Spatial Assessment of Jerusalem Artichoke’s Potential as an Energy Crop in the Marginal Land of the Shaanxi Province, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. APSIM Model
2.1.1. Meteorological Conditions
2.1.2. Soil Parameterization
2.2. Method: Multi-Factor Integrated Assessment
- In order to protect farmland and retain sustainability and biodiversity, many land cover types (e.g., farmland, forest land, wetland, and bottomland) were excluded from the original land cover data. All the nature reserves and wildlife reserves were excluded from the land use data of 2018 (supplied by China Multi-period Land Use Land Cover Remote Sensing Monitoring Data Set (CNLUCC)) (Figure 2) [33]. Considering the growth conditions of Jerusalem artichoke and the requirements of urban development, unsuitable land use types, such as waters, construction land, and bare rock land, were excluded. The seven land types (including shrubland, sparse forest land, dense grassland, moderate dense grassland, sparse dense grassland, saline land, and bare land) were investigated for the cultivation of Jerusalem artichoke [34,35].
- The yield data from APSIM were transformed into raster data layers (obtained from 31 sites by ordinary Kriging interpolation algorithm with a spherical semivariogram model based on the soil attribute data) with the same pixel size (100 m) and coordinate system.
- Based on the results of the single factor evaluation, a comprehensive evaluation model was developed using the literature’s criteria and thresholds [7]. The multi-factor integrated analysis results were overlaid on the land use and the yield data layer, from which the suitable and fairly suitable land resources for growing Jerusalem artichoke were obtained.
3. Results
3.1. The Single-Factor Evaluation Results
- Slope and elevation are the most critical factors affecting the plantation of Jerusalem artichoke, because Jerusalem artichoke is most suitable for cultivation in flat terrain and altitudes up to 2500 m above sea level (Figure 3a,b). From the slope data, the mountainous terrain in southern Shaanxi restricted its growth, while the slope conditions in most areas of central and southern Shaanxi were suitable. From the spatial distribution of elevation, except for small parts of northwestern and central Shaanxi, the rest areas are suitable.
- Soil factors mainly include soil organic matter content and the adequate thickness of the soil layer (Figure 3c,d). The major source of nutrients for Jerusalem artichoke growth is soil organic matter, which not only stimulates its growth and development but also improves the soil structure and increases the soil’s capacity to hold water and fertilizer. Regarding the spatial distribution of organic matter content, the suitable areas are mainly located in central and southern Shaanxi. Because of the severe soil erosion, the land resources in northern Shaanxi contain a small amount of soil organic matter.
- 3.
- The temperature conditions included the average annual daily minimum temperature, the average annual daily maximum temperature, and the average annual temperature (Figure 4a–c). The average yearly temperature was the most important factor affecting the yield of Jerusalem artichoke and was close to that of the accumulated temperature (>10.0 °C).
- 4.
- Jerusalem artichoke needs a long period of sunshine, and solar radiation can promote its photosynthesis and help it grow better, thus increasing its yield (Figure 3e). In terms of the spatial distribution of solar radiation, the northern Shaanxi is most suitable for its cultivation; the central, southwestern, and southeastern Shaanxi are more appropriate; and only a few areas in southern Shaanxi have low solar radiation with limited suitability.
- 5.
- Jerusalem artichoke’s growth is less restricted by evaporation (Figure 3f). However, if evaporation levels are too high, plants will perish, while too low evaporation will inhibit plants’ transpiration. From the spatial distribution of evaporation, most areas in central and southern Shaanxi are suitable for the growth of Jerusalem artichoke.
3.2. Multifactor Integrated Assessment Results
3.3. Marginal Land Suitable for Planting Jerusalem Artichoke
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- The results of this study show that the total suitable land resources for Jerusalem artichoke cultivation in the Shaanxi province are 6.13 million ha, including 0.73 million ha of suitable land and 5.40 million ha of fairly suitable land.
- For the suitable land, moderate dense grassland is the most dominant land cover type and accounts for 50.6% of the total area. Dense grassland and shrubland are major land cover types, with proportions of 16.2% and 14.7%, respectively.
- Yulin has 1.05 million ha of land available for Jerusalem artichoke cultivation, accounting for 17.3%. Xi’an, Hanzhong, Baoji, Xianyang, Tongchuan, Weinan, Shangluo, and Ankang also have some suitable land, accounting for 12.9%, 13.9%, 5.17%, 12.7%, 11.2%, 4.76%, 5.20%, and 7.22%, respectively, with the least suitable land in Weinan, which has only 291,881 ha.
- The simulation results showed that the yield of Jerusalem artichoke was best in the city of Yan’an (33,434 to 44,289 kg/ha), and in the north-central region of the Shaanxi province. The yield of Tongchuan, Weinan, Xianyang, and other cities was 30,720 to 41,575 kg/ha. In the southern part of the Shaanxi province, Ankang and Shangluo districts produced between 33,434 to 38,861 kg/ha. In general, the yield in northern Shaanxi is higher than that in southern Shaanxi, which is consistent with the above comprehensive evaluation results of multiple factors.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Idris, M.N.M.; Leduc, S.; Yowargana, P.; Hashim, H.; Kraxner, F. Spatio-temporal assessment of the impact of intensive palm oil-based bioenergy deployment on cross-sectoral energy decarbonization. Appl. Energy 2021, 285, 116460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ingrao, C.; Bacenetti, J.; Bezama, A.; Blok, V.; Goglio, P.; Koukios, E.G.; Lindner, M.; Nemecek, T.; Siracusa, V.; Zabaniotou, A.; et al. The potential roles of bio-economy in the transition to equitable, sustainable, post fossil-carbon societies: Findings from this virtual special issue. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 204, 471–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IRENA. Global Renewables Outlook: Energy Transformation 2050. 2020. Available online: https://irena.org/publications/2020/Apr/Global-Renewables-Outlook-2020 (accessed on 5 December 2021).
- Paixao, S.M.; Alves, L.; Pacheco, R.; Silva, C.M. Evaluation of Jerusalem artichoke as a sustainable energy crop to bioethanol: Energy and CO2 eq emissions modeling for an industrial scenario. Energy 2018, 150, 468–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhuang, D.F.; Jiang, D.; Liu, L.; Huang, Y.H. Assessment of bioenergy potential on marginal land in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Chen, F. Assessment of bioenergy potential on marginal land—A case study in Yuzhong county of Gansu. Renew Energy Resour. 2016, 34, 1079–1085. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, F.; Yang, X.F.; Wang, H.L.; Liu, L.; Meng, X.P. Evaluation of the potential land for biofuel plant development in the Shaanxi Province, China. Geol. J. 2018, 53, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clifton-Brown, J.C.; Stampfl, P.F.; Jones, M.B. Miscanthus biomass production for energy in Europe and its potential contribution to decreasing fossil fuel carbon emissions. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2004, 10, 509–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pulighe, G.; Bonati, G.; Colangeli, M.; Morese, M.M.; Traverso, L.; Lupia, F.; Khawaja, C.; Janssen, R.; Fava, F. Ongoing and emerging issues for sustainable bioenergy production on marginal lands in the Mediterranean regions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 103, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dias, N.S.; Ferreira, J.F.S.; Liu, X.; Suarez, D.L. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus, L.) maintains high inulin, tuber yield, and antioxidant capacity under moderately-saline irrigation waters. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 94, 1009–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.C.; Zhang, J.; Yu, C.W.; Li, Q.; Dong, F.; Wang, G.; Gu, G.D.; Guo, Z.Y. Extraction, degree of polymerization determination and prebiotic effect evaluation of inulin from Jerusalem artichoke. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 121, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.L.; Li, S.; Fu, Y.; Zhuang, D.F. An analysis of the geographic distribution of energy crops and their potential for bioenergy production. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 59, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, N.; Yuan, B.; Sun, J.; Wang, S.A.; Li, F.L. Thermotolerant Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains representing potentials for bioethanol production from Jerusalem artichoke by consolidated bioprocessing. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 95, 1359–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, L. The Potential and Impacts of Biofuel Development for the Five Provinces in Southwest China. Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2011. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Kou, Y.; Lu, S.; Liu, J.; Zhao, C. The review of Helianthus tuberosus L. and its comprehensive utilization as a bioenergy plant rich in oligosaccharide. Chin. Bull. Life Sci. 2014, 26, 451–457. [Google Scholar]
- Lv, S.Q.; Wang, R.X.; Xiao, Y.M.; Li, F.C.; Mu, Y.W.; Lu, Y.; Gao, W.T.; Yang, B.; Kou, Y.X.; Zeng, J.; et al. Growth, yield formation, and inulin performance of a non-food energy crop, Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.), in a semi-arid area of China. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 134, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keating, B.A.; Robertson, M.J.; Muchow, R.C.; Huth, N.I. Modelling sugarcane production systems I. Development and performance of the sugarcane module. Field Crops Res. 1999, 61, 253–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singels, A. Crop models. In Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology; More, P.H., Botha, F.C., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 541–577. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, J.W.; Hoogenboom, G.; Porter, C.H.; Boote, K.J.; Batchelor, W.D.; Hunt, L.A.; Wilkens, P.W.; Singh, U.; Gijsman, A.J.; Ritchie, J.T. The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 18, 235–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, M.R.; Singels, A. Refining the Canegro model for improved simulation of climate change impacts on sugarcane. Eur. J. Agron. 2018, 100, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Keating, B.A.; Carberry, P.S.; Hammer, G.L.; Probert, M.E.; Robertson, M.J.; Holzworth, D.; Huth, N.I.; Hargreaves, J.N.G.; Meinke, H.; Hochman, Z.; et al. An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 18, 267–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Holzworth, D.P.; Huth, N.I.; Devoil, P.G.; Zurcher, E.J.; Herrmann, N.I.; McLean, G.; Chenu, K.; van Oosterom, E.J.; Snow, V.; Murphy, C.; et al. APSIM—Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 62, 327–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holzworth, D.; Huth, N.I.; Fainges, J.; Brown, H.; Zurcher, E.; Cichota, R.; Verrall, S.; Herrmann, N.I.; Zheng, B.; Snow, V. APSIM Next Generation: Overcoming challenges in modernising a farming systems model. Environ. Model. Softw. 2018, 103, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The National Meteorological Scientific Data Sharing Service Platform. Available online: http://data.cma.cn/ (accessed on 4 April 2021).
- Rossini, F.; Provenzano, M.E.; Kuzmanović, L.; Ruggeri, R. Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.): A Versatile and Sustainable Crop for Renewable Energy Production in Europe. Agronomy 2019, 9, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liava, V.; Karkanis, A.; Danalatos, N.; Tsiropoulos, N. Cultivation Practices, Adaptability and Phytochemical Composition of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.): A Weed with Economic Value. Agronomy 2021, 11, 914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojeda, J.J.; Volenec, J.J.; Brouder, S.M.; Caviglia, O.P.; Agnusdei, M.G. Evaluation of Agricultural Production Systems Simulator as yield predictor of Panicum virgatum and Miscanthus × giganteus in several US environments. Glob. Chang. Biol. Bioenergy 2017, 9, 796–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojeda, J.J.; Volenec, J.J.; Brouder, S.M.; Caviglia, O.P.; Agnusdei, M.G. Modelling stover and grain yields, and subsurface artificial drainage from long-term corn rotations using APSIM. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 195, 154–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojeda, J.J.; Rezaei, E.E.; Remenyi, T.A.; Webb, M.A.; Webber, H.A.; Kamali, B.; Harris, R.M.B.; Brown, J.N.; Kidd, D.B.; Mohammed, C.L.; et al. Effects of soil and climate data aggregation simulated potato yield and irrigation water requirement. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 710, 135589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baldini, M.; Danuso, F.; Monti, A.; Amaducci, M.; Stevanato, P.; De Mastro, G. Chicory and Jerusalem artichoke productivity in different areas of Italy, in relation to water availability and time of harvest. Ital. J. Agron. 2006, 1, 291–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-survey/soil-maps-and-databases/harmonized-world-soil-database-v12/en/ (accessed on 5 December 2021).
- Dias, H.B.; Sentelhas, P.C. Sugarcane yield gap analysis in Brazil—A multi-model approach for determining magnitudes and causes. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 637, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, S.; Li, R.; Yan, C.; Wu, S.; China Multi-period Land Use Land Cover Remote Sensing Monitoring Data Set (CNLUCC). Data Registration and Publishing System of the Resource and Environmental Science Data Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [DB/OL] 2018. Available online: https://www.resdc.cn/ (accessed on 5 December 2021).
- Robertson, M.J.; Carberry, P.S.; Huth, N.I.; Turpin, J.E.; Probert, M.E.; Poulton, P.L.; Bell, M.; Wright, G.C.; Yeates, S.J.; Brinsmead, R.B. Simulation of growth and development of diverse legume species in APSIM. Crop Pasture Sci. 2002, 53, 429–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.Y.; Zhang, Z.X.; Zhuang, D.F.; Zhang, Z.X.; Deng, X.Z. Space pattern analysis of recently land use change in China. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 2002, 32, 1031–1041. [Google Scholar]
- Shangzhou District People’s Government. Available online: http://www.shangzhou.gov.cn/ (accessed on 5 December 2021).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yin, F.; Jin, Z.; Zhu, J.; Liu, L.; Zhao, D. Spatial Assessment of Jerusalem Artichoke’s Potential as an Energy Crop in the Marginal Land of the Shaanxi Province, China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413576
Yin F, Jin Z, Zhu J, Liu L, Zhao D. Spatial Assessment of Jerusalem Artichoke’s Potential as an Energy Crop in the Marginal Land of the Shaanxi Province, China. Sustainability. 2021; 13(24):13576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413576
Chicago/Turabian StyleYin, Fang, Ziyue Jin, Jiazheng Zhu, Lei Liu, and Danyun Zhao. 2021. "Spatial Assessment of Jerusalem Artichoke’s Potential as an Energy Crop in the Marginal Land of the Shaanxi Province, China" Sustainability 13, no. 24: 13576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413576
APA StyleYin, F., Jin, Z., Zhu, J., Liu, L., & Zhao, D. (2021). Spatial Assessment of Jerusalem Artichoke’s Potential as an Energy Crop in the Marginal Land of the Shaanxi Province, China. Sustainability, 13(24), 13576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413576