Evolution Game and Simulation Analysis of Disturbance Emergency Disposal of In-Flight Cabin: China Civil Aviation Security Strategy Study

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is an honor to review your article titled "Evolution Game and Simulation Analysis of Disturbance Emergency Disposal of In-Flight Cabin: China Civil Aviation Security Strategy Study." I have gone through it in detail and have identified a few areas that need attention for the next level of the manuscript:

1.    Please provide a separate section for the Literature Review (L.R) from the introduction section, and include more recent literature from the years 2022 and 2023.   

Please cite this article Tanveer, M., Khan, S.A.R., Umar, M. et al. Waste management and green technology: future trends in circular economy leading towards environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 80161–80178 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23238-8

2.    Please include a section for the Recommendations as well.

 3.    Review the reference section as it requires some attention. 

Thank you. 

To me, the English language in this manuscript is fine.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Strengths

The article presents a unique research topic and scope related to the research on the evolution game and simulation analysis of disturbance emergency disposal of in-flight cabins.

The manuscript fills the research gap of the described a very interesting problem of evolution game and simulation analysis of disturbance emergency disposal of in-flight cabins.

The solutions to the research problem contained in the text complement the scientific literature in the scope of the present issues.

The solutions presented by the authors are interesting and broaden the scope of research related to the evolution game and simulation analysis of disturbance emergency disposal of in-flight cabins.

The conclusions presented by the authors, based on the analysis of the literature are consistent with the evidence and arguments.

 

Weaknesses

There is no precisely defined purpose of the manuscript.

The significance of the research problem has not been presented in detail.

The research methodology has not been described in detail.

There are no references to the results of practical examples.

 

Authors should:

The purpose of the article should be specified.

Define the essence and importance of the described problem.

The methodology should be completed in detail with the conducted empirical research.

The article should contain practical examples of evolution games and simulation analysis of disturbance emergency disposal of in-flight cabins.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper constructed a cabin disturbance emergency management game model comprised of regulatory authority, airline security, airline security and disruptive passengers is then established. This model showed an excellent precision and Innovation. However, We need the author to revise the relevant content and answer some questions.

1: In Table 1, The content of Formula is not fully presented, which seriously affects readers' understanding of the content of the article.

2: In Lines 234, S₁ and P₁, P₂ did not provide specific instructions for them, and the same situation also occurs on lines 239 and 252.

3：Has this article compared the differences between the new model and the previous imperfect model to demonstrate the innovation of the new model? Simply stating that the newly created model lacks comparison and credibility.

4：In Table 1 , the relevant equations need to cite the following references(① https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.12.160 ②https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-023-10202-7 ③https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26279-9) to support their credibility.

5：The numerical difference between Figure 5a and Figure 5b needs to be explained.

Minor editing of English language required

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 4 Report

Please see the attached review report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

  The authors introduced additions and corrections to the text.

 

Reviewer 3 Report

This article has been extensively revised by the author and I believe it can be accepted and published in sustainability journals.