Next Article in Journal
Evaluating Nature-Based Tourism Destination Attractiveness with a Fuzzy-AHP Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Differential Physiological Traits, Ion Homeostasis and Cane Yield of Sub-Tropical Sugarcane Varieties in Response to Long-Term Salinity Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Socioeconomic Determinants of Households’ Vulnerability to Drought in Western Cape, South Africa
Previous Article in Special Issue
Root System Architecture and Symbiotic Parameters of Summer Mung Bean (Vigna Radiata) under Different Conservation Agriculture Practices
 
 
Correction published on 1 November 2024, see Sustainability 2024, 16(21), 9521.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens to Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) Improves Both Its Seedling Quality and Field Performance

1
Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur 176062, India
2
Department of Horticulture, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125001, India
3
Department of Chemistry, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra 136118, India
4
Natural and Medical Sciences Research Center, University of Nizwa, Nizwam 616, Oman
5
Kikugawa Research Station, Yokohama Ueki, 2265, Kamo, Kikugawa City 439-0031, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(13), 7583; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137583
Submission received: 16 May 2022 / Revised: 18 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 June 2022 / Published: 22 June 2022 / Corrected: 1 November 2024

Abstract

:
Inoculating cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) plants with bio-control agents and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can considerably improve seedling quality, growth, yield, and yield-related parameters over time. An experiment was conducted to evaluate the bio-fertilizer efficiency of a bio-control agent (Trichoderma viride) alone or in combination with PGPR (Pseudomonas fluorescens). Accordingly, various seedling quality and yield parameters were studied, and the results suggested that all the co-inoculation treatments displayed beneficial effects. Still, the combination of Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens showed the maximum increment in all the parameters considered, i.e., seedling emergence, seedling height, stem diameter, leaf area, root length, seedling vigour index, seedling fresh weight, seedling dry weight, total chlorophyll content, plant height at 30 DAT, plant height at 60 DAT, leaf numbers, leaf area index, root length, root dry weight, number of non-wrapping leaves, number of wrapping leaves, head weight, head diameter, and head yield. The findings appear to offer a viable bio-control technique for crop protection as bio-fertilizers bundled in a single formulation.

1. Introduction

Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) is one of the foremost crops belonging to the Cruciferae family [1]. It is used for culinary purposes and has various medicinal and nutritional properties. It contains significant amounts of dietary fibre, phenols, carotenoids, carbohydrates, flavonoids, glucosinolates, anthocyanin, minerals, protein, and vitamins with excellent caloric value [2,3]. This crop is frequently consumed for salad purposes, juiced, in stir-fry, as boiled leaves, and as a fermented food. However, the production through excessive use of synthetic fertilizers cannot be overpowered [4]. This is because the plants take up only a partial amount of nutrients due to low fertilizer-use efficiency in the soil, and the fertilizers that remain lead to environmental pollution [5]. Additionally, these synthetic fertilizers contain heavy metals that cannot degrade easily, acting as a persistent pollutant for the environment, further causing eutrophication of water sources [6].
To limit the use of synthetic fertilizers, organic inputs are needed, which can upsurge the nutrient availability in soil and show significant effects on the health and horticultural traits of plants [7]. Amongst all the organic inputs, bio-fertilizers can serve as a substitute for synthetic fertilizers. Bio-fertilizers are comprised of living microorganisms that facilitate faster colonization and augment nutrient availability to encourage plant growth [8]. Various vegetable crops, such as cabbage, broccoli, etc., were benefited from the application of bio-fertilizers, including strains of Azospirillium, Azotobacter, Bacillus, and Rhizobium, to the soil and as a seed treatment [9]. They enhanced the yields of organic systems through rapid breakdown of organic matter, increased nutrients’ availability, and improved soil characteristics through the release of metabolites stimulating the growth. Bio-fertilizers can help improve soil structure by increasing the microbial biomass that ultimately augments crop production and productivity. These bio-fertilizers can convert essential nutrient elements through biological processes to make them available for the plants’ consumption [10]. Apart from this, numerous studies validated that a plant treated with bio-agents performed better in early growth stages and showed other improved traits, such as the breakdown of dormancy, improvised synchronization of seedling emergence, vigour index, growth indices, vegetative growth, early flowering, etc. [11].
As a heavy feeder crop, cabbage uptakes nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium to a greater extent [12]. Most suitable bio-agent species belong to either bacterial or fungal groups [13,14]. Amongst various bacterial bio-agents, Pseudomonas spp. is the most frequently distributed gram-negative bacteria that can colonize in different environmental conditions [15]. Due to its versatile metabolic capacity and widespread occurrence, this genus is mainly used as a crop inoculant that enhances the plant’s growth-promoting activities in numerous ways [16]. Pseudomonas fluorescens may help stimulate the growth-related aspects of cabbage, particularly encouraging the rapid growth of seedlings and minimizing the transplanting shock [17]. Additionally, in a sequence of fungal bio-agents, Trichoderma is frequently used because of its fast growth, well-built spore production, ease in isolation, and secretion of enzymes related to cell wall degradation [18]. These traits may improve nutrient solubilization, nutrient uptake capacity, root growth, plant health, enhanced microbial activity, and degradation of xeno-biotic compounds and polysaccharides, rendering them efficient bio-control agents [19]. Essentially, the efficacy of these bio-fertilizers depends on their counts, soil type, and environmental conditions [20]. To level up the sub-optimal activity of microorganisms, bio-fertilizers are multiplied artificially to accelerate the biological activity that ultimately increases the plant’s nutrient availability [21]. Hence, our study was conducted to demonstrate the beneficial effects of T. viride and P. fluorescens on cabbage seedlings’ morphological quality and field performance so as to present them as potential bio-fertilizers for yield enhancement.

2. Material and Methods

From mid-November 2018 to mid-November 2019, field experiments were conducted at Ranchi University, at 23°22′18″ N longitude, 85°19′27″ E latitude, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The seeds were pre-treated with P. fluorescens in a 100 mL solution containing 1 mL P. fluorescens inoculum (IMTECH, Mohali, India) at 37 °C for 5 h on a rotary shaker. The seeds were then air-dried and used for subsequent analysis. The four-week-old seedlings were maintained under relative humidity of 80% at 30 °C. Nutrient-broth medium made in sterilized water and incubated for 48 h at 32 °C was used to create P. fluorescens inoculum [22]. The healthy seedlings were transplanted in pots with the dimensions of 3.0 m × 2.7 m × 45 cm, with 45 cm spacing between rows and within each plot.
Sterilized inoculum sand–soil mixture was added to each pot, 1 kg to the control and 100 g less to other treatments, such as the Trichoderma soil inoculum (SriRam fertilizer, Kota, India). The soil dilution plate method was used to create the inoculum on potato dextrose agar medium, and T. viride was identified manually. The plates were incubated for four days at a temperature of 30 °C. Wheat bran, sawdust, and water were added to the inoculum in a 3:1:1 ratio. In the experiment, seeds treated with 5% T. viride were referred to as T1, seeds treated with 5% P. fluorescens were referred to as T2, and seeds treated with 5% T. viride and 5% P. fluorescens were referred to as T3. All the experiments were conducted with at least three biological replicates.
To ensure the best possible results, seedling characteristics, such as seedling emergence percentage, days to 2-true-leaf stage, seedling height, stem diameter, leaf area, days to transplant, root length, seedling vigour index, seedling fresh weight, seedling dry weight, and total chlorophyll content, were all measured just before transplanting. A portable leaf chlorophyll meter SPAD-502 (Konica Minolta, Osaka, Japan) was used to determine the quantity of chlorophyll across the entire leaf’s surface [23]. Seedling height (cm), stem diameter (mm), and root length (cm) were determined from 20 randomly chosen seedlings at the time of final germination count. A leaf area meter (LI-3100, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) was used to measure the leaf area (cm2) [24]. Seedling dry weight (g) was recorded by keeping the seedlings in a hot-air oven for 48 h at 60 °C. Based on the seed germination and seedling dry weight data, the seedling vigour index was calculated as the seedling germination (%) × seedling dry weight (g) [25].
The crop received a homogenous dose of fertilizers at rates of 130 kg N, 80 kg P2O5, and 80 kg K2O per hectare. The appropriate cultural and plant protection measures were executed uniformly in all plots as needed. Ten randomly selected plants from each plot were observed in the main field. Data were collected for the following variables: days to head initiation, days to head maturity, head weight, and head yield.

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were conducted using the statistical tool INDOSAT version 8.0. The mean of each individual year and the pooled mean were determined. We compared the treatment averages using the least significant difference (LSD) test at the 0.05 level of significance [26].

3. Results

3.1. Effect on Seedlings’ Morphological Quality Characteristics

The percentage of seedling emergence was found to be the greatest (93.13%) for those with the T3 treatment, in which seed treatment was done with 5% Trichoderma viride and with 5% Pseudomonas fluorescens before transplanting. Seedling emergence increased by 8% in T1, 10% in T2, and 12% in T3 compared with the control treatment; days to 2-true-leaf stage increased by 22% in the control, 2% in T1, and 32% in T2 compared with the T3 treatment (Figure 1). The combined efficiency of the 5% Trichoderma viride and the 5% Pseudomonas fluorescens treatments before transplanting was further confirmed with the increased seedling height, the greatest being 39% in T1, then 29% in T2, and 56% in T3 compared with the control treatment (Figure 1). The stem diameter of the seedling was also increased by 50% in T1, 28% in T2, and 57% in T3 compared with the control treatment (Figure 1). Further, the leaf area of the seedlings increased by 89% in T1, 72% in T2, and 98% in T3 (Figure 1). The number of days it took to transplant the seedlings by the seed treatment with 5% Trichoderma viride was decreased by 31% in T2, 9% in control, and 1% in T3 compared with T1 (Figure 1).
The root length of the seedlings also showed a probable increase by 25% in the control, 94% in T1, and 168% in T3 compared with T2 (Figure 2). However, the most significant variations were recorded in the seedling vigour index, seedling fresh weight, and the seedling dry weight, where T3 remarkably increased by 89%, 143%, and 171%, respectively; T1 increased by 72%, 128%, and 157%, respectively; and T2 increased by 10%, 64%, and 64%, respectively, compared with the control (Figure 2). In addition, T3 also significantly enhanced chlorophyll content with an increase of 26%, followed by 17% in T1, and 1% in the control, which was very close to T2 (Figure 1). The days taken to establish the seedlings were increased by 27% in the control, 61% in T2, and <1% in T3 compared with T1, which fewer days to establish the seedlings of cabbage (Figure 2). All these observations pointed toward the fact that although all the treatments produced significant results, T3 was found to be the most efficient in enhancing the seedlings’ morphological characteristics (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

3.2. Effect on the Field Performance of Cabbage

The plant height at 30 DAT and 60 DAT increased by 30% and 16%, respectively, in T3; by 25% and 13%, respectively, in T1; and by 4% and 2%, respectively, in T2 compared with the control (Figure 3). The number of leaves increased by 31% in T3, 26% in T1, and 4% in T2 compared with the control; the leaf area index increased by 38% in T3, 16% in T1, and 5% in T2 compared with the control (Figure 2). Root length increased by 31% in T3, 18% in T1, and 1% in the control, and root dry weight increased by 33% in T3, 24% in T1, and 4% in the control (Figure 3). The number of non-wrapping leaves and wrapping leaves exhibited a maximum increase in T3 of 18% and 35%, respectively, followed by T1 with 14% and 30%, respectively, and then T2 with 1% and 5%, respectively (Figure 3).
In the case of days to head initiation and days to head harvesting, there were nominal increments of 5% and 10%, respectively, in the control; 4% and 8%, respectively, in T2; and 1% and 3%, respectively, in T1 (Figure 4). Further, the increase of 40%, 24%, and 8% was observed in the head weights of T3, T1, and T2, respectively, when subjected to treatments (Figure 4). In addition to the different upgraded head features of the cabbage plant, the inoculation with 5% Trichoderma viride and seed treatment with 5% Pseudomonas fluorescens also caused an improvement in head diameter, which increased by 23% after treatment in T3, 13% in T1, and a minimum increase of <0.07% in the control (Figure 4). However, it is worth mentioning that the head compactness also showed significant variations and exhibited only a nominal decrease of 65% in T2, 47% in the control, and 23% in T1 compared with the effects of 5% Trichoderma viride and seed treatment with 5% Pseudomonas fluorescens inoculations (Figure 4). Furthermore, the head yield also increased by 37%, 24%, and 9% after the treatment of the plants in T3, T1, and T2, respectively (Figure 4). Therefore, as far as the yield and yield-related characteristics of cabbage are concerned, the dual combination of 5% Trichoderma viride and seed treatment with 5% Pseudomonas fluorescens was found to be more effective than both their separate applications and no application.

3.3. Correlations among the Traits

In total, there were 325 correlations, of which only 140 were significant with p < 0.1. The days to 2-true-leaf stage was positively correlated with days to transplant (0.995), days to establishment (0.968), and head compactness (0.959), and it was negatively correlated with total chlorophyll content (−0.953) and root dry weight (−0.972) (Figure 5). Seedling height showed a positive correlation with stem diameter (0.981), leaf area (0.967), fresh seedling weight (0.971), seedling dry weight (0.95), and head yield (0.952) (Figure 5). Stem diameter was found to be positively correlated with leaf area (0.965), seedling fresh weight (0.999), seedling dry weight (0.99), and head yield (0.959), and it was negatively correlated with days to head initiation (−0.957) (Figure 5). However, leaf area and days to transplant showed positive correlation with seedling fresh weight (0.952) and days to establishment (0.981) respectively (Figure 4). Root length was positively correlated with total chlorophyll content (0.987), leaf area index (0.958), root length (0.992), root dry weight (0.986), number of non-wrapping leaves (0.952), and head diameter (0.989), while it was negatively correlated with head compactness (−0.99) (Figure 5).
In the case of seedling vigour index, positive correlation was observed for seedling dry weight (0.969), total chlorophyll content (0.984), plant height at 30 DAT (0.999), plant height at 60 DAT (1), leaf numbers (0.999), root length (0.976), root dry weight (0.975), number of non-wrapping leaves (1), number of wrapping leaves (0.999), head weight (0.969), head diameter (0.976), and head yield (0.978) (Figure 5). In contrast, negative correlation was observed for days to head initiation (−0.989) and days to harvesting (−0.994) (Figure 5). Seedling fresh weight was positively correlated with seedling dry weight (0.996), plant height at 30 DAT (0.958), leaf numbers (0.956), number of wrapping leaves (0.958), and head yield (0.963) but was negatively correlated with days to head initiation (−0.963) and days to harvesting (−0.952) (Figure 5). Likewise, seedling dry weight was positively correlated with plant height at 30 DAT (0.977), plant height at 60 DAT (0.968), leaf numbers (0.976), number of non-wrapping leaves (0.962), number of wrapping leaves (0.978), and head yield (0.968) but was negatively correlated with days to head initiation (−0.973) and days to harvesting (−0.967) (Figure 5).
Furthermore, total chlorophyll content showed a direct correlation with plant height at 30 DAT (0.975), plant height at 60 DAT (0.986), leaf numbers (0.976), leaf area index (0.952), root length (0.998), root dry weight (0.997), number of non-wrapping leaves (0.989), number of wrapping leaves (0.974), head weight (0.968), head diameter (0.997), and head yield (0.963), whereas it showed an inverse correlation with days to head initiation (−0.973), days to harvesting (−0.983), and head compactness (−0.972) (Figure 5). Plant height at 30 DAT was positively correlated with plant height at 60 DAT (0. 998), leaf numbers (1), root length (0.966), root dry weight (0.965), number of non-wrapping leaves (0.997), number of wrapping leaves (1), head weight (0.964), head diameter (0.967), and head yield (0.977) but was negatively correlated with days to head initiation (−0.988) and days to harvesting (−0.992) (Figure 5).
In the same way, days to harvesting exhibited a negative correlation with head weight (−0.99), head diameter (−0.985), and head yield (−0.994) (Figure 5). Finally, head weight showed a positive correlation with head diameter (0.981) and head yield (0.997), whereas head diameter showed a negative correlation with head compactness (−0.965) and a positive correlation with head yield (0.972) (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

As can be seen in Figure 1, the study’s findings confirm that inoculating cabbage plants with Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens resulted in significant improvements in seedling quality, plant growth, yield, and yield-related indicators. Our results corroborate the findings of earlier researchers, who found that different crops inoculated with bio-inoculants, such as Pseudomonas, Azospirillum, and Azotobacter strains, showed similar increases in root and shoot weight, stem diameter, and leaf area [27]. This could be ascribed to the fact that these bio-control agents increased the surface area of roots, thereby improving seedling emergence, reducing the number of days required to reach the 2-true-leaf stage, and significantly impacting seedling height, stem diameter, leaf area, root length, seedling vigour index, seedling fresh and dry weight, and total chlorophyll content of cabbage seedlings [28]. Despite all these seedling quality metrics, the number of days required to transplant the seedlings and the days required to establish cabbage seedlings were also lowered by the combined action of the bio-control agent and PGPRs (Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria) [29]. All of this is linked to the improvements in water and nutrient uptake and the mineral absorption efficiency, most notably for sluggish mineral ions including phosphate, resulting in enhanced plant development in response to all bio-stimulants and rhizosphere microorganisms compared with the control [30].
Trichoderma is a kind of fungi present in all types of soils. This may improve the seed germination rate, growth, and vigour traits of plants. The result was confirmed with the finding of Sarkar et al. [31], where the dual inoculation of T. harzianum and P. fluorescens had a positive impact on root length, as it increased the microbial activity in the soil. PGPRs boost plant growth and increase root biomass or root morphology in general [32]. Plant root exudates are an intricate type of natural acid ionic species, phytosiderophores, sugar content, vitamin supplements, essential nutrients, purines, nucleosides, inorganic salts (e.g., HCO3, OH, H+), gaseous molecules (CO2, H2), enzymes, and root border cells that have considerable consequences on the mineral nutrient acquisition required for plant growth [33]. Faruk [34] elucidated that the application of biofungicides T. harzianum showed the seedling emergence, shoot and root length, and weight were improved. Further, the total chlorophyll content was increased in cabbage because the application of bio-fertilizers increases the content of nitrogen and phosphorus, which enhance the nutrient availability to the crops [35]. This increased amount of nitrogen in plants increased chlorophyll, coupled with increased net photosynthetic rates and carbohydrates content [36].
As per the findings of Marulanda et al. [37], these microbial treatments may also help to enhance the levels of IAA growth regulators, which also contribute to improvised seedling growth parameters, including root and shoot fresh weight and leaf area [38]. Further, the infusion of vermicompost with T. harzianum in cabbage greatly enhanced the seedling’s establishment rate [39]. In addition, the seedling height of the cabbage plant was significantly improved by incorporating the soil amendments and microbes [40]. Etesami and Maheshwari [41] previously revealed the positive influence of seed inoculation with rhizobacteria and biological control agents on the plant shoot’s dry weight and yield of various crops. They also proposed that the probable reason for this enhancement might be related to bacteria’s N2-fixing and phosphate-solubilizing abilities, as well as its capacity to create growth-promoting chemicals such as IAA [42]. Therefore, capacity of PGPRs to fix nitrogen may have been the key factor impacting seedling development and improving yield performance of cabbage in this investigation [43].
In general, the seeds’ and plant seedlings’ root dip before inoculating with the bio-control agent and PGPRs enabled them to possess better seedling quality in terms of emergence, days to 2-true-leaf stage, seedling growth (height and diameter), crop leaf area, root length, seed vigour index, fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll content, and number of days taken to establish the seedlings [44]. For all this, the possible explanation could be better photosynthetic activity as well as better efficiency and better availability of photosynthates, which is directly associated with the chlorophyll content of the plant [45]. The improvement in seedling quality as well as plant growth and yield-performing characteristics after inoculation with Trichoderma viride and Psedomonas fluroscens are supported by earlier researchers, who also worked on cauliflower [46]. The plant growth-promoting effects and yield enhancement of cabbage crops due to dual effect of PGPRs and bio-control agents on plants can be described in several different ways, including biological control and microbial activity implantation, physiological nitrogen metabolism, phosphorus emulsification, and/or endogenous hormone synthesis [47].
Further, the study also indicated a significant increase in the yield and yield-performing traits. Previous observations in cauliflower detailing an increase in numerous plant growth metrics with improved seedling quality corroborate our findings [48]. This may be explained by the fact that mycorrhizae symbiosis develops a better photosynthetic source for plants through increased leaf area, allowing the cabbage crop to produce a greater yield [46]. The increase in plant height and the head diameter was ascribed to the improved uptake of some nutrients such as boron through root colonization with bio-control agents and PGPRs [4]. The increase in total yield, as per our observations, might also have resulted from the improved root structure [49].

5. Conclusions

Our experiment revealed significant increases in seedling quality and production performance of cabbage after T. viride and P. fluorescens inoculation. Our findings confirm that seed treatment with 5% T. viride and seed treatment with 5% P. fluorescens before transplanting is efficient in improving seedling quality, including bio-mass and yield performance. The improvement in several metrics may be associated with greater nutrient availability due to the addition of a bio-control agent and PGPR with plant roots and improved root structures for greater water absorption. PGPR influences plant growth directly either by stimulating plant metabolism or by producing plant hormones such as auxins and gibberellins, solubilizing minerals and fixing atmospheric nitrogen, or indirectly by mitigating the negative effects of phytopathogenic microbes and improving stress tolerance. They also influence plant development by boosting nutrient availability and decreasing pathogenic infestation. Therefore, the application of T. viride and P. fluorescens as bio-control agents may be beneficial for obtaining higher crop yields in a sustainable manner to upgrade their seedling quality and yield-performing characteristics with low chemical input.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: P.K., T.K.M. and S.V.; methodology: P.K., N.S. and M.S.; software and data analysis S.V., P.K. and T.K.M.; data curation: M.S., S.V. and N.S.; drafting of manuscript, S.V., T.K.M. and P.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request.

Acknowledgments

Authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and corrections.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bhandari, S.R.; Choi, C.S.; Rhee, J.; Jo, J.S.; Shin, Y.K.; Song, J.W.; Lee, J.G. Seasonal Variation in Agronomic Characteristics and Sugar Content of Cabbage Genotypes. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2021, 81, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, Y.; Yue, Z.; Zhong, X.; Lei, J.; Tao, P.; Li, B. Distribution of Primary and Secondary Metabolites among the Leaf Layers of Headed Cabbage (Brassica oleracea Var. capitata). Food Chem. 2020, 312, 126028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bhandari, S.R.; Rhee, J.; Choi, C.S.; Jo, J.S.; Shin, Y.K.; Lee, J.G. Profiling of Individual Desulfo-Glucosinolate Content in Cabbage Head (Brassica oleracea Var. capitata) Germplasm. Molecules 2020, 25, 1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hussain, R.; Arif, S.; Sikander, M.A.; Memon, A.R. Effect of Using Bio-Control Agents on Growth, Yield, Head Quality and Root Rot Control in Broccoli Plants. Int. J. Acad. Res. 2011, 3, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  5. Emmanuel, O.C.; Babalola, O.O. Productivity and Quality of Horticultural Crops through Co-Inoculation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 239, 126569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, J.; Cook, J.; Nearing, J.T.; Zhang, J.; Raudonis, R.; Glick, B.R.; Langille, M.G.; Cheng, Z. Harnessing the Plant Microbiome to Promote the Growth of Agricultural Crops. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 245, 126690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Verma, R.; Maurya, B.R.; Meena, V.S. Integrated Effect of Bio-Organics with Chemical Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Cabbage (Brassica oleracea Var capitata). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 84, 914–919. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fasusi, O.A.; Cruz, C.; Babalola, O.O. Agricultural Sustainability: Microbial Biofertilizers in Rhizosphere Management. Agriculture 2021, 11, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yildirim, E.; Karlidag, H.; Turan, M.; Dursun, A.; Goktepe, F. Growth, Nutrient Uptake, and Yield Promotion of Broccoli by Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria with Manure. HortScience 2011, 46, 932–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hafeez, F.Y.; Yasmin, S.; Ariani, D.; Renseigné, N.; Zafar, Y.; Malik, K.A. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria as Biofertilizer. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2006, 26, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rakshit, A. Impact Assessment of Bio Priming Mediated Nutrient Use Efficiency for Climate Resilient Agriculture. In Climate Change and Agriculture in India: Impact and Adaptation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 57–68. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jha, M.K.; Urraiya, P.; Jha, B.; Sahu, M.R. Effect of Organic, Inrganic & Biofertilizers on Growth Attributes of Cabbage (Brassica oleracea Var. capitata). Under CG Plain Zone. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 2298–2300. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sarkar, D.; Ray, S.; Singh, N.K.; Rakshit, A.; Singh, H.B. Seed Priming with Bio-Inoculants Triggers Nutritional Enrichment in Vegetables: A Review. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol. 2018, 736, 727–735. [Google Scholar]
  14. Meena, S.K.; Rakshit, A.; Meena, V.S. Effect of Seed Bio-Priming and N Doses under Varied Soil Type on Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Greenhouse Conditions. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2016, 6, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ferjani, R.; Gharsa, H.; Estepa-Pérez, V.; Gómez-Sanz, E.; Cherni, M.; Mahjoubi, M.; Boudabous, A.; Torres, C.; Ouzari, H.-I. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizopseudomonas: Expanded Biotechnological Purposes and Antimicrobial Resistance Concern. Ann. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chandra, D.; Srivastava, R.; Glick, B.R.; Sharma, A.K. Drought-Tolerant Pseudomonas Spp. Improve the Growth Performance of Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) under Non-Stressed and Drought-Stressed Conditions. Pedosphere 2018, 28, 227–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karungi, J.; Kyamanywa, S.; Ekbom, B. Organic Soil Fertility Amendments and Tritrophic Relationships on Cabbage in Uganda: Experiences from on-Station and on-Farm Trials. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 5, 2862–2867. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hermosa, R.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Monte, E. Plant-Beneficial Effects of Trichoderma and of Its Genes. Microbiology 2012, 158, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, Y.-C.; Glick, B.R.; Bashan, Y.; Ryu, C.-M. Enhancement of Plant Drought Tolerance by Microbes. In Plant Responses to Drought Stress; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 383–413. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tanwar, A.; Aggarwal, A.; Kaushish, S.; Chauhan, S. Interactive Effect of AM Fungi with Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens on Growth and Yield of Broccoli. Plant Prot. Sci. 2013, 49, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sharma, M.; Delta, A.K.; Kaushik, P. Glomus Mosseae and Pseudomonas fluorescens Application Sustains Yield and Promote Tolerance to Water Stress in Helianthus annuus L. Stresses 2021, 1, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saini, I.; Aggarwal, A.; Kaushik, P. Inoculation with Mycorrhizal Fungi and Other Microbes to Improve the Morpho-Physiological and Floral Traits of Gazania Rigens (L.) Gaertn. Agriculture 2019, 9, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. El-Sawah, A.; El-Keblawy, A.; Ali, D.; Ibrahim, H.; El-Sheikh, M.; Sharma, A.; Alhaj Hamoud, Y.; Shaghaleh, H.; Brestic, M.; Skalicky, M.; et al. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Enhance Soil Key Enzymes, Plant Growth, Seed Yield, and Qualitative Attributes of Guar. Agriculture 2021, 11, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Delfine, S.; Alvino, A.; Loreto, F.; Centritto, M.; Santarelli, G. Effects of Water Stress on the Yield and Photosynthesis of Field-Grown Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). In Proceedings of the III International Symposium on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops 537, Lisbon, Portugal, 28 June–2 July 1999; pp. 223–229. [Google Scholar]
  25. Abdul, B.A.; Anderson, J.D. Vigour Determination in Soybean Seed by Multiple Criteria. Crop Sci. 1973, 13, 630–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Panse, V.G.; Sukhatme, P.V. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Stat. Methods Agric. Work. 1954, 48, 323–361. [Google Scholar]
  27. David, B.V.; Chandrasehar, G.; Selvam, P.N. Pseudomonas fluorescens: A Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterium (PGPR) With Potential Role in Biocontrol of Pests of Crops. In Crop Improvement through Microbial Biotechnology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 221–243. ISBN 978-0-444-63987-5. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mishra, V.; Gupta, A.; Kaur, P.; Singh, S.; Singh, N.; Gehlot, P.; Singh, J. Synergistic Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Bioremediation of Iron Contaminated Soils. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2016, 18, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Behera, B.C.; Singdevsachan, S.K.; Mishra, R.R.; Dutta, S.K.; Thatoi, H.N. Diversity, Mechanism and Biotechnology of Phosphate Solubilising Microorganism in Mangrove—A Review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2014, 3, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yadav, A.; Yadav, K.; Aggarwal, A. Impact of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi with Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens on Growth, Yield and Oil Content in Helianthus Annuus L. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2015, 18, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sarkar, D.; Sankar, A.; Devika, O.S.; Singh, S.; Shikha; Parihar, M.; Rakshit, A.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Gafur, A.; Ansari, M.J.; et al. Optimizing Nutrient Use Efficiency, Productivity, Energetics, and Economics of Red Cabbage Following Mineral Fertilization and Biopriming with Compatible Rhizosphere Microbes. 2021, 11, 15680. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bhattacharyya, P.N.; Jha, D.K. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): Emergence in Agriculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 1327–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Turan, M.; Esitken, A.; Sahin, F. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria as Alleviators for Soil Degradation. In Bacteria in Agrobiology: Stress Management; Maheshwari, D.K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 41–63. ISBN 978-3-642-23464-4. [Google Scholar]
  34. Faruk, M. Efficacy of Different Substrates to Formulate Trichoderma Harzianum against Seedling Disease of Cabbage. Bangladesh J. Agric. Res. 2019, 44, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yadav, L.P.; Kavita, A. Yield and Quality Response of Cabbage (Brassica oleracea) Var. Pride of India to Nitrogen and Biofertilizers. Curr. Hortic. 2016, 4, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jha, M.K.; Patel, D.; Verma, S.; Sao, Y. Effect of Organic, Inorganic and Biofertilizers on Head Yield of Cabbage (Brassica oleracea Var. capitata). Trends Biosci. 2017, 10, 7052–7054. [Google Scholar]
  37. Marulanda, A.; Barea, J.-M.; Azcón, R. Stimulation of Plant Growth and Drought Tolerance by Native Microorganisms (AM Fungi and Bacteria) from Dry Environments: Mechanisms Related to Bacterial Effectiveness. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2009, 28, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Samancioglu, A.; Yildirim, E.; Turan, M.; Kotan, R.; Sahin, U.; Kul, R. Amelioration of Drought Stress Adverse Effect and Mediating Biochemical Content of Cabbage Seedlings by Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria. IJAB 2016, 18, 948–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nahar, M.; Rahman, M.; Kibria, M.; Karim, A.R.; Miller, S. Use of Tricho-Compost and Tricho-Leachate for Management of Soil-Borne Pathogens and Production of Healthy Cabbage Seedlings. Bangladesh J. Agric. Res. 2013, 37, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Uddin, M.M.; Akhtar, N.; Islam, M.T.; Faruq, A.N. Effect of Trichoderma Harzianum and Some Selected Soil Amendments on Damping-Off Disease of Cabbage and Cauliflower. J. Exp. Biosci. 2011, 2, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  41. Etesami, H.; Maheshwari, D.K. Use of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPRs) with Multiple Plant Growth Promoting Traits in Stress Agriculture: Action Mechanisms and Future Prospects. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 156, 225–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, F.; Yuan, J.; Yang, X.; Cui, Y.; Chen, L.; Ran, W.; Shen, Q. Putative Trichoderma Harzianum Mutant Promotes Cucumber Growth by Enhanced Production of Indole Acetic Acid and Plant Colonization. Plant Soil 2013, 368, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gopalakrishnan, S.; Sathya, A.; Vijayabharathi, R.; Varshney, R.K.; Gowda, C.L.L.; Krishnamurthy, L. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobia: Challenges and Opportunities. 3 Biotech 2015, 5, 355–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khalil, M.E. Efficiency of Trichoderma viride and Bacillus Subtilis as Biocontrol Agents against Root Rot Caused by Fusarium Solani in Tomato. Egypt. J. Agric. Res. 2019, 97, 507–516. [Google Scholar]
  45. Duc, N. Combined Inoculation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma Spp. for Enhancing Defense Enzymes and Yield of Three Pepper Cultivars. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2017, 15, 1815–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ekinci, M.; Turan, M.; Yildirim, E.; Güneş, A.; Kotan, R.; Dursun, A. Effect of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Growth, Nutrient, Organic Acid, Amino Acid and Hormone Content of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. Var. botrytis) Transplants. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2014, 13, 71–85. [Google Scholar]
  47. Mia, M.B.; Shamsuddin, Z.H.; Mahmood, M. Effects of Rhizobia and Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria Inoculation on Germination and Seedling Vigor of Lowland Rice. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 3758–3765. [Google Scholar]
  48. Cheah, L.H.; Veerakone, S.; Kent, G. Biological Control of Clubroot on Cauliflower with Trichoderma and Streptomyces spp. N. Z. Plant Prot. 2000, 53, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Altomare, C.; Norvell, W.A.; Björkman, T.; Harman, G.E. Solubilization of Phosphates and Micronutrients by the Plant-Growth-Promoting and Biocontrol Fungus Trichoderma harzianum Rifai 1295-22. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 2926–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of different treatments involving Trichoderma viride (T1), Pseudomonas fluorescens (T2), and their combination (T3) on seedling emergence (%), days to 2-true-leaf stage, seedling height (cm), days to transplant, stem diameter (mm), and leaf area (cm2) traits of cabbage compared with the control (C). Means with the different letter (a, b, etc.) are significantly different at p < 0.05 based on the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Figure 1. Effect of different treatments involving Trichoderma viride (T1), Pseudomonas fluorescens (T2), and their combination (T3) on seedling emergence (%), days to 2-true-leaf stage, seedling height (cm), days to transplant, stem diameter (mm), and leaf area (cm2) traits of cabbage compared with the control (C). Means with the different letter (a, b, etc.) are significantly different at p < 0.05 based on the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Sustainability 14 07583 g001
Figure 2. Effect of different treatments involving Trichoderma viride (T1), Pseudomonas fluorescens (T2), and their combination (T3) on seedling vigour index, root length (cm), seedling fresh weight (gm), seedling dry weight (gm), total chlorophyll content (mg/g of fresh weight), and days to establishment traits of cabbage compared with the control (C). Means with the different letter (a, b, etc.) are significantly different at p < 0.05 based on the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Figure 2. Effect of different treatments involving Trichoderma viride (T1), Pseudomonas fluorescens (T2), and their combination (T3) on seedling vigour index, root length (cm), seedling fresh weight (gm), seedling dry weight (gm), total chlorophyll content (mg/g of fresh weight), and days to establishment traits of cabbage compared with the control (C). Means with the different letter (a, b, etc.) are significantly different at p < 0.05 based on the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Sustainability 14 07583 g002
Figure 3. Plant height, root length, and root dry weight after 30 and 60 days of treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma viride and their combination (T3). The treated samples had significant differences compared with the control (C). Means with the different letter (a, b, etc.) are significantly different at p < 0.05 based on the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Figure 3. Plant height, root length, and root dry weight after 30 and 60 days of treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma viride and their combination (T3). The treated samples had significant differences compared with the control (C). Means with the different letter (a, b, etc.) are significantly different at p < 0.05 based on the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Sustainability 14 07583 g003
Figure 4. Bio-mass details of cabbage plants at the harvesting stage. Treatment involving Trichoderma viride (T1), Pseudomonas fluorescens (T2), and their combination (T3) performed better than control (C). Means with the different letter (a, b, etc.) are significantly different at p < 0.05 based on the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Figure 4. Bio-mass details of cabbage plants at the harvesting stage. Treatment involving Trichoderma viride (T1), Pseudomonas fluorescens (T2), and their combination (T3) performed better than control (C). Means with the different letter (a, b, etc.) are significantly different at p < 0.05 based on the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Sustainability 14 07583 g004
Figure 5. Pearson’s correlations among the seedling quality, yield, and yield-contributing factors of cabbage studied with T. viride and P. fluorescens. *, **, *** denote significance at the 10, 5 and 1 percent level, respectively.
Figure 5. Pearson’s correlations among the seedling quality, yield, and yield-contributing factors of cabbage studied with T. viride and P. fluorescens. *, **, *** denote significance at the 10, 5 and 1 percent level, respectively.
Sustainability 14 07583 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vij, S.; Sharma, N.; Sharma, M.; Mohanta, T.K.; Kaushik, P. Application of Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens to Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) Improves Both Its Seedling Quality and Field Performance. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137583

AMA Style

Vij S, Sharma N, Sharma M, Mohanta TK, Kaushik P. Application of Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens to Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) Improves Both Its Seedling Quality and Field Performance. Sustainability. 2022; 14(13):7583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137583

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vij, Shilpa, Neha Sharma, Meenakshi Sharma, Tapan Kumar Mohanta, and Prashant Kaushik. 2022. "Application of Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens to Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) Improves Both Its Seedling Quality and Field Performance" Sustainability 14, no. 13: 7583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137583

APA Style

Vij, S., Sharma, N., Sharma, M., Mohanta, T. K., & Kaushik, P. (2022). Application of Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens to Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) Improves Both Its Seedling Quality and Field Performance. Sustainability, 14(13), 7583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137583

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop