The Role of Employees’ Technology Readiness, Job Meaningfulness and Proactive Personality in Adaptive Performance
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development
2.1. Adaptive Performance
2.2. Technology Readiness and Adaptive Performance
2.3. Technology Readiness, Job Meaningfulness and Adaptive Performance
2.4. Proactive Personality, Technology Readiness and Adaptive Performance
2.5. Theoretical Background
2.6. Conceptual Framework
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Sampling and Procedures
3.2. Measurement
4. Data Analysis and Results
4.1. Measurement Model Assessment
4.2. Structural Model Assessment
5. Discussion
6. Research Implications
7. Research Limitation
8. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Okkonen, J.; Vuori, V.; Palvalin, M. Digitalization Changing Work: Employees’ view on the benefits and hindrances. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology & Systems, Quito, Ecuador, 6–8 February 2019; Rocha, A., Ferras, C., Paredes, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 165–176. [Google Scholar]
- Rahi, S.; Ghani, M.A.; Ngah, A.H. Factors propelling the adoption of internet banking: The role of e-customer service, website design, brand image and customer satisfaction. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 2020, 33, 549–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, B. Companies That Failed at Digital Transformation and What We Can Learn from Them. 2019. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/blakemorgan/2019/09/30/companies-that-failed-at-digital-transformation-and-what-we-can-learn-from-them/?sh=393dc834603c (accessed on 1 November 2022).
- Akter, S.; Wamba, S.F.; Gunasekaran, A.; Dubey, R.; Childe, S.J. How to improve firm performance using big data analytics capability and business strategy alignment? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 182, 113–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Büyüközkan, G.; Göçer, F. An extension of ARAS methodology under interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment for digital supply chain. Appl. Soft Comput. 2018, 69, 634–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotera, Y.; Vione, K.C. Psychological impacts of the new ways of working (NWW): A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health 2020, 17, 5080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palazzeschi, L.; Bucci, O.; di Fabio, A. High entrepreneurship, leadership, and professionalism (HELP): A new resource for workers in the 21st century. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kane, G. The technology fallacy: People are the real key to digital transformation. Res. Technol. Manag. 2019, 62, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murawski, M.; Bick, M. Digital competences of the workforce—A research topic? Bus. Process Manag. J. 2017, 23, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadeem, M.; Gan, C.; Nguyen, C. Does intellectual capital efficiency improve firm performance in BRICS economies? A dynamic panel estimation. Meas. Bus. Excell. 2017, 21, 65–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sony, M.; Naik, S. Critical Factors for The Successful Implementation of Industry 4.0: A Review and Future Research Direction. Prod. Plan. Control 2020, 31, 799–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attaran, S.; Attaran, M.; Kirkland, D. Savoring the product: A look at the impact of AI on pre and post purchase satisfaction. Glob. Alliance Mark. Manag. Assoc. 2019, 614–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Park, S. Employee Adaptive Performance and Its Antecedents: Review and Synthesis. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2019, 18, 294–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van den Heuvel, M.; Demerouti, E.; Bakker, A.B.; Hetland, J.; Schaufeli, W.B. How do employees adapt to organizational change? The role of meaning-making and work engagement. Span. J. Psychol. 2020, 23, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parasuraman, A. Technology Readiness Index (Tri): A Multiple-Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies. J. Serv. Res. 2000, 2, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsikriktsis, N. A technology readiness-based taxonomy of customers: A replication and extension. J. Serv. Res. 2004, 7, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, Y.Y.; Shie, A.J.; Liu, Z.J. How service industry attract employee? Evidence from website quality. Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 2020, 36, 125–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, S.; Lee, P.C.; Law, R.; Hyun, S.S. An investigation of the moderating effects of current job position level and hotel work experience between technology readiness and technology acceptance. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 90, 102633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nor Hayati, K.; Norlina, M.N.; Jati, K.; Juliza, S.; Dealwis, C.; Muhamad Azim, N. Sustaining Job Performance through Technology Acceptance with Usage of Whatsapp Mobile Application. Int. J. Serv. Manag. Sustain. 2020, 5, 123–148. [Google Scholar]
- Stock, R.; Gross, M. How Does Knowledge Workers’ Social Technology Readiness Affect Their Innovative Work Behavior? In Proceedings of the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 2166–2175. [Google Scholar]
- Symon, G.; Whiting, R. The sociomaterial negotiation of social entrepreneurs’ meaningful work. J. Manag. Stud. 2019, 56, 655–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, T.; Hon, A.H.Y.; Crant, J.M. Proactive personality, employee creativity, and newcomer outcomes: A longitudinal study. J. Bus. Psychol. 2009, 24, 93–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hinton, M. Managing information in modern organizations. In Introducing Information Management; Routledge: London, UK, 2006; pp. 16–34. [Google Scholar]
- Hackman, J.R.; Oldham, G.R. Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. J. Appl. Psychol. 1975, 60, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aguinis, H.; Glavas, A. On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. J. Manag. 2019, 45, 1057–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazir, O.; Islam, J.U.; Rahman, Z. Effect of CSR participation on employee sense of purpose and experienced meaningfulness: A self-determination theory perspective. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 46, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pulakos, E.D.; Arad, S.; Donovan, M.A.; Plamondon, K.E. Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 2000, 85, 612–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kim, K.A. measure of adaptive performance and the DLOQ. Learn. Organ. 2020, 28, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenny, S.V. Employee Productivity and Organizational Performance: A Theoretical Perspective. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. 2019. Available online: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93294/ (accessed on 3 October 2022).
- Oesterreich, T.D.; Teuteberg, F. Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers Ind. 2016, 83, 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonekamp, L.; Sure, M. Consequences of Industry 4.0 on Human Labour and Work Organisation. J. Bus. Media Psychol. 2015, 6, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
- Paliyanny, H.; Kassim, U.K. The readiness in adapting and managing education 4.0: Management perspective. Int. J. Educ. Pedag. 2019, 1, 63–73. [Google Scholar]
- Vrchota, J.; Řehoř, P.; Maříková, M.; Pech, M. Critical success factors of the project management in relation to industry 4.0 for sustainability of projects. Sustainability 2020, 13, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alyoubi, B.; Yamin, M.A.Y. The Impact of Task Technology Fit on Employee Job Performance. Mark. Manag. Innov. 2019, 4, 140–159. [Google Scholar]
- Lokuge, S.; Sedera, D.; Grover, V.; Dongming, X. Organizational readiness for digital innovation: Development and empirical calibration of a construct. Inf. Manag. 2019, 56, 445–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.H.; Shih, H.Y.; Sher, P.J. Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model. Psychol. Mark. 2007, 24, 641–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blut, M.; Wang, C. Technology readiness: A meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2020, 48, 649–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aldunate, R.; Nussbaum, M. Teacher adoption of technology. Computers Hum. Behav. 2013, 29, 519–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirtas, O.; Hannah, S.T.; Gok, K.; Arslan, A.; Capar, N. The moderated influence of ethical leadership, via meaningful work, on followers’ engagement, organizational identification, and envy. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 145, 183–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frieder, R.E.; Wang, G.; Oh, I.S. Linking Job-Relevant Personality Traits, Transformational Leadership, and Job Performance via Perceived Meaningfulness at Work: A Moderated Mediation Model. J. Appl. Psychol. 2018, 103, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allan, B.A.; Duffy, R.D.; Collisson, B. Task Significance and Performance: Meaningfulness as a Mediator. J. Career Assess. 2018, 26, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, S.H.; Sung, M.; Suh, B. Linking meaningfulness to work outcomes through job characteristics and work engagement. Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 2020, 24, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bailey, C.; Lips-Wiersma, M.; Madden, A.; Yeoman, R.; Thompson, M.; Chalofsky, N. The five paradoxes of meaningful work: Introduction to the special issue ‘meaningful work: Prospects for the 21st century’. J. Manag. Stud. 2019, 56, 481–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steger, M.F.; Dik, B.J.; Duffy, R.D. Measuring meaningful work: The Work and Meaning Inventory (WAMI). J. Career Assess. 2012, 20, 322–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guevara, K.; Ord, J. The search for meaning in a changing work context. Futures 1996, 28, 709–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahn, W.A. Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Acad. Manag. J. 1990, 33, 692–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lips-Wiersma, M.; Morris, L. Discriminating between ‘meaningful work’ and the ‘management of meaning’. J. Bus. Ethics 2009, 88, 491–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vuori, T.; San, E.; Kira, M. Meaningfulness-making at work. Qual. Res. Organ. Manag. Int. J. 2012, 7, 231–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tims, M.; Derks, D.; Bakker, A.B. Job crafting and its relationships with person-job fit and meaningfulness: A three-wave study. J. Vocat. Behav. 2016, 92, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuck, B.; Ghosh, R.; Zigarmi, D.; Nimon, K. The Jingle Jangle of Employee Engagement: Further Exploration of the Emerging Construct and Implications for Workplace Learning and Performance. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2013, 12, 11–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Hirsh, J.B. Accepting lower salaries for meaningful work. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Henstra, C.T. Meaningful Work in the Digital Age. Master’s Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Uys, C. The Relationship between the Adoption of Technology, Employee Engagement and Psychological Meaningfulness. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kuper, H. Industry 4.0: Changes in work organization and qualification requirements—Challenges for academic and vocational education. Entrep. Education 2020, 3, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, L.; Wei, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, B.; Xu, Z. The influence of mistreatment by patients on job satisfaction and turnover intention among Chinese nurses: A three-wave survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health 2020, 17, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, H.C.; Kim, Y.E. The effects of corporate social responsibility on job performance: Moderating effects of authentic leadership and meaningfulness of work. J. Asian Finance Econ. Bus. 2018, 5, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Jin, H.; Chen, T. Linking proactive personality to creative performance: The role of job crafting and high-involvement work systems. J. Creat. Behav. 2020, 54, 196–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alikaj, A.; Ning, W.; Wu, B. Proactive Personality and Creative Behavior: Examining the Role of Thriving at Work and High-Involvement HR Practices. J. Bus. Psychol. 2020, 36, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant, A.M.; Ashford, S.J. The dynamics of proactivity at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 2008, 28, 3–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bateman, T.S.; Crant, J.M. The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. J. Organ. Behav. 1993, 14, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, S.K.; Bindl, U.K.; Strauss, K. Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. J. Manag. 2010, 36, 827–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerit, Y. The mediating effect of LMX in the relationship between school bureaucratic structure and teachers’ proactive behavior. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 2017, 38, 780–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, H.; Ye, B.H.; Xu, X. The cross-level effect of shared leadership on tourism employee proactive behavior and adaptive performance. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, C.C.; Ye, Y.-C.; Chen, M.-Y.; Chen, L.H. Proactive personality enhances change in employees’ job satisfaction: The moderating role of psychological safety. Aust. J. Manag. 2019, 44, 482–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Z. Proactive personality and career adaptability: The role of thriving at work. J. Vocat. Behav. 2017, 98, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCormick, B.W.; Guay, R.P.; Colbert, A.E.; Stewart, G.L. Proactive personality and proactive behaviour: Perspectives on person–situation interactions. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2019, 92, 30–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhu, Y.; He, W.; Wang, Y. Challenge—hindrance stress and academic achievement: Proactive personality as moderator. Soc. Behav. Personal. 2017, 45, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spitzmuller, M.; Sin, H.P.; Howe, M.; Fatimah, S. Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research: A meta-analytic review. Hum. Perform. 2015, 28, 351–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hobfoll, S.E. Conservation of Resources a New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. Am. Psychol. 1989, 44, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. Self-Determination Theory. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology; Van Lange, P.A.M., Kruglanski, A.W., Higgins, E.T., Eds.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 416–436. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 2000, 55, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martela, F.; Riekki, T.J. Autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence: A multicultural comparison of the four pathways to meaningful work. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychametrika 1984, 49, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolf, E.J.; Harrington, K.M.; Clark, S.L.; Miller, M.W. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2013, 73, 913–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parasuraman, A.; Colby, C.L. An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. J. Serv. Res. 2014, 18, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koopmans, L.; Bernaards, C.; Hildebrandt, V.; van Buuren, S.; van der Beek, A.J.; de Vet, H.C.W. Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 2013, 62, 6–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ringle, C.M.; Wende, S.; Becker, J.M. SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. 2015. Available online: http://www.smartpls.com (accessed on 17 August 2022).
- Chin, W.W.; Frye, T. PLS-Graph–Version 3.0 Soft Modelling Inc. 2003. Available online: http://www.plsgraph.com (accessed on 17 August 2022).
- Sarstedt, M.; Hair, J.F.; Cheah, J.H.; Becker, J.M.; Ringle, C.M. How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Aust. Mark. J. 2019, 27, 197–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tennenhaus, M.; Vinzi, V.E.; Chatelin, Y.; Lauro, C. PLS Path Modeling. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2005, 48, 159–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Sarstedt, M.; Hopkins, L.; Kuppelwieser, V.G. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool in Business Research. Eurasian Bus. Rev. 2014, 26, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hair, J.F.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Gudergan, S.P. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed.; Sage publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L.; Cai, X.; Yin, J. Effects of mentoring on work engagement: Work meaningfulness as a mediator. Int. J. Train. Dev. 2021, 25, 183–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budhiraja, S.; Rathi, N. Continuous learning during crises: Achieving change-efficacy, meaningful work and adaptive performance. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heyns, M.; McCallaghan, S.; Beukes, W. Work engagement and perceived customer value, the mediating role of meaningfulness through work. S. Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 2021, 24, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.C.; Liu, M.L.; Lin, C.P. Integrating technology readiness into the expectation-confirmation model: An empirical study of mobile services. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc.Netw. 2013, 16, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maan, A.T.; Abid, G.; Butt, T.H.; Ashfaq, F.; Ahmed, S. Perceived organizational support and job satisfaction: A moderated mediation model of proactive personality and psychological empowerment. Future Bus. J. 2020, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Bal, P.M.; Akhtar, M.N.; Long, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, Z. High-performance work system and employee performance: The mediating roles of social exchange and thriving and the moderating effect of employee proactive personality. Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour. 2019, 57, 369–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.H.; Deng, H.; Li, Y. Enhancing a sense of competence at work by engaging in proactive behavior: The role of proactive personality. J. Happiness Stud. 2018, 19, 801–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Construct | Indicator | Loading | AVE | CR |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adaptive Performance | AP1 | 0.852 | 0.700 | 0.949 |
AP2 | 0.844 | |||
AP3 | 0.834 | |||
AP4 | 0.834 | |||
AP5 | 0.832 | |||
AP6 | 0.834 | |||
AP7 | 0.837 | |||
AP8 | 0.825 | |||
Job Meaningfulness | JM1 | 0.810 | 0.708 | 0.949 |
JM2 | 0.869 | |||
JM3 | 0.789 | |||
JM4 | 0.873 | |||
JM5 | 0.880 | |||
JM6 | 0.833 | |||
JM7 | 0.832 | |||
Proactive Personality | PP1 | 0.831 | 0.638 | 0.946 |
PP2 | 0.813 | |||
PP3 | 0.808 | |||
PP4 | 0.75 | |||
PP5 | 0.825 | |||
PP6 | 0.624 | |||
PP7 | 0.857 | |||
PP8 | 0.855 | |||
PP9 | 0.803 | |||
PP10 | 0.793 | |||
Technology Readiness | I1 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0.952 |
I3 | 0.565 | |||
I4 | 0.688 | |||
I5 | 0.625 | |||
I6 | 0.529 | |||
I7 | 0.639 | |||
I8 | 0.585 | |||
I9 | 0.643 | |||
O1 | 0.777 | |||
O2 | 0.806 | |||
O3 | 0.735 | |||
O4 | 0.769 | |||
O5 | 0.752 | |||
O6 | 0.763 | |||
O7 | 0.813 | |||
O8 | 0.653 | |||
O9 | 0.811 | |||
O10 | 0.789 | |||
O11 | 0.727 | |||
O12 | 0.771 |
Adaptive Performance | Job Meaningfulness | Proactive Personality | Technology Readiness | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adaptive Performance | ||||
Job Meaningfulness | 0.734 | |||
Proactive Personality | 0.810 | 0.688 | ||
Technology Readiness | 0.679 | 0.549 | 0.692 |
Hypothesis | Relationship | Standard Beta | Standard Error | p-Value | LL | UL | Decision |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | Technology Readiness -> Adaptive Performance | 0.197 | 0.074 | 0.008 | 0.046 | 0.336 | Supported |
H2 | Technology Readiness -> Job Meaningfulness | 0.529 | 0.074 | 0.000 | 0.344 | 0.643 | Supported |
H3 | Job Meaningfulness -> Adaptive Performance | 0.720 | 0.157 | 0.000 | 0.376 | 1.003 | Supported |
H4 | Technology Readiness -> Job Meaningfulness -> Adaptive Performance | 0.381 | 0.086 | 0.000 | 0.190 | 0.532 | Supported |
H5 | Proactive personality -> Adaptive Performance | 0.906 | 0.169 | 0.000 | 0.551 | 1.223 | Supported |
H6 | Job Meaningfulness * Proactive Personality -> Adaptive Performance | 0.165 | 0.056 | 0.003 | 0.046 | 0.275 | Supported |
f2 | R Square | R Square Adjusted | Q2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adaptive Performance | 0.689 | 0.682 | 0.459 | |
Job Meaningfulness | 0.120 | 0.279 | 0.276 | 0.184 |
Proactive Personality | 0.156 | |||
Technology Readiness | 0.069 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Abdul Hamid, R. The Role of Employees’ Technology Readiness, Job Meaningfulness and Proactive Personality in Adaptive Performance. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315696
Abdul Hamid R. The Role of Employees’ Technology Readiness, Job Meaningfulness and Proactive Personality in Adaptive Performance. Sustainability. 2022; 14(23):15696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315696
Chicago/Turabian StyleAbdul Hamid, Roshayati. 2022. "The Role of Employees’ Technology Readiness, Job Meaningfulness and Proactive Personality in Adaptive Performance" Sustainability 14, no. 23: 15696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315696