Analysis of Agricultural CO2 Emissions in Henan Province, China, Based on EKC and Decoupling
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Method
3.1. Study Area
3.2. Estimation and Data Source of Agricultural CO2 Emissions
3.3. EKC Hypothesis and Model Specification
3.4. Decoupling Index
4. Results
4.1. Results of Agricultural CO2 Emission Estimation
4.2. Results of CO2 EKC Fitting
4.3. Results of Decoupling Analysis
4.4. Results of Integrating EKC with Decoupling
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wilschut, R.A.; Geisen, S.; Martens, H.; Kostenko, O.; de Hollander, M.; ten Hooven, F.C.; Celik, T. Latitudinal Variation in Soil Nematode Communities under Climate Warming -Related Range-Expanding and Native Plants. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 25, 2714–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grossman, G.M.; Krueger, A.B. Economic Growth and the Environment. Q. J. Econ. 1995, 110, 353–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth. SG/SD(2002)1/FINAL. Available online: http://www.oecd.org/env/indicators-modelling-outlooks/1933638.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2021).
- Azomahou, T.; Laisney, F.; Van, P.N. Economic Development and CO2 Emissions: A Nonparametric Panel Approach. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ. 2005, 90, 1347–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sarkodie, S.A.; Strezov, V. A Review on Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Using Bibliometric and Meta-Analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 128–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Knudsen, M.T.; Meyer-Aurich, A.; Olesen, J.E.; Chirinda, N.; Hermansen, J.E. Carbon Footprints of Crops from Organic and Conventional Arable Crop Rotations-Using A Life Cycle Assessment Approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 64, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanali, M.; Movahedi, M.; Yousefi, M.; Jahangiri, S.; Khoshnevisan, B. Investigating Energy Balance and Carbon Footprint in Saffron Cultivation: A Case Study in Iran. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 115, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahsan, F.; Chandio, A.A.; Fang, W. Climate Change Impacts on Cereal Crops Production in Pakistan. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manage. 2020, 12, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koondhar, M.A.; Aziz, N.; Tan, Z.; Yang, S.; Abbasi, K.R.; Kong, R. Green Growth of Cereal Food Production under the Constraints of Agricultural Carbon Emissions: A New Insights from ARDL and VECM Models. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 47, 101452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Food Security and Agricultural Mitigation in Developing Countries: Options for Capturing Synergies. 2009. Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i1318e/i1318e00.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2021).
- Koondhar, M.A.; Qiu, L.; Li, H.; Liu, W.; He, G. A Nexus between Air Pollution, Energy Consumption and Growth of Economy: A Comparative Study between the USA and China-based on the ARDL Bound Testing Approach. Agric. Econ. 2018, 64, 265–276. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, S.; He, K.; Zhang, J. The More Grain Production, the More Fertilizers Pollution? Empirical Evidence from Major Grain-producing Areas in China. China Rural Econ. 2020, 1, 108–131. [Google Scholar]
- Zaman, K.; Moemen, M.A. Energy Consumption, Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Economic Development: Evaluating Alternative and Plausible Environmental Hypothesis for Sustainable Growth. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 74, 1119–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Mulali, U.; Ozturk, I. The Investigation of Environmental Kuznets curve Hypothesis in the Advanced Economies: The Role of Energy Prices. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 54, 1622–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apergis, N.; Ozturk, I. Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Asian Countries. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 52, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, M.M.; Murad, M.W.; Noman, A.H.M.; Ozturk, I. Relationships among Carbon Emissions, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and Population Growth: Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 70, 466–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, A.; Zhao, Y.; Shahbaz, M.; Bano, S.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y. Carbon Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: An Aggregate and Disaggregate Analysis of the Indian Economy. Energy Policy 2016, 96, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkodie, S.A.; Strezov, V. Assessment of Contribution of Australia’s Energy Production to CO2 Emissions and Environmental Degradation Using Statistical Dynamic Approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 639, 888–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- William, R.M.; Gregory, C.U. Are Environmental Kuznets Curves Misleading Us? The Case of CO2 Emissions. Environ. Dev. Econ. 1997, 2, 451–463. [Google Scholar]
- Sui, J.; Lv, W. Crop Production and Agricultural Carbon Emissions: Relationship Diagnosis and Decomposition Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farhani, S.; Ozturk, I. Causal Relationship between CO2 Emissions, Real GDP, Energy Consumption, Financial Development, Trade Openness, and Urbanization in Tunisia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 15663–15676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.; Li, S.C.; Shui, W. Study on Carbon Footprint of Agro-Ecosystem in Southwest China based on EKC Model. J. Agro-Tech. Econ. 2013, 2, 120–128. [Google Scholar]
- Friedl, B.; Getzner, M. Determinants of CO2 Emissions in a Small Open Economy. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 45, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, R.R.; Moran, E.F. Turning the Curve: A Critical Review of Kuznets Approaches. Appl. Geog. 2012, 32, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, N.; Du, L.; Lu, J.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Muhammad, Z.H. Modelling the CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth in Croatia: Is There Any Environmental Kuznets Curve? Energy 2017, 123, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, K.; Sun, R.; Jiang, H.; Zeng, X. CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve in China: What Roles Can Nuclear Energy and Renewable Energy Play? J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 196, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Jiang, Q.; Lv, J. Economic Growth and Food Safety: FKC Hypothesis Test and Policy Implications. Econ. Res. 2019, 11, 180–194. [Google Scholar]
- Cui, X.; Han, M.; Fang, Z. Inverted “U”-shape of EKC with Dynamic Evolution Trend. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2019, 29, 74–82. [Google Scholar]
- Lei, J.; Su, S.; Yu, W.; Sun, X. Temporal and Spatial Pattern Evolution and Grouping Prediction of Nonpoint Source Pollution of Chemical Fertilizers in China. China J. Eco-Agric. 2020, 28, 1079–1092. [Google Scholar]
- Sarkodie, S.A.; Strezov, V. Empirical Study of the Environmental Kuznets Curve and Environmental Sustainability Curve Hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana, and USA. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 201, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Q.; Chen, Y. The Enlightenment of Chinese Agricultural EKC in Rural Revitalization. J. Agri. Sci. 2019, 40, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
- Shang, J.; Li, X.; Deng, Y. Analysis of the Relationship between Agricultural Economic Growth and Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution based on EKC: Taking Heilongjiang Provinceas An Example. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 33, 157–160. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, M.; Ma, L.; Qiao, J. Discussion on the Relationship between Agricultural Economic Growth and Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution in Henan Province: Empirical Analysis based on EKC Theory. J. Henan Univ. 2021, 51, 12–19. [Google Scholar]
- Tapio, P. Towards A Theory of Decoupling: Degrees of Decoupling in the EU and the Case of Road Traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transp. Policy 2005, 12, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vehmas, J.V.; Luukkanen, J.; Kaivo-Oja, J. Linking Analyses and Environmental Kuznets Curves for Aggregated Material Flows in the EU. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15, 1662–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Wang, H.; Qin, S. Analysis of Decoupling Effect and Driving Factors of Agricultural Carbon Emission: A Case Study of Heilongjiang Province. Sci. Technol. Manag. Res. 2019, 17, 247–252. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth; A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 2011; pp. 1–174. [Google Scholar]
- Lv, D.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Y. Sustainability Assessment based on Integrating EKC with Decoupling: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, Y.; Zhong, M. Relationship between EKC Hypothesis and the Decoupling of Environmental Pollution from Economic Development: Based on Decoupling Partition of China Prefecture-Level Cities. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2016, 26, 8–16. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, Y.; Chen, C. Research on the Compensation Mechanism of Agricultural Carbon Emission Reduction in China from the Perspective of Combination of Market and Government. Issues Agric. 2021, 5, 121–136. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, Y.; Zhang, J. Differentiation of Net Carbon Effect of Agricultural Production in China. J. Nat. Resour. 2013, 8, 1298–1309. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, L.; Tian, Y. Agricultural Carbon Reduction Potential and Its Spatial Correlation in China: A Spatial Durbin Model Based on Spatial Weight Matrix. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2015, 6, 53–61. [Google Scholar]
- Li, B.; Zhang, J.; Li, H. Research on Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Affecting Factors Decomposition of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in China. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2011, 21, 80–86. [Google Scholar]
- Li, N.; Wei, C.; Zhang, H.; Cai, C.; Song, M.; Miao, J. Drivers of the National and Regional Crop Production-Derived Greenhouse Gas Emissions in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 257, 120503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- David, I.S. The Rise and Fall of the EnvironmentalKuznets Curve. World Dev. 2004, 32, 1419–1439. [Google Scholar]
- Selden, T.M.; Song, D.Q. Environmental Quality and Development: Is there a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1994, 27, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Environment Agency. Annual European Union Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2010 and Inventory Report 2012 Submission to the UNFCCC Secretariat; EEA-European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2012; ISSN 1725–2237. [Google Scholar]
- Silvia, C.; Roberto, E. Is There A Long-Term Relationship between Agricultural GHG Emissions and Productivity Growth? A Dynamic Panel Data Approach. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2014, 58, 273–302. [Google Scholar]
- Zong, Y.; Cui, H. How to Embed Environmenral Regulation into Agricultural Policy: Experience of EU’S Cross-Compliance System. World Agric. 2022, 1, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, R.; Jiang, Z. Transverse Space Ecological Compensation of Low-Carbon Agriculture in China. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2018, 28, 87–97. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, H.; He, Y.; Huang, H.; Chen, W. Spatial Effect and Influencing Factors of China’s Agricultural Carbon Compensation Rate based on Spatial Durbin model. J. Agro-Tech. Econ. 2020, 3, 110–123. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, K.; Lu, Y.; Jin, L. Rural Household’s Willingness to Participate in Market-based Eco-Compensation Programs and its Determinant Factors. Chin. J. Agric. Resour. Reg. Plan. 2021, 42, 192–199. [Google Scholar]
Variables | Obs. | S.D. | Mean | Min. | Max. | Data Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20 | 0.239 | 7.041 | 6.645 | 7.393 | China Rural Statistical Yearbook (2001–2020) | |
20 | 0.287 | 7.593 | 7.142 | 8.037 | Henan Statistical Yearbook (2001–2020) |
Decoupling Degrees | Environmental Pressure | Economic Growth | DI | Features |
---|---|---|---|---|
Expansive coupling | > 0 | > 0 | DI > 1 | Economy grows while the environment rapidly deteriorates. |
Strong coupling | > 0 | < 0 | DI < 0 | Economy shrinks and the environment deteriorates. |
Weak coupling | < 0 | < 0 | 0 < DI < 1 | Economic recession is faster than the rate of the environmental improvement. |
Weak decoupling | > 0 | > 0 | 0 < DI < 1 | Economic growth is faster than the rate of environmental degradation. |
Strong decoupling | < 0 | > 0 | DI < 0 | Environmental pressure declines with a rise in economy. |
Recessive decoupling | < 0 | < 0 | DI > 1 | Economy shrinks while the environment improves. |
Variable | Inspection Type | ADF Test | Critical Values at Different Levels of Significance | p Value | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(c,t,q) | Statistics | 1% | 5% | 10% | |||
(c,0,3) | −1.613 | −3.920 | −3.066 | −2.673 | 0.453 | Nonstationary | |
(c,0,3) | 1.007 | −3.920 | −3.066 | −2.673 | 0.994 | Nonstationary | |
(c,0,3) | −2.686 | −3.920 | −3.066 | −2.673 | 0.098 | Stationary | |
(c,0,3) | −3.949 | −3.920 | −3.066 | −2.673 | 0.010 | Stationary |
Null Hypothesis | F-Statistics | p Value | Results |
---|---|---|---|
is not Granger reason for | 3.268 | 0.090 | Rejected |
is not Granger reason for | 0.001 | 0.978 | Accepted |
Variables | Model (1) | Model (2) | Model (3) |
---|---|---|---|
Constant term | 0.888 ** (2.639) | −28.519 *** (–3.862) | 117.668 (0.451) |
0.810 *** (18.303) | 8.588 *** (4.399) | −49.338 (−0.477) | |
−0.514 *** (−3.985) | 7.131 (0.522) | ||
−0.336 (−0.560) | |||
Adjusted R2 | 0.946 | 0.971 | 0.969 |
F-statistic | 334.986 (0.000) | 313.890 (0.000) | 200.916 (0.000) |
Year | ΔC | ΔG | DI | Decoupling States |
---|---|---|---|---|
2000–2001 | 0.029 | 0.054 | 0.540 | Weak decoupling |
2001–2002 | 0.048 | 0.049 | 0.987 | Weak decoupling |
2002–2003 | −0.075 | −0.096 | 0.781 | Weak coupling |
2003–2004 | 0.085 | 0.188 | 0.452 | Weak decoupling |
2004–2005 | 0.237 | 0.077 | 3.078 | Expansive coupling |
2005–2006 | 0.047 | 0.081 | 0.579 | Weak decoupling |
2006–2007 | 0.031 | 0.047 | 0.663 | Weak decoupling |
2007–2008 | 0.055 | 0.051 | 1.080 | Expansive coupling |
2008–2009 | −0.008 | 0.031 | −0.252 | Strong decoupling |
2009–2010 | 0.041 | 0.043 | 0.964 | Weak decoupling |
2010–2011 | 0.066 | 0.043 | 1.532 | Expansive coupling |
2011–2012 | 0.048 | 0.042 | 1.142 | Expansive coupling |
2012–2013 | −0.038 | 0.041 | −0.932 | Strong decoupling |
2013–2014 | 0.051 | 0.039 | 1.299 | Expansive coupling |
2014–2015 | 0.079 | 0.056 | 1.406 | Expansive coupling |
2015–2016 | −0.047 | 0.053 | −0.896 | Strong decoupling |
2016–2017 | 0.001 | 0.050 | 0.020 | Weak decoupling |
2017–2018 | 0.003 | 0.036 | 0.073 | Weak decoupling |
2018–2019 | 0.150 | 0.052 | 2.895 | Expansive coupling |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, Z.; Lv, D. Analysis of Agricultural CO2 Emissions in Henan Province, China, Based on EKC and Decoupling. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031931
Wang Z, Lv D. Analysis of Agricultural CO2 Emissions in Henan Province, China, Based on EKC and Decoupling. Sustainability. 2022; 14(3):1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031931
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Zhenjie, and Donghui Lv. 2022. "Analysis of Agricultural CO2 Emissions in Henan Province, China, Based on EKC and Decoupling" Sustainability 14, no. 3: 1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031931
APA StyleWang, Z., & Lv, D. (2022). Analysis of Agricultural CO2 Emissions in Henan Province, China, Based on EKC and Decoupling. Sustainability, 14(3), 1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031931