Next Article in Journal
Effect of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria on Antioxidant Status, Acetolactate Synthase Activity, and Growth of Common Wheat and Canola Exposed to Metsulfuron-Methyl
Next Article in Special Issue
Early Developmental Exposure to Triclosan Impacts Fecal Microbial Populations, IgA and Functional Activities of the Rat Microbiome
Previous Article in Journal
An Initial Survey on Occurrence, Fate, and Environmental Risk Assessment of Organophosphate Flame Retardants in Romanian Waterways
Previous Article in Special Issue
Organochlorine Compounds in the Amur (Heilong) River Basin (2000–2020): A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microbial Removal of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Environments Using Metal-Resistant Indigenous Strains

1
Biotechnology and Bioanalysis Departments, National Institute of Research and Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry—ICECHIM, 202 Spl. Independenței, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 91–95 Spl. Independenței, 050095 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University Titu Maiorescu of Bucharest, 040441 Bucharest, Romania
4
National Institute of Research and Development for Microbiology and Immunology—Cantacuzino, 103 Spl. Independenței, 050096 Bucharest, Romania
5
Field Crop Section, Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Bd Mărăști 61, 011464 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Xenobiot. 2024, 14(1), 51-78; https://doi.org/10.3390/jox14010004
Submission received: 15 November 2023 / Revised: 19 December 2023 / Accepted: 27 December 2023 / Published: 29 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Journal of Xenobiotics: Feature Papers)

Abstract

:
Contamination of soil with heavy metals has become a matter of global importance due to its impact on agriculture, environmental integrity, and therefore human health and safety. Several microbial strains isolated from soil contaminated by long-term chemical and petrochemical activities were found to manifest various levels of tolerance to Cr, Pb, and Zn, out of which Bacillus marisflavi and Trichoderma longibrachiatum exhibited above-moderate tolerance. The concentrations of target heavy metals before and after bioremediation were determined using electrochemical screen-printed electrodes (SPE) modified with different nanomaterials. The morpho-structural SEM/EDX analyses confirmed the presence of metal ions on the surface of the cell, with metal uptake being mediated by biosorption with hydroxyl, carboxyl, and amino groups as per FTIR observations. T. longibrachiatum was observed to pose a higher bioremediation potential compared to B. marisflavi, removing 87% of Cr and 67% of Zn, respectively. Conversely, B. marisflavi removed 86% of Pb from the solution, compared to 48% by T. longibrachiatum. Therefore, the fungal strain T. longibrachiatum could represent a viable option for Cr and Zn bioremediation strategies, whereas the bacterial strain B. marisflavi may be used in Pb bioremediation applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The status of environmental degradation has worsened over the last decades as a consequence of urbanization and industrialization, correlated with the generation of solid, liquid, and gaseous wastes. Recalcitrant pollutants, such as volatile organic compounds, heavy metals, pesticides, hydrocarbons, persistent organic pollutants, solvents, dyes, and plastics, can pose adverse effects on health [1,2,3,4]. Anthropogenic activities such as smelting, mining, fossil fuel refining, the application of agrochemicals, and the disposal of municipal wastes are the primary causes of the accumulation of heavy metals in soils and other environmental compartments [5,6,7]. Heavy metal contamination determines significant modifications to soil processes [8], the microbial community [9], plants [10], and animals [11].
Based on their physiological functionality, heavy metals may be essential (Zn2+, Mn2+, Fe2+, Cu2+, Co2+, Mo2+), playing a vital role in trace amounts in numerous metabolic processes, or non-essential (Pb2+, Hg2+, As3+, Cd2+, Cr6+), having no contribution to physiological and biochemical functions [12,13]. Both categories pose different levels of toxicity, depending on the concentration and duration of exposure [14]. The toxicity takes effect through inflammation and oxidative stress, which ultimately cause DNA damage due to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [15,16]. Lead has been commonly used for a wide range of products and industrial processes due to its malleability, ductility, and ease of being molded into alloys with other metals [17]. Zinc is the fourth most used metal for production purposes worldwide, along with iron, aluminum, and copper, having various applications in the chemical, pharmaceutical, agricultural, and automotive industries [18]. In the case of chromium, areas of application include electroplating, the production of stainless steel and nonferrous alloys, wood preservation, tanning, and the production of pigments and anti-corrosives [19]. The main detoxification processes employed by microorganisms in the presence of these heavy metals include uptake through functional groups present in the structure of the cellular wall and specific uptake systems [20], the synthesis of enzymes to reduce the pollutants to less toxic forms, such as the case for chromate reductase involved in the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) [21], complexation, volatilization, and intracellular sequestration [22].
Numerous bacterial species such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Micrococcus, and Enterobacter [23] and fungal species such as Penicillium, Aspergillus [24], Fusarium, Trichoderma, and Alternaria [25] have been studied for their bioremediation potential in heavy metal-contaminated environments. Conventional methods for treating environments contaminated with heavy metals and other toxic elements include physical, chemical, and biological approaches [26]. Physical methods seek to immobilize or mechanically extract pollutants to isolate the contaminated site and prevent further dispersion and contamination [27], whereas chemical methods utilize various reagents, even nanomaterials, to reduce the mobility, toxicity, and bioavailability of pollutants [28]. Both physical and chemical methods require high costs and affect the physico-chemical structure and environmental functions of the soil [29]. Furthermore, the wastes resulting from the treatments, along with the dispersion of fine particles during the displacement of soil for ex situ remediation, pose a significant risk of secondary pollution [30]. Biological methods seek to reduce the bioavailability and toxicity of pollutants by using microorganisms, plants, and algae, thus having the potential to be both economically and ecologically favorable, as well as more accepted by the public, aiding in ecological restoration [30].
Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficiency of microorganisms in reducing the concentration and toxicity of various heavy metals [31,32,33,34,35]. Long-term exposure generates modifications in species richness and diversity, with metal-resistant strains becoming dominant, albeit fewer in number [36]. Non-native microbial communities are in competition with the native microbiota and face difficulties in surviving in a polluted environment [37], whereas native strains develop tolerance over time through several extracellular and intracellular mechanisms, thus being more efficient in bioremediation [38,39,40]. Pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) was proposed for the first time in 1988 by Blanck et al. [41], which suggests that microbial communities exposed to xenobiotic compounds for a sufficient period of time could develop selective resistance as well as suffer modifications in species composition. In that sense, indigenous microbial strains have a higher bioremediation potential for pollutants compared to non-indigenous strains. In terms of determining the most efficient microbial strains for bioremediation, studies that compare the potential of bacteria and fungi are scarce. Also, there is a need to optimize the process in order to be applicable in situ. Furthermore, accessible detection methods for in-field monitoring of the efficiency of bioremediation treatments are required for the improvement of ecological restoration programs.
In Romania, the economic sectors with a significant contribution to heavy metal pollution are the mining and metallurgical industry, chemical production, and improper management of domestic and industrial wastes [42]. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were: (i) to isolate metal-tolerant indigenous microorganisms from soil contaminated with heavy metals; (ii) to test their efficiency in reducing the concentration of Cr, Pb, and Zn; and (iii) to compare the bioremediation potential exhibited by bacterial and fungal isolates. This is a complex study that aims to gain an understanding of the bioremediation process and ensure the monitoring and control of these heavy metals in various polluted environments, such as soil and waters, using portable, simple, and affordable (bio)analytical tools. Nanomaterials-based electrochemical sensors were used for fast and simple determination of the concentration of heavy metals in the samples before and after bioremediation, assessing in this way the efficiency of the process.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Tris hydrochloride (Tris-HCl), potassium chloride (KCl), hydrochloric acid (HCl), low molecular weight chitosan (CS, MW = 50–190 kDa), potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7), lead (II) nitrate Pb(NO3)2, zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO4·7H2O), potassium ferricyanide (K4Fe(CN)6), ferric chloride (FeCl3), tetrachloroauric(III) acid trihydrate, and sodium citrate were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. The multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) were purchased from Carbon GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany. The electrochemical measurements for chromium and zinc were carried out in a solution containing 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M KCl, and those for lead in a 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer pH 5, respectively. All solutions used in the experiments were prepared using ultrapure water (18.25 MΩ·cm) obtained with a Milli-Q® Integral 5 system, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Analytical grade HNO3 65%, HCl 37%, and HF 50% for the acid digestion of soil samples were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA. Standard solutions for chromium, lead, and zinc were obtained from Merck, KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. NaCl, as well as dehydrated culture media, namely PDA, TSA, PDB, TSB, Luria–Bertani, and Sabouraud, were obtained from Scharlau, Sentmenat, Spain.

2.2. Sample Collection

Soil samples were collected from Bucharest, Romania (44°26′06″ N 26°11′29″ E), in March 2023. The study area was characterized by a history of research and production in chemistry and petrochemistry between 1986 and 1997, as well as intense traffic and construction activities to date. At the time of sampling, vegetable cover was poorly developed, with scarce grassland patches. Four composite samples consisting of five subsamples were collected from random points over a surface of 200 m2 from the surface horizon at a depth of 5 cm. Sterile plastic utensils were used, and the samples were further stored in sterile autoclave bags to be transported to the laboratory for further processing. Samples were sieved through a 2 mm sieve and stored at 4 °C for the duration of the studies.

2.3. Elemental Analysis of Soil Samples

The heavy metal profile of the soil was determined using an Optima 2100 DV ICP-OES System (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a dual-view optical system. Dried and triturated soil in a quantity of 0.15 g was digested with HNO3, HCl, and HF (6:2:2) in a microwave digestion system (Multiwave 3000, Anton Parr GmbH, Graz, Austria). The obtained solutions were subsequently filtered and diluted with ultrapure water. Calibration curves for Cr, Pb, and Zn were constructed from Certipur standard solutions for each element.

2.4. Isolation and Identification of Microorganisms from the Contaminated Soil

Bacterial and fungal strains were isolated through serial dilutions. Samples consisting of 5 g of soil were suspended in 45 mL of physiologic sterile water (0.85% NaCl) and homogenized by incubating in a rotary shaker for 30 min at 170 rpm. Aliquots of 100 μL were subsequently spread aseptically onto agar plates supplemented with 10 mg/L of K2Cr2O7, ZnSO4, and Pb (NO3)2, which were further incubated for up to 7 days at 37° ± 1 °C (bacteria) and 28° ± 1 °C (fungi), respectively. Two different culture media were used for the growth and preservation of the isolated microorganisms: potato dextrose agar (PDA), consisting of (g/L): 4, potato peptone; 20, glucose; 15, agar, for fungal strains; and tryptic soy agar (TSA), consisting of (g/L): 20, peptone; 5, NaCl; 2.5, dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4); 2.5, dextrose; 15, agar, for bacterial strains.
Morphologically different colonies were further selected and purified by streaking repeatedly on agar media without metal salts. Characterization was carried out by Gram staining for bacteria and Lactophenol Cotton Blue staining for fungi, followed by microscopic observation using an Olympus BX51 optical microscope.
For the identification of the isolated microorganisms, Biolog phenotypic tests were employed, along with Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS). Fresh microbial colonies of 24 h for bacteria and 120 h for fungi previously grown on agar media were used. The metabolic patterns were determined with the Biolog System (Biolog, Hayward, CA, USA). In brief, culture suspensions were inoculated in a final volume of 100 µL into GEN III microplates in the case of bacteria and FF microplates in the case of fungi and incubated for 24 h at 33 °C and 26 °C, respectively. The plates were read using the Biolog MicroStationTM 3.5 software, and the results were compared with the database for identification. Metabolic reactions were observed through the reduction of tetrazolium redox dyes, which indicate the utilization of carbon sources and are displayed in various tones of pink and purple [43].
Results obtained using the Biolog Microstation were confirmed by MALDI-ToF MS (VITEK MS PRIME, bioMérieux, Marcy-l′Étoile, France). Microbial biomass obtained from fresh cultures was embedded in a matrix solution. The method involves the thermal desorption of ribosomal proteins from the crystallized matrix under the action of a laser beam, followed by the acceleration of electrically charged particles in vacuum conditions. The time taken by the charged particles to reach the detector differs based on mass and electric charge, thus offering a distinctive spectrum that leads to species-level identification [44].

2.5. Metal Tolerance Assessment and Effect on Microbial Growth

The resistance of the isolated microbial strains to chromium, lead, and zinc was characterized based on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and their tolerance index, as well as through observations on the effect of high concentrations of the mentioned metals on their growth rate.
The MIC was determined in 24-well plates (Figure 1) with liquid media supplemented with concentrations between 200 and 1000 mg/L of K2Cr2O7, ZnSO4, and Pb (NO3)2. The culture media used were TSB for bacteria and PDB for fungi. Briefly, a volume of 900 μL medium was inoculated aseptically with 100 μL microbial inoculum from fresh colonies (1 × 108 UFC/mL for bacteria and 1 × 107 UFC/mL for fungi). For bacterial samples, the plates were incubated for 24 h at 35 °C, followed by reading the optical density (OD) at a wavelength of 600 nm using a plate reader. For fungal samples, plates were incubated for 72 h at 28 °C, and growth was observed macroscopically. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration producing visible growth inhibition or morphological modifications.
The tolerance index to Cr, Pb, and Zn of the isolated strains was determined by two different methods dependent on the type of microorganism, as proposed by Oladipo et al. [45,46] and presented below.
Stock solutions of chromium, lead, and zinc were prepared by dissolving metallic salts in ultrapure water, further sterilized by filtration, to reach a final concentration of 1000 mg/L. Sterile Luria–Bertani Broth (g/L: 10, tryptone; 5, yeast extract; 5 NaCl) was amended with each metallic stock solution and inoculated with 10% fresh bacterial inoculum of OD 1.0. Simultaneously, an inoculated medium without metal served as a positive control, and an uninoculated medium with metal served as a negative control. Samples were incubated for 24 h at 35 °C, and bacterial growth was assessed by reading the optical density at 600 nm at 4 h intervals using the microplate reader. The optical densities of the samples were compared with the control following the incubation period.
For fungi, mycelia disks of 5 mm diameter from colonies pre-grown on PDA for 7 days were inoculated onto Sabouraud agar plates amended with the stock solutions in order to reach a final concentration of 1000 mg/L of K2Cr2O7, ZnSO4, and Pb (NO3)2. Positive and negative controls were also assembled. Plates were incubated at 28 °C for 7 days, and radial growth was measured daily. At the end of the incubation period, the samples were compared with the control. The tolerance index and percentage of inhibition were calculated based on the following equations:
Tolerance IndexBacteria = DOMe/DO
where DOMe = Optical density of the sample in the presence of heavy metal and DO = Optical density of the sample without heavy metal.
Tolerance IndexFungi = RGMe/RG
where RGMe = Radial growth (mm) of sample in the presence of heavy metal, and RG = Radial growth (mm) of sample without heavy metal.
Tolerance to the tested heavy metals was rated as follows: 0.00–0.39 (very low tolerance), 0.40–0.59 (low tolerance), 0.60–0.79 (moderate tolerance), 0.80–0.99 (high tolerance), and ≥1.00 (very high tolerance).
The growth inhibition induced by the contact with the tested heavy metals was calculated based on the equation used by Yaghoubian et al. [47], where the percentage of inhibition is determined by the radial growth (mm) or optical density of the control (C) and the radial growth (mm) or optical density of the sample grown in the presence of heavy metal (T).
Growth inhibition (%) = [(C − T)/C] × 100

2.6. Removal Efficiency Assessment

Following the tolerance screening, one multi-metal-tolerant strain displaying tolerance above the moderate level to chromium, lead, and zinc was selected from each group, and their metal removal efficiency was tested according to the methodology applied by Khan et al. [48]. The culture media used for the bioremediation experiments were Luria-Bertani (pH 6.0) for the bacterial strain and PDB (pH 7.0) for the fungal strain, amended with 100 mg/L K2Cr2O7, ZnSO4, and Pb(NO3)2 individually. A volume of 500 µL of fresh inoculum was added aseptically to 50 mL of culture media. Flasks were incubated for 72 h at 37 °C for bacteria and 120 h at 28 °C for fungi in a rotary shaker incubator at 160 rpm. After the incubation period, the samples were centrifuged at 8500 rpm/7350 rcf for 30 min at 4 °C. The biomass was further washed three times with sterile distilled water, dried for 12 h at 60 °C, and weighted.
The obtained supernatant was used for electrochemical determination of the heavy metal content by using different commercial screen-printed electrodes modified with different nanomaterials.
The metal removal efficiency was determined based on the equation proposed by Emenike et al. [49], where C0(x) is the initial concentration of the metal and Cf(0) is the final concentration of the metal:
Heavy metal removal efficiency (%) = [(C0(x) − Cf(0))/C0(x)] × 100

2.7. Electrochemical Detection of Heavy Metal Concentration in Solution

2.7.1. Electrochemical Measurements

Electrochemical measurements were carried out with a portable miniaturized µStat 4000 Multi Potentiostat/Galvanostat. A conventional electrochemical cell with three electrodes was used, and it consisted of commercial screen-printed electrodes (SPE) on ceramic supports. The working (4 mm diameter) electrodes were made of carbon (SPE, DRP-110) and, respectively, gold (AuSPE, DRP-220AT); the reference electrode was a silver pseudo-reference electrode, and the counter electrode was made of carbon. The electrochemical techniques used in the present study were cyclic voltammetry (CV) and amperometry, respectively. The CV studies were carried out in stationary solutions, using a scan rate of 0.1 V/s, by cycling the potential in different ranges depending on the studied metal. The amperometric studies were carried out in stirred solutions, with all potentials being referred to the Ag pseudo-reference electrode. All experiments were performed at room temperature.

2.7.2. Preparation of the Nanomaterials Based Electrochemical Sensors

The modification of the screen-printed electrodes was performed by using different nanocomposite materials, depending on the desired metal detection, in order to achieve a specific and selective determination of the targeted heavy metal. For chromium determination, the preparation of the sensors was adapted from a method described by Xing et al. [50]. Thus, carbon-paste SPE electrodes were modified with the redox mediator Prussian Blue by direct precipitation of a mixture of 0.1 M K3Fe(CN)6 and 0.1 M FeCl3 in a volumetric ratio of 1:1 onto the working electrode surface. The sensors, denoted as PB/SPEs were kept at room temperature for 10 min and then dried at 65 °C for 3 h.
For lead detection, carbon-paste SPE electrodes were modified with metallic nanoparticles. Gold nanoparticles (AuNP) with a diameter between 35 and 170 nm were synthesized according to a protocol adapted from Wu et al. [51] and Tukur et al. [52] using tetrachloroauric(III) acid trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O) and sodium citrate. A 0.50 mM HAuCl4·3H2O solution was stirred at 950 rpm and heated at 98 °C. A pre-heated 0.17 M sodium citrate solution was added, and the stirring and heating were continued for 20 min. The resulting solution was then cooled to room temperature, and a red-violet AuNP dispersion was obtained, which was centrifuged, and the AuNPs were collected and redispersed in ultrapure water.
Synthesized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were mixed with a solution of 0.5% chitosan in acetic acid at 2%, and a final volume of 10 μL was drop-casted on the surfaces of the working electrodes. The modified AuNPs-CS/SPEs sensors were maintained for 10 min at room temperature, and then they were dried for 1 h at 65 °C.
The MWCNTs-CS/PB/AuSPEs-based sensors were used for zinc determination, according to a work published by Ringgit et al. [53]. Thus, in a first step, commercial gold SPE electrodes were modified by drop casting a mixture of chitosan and MWCNTs (1:2) in acetic acid at 1%, followed by drying at room temperature for 2 h. Afterwards, the deposition of Prussian Blue redox mediator was carried out by direct precipitation of an equimolar mixture of 5 mM FeCl3 and K3Fe(CN)6 and drying the obtained sensors for 10 min at room temperature.
When not in use, all modified electrodes were stored at room temperature in the dark.

2.8. SEM-EDX and FTIR Analysis

The fungal biomass treated with 100 mg L−1 K2Cr2O7, ZnSO4, and Pb(NO3)2, respectively, along with the control biomass, grown in unamended media, were subjected to Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi, Chiyoda City, Tokio, Japan) coupled with Electron Dispersive X-ray (EDX) (Hitachi, Chiyoda City, Tokio, Japan) analysis to characterize the surface morphology of the samples upon exposure to the metallic ions. For this purpose, the samples were prepared by washing the fungal biomass three times with sterile distilled water, followed by drying it at 60 °C for 8 h. The dried biomass was further weighted and deposited onto carbon tapes, then sputtered (Quorum 150 R ES Plus Sputter Coater) (Quantum Design GmbH, Breitwieserweg, Germany) with a layer of 5 nm of gold under vacuum conditions for improved electrical conductivity. The samples were analyzed using a FEI Quanta 200 scanning electron microscope (FEI Company, Hillsboro, USA) with an acceleration voltage of 30 KV and 133 Pa chamber pressure. The EDX analysis was carried out using a Hitachi TM4000Plus microscope (Hitachi, Chiyoda City, Tokio, Japan).
In order to observe the functional groups involved in the adsorption of the metallic ions, spectral characterization of the treated and untreated biomass was carried out by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) using a Perkin Elmer FTIR at a scanning spectrum range between 400 cm−1 and 4000 cm−1.

2.9. Data Analysis

Each experiment was carried out in three replicates, and the mean values of the results along with the standard error were calculated. Tukey’s post hoc test (p-value < 0.05) was conducted where considered necessary. The significance threshold was set at a 95% confidence interval and a respective p value < 0.05. Correlations between selected parameters were also employed. All statistical analyses were performed using Past version 4.14 and Microsoft Excel (Professional Plus 2019).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Elemental Analysis of Contaminated Soil

The total concentration of the three heavy metals present in the soil samples is included in Table 1. Values varied among the four soil samples but were generally below the legal limits imposed by the European Union regulations of 200 mg/kg for Cr and Pb and 250 mg/kg for Zn, respectively [54]. The exception was observed for one sample whose concentration of Pb exceeded the legal concentration by 5%, as well as one sample for the concentration of Zn, where the concentration exceeded the legal limit by approximately 47%. As observed in Table 1, the total Cr concentration ranged between 80 and 170 mg/kg, the Pb content ranged between <4 and 211 mg/kg, and the Zn concentration ranged between 108 and 403 mg/kg. In two of the soil samples, the concentration of Pb was below the detection limit. It was observed that the sampling site furthest from the facility, namely 545 F—D4, contained the lowest concentrations of Cr, Pb, and Zn compared to the rest of the samples, whereas for the other three sampling sites, the three heavy metals were detected in similar concentrations. Zn was generally present in higher concentrations compared with Cr and Pb in all four soil samples.

3.2. Isolation and Identification of the Metal-Tolerant Microorganisms

A number of 16 microorganisms were isolated from the contaminated soil, of which seven strains were Gram-positive bacteria and nine strains were filamentous fungi. Optical microscopy images presenting their morphology are included in Figure 2. The bacteria group consists preponderately of strains from the phyla Firmicutes (86%) and Proteobacteria (24%). More than 50% of the bacterial strains belong to the Bacillus genera, which are frequently found in heavy metal-contaminated soils. The genetic and metabolic diversity ensure the involvement of Bacillus spp. in numerous ecological functions, which, along with their various resistant mechanisms against xenobiotics, make them important biotechnological agents [55]. The other species identified, including Solibacillus silvestris, Paenibacillus pabuli, and Achromobacter sp., are often isolated from various environments and are involved in numerous ecological functions such as nitrogen fixation, plant growth, and the production of industrially valuable enzymes [56,57], as well as bioremediation [58].
In regards to fungal species, 77% of the isolated strains belonged to the phylum Ascomycota, one strain to the phylum Zygomycota, and one to the phylum Oomycota. Strains from the genera Trichoderma, Fusarium, Mucor, and Aspergillus have been isolated from the contaminated soil. Other studies have also regularly isolated and identified these fungal genera from heavy metal-contaminated environments that also proved to be tolerant to high concentrations of these xenobiotic compounds [59,60,61,62]. Fungi are a highly diverse group, involved in numerous processes such as biological control, bioremediation, degradation of organic materials, and the sequestration and cycling of nutrients along the local trophic web [63]. Contamination with heavy metals and other xenobiotics decreases microbial diversity and relative abundance, more significantly for bacteria compared to fungi, leading to the changing of the community structure based on the “survival of the fittest” principle [64,65,66,67,68].

3.3. Metal Tolerance Assessment and Effect on Microbial Growth

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is presented in Table 2. For the isolated bacterial strains, Pb proved higher toxicity, displaying growth inhibition at the lowest concentration tested of 200 mg/L for 85% of the strains, compared to 57% for Cr and Zn, respectively. Two strains, specifically B. megaterium and B. cereus, were equally sensitive to the three metals, with growth inhibition beginning below 200 mg/L. The highest MIC observed was 800 mg/L in the case of S. silvestris in the presence of Pb, B. marisflavi in the presence of Cr, and B. subtilis in the presence of Zn. The strain Achromobacter sp. was moderately tolerant to Cr and Zn, with the MIC being 600 mg/L in both cases. P. pabuli was more tolerant to Zn compared to Cr and Pb, with the MIC observed in that case being 400 mg/L. Our findings correlate with the results confirmed by Altuğ et al. [69], who observed a higher resistance to Cr compared to Pb and Zn, with the MIC value being >2.5 mM for Bacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. Comparatively, fungi displayed higher tolerance in the sense that the growth of the majority of strains was inhibited at concentrations above 400 mg/L of metal salts, with the exception of P. glomerata, for which the MIC was 200 mg/L in the case of Cr. For 50% of the fungal strains, the highest MIC was 1000 mg/L in the presence of Zn, higher than the value observed for bacteria. H. jecorina was the only strain that presented a MIC of 1000 mg/L for both Pb and Zn. A total of 30% of the strains displayed a MIC of 800 mg/L in the presence of Cr and 20% in the presence of Zn. One strain, T. longibrachiatum, was evenly tolerant to the three metals, with the MIC observed being 800 mg/L.
Fungal strains appeared to be more tolerant to Zn, followed by Cr and Pb, whereas bacteria were more tolerant to Cr and Zn. Similar results were obtained by Rajapaksha [70] and Zeng et al. [71], who concluded that fungi were less sensitive to high concentrations of heavy metals compared to bacteria. Furthermore, the toxicity of Zn and Pb has been observed by Perelomov et al. [72] for Gram-positive as well as Gram-negative bacteria. In their study, observations were carried out for environmentally relevant species Pseudomonas chlororaphis, P. fluorescens, and Phodococsus RS67. In the case of fungi, Cr and Pb have been proven to be highly toxic. Muñoz et al. [73] observed that the MIC values were higher in the presence of Zn compared to Pb for fungal strains such as Penicillium sp., Galactomyces geotrichum, Pseudallescheria boydii, and Trichosporon sp. MIC values were similar for Cr and Pb.
To assess the effect of Cr, Pb, and Zn on microbial growth, the differences observed over a span of 24 h on the seven bacterial strains are highlighted in Figure 3. Zn was proven to exhibit a significantly higher bacteriostatic effect, inhibiting more than 50% of the growth of 85% of the strains, followed by Cr, with an efficiency of inhibiting bacterial growth in more than 70% of the strains, whereas Pb exhibited the least bacteriostatic effect, reducing the growth rate in about 42% of the strains.
The antibacterial efficiency of Zn ions observed through our research is consistent with previous studies. The study conducted by Mwandira et al. [74] concluded that concentrations of 10 mg/L and 50 mg/L of ZnCl2 completely inhibited bacterial growth, compared to Pb, as values above the threshold level determine the displacement of essential metals. Danilova et al. [75] observed that even low concentrations (0.005 M) of Zn in the form of ZnSO4 inhibited the growth of S. pyogenes and E. coli as well as biofilm formation. Abdalkader and Al-Saedi [76] tested the antibacterial efficiency of ZnSO4 in low concentrations, between 2 and 20 mg/mL, on a series of multidrug-resistant pathogens, such as S. aureus, S. epidermis, Proteus spp., P. aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp., and Klebsiella spp. In soil, long-term application of Zn salts affects the structure of the bacterial community in terms of species abundance [77]. Zn has also been repeatedly studied, particularly in the composition of nano-scale products, with antibacterial efficiency against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli, and S. typhimurium [78].
Similar results were observed in the presence of Cr, with the growth of 71% of the strains being inhibited above 50%, proving its bacteriostatic effect. On the other hand, Pb inhibited more than 50% of the growth of only 42% of the strains. An exceptional case was observed in the case of S. silvestris, for which the presence of a high concentration of Pb (NO3)2 stimulated the growth by 0.5%. Also, B. marisflavi was the only strain for which less than 35% of its growth was inhibited in the presence of each of the three metal salts. The higher toxicity of Cr compared to Pb can be explained by the uptake particularities employed by bacterial cells. Cr, in the form of the Cr6+ ion, is highly soluble and easily passes through sulfate transport channels due to its structural similarity with the SO42− anion [79]. Pb is bound inside the cell as Pb2+ by metallothioneins that are synthesized as a response to the presence of metals in the environment [80]. Both processes require energy expenditure, but Cr could be more readily available due to its competition with sulfur, which is an essential nutrient required for growth and normal metabolic functioning [81].
In regards to the fungistatic effect of the highest concentrations of K2Cr2O7, Pb(NO3)2, and ZnSO4 tested (Figure 4), it was observed that Cr exerted the highest toxicity, inhibiting more than 50% of the growth of 33% of the strains.
The high concentration of K2Cr2O7 also exerted a complete fungicidal effect in the case of two strains, namely G. candidum and A. niger. On the other hand, for one strain, namely H. jecorina, no inhibition of growth was observed. In the case of Zn, the presence of Zn2+ ions had a moderately inhibitory effect, stagnating more than 50% of the growth only for two strains, Mucor sp. and H. jecorina. The inhibition of mycelial growth was more significant for the latter, with the growth rate being reduced by 83%. One strain, T. longibrachiatum, did not exhibit any inhibition in mycelial growth. Contrastingly, Pb exhibited a significantly lower fungistatic effect, with no growth inhibition observed in 33% of the strains. An important mention is for A. niger, whose growth was stimulated by almost 40%. Similar results were obtained by Prakash et al. [82], who observed a positive correlation between increasing Pb concentrations and mycelial growth in media containing up to 200 ppm Pb, stimulating maximum growth.
Pb tolerance is generally sustained by increased proline synthesis in the presence of Pb2+, which acts as a detoxifying mechanism, an antioxidant defense mechanism, and a signaling agent [83]. Our results are consistent with the findings of Tian et al. [84], who observed that concentrations below 1000 mg/L stimulated the bioactivity of A. niger, represented by increased respiration and production of antioxidants. Long et al. [85] also observed that concentrations up to 300 mg/L of Pb(NO3)2 determined an increase in sclerotial biomass as a cause of the oxidative stress induced by the presence of Pb2+ ions.
A low dose of toxic compounds induces a hormesis effect that determines long-term adaptation to environmental stressors [86]. Various heavy metals have been proven to pose a stimulating effect on mycelial growth in low concentrations. For instance, a concentration of 3 ppm of Pb was able to stimulate the growth of Pythium debaryanum [87]. Other heavy metals, such as copper [88], cobalt [89], and cadmium [90], were proven to stimulate mycelial growth in low concentrations as a result of an increase in metabolic activity employed to withstand stressful conditions. Our findings at a much higher concentration of lead indicate the potential of A. niger for future bioremediation studies.
The heavy metal resistance of the microbial strains was tested at a concentration of 1000 mg/L of K2Cr2O7, ZnSO4, and Pb(NO3)2. The tolerance index ranged between 0.0, indicating a very low tolerance, and 1.02, indicating a very high tolerance (Figure 5).
Compared to the bacterial strains, the fungal strains were more tolerant to the three metals tested, which aligns with previous findings. The genera Trichoderma sp. showed generally high tolerance to Cr, Pb, and Zn. Out of the 9 fungal strains, T. longibrachiatum exhibited no growth reduction in the presence of Pb and Zn and a very low reduction of 24% in growth in the presence of Cr compared to the other strains, indicating its high tolerance to the three metals. Similar studies support our observations, with various Trichoderma isolates being resistant to high concentrations of heavy metals such as Ni, Cd [91], As, Pb [92], Co, Hg, and Zn [93].
Out of the three metals tested, Cr exhibited the highest level of toxicity towards both bacteria and fungi, as observed by the generally low tolerance values as well as the complete inhibition manifested in the cases of G. candidum and A. niger. The highest TI values observed for the microbial strains in the presence of Cr varied between 0.60 and 0.69. Moderate tolerance was observed in one bacterial strain, namely B. marisflavi, and in three fungal strains, T. citrinoviride, T. longibrachiatum, and H. jecorina, displaying moderate tolerance. According to Zapana-Huarache et al. [94], Trichoderma sp. presented higher tolerance to concentrations up to 1000 mg/L of K2Cr2O7 compared to other fungal strains such as Penicillium sp., yet still maintained a much lower level of tolerance compared to our results, with a TI of ≈0.2. Similar results were obtained by Kumar & Dwivedi [95], who observed a very low tolerance of approximately the same value for Trichoderma spp. In the presence of 1000 mg/L of K2Cr2O7 or even complete growth inhibition. Such an effect is caused by the accumulation of ROS, which induces significant cellular damage.
A similar sensitivity was observed in the presence of Zn, with only 37% of the strains displaying tolerance above the moderate level. The lowest value above the moderate limit was observed for F. fujikuroi, with the TI being 0.61. The other strains, including B. marisflavi and B. cereus for the bacteria group and G. candidum and T. longibrachiatum for the fungi group, presented high tolerance to zinc; respectively, B. cereus exhibited a very high tolerance with a TI > 1. Higher concentrations of Zn are known to hinder microbial growth due to its strongly oxidative nature [96]. Out of the three metals tested, 87% of the microbial strains displayed tolerance above the moderate level for Pb, with the lowest TI value registered being 0.63 in the case of P. glomerata. For bacteria, 57% of the strains displayed high tolerance, with TI values between 0.80 and 0.97, and one strain, P. pabuli, displayed a TI value of 1.01, indicating a very high tolerance. In regards to Pb toxicity for fungi, 55% of the strains displayed high tolerance, with TI values between 0.80 and 0.99. The strain T. longibrachiatum registered a TI of 1.02, having the highest tolerance to Pb out of the microbial strains studied.
Our results indicate a higher tolerance to Pb, followed by Zn, and a moderate tolerance to Cr for both bacteria and fungi. In contrast, Campillo-Cora et al. [97] reported a higher tolerance of the bacterial community to Zn compared to Pb, whereas Bérard et al. [98] proved that long-term exposure to Pb, even in a polymetallic contamination context, along with Zn, Cu, or Cd, induced Pb tolerance in both bacteria and fungi, inhibition being less intense in fungal communities. Compared to Cr, Zn, Co, Cd, Ni, and Cu, Pb tolerance was higher in bacteria at concentrations up to 2000 mg/L, which is attributed to the role of proline in lessening the damage produced to membranes and proteins attributed to increased oxidative stress [99]. The tolerance of the microbial community to heavy metals in soil is positively dependent on soluble or bioavailable metal fractions as well as soil parameters such as soil organic matter and pH [100]. Thus, long-term contamination with heavy metals determines an increase in metal tolerance as well as the dominance of resistant species.
From each group, one strain displayed multi-metal tolerance above the moderate level for Cr, Pb, and Zn, namely B. marisflavi and T. longibrachiatum. These strains proved to be moderately tolerant to Cr, with similar TI values of 0.60 and 0.62, respectively, whereas both strains displayed high and very high tolerance to Zn, followed by Pb, as observed by their TI values. We observe that T. longibrachiatum was overall more tolerant to the three metals compared to B. marisflavi, with the TI for Zn being 0.94 and 1.02 for Pb, whereas in the case of B. marisflavi, the values were slightly lower: 0.81 for Zn and 0.97 for Pb.
The metal tolerance of both genera has been extensively studied for bioremediation applications. Prakash et al. [82] assessed the tolerance of Trichoderma spp. to increasing concentrations of Pb and Zn. Low concentrations of Pb, up to 100 ppm, stimulate mycelia growth, with a decreasing tendency dependent on increasing Pb concentration. On the other hand, Trichoderma spp. proved to be more sensitive to increasing concentrations of Zn. Tansengco et al. [101] confirmed the tolerance of various Trichoderma isolates, such as T. virens, T. harzianum, T. gamsii, and T. saturnisporum, to high concentrations of Cr, Pb, Zn, Cu, and Ni, up to 1000 ppm.
For the Bacillus genera, several studies indicate the bioremediation potential of various Bacillus sp. isolates. Mardiyono et al. [102] observed the efficiency of Bacillus subtilis for the bioremediation of Ni sourced from the electroplating industry. Two novel Bacillus sp. strains were proven to be tolerant to concentrations of 100 mg/L Pb and Cd, with bioremediation efficiency using biosorption mechanisms, in the study conducted by Heidari and Panico [103]. Guo et al. [104] observed a 95% reduction in the concentration of Cr(VI) using Bacillus megatherium through enzymatic reduction, biosorption, and precipitation with phosphate. Bacillus altitudinis was observed to exhibit high tolerance to concentrations up to 20 mM Zn, as well as Cu, Ni, Cr, Pb, and Hg [105]. Further, Arroyo-Herrera et al. [106] reported the multi-metal resistance of Bacillus sp. to Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Zn, and As.
Ultimately, the present study provides valuable results regarding the use of both B. marisflavi and T. longibrachiatum strains for the efficient removal of heavy metals.

3.4. Removal Efficiency Assessment

The bioremediation assay was carried out at a concentration of 100 mg L−1 K2Cr2O7, Pb(NO3)2, and ZnSO4 individually, and the removal efficiency was quantified by detecting the differences in the concentration of the three metal salts prior to and after the microbial treatment using modified electrochemical sensors. Figure 6 depicts the removal efficiency of the two selected strains in correlation with the biomass produced during the incubation period in the presence of K2Cr2O7, Pb(NO3)2, and ZnSO4.
It was observed that T. longibrachiatum was significantly more efficient in removing Cr and Zn from solution, decreasing more than 45% of their concentration compared to B. marisflavi. Out of the three metals tested, T. longibrachiatum showed the highest removal efficiency in the case of Cr6+, decreasing 87% of its concentration in solution. The observed percentage removal of Zn2+ from solution was 67% and 48% for Pb2+, respectively. Interestingly, the presence of Cr inhibited biomass growth, from 0.10 g of the control to 0.7 g, whereas in the presence of Pb and Zn, biomass production was stimulated, increasing to 0.15 g and 0.14 g, respectively. Morphological alterations were also observed for the biomass grown in media amended with Cr, Pb, and Zn, respectively, characterized by the clumping and breakage of the hyphae as well as elongations and deformations. A negative correlation was observed between biomass production and removal efficiency, as the lowest biomass produced bioaccumulated the highest percentage of metal ions. The high concentrations of heavy metals exert severe stress on the fungal strain, inhibiting growth as metabolic mechanisms are employed for controlling the accumulation of ROS as a result of oxidative stress [107]. The bioaccumulation of metal ions from the environment involves passive processes such as biosorption onto the cellular surface as well as active processes, namely intracellular sequestration [108]. Biosorption is one of the first mechanisms employed in contact with pollutants, involving ion exchange, complexation, and physical adsorption due to the negative charge of the functional groups within the structure of the cell wall [109].
The uptake efficiency of the biomass of B. marisflavi was the lowest in the case of Cr, with a decrease in concentration of about 7%, followed by Zn, with a 19% decrease in concentration. On the other hand, a reduction of 87% in the concentration of Pb was obtained. Visible morphological modifications were also observed in the Pb-treated samples, with the biomass acquiring a brown color, attributed to the biotransformation of Pb2+ ions through precipitation catalyzed by phosphatase [110,111]. The high tolerance of the bacterial strain to Pb was positively correlated with its bioremediation efficiency, having the highest tolerance index compared to Zn and Cr as well. Similar results in regards to Pb remediation were obtained by Njoku et al. [112] using Bacillus megaterium with an efficiency of removing 73% of Pb from solution, whereas Mohapatra et al. [113] obtained over 97% removal of Pb2+ using live and dead Bacillus xiamenenensis biomass under optimized conditions. The low removal efficiency of B. marisflavi, despite its high tolerance to Cr and Zn, is linked to the particularities of its resistance mechanisms. Shaw & Dussan [114] demonstrated the behavior of efflux pumps in Bacillus cereus B6 in the presence of Pb, As, and Cr as a detoxifying mechanism employed in order to control the intracellular metal concentration. Furthermore, post-efflux mechanisms are initiated to restrict the metal ions from being reabsorbed within the cell [115]. Another resistance mechanism involves the precipitation of the metal into insoluble salts for the purpose of reducing their bioavailability [116].
Studies on the efficiency of B. marisflavi in removing heavy metals from the environment are scarce [117,118]. The strain has been observed to degrade benzyl butyl phthalate and dimethyl phthalate [119], as well as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [120] and pesticides such as chlorpyrifos [121], indicating its vast metabolic capacities for bioremediation. Mishra & Doble [117] proved the efficiency of B. marisflavi to reduce more than 90% of the concentration of Cr6+ from a solution containing 200 mg/L of K2Cr2O7, but at a lower pH of 4.0. Therefore, additional studies are required to determine the influence of pH on bioremediation efficiency as well as understand the particular resistance mechanisms employed by B. marisflavi. Kayalvizhi & Kathiresan [118] obtained a removal of 70% of Zn, 62.5% of Cu and Pb, and 44% of Mn from solution using B. marisflavi under optimized conditions. Through our study, we have proved the high efficiency of B. marisflavi for Pb bioremediation.
Resistant strains are expected to be able to uptake substantially more metal ions from the environment compared to sensitive strains. Numerous studies show a positive correlation between the high tolerance index of microbial strains and their removal efficiency for various metals [122,123,124,125], yet our findings indicate the absence of such correlation in the case of Zn and Cr, proving the necessity of more in-depth studies on microbial heavy metal resistance as well as removal mechanisms. Microorganisms possess various resistance mechanisms against heavy metals with the primary role of preventing toxicity, which may not consequently determine the removal of heavy metals from the environment, such as extracellular efflux, metal-sensing regulators that repress genes involved in metal uptake, and enzymatic reduction [126].

3.5. Electrochemical Detection of Heavy Metals Concentration

3.5.1. Cyclic Voltammetry Studies

For the chromium detection using the PB/SPE sensors, the cyclic voltammograms recorded in a solution containing 0.1 M KCl and 0.1 M HCl highlighted the presence of two cathodic peaks at 0.01 V and 0.28 V potentials, which were attributed to the PB and Cr6+ reduction, respectively. The electrochemical properties of PB emphasized by the cyclic voltammograms obtained in the electrolyte solution in the presence of a cathodic and an anodic peak are based on the following coupled reactions:
PB ⟺ Everitt’s salt and
PB ⟺ Prussian yellow (PY).
The corresponding equations are:
KFeIII[Fe2+(CN)6] + K++e ⟺ K2FeII[Fe2+(CN)6]
KFeIII[Fe2+(CN)6] ⟺ FeIIIFe3+(CN)6 + K+ + e
As can be seen in Figure S1, an increase in the cathodic peak current with an increase in chromium concentration is observed, demonstrating the electrocatalytic behavior of the redox mediator towards chromium reduction. A value of +0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl was selected as a working potential for further amperometric detection of Cr6+.
The formal reduction potential of Pb2+ at the surface of AuNPs-CS/SPE sensors was determined to be −0.45 V vs. Ag/AgCl, and this potential value was further used in the amperometric studies in order to determine the analytical performance of the developed sensor for Pb2+ detection (Figure S2).
The determination of Zn2+ content was carried out by cyclic voltammetry using the developed MWCNTs-CS/PB/AuSPE based sensors. The voltammograms were recorded in 0.1 M KCl and 0.1 M HCl as supporting electrolyte solutions in the absence and presence of different concentrations of Zn2+, from 0.01 to 4.17 mM, by sweeping the potential from −0.5 to −2.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl. (Figure S3).
The intensity of the reduction peaks increases with the increase in zinc concentration, thus indicating the electrocatalytic effect of the developed sensor for the detection of Zn2+ due to the increase in the active surface and the kinetic transfer of electrons (Figure S3A). It was also observed that the cathodic potential peak shifted with the increase in Zn2+ concentration to lower values.
The cyclic voltammetry technique was used to obtain the calibration curve for Zn2+ by using the developed sensor (Figure S3B). The analytical performances of the developed MWCNT-CS/PB/AuSPE sensor for Zn2+ determination were very good, with a specific sensitivity of 3.682 A·M−1·cm−2 being obtained for a linear concentration range extended up to 0.833 mM and a detection limit of 0.2 μM.

3.5.2. Amperometric Studies

The Cr6+ detection was performed by using the PB/SPE-based sensor at an applied working potential of +0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl by successive additions of increasing volumes of 0.1 M potassium dichromate (Figure S4).
The optimization of the working potential for chromium determination was performed by carrying out calibrations of the sensor at different applied potential values (Table S1). An applied potential value of +0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl will be used for the determination of chromium content in real samples.
The reproducibility of PB-based sensors for Cr detection was determined by carrying out calibrations with the other three PB/SPE sensors in the same conditions. The obtained average specific sensitivity was 336.8 ± 42.1 mA·M−1·cm−2 (RSD = 11.6%), demonstrating the good reproducibility of the sensors modified with Prussian Blue redox mediator for the detection of Cr.
The stability studies were carried out by amperometric measurements, with an average current value determined for the PB-based sensor of 8.70 ± 0.96 μA (RSD = 11.6%) being obtained, demonstrating in this way the good inter-operational stability of the PB/SPE-based sensor for Cr determination (Figure S5).
For the amperometric determination of lead, calibration of the AuNP-CS-based sensor was performed at an applied potential value of −0.45 V in the electrolyte solution of 0.1 M Tris-HCl (Figure S6).
The determination of Pb2+ was achieved in a linear range of concentrations from 0.017 to 0.515 mM, with a specific sensitivity of 20.66 mA·M−1·cm−2 and a detection limit of 34.7 µM. Thus, the developed sensor based on AuNPs-CS showed good analytical performance for Pb detection and was further used for the determination of the heavy metal in the real samples.

3.6. Electrochemical Detection of Heavy Metals in Treated and Untreated Supernatant

After the development and electrochemical characterization of the sensors modified with different nanomaterials, they were further used to determine the heavy metal content in control solutions containing uninoculated culture media amended with a known concentration of Cr6+, Pb2+, and Zn2+ (100 mg/L), respectively, and in test solutions represented by culture media amended with metal salts and inoculated with individual microbial strains with potential for heavy metal bioremediation.
The concentrations of Cr6+, Pb2+, and Zn2+ determined with the nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors, as well as the decrease in heavy metal content due to microorganism biosorption expressed as a percentage, are shown in Table 3.
Thus, the determination of Zn2+ in real samples was carried out by cyclic voltammetry, while Cr6+ and Pb2+ detection were achieved by amperometric measurements. The equations used for the calculations are: Y (µA) = 42.898 (mM) X + 5.306 for Cr6+; Y (µA) = 2.594 (mM) X + 0.803 for Pb2+; and Y (µA) = 462.78 (mM) X + 285.9 for Zn2+, respectively. The values of the reduction currents recorded for each injected sample volume were interpolated on the calibration curves previously determined for the sensors used.
The bioremediation capacity of the microorganisms for each heavy metal species was correlated with the percentage decrease in metal concentration in the culture medium before and after incubation with the bacteria or fungi species.
The highest decrease in heavy metal concentration was observed for the sample containing Pb2+ and inoculated with the bacterial strain B. marisflavi and for the sample with Cr6+ inoculated with the fungal strain T. longibrachiatum, with values of over 85%, which shows a significant bioremediation capacity.

3.7. SEM/EDX Characterization of the Microbial Biomass

The surface morphology of the biomass of B. marisflavi and T. longibrachiatum before and after treatment with K2Cr2O7, Pb(NO3)2, and ZnSO4 was analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy coupled with Energy-Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX) to assess the impact of exposure to heavy metals. For B. marisflavi, only the biomass treated with Pb(NO3)2 and ZnSO4 was further analyzed, as the Cr-treated sample was detected to have the lowest remediation efficiency, removing less than 10% of the metal ions from solution, and no macroscopic alterations of the biomass were observed.
The SEM micrographs of B. marisflavi presented in Figure S7 exhibited normally developed bacterial cells, characterized by numerous rod-shaped bacteria with a smooth surface, entrapped in a biofilm structure for the control sample. As expected, EDX analysis indicated the absence of Pb and Zn.
Following the adsorption of Pb from solution, deformations and irregularities in the shape of the cells were observed, as well as their aggregation in an unregulated shape with a distinctive metallic glow as a result of Pb2+ biosorption [127]. The EDX spectral image indicates the adsorption of 9.5% Pb2+ onto the surface of the cell. Furthermore, differences in the atomic percentage of elements oxygen (O) and phosphorous (P) were observed following Pb uptake, represented by a decrease from 24.1% to 8.5% for O and, respectively, an increase from 3.1% to 5.4% for P, indicating the formation of covalent bonds between Pb2+ and functional groups containing O and P elements such as amino and phosphate [128]. For the Zn-treated biomass, deformations were observed regarding the shape of the cells, although less severe compared to the Pb-treated biomass. EDX imaging confirms the presence of Zn2+ on the surface of the cell in a percentage of 0.4%, as well as differences in the percentage of O and P, similar to the Pb-treated sample. A decrease in oxygen from 24.1% to 18.3% was observed, as well as an increase in P from 3.1% to 4.9%. Also, an increase in K from 2.3% to 5.4% was detected, indicating interactions with the specific functional groups. The low percentage of Zn2+ indicates that adsorption is not the primary uptake mechanism of B. marisflavi, whereas extracellular uptake is more prominent in contact with Pb. The greater affinity of the bacterial biomass for Pb compared to Zn can be attributed to the larger ionic size and higher electronegativity of the former, an effect observed by Wierzba [129] as well.
Compared with the biosorption efficiency reported by other studies focusing on Bacillus sp. [130,131], for which Pb was detected in a percentage of 1.77% and 4.77%, respectively, onto the surface of the cell, the present study indicates a better biosorption potential. On the other hand, other studies obtained a removal of lead through biosorption of 79%, 85%, and 87%, respectively, using B. licheniformis, B. subtilis, and B. cereus [132], thus indicating the diversity of bioremediation mechanisms by different Bacillus strains. The peptidoglycan layer of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria determines the anionic nature of the cell wall, allowing for metal binding to its surface. Additionally, teichoic acid and teichuronic acid are included within the structure of the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria, providing more binding sites compared to Gram-negative bacteria [133]. The biosorption capacity varies as a consequence of the dissimilarities in the functional groups present within the cellular structure of the microorganisms; the main binding sites for metal ions are carbonyl, carboxyl, hydroxyl, amino, and sulfhydryl groups [134].
SEM micrographs of T. longibrachiatum biomass presented in Figure S8 highlight the structural alterations exerted by contact with heavy metals. The control sample presents normally developed hyphae, uniform in shape, organized as thin, smooth clusters. Following treatments with 100 mg/L of Cr, Pb, and Zn, visible morphological alterations were observed. Mycelia of T. longibrachiatum exhibited elongation, thickening, and clustering of hyphae, as well as dense depositions on the surface, more visible for the Cr and Zn-treated samples, indicating the adsorption of Cr6+, Pb2+, and Zn2+ ions. Such modifications have also been reported in other studies [135,136,137]. The structural alterations are a result of interferences in the deposition of chitin within the cell wall structure as well as the adsorption of metal onto the cell surface, which determine morphological modifications of the hyphae such as shrinkage and wrinkles, as indicated by Tu et al. [138].
EDX spectral images offered supporting results for the premise of metallic ions adsorbed onto the cell surface. In the case of the Cr-treated sample, Cr was detected at an atomic percentage of 20.5% adsorbed onto the surface of the cell. Compared with the control sample, a decrease in the percentage of C from 71.3 to 67.3 was observed, indicating interactions between C-rich functional groups and Cr6+ ions. Furthermore, an increase in O, K, and Al from 21.5%, 3.2%, and 0.9% to 34.8%, 4.9%, and 9.2%, respectively, suggests the sequestration of Cr6+ within complexes such as aluminum polyphosphates [139]. On the other hand, the presence of Zn2+ and Pb2+ was detected in much lower amounts, around 0.1%, respectively. A decrease in concentration for C, K, P, Al, and S was detected from 71.3%, 3.2%, 2.2%, 0.9%, and 0.7% to 60.7%, 0.5%, 0.7%, 0.5%, and 0.1% in the case of the Pb-treated biomass, as well as 57.7%, 1.0%, 1.1%, 0.1%, and 0.2%, respectively, for the Zn-treated biomass. Such observations indicate the precipitation of Pb2+ and Zn2+ ions as insoluble metal complexes on the surface of the cell wall [140].
Thus, it was observed that a significant percentage of Cr was removed by biosorption, whereas Pb and Zn uptake was mediated primarily by intracellular bioaccumulation. Similar findings were reported by Zhang et al. [141] for T. brecivompactum as well as Hlihor et al. [142] for T. viride, although T. longibrachiatum presented a stronger biosorption efficiency compared to the latter, adsorbing 20.5% Cr as opposed to 3.1%. Also, the T. longibrachiatum strain used in the present study presented higher Cr biosorption compared to other genera that have been the subject of recent studies, such as Aspergillus terriocola [143] and Penicillium simplicissimum [144].

3.8. FTIR Characterization of the Microbial Biomass

Figure S9 presents the FTIR spectra of B. marisflavi biomass in the absence and presence of Pb and Zn, respectively. The presence of Pb2+ and Zn2+ ions induced changes in the peaks of the functional groups. For the Pb-treated sample, the intensity of the broad peak observed at 3279 cm−1 ascribed to the O-H stretching vibration decreased slightly to 3278 cm−1. A more significant difference is observed by the appearance of two peaks at 2874 cm−1 and 2854 cm−1, attributed to the symmetric and asymmetric C-H stretching vibrations. A similar effect was observed in the case of the Zn-treated sample, characterized by the appearance of a band at 2849 cm−1, indicating the interaction of the metal ions and the alkene group [145]. The peaks at 1635 cm−1 and 1538 cm−1 ascribed to the C=O stretching vibrations of the amide I and amide II groups did not suffer significant modifications, with a slight increase at 1636 cm−1 in the case of the Zn-treated sample and a slight decrease to 1537 cm−1 for the Pb-treated sample. The peaks in the range 1450–1150 cm−1 are attributed to the carboxyl and phosphate groups, where notable differences are observed for the Zn and Pb-treated samples. A decrease in the peak at 1393 cm−1 to 1390 cm−1 and 1380 cm−1, respectively, as well as an increase in the intensity of the peak from 1227 cm−1 to 1232 cm−1 were detected. Furthermore, the appearance of new peaks at 1310 cm−1 and 1155 cm−1 suggests the interaction of the Zn2+ and Pb2+ ions with the aforementioned functional groups [146].
Noticeable differences were also observed in the case of the peak at 933 cm−1 attributed to the C-O stretching vibration of the alcohol group, which disappeared in the case of the Zn-treated biomass and shifted to 964 cm−1 in the case of the Pb-treated biomass. Also, a new peak was observed at 777 cm−1 which is ascribed to the C-H bending vibration, indicating interactions with the carboxyl group. The decrease in the intensity of the peak at 529 cm−1 to 520 cm−1 and 516 cm−1 in the presence of Zn2+ and Pb2+, respectively, as well as the appearance of a new peak at 467 cm−1 associated with the S-S stretching vibration, indicate interactions with the disulfide group [147].
FTIR analysis confirmed the involvement of carboxyl, hydroxyl, carbonyl, and amide I and II bands in the metal uptake by the surface of the bacterial cell, with interactions between Pb2+ and Zn2+ being observed by the appearance of specific bands in the spectral regions of 2850–2875 cm−1, 1150 cm−1, 770 cm−1, and 460 cm−1, as well as the displacement of the peak at 933 cm−1 and the decrease in intensity of the vibration of several peaks attributed to the aforementioned functional groups. Noticeable modifications were observed for both the Zn-treated biomass as well as the Pb-treated biomass, suggesting the effect exerted by the contact with the metal ions onto the surface of the cell wall, which is similar to the observations reported by Liaqat et al. [148].
Figure S10 displays the FTIR spectra of Trichoderma longibrachiatum biomass prior to and following the treatment with Cr, Pb, and Zn. The absorption bands indicated three primary functional groups: amino, carbonyl, and amide. Differences in the intensity and shape of the peaks could be observed between the control and the metal-treated samples. The broad signal at 3300 cm−1, corresponding to stretching vibrations of O-H and N-H bonds from the carboxylic group, and the hydroxyl group decreased to 3277 cm−1 in the presence of Cr and Zn, respectively, and to 3280 cm−1 in the presence of Pb. The bands at 2923 cm−1 and 2853 cm−1 are ascribed to the C-H symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations of the methylene group [149]. A decrease in signal intensity was observed for the Zn and Pb-treated biomass compared to the control sample. Furthermore, changes in shape and position of the peaks were observed in the presence of the metallic ions. The relative intensity of the C=O stretching vibration band at 1744 cm−1, attributed to the ester group in lipids, decreased in the samples treated with Cr, Pb, and Zn. The amide I band at 1649 cm−1 suffered a decrease in intensity between 1635 cm−1 and 1637 cm−1 as a result of the contact with metallic ions. On the other hand, no differences in intensity could be observed for the amide II band at 1545 cm−1 corresponding to the stretching vibrations of C=O bonds [150]. In the fingerprint region, slight modifications in the intensity of the vibrations could be observed for the Zn-treated biomass, but the more significant differences were noticed for the Cr and Pb-treated biomass. In the case of the former, a new band appeared at 1406 cm−1, attributed to the C=O symmetric stretching vibration of the COO-group. In the case of the Pb-treated biomass, the disappearance of the bands at 1315 cm−1 and 1236 cm−1 was detected, attributed to the α-helices and ß-sheets of the amide III band owing to the combination of CH stretching and NH bending vibrations [151]. A new band was observed between 1073 cm−1 and 1076 cm−1 for the samples treated with Pb and Zn, which indicates the interaction of the metal ions with the phosphate and sulfoxide groups. Also, in the case of the Zn-treated sample, the disappearance of the band at 888 cm−1 ascribed to the aromatic C-H stretching vibration was observedThe shifting of the band from 558 cm−1 to 520–528 cm−1 for the metal-treated samples may be from the formation of C-S groups [152].
FTIR analysis revealed modifications in vibrational frequencies on the surface of T. longibrachiatum biomass following treatment with Cr, Pb, and Zn, proving the biosorption activity of the cell wall. The biosorption mechanisms were mainly based on physicochemical interactions between the metal ions and the functional groups, with the most noticeable differences being observed in the spectral regions of 2930–2850 cm−1, 1740 cm−1, 1649 cm−1, 1450–1200 cm−1 and 550 cm−1, which are attributed to the functional groups of lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates [153].

4. Conclusions

In this study, a number of sixteen metal-tolerant bacteria and fungi were isolated from soil contaminated with Cr, Pb, and Zn, belonging to the phyla Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Ascomycota, Zygomycota, and Oomycota. Zn and Cr presented a high bacteriostatic effect on the isolated bacterial strains, whereas Cr exerted strong fungistatic effects on the fungal strains. The microorganisms studied displayed tolerance at various levels in the following order: Pb > Zn > Cr. Bacillus marisflavi and Trichoderma longibrachiatum exhibited tolerances above the moderate level for all three metals tested. Innovative electrochemical sensors modified with different materials were developed for the detection of differences in the concentrations of heavy metals prior to and following microbial remediation.
Good accuracy for the determination of heavy metal contents in real samples was achieved with nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors. Simple and fast determination of chromium, lead, and zinc was performed by cyclic voltammetry and amperometry using screen-printed carbon or gold electrodes modified with redox mediators, Prussian Blue, or nanocomposites materials. High sensitivities and good reproducibility were achieved in the detection of targeted heavy metals, allowing a sensitive and selective determination of their content in the real samples.
The bioremediation assay coupled with electrochemical detection revealed the higher removal efficiency of T. longibrachiatum compared to B. marisflavi for Cr and Zn. The concentration of Cr was reduced by more than 85% in solution, followed by Zn with a removal of 67%. On the other hand, B. marisflavi reduced 87% of the concentration of Pb, exhibiting higher efficiency compared to T. longibrachiatum, which only reduced 48% of the concentration of Pb in solution.
Further analyses indicated the mechanisms of action of both strains in contact with metal salts, individually. SEM micrographs indicated morphological alterations as a result of heavy metal stress and interactions between the metal ions and the microbial cells. EDX spectra confirmed the accumulation of metals on the surface of cells, or the prevalence of intracellular accumulation. FTIR spectra indicate the involvement of carboxyl, phosphate, carbonyl, and disulfide functional groups in the biosorption process.
The main limitation of bioremediation studies Is the difference between laboratory results and in-field observable effects due to the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on microbial metabolism and the efficiency of xenobiotic removal. In order to improve the remediation process and support ecosystem services for the long term, ecological restoration combined with biological methods can be used. Both Bacillus sp. and Trichoderma sp. can assist in phytoremediation by reducing the effects of stress induced upon plants as well as enhancing the removal of heavy metals from the environment. Environmental biotechnology is a continuously evolving area of research; therefore, it is necessary to gain a better understanding of the most promising microbial strains and develop methods to improve, control, and monitor the remediation potential of indigenous strains for in situ applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jox14010004/s1, Figure S1: Cyclic voltammograms recorded on the surface of the PB/SPE sensor: in the absence and in the presence of Cr6+ at different concentrations; Figure S2: Cyclic voltammograms recorded at the surface of the AuNPs/CS/SPEs sensor in the absence and in the presence of Pb2+ at different concentrations; Figure S3: Detection of Zn2+ using the MWCNTs-CS/PB/AuSPE sensor in cyclic voltammetry: (A) Voltammograms obtained in the electrolyte solution in the absence and in the presence of different concentrations of Zn2+; (B) Calibration curve for the variation of the reduction peak current in cyclic voltammetry vs. concentration of Zn2+; Figure S4: Calibration curve obtained for Cr6+ ion detection using the PB/SPE sensor (applied potential 0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 0.1 M KCl + 0.1 M HCl). Inset: representation of current intensity dependence on Cr6+ concentration; Figure S5: Stability of sensors modified with Prussian Blue for the determination of 1 mM Cr6+; Figure S6: Amperometric detection of Pb2+ ions using the AuNPs-CS/SPE sensor (E = −0.45 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 5). Inset: Representation of current intensity dependence on Pb2+ concentration; Figure S7: Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) and EDX spectra of Bacillus marisflavi biomass (A) control, (B) Pb treated, (C) Zn treated; Figure S8: Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) and EDX spectra of Trichoderma longibrachiatum biomass (A) control, (B) Cr treated, (C) Pb treated, (D) Zn treated; Figure S9: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy spectra of Bacillus marisflavi biomass before and after treatment with Pb (NO3)2 and ZnSO4; Figure S10: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy spectra of Trichoderma longibrachiatum biomass before and after treatment with K2Cr2O7, Pb (NO3)2 and ZnSO4; Table S1: Optimization of the working potential and the performance parameters for the amperometric detection of Cr6+ using Prussian Blue modified SPEs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.F., A.-M.G., R.C.F. and T.E.Ș.; Methodology, C.F., L.J. and M.D.; Conceived and designed the experiments, C.F., M.C., I.R., A.-M.G. and C.P.; Performed the experiments, C.F., M.C., L.C., M.-L.J., A.M.B., D.P. and N.O.C.; Formal and data analysis, C.F., A.-M.G., L.-G.Z., L.J. and I.R.; writing—original draft preparation, C.F. and L.-G.Z.; writing—review and editing, A.-M.G., M.C., L.J. and M.D.; visualization, L.J., M.D., L.-G.Z. and R.C.F.; supervision, A.-M.G., L.J. and T.E.Ș.; project administration, R.C.F.; funding acquisition, C.F. and A.-M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded through the PN 23.06 Core Program—ChemNewDeal within the National Plan for Research, Development and Innovation 2022–2027, developed with the support of the Ministry of Research, Innovation, and Digitization, project no. PN 23.06.01.01/2023-AQUAMAT and within PNCDI III, Program 1—Development of the national research and development system—Subprogram 1.2—Institutional performance—Projects to finance excellence in RDI, Contract no. 15PFE/2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The support provided by the Ministry of Research, Innovation, and Digitization, CCCDI—UEFISCDI, through project number PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2021-1942, contract no 662/2022—AMI-FOOD. The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical support in morpho-structural analysis of Monica Raduly and Elvira Alexandrescu from the National Institute for Research and Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry—ICECHIM Bucharest.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study, in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, in the writing of this manuscript, or in the decision to publish these results.

References

  1. Ukaogo, P.O.; Ewuzie, U.; Onwuka, C.O. Environmental pollution: Causes, effects, and the remedies. In Microorganisms for Sustainable Environment and Health; Chowdhary, P., Raj, A., Verma, D., Akhter, Y., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 21, pp. 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Khomenko, S.; Cirach, M.; Pereira-Barboza, E.; Mueller, N.; Barrera-Gomez, J.; Rojas-Rueda, D.; Hoogh, K.; Hoek, G.; Nieuwenhujsen, M. Premature mortality due to air pollution in European cities: A health impact assessment. Lancet Planet. Health 2021, 5, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Münzel, T.; Hahad, O.; Daiber, A.; Landrigan, P.J. Soil and water pollution and human health: What should cardiologists worry about? Cardiovasc. Res. 2023, 119, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Burkhardt, J.; Bayham, J.; Wilson, A.; Carter, E.; Berman, J.D.; O’Dell, K.; Ford, B.; Fischer, E.V.; Pierce, J.R. The effect of pollution on crime: Evidence from data on particulate matter and ozone. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2019, 98, 102267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mishra, S.; Singh, G.; Gupta, A.; Tiwari, R.K. Heavy Metal/Metalloid Contamination: Their Sources in Environment and Accumulation in Food Chain. In Heavy Metal Toxicity: Environmental Concerns, Remediation and Opportunities; Singh, R.P., Singh, P., Srivastava, A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; Volume 2, pp. 19–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, C.; Zhou, K.; Qin, W.; Tian, C.; Qi, M.; Yan, X.; Han, W. A Review on Heavy Metals Contamination in Soil: Effects, Sources, and Remediation Techniques. Soil Sediment Contam. 2019, 28, 380–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Watari, T.; Nansai, K.; Nakajima, K. Major metals demand, supply and environmental impacts to 2100: A critical review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 164, 105107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pouresmaieli, M.; Ataei, M.; Forouzandeh, P.; Azizollahi, P.; Mahmoudifard, M. Recent progress on sustainable phytoremediation of heavy metals from soil. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhong, X.; Chen, Z.; Ding, K.; Liu, W.S.; Baker, A.J.M.; Fei, Y.H.; Wang, Y.; Jin, C.; Wang, S.; Tang, Y.T.; et al. Heavy metal contamination affects the core microbiome and assembly processes in metal mine soils across Eastern China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 443, 130241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Emenike, C.U.; Jayanthi, B.; Agamuthu, P.; Fauziah, S.H. Biotransformation and removal of heavy metals: A review of phytoremediation and microbial remediation assessment on contaminated soil. Environ. Rev. 2018, 26, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shen, X.; Chi, Y.; Xiong, K. The effect of heavy metal contamination on humans and animals in the vicinity of a zinc smelting facility. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0207423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liang, Y.; Pan, Z.; Zhu, M.; Gao, R.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, N. Exposure to essential and non-essential trace elements and risks of congenital heart defects: A narrative review. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1121826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Unitted States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Framework for Metals Risk Assessment, Office of the Science Advisor Risk Assessment Forum, EPA 120/R-07/001, 2007, 1–11. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/risk/framework-metals-risk-assessment (accessed on 1 October 2023).
  14. Rigueto, V.T.C.; Nazari, M.T.; Pizzutti, I.R.; Chandrasekaran, N.; Dettmer, A.; Piccin, J.S. Toxic Metals An Overview of Main Sources, Exposure Routes, Adverse Effects and Treatment Approaches. In Toxic Metals Contamination Generation, Disposal, Treatment and Valuation; Piccin, J.S., Dettmer, A., Chandrasekaran, N., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  15. Balali-Mood, M.; Naseri, K.; Tahergorabi, Z.; Khazdair, M.R.; Sadeghi, M. Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Monga, A.; Fulke, A.B.; Dasgupta, D. Recent developments in essentiality of trivalent chromium and toxicity of hexavalent chromium: Implications on human health and remediation strategies. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022, 7, 100113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Colás, R. Ancient Lead, Mercury, and Tin. In Reverse Engineering of Ancient Metals; Carrizo, P.S., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pola, A.; Tocci, M.; Goodwin, F.E. Review of Microstructures and Properties of Zinc Alloys. Metals 2020, 10, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Laxmi, V.; Kaushik, G. Toxicity of Hexavalent Chromium in Environment, Health Threats, and Its Bioremediation and Detoxification from Tannery Wastewater for Environmental Safety. In Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety; Saxena, G., Bharagava, R.N., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; Volume 11, pp. 223–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mikhaylina, A.; Ksibe, A.Z.; Scanlan, D.J.; Blindauer, C.A. Bacterial zinc uptake regulator proteins and their regulons. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2018, 46, 983–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, S.; Xiao, C.; Zhou, N.; Chi, R. Speciation, toxicity, microbial remediation and phytoremediation of soil chromium contamination. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 1413–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sahoo, S.; Goli, D. Bioremediation of Lead by a Halophilic Bacteria Bacillus pumilus Isolated from the Mangrove Regions of Karnataka. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2020, 9, 1337–1343. Available online: https://www.ijsr.net/get_count.php?paper_id=ART20204172 (accessed on 14 November 2023).
  23. Alotaibi, B.S.; Khan, M.; Shamim, S. Unraveling the Underlying Heavy Metal Detoxification Mechanisms of Bacillus Species. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. El-Bondkly, A.M.A.; El-Gendy, M.M.A.A. Bioremoval of some heavy metals from aqueous solutions by two different indigenous fungi Aspergillus sp. AHM69 and Penicillium sp. AHM96 isolated from petroleum refining wastewater. Heliyon 2022, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Singh, K.N.; Narzary, D. Diversity and heavy metal tolerance of fungi associated with different coal overburden strata of Tikak Colliery, Assam. Curr. Microbiol. 2023, 80, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Palansooriya, K.N.; Shaheen, S.M.; Chen, S.S.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Hashimoto, Y.; Hou, D.; Balan, N.S.; Rinklebe, J.; Ok, Y.S. Soil amendments for immobilization of potentially toxic elements in contaminated soils: A critical review. Environ. Int. 2020, 134, 105046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Raffa, C.M.; Chiampo, F.; Shanthakumar, S. Remediation of Metal/Metalloid-Polluted Soils: A Short Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rehman, Z.; Junair, M.F.; Ijaz, N.; Khalid, U.; Ijaz, Z. Remediation methods of heavy metal contaminated soils from environmental and geotechnical standpoints. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 867, 161468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, L.; Li, W.; Song, W.; Guo, M. Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 663, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kumar, V.; Rout, C.; Singh, J.; Saharan, Y.; Goyat, R.; Umar, A.; Akbar, S.; Baskoutas, S. A review on the clean-up technologies for heavy metal ions contaminated soil samples. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Su, R.; Wang, Y.; Huang, S.; Chen, R.; Wang, J. Application for Ecological Restoration of Contaminated Soil: Phytoremediation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Al Hasin, A.; Gurman, S.J.; Ashlee, L.M.M.; Smith, T.J.; Gardiner, P.H.E. Remediation of Chromium(VI) by a Methane-Oxidizing Bacterium. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peng, W.; Li, X.; Song, J.; Jiang, W.; Liu, Y.; Fan, W. Bioremediation of cadmium- and zinc-contaminated soil using Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Chemosphere 2018, 197, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Strachel, R.; Wyszkowska, J.; Baćmaga, M. Bioaugmentation of Soil Contaminated with Zinc. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, R.; Fan, X.W.; Li, Y.Z. Efficient removal of a low concentration of Pb(II), Fe(III) and Cu(II) from simulated drinking water by co-immobilization between low-dosages of metal-resistant/adapted fungus Penicillium janthinillum and graphene oxide and activated carbon. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xie, Y.; Bu, H.; Feng, Q.; Wassie, M.; Amee, M.; Jiang, Y.; Bi, Y.; Hu, L.; Chen, L. Identification of Cd-resistant microorganisms from heavy metal-contaminated soil and its potential in promoting the growth and Cd accumulation of bermudagrass. Environ. Res. 2021, 200, 111730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nandy, S.; Andraskar, J.; Lanjewar, K.; Kapley, A. Challenges in bioremediation: From lab to land. In Bioremediation for Environmental Sustainability; Sakena, G., Kumar, V., Shah, M.P., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 23, pp. 561–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hassan, A.; Periathamby, A.; Ahmed, A.; Innocent, O.; Hamid, F.S. Effective bioremediation of heavy metal–contaminated landfill soil through bioaugmentation using consortia of fungi. J. Soils Sediments 2020, 20, 66–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hao, X.; Zhu, J.; Rensing, C.; Liu, Y.; Gao, S.; Chen, W.; Huang, Q.; Liu, Y.R. Recent advances in exploring the heavy metal(loid) resistant microbiome. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 94–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pande, V.; Pandey, S.C.; Sati, D.; Bhatt, P.; Samant, M. Microbial Interventions in Bioremediation of Heavy Metal Contaminants in Agroecosystem. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 824084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Blanck, H.; Wänkberg, S.Å.; Molander, S. Pollution- Induced Community Tolerance—A New Ecotoxicological Tool. In Functional Testing of Aquatic Biota for Estimating Hazards of Chemicals; Cairns, J., Ed.; ASTM STP 988: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1988; pp. 219–231. [Google Scholar]
  42. Government of Romania. Hotărâre privind aprobarea strategiei naționale și a planului național pentru gestionarea siturilor contaminate din România. Constituția României 2015, 108, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  43. Klimek, B.; Niklińska, M. Zinc and Copper Toxicity to Soil Bacteria and Fungi from Zinc Polluted and Unpolluted Soils: A Comparative Study with Different Types of Biolog Plates. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2007, 78, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Santos, I.C.; Hildenbrand, Z.L.; Schug, K.A. Applications of MALDI-TOF MS in environmental microbiology. Analyst 2016, 141, 2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Oladipo, O.G.; Ezeokoli, O.T.; Maboeta, M.S.; Bezuidenhout, J.J.; Tiedt, L.R.; Jordaan, A.; Bezuidenhout, C.C. Tolerance and growth kinetics of bacteria isolated from gold and gemstone mining sites in response to heavy metal concentrations. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 212, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Oladipo, O.G.; Awotoye, O.O.; Olayinka, A.; Bezuidenhout, C.C.; Maboeta, M.S. Heavy metal tolerance traits of filamentous fungi isolated from gold and gemstone mining sites. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yaghoubian, Y.; Siadat, S.A.; Telavat, M.R.M.; Pirdashti, H.; Yaghoubian, I. Bio-removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions by filamentous fungi: Trichoderma spp. and Piriformospora indica. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 7863–7872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khan, I.; Aftab, M.; Shakir, S.; Ali, M.; Qayyum, S.; Rehman, M.U.; Haleem, K.S.; Touseef, I. Mycoremediation of heavy metal (Cd and Cr)–polluted soil through indigenous metallotolerant fungal isolates. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Emenike, C.U.; Agamuthu, P.; Fauziah, S.H. Sustainable remediation of heavy metal polluted soil: A biotechnical interaction with selected bacteria species. J. Geochem. Explor. 2017, 182, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xing, S.; Xu, H.; Shi, G.; Chen, J.; Zeng, L.; Jin, L. A Simple and Sensitive Method for the Amperometric Detection of Trace Chromium(VI) Based on Prussian Blue Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Electroanalysis 2009, 21, 1678–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, Z.; Liang, J.; Ji, X.; Yang, W. Preparation of uniform Au@SiO2 particles by direct silica coating on citrate-capped Au nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2011, 392, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tukur, S.A.; Yusof, N.A.; Hajian, R. Gold Nanoparticles-Modified Screen-Printed Electrode for Determination of Pb(II) Ion Using Linear Sweep Anodic Stripping Voltammetry. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 2780–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ringgit, G.; Siddiquee, S.; Saallah, S.; Mohamad Lal, M.T. A sensitive and rapid determination of zinc ion (Zn(2+)) using electrochemical sensor based on f-MWCNTs/CS/PB/AuE in drinking water. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. European Environment Agency. Industrial Pollution in Europe. 2019. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/industry/industrial-pollution-in-europe (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  55. Saxena, A.M.; Kumar, M.; Chakdar, H.; Anuroopa, N.; Bagyaraj, D.J. Bacillus species in soil as a natural resource for plant health and nutrition. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 128, 1583–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Grady, E.N.; MacDonald, J.; Liu, L.; Richman, A.; Yuan, Z.C. Current knowledge and perspectives of Paenibacillus: A review. Microb. Cell Factories 2016, 15, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kaur, M.; Karnwal, A. Screening of plant growth-promoting attributes bearing endogenous bacteria from abiotic stress resisting high altitude plants. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 11, 100489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Atuchin, V.V.; Asyakina, L.K.; Serazetdinova, Y.R.; Frolova, A.S.; Velichkovich, N.S.; Prosekov, A.Y. Microorganisms for Bioremediation of Soils Contaminated with Heavy Metals. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Joo, J.H.; Hussein, K.A. Heavy Metal Tolerance of Fungi Isolated from Contaminated Soil. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fertil. 2012, 45, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mohammadian, E.; Ahari, A.B.; Arzanlou, M.; Oustan, S.; Khazaei, S.H. Tolerance to heavy metals in filamentous fungi isolated from contaminated mining soils in the Zanjan Province, Iran. Chemosphere 2017, 185, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liaquat, F.; Munis, M.F.H.; Haroon, U.; Arif, S.; Saqib, S.; Zaman, W.; Khan, A.R.; Shi, J.; Che, S.; Liu, Q. Evaluation of Metal Tolerance of Fungal Strains Isolated from Contaminated Mining Soil of Nanjing, China. Biology 2020, 9, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Imran, M.; Ahmad, I.; Barasubiye, T.; Abulreesh, H.H.; Monjed, M.K.; Elbanna, K. Heavy Metal Tolerance Among Free-living Fungi Isolated from Soil Receiving Long Term Application of Wastewater. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 14, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Finlay, R.D.; Thorn, R.G. The Fungi in Soil. In Modern Soil Microbiology, 3rd ed.; Elsas, J.D., Trevors, J.T., Rosado, A.S., Nannipieri, P., Eds.; CRC Press: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 5, pp. 65–91. [Google Scholar]
  64. Nkongolo, K.K.; Narendrula-Kotha, R. Advances in monitoring soil microbial community dynamic and function. J. Appl. Genet. 2020, 61, 249–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Qi, Q.; Hu, C.; Lin, J.; Wang, X.; Tang, C.; Dai, Z.; Xu, J. Contamination with multiple heavy metals decreases microbial diversity and favors generalists as the keystones in microbial occurrence networks. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 306, 119406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Margesin, R.; Plaza, G.A.; Kasenbacher, S. Characterization of bacterial communities at heavy-metal contaminated sites. Chemosphere 2011, 81, 1583–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Guo, H.; Nasir, M.; Lv, J.; Dai, Y.; Gao, J. Understanding the variation of microbial community in heavy metals contaminated soil using high throughput sequencing. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 144, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ma, S.; Qiao, L.; Liu, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Qiu, Z.; Yu, C. Microbial community succession in soils under long-term heavy metal stress from community diversity-structure to KEGG function pathways. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 113822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Altuğ, G.; Çardak, M.; Türetken, P.S.Ç.; Kalkan, S.; Gürün, S. Antibiotic and Heavy Metal Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Aegean Sea Water and Sediment in Güllük Bay, Turkey. Johns. Matthey Technol. Rev. 2020, 64, 507–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rajapaksha, R.M.C.P. Heavy metal tolerance of culturable bacteria and fungi in a long-term cultivated tropical ultisol. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2011, 47, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zeng, X.Y.; Li, S.W.; Leng, Y.; Kang, X.H. Structural and functional responses of bacterial and fungal communities to multiple heavy metal exposure in arid loess. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 723, 138081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Perelomov, L.V.; Sarkar, B.; Sizova, O.I.; Chilachava, K.B.; Shvikin, A.Y.; Perelomova, I.V.; Atroshchenko, Y.M. Zinc and lead detoxifying abilities of humic substances relevant to environmental bacterial species. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 151, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Muñoz, A.J.; Ruiz, E.; Abriouel, H.; Gálvez, A.; Ezzouhri, L.; Lairini, K.; Espínola, F. Heavy metal tolerance of microorganisms isolated from wastewaters: Identification and evaluation of its potential for biosorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 210, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mwandira, W.; Nakashima, K.; Kawasaki, S.; Arabelo, A.; Banda, K.; Nyyambe, I.; Chirwa, M.; Ito, M.; Sato, T.; Igarashi, T.; et al. Biosorption of Pb (II) and Zn (II) from aqueous solution by Oceanobacillus profundus isolated from an abandoned mine. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Danilova, T.A.; Danilina, G.A.; Adzhieva, A.A.; Vostrova, E.I.; Zhukhovitskii, V.G.; Cheknev, S.B. Inhibitory Effect of Copper and Zinc Ions on the Growth of Streptococcus pyogenes and Escherichia coli Biofilms. Immunol. Microbiol. 2020, 169, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Abdalkader, D.; Al-Saedi, F. Antibacterial Effect of Different Concentrations of Zinc Sulfate on Multidrug Resistant Pathogenic Bacteria. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2020, 11, 282–288. Available online: https://www.sysrevpharm.org/abstract/antibacterial-effect-of-different-concentrations-of-zinc-sulfate-on-multidrug-resistant-pathogenic-bacteria-65702.html (accessed on 14 November 2023).
  77. Chen, Y.; Mi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Li, C.; Ye, L.; Zhang, R.; Shi, J.; Li, Z.; Tian, X.; et al. Impact of ZnSO4 and ZnEDTA applications on wheat Zn biofortification, soil Zn fractions and bacterial community: Significance for public health and agroecological environment. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 176, 104484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kamis, M.; Gouda, G.A.; Nagiub, A.M. Biosynthesis approach of zinc oxide nanoparticles for aqueous phosphorous removal: Physicochemical properties and antibacterial activities. BMC Chem. 2023, 17, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sardella, A.; Marieschi, M.; Mercatali, I.; Zanni, C.; Gorbi, G.; Torelly, A. The relationship between sulfur metabolism and tolerance of hexavalent chromium in Scenedesmus acutus (Spheropleales): Role of ATP sulfurylase. Aquat. Toxicol. 2019, 216, 105320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tiquia-Arashiro, S.M. Lead adsorbtion mechanisms in bacteria as strategies for lead bioremediation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 5437–5444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lensmire, J.M.; Hammer, N.D. Nutrient sulfur acquisition strategies employed by bacterial pathogens. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019, 47, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Prakash, S.; Prasad, R.; Yadav, P.K. Assessing the Tolerance Impact of Fungal Isolates against Lead and Zinc Heavy Metals under Controlled Conditions. Environ. Ecol. 2023, 41, 1369–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chandran, C.S.; Shijith, K.V.; Augusthy, A.R. Study on heavy metal toxicity biomarkers in Aspergillus niger. Int. J. Adv. Pharm. Biol. Chem. 2014, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  84. Tian, D.; Jiang, Z.; Jiang, L.; Su, M.; Feng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, S.; Li, Z.; Hu, S. A new insight into lead (II) tolerance of environmental fungi based on a study of Aspergillus niger and Penicillium oxalicum. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 21, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Long, D.D.; Fu, R.R.; Han, J.R. Tolerance and stress response of sclerotiogenic Aspergillus oryzae G15 to copper and lead. Folia Microbiol. 2017, 62, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gajewska, J.; Floryszak-Wieczorek, J.; Sobieszczuk-Nowicka, E.; Mattoo, A.; Arasimonwicz-Jelonek, M. Fungal and oomycete pathogens and heavy metals: An inglorious couple in the environment. IMA Fungus 2022, 13, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Golubović-Ćurguz, V.; Tabaković-Tošić, M.; Veselinović, M.; Rajković, S. The influence of heavy metals on the growth of pathogenic fungi. For. Ideas 2010, 16, 121–125. [Google Scholar]
  88. Abu-Mejdad, N.M.J.A. Response of some fungal species to the effect of copper, magnesium and zinc under the laboratory condition. Eur. J. Exp. Biol. 2013, 3, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mwangi, E.S.K.; Gatebe, E.G.; Ndung’s, M.W. Effect of selected metal ions on the mycelial growth of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum isolated from soybean field in Rongai, Kenya. Int. J. Chem. Mater. Res. 2014, 2, 116–125. [Google Scholar]
  90. Gai, J.P.; Fan, J.Q.; Zhang, S.B.; Mi, N.N.; Christie, P.; Li, X.L.; Feng, G. Direct effects of soil cadmium on the growth and activity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Rhyzosphere 2018, 7, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Nongmaithem, N.; Roy, A.; Bhattacharya, P.M. Screening of Trichoderma isolates for their potential of biosorption of nickel and cadmium. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Govarthanan, M.; Mythili, R.; Selvankumar, T.; Kamala-Kannan, S.; Kim, H. Myco-phytoremediation of arsenic- and lead-contaminated soils by Helianthus annuus and wood rot fungi, Trichoderma sp. isolated from decayed wood. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 151, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Maldaner, J.; Steffen, G.P.K.; Missio, E.L.; Saldanha, C.W.; de Morais, R.M.; Nicoloso, F.T. Tolerance of Trichoderma isolates to increasing concentrations of heavy metals. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 78, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zapana-Huarache, S.V.; Romero-Sánchez, C.K.; Gonza, A.P.D.; Torres-Huaco, F.D.; Rivera, A.M.L. Chromium (VI) bioremediation potential of filamentous fungi isolated from Peruvian tannery industry effluents. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020, 51, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kumar, V.; Dwivedi, S.K. Hexavalent chromium stress response, reduction capability and bioremediation potential of Trichoderma sp. isolated from electroplating wastewater. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 185, 109734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Capdevila, D.A.; Wang, J.; Giedroc, D.P. Bacterial Strategies to Maintain Zinc Metallostasis at the Host-Pathogen Interface. Minireviews 2016, 291, 20858–20868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Campillo-Cora, C.; González-Feijoo, R.; Arias-Estévez, M.; Fernández-Calviño, D. Influence of soil properties on the development of bacterial community tolerance to Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 113920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Bérard, A.; Capowiez, L.; Mombo, S.; Schreck, E.; Dumat, C.; Deola, F.; Capowiez, Y. Soil microbial respiration and PICT responses to an industrial and historic lead pollution: A field study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 4271–4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Renu; Sarim, K.M.; Sahu, U.; Bhoyar, M.S.; Singh, D.P.; Singh, U.B.; Sahu, A.; Gupta, A.; Mandal, A.; Thakur, J.K.; et al. Augmentation of metal-tolerant bacteria elevates growth and reduces metal toxicity in spinach. Bioremediation J. 2020, 25, 108–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Campillo-Cora, C.; Rodríguez-González, L.; Arias-Estévez, M.; Fernández-Calviño, F.; Soto-Gómez, D. Influence of Soil Properties and Initial Concentration on the Fractionation of Nickel, Zinc, Copper and Lead in Soils Derived from Different Parent Materials. Agronomy 2021, 11, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tansengco, M.; Tejano, J.; Coronado, F.; Gacho, C.; Barcelo, J. Heavy Metal Tolerance and Removal Capacity of Trichoderma species Isolated from Mine Tailings in Itogon, Benguet. Environ. Nat. Resour. J. 2018, 16, 39–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mardiyono, M.; Sajidan, S.; Masykuri, M.; Setyono, P. Bioremediation of Nickel Heavy Metals in Electroplating Industrial Liquid Waste with Bacillus subtilis. Int. Conf. Sci. Appl. Sci. (ICSAS) AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2202, 020084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Heidari, P.; Panico, A. Sorption Mechanism and Optimization Study for the Bioremediation of Pb(II) and Cd(II) Contamination by Two Novel Isolated Strains Q3 and Q5 of Bacillus sp. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Guo, S.; Xiao, C.; Zheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Chi, R. Removal and potential mechanisms of Cr(Ⅵ) contamination in phosphate mining wasteland by isolated Bacillus megatherium PMW-03. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 322, 129062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Khan, M.; Ijaz, M.; Chotana, G.; Murtaza, A.; Malik, G.; Shamim, S. Bacillus altitudinis MT422188: A potential agent for zinc bioremediation. Bioremediation J. 2021, 26, 228–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Arroyo-Herrera, I.; Román-Ponce, B.; Reséndiz-Martínez, A.L.; Estrada-de los Santos, P.; Wang, E.T.; Vásquez-Murrieta, M.S. Heavy-metal resistance mechanisms developed by bacteria from Lerma–Chapala basin. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 1807–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Malkoc, S.; Kurt, H.; Ozbayer, C.; Yagci, E. Mycoremediation of Trichoderma harzianum and Penicillium chrysogenum to Pb Exposure: Effect on Metal Bioaccumulation, Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant System. CRPASE Trans. Appl. Sci. 2021, 7, 2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mohamadhasani, F.; Rahimi, M. Growth response and mycoremediation of heavy metals by fungus Pleurotus sp. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 19947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Wróbel, M.; Sliwakowski, W.; Kowalczyk, P.; Kramkowski, K.; Dobrzynski, J. Bioremediation of Heavy Metals by the Genus Bacillus. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 4974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sevak, P.I.; Pushkar, B.K.; Kapadne, P.N. Lead pollution and bacterial bioremediation: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 4463–4488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Utami, U.; Harianie, L.; Dunyana, N.R.; Romaidi. Lead-resistant bacteria isolated from oil wastewater sample for bioremediation of lead. Water Sci. Technol. 2020, 81, 2244–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Njoku, K.L.; Akinyede, O.R.; Obidi, O.F. Microbial Remediation of Heavy Metals Contaminated Media by Bacillus megaterium and Rhizopus stolonier. Sci. Afr. 2020, 10, e00545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mohapatra, R.K.; Parhi, P.K.; Pandey, S.; Bindhani, B.K.; Thatoi, H.; Panda, C.R. Active and passive biosorption of Pb(II) using live and dead biomass of marine bacterium Bacillus xiamenensis PbRPSD202: Kinetics and isotherm studies. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 247, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Shaw, D.R.; Dussan, J. Mathematical Modelling of Toxic Metal Uptake and Efflux Pump in Metal-Resistant Bacterium Bacillus cereus Isolated From Heavy Crude Oil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 226, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Nanda, M.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, D.K. Multimetal tolerance mechanisms in bacteria: The resistance strategies acquired by bacteria that can be exploited to ‘clean-up’ heavy metal contaminants from water. Aquat. Toxicol. 2019, 212, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Maynaud, G.; Brunel, B.; Yashiro, E.; Mergeay, M.; Cleyet-Marel, J.C.; Le Quéré, A. CadA of Mesorhizobium metallidurans isolated from a zinc-rich mining soil is a PIB-2-type ATPase involved in cadmium and zinc resistance. Res. Microbiol. 2014, 165, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Mishra, S.; Doble, M. Novel chromium tolerant microorganisms: Isolation, characterization and their biosorption capacity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 71, 874–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kayalvizhi, K.; Kathiresan, K. Microbes from wastewater treated mangrove soil and their heavy metal accumulation and Zn solubilization. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 22, 101379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kaur, R.; Kumari, A.; Sharma, G.; Singh, D.; Kaur, R. Biodegradation of endocrine disrupting chemicals benzyl butyl phthalate and dimethyl phthalate by Bacillus marisflavi RR014. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 131, 1274–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Saed, M.; Ilyas, N.; Bibi, F.; Jayachandran, K.; Dattamudi, S.; Elgorban, A.M. Biodegradation of PAHs by Bacillus marsiflavi, genome analysis and its plant growth promoting potential. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 292, 118343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Varghese, E.M.; Sivadas, S.; Suresh, C.; Devikrishna, U.; Vidhya, K.; Akhil, K.P.; Jisha, M.S. Biodegradation of chlorpyrifos by an optimized Bacillus consortium isolated from pesticide-contaminated soils of Kerala, India. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2021, 67, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. García, R.; Campos, J.; Cruz, J.A.; Calderón, M.E.; Raynal, M.E.; Buitrón, G. Biosorption of Cd, Cr, Mn, and Pb from Aqueous Solutions by Bacillus sp. Strains Isolated from Industrial Waste Activate Sludge. TIP Rev. Espec. En Cienc. Químico-Biológicas 2016, 19, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Rizvi, A.; Ahmed, B.; Zaidi, A.; Khan, M.S. Biosorption of heavy metals by dry biomass of metal tolerant bacterial biosorbents: An efficient metal clean-up strategy. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Shylla, L.; Barik, S.K.; Joshi, S.R. Characterization and bioremediation potential of native heavy-metal tolerant bacteria isolated from rat-hole coal mine environment. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 2379–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Wang, N.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, F.; Sun, C.; Li, X.; Zhao, R.; Wang, Y. Characteristics of a Copper-cadmium Tolerant Strain Screened from Tailings and Its Potential in Remediation of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2023, 235, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Chandrangsu, P.; Rensing, C.; Helmann, J.D. Metal homeostasis and resistance in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Baran, M.F.; Düz, Z.; Baran, A.; Keskin, C. Fast and Economical Biosorption of Lead (II) Heavy Metal in Aqueous Solutions by Bacillus licheniformis sp. J. Agric. Nat. 2022, 25, 847–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Jin, Y.; Yu, S.; Teng, C.; Song, T.; Dong, L.; Liang, J.; Bai, X.; Xu, X.; Qu, J. Biosorption characteristic of Alcaligenes sp. BAPb.1 for removal of lead(II) from aqueous solution. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wierzba, S. Biosorption of lead(II), zinc(II) and nickel(II) from industrial wastewater by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Bacillus subtilis. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 2015, 17, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ren, G.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, C.; Gu, H.; Qu, J. Characteristics of Bacillus sp. PZ-1 and its biosorption to Pb(II). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 117, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Qiao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, H.; Luo, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, W. Bioimmobilization of lead by Bacillus subtilis X3 biomass isolated from lead mine soil under promotion of multiple adsorption mechanisms. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019, 6, 181701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Syed, S.; Chinthala, P. Heavy Metal Detoxification by Different Bacillus Species Isolated from Solar Salterns. Scientifica 2015, 2015, 319760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Malanovic, N.; Lohner, K. Gram-positive bacterial cell envelopes: The impact on the activity of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 2016, 1858, 936–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Mathew, B.B.; Biju, V.G.; Beeregowda, K.N. Accumulation of lead (Pb II) metal ions by Bacillus toyonensis SCE1 species, innate to industrial-area ground water and nanoparticle synthesis. Appl. Nanosci. 2019, 9, 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Sharma, R.; Talukdar, D.; Bhardwaj, S.; Jaglan, S.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, R.; Akhtar, M.S.; Beniwal, V.; Umar, A. Bioremediation potential of novel fungal species isolated from wastewater for the removal of lead from liquid medium. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 18, 100757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Palanivel, T.M.; Pracejus, B.; Novo, L.A.B. Bioremediation of copper using indigenous fungi Aspergillus species isolated from an abandoned copper mine soil. Chemosphere 2023, 314, 137688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Biswas, D.; Chourasia, A.; Sasmal, A.; Santra, S.; Panigrahi, S.; Kundu, M.; Sarkar, S.; Ghosh, B.; Ghosh, S.; Sarkar, S. Mycoremediation is a Potential Strategy for Environmental Clean-up of Heavy Metal: A Review. J. Surv. Fish. Sci. 2023, 10, 6316–6327. [Google Scholar]
  138. Tu, C.; Liu, Y.; Wei, J.; Li, L.; Scheckel, K.G.; Luo, Y. Characterization and mechanism of copper biosorption by a highly copper-resistant fungal strain isolated from copper-polluted acidic orchard soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 24965–24974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chen, S.H.; Ng, S.L.; Cheow, Y.L.; Ting, A.S.Y. A novel study based on adaptive metal tolerance behavior in fungi and SEM-EDX analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 334, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Chen, S.H.; Cheow, Y.L.; Ng, S.L.; Ting, A.S.Y. Mechanisms for metal removal established via electron microscopy and spectroscopy: A case study on metal tolerant fungi Penicillium simplicissimum. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 362, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhang, D.; Yin, C.; Abbas, N.; Mao, Z.; Zhang, Y. Multiple heavy metal tolerance and removal by an earthworm gut fungus Trichoderma brevicompactum QYCD-6. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Hlihor, R.M.; Roșsca, M.; Drăgoi, E.N.; Simion, I.M.; Favier, L.; Gavrilescu, M. New insights into the application of fungal biomass for chromium(VI) bioremoval from aqueous solutions using Design of Experiments and Differential Evolution based neural network approaches. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2023, 190, 233–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Mohamed, L.A.; Aniagor, C.O.; Hashem, A. Isotherms and kinetic modelling of mycoremediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated wastewater. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2021, 4, 100192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Chen, S.H.; Cheow, Y.L.; Ng, S.L.; Ting, A.S.Y. Bioaccumulation and Biosorption Activities of Indoor Metal-Tolerant Penicillium simplicissimum for Removal of Toxic Metals. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2020, 14, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Shameer, S. Biosorption of lead, copper and cadmium using the extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) of Bacillus sp., from solar salterns. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Masood, F.; Malik, A. Biosorption of metal ions from aqueous solution and tannery effluent by Bacillus sp. FM1. J. Environ. Sci. Health 2011, 46, 1667–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Arivalagan, P.; Singaraj, D.; Haridass, V.; Kaliannan, T. Removal of cadmium from aqueous solution by batch studies using Bacillus cereus. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 71, 728–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Liaqat, I.; Muhammad, N.; Ara, C.; Hanif, U.; Andleeb, S.; Arshad, M.; Aftab, M.N.; Raza, C.; Mubin, M. Bioremediation of heavy metals polluted environment and decolourization of black liquor using microbial biofilms. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023, 50, 3985–3997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Nandiyanto, A.; Oktiani, R.; Ragadhita, R. How to Read and Interpret FTIR Spectroscope of Organic Material. Indones. J. Sci. Technol. 2019, 4, 97–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Gola, D.; Malik, A.; Namburath, M.; Ahammad, S.Z. Removal of industrial dyes and heavy metals by Beauveria bassiana: FTIR, SEM, TEM and AFM investigations with Pb(II). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 20486–20496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Gupta, B.S.; Jelle, B.J.; Gao, T. In vitro cell composition identification of wood decay fungi by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2022, 9, 201935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Pugazhendhi, A.; Boovaragamoorthy, G.M.; Ranganathan, K.; Naushad, M.; Kaliannan, T. New insight into effective biosorption of lead from aqueous solution using Ralstonia solanacearum: Characterization and mechanism studies. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 1234–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ramaswamy, R.; Ahn, J.; Balasubramaniam, V.M.; Saona, L.R.; Yousef, A.E. Food safety engineering. In Handbook of Farm and Food Machinery Engineering; Kutz, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 91–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the MIC protocol in a 24-well plate.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the MIC protocol in a 24-well plate.
Jox 14 00004 g001
Figure 2. Morphological properties of bacterial isolates: (ag)—microscopical appearance; Gram-stain; ob. 100×; respectively; fungal isolates: (hp)—microscopical appearance; Lactophenol Cotton Blue stain; ob. 40×.
Figure 2. Morphological properties of bacterial isolates: (ag)—microscopical appearance; Gram-stain; ob. 100×; respectively; fungal isolates: (hp)—microscopical appearance; Lactophenol Cotton Blue stain; ob. 40×.
Jox 14 00004 g002
Figure 3. Growth curves of bacterial isolates in Luria-Bertani medium supplemented with 1000 mg/L K2Cr2O7 (A), Pb (NO3)2 (B), and ZnSO4 (C) and growth inhibition (D). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between values.
Figure 3. Growth curves of bacterial isolates in Luria-Bertani medium supplemented with 1000 mg/L K2Cr2O7 (A), Pb (NO3)2 (B), and ZnSO4 (C) and growth inhibition (D). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between values.
Jox 14 00004 g003
Figure 4. Growth curves of fungal isolates in PDB medium supplemented with 1000 mg/L K2Cr2O7 (A), Pb (NO3)2 (B), and ZnSO4 (C) and growth inhibition (D). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between values.
Figure 4. Growth curves of fungal isolates in PDB medium supplemented with 1000 mg/L K2Cr2O7 (A), Pb (NO3)2 (B), and ZnSO4 (C) and growth inhibition (D). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between values.
Jox 14 00004 g004
Figure 5. Tolerance index of the (A) bacterial strains and (B) fungal strains to the concentration of 1000 mg L−1 of K2Cr2O7, Pb(NO3)2, and ZnSO4. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between values.
Figure 5. Tolerance index of the (A) bacterial strains and (B) fungal strains to the concentration of 1000 mg L−1 of K2Cr2O7, Pb(NO3)2, and ZnSO4. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between values.
Jox 14 00004 g005
Figure 6. Biomass dry weight (g) (clustered columns) correlated with removal efficiency (%) (purple and green lines) of Bacillus marisflavi (A) and Trichoderma longibrachiatum (B). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between values.
Figure 6. Biomass dry weight (g) (clustered columns) correlated with removal efficiency (%) (purple and green lines) of Bacillus marisflavi (A) and Trichoderma longibrachiatum (B). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between values.
Jox 14 00004 g006
Table 1. Concentration of Cr, Pb, and Zn (mg/kg dw) in the soil samples collected from the contaminated area.
Table 1. Concentration of Cr, Pb, and Zn (mg/kg dw) in the soil samples collected from the contaminated area.
Metals542 F—D1543 F—D2544 F—D3545 F—D4
Cr (mg/kg dw)170 ± 0.0181.1 ± 0.0280.7 ± 0.0275.5 ± 0.01
Pb (mg/kg dw)<4.0 * ± 0.0141.7 ± 0.09211 ± 0.05<4.0 * ± 0.01
Zn (mg/kg dw)129 ± 0.05403 ± 0.07235 ± 0.05108 ± 0.03
* Quantification limit of the detection method.
Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concentration of the bacterial and fungal strains to Cr, Pb, and Zn in the form of K2Cr2O7, Pb (NO3)2, and ZnSO4.
Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concentration of the bacterial and fungal strains to Cr, Pb, and Zn in the form of K2Cr2O7, Pb (NO3)2, and ZnSO4.
Microbial StrainCr (mg/L)Pb (mg/L)Zn (mg/L)
Solibacillus silvestris600800200
Bacillus megaterium200200200
Bacillus marisflavi800200200
Bacillus cereus200200200
Paenibacillus pabuli200200400
Achromobacter sp.600200600
Bacillus subtilis200200800
Phoma glomerata200400600
Trichoderma citrinoviride6004001000
Fusarium fujikuroi400600600
Geotrichum candidum400600800
Phytophthora sp.6004001000
Hypocrea jecorina80010001000
Trichoderma longibrachiatum800800800
Mucor sp.8006001000
Aspergillus niger6006001000
Table 3. The determination of Cr6+, Pb2+, and Zn2+ concentrations in soil samples using electrochemical sensors and the bioremediation capacity (%) of the bacteria (B. marisflavi) and fungal species (T. longibrachiatum).
Table 3. The determination of Cr6+, Pb2+, and Zn2+ concentrations in soil samples using electrochemical sensors and the bioremediation capacity (%) of the bacteria (B. marisflavi) and fungal species (T. longibrachiatum).
B. marisflaviT. longibrachiatum
Metal Concentration (mM)
ChromiumLeadZincChromiumLeadZinc
Before bioremediation42.21.7164.30837.52.5449.762
After bioremediation39.310.2283.5844.95 1.3203.224
Decrease in metal concentration (%)6.8586.7116.887.548.1166.98
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Firincă, C.; Zamfir, L.-G.; Constantin, M.; Răut, I.; Capră, L.; Popa, D.; Jinga, M.-L.; Baroi, A.M.; Fierăscu, R.C.; Corneli, N.O.; et al. Microbial Removal of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Environments Using Metal-Resistant Indigenous Strains. J. Xenobiot. 2024, 14, 51-78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox14010004

AMA Style

Firincă C, Zamfir L-G, Constantin M, Răut I, Capră L, Popa D, Jinga M-L, Baroi AM, Fierăscu RC, Corneli NO, et al. Microbial Removal of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Environments Using Metal-Resistant Indigenous Strains. Journal of Xenobiotics. 2024; 14(1):51-78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox14010004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Firincă, Cristina, Lucian-Gabriel Zamfir, Mariana Constantin, Iuliana Răut, Luiza Capră, Diana Popa, Maria-Lorena Jinga, Anda Maria Baroi, Radu Claudiu Fierăscu, Nicoleta Olguța Corneli, and et al. 2024. "Microbial Removal of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Environments Using Metal-Resistant Indigenous Strains" Journal of Xenobiotics 14, no. 1: 51-78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox14010004

APA Style

Firincă, C., Zamfir, L. -G., Constantin, M., Răut, I., Capră, L., Popa, D., Jinga, M. -L., Baroi, A. M., Fierăscu, R. C., Corneli, N. O., Postolache, C., Doni, M., Gurban, A. -M., Jecu, L., & Șesan, T. E. (2024). Microbial Removal of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Environments Using Metal-Resistant Indigenous Strains. Journal of Xenobiotics, 14(1), 51-78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox14010004

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop