Enhancing Data Management Strategies with a Hybrid Layering Framework in Assessing Data Validation and High Availability Sustainability

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

"Enhancing Data Management Strategies with Hybrid Layering Framework: Assessing Data Validation and High Availability Sustainability"

 

Decision: Accept with Minor Corrections

 

The title, "Enhancing Data Management Strategies with Hybrid Layering Framework: Assessing Data Validation and High Availability Sustainability," effectively conveys the scope of the proposed research. It is clear and concise, which is essential for attracting the interest of potential readers and researchers in the field.

 

However, there are some minor corrections that can enhance the work clarity and readability:

 

General comments:

* The manuscript necessitates thorough language refinement.

* It is imperative to update all references, ensuring that none predate 2018.

* Consider providing a clearer explanation of the research gap in the introduction.

* Main Contribution of Research:

 

1- the background section in the abstract is relatively long, please intrdouce the topic iin only 2-3 lines, move direlcty to the maon objective. 

Abstract:

2- The abstract should be a concise summary of the research paper, highlighting the key objectives, methodology, and findings. Currently, it lacks brevity and clarity. It should be revised to provide a clearer and more concise overview of the research.

3-Introduction:

The introduction should establish the context and purpose of the study. It would be helpful to provide a brief explanation of the;

Data Management Strategies

 Hybrid Layering

then link them together with the most recent studies, 

make sure to ptovide the research hypothesis (if any) since you are developing a model. 

no litrature review section? 

how are you going to construct your discussion without litratuire reivew? 

 

Author Response

Enhancing Data Management Strategies with Hybrid Layering Framework in Assessing data validation and high availability sustainability

Reviewer No. (1)

We greatly appreciate all the enhancements you made to the manuscript. We sincerely appreciate all of the suggestions.

Comment no.	Comments	Explanation, page & paragraph  no. of revised version.
1st comment of the reviewer 1	We have improved the manuscript for consistency, grammar and spelling.	The entire manuscript was verified and double-checked for proper English usage.
2nd comment of the reviewer 1	We have updated all references with no longer than 2018.	All references have been revised and reorganized.
3rd comment of the reviewer 1	We have rewrote the research gap in introduction section.	The introduction was rewritten and revised based on the suggestions of the reviewers.
4th comment of the reviewer 1	We have rewrote the abstract based on the reviwer’s suggestion.	The abstract was rewritten and revised based on the suggestions of the reviewers.
5th comment of the reviewer 1	The introduction should establish the context and purpose of the study. It would be helpful to provide a brief explanation of the Data Management Strategies  Hybrid Layering then link them together with the most recent studies, make sure to ptovide the research hypothesis (if any) since you are developing a model.	The introduction was rewritten and revised based on the suggestions of the reviewers
6th comment of the reviewer 1	No litrature review section? How are you going to construct your discussion without literature review?	Section 2: Theoretical Background was added. The discussion was compared with prior relevant studies and their results.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this manuscript, the authors have proposed a robust hybrid-layering framework, combining trickle and zero-down time techniques, meticulously designed to streamline data migration. However, I have reservations about whether the contribution of this work meets the standard of this journal. Therefore, I recommend that the authors consider submitting this manuscript to other journals where it can undergo further peer review and receive additional feedback. Below, I have provided detailed comments that influenced my decision:

 

1.The abstract provides a good overview of the paper's objectives and contributions. However, it could benefit from a clearer structure, with distinct sections for problem statement, methodology, results, and conclusion.

2. It would be helpful to provide a more detailed introduction that clearly defines the problem you are addressing in the context of data management. Explain why this problem is important and what the current challenges are.

3. The abstract mentions a "robust hybrid-layering framework" but does not provide any details about this framework. Consider briefly explaining the key components or methods used in the framework.

4. Expand on the practical applications of your research. How can organizations implement your hybrid-layering framework? Are there any real-world examples or case studies that demonstrate its effectiveness?

 

5.Consider adding a table of symbols used in the paper to enhance readability and make it easier for readers to understand the notation.

Author Response

Enhancing Data Management Strategies with Hybrid Layering Framework in Assessing data validation and high availability sustainability

Reviewer No. (2)

We greatly appreciate all the enhancements you made to the manuscript. We sincerely appreciate all of the suggestions.

Comment no.	Comments	Explanation, page & paragraph  no. of revised version
1st comment of the reviewer 2	The abstract provides a good overview of the paper's objectives and contributions. However, it could benefit from a clearer structure, with distinct sections for problem statement, methodology, results, and conclusion.	The abstract was rewritten and revised based on the suggestions of the reviewers.
2nd comment of the reviewer 2	We have rewrote the introduction ...... It would be helpful to provide a more detailed introduction that clearly defines the problem you are addressing in the context of data management. Explain why this problem is important and what the current challenges are.	The introduction was rewritten and revised based on the suggestions of the reviewers.
3rd comment of the reviewer 2	We have added more information of a robust hybrid-layering framework. The abstract mentions a "robust hybrid-layering framework" but does not provide any details about this framework. Consider briefly explaining the key components or methods used in the framework.	Section 3 Research Model and Methodology was presented after reorganizing the manuscript. All essential components and the operational framework were described.
4th comment of the reviewer 2	We have provided the real-world case study ..... Expand on the practical applications of your research. How can organizations implement your hybrid-layering framework? Are there any real-world examples or case studies that demonstrate its effectiveness?	After reorganizing the manuscript, sections 3.3 and 3.4 presented a real-world case study to evaluate the hybrid-layering framework. Sections 3.5 Data Collection and 3.6 Results were separated to facilitate implementation in the real world.
5th comment of the reviewer 2	Consider adding a table of symbols used in the paper to enhance readability and make it easier for readers to understand the notation.	All tables were rearranged on a single page, and descriptions were rewritten to make them more comprehensible.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

 

This paper is well organized and written. With a few modifications, the quality of this paper can be better improved:

1.        The contributions of this paper can be summarized point by point.

2.        In section 3, the evaluation results can be improved by comparing the proposed work with some existing studies reviewed in Section 2.

3.        Some references in the second section are relatively out of date. The authors are suggested to add five more recent literature in the past three years.

4.        The English editing should be improved.

 

Extensive editing of English language required.

Author Response

Enhancing Data Management Strategies with Hybrid Layering Framework in Assessing data validation and high availability sustainability

Reviewer No. (3)

We greatly appreciate all the enhancements you made to the manuscript. We sincerely appreciate all of the suggestions.

Comment no.	Comments	Explanation, page & paragraph  no. of revised version.
1st comment of the reviewer 3	The contributions of this paper can be summarized point by point.	The introduction was rewritten and revised based on the suggestions of the reviewers.
2nd comment of the reviewer 3	In section 3, the evaluation results can be improved by comparing the proposed work with some existing studies reviewed in Section 2.	After reorganizing the manuscript, sections 3.3 and 3.4 presented a real-world case study to evaluate the hybrid-layering framework. Sections 3.5 Data Collection and 3.6 Results were separated to facilitate implementation in the real world.
3rd comment of the reviewer 3	Some references in the second section are relatively out of date. The authors are suggested to add five more recent literature in the past three years.	All references have been revised and reorganized.
4th comment of the reviewer 3	The English editing should be improved.	The entire manuscript was verified and double-checked for proper English usage.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

Please simplify the script further, because the number of pages is too many! There are many figures and tables that do not fit on one page, please compress them and move them to the appendix! Describe it according to the context of your research, don't look too far away!

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Please simplify the script further, because the number of pages is too many! There are many figures and tables that do not fit on one page, please compress them and move them to the appendix! Describe it according to the context of your research, don't look too far away!

Author Response

Enhancing Data Management Strategies with Hybrid Layering Framework in Assessing data validation and high availability sustainability

Reviewer No. (4)

We greatly appreciate all the enhancements you made to the manuscript. We sincerely appreciate all of the suggestions.

Comment no.	Comments	Explanation, page & paragraph  no. of revised version.
1st comment of the reviewer 4	We have revised the title without a subtitle.	The title has been revised and modified.
2nd comment of the reviewer 4	We have rewrote the abstract based on reviwer’s suggestion	The abstract was rewritten and revised based on the suggestions of the reviewers.
3rd comment of the reviewer 4	We have rewritten the five keywords in alphabetical order	The keywords were revised based on the suggestions of the reviewers.
4th comment of the reviewer 4	We have rewrote the introduction ......	The introduction was rewritten and revised based on the suggestions of the reviewers.
5th comment of the reviewer 4		Section 2: Theoretical Background was added. The discussion was compared with prior relevant studies and their results. After reorganizing the manuscript, sections 3.3 and 3.4 presented a real-world case study to evaluate the hybrid-layering framework. Sections 3.5 Data Collection and 3.6 Results were separated to facilitate implementation in the real world.
6th comment of the reviewer 4		The figures were reorganized based on the suggestions of the reviewers
		All tables were rearranged on a single page, and descriptions were rewritten to make them more comprehensible.
7th comment of the reviewer 4		All tables were rearranged on a single page, and descriptions were rewritten to make them more comprehensible.
8th comment of the reviewer 4		All tables were rearranged on a single page, and descriptions were rewritten to make them more comprehensible.
9th comment of the reviewer 4	Table 2, 3 , 4, 5, 7	All tables were rearranged on a single page, and descriptions were rewritten to make them more comprehensible.
10th comment of the reviewer 4	Figure 2 and 3	All tables were rearranged on a single page, and descriptions were rewritten to make them more comprehensible.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have revised the paper to fix most of the concerns.