3.1.1. Three-Dimensional Structural Analysis Design Paradigm
Based on the operation mechanism of the subjective-cultural ecological design system of vernacular architecture, the feedback mechanism of the emotional model connects the subject and cultural and spatial dimensions in series. It constructs a three-dimensional structural analysis paradigm of the subjective–cultural–ecological design system. This framework decomposes the system’s external input and internal output factors in terms of subject, cultural and spatial dimensions. The subject dimension then serves as the core processing layer of this system, evaluating and weighing each sublevel of the cultural and spatial dimensions. As in
Figure 5, each factor axis in each dimension consists of many squares, representing the connection between each cultural factor, each spatial factor, and the subject’s perception. In the right-angle spatial coordinates, the intertwined factor axes form a three-dimensional, organic, and visualized design analysis research framework, which makes the theory, design methods, and evaluation methods in the subjective-cultural ecological design system clear at a glance. It provides a clear and complete design research framework for redesigning vernacular architecture and a more systematic and scientific research idea and method for conserving and sustainable development of contemporary vernacular architecture.
(1) Subject dimensions
The post-epidemic era will soon usher in an era of “five-sense architecture,” where integrating elements that stimulate the five senses in architecture can free the mind and body. Therefore, this study suggests that the five-senses experience is closely related to the design of vernacular architecture. Some scholars believe that the origin of architecture is not the type of form but the eternal necessity of “desire for the expression [
18].” In the theoretical framework of the subjective–cultural–ecological design system, the five senses of residents play the role of “desire for the expression.” Influenced by the cultural values of religion and primitive beliefs, the inhabitants usually create an architectural environment that satisfies both material and spiritual needs by expressing intuitive experiences based on their instincts. The visual field is only a flat perception, but when the senses of touch, smell, hearing, and taste are involved in the process of perception, it deepens the dimension and depth of our memory [
19]. Wuli Village in Pinzhongluo County, Nujiang Prefecture, Yunnan Province, is a typical village in Nujiang where the architectural forms and styles of the Nu ethnic dwellings are relatively well preserved. The village’s inhabitants are mainly of the Nu ethnic group and worship nature. From
Figure 6a,b, we can see the natural harmony of the mountain, water, people, and dwelling pattern in Wuli Village, which shows the wisdom of the Nu people living by the mountain and water.
Figure 6c shows that every flower, plant, and tree in the living space around the residential buildings seems to have a spiritual nature. This picture leads us to imagine the warmth of the wood we can touch, the fragrance of the flowers we can smell, and the chirping of the cicadas and birds we can hear, creating a scene of the natural and simple rural life of the residents. The stimulation of the five senses brings a creative energy that awakens the emotional resonance of our interaction with vernacular architecture. As a result, the subject dimension introduces the five senses theory to evaluate and analyze vernacular architecture’s cultural and spatial environment with rational thinking based on sensibility.
(2) Cultural dimension
As an art appreciation building or a social, communal building, architectural forms are inseparable from a particular society’s historical and cultural background [
20]. We see not just an ordinary residential building, but the cultural phenomenon of ethnic settlement. Based on the research and data review, the cultural dimension is broken down into five essential factors: physical geography, religious beliefs, cultural interactions, artistic aesthetics, and lifestyle. Natural geography, religious beliefs, and cultural interactions determine vernacular architecture’s cultural value and style [
21]. As shown in
Figure 7a, the hollow bottom of traditional Dai vernacular architecture perfectly fits the complex and changing mountainous terrain and hot and humid environment of Dehong Prefecture. The three-story gable green tile roof of the Mangxuan Zang room shows the characteristics of the roof form of Southern Theravada Buddhist monastery architecture. At the same time, cultural interactions have also produced the phenomenon of cultural intermingling, as in
Figure 7b, where the layout structure of the public security department of the ancient Dehong Prefecture was modeled after the form of Chinese Han Dynasty architecture. On the other hand, artistic aesthetics and lifestyle determine the construction techniques and texture expression of vernacular architecture. For example, in
Figure 7c, under the influence of Buddhist culture, traditional Zang houses embody the construction features of multi-story eaves and tile roofs. The doors, windows, and eaves are carved with exquisite flower and bird patterns. The overall exquisite decoration and architectural forms reflect the aesthetic concepts of Buddhist culture and meet the emotional pattern atmosphere required for religious activities. The Hani people have developed a unique land use system based on the mountain’s terrain, forming a natural ecological cycle system of four elements, forest, village, terraced fields, and water system, as shown in
Figure 7d. At the same time, the Hani people have cultivated the belief in worshiping nature and gods by worshipping water, fields, and forests. The mushroom house in the village of Azheke fully demonstrates the wisdom of Hani’s life practices, as shown in
Figure 7e,f. The mushroom houses in the village of Azheke are warm in winter and cool in summer, and the building materials are mainly earthen-based walls, bamboo and wood frames, and thatched roofs. The bottom floor of the house is for raising livestock and storing farming tools; the middle floor is a living room with a fire pit in the center, and the top floor is used for stacking miscellaneous things. The middle floor also has a terrace, an important place for people’s production work, daily life, and leisure activities.
(3) Spatial dimension
This dimension draws on the division of spatial elements in the concept of multi-meaning space proposed by scholars such as Dai Zhizhong. Therefore, this study separates the spatial dimension into four factors, scale, form, quality, and relationship of space, as the main design elements of the spatial structure of vernacular architecture [
22]. The scale of space then represents the scale-proportional relationship of space. As shown in
Figure 8a, the vernacular architecture of Wolong Ancient Fishing Village in Kunming utilizes the earth and wood structure, and the material of the earth base wall makes the architecture present a thick, safe, and solid volume characteristic in visual perception. The form of space includes the external form of space and the internal form of space. As shown in
Figure 8b,c, the exterior form of the buildings of the ancient fishing village and the planning form of the courtyard reflects the principle of balance and symmetry. The quality of the space refers to the impact indicators of the physical and artificial environment of the space, including the physical environment, such as air quality, light, ventilation, noise, and the artificial environment, such as lighting, decoration, furniture, and facilities.
Figure 8d,e show the building’s warm and simple physical and artificial environment.
Figure 8f,g show the decorative details of the buildings, where the inhabitants would carve the building elements with auspicious symbolic patterns, both for aesthetic purposes and to represent good wishes for the family. The spatial relationship refers to the connection between spatial functional areas; the relationship between each space can be changed to meet different functional and spiritual needs. For example, the space adopts the concept of juxtaposition to gather its functions, strengthening the concentration of space that highlights the characteristics and focus. As in
Figure 8h,i, the staircase is the main passage connecting the second floor of the main house, the second floor of the side room, and the open space on the first floor. The tread at the main house’s entrance in
Figure 8h can also be used as a staircase handrail, reflecting one thing’s multi-purpose function.
Figure 8i shows that the entrance of the side room is slightly lower than the main house’s entrance. Usually, the main house is occupied by the parents, and the side house is occupied by the children, which reflects the influence of the family ritual system on the architectural pattern and spatial relationship.
3.1.2. Evaluation Analysis Matrix
In the design paradigm of three-dimensional structural analysis of vernacular architecture’s subjective–cultural–ecological design system, an evaluation matrix exists for analyzing the weight of spatial design factors. For example, V15 in
Table 1 reflects the evaluation and weighting analysis of the visual experience of the subject dimension on the combination of cultural and spatial factors. As shown in
Table 1, the matrix uses the five sensory factors of the subject dimension as the primary evaluation factors. It represents the multiple patterns of the mutual combination of cultural and spatial dimensions under the perspective of visual factors. Each pattern will set up relevant questions based on visual perception factors and score and rank them with satisfaction and care measurement scales. The evaluation matrix provides a transparent and standardized, reliable basis for the design requirements of the relevant spatial scale relationships and the weighting ratio of each scale factor.
Table 2 shows the residents’ preferences for selecting each functional space scale under visual factors. Based on the analysis of the table, it is possible to derive different functional space volumes and significant spatial demand influencing factors that meet the residents’ minds. At the same time, through further refinement of each model by this evaluation matrix, key evaluation factors corresponding to crucial elements of vernacular building space design can be analyzed to form a set database of design evaluation factors for vernacular buildings.
Take the “one seal” architectural form of the Wolong Ancient Fishing Village in Kunming. The “one seal” architectural form is typical of the traditional courtyard in Kunming. Because the layout and overall appearance of the building are similar to a square, the building is named “one seal.” The ancient fishing village of Wolong is near the sea, with a significant temperature difference between day and night. The architectural form of “one seal” is perfectly adapted to the local natural environment and lifestyle, forming a unique architectural form of the ancient fishing village, as shown in
Figure 9a. In addition, the plan layout of the “One Seal” building adopts the principle of central symmetry, reflecting the traditional Chinese cultural order of respect and inferiority. As shown in
Figure 9b, the main house faces south on the top of the longitudinal axis, while the side houses are located on the left and right sides, and the main door is opposite to the main house, forming a quadrangle with a courtyard in the middle. In this study, we conducted field surveys of 43 residential buildings in the ancient fishing village, as well as in-depth interviews and questionnaires with 135 residents. We learned that the current vernacular architectural form in the town has changed from the initial “one seal” architectural form to the “one seal” architectural form that changes with the needs of life. The fundamental spatial elements of the original “one seal” architecture include the main house, side houses, gates, courtyard, corridors, and stairwells. The new spatial layout corresponds to the new living needs of the inhabitants. The change in the architectural form of “one seal” implies that the interaction between residents’ perceptions and social culture has an inherent role in determining the form of vernacular architecture. Therefore, in this study, we analyze and study the fundamental relationship of the “one seal” building with 135 samples of data, taking the spatial demand of residents in the V15 model as an example. The results show that when the target group is the middle-aged and elderly (45 or above), the proportion of spatial scale of residents’ lifestyles under visual factors is ranked as follows: functional space > public space > private space. When the target group is young people (below 45), the proportion of residents’ spatial scale for lifestyle under visual factors is functional space > private space > public space, as shown in
Figure 10. This comparison clearly shows that the residents’ demand for functional space is the dominant reason for changing the essential spatial elements of the original “one seal” building. The pie chart in
Figure 11 shows that among the functional space needs, bathrooms/multipurpose rooms and kitchens are the main focus of residents. In addition, middle-aged and older adults are more concerned with arranging small vegetable/flower gardens and drainage systems in public spaces. In contrast, young people are more concerned with planning bedrooms in private rooms.
This study designed and planned the building layout based on the above analysis. As shown in
Figure 12, by comparing with the original building layout, it can be found that the first-floor plan layout of the partial rooms on both sides of the building has been adjusted with functional areas. The layout of the first floor of the left side room is divided into a wet and dry bathroom and a storage room. The bathroom is close to the main bedroom. It is separated by a staircase, which not only meets the conditions of convenient use for the elderly in the main bedroom but also avoids the problem of moisture return. At the same time, the space under the stairs can be used as a shelf for the entertainment room/dining room, making full use of the corner space, as shown in
Figure 13. The right side of the first floor includes the open dining/entertainment area and the kitchen. The kitchen is close to the front door, which solves grease and ventilation problems and facilitates the laying of sewer lines. In addition, the planning of the drainage system on the first floor reflects the traditional idea that “flowing water gathers wealth.” As shown in
Figure 14, the ground in the courtyard is provided with a drainage ditch based on the dripping of water from the corridor. The drainage system on the ground collects rainwater into the water purification system in the basement of the storage room on the left, where it is purified with domestic sewage and used as organic fertilizer for vegetables/gardens. The space on the second floor of the building mainly addresses the space needs of young people. The second floor of the main room was originally an oversized room. In order to make full use of space resources, we divided the second floor of the main room into three rooms, as shown in
Figure 15. The second floor directly above the main house is still used as a space for ancestor worship, and a small storage room is set up on the right side of the space connected to it, enriching the functional attributes of the space. On the left side is a separate bedroom space. On the second floor on the left are an independent bathroom and a small bedroom. The second-floor independent bathroom corresponds to the location of the first-floor bathroom, which is conducive to drainage system management. At the same time, the bathroom on the second floor is located between the two bedrooms, connecting the relationship between the two separate spaces while meeting the needs of young people who want to have their bathroom. On the right side, on the second floor of the side room, is a separate multi-purpose room. This room is DIY in nature, with the residents giving the space functional attributes and scale proportions, reflecting the normative and flexible characteristics of the subjective–cultural–ecological design system.
It is worth pointing out that the above case shows only one axis of perceptual factors of the subjective dimension of the evaluation analysis matrix. The single most striking observation to emerge from the data comparison is that each of the perceptual dimensions of the subject dimension is a system of methods that includes, from large to small, a collection of steps such as design purpose, design factors, design solutions, and design evaluation. The formation, generation, and development of these specific methods will provide more systematic and scientific theoretical support for the conservation and sustainable development of vernacular architecture.