Correction: Hani et al. Sensitivity Analysis for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework for Site Selection of Aquifer Recharge with Reclaimed Water. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5399

The authors would like to make the following corrections to their published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:

In the Materials and Methods section, the MAR Data-Driven Selection Tool “Developer” is incorrectly referred to as the International Groundwater Resources Assessment Centre (IGRAC); the MAR Data-Driven Selection Tool is incorrectly referred to as the “IGRAC tool”; and the literature review undertaken using the database query tool is incorrectly stated to be conducted via IGRAC. Hence, the authors would like to make the following changes:

In the Materials and Methods section (Section 2.1; Paragraph 2), we replace the original version:

To determine the best type for the development of MAR projects in Delta, an assessment was conducted using a MAR data-driven selection tool developed by the International Groundwater Resources Assessment Centre (IGRAC) [30].

with

To determine the best type for the development of MAR projects in Delta, an assessment was conducted using a MAR data-driven selection tool developed by the Research Group INOWAS of the Department of Hydrosciences of the Faculty of Environmental Sciences at Technische Universität (TU) Dresden (INOWAS), Germany [30].

 

In the Materials and Methods section (Section 2.1; Paragraph 4), we replace the original version:

Based on the analyzed data for the selected case study using the IGRAC tool, the use of spreading methods or infiltration basins seems to result in low infrastructure demand and enables the infiltration and maintenance of large quantities of water at relatively low cost, which will result in a relatively simple anti-clogging procedure and will enable the removal of pollutants contained in the sources water by the soil.

with

Based on the data analyzed for the selected case study using the INOWAS tool [30], the use of spreading methods or infiltration basins seems to result in low infrastructure demand and enables the infiltration and maintenance of large quantities of water at relatively low cost, which will result in a relatively simple anti-clogging procedure and will enable the removal of pollutants contained in the source water by the soil.

 

In the Materials and Methods section (Section 2.3.1; Paragraph 1), we replace the original version:

The determination of influencing criteria for MAR suitability mapping for the West Delta site using reclaimed water and utilizing infiltration basins was determined based on an intensive literature review conducted by IGRAC [30] for about 66 scientific case studies from more than 18 countries.

with

The determination of influencing criteria for MAR suitability mapping for the West Delta site using reclaimed water and utilizing infiltration basins was determined based on an intensive literature review conducted by INOWAS [30] for about 66 scientific case studies from more than 18 countries.

 

The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.