University Incubator Support and Entrepreneurial Intention among Tourism Graduates: Mediating Role of Personal Attitude
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Development
2.1. Theory of Planned Behavior
2.2. Defining the Study Constructs
2.3. Network Support, Attitude, and Entrepreneurial Intention
2.4. Financial Support, Attitude, and Entrepreneurial Intention
2.5. Training Support, Attitude, and Entrepreneurial Intention
2.6. Attitude and Entrepreneurial Intention
2.7. The Mediating Impact of Personal Attitudes
3. Methods
3.1. Operationalization of the Study Constructs
3.2. Data Collection Procedures
3.3. Data Analysis Techniques
4. Results
4.1. The Respondents’ Characteristics
4.2. Psychometric Properties of the Employed Measures
4.3. The Tested Structural Model
4.4. Hypotheses Evaluation
5. Discussions
6. Conclusions and Further Research Opportunities
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- The Saudi Vision 2030. Progress and Achievements. Available online: https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/ (accessed on 1 September 2022).
- The Vision 2030 Achievements. Available online: https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/v2030/achievements/ (accessed on 1 September 2022).
- Aliedan, M.M.; Elshaer, I.A.; Alyahya, M.A.; Sobaih, A.E.E. Influences of University Education Support on Entrepreneurship Orientation and Entrepreneurship Intention: Application of Theory of Planned Behavior. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Mamary, Y.H.S.; Abdulrab, M.; Alwaheeb, M.A.; Alshammari, N.G.M. Factors impacting entrepreneurial intentions among university students in Saudi Arabia: Testing an integrated model of TPB and EO. Educ. Train. 2020, 62, 779–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Mamary, Y.H.; Alshallaqi, M. Impact of autonomy, innovativeness, risk-taking, proactiveness, and competitive aggressiveness on students’ intention to start a new venture. J. Innov. Knowl. 2022, 7, 100239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elshaer, I.A.; Sobaih, A.E.E. I Think I Can, I Think I Can: Effects of Entrepreneurship Orientation on Entrepreneurship Intention of Saudi Agriculture and Food Sciences Graduates. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobaih, A.E.E.; Elshaer, I.A. Structural Equation Modeling-Based Multi-Group Analysis: Examining the Role of Gender in the Link between Entrepreneurship Orientation and Entrepreneurial Intention. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobaih, A.E.E.; Elshaer, I.A. Personal Traits and Digital Entrepreneurship: A Mediation Model Using SmartPLS Data Analysis. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayatse, F.; Kwahar, N.; Akuraun, S. Business incubation process and firm performance: An empirical review. J. Glob. Entrep. Res. 2017, 7, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al-Mubaraki, H.; Wong, S.F. How valuable are business incubators? A case illustration of their performance indicators. In Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS2011), Athens, Greece, 30–31 May 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Hackett, S.M.; Dilts, D.M. A systematic review of business incubation research. J. Technol. Transf. 2004, 29, 55–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hughes, M.; Ireland, R.D.; Morgan, R.E. Stimulating dynamic value: Social capital and business incubation as a pathway to competitive success. Long Range Plan. 2007, 40, 154–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eshun, J.P. Business incubation as strategy. Bus. Strategy Ser. 2009, 10, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grimaldi, R.; Grandi, A. Business incubators and new venture creation: An assessment of incubating models. Technovation 2005, 25, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Von-Zedtwitz, M.; Grimaldi, R. Are service profiles incubator-specific? Results from an empirical investigation in Italy. J. Technol. Transf. 2006, 31, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Somsuk, N.; Laosirihongthong, T. A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: Resource-based view. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2014, 85, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, C.; Kendrick, R.C.; Samuelson, D.S. Stalking the latent entrepreneur: Business incubators and economic development. Econ. Dev. Rev. 1985, 3, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
- Smilor, R.W. Managing the incubator system: Critical success factors to accelerate new company development. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 1987, 34, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Policy Brief on Incubators and Accelerators that Support Inclusive Entrepreneurship; OECD: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Jenyo, B.O. Entrepreneurship Business Incubation Programe and Performance of Startups in Nigeria Universities; Kwara State University: Malete, Nigeria, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Lynn, L.H.; Reddy, N.M.; Aram, J.D. Linking technology and institutions: The innovation community framework. Res Policy 1996, 25, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, N.; Li, C.; Qalati, S.A.; Khan, A.; Siddiqui, F. Role of Business Incubators as a Service Provider in Entrepreneurship Development. J. Entrep. Organiz. Manag. 2020, 9, 279. [Google Scholar]
- Kajlkawa, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Sakata, I.; Matsushima, K. Multiscale Analysis of Interfirm Networks in Regional Clusters. Technovation 2010, 30, 168–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johannisson, B. Networking and Entrepreneurial Growth. In Handbook of Entrepreneurship; Sexton, D.L., Landstrom, H., Eds.; Blackwell Publishing: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 368–386. [Google Scholar]
- Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1998, 23, 660–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owen-Smith, J.; Riccaboni, M.; Pammolli, F.; Powell, W.W. A Comparison of U.S. and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Sciences. Manag. Sci. 2002, 48, 24–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Powell, W.; White, D.; Koput, K.W.; Owen-Smith, J. Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences. Am. J. Sociol. 2005, 110, 1132–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collinson, S.; Gregson, G. Knowledge Networks for New Technology-Based Firms: An International Comparison of Local Entrepreneurship Promotion. R D Manag. 2003, 33, 189–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Njau, J.M.; Wachira, A.W.; Mwenda, L.K.M. Effect of Access to Networks Support Provided by Business Incubators on Technology Based New Venture Creation in Kenya. Int. J. Entrep. Proj. Manag. 2019, 4, 33–50. [Google Scholar]
- Cui, Y.; Zha, L.; Zhang, F. Financial Support System and Strategy of SMEs in the Incubation Based on Business Life Cycle. Int. Bus. Res. 2010, 3, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gozali, L.; Masrom, M.; Haron, H.; Zagloel, Y. A Framework of Successful E-Business Incubator for Indonesian Public Universities. Asian J. Technol. Manag. 2016, 8, 118–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pittaway, L.; Cope, J. Entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of the evidence. Int. Small Bus. J. 2007, 25, 477–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shapero, A.; Sokol, L. The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship. In The Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship; Kent, C., Sexton, D., Vesper, K.H., Eds.; Englewood Cliffs: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1982; pp. 72–90. [Google Scholar]
- McClelland, D.C. N-achievement and entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1965, 1, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibb, A.A. Education for Enterprise: Training for Small Business Initiation—Some Contrasts. J. Small Bus. Entrep. 1987, 4, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, N.; Jamil, F.; Yasir, N. Role of Business Incubators in Entrepreneurship Development in Pakistan. City Univ. Res. J. 2016, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
- Mustikawati, I.; Bachtiar, M. Hubungan Antar DukunganSosial (Orang Tua) Dengan Minat Berwirausaha Pada SiswaSekolah Menengah Kejuruan; Fakultas Psikologi dan Ilmu Sosial Budaya, Universitas Islam Indonesia: Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Maina, R.W. Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions among Kenyan college graduates. KCA. J. Bus. Manag. 2011, 3, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Pribadi, H. Defining and constructing the teaching model of entrepreneur education based on entrepreneurial intention model. J. Tek. Ind. 2012, 7, 76–82. [Google Scholar]
- Tarapuez, E.; Guzmán-Díaz, B.E.; Parra-Hernández, R. Intenciónemprendedora y aspectossociodemográficosen Colombia. Rev. Espac. 2018, 39, 18. [Google Scholar]
- Teixeira, S.; Lopes-Casteleiro, C.; Rodrigues, R.; Guerra, M. Entrepreneurial intentions and entrepreneurship in European countries. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 2018, 10, 22–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinwale, Y.; Ababtain, A.; Alaraif, A. Structural equation model analysis of factors infuencing entrepreneurial interest among university students in Saudi Arabia. J. Entrep. Educ. 2019, 22, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Santos, S.C.; Liguori, E.W. Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intentions: Outcome expectations as mediator and subjective norms as moderator. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2019, 26, 400–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carsrud, A.L.; Krueger, N.F.; Reilly, M.D. Competing models of entrepreneurial. J. Bus. Ventur. 2000, 15, 411–432. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, E.R. Individual entrepreneurial intent: Construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2009, 33, 669–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bello, B.; Mattana, V.; Loi, M. The power of peers: A new look at the impact of creativity, social context and self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intentions. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2018, 24, 214–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aure, P.A.H.; Dui, R.P.; Jimenez, S.V.; Daradar, D.D.; Gutierrez, A.N.A.; Blasa, A.C.; Sy-Changco, J. Understanding social entrepreneurial intention through social cognitive career theory: A partial least squares structural equation modelling approach. Organ. Mark. Emerg. Econ. 2019, 10, 92–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.C.; Greene, P.G.; Crick, A. Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? J. Bus. Ventur. 1998, 13, 295–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liñán, F.; Chen, Y.W. Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2009, 33, 593–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souitaris, V.; Zerbinati, S.; Al-Laham, A. Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. J. Bus. Ventur. 2007, 22, 566–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schultz, P.W.; Oskamp, S. Effort as a moderator of the attitude behaviour relationship: General environmental concern and recycling. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1996, 59, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, P.B.; Stimpson, D.V.; Huefner, J.C.; Slater, J. An attitude approach to prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrep. Theory Pract. 1991, 15, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- French, D.P.; Sutton, S.R.; Hennings, S.J.; Mitchell, J.; Wareham, N.J.; Griffin, S.; Hardeman, W.; Kinmonth, A.L. The importance of affective beliefs and attitudes in the theory of planned behavior: Predicting intentions to increase physical activity. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2005, 35, 1824–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goethner, M.; Obschonka, M.; Silbereisen, R.K.; Cantner, U. Approaching the Agora: Determinants of Scientists’ Intentions to Purse Academic Entrepreneurship. In Working Paper No. 2009, 079; Friedrich Schiller University: Jena, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandes, T.; Proença, J. Reassessing relationships in consumer markets: Emotion, cognition, and consumer relationship intention. J. Relatsh. Mark. 2013, 12, 41–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ajzen, I. Attitudes, Traits, and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Personality and Social Psychology. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology; Berkowitz, L., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 1–63. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychol. Health 2011, 26, 1113–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Pettersen, I.B.; Aarstad, J.; Hovig, O.S.; Tobiassen, A.E. Business incubation and the network resources of start-ups. J. Innov. Entrep. 2016, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alpenidze, O.; Pauceanu, A.M. Key Success Factors for Business Incubators In Europe: An Empirical Study. Acad. Entrep. J. 2019, 25, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Dee, N.; Gill, D.; Lacher, R.; Livesey, F.; Minshall, T. A Review of Research on the Role and Effectiveness of Business Incubation for High-Growth Start-Ups. University of Cambridge Centre for Technology Management Working Paper Series. 2012. Available online: http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/ctm/publications/w_papers/ (accessed on 9 October 2022).
- Kuryan, N.; Khan, M.S.; Gustafsson, V. Born global and business incubators: A case analysis. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2018, 26, 490–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armellini, F.; Dega, C.; Garcia, A.; Machado, F. Techno-Entrepreneurship Development Support in Theory and Practice: The case of incubators and accelerators in Canada. In Handbook of Research on Techno-Entrepreneurship, 3rd ed.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2019; pp. 125–155. [Google Scholar]
- Myint, Y.M.S.; Vyakarnam, S.; Huener, A. Serial Entrepreneurs as ‘Incubators’: Individuals with Inspiration and Leadership that Make for Incubation. In Research Handbook of International Talent Management; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Cavazos-Arroyo, J.; Puente-Díaz, R.; Agarwal, N. An examination of certain antecedents of social entrepreneurial intentions among Mexico residents. Rev. Bras. Gestão Neg. 2017, 19, 180–199. [Google Scholar]
- Vinothkumar, M.; Subramanian, S. Self-efficacy, attitude and subjective norms as predictorsof youth’s intention to enlist in defense services. J. Indian Acad. Appl. Psychol. 2016, 42, 310–319. [Google Scholar]
- Yap, S.F.; Orthman, M.N.; Wee, Y.G. Comparing theories to explain exercise behaviour: A sociocognitive approach. Int. J. Health Promot. Educ. 2013, 51, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tshikovhi, N.; Shambare, R. Entrepreneurial knowledge, personal attitudes, and entrepreneurship intentions among South African Enactus students. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2015, 13, 152–158. [Google Scholar]
- Utami, C.W. Attitude, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behaviour, Entrepreneurship Education and Self efficacy toward Entrepreneurial Intention University Student in Indonesia. Eur. Res. Stud. J. 2017, 20, 475–495. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, P.; Wang, D.D.; Owen, C.L. A study of entrepreneurial intention of university students. Entrep. Res. J. 2015, 5, 61–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siu, W.; Lo, E.S. 2013. Cultural Contingency in the Cognitive Model of Entrepreneurial Intention. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2013, 37, 147–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour, 2nd ed.; Open University Press: Berkshire, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behaviour. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology; Lange, P.A.M., Kruglanski, A.W., Higgins, E.T., Eds.; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2012; pp. 438–459. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: A commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araujo-Soares. Health Psychol. Rev. 2014, 9, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lukes, M.; Longo, M.C.; Zouhar, J. Do business incubators really enhance entrepreneurial growth? Evidence from a large sample of innovative Italian start-ups. Technovation 2019, 82, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Matthews, L.M.; Matthews, R.L.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated Guidelines on Which Method to Use. Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal. 2017, 1, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krejcie, R.V.; Morgan, D.W. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1970, 30, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armstrong, J.S.; Terry, S.O. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Mark. Res. 1977, 14, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Salancik, G.R.; Jeffrey, P. An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. Adm. Sci. Q. 1977, 22, 427–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryman, A.; Cramer, D. Quantitative Data Analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 & 19: A Guide for Social Scientists; Routledge: London, UK, 2011; ISBN 9780203180990. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabachnick, B.G.; Fidell, L.S.; Ullman, J.B. Multivariate Statistics; Pearson: Boston, MA, USA, 2007; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, X.; Lynch, J.G., Jr.; Chen, Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. J. Consum. Res. 2010, 37, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Profile | N | Frequencies | Percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
University | King Faisal University | 750 | 162 | 21.6% |
King Saud University | 141 | 18.8% | ||
King Abdulaziz University | 135 | 18% | ||
Umm Al Qura University | 138 | 18.4% | ||
University of Tabuk | 99 | 13.2% | ||
Jazan University | 75 | 10% | ||
Gender | Male | 750 | 407 | 54.3% |
Female | 343 | 45.7% | ||
Age | Below 21 years | 750 | 84 | 11.2% |
21– 25 years | 496 | 66.1% | ||
25 years and above | 170 | 22.7% |
Factors and Items | Standardized Factor Loading | T-Value | M | S. D | Skewness | Kurtosis | Psychometric Properties |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Personal Attitude (Ajzen, 2011) [58] | a = 0.969, CR = 0.979, AVE = 0.904, MSV = 0.089 | ||||||
PA_1 | 0.960 | b* | 3.66 | 1.284 | −0.553 | −0.855 | |
PA_2 | 0.962 | 65.698 | 3.65 | 1.281 | 0.536 | 0.863 | |
PA_3 | 0.944 | 59.121 | 3.62 | 1.299 | 0.505 | 0.932 | |
PA_4 | 0.944 | 59.191 | 3.62 | 1.311 | −0.524 | −0.913 | |
PA_5 | 0.944 | 58.926 | 3.62 | 1.340 | 0.551 | 0.938 | |
Entrepreneurship intention (Chen et al.,1998; Liñán& Chen, 2009) [49,50] | a = 0.956, CR = 0.955, AVE = 0.781, MSV = 0.007 | ||||||
EI_1 | 0.774 | b | 3.39 | 1.006 | −0.551 | −0.043 | |
EI_2 | 0.848 | 26.140 | 3.29 | 1.137 | 0.465 | 0.288 | |
EI_3 | 0.814 | 24.782 | 3.23 | 1.140 | −0.336 | −0.544 | |
EI_4 | 0.960 | 30.879 | 3.16 | 1.209 | 0.343 | −0.586 | |
EI_5 | 0.941 | 30.050 | 3.05 | 1.242 | −0.316 | −0.760 | |
EI_6 | 0.948 | 30.384 | 3.06 | 1.243 | 0.348 | 0.734 | |
Networking support (Njau et al., 2019) [30] | a = 0.935, CR = 0.983, AVE = 0.905, MSV = 0.250 | ||||||
NS_1 | 0.944 | b | 3.78 | 1.288 | −0.934 | −0.188 | |
NS_2 | 0.969 | 62.363 | 3.71 | 1.286 | −0.858 | −0.333 | |
NS_3 | 0.969 | 62.399 | 3.71 | 1.285 | 0.858 | 0.284 | |
NS_4 | 0.939 | 53.450 | 3.72 | 1.291 | −0.900 | −0.247 | |
NS_5 | 0.942 | 54.289 | 3.69 | 1.301 | −0.838 | −0.361 | |
Financial Support (Gozali et al., 2015) [32] | a = 0.947, CR = 0.979, AVE = 0.919, MSV = 0.089 | ||||||
FS_1 | 0.983 | b | 3.63 | 1.218 | −0.510 | −0.863 | |
FS_2 | 0.929 | 61.308 | 3.60 | 1.233 | 0.511 | 0.860 | |
FS_3 | 0.942 | 66.878 | 3.64 | 1.215 | −0.516 | −0.854 | |
FS_4 | 0.980 | 95.708 | 3.60 | 1.240 | 0.522 | 0.847 | |
Training support (Lukes et al., 2019) [76] | a = 0.901, CR = 0.986, AVE = 0.934, MSV = 0.081 | ||||||
TS_1 | 0.963 | b | 3.84 | 1.156 | −0.777 | −0.259 | |
TS_2 | 0.967 | 70.779 | 3.85 | 1.157 | 0.786 | 0.250 | |
TS_3 | 0.967 | 70.766 | 3.85 | 1.157 | −0.786 | −0.250 | |
TS_4 | 0.965 | 69.265 | 3.84 | 1.157 | 0.774 | 0.268 | |
TS_5 | 0.970 | 72.134 | 3.85 | 1.159 | −0.779 | −0.268 |
Factors | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-Attitude | 0.951 | ||||
2-Networking support | 0.401 | 0.951 | |||
3-Financial support | 0.298 | 0.159 | 0.959 | ||
4-Training support | 0.180 | 0.278 | 0.285 | 0.966 | |
5-Entrepreneurship intentions | 0.33 | 0.053 | 0.083 | 0.491 | 0.884 |
Hypotheses | Results | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(β) | (T-Value) | SMC | Hypotheses Results | ||
H1 | Network Support ⟶ Attitude | 0.43 *** | 9.587 | Supported | |
H2 | Network Support ⟶ Entrepreneurship ⟶ intention | 0.29 *** | 2.689 | Supported | |
H3 | Financial Support ⟶ Attitude | 0.35 *** | 6.541 | Supported | |
H4 | Financial Support ⟶ Entrepreneurship intention | 0.10 | 1.610 | Not Supported | |
H5 | Training support ⟶ Attitude | 0.33 *** | 5.878 | Supported | |
H6 | Training support ⟶ Entrepreneurship intention | 0.09 | 1.291 | Not Supported | |
H7 | Attitude ⟶ Entrepreneurship intention | 0.52 *** | 12.278 | ||
H8 | Network Support ⟶ Attitude ⟶ Entrepreneurship intention | Path 1: β = 0.34 *** t-value = 9.587 Path 2: β = 0.52 *** t-value = 12.278 | Supported | ||
H9 | Financial Support ⟶ Attitude ⟶ Entrepreneurship intention | Path 1: β = 0.35 *** t-value = 6.541 Path 2: β = 0.52 *** t-value = 12.278 | Supported | ||
H10 | Training Support ⟶ Attitude ⟶ Entrepreneurship intention | Path 1: β = 0.33 *** t-value = 5.878 Path 2: β = 0.52 *** t-value = 12.278 | Supported | ||
Attitude | 0.42 | ||||
Entrepreneurship intention | 0.38 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ayad, T.; Sobaih, A.E.E.; Elshaer, I.A. University Incubator Support and Entrepreneurial Intention among Tourism Graduates: Mediating Role of Personal Attitude. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316045
Ayad T, Sobaih AEE, Elshaer IA. University Incubator Support and Entrepreneurial Intention among Tourism Graduates: Mediating Role of Personal Attitude. Sustainability. 2022; 14(23):16045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316045
Chicago/Turabian StyleAyad, Tamer, Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih, and Ibrahim A. Elshaer. 2022. "University Incubator Support and Entrepreneurial Intention among Tourism Graduates: Mediating Role of Personal Attitude" Sustainability 14, no. 23: 16045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316045
APA StyleAyad, T., Sobaih, A. E. E., & Elshaer, I. A. (2022). University Incubator Support and Entrepreneurial Intention among Tourism Graduates: Mediating Role of Personal Attitude. Sustainability, 14(23), 16045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316045