arsenio, E.; Ribeiro, P. The role of shared e-scooter systems in urban sustainabil-ity and resilience during the COVID-19 mobility restrictions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Oe, H.; Abdullah, M.N. An exploratory discussion on electric cars and sustainable innovation. Econ. J. Sci. J. Account. Manag. Financ. 2022, 2, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Castiglione, M.; Comi, A.; De Vincentis, R.; Dumitru, A.; Nigro, M. Delivering in urban areas: A probabilistic-behavioral approach for forecasting the use of electric micromobility. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mogire, E.; Kilbourn, P.; Luke, R. Green innovations in last mile delivery for e-commerce: A bibliometric review. In Proceedings of the 17th International Business Conference (IBC), Stellenbosch, South Africa, 22–25 September 2024. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Number of publications on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024). Source: Authors’ own.
Figure 1. Number of publications on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024). Source: Authors’ own.
Wevj 16 00052 g001
Figure 2. Country collaborations map on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024). Source: Authors’ own.
Figure 2. Country collaborations map on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024). Source: Authors’ own.
Wevj 16 00052 g002
Figure 3. Co-citation network on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024). Source: Authors’ own.
Figure 3. Co-citation network on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024). Source: Authors’ own.
Wevj 16 00052 g003
Figure 4. Keywords’ frequency over time on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024). Source: Authors’ own.
Figure 4. Keywords’ frequency over time on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024). Source: Authors’ own.
Wevj 16 00052 g004
Figure 5. Thematic map on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024). Source: Authors’ own.
Figure 5. Thematic map on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024). Source: Authors’ own.
Wevj 16 00052 g005
Table 1. Main information about the publications (2013–2024).
Table 1. Main information about the publications (2013–2024).
DescriptionResults
Timespan2013:2024
Sources (Journals, Books, etc.)205
Documents375
Annual Growth Rate %−5.61
Document Average Age2.73
Average citations per doc17.3
References13,927
DOCUMENT CONTENTS
Keywords Plus (ID)2149
Author’s Keywords (DE)1069
AUTHORS
Authors1145
Authors of single-authored docs18
AUTHORS COLLABORATION
Single-authored docs19
Co-Authors per Doc3.7
International co-authorships %19.73
DOCUMENT TYPES
Article224
book chapter25
conference paper123
Review3
Source: Authors’ own.
Table 2. Top 20 most productive journals on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024).
Table 2. Top 20 most productive journals on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024).
RankJournalh-Indexg-Indexm-IndexTCNPPY_Start
1Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment13171.625914172017
2Sustainability9170.900380172015
3Energies8131.600186132020
4Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice8101.6378102020
5Journal of Transport Geography68116482019
6Transportation Research Procedia680.66715682016
7European Journal of Operational Research551.6678352022
8Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies550.55646952016
9Case Studies on Transport Policy471.0008872017
10Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)450.4442962016
11Sustainable Cities and Society451.00018652021
12World Electric Vehicle Journal460.3335962013
132013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition, EVS 2014330.2732032014
14Applied Sciences330.7502332021
15Environmental Science and Technology330.6006832020
16IEEE Access340.6009342020
17Transportation Research Record370.33363102016
182020 Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation Systems, Fists 2020220.4722020
192021 7th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems, Mt-Its 2021220.51922021
20Computers and Industrial Engineering230.3336632019
Source: Authors’ own.
Table 3. Top 20 most productive authors on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024).
Table 3. Top 20 most productive authors on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024).
RankAuthorh-Indexg-Indexm-IndexTCNPPY_Start
1Andaloro L450.3647252014
2Antonucci V450.3647252014
3Napoli G450.3647252014
4Sergi F440.3644442014
5Bieliński T330.60022232020
6Hosseinzadeh A330.7520232021
7Keoleian G330.7503632021
8Kepaptsoglou K341.5003642023
9Kluger R330.7520232021
10Lebeau P330.25011332013
11Li Z340.7519542021
12Macharis C330.25011332013
13Micari S330.3005132015
14Northrop W330.5004832019
15Simic V330.612232020
16Van Mierlo J330.25011332013
17Vasan A350.3752552017
18Ważna A330.60022232020
19Çatay B340.5006542019
20Agnello G220.2002322015
Source: Authors’ own.
Table 4. Top 20 author affiliations on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024).
Table 4. Top 20 author affiliations on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024).
RankAffiliationFrequency
1National Technical University of Athens27
2Polytechnic University of Bari14
3Universidad Politécnica De Madrid14
4University of Michigan14
5University of Texas at Austin14
6Delft University of Technology13
7Not reported13
8University of Minnesota13
9Tsinghua University12
10Carnegie Mellon University9
11Politecnico Di Milano9
12Rwth Aachen University8
13University of Louisville8
14University of New South Wales8
15University of Palermo8
16University of the Aegean8
17Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences7
18Institute of Transport Research7
19Nanyang Technological University7
20Sabanci University7
Source: Authors’ own.
Table 5. Top 20 countries’ scientific production on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024).
Table 5. Top 20 countries’ scientific production on EVs in LMD research (2013–2024).
RankCountryFrequency
1USA227
2Germany157
3Italy135
4India123
5China103
6Greece65
7Spain54
8South Korea38
9UK35
10Netherlands33
11Poland32
12Turkey28
13Sweden26
14France25
15Australia23
16Brazil22
17Belgium21
18Canada20
19Portugal19
20Japan16
Source: Authors’ own.
Table 6. Top 50 most frequent words on EVs in LMD (2013–2024).
Table 6. Top 50 most frequent words on EVs in LMD (2013–2024).
RankWord (s)OccurrencesRankWord (s)Occurrences
1urban transportation5426public transportation13
2fleet operations4327traffic congestion13
3public transport3728carbon dioxide12
4vehicle routing3729drones12
5energy utilisation3330electric bikes12
6micro-mobility3331urban areas12
7secondary batteries3132carbon footprint11
8sustainable development3133optimisation11
9charging (batteries)2834autonomous vehicles10
10freight transportation2635costs10
11greenhouse gases2636decision-making10
12urban transport2537energy consumption10
13cycle transport2138learning systems10
14travel time2139optimisations10
15energy efficiency1940routing algorithms10
16sustainability1941sales10
17vehicle routing problems1942transportation planning10
18electric scooters1843urban area10
19integer programming1744automation9
20freight transport1645behavioral research9
21travel behavior1646COVID-199
22city logistics1547e-scooter9
23environmental impact1548energy management9
24gas emissions1449greenhouse gas9
25emission control1350life cycle9
Source: Authors’ own.
Table 7. Top 10 most cited publications per year on EVs in LMD (2013–2024).
Table 7. Top 10 most cited publications per year on EVs in LMD (2013–2024).
RankAuthorsTotal Citations Per YearTitleJournalSummary
1.Schneider et al. [38]. 74.58The electric vehicle routing problem with time windows and recharging stationsTransportation ScienceThe paper considered the electric vehicle routing problem with limited time windows, freight capacities, and charging stations. A recharging scheme (i.e., a hybrid heuristic combining variable neighbourhood search and tabu search) was proposed, showing high performance.
2.Campbell et al. [39].35.30Factors influencing the choice of shared bicycles and shared electric bikes in Beijing.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging TechnologiesA survey on factors influencing the choice of shared e-bikes in Beijing found that trip distance, high temperatures, and poor air quality negatively impact bike-share demand. Even though e-bike sharing is attractive as a bus replacement, it is unclear if it is attractive as a last-mile solution.
3. Sanders et al. [40].26.83To scoot or not to scoot: Findings from a recent survey about the benefits and barriers of using e-scooters for riders and non-ridersTransportation Research Part A: Policy and PracticeA survey in the USA found that e-scooters are a convenient travel option during hot weather compared to walking. However, traffic safety concerns and the unavailability of working equipment when needed were noted among the barriers.
4.Yang et al. [41].22.83 Safety of micro-mobility: analysis of e-scooter crashes by mining news reportsAccident Analysis and PreventionThe study examined media reports to identify safety concerns related to the rise of shared e-scooter systems in the USA. A total of 169 incidents were reported between 2017 and 2019, highlighting the need for safety measures such as helmet use and not riding under the influence.
5.Kirschstein [42]. 21.83Comparison of energy demands of drone-based and ground-based parcel delivery servicesTransportation Research Part D: Transport and EnvironmentThe paper presented an energy consumption model for drones, comparing their energy demand to diesel and electric trucks. Results showed that a stationary drone-based parcel delivery system requires more energy than a truck-based parcel delivery system, particularly in urban areas where customer density is high and truck tours are comparatively short.
6.Hosseinzadeh et al. [43].21.20E-scooters and sustainability: Investigating the relationship between the density of e-scooter trips and characteristics of sustainable urban development.Sustainable Cities and SocietyThe study aimed to identify spatial factors associated with scooter trips in the USA. Results showed that commercial and industrial land use, scores of walks, and bikes influenced the trip density of e-scooters.
7.Bieliński & Ważna [44]. 20.50Electric scooter sharing and bike sharing user behaviour and characteristics. SustainabilityThe study investigated user behaviour/characteristics of e-scooters and bike sharing in Poland. Results showed that the public e-bike sharing system was more popular than e-scooter sharing, with residents citing concerns about e-scooter safety, high prices, and lack of perceived usefulness. However, both systems suffer from limited availability and fleet size, affecting user satisfaction.
8.Baek et al. [45].18.40Electric scooter sharing: How do people value it as a last-mile transportation mode?Transportation Research Part D: Transport and EnvironmentThe study investigated preferences for electric scooter sharing (ESS) as last-mile transportation in South Korea. Results showed that ESS is preferred over walking but had similar preferences with town buses.
9.Hosseinzadeh et al. [46].17.20Spatial analysis of shared e-scooter tripsJournal of Transport GeographyThe study investigated the factors influencing e-scooter trips in the USA. Results showed that land use, age, and gender distribution impact acted on the density of e-scooter trips in the traffic analysis zones.
10. Dias et al. [47].15.60The role of shared e-scooter systems in urban sustainability and resilience during the COVID-19 mobility restrictionsSustainabilityThe study conducted a systematic literature review and a case study on the role of shared e-scooter systems in Portugal. Results showed that the shared e-scooter system can help cities with environmental issues, such as reducing air pollution, reducing inequality in access to transport, and improving mobility resilience.
Source: Authors’ own.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mogire, E.; Kilbourn, P.; Luke, R. Electric Vehicles in Last-Mile Delivery: A Bibliometric Review. World Electr. Veh. J. 2025, 16, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16010052

AMA Style

Mogire E, Kilbourn P, Luke R. Electric Vehicles in Last-Mile Delivery: A Bibliometric Review. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2025; 16(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16010052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mogire, Eric, Peter Kilbourn, and Rose Luke. 2025. "Electric Vehicles in Last-Mile Delivery: A Bibliometric Review" World Electric Vehicle Journal 16, no. 1: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16010052

APA Style

Mogire, E., Kilbourn, P., & Luke, R. (2025). Electric Vehicles in Last-Mile Delivery: A Bibliometric Review. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16010052

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop