Green Marketing: Drivers in the Process of Buying Green Products—The Role of Green Satisfaction, Green Trust, Green WOM and Green Perceived Value
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Green Perceived Value (GPV)
1.2. Green Trust (GT)
1.3. Green Satisfaction (GS)
1.4. Green Word of Mouth (WOM)
1.5. Green Purchase Intention (GPI)
1.6. Hypotheses and Research Model
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Implications
5. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kautish, P.; Sharma, R. Study on relationships among terminal and instrumental values, environmental consciousness and behavioral intentions for green products. J. Indian Bus. Res. 2018, 13, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Dong, F. Why do consumers make green purchase decisions? Insights from a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karjaluoto, H.; Vaccaro, V.L. B2B green marketing and innovation theory for competitive advantage. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2009, 11, 315–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garvey, A.M.; Bolton, L.E. Eco-product choice cuts both ways: How proenvironmental licensing versus reinforcement is contingent on environmental consciousness. J. Public Policy Mark. 2017, 36, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.; Bock, D.; Joseph, M. Green marketing: What the Millennials buy. J. Bus. Strategy 2013, 34, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pareja, J.; Roy, Q. Valor Percibido, Riesgo Verde y Confianza Verde En Relación A La Intención De Compra De Productos Green; Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC): Santiago, Peru, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Amoako, G.K.; Dzogbenuku, R.K.; Doe, J.; Adjaison, K.G. Green marketing and the SDGs: Emerging market perspective. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2020; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Issock, P.B.; Issock, M.; Mpinganjira, M. Roberts-Lombard. Modelling green customer loyalty and positive word of mouth: Can environmental knowledge make the difference in an emerging market? Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 2019, 15, 405–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pahlevi, M.R.; Suhartanto, D. The integrated model of green loyalty: Evidence from eco-friendly plastic products. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 257, 120844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S.; Chang, C.H. Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Manag. Decis. 2012, 50, 502–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, W.; Zhang, Q. Green purchase intention: Effects of electronic service quality and customer green psychology. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 267, 122053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S. The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 93, 307–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Lobo, A.; Leckie, C. Green brand benefits and their influence on brand loyalty. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2017, 35, 425–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweeney, G.N.; Soutar, J.C. Customer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. J. Retail. 2001, 77, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.F.; Chen, F.S. Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tour. Manag. 2010, 31, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Xue, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, J. Green image and consumers’ word-of-mouth intention in the green hotel industry: The moderating effect of Millennials. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 181, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S.; Lin, C.L.; Chang, C.H. The influence of greenwash on green word-of-mouth (green WOM): The mediation effects of green perceived quality and green satisfaction. Qual. Quant. 2014, 48, 2411–2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Ma, B.; Bai, R. The spillover effect of greenwashing behaviours: An experimental approach. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2019, 38, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higuchi, A.; Avadi, A. Factores que influyen en la decisión de compra de productos orgánicos y clasificación de sus consumidores según preferencias en el área metropolitana de Lima, Perú. Agron. Colomb. 2015, 33, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freeman, R.E.; McVea, J. A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In The Blackwell handbook of strategic management; Blackwell Publishers Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 183–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riva, F.; Magrizos, S.; Rubel, M.R.B.; Rizomyliotis, I. Green consumerism, green perceived value, and restaurant revisit intention: Millennials’ sustainable consumption with moderating effect of green perceived quality. In Business Strategy and the Environment; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rustam, A.; Wang, Y.; Zameer, H. Environmental awareness, firm sustainability exposure and green consumption behaviors. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 268, 122016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, B.; Manrai, A.K.; Manrai, L.A. Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: A conceptual framework and empirical study. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 34, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Determinants of Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 134, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil, M.T.; Jacob, J. The relationship between green perceived quality and green purchase intention: A three-path mediation approach using green satisfaction and green trust. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 2018, 15, 301–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S. Towards green loyalty: Driving from green perceived value, green satisfaction, and green trust. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 21, 294–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peattie, K.; Ratnayaka, M. Responding to the green movement. Ind. Mark. Manag. 1992, 21, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, S.K.; Kaur, G. Green Marketing: An Indian Perspective. Decision 2004, 31, 168–209. [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Fernández, R.; Iniesta-Bonillo, M.Á. The concept of perceived value: A systematic review of the research. Mark. Theory 2007, 7, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hennigs, N.; Klarmann, C. Hedonic Consumption. In Wiley Encyclopedia of Management; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; Volume 46, p. 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheth, J.N.; Newman, B.I.; Gross, B.L. Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values: Discovery Service for Air Force Institute of Technology. J. Bus. Res. 1991, 22, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamari, J.; Hanner, N.; Koivisto, J. “Why pay premium in freemium services?” A study on perceived value, continued use and purchase intentions in free-to-play games. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 51, 102040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDougall, G.H.G.; Levesque, T. Customer satisfaction with services: Putting perceived value into the equation. J. Serv. Mark. 2000, 14, 392–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kardes, F.R.; Posavac, S.S.; Cronley, M.L. Consumer inference: A review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts. J. Consum. Psychol. 2004, 14, 230–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Peterson, R.T. Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: The role of switching costs. Psychol. Mark. 2004, 21, 799–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ariffin, S.; Yusof, J.M.; Putit, L.; Shah, M.I.A. Factors Influencing Perceived Quality and Repurchase Intention Towards Green Products. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2016, 37, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, A.Y.C.; Lau, M.M.; Cheung, R. Modelling the Relationship among Green Perceived Value, Green Trust, Satisfaction, and Repurchase Intention of Green Products. Contemp. Manag. Res. 2016, 12, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abosag, I.; Tynan, C.; Lewis, C. The commitment-trust theory: The british and Saudi Arabian cross-national perspectives. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham, Semenyih, Malaysia, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Doney, P.M.; Cannon, J.P. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. J. Mark. 1997, 61, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harper, G.C.; Makatouni, A. Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. Br. Food J. 2002, 104, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalafatis, S.P.; Pollard, M.; East, R.; Tsogas, M.H. Green marketing and Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour: A cross-market examination. J. Consum. Mark. 1999, 16, 441–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guenzi, P.; Johnson, M.D.; Castaldo, S. A comprehensive model of customer trust in two retail stores. J. Serv. Manag. 2009, 20, 290–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sirdeshmukh, D.; Singh, J.; Sabol, B. Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. J. Mark. 2002, 66, 15–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gefen, D.; Straub, D.W. Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega 2004, 32, 407–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotler, P. Marketing Management, Millenium Edition. Mark. Manag. 2000, 23, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ameer, I.A. Satisfaction-A behavioral perspective on consumer: Review, criticism and contribution. Int. J. Res. Stud. Manag. 2013, 3, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zouari, G.; Abdelhedi, M. Customer satisfaction in the digital era: Evidence from Islamic banking. J. Innov. Entrep. 2021, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gelderman, C.J.; Schijns, J.; Lambrechts, W.; Vijgen, S. Green marketing as an environmental practice: The impact on green satisfaction and green loyalty in a business-to-business context. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 2061–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardozo, R.N. An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction. J. Mark. Res. 1965, 2, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L. Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation. J. Appl. Psychol. 1976, 62, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L. A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. J. Mark. Res. 1980, 17, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L. Conceptual Issues in the Structural Analysis of Consumption Emotion, Satisfaction, and Qualit. Adv. Consum. Res. 1994, 21, 16–22. [Google Scholar]
- Zulfiqar, Z.; Shafaat, M. Green Marketing: Environmental Concern and Customer Satisfaction. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. 2015, 7, 2222–2839. [Google Scholar]
- Swan, J.E.; Oliver, R.L. Postpurchase Communications by Consumers. J. Retail. 1989, 65, 516–533. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, M.K.O.; Shi, N.; Cheung, C.M.K.; Lim, K.H.; Sia, C.L. Consumer’s decision to shop online: The moderating role of positive informational social influence. Inf. Manag. 2011, 48, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, J.O.; Broderick, A.J.; Lee, N. Online Communities: Conceptualizing the Online Social Network. J. Interact. Mark. 2007, 21, 2–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molinari, L.K.; Abratt, R.; Dion, P. Satisfaction, quality and value and effects on repurchase and positive word-of-mouth behavioral intentions in a B2B services context. J. Serv. Mark. 2008, 22, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arndt, J. Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product. J. Mark. Res. 1967, 4, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hennig-Thurau, T.; Gwinner, K.P.; Walsh, G.; Gremler, D.D. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? J. Interact. Mark. 2004, 18, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hausenblas, H.A.; Carron, A.V.; Mack, D.E. Application of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior to exercise behavior: A meta-analysis. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1997, 19, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grace, P.I.; Ming, T. Antecedents of consumer attitude towards blogger recommendations and its impact on purchase intention. Asian J. Bus. Account. 2018, 11, 293–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belch, G.E.; Belch, M.A. Advertising and Promotion. An Integrated Marketing Communication Perspective, 9th ed.; MGraw-Hill Irwin: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Ferdinand, M.; Selamat, F. Brand Personality to Predict Brand Trust, Brand Attachment and Purchase Intention: Study on Cosmetic Products in Jakarta. In Proceedings of the Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2019), Jakarta, Indonesia, 27–28 June 2019; Volume 439, pp. 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nia, B.P.; Dyah, I.R.; Hery, S.; Bayu, D.S. The Effect of Green Purchase Intention Factors on the Environmental Friendly Detergent Product (Lerak). E3S Web Conf. 2018, 73, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lutfie, H.; Marcelino, D. Consumer Trust to Buy Green Product: Investigation of Green Perceived Value with Green Satisfaction Mediation. In Proceedings of the 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, CITSM 2020, Pangkal Pinang, Indonesia, 23–24 October 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karatu, V.M.H.; Mat, N.K.N. The Mediating effects of green trust and perceived behavioral control on the direct determinants of intention to purchase green products in Nigeria. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 2015, 6, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lakatos, E.S.; Nan, L.M.; Bacali, L.; Ciobanu, G.; Ciobanu, A.M.; Cioca, L.I. Consumer Satisfaction towards Green Products: Empirical Insights from Romania. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.H.; Wu, C.W.; Lee, C.T.; Lee, H.J. Green purchase intentions: An exploratory study of the Taiwanese electric motorcycle market. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 829–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.J. Antecedents of behavioral intentions for green city tourists. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 24, 377–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Hyun, S.S. Customer retention in the medical tourism industry: Impact of quality, satisfaction, trust, and price reasonableness. Tour. Manag. 2015, 46, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, P. Customer loyalty: Exploring its antecedents from a green marketing perspective. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 27, 896–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suhartanto, D.; Kartikasari, A.; Hapsari, R.; Budianto, B.S.; Najib, M.; Astor, Y. Predicting young customers’ intention to repurchase green plastic products: Incorporating trust model into purchase intention model. J. Asia Bus. Stud. 2021, 15, 441–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konuk, F.A. Antecedents of Green Behavioral Intentions. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2015, 20, 776–780. [Google Scholar]
- Guerreiro, J.; Pacheco, M. How Green Trust, Consumer Brand Engagement and Green Word-of-Mouth Mediate Purchasing Intentions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hameed, I.; Hussain, H.; Khan, K. The role of green practices toward the green word-of-mouth using stimulus-organism-response model. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights, 2021; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhir, A.; Sadiq, M.; Talwar, S.; Sakashita, M.; Kaur, P. Why do retail consumers buy green apparel? A knowledge-attitude-behaviour-context perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 59, 102398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Söderlund, M. Customer satisfaction and its consequences on customer behaviour revisited: The impact of different levels of satisfaction on word-of-mouth, feedback to the supplier and loyalty. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 1998, 9, 169–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suhartanto, D.; Ali, M.H.; Tan, K.H.; Sjahroeddin, F.; Kusdibyo, L. Loyalty toward online food delivery service: The role of e-service quality and food quality. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2019, 22, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reichheld, F.F.; Sasser, W.E. Zero defections: Quality comes to services. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1990, 68, 105–111. [Google Scholar]
- Bernal, C. Ruta para la elaboración de la propuesta o anteproyecto de investigación científica. Libro 2010, 3, 20. [Google Scholar]
- Riconscente, M.; Romeo, I. Technique for the measurement of attitudes, A. In Encyclopedia of Research Design; Salkind, N.J., Ed.; SAGE Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamdollah, R.; Baghaei, P. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling with R. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 2016, 21, 11. [Google Scholar]
- Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 732–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Hair, J.F. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benitez, J.; Henseler, J.; Castillo, A.; Schuberth, F. How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Inf. Manag. 2020, 57, 103168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Fassott, G.; Dijkstra, T.K.; Wilson, B. Analysing quadratic effects of formative constructs by means of variance-based structural equation modelling. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2012, 21, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-Entrena, M.; Schuberth, F.; Gelhard, C. Assessing statistical differences between parameters estimates in Partial Least Squares path modeling. Qual. Quant. 2018, 52, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarstedt, M.; Hair, J.F.; Cheah, J.H.; Becker, J.M.; Ringle, C.M. How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australas. Mark. J. 2019, 27, 197–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jöreskog, K.G. Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations*. ETS Res. Bull. Ser. 1971, 1970, i-31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Sarstedt, M.; Hopkins, L.; Kuppelwieser, V.G. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2014, 26, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dijkstra, T.K.; Henseler, J. Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2015, 39, 297–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sinkovics, R.R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv. Int. Mark. 2009, 20, 277–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wold, H. Soft Modelling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions. In Systems under Indirect Observations: Part II; North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Danks, N.; Ray, S.; Shmueli, G. Evaluating the Predictive Performance of Constructs in PLS Path Modeling. SSRN Electron. J. 2017, 59, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shmueli, G.; Sarstedt, M.; Hair, J.F.; Cheah, J.H.; Ting, H.; Vaithilingam, S.; Ringle, C.M. Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. Eur. J. Mark. 2019, 53, 2322–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, S.; Khare, A. The Role of Retailer Trust and Word of Mouth in Buying Organic Foods in an Emerging Market. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2017, 23, 926–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamzah, M.I.; Othman, A.K.; Rashid, W.E.W.; Ngah, N.M.A. The relationship between halal factors and purchase intention of food products as moderated by word-of-mouth communications. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2020, 21, 865–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mai, L.W.; Ness, M.R. Canonical correlation analysis of customer satisfaction and future purchase of mail-order speciality food. Br. Food J. 1999, 101, 857–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martenson, R. Corporate brand image, satisfaction and store loyalty: A study of the store as a brand, store brands and manufacturer brands. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2007, 35, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryu, K.; Lee, H.; Kim, W.G. The influence of the quality of the physical environment, food, and service on restaurant image, customer perceived value, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 24, 200–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Demographic Profile | Frequency | % |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Female | 189 | 64% |
Male | 108 | 36% |
Age | ||
Under 18 | 9 | 3% |
18 to 25 years old | 147 | 49% |
26 to 35 years old | 95 | 32% |
36 to 45 years old | 40 | 13% |
46 and over | 6 | 2% |
Occupation | ||
Student | 102 | 34% |
Employee | 126 | 42% |
Self-employed | 59 | 20% |
Unemployed or retired | 10 | 3% |
Place of purchase | ||
Eco-fair | 58 | 20% |
Specialised shops | 95 | 32% |
Online websites of specialised shops or supermarkets | 54 | 18% |
Supermarkets | 90 | 30% |
Products | ||
Dairy | 102 | 15% |
Snacks (cereal bars, biscuits) | 175 | 26% |
Health drinks | 84 | 12% |
Oils and vinegars | 96 | 14% |
Granola and corn flakes | 154 | 23% |
Other | 62 | 9% |
Frequency of purchase | ||
Weekly | 52 | 18% |
More than once a month | 59 | 20% |
Monthly | 134 | 45% |
Infrequently | 52 | 18% |
Scales | Median | DE |
---|---|---|
Green Perceived Value (GPV)—Pahlevi, M.R., Suhartanto, D. (2020) [9] | ||
GPV1—Organic products provide more benefits than the cost of obtaining them. They are worth it. | 4.16 | 0.72 |
GPV2—Organic products are more environmentally sound and health-conscious than more conventional products. | 4.39 | 0.67 |
GPV3—Organic products are more beneficial to my health and the environment than more conventional ones. | 4.43 | 0.66 |
Green Trust (GT)—Pahlevi, M.R., Suhartanto, D. (2020) [9] | ||
GT1—I believe organic products have a good reputation because they help our health and the environment. | 4.26 | 0.75 |
GT2—I believe that organic products are reliable. | 4.15 | 0.72 |
GT3—I believe in the brands that sell organic and eco-friendly products. | 3.91 | 0.90 |
GT4—I believe that organic products live up to their promises to care for our health and the environment. | 4.05 | 0.84 |
Green Satisfaction (GS)—Pahlevi, M.R., Suhartanto, D. (2020) [9] | ||
GS1—Using organic products makes me feel good and satisfied. | 4.28 | 0.62 |
GS2—I think it is a wise decision to buy organic products. | 4.25 | 0.61 |
GS3—Overall, I am satisfied with organic products. | 4.12 | 0.80 |
Green Word of Mouth (GW)—Ahmad, W., Zhang, Q. (2020) [11] | ||
GW1—Due to their eco-friendly and healthy image, organic products are recommended by other people. | 4.12 | 0.76 |
GW2—Due to their environmental and health benefits, organic products are positively recommended by other people. | 4.22 | 0.62 |
GW3—Due to being environmentally friendly and healthy, organic products have a good reputation. | 4.25 | 0.69 |
GW4—Due to their environmental and health benefits, organic products receive positive feedback from people. | 4.21 | 0.68 |
Green Purchase Intention (GPI)—Ahmad, W., Zhang, Q. (2020) [11] | ||
GPI1—Because of my concerns about the environment and health, I will try to buy organic products. | 4.26 | 0.62 |
GPI2—I intend to buy organic products due to their ecological and health performance. | 4.10 | 0.74 |
GPI3—I intend to buy organic products because of their environmental impact and health benefits. | 4.21 | 0.68 |
GPI4—I am happy to buy organic products because of their respect for the environment and health. | 4.34 | 0.64 |
GPI5- I will keep myself updated about the benefits of using organic products. | 4.22 | 0.76 |
GPI6—I will buy organic products when I need to buy healthy things. | 4.26 | 0.72 |
Latent Variable | Indicators | Loadings | Cronbach’s Alpha | rho_A | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPI | GPI2 | 0.84 | 0.844 | 0.849 | 0.889 | 0.617 |
GPI3 | 0.83 | |||||
GPI4 | 0.77 | |||||
GPI5 | 0.73 | |||||
GPI6 | 0.75 | |||||
GPV | GPV1 | 0.70 | 0.718 | 0.747 | 0.841 | 0.640 |
GPV2 | 0.83 | |||||
GPV3 | 0.86 | |||||
GS | GS1 | 0.78 | 0.726 | 0.728 | 0.845 | 0.646 |
GS2 | 0.85 | |||||
GS3 | 0.78 | |||||
GT | GT1 | 0.78 | 0.843 | 0.844 | 0.895 | 0.681 |
GT2 | 0.80 | |||||
GT3 | 0.86 | |||||
GT4 | 0.87 | |||||
GW | GW1 | 0.71 | 0.818 | 0.833 | 0.880 | 0.648 |
GW2 | 0.81 | |||||
GW3 | 0.86 | |||||
GW4 | 0.83 |
GPI | GPV | GS | GT | GW | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPI | 0.785 | ||||
GPV | 0.439 | 0.800 | |||
GS | 0.714 | 0.525 | 0.803 | ||
GT | 0.653 | 0.629 | 0.670 | 0.825 | |
GW | 0.598 | 0.514 | 0.637 | 0.600 | 0.805 |
GPI | GPV | GS | GT | GW | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPI | |||||
GPV | 0.557 | ||||
GS | 0.899 | 0.728 | |||
GT | 0.774 | 0.797 | 0.845 | ||
GW | 0.707 | 0.656 | 0.812 | 0.711 |
β | T-Value | p-Values Sig < 0.05 | Supported | p-Values Sig < 0.01 | Supported | f2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1—GPV → GT | 0.63 | 12.81 | 0.000 | Yes | 0.000 | Yes | 0.24 |
H2—GPV → GS | 0.52 | 9.22 | 0.000 | Yes | 0.000 | Yes | 0.38 |
H3—GS →GT | 0.47 | 7.84 | 0.000 | Yes | 0.000 | Yes | 0.36 |
H4—GT → GW | 0.31 | 4.66 | 0.000 | Yes | 0.000 | Yes | 0.10 |
H5—GT → GPI | 0.32 | 5.18 | 0.000 | Yes | 0.000 | Yes | 0.08 |
H6—GS → GW | 0.57 | 10.41 | 0.000 | Yes | 0.000 | Yes | 0.19 |
H7—GS → GPI | 0.65 | 15.90 | 0.000 | Yes | 0.000 | Yes | 0.21 |
H8—GW → GPI | 0.16 | 2.48 | 0.013 | Yes | 0.013 | No | 0.03 |
PLS-SEM | LM | PLS-SEM − LM | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RMSE | Q2predict | RMSE | RMSE | |
GPI3 | 0.636 | 0.141 | 0.645 | −0.009 |
GPI6 | 0.705 | 0.093 | 0.701 | 0.005 |
GPI4 | 0.620 | 0.114 | 0.630 | −0.009 |
GPI2 | 0.728 | 0.111 | 0.738 | −0.010 |
GPI5 | 0.743 | 0.108 | 0.754 | −0.011 |
GS3 | 0.775 | 0.130 | 0.780 | −0.006 |
GS2 | 0.541 | 0.186 | 0.541 | 0.000 |
GS1 | 0.549 | 0.204 | 0.554 | −0.005 |
GT3 | 0.854 | 0.186 | 0.859 | −0.005 |
GT1 | 0.664 | 0.280 | 0.657 | 0.007 |
GT4 | 0.741 | 0.256 | 0.738 | 0.003 |
GT2 | 0.603 | 0.325 | 0.607 | −0.004 |
GW4 | 0.618 | 0.212 | 0.619 | −0.001 |
GW3 | 0.633 | 0.203 | 0.639 | −0.006 |
GW1 | 0.735 | 0.120 | 0.742 | −0.007 |
GW2 | 0.619 | 0.102 | 0.629 | −0.010 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Román-Augusto, J.A.; Garrido-Lecca-Vera, C.; Lodeiros-Zubiria, M.L.; Mauricio-Andia, M. Green Marketing: Drivers in the Process of Buying Green Products—The Role of Green Satisfaction, Green Trust, Green WOM and Green Perceived Value. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10580. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710580
Román-Augusto JA, Garrido-Lecca-Vera C, Lodeiros-Zubiria ML, Mauricio-Andia M. Green Marketing: Drivers in the Process of Buying Green Products—The Role of Green Satisfaction, Green Trust, Green WOM and Green Perceived Value. Sustainability. 2022; 14(17):10580. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710580
Chicago/Turabian StyleRomán-Augusto, Jose Antonio, Camila Garrido-Lecca-Vera, Manuel Luis Lodeiros-Zubiria, and Martin Mauricio-Andia. 2022. "Green Marketing: Drivers in the Process of Buying Green Products—The Role of Green Satisfaction, Green Trust, Green WOM and Green Perceived Value" Sustainability 14, no. 17: 10580. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710580
APA StyleRomán-Augusto, J. A., Garrido-Lecca-Vera, C., Lodeiros-Zubiria, M. L., & Mauricio-Andia, M. (2022). Green Marketing: Drivers in the Process of Buying Green Products—The Role of Green Satisfaction, Green Trust, Green WOM and Green Perceived Value. Sustainability, 14(17), 10580. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710580