Urban Resource Assessment, Management, and Planning Tools for Land, Ecosystems, Urban Climate, Water, and Materials—A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- -
- Which application areas can be distinguished, or do overlaps exist?
- -
- Which are the primary tool capabilities that can be distinguished?
- -
- What technology readiness levels do the tools have?
- -
- Which tools are freely available, and which are commercially available?
- -
- At which scale does the tool assess, operate, and plan?
- -
- Do the tools allow for monodirectional or bidirectional communication with stakeholders?
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Classification
3.2. Review of Each Field of Application
3.2.1. Land Use, Surface Use, and Urban Green Tools
3.2.2. Water Tools
3.2.3. Material/Waste Tools
3.3. Overarching Tools
4. Discussion
4.1. Communal Assessment and Information Viewer (Web) Tools
4.2. Communal Monitoring and Management (Web) Tools
4.3. Communal Planning and Simulation (Web) Tools
4.4. Identified Research and Tool Development Gaps
4.5. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bai, X.; Surveyer, A.; Elmqvist, T.; Gatzweiler, F.W.; Güneralp, B.; Parnell, S.; Prieur-Richard, A.H.; Shrivastava, P.; Siri, J.G.; Stafford-Smith, M.; et al. Defining and advancing a systems approach for sustainable cities. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2016, 23, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Punter, J. Developing Urban Design as Public Policy: Best Practice Principles for Design Review and Development Management. J. Urban Des. 2007, 12, 167–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostafavi, N.; Farzinmoghadam, M.; Hoque, S. A framework for integrated urban metabolism analysis tool (IUMAT). Build. Environ. 2014, 82, 702–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frantzeskaki, N.; McPhearson, T.; Collier, M.; Kendal, D.; Bulkeley, H.; Dumitru, A.; Walsh, C.; Noble, K.; Van Wyk, E.; Ordóñez, C.; et al. Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Climate Change Adaptation: Linking Science, Policy, and Practice Communities for Evidence-Based Decemberision-Making. BioScience 2019, 69, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dar, M.U.D.; Shah, A.I.; Bhat, S.A.; Kumar, R.; Huisingh, D.; Kaur, R. Blue Green infrastructure as a tool for sustainable urban development. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 318, 128474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voskamp, I.; de Luca, C.; Polo-Ballinas, M.B.; Hulsman, H.; Brolsma, R. Nature-Based Solutions Tools for Planning Urban Climate Adaptation: State of the Art. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BBSR. Wie Geodaten und Digitale Tools die Raumplanung Verändern/How do Geographic Data and Digital Tools Change Urban Planning. 2020. Available online: https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/startseite/topmeldungen/2020-izr-geoinformationen.html (accessed on 22 September 2021).
- Barron, C. Ökologischer Planungsatlas, Stadt Mannheim, Fachbereich Geoinformation und Stadtplanung. 2022. Available online: https://www.mannheim.de/de/stadt-gestalten/planungskonzepte/oekologischer-planungsatlas (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Barron, C. Stadtklimaanalyse 2010, Stadt Mannheim, Fachbereich Geoinformation und Stadtplanung. 2022. Available online: https://www.mannheim.de/de/stadt-gestalten/planungskonzepte/stadtklimaatlas/stadtklimaanalyse-2010 (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- KomMonitor. Kommunales Monitoring zur Raumentwicklung/Kommunal Monitoring for Urban Development. 2021. Available online: https://kommonitor.de/ (accessed on 16 November 2021).
- NRW. Siedlungsflächenmonitoring Nordrhein-Westfalen—Ansatzpunkte für die Konzeptionelle Weiterentwicklung des Siedlungsflächenmonitorings Nordrhein-Westfalen, ILS—Institut für Landes- und Stadtentwicklungsforschung gGbmH. 2015. Available online: https://www.wirtschaft.nrw/sites/default/files/asset/document/20160621_sfm_nrw_-_abschlussbericht_weiterentwicklung.pdf (accessed on 16 November 2021).
- Smarticipate. Opening Up the Smart City—Smarticipate Open to All. 2021. Available online: https://www.smarticipate.eu/ (accessed on 30 November 2021).
- Geoportal Karlsruhe. Geoportal Karlsruhe. 2021. Available online: https://www.karlsruhe.de/b3/bauen/geodaten.de (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- MULNV. Umgebungslärm in NRW, Ministerium für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft, Natur- und Verbraucherschutz (MULNV) des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. 2021. Available online: www.Umgebungslaerm-kartierung.nrw.de (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Boris.NRW. Aktuelle Informationen zum Immobilienmarkt in NRW. 2021. Available online: https://www.boris.nrw.de/borisplus/?lang=de (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- ELWAS-WEB. Über ELWAS-WEB, Ministerium für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft, Natur- und Verbraucherschutz (MULNV) des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. 2021. Available online: https://www.elwasweb.nrw.de/elwas-web/index.xhtml;jsessionid=0161C9700D2DF6C7B6FB1093DE4B07A6?nested=false (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- NYC. NYC Energy & Water Performance Map. 2021. Available online: https://energy.cusp.nyu.edu/#/ (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- SolareStadt. Solarpotenzialkataster, Tetraeder.Solar. 2021. Available online: https://www.solare-stadt.de/home/Solarpotenzialkataster (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Geoportal Karlsruhe. Solarkataster Karlsruhe, Geoportal Karlsruhe, Stadt Karlsruhe, Karlsruher Energie- und Klimaagentur. 2021. Available online: https://geoportal.karlsruhe.de/solarkataster/ (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Solarpotential-KreisKa. Potenzial (Gemeindeebene). 2021. Available online: https://www.solarpotenzial-kreiska.de/ (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Klärle. Gründachkataster (GREEN-AREA), Umweltplanung. 2022. Available online: https://www.klaerle.de/leistungsbild/kommunalplanung/gruendachkataster/ (accessed on 8 March 2022).
- Hanau. Gründach- und Entsiegelungskataster. 2021. Available online: https://www.gpm-webgis-13.de/geoapp/kataster/hanau/ (accessed on 19 November 2021).
- Marburg. Gründachkataster Marburg. 2021. Available online: https://www.gpm-webgis-10.de/geoapp/gruendachkataster/marburg/ (accessed on 19 November 2021).
- Otero Peña, D.; Perrotti, D.; Mohareb, E. Advancing urban metabolism studies through GIS data: Resource flows, open space networks, and vulnerable communities in Mexico City. J. Ind. Ecol. 2022, 110, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geoportal Herne. Geoportal. 2021. Available online: https://www.herne.de/Stadt-und-Leben/Stadtfakten/Geoportal/index-2.html (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- openGeodata.NRW. openGeodata.NRW, Ministerium für Information und Technik, Nordrhein-Westfalen. 2021. Available online: https://www.opengeodata.nrw.de/produkte/ (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Jain, G.; Espey, J. Lessons from nine urban areas using data to drive local sustainable development. NPJ Urban Sustain. 2022, 2, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ataman, C.; Tuncer, B. Urban Interventions and Participation Tools in Urban Design Processes: A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis (1995–2021). Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 76, 103462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saikia, P.; Beane, G.; Garriga, R.G.; Avello, P.; Ellis, L.; Fisher, S.; Leten, J.; Ruiz-Apilánez, I.; Shouler, M.; Ward, R.; et al. City Water Resilience Framework: A governance based planning tool to enhance urban water resilience. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 77, 103497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herbert, A.; Arthur, S.; Chillingworth, G. Thermal modelling of large scale exploitation of ground source energy in urban aquifers as a resource management tool. Appl. Energy 2013, 109, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mainzer, K.; Killinger, S.; McKenna, R.; Fichtner, W. Assessment of rooftop photovoltaic potentials at the urban level using publicly available geodata and image recognition techniques. Sol. Energy 2017, 155, 561–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oldenburg, O.; Murshed, S.M.; Kremers, E.; Mainzer, K.; Koch, A. Model-Based Analysis of Urban Energy Systems (On the Basis of a City’s Energy Master Plan), Emergence: Complexity and Organization. 2015. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298072977_Model-based_analysis_of_urban_energy_systems_On_the_basis_of_a_city%27s_energy_master_plan (accessed on 11 May 2022).
- McKenna, R.; Bertsch, V.; Mainzer, K.; Fichtner, W. Combining local preferences with multi-criteria decision analysis and linear optimization to develop feasible energy concepts in small communities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2018, 268, 1092–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mainzer, K.; McKenna, R.; Fichtner, W. Übertragbare Methoden zur Bestimmung und räumlichen Verortung des Wärmebedarfs von Wohngebäuden in Städten. In Proceedings of the BauSIM2018-7 Deutsch-Österreichische IBPSA-Konferenz: Tagungsband. Hrsg.: P. von Both, Karlsruhe, Germany, 26–28 September 2018; pp. 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mainzer, K.; Schlund, D.; Killinger, S.; McKenna, R.; Fichtner, W. Rooftop PV Potential Estimations: Automated Orthographic Satellite Image Recognition Based on Publicly Available Data. In Proceedings of the 32nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (EU PVSEC), München, Germany, 20–24 June 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, X.; Abbes, D.; Francois, B. Development of a tool for urban microgrid optimal energy planning and management. Simul. Model. Pr. Theory 2018, 89, 64–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrari, S.; Zagarella, F.; Caputo, P.; Bonomolo, M. Assessment of tools for urban energy planning. Energy 2019, 176, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akrofi, M.M.; Okitasari, M. Integrating solar energy considerations into urban planning for low carbon cities: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art. Urban Gov. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oregi, X.; Roth, E.; Alsema, E.; van Ginkel, M.; Struik, D. Use of ICT Tools for Integration of Energy in Urban Planning Projects. Energy Procedia 2015, 83, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Comi, A.; Schiraldi, M.M.; Buttarazzi, B. Smart urban freight transport: Tools for planning and optimising delivery operations. Simul. Model. Pr. Theory 2018, 88, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boeing, G.; Higgs, C.; Liu, S.; Giles-Corti, B.; Sallis, J.F.; Cerin, E.; Lowe, M.; Adlakha, D.; Hinckson, E.; Moudon, A.V.; et al. Using open data and open-source software to develop spatial indicators of urban design and transport features for achieving healthy and sustainable cities. Lancet Glob. Health 2022, 10, e907–e918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magalhães, I.; Santos, E. Evaluating the potential of mobility plans for achieving sustainable urban development. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2022, 43, 100743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Lotto, R.; Greco, A.; Moretti, M.; Pietra, C.; Venco, E.M. Collaborative Soft Mobility Planning for University Cities: The Case of Pavia. Transp. Res. Procedia 2022, 60, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navarro-Ligero, M.L.; Valenzuela-Montes, L.M. A Tool for the Assessment of Urban Mobility Scenarios in Climate Change Mitigation: An Application to the Granada's LRT Project. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 19, 364–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ProPolis. ProPolis. 2021. Available online: https://www.climate-service-center.de/science/projects/detail/084205/index.php.en (accessed on 23 December 2021).
- ProPolis. ProPolis—Basics for the Operationalization of PALM-4U—Practicability and Continuation Strategy. 2021. Available online: https://uc2-propolis.de/index.php.en (accessed on 23 December 2021).
- Bürgerportal Radolfzell. Metadaten Bürgerportal Stadt Radolfzell am Bodensee. 2022. Available online: https://metadaten.geoportal-bw.de/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/c5deee40-5ccd-4fe7-c3f5-7b8f5d4c8981 (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- Bürgerportal Radolfzell. Bürgerportal Stadt Radolfzell am Bodensee. 2022. Available online: https://radolfzell.aed-synergis.de/WebOffice_flex/synserver?project=Radolfzell_flex&client=flex (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- ESRI/ArcGIS. 3D Public Survey—Bürgerbeteiligung in 3D. 2022. Available online: https://arcgis.esri.de/3d-public-survey-buergerbeteiligung-in-3d/ (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- OpenDataBrandenburg. Open Data in Brandenburg—Suchen, Visualisieren, Herunterladen, Nutzen. 2022. Available online: https://brandenburg-smartgeohub.opendata.arcgis.com/ (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- Demoanwendung. Demoanwendung—Unsere Stadt Wird Lebenswerter, ESRI Deutschland GmbH. 2022. Available online: https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/b4ba15fd1bc1452fa7bc3e9b5a1cf44f (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- Demoanwendung. Demoanwendung—Bürgerbeteiligungs-Dashboard, ESRI Deutschland GmbH. 2022. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/5fed8207Decemberc4d27832ec2d80e987b90 (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- DIPAS. Digitale Bürgerbeteiligung Weiter Denken—Das Erste Medienbruchfreie Digitale System zur Bürgerbeteiligung Online und vor Ort. 2022. Available online: https://www.dipas.org/ (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- Geobranchen. Bürgerbeteiligung—Das Digitale Partizipationssystem DIPAS Wird Veröffentlicht: Hamburger Software Erweitert Möglichkeiten der Bürgerbeteiligung. 2022. Available online: https://www.geobranchen.de/mediathek/geonews/item/hamburger-software-erweitert-m%C3%B6glichkeiten-der-b%C3%BCrgerbeteiligung (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- IÖB. CITY_CODE: Digitale Bürgerpartizipation & Co-Desig. 2022. Available online: https://www.ioeb-inNovemberationsplattform.at/challenges/detail/wien-gemeinsam-gestalten-instrumentenbox-fuer-partizipation/detailIdea/city-code-digitale-buergerpartizipation-co-design/ (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- IÖB. CITY_CODE—Eine Instrumentenbox für Digitale Bürgerpartizipation & Co-Design in der Stadtentwicklung. 2022. Available online: https://www.ioeb-inNovemberationsplattform.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Media_Library/Uploads/Challenge/Idea/Documents/CITY_CODE.pdf (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- Volk, R.; Naber, E.; Lützkendorf, T.; Böhnke, D.; Mörmann, K.; Schultmann, F.; Norra, S. Identifikation und Bewertung von Entsiegelungspotenzialen als Beitrag zur nachhaltigen Quartiersentwicklung—Zwischenergebnisse aus NaMaRes. In Proceedings of the Flächennutzungsmonitoring XIII: Flächenpolitik-Konzepte-Analysen Tools, Dresden, Germany, 28–29 June 2021; Volume 79, pp. 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naber, E.; Volk, R. Schultmann. Namares—A surface inventory and intervention assessment model for urban resource management. Sustainability, 2022; under review. [Google Scholar]
- PALM. PALM-4U Components. 2021. Available online: https://palm.muk.uni-hanNovember.de/trac/wiki/palm4u (accessed on 19 November 2021).
- PALM. The PALM Model System. 2021. Available online: https://palm.muk.uni-hanNovember.de/trac (accessed on 3 December 2021).
- ENVI-met. ENVI-Met Software, Envi-Met GmbH. 2021. Available online: https://www.envi-met.com/de/software/ (accessed on 19 November 2021).
- DWD. INKAS—Informationsportal KlimaAnpassung in Städten, Deutscher Wetterdienst. 2021. Available online: https://www.dwd.de/DE/forschung/klima_umwelt/klimawirk/stadtpl/inkas/inkas_node.html (accessed on 19 November 2021).
- MeinGrün App. MeinGrün App. 2021. Available online: https://app.meingruen.org/#/ (accessed on 19 November 2021).
- Raum&Energie. Bund-/Länder-Dialog Fläche: Flächenrechner 2.0—Wegweiser für Kommunen zum Ziel „30-Hektar-X“. 2021. Available online: https://www.raum-energie.de/veranstaltungen/details/news/bund-laender-dialog-flaeche-flaechenrechner-20-wegweiser-fuer-kommunen-zum-ziel-30-hektar-x/ (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- UBA. Kommunaler Flächenrechner, Umweltbundesamt, Germany. 2021. Available online: https://gis.uba.de/maps/resources/apps/flaechenrechner/index.html?lang=de (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- Google. Labs: Tree Canopy—Explore Tree Canopy from City Scale to Street Level. 2021. Available online: https://insights.sustainability.google/labs/treecanopy (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Google. How 5 Cities Plan to Use Tree Canopy to Fight Climate Change. 2021. Available online: https://blog.google/products/maps/how-5-cities-plan-use-tree-canopy-fight-climate-change/ (accessed on 3 December 2021).
- Sieker. Flood Warning System HydroWebView, Sieker the Stormwater Experts. 2021. Available online: https://www.sieker.de/en/software/software-gis/product/flood-warning-system-hydrowebview-46.html (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- DWA. Wasserbilanz-Expert (WABILA)—Standortgerechte Regenwasserbewirtschaftung, Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e. V. (DWA). 2021. Available online: https://de.dwa.de/de/Wasserbilanz.html (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- EPA. Storm Water Management Model—User’s Manual Version 5.1, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2015. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-02/documents/epaswmm5_1_manual_master_8-2-15.pdf (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- EPA. Storm Water Management Model (SWMM), United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2021. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/water-research/storm-water-management-model-swmm (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- Hörnschemeyer, B.; Henrichs, M.; Uhl, M. SWMM-UrbanEVA: A Model for the Evapotranspiration of Urban Vegetation. Water 2021, 13, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DWA. Versickerungs-Expert, Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e. V. (DWA). 2021. Available online: https://de.dwa.de/de/versickerungs-expert.html (accessed on 3 December 2021).
- DWA. Planungshilfe Abfluss-Steuerung (PASST), Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e. V. (DWA). 2021. Available online: https://de.dwa.de/de/Planungshilfe_Abfluss-Steuerung.html (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- IFAK. SAmpSONS2—Visualisierung und Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung von Ressourcen-Orientierten Sanitärsystemen, Ifak—Institut für Automation und Kommunikation e. V. 2021. Available online: https://www.ifak.eu/de/produkte/sampsons (accessed on 3 December 2021).
- TransMIT. Webviewer—Oberflächige (Not-)Wasserwege. 2021. Available online: https://webmap.ikg.uni-hanNovember.de/TransMiTWebViewer/ (accessed on 3 December 2021).
- Ramboll. GreenScenario. 2021. Available online: https://de.ramboll.com/-/media/eaac28970c9c40cc815ca60f920a9fba.pdf (accessed on 3 December 2021).
- ECOPLAN. ECOPLAN Tools. University of Antwerp. 2021. Available online: https://www.uantwerpen.be/en/research-groups/ecoplan/ecoplan-tools/ (accessed on 3 December 2021).
- ECOPLAN. ECOPLAN Scenario Evaluator—ECOPLAN Simulation Tool. University of Antwerp. 2021. Available online: https://www.uantwerpen.be/en/research-groups/ecoplan/ecoplan-tools/scenario-evaluator/ (accessed on 3 December 2021).
- FAO. Collect Earth Online, FAO and SERVIR Global (NASA and USAID Initiative, Version: Prod-2021-12-2). 2022. Available online: https://collect.earth/ (accessed on 25 February 2022).
- GCC. Green Infrastructure Toolkit, Georgetown Climate Center. 2022. Available online: https://www.georgetownclimate.org/adaptation/toolkits/green-infrastructure-toolkit/introduction.html?full (accessed on 25 February 2022).
- IUFC. Urban Forest Management Plan Toolkit, Inland Urban Forest Council. 2022. Available online: https://ufmptoolkit.net/ (accessed on 8 March 2022).
- USDA. I-Tree Eco, USDA Forest Service. 2022. Available online: https://www.itreetools.org/tools/i-tree-eco (accessed on 8 March 2022).
- The Nature Conservancy. Healthy Trees, Healthy Cities. 2022. Available online: https://healthytreeshealthycitiesapp.org/ (accessed on 8 March 2022).
- PlanIT GEO. Treeplotter TM Software Suite. 2022. Available online: https://planitgeo.com/treeplotter/ (accessed on 8 March 2022).
- USDA. Urban Tree Canopy Assessment: A Community’s Path to Understanding and Managing the Urban Forest, U.S. In Department of Agriculture.; 2022. Available online: https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/fs_media/fs_document/Urban%20Tree%20Canopy%20paper.pdf (accessed on 8 March 2022).
- WRI México.Toolkit for Community Participation in Pocket Parks. 2016. Available online: https://wriciudades.org/research/publication/toolkit-community-participation-pocket-parks (accessed on 8 March 2022).
- Vibrant Cities Lab. Community Assessment & Goal-Setting Tool. 2022. Available online: https://www.vibrantcitieslab.com/assessment-tool/ (accessed on 25 February 2022).
- USGS. Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES), USGS Rocky Mountain Geographic Science Center & Colorado State University. 2018. Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/centers/geosciences-and-environmental-change-science-center/science/social-values-ecosystem (accessed on 14 March 2022).
- UNDP. Learning for Nature, United Nations Development Programme. 2022. Available online: https://www.learningfornature.org/en/ (accessed on 14 March 2022).
- WRI. Aqueduct Floods BETA (Aqueduct Global Flood Analyzer), World Resources Institute (WRI). 2022. Available online: http://floods.wri.org/ (accessed on 25 February 2022).
- Gray, E.; Ozment, S.; Altamirano, J.C.; Feltran-Barbieri, R.; Morales, G. Green-Gray Assessment: How to Assess the Costs and Benefits of Green Infrastructure for Water Supply Systems, Working Paper, World Resources Institute (WRI). 2019. Available online: https://files.wri.org/d8/s3fs-public/green-gray-assessment.pdf (accessed on 25 February 2022).
- King’s College London. WaterWorld, King’s College London & AmbioTEK. 2022. Available online: http://www.policysupport.org/waterworld (accessed on 14 March 2022).
- King’s College London. Co$ting Nature, King’s College London & AmbioTEK & UNEP-WCMC. 2022. Available online: http://www.policysupport.org/costingnature (accessed on 14 March 2022).
- The Nature Conservancy. Water Funds Toolbox, The Nature Conservancy. 2022. Available online: https://waterfundstoolbox.org/ (accessed on 14 March 2022).
- USDA. I-Tree HydroPlus, USDA Forest Service. 2022. Available online: https://www.itreetools.org/tools/hydro (accessed on 15 March 2022).
- UNEP. Biodiversity A–Z, UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). 2022. Available online: https://www.biodiversitya-z.org/ (accessed on 25 February 2022).
- WRI. Forest Monitoring Designed for Action, Global Forest Watch, World Resources Institute (WRI). 2022. Available online: https://globalforestwatch.org/ (accessed on 25 February 2022).
- Complete Streets. Complete Streets Policy Implementation Resources, Smart Growth America—Improving Lives by Improving Communities, National Complete Streets Coalition. 2022. Available online: https://smartgrowthamerica.org/tag/complete-streets-policy-implementation-resources/ (accessed on 25 February 2022).
- Stanford. InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs), Stanford University. 2022. Available online: https://naturalcapitalproject.stanford.edu/software/invest (accessed on 15 March 2022).
- The Atlas. The Atlas. 2022. Available online: https://the-atlas.com/ (accessed on 15 March 2022).
- IUCM. Restoration Opportunities Assessment Methodology (ROAM), IUCN & World Resources Institute. 2016. Available online: https://www.iucn.org/resources/conservation-tools/more/restoration-opportunities-assessment-methodology (accessed on 15 March 2022).
- USDA. Stewardship Mapping and Assessment Project (STEW-MAP). 2022. Available online: https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/STEW-MAP/ (accessed on 16 March 2022).
- The Mersey Forest. GI Valuation Tool Kit (GI-Val), The Mersey Forest More from Trees. 2022. Available online: https://www.merseyforest.org.uk/services/gi-val/ (accessed on 16 March 2022).
- EKN. Green Infrastructure Valuation Toolkit (GI-Val), Ecosystems Knowledge Network. 2022. Available online: https://ecosystemsknowledge.net/green-infrastructure-valuation-toolkit-gi-val (accessed on 16 March 2022).
- NWS. Forecast of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration (FRET) for Short Canopy Vegetation, National Weather Service (NWS), National Oceanic and Atmosphereric Administration. 2014. Available online: https://nws.weather.gov/products/viewItem.php?selrow=245 (accessed on 17 March 2022).
- Hamouda, B.; Zaccaria, D.; Bali, K.; Snyder, R.L.; Ventura, F. Evaluation of Forecast Reference Evapotranspiration for Different Microclimate Regions in California to Enable Prospective Irrigation Scheduling. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2022, 148, 04021061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CWP. Making Your Community Forest-Friendly: A Worksheet for Review of Municipal Codes and Ordinances, Center for Watershed Protection. 2018. Available online: https://owl.cwp.org/mdocs-posts/making-your-community-forest-friendly-a-worksheet-for-review-of-municipal-codes-and-ordinances/ (accessed on 15 March 2022).
- Mostafavi, N.; Farzinmoghadam, M.; Hoque, S.; Weil, B. Integrated Urban Metabolism Analysis Tool (IUMAT). Urban Policy Res. 2013, 32, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostafavi, N.; Farzinmoghadam, M.; Hoque, S. Urban residential energy consumption modeling in the Integrated Urban Metabolism Analysis Tool (IUMAT). Build. Environ. 2017, 114, 429–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahrokni, H.; Lazarevic, D.; Brandt, N. Smart Urban Metabolism: Towards a Real-Time Understanding of the Energy and Material Flows of a City and Its Citizens. J. Urban Technol. 2015, 22, 65–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenpass. Greenpass Toolbox. 2021. Available online: https://greenpass.io/de/toolboxx/ (accessed on 10 December 2021).
- Greenpass. Greenpass Product Book Assessment. 2022. Available online: https://greenpass.io/de/info-material-gpas/ (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- Patterson, M.S.; Mccallum, K. Collect Earth, Openforis. 2020. Available online: https://openforis.org/tools/collect-earth/ (accessed on 1 August 2021).
- WRI. Resource Watch, World Resources Institute. 2022. Available online: https://resourcewatch.org/data/explore (accessed on 16 March 2022).
- ICLEI. U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 2022. Available online: https://icleiusa.org/us-community-protocol/ (accessed on 16 March 2022).
- Treetect. Treetect. 2022. Available online: https://github.com/krakchris/TreeTect (accessed on 16 March 2022).
- Klärle, M.; Langendörfer, U.; Lanig, S.; Popp, F. GREEN-AREA—Intelligentes Gründachkataster auf der Basis von GIS-Daten. ZfV-Z. Geodäsie Geoinf. Landmanag. 2017, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klärle, M.; Langendörfer, U.; GREEN-AREA—Intelligentes Gründachkataster auf der Basis von GIS-Daten. Transforming Cities 3/2018, pp. 74–77. 2018. Available online: https://www.transforming-cities.de/ausgabe-3-2018-urbane-raeume-und-flaechen/ (accessed on 17 March 2022).
- DWA. DWA-Software—Wasserbilanz-Expert—Handbuch, Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e. V. (DWA). 2021. Available online: https://de.dwa.de/files/_media/content/05_PUBLIKATIONEN/Software/WABILA-Expert/WasserbilanzExpert_Handbuch_2018_11_01.pdf (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- DWA. Simulator zur Visualisierung von Stoffströmen, Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e. V. (DWA). 2021. Available online: https://de.dwa.de/de/sampsons2.html (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- Vystavna, Y.; Schmidt, S.; Diadin, D.; Rossi, P.M.; Vergeles, Y.; Erostate, M.; Yermakovych, I.; Yakovlev, V.; Knöller, K.; Vadillo, I. Multi-tracing of recharge seasonality and contamination in groundwater: A tool for urban water resource management. Water Res. 2019, 161, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulligan, M. WaterWorld: A self-parameterising, physically based model for application in data-poor but problem-rich environments globally. Hydrol. Res. 2013, 44, 748–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montalto, F.A.; Bartrand, T.A.; Waldman, A.M.; Travaline, K.A.; Loomis, C.H.; McAfee, C.; Geldi, J.M.; Riggall, G.J.; Boles, L.M. Decentralised green infrastructure: The importance of stakeholder behaviour in determining spatial and temporal outcomes. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2013, 9, 1187–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz-Carpena, R.; Ritter, A.; Fox, G. Comparison of empirical and mechanistic equations for vegetative filter strip pesticide mitigation in long-term environmental exposure assessments. Water Res. 2019, 165, 114983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chrysoulakis, N. The BRIDGE approach. In Understanding Urban Metabolism, 1st ed.; Chrysoulakis, N., Anselmo de Castro, E., Moors, E.J., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2014; 9p. [Google Scholar]
- Hodges, N.; González, A.; Mitraka, Z. Decemberision support tools for urban planning. In Understanding Urban Metabolism, 1st ed.; Chrysoulakis, N., Anselmo de Castro, E., Moors, E.J., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2014; 5p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moors, E.J.; Grimmond, C.S.B.; Veldhuizen, A.; Järvi, L.; van der Bolt, F. Urban water balance and hydrology models to support sustainable urban planning. In Understanding Urban Metabolism, 1st ed.; Chrysoulakis, N., Anselmo de Castro, E., Moors, E.J., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2014; 11p. [Google Scholar]
- Derrible, S.; Cheah, L.; Arora, M.; Yeow, L.W. Urban Metabolism. In Urban Informatics; Shi, W., Goodchild, M.F., Batty, M., Kwan, M.-P., Zhang, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Chrysoulakis, N.; Anselmo de Castro, E.; Moors, E.J. (Eds.) Understanding Urban Metabolism—A Tool for Urban Planning, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, L.; Li, H.; Dong, L.; Fang, K.; Ren, J.; Geng, Y.; Fujii, M.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, N.; Liu, Z. Eco-benefits assessment on urban industrial symbiosis based on material flows analysis and emergy evaluation approach: A case of Liuzhou city, China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 119, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhu, X. GIS and Urban Mining, Special Issue Wealth from Waste: Urban Metal Resources and Industrial Ecology. Resources 2014, 3, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badach, J.; Voordeckers, D.; Nyka, L.; Van Acker, M. A framework for Air Quality Management Zones - Useful GIS-based tool for urban planning: Case studies in Antwerp and Gdańsk. Build. Environ. 2020, 174, 106743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BRIDGE. About BRIDGE Project. 2011. Available online: https://www.bridge-fp7.eu/ (accessed on 17 March 2017).
- Rosado, L.; Niza, S.; Ferrao, P. A Material Flow Accounting Case Study of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area using the Urban Metabolism Analyst Model. J. Ind. Ecol. 2014, 18, 84–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, D.; You, F.; Zhao, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, T.; Cao, A.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J. Input, stocks and output flows of urban residential building system in Beijing city, China from 1949 to 2008. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2010, 54, 1177–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alfonso Piña, W.H.A.; Pardo Martínez, C.I. Urban material flow analysis: An approach for Bogotá, Colombia. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 42, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Z.; Hu, D.; Zhang, F.; Huang, G.; Xiao, Q. An integrated material metabolism model for stocks of urban road system in Beijing, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 470-471, 883–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Beeton, R.; Halog, A.; Sigler, T. Evaluating urban sustainability potential based on material flow analysis of inputs and outputs: A case study in Jinchang City, China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 110, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, P.P.-J.; Wiedenback, A.; Tobey, M.; Wu, Y.; Quan, S.J.; Chauhan, Y.; Wu, J. Material Based Urban Modeling: An Approach to Integrate Smart Materials in a Near-Zero Community Design. Energy Procedia 2017, 105, 3765–3771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeller, V.; Towa, E.; Degrez, M.; Achten, W.M. Urban waste flows and their potential for a circular economy model at city-region level. Waste Manag. 2018, 83, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- DWD. Stadtklimamodell PALM-4U, Deutscher Wetterdienst. 2021. Available online: https://www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/palm4u/palm4u.html (accessed on 19 November 2021).
- MOSAIK2. MOSAIK-2—Second Phase of The Project “Model-based city planning and application in climate change”. 2021. Available online: https://palm.muk.uni-hanNovember.de/mosaik/ (accessed on 3 December 2021).
- Gusson, C.D.S.; Duarte, D.H. Effects of Built Density and Urban Morphology on Urban Microclimate—Calibration of the Model ENVI-met V4 for the Subtropical Sao Paulo, Brazil. Procedia Eng. 2016, 169, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epelde, L.; Mendizabal, M.; Gutiérrez, L.; Artetxe, A.; Garbisu, C.; Feliu, E. Quantification of the environmental effectiveness of nature-based solutions for increasing the resilience of cities under climate change. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 67, 127433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DWD. INKAS-NRW—Wirkungsanalyse, Deutscher Wetterdienst. 2022. Available online: https://www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/inkas/inkas_nrw_wirkungsanalyse.html (accessed on 17 March 2022).
- LANUV. Fachinformationssystem Klimaanpassung, Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz, Nordrhein-Westphalen. 2022. Available online: https://www.klimaanpassung-karte.nrw.de/ (accessed on 17 March 2022).
- Da Silva, A.O.; Souza Fernandes, R.A. Smart governance based on multipurpose territorial cadastre and geographic information system: An analysis of geoinformation, transparency and collaborative participation for Brazilian capitals. Land Use Policy 2020, 97, 104752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voskamp, I.M.; Spiller, M.; Stremke, S.; Bregt, A.K.; Vreugdenhil, C.; Rijnaarts, H.H. Space-time information analysis for resource-conscious urban planning and design: A stakeholder based identification of urban metabolism data gaps. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 128, 516–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Teng, M.; Wu, C.; Zhou, Z.; Lord, E.; Zheng, Z. Multipurpose greenway planning for changing cities: A framework integrating priorities and a least-cost path model. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 103, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Böhnke, D.; Volk, R.; Lützkendorf, T.; Naber, E.; Krehl, A.; Becker, R.; Norra, S. Grünbestände in privaten Innenhöfen und deren Ökosystemleistungen im Stadtquartier—Erkenntnisse einer quartiersweiten Erhebung in Karlsruhe. In Proceedings of the Flächennutzungsmonitoring XIII: Flächenpolitik-Konzepte-Analysen Tools, Dresden, Germany, 28–29 June 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dembski, F.; Wössner, U.; Letzgus, M.; Ruddat, M.; Yamu, C. Urban Digital Twins for Smart Cities and Citizens: The Case Study of Herrenberg, Germany. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schebek, L.; Lützkendorf, T.; Uhl, M. Handreichung zur Typologie von Indikatoren Sowie Ihrer Anwendung in Planungsprozessen und Projekten zur Nachhaltigen Quartiersentwicklung, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), FONA. 2022. Available online: https://ressourceneffiziente-stadtquartiere.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Handreichung_Indikatorik_01-2022_final.pdf (accessed on 23 March 2022).
- Schinkel, U.; Becker, N.; Trapp, M.; Speck, M. Assessing the Contribution of Innovative Technologies to Sustainable Development for Planning and Decision-Making Processes: A Set of Indicators to Describe the Performance of Sustainable Urban Infrastructures (ISI). Sustainability 2022, 14, 1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DIN SPEC 91468 „Leitfaden für ressourceneffiziente Stadtquartiere“/Guideline for Resource-Efficient Urban Districts. Available online: https://www.din.de/de/forschung-und-inNovemberation/din-spec/alle-geschaeftsplaene/wdc-beuth:din21:346552454 (accessed on 23 March 2022).
Keywords | Sciencedirect | Scopus |
---|---|---|
urban management tool | 141,317 | 11,431 |
urban land use tool | 66,234 | 2230 |
urban water management tool | 79,426 | 3158 |
urban green management tool | 48,760 | 789 |
urban materials management tool | 83,452 | 669 |
urban ecology management tool | 23,703 | 468 |
urban resource management tool | 64,376 | 2674 |
Application | Capability | Technology Readiness Level (TRL) | Availability | Scale | Directionality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tool (Source, Developer/Operator) | Application | Capability | Type | Availability | Scale | Dir. | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Land/surface/space use | Urban Green Space | Urban climate | Water | Materials/Waste | Assessment/Viewer | Monitoring/Management | Planning/Simulation | TRL3/4: Scientific concept/code | TRL5/7: Standalone software | TRL5/7: Web-based tool/app | TRL8/9: Qualified tool | None | Open source | Commercial use | Building | City block | District | City | One or two | |
namares [57,58] | x | (x) | (x) | x | x | x | x | x | x | - | x | - | x | - | - | x | x | x | x | 1 |
PALM4U [59,60] | x | x | x | x | x | - | - | x | x | x | - | x | - | x | - | (x) | x | x | x | 1 |
ENVI-met ** [61] | x | x | x | (x) | - | - | - | x | - | x | - | x | - | - | x | (x) | x | x | x | 1 |
INKAS [62] | - | (x) | x | (x) | - | - | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | x | 1 |
MeinGrün App [63] | - | x | (x) | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | 1 | |
Kommunaler Flächenrechner 2.0 [64,65] | x | - | - | - | - | x | x | x | - | - | x | ? | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | 1 |
GREEN-AREA [21] | x | x | - | - | - | x | - | x | - | - | x | x | - | - | x | x | x | x | x | 1 |
Labs: Tree Canopy [66,67] | - | x | - | - | - | x | (x) | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | x | 1 |
HydroWebView/STORM [68] | x | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | ? | ? | ? | 1 |
WABILA-Expert [69] | - | x | x | x | (x *) | - | - | x | - | x | - | ? | - | - | x | - | x | x | x | 1 |
Storm Water Management Model [70,71] | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | x | - | x | - | ? | - | x | - | - | x | x | x | 1 |
SWMM-UrbanEVA [72] | - | x | x | x | - | - | - | x | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | - | 1 |
Versickerungs-Expert [73] | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | x | - | x | - | ? | - | - | x | - | x | - | - | 1 |
Planungshilfe Abfluss-Steuerung (PASST) [74] | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | x | - | - | ? | - | x | - | - | x | x | x | 1 |
SAmpSONS2 [75] | - | - | x | x | - | - | x | - | x | - | ? | - | x | - | - | x | - | - | 1 | |
TransMiT WebViewer [76] | - | - | - | x | - | x | - | x | x | - | x | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | - | 1 |
Greenscenario [77] | - | x | x | x | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | - | - | - | x | ? | x | x | - | 1 |
ECOPLAN Tools ** [78,79] | x | x | x | x | x | x | (x) | x | x | - | - | - | x | - | - | ? | x | x | ? | 1 |
CityCode/DATA4CITY [55,56] | - | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | 2 |
City Water Resilience Framework (CWRF) [29] | - | - | - | x | - | x | - | x | x | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | - | x | 1 |
Siedlungsflächenmonitoring web GIS [11] | x | - | - | - | - | x | x | - | - | - | x | ? | (x) 1 | - | - | - | - | - | x | 1 |
Collect Earth [80] | x | x | - | - | - | x | x | - | - | x | x | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | x | 1 |
Green Infrastructure Toolkit [81] | x | x | - | x | - | x | x | x | - | x | x | x | - | x | - | - | - | x | x | 1 |
Urban Forest Management Plan Toolkit [82] | x | x | - | - | - | - | - | x | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | x | x | 1 |
i-Tree Eco [83] | x | x | x | x | - | x | x | x | - | x | - | x | - | x | - | x | x | x | x | 2 |
Healthy Trees, Healthy Cities [84] | - | x | - | - | - | x | x | - | - | x | ? | x | - | x | x | x | x | 2 | ||
Treeplotter [85] | - | x | - | - | - | x | x | x | - | - | x | ? | - | - | x | x | x | x | x | 2 |
Urban Tree Canopy Assessment [86] | x | x | - | - | - | x | x | x | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | x | 1 | |
Toolkit for Community Participation in Pocket Parks [87] | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | x | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | x | x | - | - | 2 |
Community Assessment & Goal-Setting Tool [88] | - | x | - | - | - | x | - | x | x | - | x | - | - | x | - | - | - | x | x | 1 |
SolVES [89] | x | x | - | x | - | x | - | x | - | x | - | x | - | x | - | - | - | x | x | 1 |
Learning for Nature [90] | x | x | x | x | - | - | x | x | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | 1 |
Aqueduct Global Flood Analyzer [91] | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | - | - | x | x | - | x | - | - | - | x | x | 1 |
Green-Gray Assessment Guide [92] | - | x | - | x | - | x | - | x | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | 1 |
WaterWorld [93] | x | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | - | - | x | ? | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | 1 |
Co$ting Nature [94] | x | x | - | - | - | - | x | x | - | - | x | ? | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | 2 |
Water Funds Toolbox [95] | x | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | x | - | - | ? | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | 1 |
i-Tree Hydro Plus [96] | x | x | - | x | - | x | x | x | - | x | - | x | - | x | - | - | - | x | x | 2 |
Biodiversity A-Z [97] | x | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | 1 |
Global Forest Watch [98] | x | x | - | - | - | x | x | - | - | x | x | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | 1 |
Complete Streets [99] | - | x | - | - | - | - | - | x | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | x | x | 1 |
InVEST [100] | x | x | x | x | - | x | x | x | - | x | - | ? | - | x | - | - | x | x | x | 2 |
The Atlas [101] | x | x | x | x | x | - | x | x | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | x | 1 |
ROAM [102] | x | x | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | - | x | 1 |
Stewardship Mapping and Assessment Project (STEW-MAP) [103] | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | x | 1 |
GI Valuation Tool Kit (GI-Val) [104,105] | x | x | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | - | - | - | x | - | (x) | x | x | x | 1 |
Forecast reference evapotranspiration tool (FRET) [106,107] | x | - | - | x | - | - | - | x | x | x | - | ? | - | x | - | - | - | x | x | 1 |
Worksheet for Review of Municipal Codes and Ordinances [108] | x | x | - | - | - | - | x | x | x | - | - | - | - | x | - | - | - | - | x | 1 |
Integrated Urban Metabolism Analysis Tool (IUMAT) [3,109,110] | x | - | - | - | x | x | - | x | x | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | x | x | 1 |
Smart Urban Metabolism (SUM) [111] | - | - | - | - | x | x | - | - | x | - | - | - | x | - | - | x | x | x | - | 1 |
Greenpass [112,113] | - | - | x | - | - | x | - | - | - | x | - | (x) | - | - | x | x | x | x | - | 1 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Volk, R.; Rambhia, M.; Naber, E.; Schultmann, F. Urban Resource Assessment, Management, and Planning Tools for Land, Ecosystems, Urban Climate, Water, and Materials—A Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127203
Volk R, Rambhia M, Naber E, Schultmann F. Urban Resource Assessment, Management, and Planning Tools for Land, Ecosystems, Urban Climate, Water, and Materials—A Review. Sustainability. 2022; 14(12):7203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127203
Chicago/Turabian StyleVolk, Rebekka, Mihir Rambhia, Elias Naber, and Frank Schultmann. 2022. "Urban Resource Assessment, Management, and Planning Tools for Land, Ecosystems, Urban Climate, Water, and Materials—A Review" Sustainability 14, no. 12: 7203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127203