Next Article in Journal
Wave Power Density Hotspot Distribution and Correlation Pattern Exploration in the Gulf of Mexico
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Political Connections on Corporate Green Innovation: The Mediating Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Moderating Effect of Environmental Public Opinion
Previous Article in Journal
The Impacts of Tourism Stays on Residents’ Self-Reported Health: A Pan-European Analysis on the Role of Age and Urbanization Level
Previous Article in Special Issue
Does Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Corporate Risk-Taking? Evidence from Emerging Economy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Social Innovation: Field Analysis and Gaps for Future Research

by
Jaiarys Capa Bataglin
* and
Isak Kruglianskas
School of Economics, Business and Accounting of USP (FEA/USP), University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1153; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031153
Submission received: 18 November 2021 / Revised: 6 December 2021 / Accepted: 9 December 2021 / Published: 20 January 2022

Abstract

Scientific publications on social innovation and interest in the subject have grown substantially in the last decade, evidencing the need for more studies in this direction. This study aimed to map the scientific publications and intellectual structure in the field of social innovation, through a bibliometric study. The bibliometric survey specifically considered the period 2006–2021, through data indexed by the SCOPUS database, which included journals with a high impact factor. A total of 1192 articles were analyzed using the software VOSviewer (VOS) 1.6.15, to graphically map the material. The results showed explosive growth in the academic literature on social innovation in the last decade; moreover, they allowed the identification of the main authors, articles, topics, institutions, and countries in the field. From the analyses, a theoretical framework structured with four main emphases (clusters) was evidenced: (1) social entrepreneurship and the third sector; (2) strategic management and innovation; (3) sociopolitical aspects, urban development, and governance; and (4) innovation and sustainability.
Keywords: social innovation; social entrepreneurship; innovation; urban development; sustainability social innovation; social entrepreneurship; innovation; urban development; sustainability

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bataglin, J.C.; Kruglianskas, I. Social Innovation: Field Analysis and Gaps for Future Research. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031153

AMA Style

Bataglin JC, Kruglianskas I. Social Innovation: Field Analysis and Gaps for Future Research. Sustainability. 2022; 14(3):1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031153

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bataglin, Jaiarys Capa, and Isak Kruglianskas. 2022. "Social Innovation: Field Analysis and Gaps for Future Research" Sustainability 14, no. 3: 1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031153

APA Style

Bataglin, J. C., & Kruglianskas, I. (2022). Social Innovation: Field Analysis and Gaps for Future Research. Sustainability, 14(3), 1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031153

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop