Next Article in Journal
Numerical Simulation Study on the Evolution Law of Stress and Crack in Coal Seam Hydraulic Fracturing
Previous Article in Journal
Conditions for Multilevel Governance, Co-Management and Sustainability in Two Forest Communities in Central Mexico
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Exploratory Attitude and Belief Analysis of Ecotourists’ Destination Image Assessments and Behavioral Intentions

by
Rich Harrill
1,
Alexander Zuñiga-Collazos
2,
Marysol Castillo-Palacio
3 and
Lina Marcela Padilla-Delgado
4,*
1
School of Hospitality and Tourism Management, College of Hospitality, Retail and Sport Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
2
Departamento de Administración y Organizaciones, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760042, Colombia
3
Departamento de Gestión de Organizaciones, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali 760031, Colombia
4
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad de San Buenaventura, Cali 760031, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(14), 11349; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411349
Submission received: 14 June 2023 / Revised: 14 July 2023 / Accepted: 19 July 2023 / Published: 21 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Tourism, Culture, and Heritage)

Abstract

:
Colombia is noteworthy as a biodiversity hotspot, featuring an extraordinary number of endemic orchids, birds, and butterflies. This exploratory study examined how the perceptions of destination image, considering the cognitive and affective image, can be a predictor or positive influencer of behavioral intentions of ecotourists through symmetric data analysis. The success of a birdwatching destination can be attributed more to the development of a positive overall image, by having a direct and strong influence on behavioral intentions, indirect effects such as affective image can also be identified such as intention to visit and intention to recommend. Using partial least squares (PLS), the author(s) analyzed 64 survey responses collected of rural areas from an invitation made to associations of professional birdwatchers, including a new 15-statement scale specialized on birdwatching as a result of personal interviews with tourism management professionals and entrepreneurs who are experts in birdwatching. The findings supported the reliability of the model, and symmetric analysis presented the higher influence of emotions and affections in increasing intentions of recommendation, considering birdwatching as based on personal relationships. Additionally, the cognitive image for the birders despite representing destination attributes did not have the same impact on behavioral intentions. Therefore, managers should develop positioning strategies based on the generation of emotions.

1. Introduction

While COVID-19 and post-COVID restrictions continue to affect all forms of tourism, some forms of tourism, such as ecotourism, are poised to rebound due pent-up demand (especially domestic), as well as participation models falling within accepted pandemic norms such as social distancing. Demographically, birdwatchers reflect an economically resilient tourism segment with a high levels of education and high annual incomes, thus surviving the pandemic-induced economic downturn with ample discretionary income [1]. On the demand side, birdwatching features some economic inelasticity, as many birdwatchers consider the activity to be a lifestyle rather than a hobby with a high degree of knowledge and interest [2].
Although birdwatching can be a solitary pursuit, it does exhibit characteristics of being a tight-knit community, even referring to one another as “birders” rather than “birdwatchers” [3] and a high interest in social media with positive and negative effects on birdwatching behavior [4]. On the supply side, however, the social and economic impact of the pandemic placed millions of livelihoods at risk and threatens to roll back progress in advancing sustainable development goals [5]. Despite the near dependence of many communities around the world on birdwatching as the only ecotourism offering, the literature on birdwatching as a tourism activity remains scarce.
Colombia was one of the countries that, pre-pandemic, was poised to be a breakout destination for birdwatching, with over 1900 avian species and 79 endemic to the country. In general, however, Colombian tourism is still at a stage where ecotourism operations such as birdwatching are highly dependent on the local community for everything from guides to lodging, to transportation and food and beverage. Without the economic benefit of tourists such as birdwatchers, many of these communities unfortunately regress toward consumptive environmental practices, such as unsustainably harvesting and hunting local flora and fauna [5]. Thus, post-COVID-19, ecotourism activities such as birdwatching must be considered within the context of destination marketing and management.
As destination management strategy, the proper allocation of destination investments is difficult to estimate because of subjective nature of the destination image construct, including cognitive (beliefs) and affective (feelings) variables. The study here contributes an empirical analysis useful for assisting local businesses to identify the most important issues influencing tourists’ perception of the destination and its behavioral intentions. In addition to traditional measurement items for destination image, the study proposes 15 additional items that are specific to birdwatching as an ecotourism activity.
According to the idea of a dominant attraction, the greater the sense of obligation to visit, which means destination image should develop the attributes of the destinations, tourists’ perceptions of what the destination offers enhance the expectations of having their needs met and the probability of having a satisfying visit. Traditionally, destination image was mainly thought for marketing and branding. In this framework, tourists were considered as passive consumers who process some information; however, Web 2.0 revolutionized communication and information flows in many sectors, including tourism, and tourists became active consumers in physical and online platforms. Perceived destination image remains a critical factor in promoting the behavioral intention. Contemporary tourists seek different experiences during the trip, which means repetitive characteristics of a destination would be less valuable. This is even more relevant in post-COVID-19, as tourists might be too familiar with their nearby regions.
For a long time, there has been a great scientific interest in the study of the image of tourist destinations. However, there is very limited empirical evidence about the study of the image associated with specific types of tourism according to the vocations and/or levels of tourist development of the destinations. Currently, due to the pandemic caused by COVID-19, there is a need to provide a better understanding of the image of destinations but focused on different possibilities of economic reactivation in the sector. In this sense, this study stands out because: (1) it provides new empirical evidence on the topic of the study of the image of tourist destinations focused on specific types of tourism such as nature tourism in developing destinations, (2) it provides new measurement items for the multi-dimensional construct of the destination image, but specialized in nature tourism focused on a key tourism activity such as bird warning, and (3) it generates new alternatives to understand not only the image of the destination related to the intentions of returning to it but with the purpose of generating and identifying new possibilities and/or tourism marketing strategies that could be used to reactivate the sector in very rural areas affected by the pandemic caused by COVID-19.

2. Theoretical Background

According to Tan [6], destination image is, at the least, a “complex amalgam of products, services, and attributes, woven into a total impression. Image attributes are often classified cognitive and affective”. Based on this definition, destination image comprises a two-dimensional construct that is the sum of cognitive and affective opinions and impressions of an individual about a tourism destination. Current marketing research analyses the importance not only of the destination pre-evaluation or subjective ideas of the tourist but also the post-evaluation of the trip and destination. Other researchers considered destination image as the sum of beliefs, ideas, and impressions about the destination [7].
The cognitive image is related to beliefs and knowledge about the destination attributes, including natural attractions, environment, social atmosphere, and economic situation, and is based on an approach of destination factors [8]. These components may be embedded in destination attributes or sets of destination resources such as “the scenery, climatic, accommodation facilities, restaurants, historical and cultural attractions”, which may help form an internally accepted mental picture of a place [9].
The affective image is related to feelings and emotional responses to a travel destination, which has an important influence on the stage of destination selection. For the measurement of this construct, Stylidis, Shani, and Belhaussen [9] used semantic differential scales, including options like unpleasant–pleasant, sleepy–arousing, gloomy–exciting, and distressing–relaxing. Cognitive and affective images are related, and they present differences, although some authors argue that emotions are formed based on cognitions as a hierarchical process. The cognitive and affective evaluation represents the subjective associations of the destination.
In addition, Hernandez-Mogollon, Duarte, and Folgado-Fernandez [10] noted that “the interaction of both cognitive and affective aspects [of destination image] shapes a unique overall image through a comprehensive assessment of each destination, which includes ‘tourists’ over positive and negative evaluations of a place”. The authors argued that cognitive image generally refers to beliefs about a destination, while affective refers to the emotions toward a destination: the two-dimensional approach may represent the evaluation image. Whang, Yong, and Ko [11] defined this third component as “overall image as an attitude toward destination based on comprehensive evaluation of a particular [travel] phase”.
The attributes that influence perceived destination image are myriad—including natural resources, infrastructure, culture, political, economic, and social factors [12]. For example, according to Stylidis, Shani, and Behassen [9], the success of a destination may depend more on the global image than an image characteristic. The research provided evidence to support that cognitive and affective evaluations have direct impacts on the overall image, and the mediating role played by affective image between cognitive image and overall image of a travel destination. Specifically, for birdwatching, Kronenberg [13] identified that improving the tourist infrastructure and information on birdwatching opportunities emerge as a relevant component of destination, and environmental degradation is the most important threat.
Stylidis, Shani, and Belhassen [9] noted that both the cognitive and affective images influence tourists’ overall destination image, which, in turn, influences their behavioral intentions. In addition, the authors argued that very few studies analyzed the image based on perceptions of residents. For example, Kock, Josiassen, and Assaf [14] argued that “tourism studies are also not only interested in the overall evaluation of a destination (DI), but also frequently conceptualize the destination representation as a host of attributes that individuals mentally link with a destination” (p. 29). Akgun et al. [8] noted that some of the components of destination image are positively related to a tourist’s future behavioral intentions, especially the attractions, atmospheres, and value components of the cognitive image influence of tourists’ intention to recommend. This dimension also reveals the importance of cognitive images on tourists’ future behavioral intention in the nostalgic emotion context.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Case Background

Valle Del Cauca, a Department of Colombia, is an emerging birdwatching destination. This region of western Colombia is home to about 50% of the country’s species; as for municipalities according to SITUR (2018), Cali is the one with the greatest diversity recorded with 561 species, followed by Ibague (537), Medellin (445), Manizales (439), Popayan (338), Bogotá (269), and Pereira (203). Every year, thousands of tourists come, especially from the United States and Europe, to enjoy this immense natural wealth. To meet this demand, Valle del Cauca created a Bird Watching Tourism Club—an initiative for the conservation of these species, led by the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Tourism, through the Productive Transformation Program PTP, in partnership with the National Audubon Society, one of the most important ONGs in the world in the field of bird conservation.
Likewise, it represents a great opportunity for economic activity for tourism after a complex time with the global COVID-19 pandemic, representing an outlet for specialized segments, a tourist aware of the environment and the impact it generates, in addition to currently representing a profitable segment for participating companies in this sector.

3.2. Characteristics of the Sample

This study utilized both qualitative and quantitative methods. The first part presents an interview process with experts on the field and the second part presents a questionnaire for tourists. For the selection of the experts, the main representatives of tourism management in the region, who are focused on birdwatching, were contacted [15]; the experts had academic and professional experience on this tourist activity, face-to-face interviews were developed and whose objective was to develop a proposal for a measurement scale focused on this tourist activity. After the interviews, a categorization and coding process was carried out to identify what an important requirement for birdwatching destinations was. The answers were categorized into the different factors of cognitive image that were interpreted into natural characteristics, infrastructure, and social environment. After that, authors identified items that were not measured in the image evaluation scale and that are important for the development and evaluation of the birdwatching activity, which resulted in 15 additional (new) items for destination image scale measurement focused on birdwatchers (for the final scale, see Appendix A).
For the questionnaires, the main associations of birdwatchers were contacted, the project and its objectives were presented, and a formal invitation to participate was made. The associations distributed surveys in virtual and face-to-face format in sighting tourism areas for completion, considering the limitations of internet and connection in different rural areas, in addition to its difficult physical access. A pilot sample of 64 tourists were compiled in the study (see Table 1). Data analysis was made through partial least square with Smartpls software. PLS was used because the study represents the measurement of the construct of image based on a small segment of tourism as birders, allowing a reflective second order model. Incorporating cognitive image as a reflective second-order construct required special treatment [16]. We obtained indicators representing each dimension after running the PLS algorithm and estimating the latent variable values for each observation.
This study presents reflective constructs that are expected to contain a factor load equal to or >0.5 [16]. The evaluation of the reflective model was analyzed through (a) Cronbach’s alpha, (b) composite reliability index (CRI), and (c) the mean variance extracted (AVE). Nunnally and Bernstein [17] suggested a minimum value of 0.70 for Cronbach’s alpha. Fornell and Larcker [18] suggested values greater than 0.70 and 0.5 for CRI and AVE, respectively.

3.3. Scale Proposal [In-Depth Interviews Results]

This research made an important contribution of the questionnaire as a survey research tool for collecting information on the destination’s image focused on the tourist activity of birdwatching, from the perspective of tourists and visitors. For this study, a new scale of measurement was built for the specific activity of birdwatching and a pilot test was made. The process was developed using the in-depth interview as a qualitative tool. The selection of the interviewees was given through the level of experience of the expert. The following criteria were established: Expert bird watchers and experts in tourist development in birdwatching. The participation of the interviewees was given through their availability, and the purpose was to be able to develop specific items for this activity from experience in the field.
In-depth interviews were conducted with the main representatives of bird watching associations and groups in the southwestern part of the country, to identify the main aspects of bird watching activity that is related to the image of a destination from their experience. After the analysis of the interviews, three new items were determined for Factor 1 (natural/environmental characteristics) relating to the diversity of birds and contamination conditions of the territory. Nine new items for Factor 2 (tourist facilities/infrastructure) related, among other things, to specialized guidance, bilingualism (in this case, Spanish–English), and access to technology. Finally, three new items for Factor 5 (social environment/travel environment) related to access to clean water and the capacity to respond to emergencies. The following table (Table 2) presents the new items added to the scale development (for the final scale, see Appendix A):

4. Results of Pilot Testing

The research model was analyzed using partial least square (PLS) approach and SmartPLS software. PLS was used because the study represents the measurement of the construct of image based on a small segment of tourism as birders, allowing a reflective second order model. Incorporating cognitive image as a reflective second-order construct required special treatment [16,19]. In this analysis, cognitive image was presented as a ‘phantom’ variable. We obtained indicators representing each dimension after running the PLS algorithm and estimating the latent variable values for each observation.
The first step to validate the measurement model was to analyze the reliability for each of the factors. This study presents reflective constructs that were expected to contain a factor load equal to or >0.5 [16]. In the estimation of the initial model, the authors decided to eliminate the item IV4 (Cali could be my next place of vacation), the outer loading was inferior to 0.5. The evaluation of the reflective model was analyzed through (a) Cronbach’s alpha, (b) composite reliability index (CRI), and (c) the mean variance extracted (AVE). Nunnally and Bernstein [17] suggested a minimum value of 0.70 for Cronbach’s alpha. Fornell and Larcker [18] suggested values greater than 0.70 and 0.5 for CRI and AVE, respectively (see Table 3). The findings showed reliability of the scale.
Discriminant validity indicates that a given construct is significantly different from another construct. To assess this type of validity, the Fornell and Larcker [18] criteria and the HTMT matrix [20,21] were used. According to Fornell and Larcker [18], a construct has discriminant validity if its AVE is greater than the squared correlations between this construct and the others (see Table 4). Fornell and Larcker’s criteria confirmed discriminant validity.
Once the validity and reliability of the reflective model were demonstrated, the structural model was evaluated. For measuring relationships between variables, the beta coefficient (β) represents the strength. For the level of significance, the T-Student test was obtained from a bootstrapping process in the same statistical system. The following table (see Table 5 and Table 6) show the findings obtained for the structural model (direct and indirect effects).
Affective Image had a positive and direct effect in overall image and was verified in the study with a beta of 0.647 (high), with a significant T-value. Cognitive Image had a positive effect in overall image, and was also verified in the study, demonstrating a direct and positive relationship in the development of overall image with a beta of 0.316 (low–medium).
Overall Image had a positive effect to the intention to recommend the tourism destination, presented a strong influence with a beta of 0.811 (high) and a significant T-value, and a medium influence to revisit intention with a beta of 0.475 and a significant T-value; both were corroborated in this study. Likewise, it was identified that the Total Image was explained in 53.1% (R2: 0.531), the Intention to Recommend in 45.6% (R2: 0.456), and the Intention to Revisit the destination in 14% (R2: 0.140).
Additionally, the study identified that affective image was positively related to the intention to recommend and revisit the tourism destination with an indirect relationship; it was mediated through the Total Image of the destination, presenting an indirect beta of 0.525 (average–high) and 0.307 (medium–low), respectively, with a significant T-value. Also, an indirect effect of Cognitive Image over Intention to Recommend with a beta of 0.257 was found. Cognitive Image positively impacted the intention to visit not being validated in the present study, and the relationship was not statistically significant [19].
This study also considered, first, the conative image in the model, through the hypotheses. Cognitive image had a positive effect in overall image. Conative image related positively to the intention to recommend the tourism destination. Conative image related positively to the intention to revisit, according to the tri-partite definition of destination, proposed by authors such as Gartner [22], Chen, Ji, and Funk [23], Stylos, Vassiliadis, Bellou, and Andronikidis [24], Stylos, Bellou, Andronikidis, and Vassiliadis [25], Li et al. [26], but in this case, the present study did not support this paradigm.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

Managing the destination image for the promotion of certain types of tourists can generate positive effects for the region. In this case, Valle del Cauca is a department that has a high level of potential for the promotion and development of birdwatching tourism, attracting tourists who value the development of a natural environment that allows the maintenance of biodiversity, the visualization of different species, and the care of tourist spaces for the development of this activity. The study sought to contribute to measurement of the destination image, to understand the most relevant aspects for tourists, while, at the same time, being able to propose strategies that allow the development of tourist activity based on birdwatching in a sustainable way.
In this study, new empirical evidence was provided by proposing new items for a scale focused on the measurement of destination image, specifically for birdwatching. The findings allowed us to analyze the customer experience from the cognitive image. The model included two dimensions: the affective image associated with the emotions generated from the interaction with the destination through different channels and the cognitive image associated with the beliefs and knowledge of the same. In this case, the tourist managed to obtain a more holistic construction that included the total image of the destination, reaffirming a direct and positive effect on the behavioral intentions of the birdwatching tourist—specifically, the intention of visiting and recommending the destination.
For this study of birdwatching in Colombia, it should be noted that both cognitive and affective image resulted in a positive total image. However, it was identified that the greater weight within the formation of that total image can be attributed to the generation of emotions, because birdwatching tourists seek to have more emotional experiences when they practice this type of tourism activity. These findings support a cognitive experience that allows the accompaniment of services provided by local practitioners and operators, including combining knowledge and experience about Colombian flora and fauna—including microclimates and rare indigenous species—while providing a context for an emotional experience, which may include private tours or limited group tours among tourists that have the same emotional attachments in serene or obtrusive environments. In this way, participation might take place in the form of volunteerism in which the tourist makes a direct emotional investment in the experience.
While the success of a birdwatching destination can be attributed more to the development of a positive overall image, by having a direct and strong influence on behavioral intentions, indirect effects such as affective image can also be identified such as intention to visit and intention to recommend. These findings have implications, i.e., that the emotions and feelings that the destination generates is quite important for the birdwatching tourist. The level of emotional experience before, during, and after the trip can be promoted to indirectly influence tourist behavior, obtaining a favorable recommendation for the destination through a tourist’s social network and the intention to visit from potential tourists in this network.
The findings showed a greater interest of the respondents to recommend destinations with respect to their intention to revisit; therefore, future research may consider a detailed study on the main factors that influence the intention to revisit of tourists. From a practical perspective, this information is useful for a destination to create and sustain emotional bonds with tourists. In addition, the findings of this study provide an enhanced understanding of the relationship between the affective image and the intention to recommend and revisit the tourism destination in future research, where the cultural factors of the host community are also considered and their collective relationship with an affective image can also be studied.
The cognitive image as an indirect effect on the intention to recommend was also identified—the association of beliefs and positive knowledge about the destination’s attributes can influence the tourist’s intention to recommend as a destination for a potentially rewarding birdwatching experience. Likewise, this study identified that within the cognitive image, the factors with the greatest influence are the environment, accessibility to the destination, and destination infrastructure.

5.1. Implications for Practitioners

For practitioners in emerging or post-war destinations like Colombia that may otherwise provide excellent birdwatching locations, it is recommended that they focus on such factors as security, cleanliness, access to potable water, health services, and good value for the money. In addition, for these high-affective/high-cognition tourists in emerging or post-war destinations, it is important to have accessible infrastructure with comfortable and convenient transportation. Finally, the infrastructure highlights the importance of basic services, such as food and accommodations, ease to access birdwatching locations, support services, quality services, tourism information, tourist guides, and connectivity in remote locations, meaning electrical outlets for phone and phone-held photography and videography and Internet, as these images can be readily posted on social media and other media outlets.

5.2. Limitations and Future Research

However, this study presented limitations, including the number of tourists sampled. The research was undertaken during the pandemic and the level of visiting tourists was low. Future research could provide a larger tourist sample and make comparisons between the development of the image before and after the destination visit, especially a post hoc analysis of behavior once the destination has been visited. In addition, future research should address image formation during different stages as pre-travel, during the trip, and post-trip for significant changes in image formation based on trip stages. Finally, Colombia itself might be seen as somewhat as an outlier destination, given the strength of its biodiversity in a country emerging from decades of internal conflict.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, review, and editing, draft preparation: R.H.; supervision, methodology, validation, and scale development: A.Z.-C.; validation, supervision, and conceptualization: M.C.-P.; conceptualization, analysis, and field work L.M.P.-D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministerio de Ciencias, Tecnologia e Innovación—Colciencias, grant number N. 812, contract n. 19-02-0045.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the University’s ethics clearance, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of San Buenaventura University (CEI-USB-Cali, Approval Code: CieEco2-II-2022, Approval Date: 12 May 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

All participants of survey and in-depth interviews were fully informed of the anonymity, the objective of study, and the use for data with academic purposes.

Data Availability Statement

Data are unavailable due to privacy or ethical restrictions. If required, requests should be made to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Factors and Items Considered in the Measurement Instrument (survey).
Table A1. Factors and Items Considered in the Measurement Instrument (survey).
Cognitive Image
FactorItemAutores
FACTOR 1 (MED):The Region has beautiful natural landscapes[9]
Natural/environmental characteristicsThe Region’s weather is pleasant[9]
The destination has a variety of plans and animals[24]
The destination has a variety of bird speciesProject Result
The destination has uncontaminated natural environmentsProject Result
The destination has conditions for bird watchingProject Result
FACTOR 2 (INF) Tourist facilities/infrastructureThe destination has an attractive variety of restaurants[9]
Accommodation services are of high quality, modern, and adapted to current tourist needs[9]
Destination has a wide range of shopping facilities of easy access, modern, and adapted to current tourist needs[9]
The quality of service of the organizations that provide services to tourists is excellent.[9]
There is easy access and availability of tourist information[24]
The destination has expanded financial services (ATMs, banks and currency exchanges)Project Result
You have access to minimal shops for supplies (food and implements for sighting)Project Result
It is easily accessible to pharmacies (24 h)Project Result
The destination has bilingual guides on sighting trailsProject Result
The destination has tourist informantsProject Result
It is a destination with virtual connectivity (internet, operators and satellite telephony)Project Result
The destination has connectivity to energy sources to load implements (e.g., cell phones and cameras)Project Result
The destination has adequate logistics to access sighting points or tourist areas.Project Result
The destination has a natural food offerProject Result
FACTOR 3 (ATR):In the destination there is a great variety of tourist activities to carry out[9]
AttractionsThe destination has well-known tourist attractions[9]
The destination has an exciting and entertaining nightlife (e.g., good bars, restaurants, shows, casinos, etc.)[24]
The destination has good opportunities for cycling/landscaping/climbing/hiking[24]
The destination has interesting cultural attractions and important events[24]
The destination has a good reputation[24]
FACTOR 4 (ACC):Transportation in the city is comfortable and convenient[9]
Accessibility/SupportThe destination has developed infrastructure (roads, airport, public transport, health services, internet services)[9,27]
It is an easily accessible destination[9]
FACTOR 5 (ENT):It is a safe destination[9]
Social environment/travel environmentThe population of Cali is friendly[9]
It is a clean city (its streets are clean and the air quality is good)[9,27]
There is a good price-quality ratio of the services and products offered in the city[9,27]
The destination has accessibility to the provision of clean waterProject Result
The destination is prepared to attend the occurrence of natural eventsProject Result
It is a destination that has a proper attention to health issuesProject Result
Affective image
AF1. Valle del Cauca is a pleasant and nice place[27]
AF2. It is an entertaining, exciting and fun destination[27]
Total image
Overall Image of Valle del Cauca is:[9]
Intention to recommend the destination
You would recommend to your friends and/or family to visit the Valle del Cauca:[9]
Intention to revisit destination
IV1. I intend to travel to Valle del Cauca for the next two years.[24,25]
IV2. I want to visit the Valle del Cauca in over the next two years[24,25]
IV3. The possibility for me to travel to Valle del Cauca during the next two years is….[24,25]
IV4. Valle del Cauca could be my next vacation spot[24,25]
Bold titles represent the constructs of the study.

References

  1. Rutter, J.D.; Dayer, A.A.; Harshaw, H.W.; Cole, N.W.; Duberstein, J.N.; Fulton, D.C.; Raedeke, A.H.; Schuster, R.M. Racial, ethnic, and social patterns in the recreation specialization of birdwatchers: An analysis of United States eBird registrants. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 2021, 35, 100400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, S.; Scott, D.; Crompton, J.L. An Exploration of the Relationships Among Social Psychological Involvement, Behavioral Involvement, Commitment, and Future Intentions in the Context of Birdwatching. J. Leis. Res. 1997, 29, 320–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Scott, D.; Mcmahan, K.K. Hard-Core Leisure: A Conceptualization. Leis. Sci. 2017, 39, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ma, A.T.; Ng, S.L.; Cheung, L.T.; Lam, T.W. How do uses of and gratifications from social media platforms drive responsible birdwatching behavior? Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2021, 27, e01614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report; United Nations Statistics Division, Development Data and Outreach Branch: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tan, W.-K. Repeat visitation: A study from the perspective of leisure constraint, tourist experience, destination images, and experiential familiarity. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2017, 6, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, F.; Wen, J.; Ying, T. The influence of crisis on tourists’ perceived destination image and revisit intention: An exploratory study of Chinese tourists to North Korea. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2018, 9, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Akgün, A.E.; Senturk, H.A.; Keskin, H.; Onal, I. The relationships among nostalgic emotion, destination images and tourist behaviors: An empirical study of Istanbul. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2019, 16, 100355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stylidis, D.; Shani, A.; Belhassen, Y. Testing an integrated destination image model across residents and tourists. Tour. Manag. 2017, 58, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hernández-Mogollón, J.M.; Duarte, P.A.; Folgado-Fernández, J.A. The contribution of cultural events to the formation of the cognitive and affective images of a tourist destination. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2018, 8, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Whang, H.; Yong, S.; Ko, E. Pop culture, destination images, and visit intentions: Theory and research on travel motivations of Chinese and Russian tourists. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Beerli, A.; Martín, J.D. Factors influencing destination image. Ann. Tour. Res. 2004, 31, 657–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kronenberg, J. Birdwatchers’ wonderland? Prospects for the development of birdwatching tourism in Poland. J. Ecotour. 2016, 15, 78–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kock, F.; Josiassen, A.; Assaf, A.G. Advancing destination image: The destination content model. Ann. Tour. Res. 2016, 61, 28–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Empson, L. Elite interviewing in professional organizations. J. Prof. Organ. 2017, 5, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nunnally, J.; Bernstein, L. Psychometric Theory; McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fornell, C.; Lacker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Duarte, P.; Amaro, S. Methods for modeling reflective-formative second order constructs in PLS: An application to online travel shopping. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2018, 9, 295–313. [Google Scholar]
  20. Henseler, J.; Hubona, G.; Ray, P.A. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 2–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Gartner, W.C. Image formation process. In Communication and Channel Systems in Tourism Marketing; Uysal, M., Fesenmaier, D., Eds.; The Haworth Press: New York, NY, USA, 1993; pp. 191–215. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, N.; Ji, S.; Funk, D.C. An extended study on destination image decay of sport tourists over time. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2014, 2, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Stylos, N.; Vassiliadis, C.A.; Bellou, V.; Andronikidis, A. Destination images, holistic images and personal normative beliefs: Predictors of intention to revisit a destination. Tour. Manag. 2016, 53, 40–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Stylos, N.; Bellou, V.; Andronikidis, A.; Vassiliadis, C.A. Linking the dots among destination images, place attachment, and revisit intentions: A study among British and Russian tourists. Tour. Manag. 2017, 60, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Li, X.; Pan, B.; Zhang, L.; Smith, W.W. The effect of online information search on image development: Insights from a mixed-methods study. J. Travel Res. 2009, 48, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Martin-Santana, J.; Beerli-Palacio, A.; Nazzareno, P. Antecedents and consequences of destination image gap. Ann. Tour. Res. 2017, 62, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Respondents’ Characteristics.
Table 1. Respondents’ Characteristics.
GenderTotal%Birds Knowledge LevelTotal%
Woman2133%High1523%
Man4367%Medium3047%
Total 64100%Low1930%
AgeTotal%Total general64100%
18–24 69%Education LevelTotal%
25–34 1828%Postgraduate3859%
35–44 1727%Graduated2031%
45–54 1930%High School23%
55–64 23%Technician46%
65 or more23%Total64100%
Total64100%
Table 2. New items to be included in the image measurement scale for birders destinations in beliefs assessments.
Table 2. New items to be included in the image measurement scale for birders destinations in beliefs assessments.
Cognitive Image
FactorStatement for Being Included
Factor 1 (MED):
Natural/environmental characteristics
The destination has a variety of bird species
The destination has uncontaminated natural environments
The destination has conditions for bird watching
Factor 2 (INFR): Tourist facilities/InfrastructureThe destination has expanded financial services (ATMs, banks and currency exchanges)
You have access to minimal shops for supplies (food and implements for sighting)
It is easily accessible to pharmacies (24 h)
The destination has bilingual guides on sighting trails
The destination has tourist informants
It is a destination with virtual connectivity (Internet, operators, and satellite telephony)
The destination has connectivity to energy sources to load implements (e.g., cell phones and cameras)
The destination has adequate logistics to access sighting points or tourist areas.
The destination has a natural food offer
Factor 5 (ENT):
Social environment/travel environment
The destination has accessibility to the provision of clean water
The destination is prepared to attend the occurrence of natural events
It is a destination that has a proper attention to health issues
Table 3. Construct Reliability.
Table 3. Construct Reliability.
Construct Item Loadings Cronbach CRI AVE
Affective ImageAF10.9830.9650.9830.966
AF20.983
Cognitive imageMED0.5770.8300.8790.597
INFR0.813
ATR0.728
ACC0.843
ENT0.866
Intention to visitIV10.9480.9280.9540.874
IV20.947
IV30.910
Table 4. Fornell and Larcker’s Criteria.
Table 4. Fornell and Larcker’s Criteria.
Constructs Affective Image Cognitive Image Intention to Recommend Total Image Intention to Visit
Affective image0.983
Cognitive image0.0300.773
Intention to recommend0.2580.2911.000
Total image0.6560.3360.6391.000
Intention to visit0.0990.1580.6500.3370.935
Table 5. Structural Model (direct effects).
Table 5. Structural Model (direct effects).
Direct Effects Original Sample Mean (M) Standard Deviation (STDEV) T Statistics p Values 2.5% 97.5% Supported/Non Supported
Affective I → Total image0.6470.6490.0719.147 ***0.0000.5090.778S
Cognitive → Total image0.3160.3180.1062.989 **0.0030.1030.503S
Total image → Intention to visit0.4750.4760.1952.441 **0.0150.1020.873S
Total image → Intention to recommend0.8110.8030.1654.932 ***0.0000.4801.126S
R2 = (Overall image: 0.531 (adjusted 0.515); intention of recommend: 0.456 (adjusted 0.428); intention of revisit: 0.140 (adjusted: 0.097)) T-value > 1.96 * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.
Table 6. Structural Model (indirect effects).
Table 6. Structural Model (indirect effects).
Original Sample (O)Mean (M)Standard DeviationT Statisticsp Values2.5%97.5%S/NS
Affective → Total Image → Intention to visit0.3070.3140.1412.175 **0.0300.0570.597S
Cognitive → Total image → Intention to visit0.1500.1510.0861.757 **0.0790.0270.353NS
Affective →Total image → I. Recommend0.5250.5250.1393.770 ***0.0000.2760.801S
Cognitive → Total Image → I. recommend0.2570.2570.1082.369 **0.0180.0750.493S
T-value > 1.96 * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Harrill, R.; Zuñiga-Collazos, A.; Castillo-Palacio, M.; Padilla-Delgado, L.M. An Exploratory Attitude and Belief Analysis of Ecotourists’ Destination Image Assessments and Behavioral Intentions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411349

AMA Style

Harrill R, Zuñiga-Collazos A, Castillo-Palacio M, Padilla-Delgado LM. An Exploratory Attitude and Belief Analysis of Ecotourists’ Destination Image Assessments and Behavioral Intentions. Sustainability. 2023; 15(14):11349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Harrill, Rich, Alexander Zuñiga-Collazos, Marysol Castillo-Palacio, and Lina Marcela Padilla-Delgado. 2023. "An Exploratory Attitude and Belief Analysis of Ecotourists’ Destination Image Assessments and Behavioral Intentions" Sustainability 15, no. 14: 11349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop