Social Issues and Challenges among Oil Palm Smallholder Farmers in Malaysia: Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Review Protocol
2.2. Formulation of Research Questions
2.3. Systematic Search Strategy
2.3.1. Identification
2.3.2. Screening
2.3.3. Eligibility
2.3.4. Quality Appraisal
2.3.5. Data Abstraction and Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Background of the Selected Studies
3.2. Theme Formation—Attitude, Education, and Welfare
3.2.1. OPSF Attitudes toward Technology Adoption, Cooperative Involvement, and Farm Productivity
3.2.2. OPSF Education towards Adaptation of Related Extension Programs
3.2.3. OPSF Welfare
4. Discussions
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- MPIC. Kementerian Perusahaan Perladangan dan Komoditi (Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities). 2021. Available online: http://mpic.gov.my (accessed on 25 May 2022).
- MPIC. Kementerian Perusahaan Perladangan dan Komoditi (Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities). 2022. Available online: http://mpic.gov.my/mpi/sidebar-prestasi-kdnk (accessed on 26 July 2022).
- MPOB. Malaysian Palm Oil Board—Overview of the Malaysian Oil Palm Industry. 2021. Available online: https://mpob.gov.my (accessed on 26 July 2022).
- RSPO. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. 2022. Available online: https://www.rspo.org (accessed on 26 July 2022).
- Claudine, N.; Reza, A. A Review of Smallholder Oil Palm Production: Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing Sustainability—A Malaysian Perspective. J. Oil Palm Environ. 2012, 3, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MPOB. Malaysian Palm Oil Board. 2022. Available online: https://mspo.mpob.gov.my (accessed on 26 July 2022).
- Basaruddin, N.H.; Kannan, P.; Hashim, K.; Johari, M.A.; Dahari, N.; Isnin, M.K.A. Acceptance Level of Independent Oil Palm Smallholders in Malaysia Towards Extension Services. Int. J. Mod. Trends Soc. Sci. 2021, 4, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Begum, H.; Choy, E.A.; Alam, A.S.A.F.; Siwar, C.; Ishak, S. Sustainability practices framework of the palm oil milling sub-sector: A literature survey. Int. J. Environ. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 2019, 387–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, K.H.D.; Al Qahtani, H.M.S. Sustainability of oil palm plantations in Malaysia. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2020, 22, 4999–5023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berita Harian. Pensijilan MSPO 2022 ganti MSPO 2013. 2022. Available online: www.bharian.com.my (accessed on 27 August 2022).
- Begum, H.; Alam, A.S.A.F.; Choy, E.A. Social sustainability of oil palm settlers. In Proceedings of the National Research & Innovation Conference for Graduate Students in Social Sciences, Corus Paradise Resort Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia, 5–7 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Begum, H.; Siwar, C.; Alam, A.S.A.F.; Choy, E.A.; Ishak, S.; Alam, L. Enhancing sustainability amongst oil palm smallholders in Malaysia. Int. J. Agric. Resour. Gov. Ecol. 2018, 14, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noordeyana, T.; Choy, E.A.; Yusoff, N.H.; Abas, A.; Halim, U.L. Well-Being Challenges of Palm Oil Smallholders Community. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2021, 18, 262–278. [Google Scholar]
- Ngan, S.L.; Er, A.C.; Yatim, P.; How, B.S.; Lim, C.H.; Ng, W.P.Q.; Chan, Y.H.; Lam, H.L. Social Sustainability of Palm Oil Industry: A Review. Front. Sustain. 2022, 3, 855551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaifalaila, Z.; Abdul, R.A.R.; Zaki, A. The Future of Oil Palm Smallholders Toward Greater Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 2022, 30, 283–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdul Majid, N.; Ramli, Z.; Md Sum, S.; Awang, A.H. Sustainable Palm Oil Certification Scheme Frameworks and Impacts: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aziz, N.F.; Chamhuri, N.; Batt, P.J. Barriers and Benefits Arising from the Adoption of Sustainable Certification for Smallholder Oil Palm Producers in Malaysia: A Systematic Review of Literature. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parthiban, K.; Nur Hanani, M.; Nazira, K.R.; Tan, S.P.; Siti, M.M. A Review on the Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil Certification Process Among Independent Oil Palm Smallholders. J. Oil Palm Res. 2021, 33, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nur Hafizah, Y.; Er, A.C.; Noordeyana, T.; Azlan, A. A Scoping Review of Wellbeing And Quality Of Life Among Oil Palm Smallholders. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2021, 18, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Haddaway, N.R.; Macura, B.; Whaley, P.; Pullin, A.S. ROSES Reporting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: Pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environ. Evid. 2018, 7, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaffril, H.A.M.; Ahmad, N.; Samsuddin, S.F.; Samah, A.A.; Hamdan, M.E. Systematic literature review on adaptation towards climate change impacts among indigenous people in the Asia Pacific regions. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaffril, H.A.M.; Samah, A.A.; Samsuddin, S.F.; Ali, Z. Mirror-mirror on the wall, what climate change adaptation strategies are practiced by the Asian’s fishermen of all? J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 232, 104e117. [Google Scholar]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int. J. Surg. 2021, 88, 105906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, N.; Kamaruddin, M.A.; Sheikh, U.U.; Yusup, Y.; Bakht, M.P. Oil Palm and Machine Learning: Reviewing One Decade of Ideas, Innovations, Applications, and Gaps. Agriculture 2021, 11, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papilo, P.; Marimin, M.; Hambali, E.; Machfud, M.; Yani, M.; Asrol, M.; Evanila, E.; Prasetya, H.; Mahmud, J. Palm oil-based bioenergy sustainability and policy in Indonesia and Malaysia: A systematic review and future agendas. Heliyon 2022, 8, e10919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Axelsson, R.; Angelstam, P.; Degerman, E.; Teitelbaum, S.; Andersson, K.; Elbakidze, M.; Drotz, M.K. Social and cultural sustainability: Criteria, indicators, verifier variables for measurement and maps for visualisation to support planning. Ambio 2013, 42, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaffril, H.A.M.; Krauss, S.E.; Samsuddin, S.F. A systematic review on Asian’s farmers’ adaptation practices towards climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 644, 683–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haddaway, N.R.; Collins, A.M.; Coughlin, D.; Kirk, S. The role of Google scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PloS ONE 2015, 10, e0138237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kraus, S.; Breier, M.; Dasí-Rodríguez, S. The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2020, 16, 1023–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Q.N.; Fàbregues, S.; Bartlett, G.; Boardman, F.; Cargo, M.; Dagenais, P.; Gagnon, M.P.; Griffiths, F.; Nicolau, B.; O’Cathain, A.; et al. The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ. Inf. 2018, 34, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shaffril, H.A.M.; Samah, A.A.; Kamarudin, S. Speaking of the devil: A systematic literature review on community preparedness for earthquakes. Nat. Hazards 2021, 108, 2393–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isah, S.N.; Norsida, M.; Nitty, H.K.; Zulkefly, S. Smallholder oil palm farmers’ pro-adaptation behaviour under climate impact scenario: Application of protection Motivation Theory. Clim. Dev. 2020, 13, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azima, A.M.; Er, A.C. The issue of land ownership and its implications for the productivity of smallholders: A case study of smallholders in Lahad Datu, Sabah. Malays. J. Soc. Space 2015, 11, 112–124. [Google Scholar]
- Azima, A.M.; Er, A.C.; Novel, L.; Vivien, W.C.Y. Mendepani kekangan inovasi dan teknologi dalam kalangan pekebun kecil sawit di Sabah. Malays. J. Soc. Space 2018, 14, 56–67. [Google Scholar]
- Yew, V.W.C.; Saiful, F.M.R.; Lyndon, N.; Junaidi, A.B.; Suhana, S.; Awang, A.H.; Sivapalan, S.; Wei, L.J. Sustainable Farming of Indigenous Oil Palm Smallholders in Peninsular Malaysia. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2020, 17, 80–92. [Google Scholar]
- Sarmila, M.S.; Zaimah, R.; Rusyda, R.; Novel, L.; Rosniza, A.C.R.; Nur, H.M.; Zaki, A.; Nazirah, J.; Khairul, A.I. The contribution of cooperatives to the social development of the smallholder oil palm community. Malays. J. Soc. Space 2017, 13, 19–28. [Google Scholar]
- Tenge, F.; Zurinah, T.; Arvin, R. Perceptions of the Use of Modern Technology in Oil Palm Planting. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2021, 18, 176–194. [Google Scholar]
- Ab Rahman, A.H.; Abdullah, A.; Selvadurai, S.; Zakaria, S.Z.S.; Lyndon, N.; Abidin, K. Social Media Literacy among Oil Palm Smallholders in East Malaysia and Association with Oil Palm Integration Practices. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, I.; Awang, A.H.; Hashim, K.; Ramli, Z.; Lyndon, N.; Azian, F.U.M.; Johari, M.A.; Peng, T.S.; Basaruddin, N.H.; Hamid, M.H.A.; et al. Independent Oil Palm Smallholder Participation and Technology Transfer; Abdul Wahab, M., Ahmad Zakaria, R., Ramli, Z., Eds.; Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adnan, S.S.; Zaman, N.B.K.; Othman, N.M. Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) among Oil Palm Settlers in Felda Alor Setar Region, Kedah: A Survey. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1059, 012012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahidan, A.S.; Aman, Z.; Rahim, A.R.A.; Che Jaafar, N.; Mat Taib, H.; Rasuddin, R.; Arifin, A.; Sohimi, M.R. Factors Influencing The Performance of Sustainable Oil Palm Growers Cooperative In Sabah. Int. J. Mod. Trends Soc. Sci. 2021, 4, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaimah, R.; Novel, L.; Sarmila, M.S.; Mohd, Y.H. The level of satisfaction of small oil palm smallholders with the practice of oil palm integration. Malays. J. Soc. Space 2018, 14, 97–107. [Google Scholar]
- Abazue, C.M.; Er, A.C.; Ferdous Alam, A.S.A. Oil palm smallholders and its sustainability practices in Malaysia. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 2015, 6, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MPOC. Malaysian Palm Oil Council. 2023. Available online: https://mpoc.org.my/about-palm-oil/ (accessed on 30 January 2023).
- Khayriyyah, M.H.; Aini, H.A.M.; Priscillia, M.; Goh, C.S.; Shahrul, A.M.S.; Nadine, R. Impact of Malaysian palm oil on sustainable development goals: Co-benefits and trade-offs across mitigation strategies. Sustain. Sci. 2022, 17, 1639–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parthiban, K.; Tan, S.P.; Siti, M.A.; Idris, A.S.; Ayatollah, K.; Khairuman, H.; Hamdan, A.B.; Wahid, O. Knowledge assessment of basal stem rot disease of oil palm and its control practices among recipients of replanting assistance scheme in Malaysia. Int. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 12, 73–81. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammad, F.S.; Abdul Rahman, A.A.; Azan Dzuhri, M.; Mohd Hasdi, M.; Er, A.C. The Environmental and Economic Sustainability among Oil Palm Smallholders in Carey Island, Selangor. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2021, 18, 49–63. [Google Scholar]
- Cramb, R.A. Problems of State-Sponsored Land Schemes for Small Farmers: The Case of Sarawak, Malaysia. Pac. Viewp. 1992, 33, 58–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MPOCC. Malaysia Palm Oil Certification Council. 2022. Available online: https://www.mpocc.org.my/faqs (accessed on 27 June 2022).
- Muhammad, K.I.; Sharaai, A.H.; Ismail, M.M.; Harun, R.; Yien, W.S. Social implications of palm oil production through social life cycle perspectives in Johor, Malaysia. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 24, 935–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manik, Y.; Leahy, J.; Halog, A. Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: A case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 2013, 18, 1386–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MPOCC. Malaysia Palm Oil Certification Council—SIA Guidelines and Approach (Draft 2 30 October 2021). 2021. Available online: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/604db3a6dad32a12b2415387/t/618aa1acdba1de65cf5d1930/1636475315659/SIA+Guidelines_Draft2_29102021.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2022).
- UNEP. Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products; United Nations Environment Program/SETAC: Rue de Milan, France, 2009. [Google Scholar]
Database | Search String |
---|---|
WoS | TS ((“isu” OR “cabaran” OR “impak” OR “kesan” OR “krisis” OR “issue*” OR “challenge*” OR “impacts*” OR “effect*” OR “crisis”) AND (“sosial” OR “komuniti” OR “kebajikan” OR “tempat tinggal” OR “kesihatan” OR “pendidikan” OR “hak kesamaan” OR “hak asasi” OR “peluang pekerjaan” OR “penilaian impak sosial” OR “penilaian kitar hayat sosial” OR “social” OR “society*” OR “societal” OR “community*” OR “welfare*” OR “health” OR “equality*” OR “education*” OR “human right*” OR “social impact assessment*” OR “social life cycle assessment*”) AND (“pekebun kecil sawit” OR “pekebun kecil” OR “smallholder oil palm farmer*” OR “smallholder farmer*”) AND (“oil palm*” OR “palm oil” OR “minyak sawit” OR “kelapa sawit” OR “sawit”)) |
Scopus | TITLE-ABS-KEY ((“isu” OR “cabaran” OR “impak” OR “kesan” OR “krisis” OR “issue*” OR “challenge*” OR “impacts*” OR “effect*” OR “crisis”) AND (“sosial” OR “komuniti” OR “kebajikan” OR “tempat tinggal” OR “kesihatan” OR “pendidikan” OR “hak kesamaan” OR “hak asasi” OR “peluang pekerjaan” OR “penilaian impak sosial” OR “penilaian kitar hayat sosial” OR “social” OR “society*” OR “societal” OR “community*” OR “welfare*” OR “health” OR “equality*” OR “education*” OR “human right*” OR “social impact assessment*” OR “social life cycle assessment*”) AND (“pekebun kecil sawit” OR “pekebun kecil” OR “smallholder oil palm farmer*” OR “smallholder farmer*”) AND (“oil palm*” OR “palm oil” OR “minyak sawit” OR “kelapa sawit” OR “sawit”)) |
Google Scholar | social OR sosial AND pekebun kecil sawit OR smallholder oil palm farmers AND Malaysia |
Screening Criterion | Details |
---|---|
Publication type | Articles (review articles were not selected) |
Language type | English and Malay |
Timeframe | Ten years |
Type of findings | Empirical data |
Focus findings | Data related to the social challenges faced by oil palm smallholder farmers in Malaysia |
Study Form | Evaluation Criteria |
---|---|
Qualitative | QA1—Does the qualitative approach answer the research question? |
QA2—Is the qualitative data collection method sufficient to answer the research question? | |
QA3—Are the study data sufficient for the study results? | |
QA4—Is the interpretation of the study results sufficient with the data obtained? | |
QA5—Is there coherence (relationship) between sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data? | |
Quantitative (descriptive) | QA1—Is the sampling strategy relevant to answering the research question? |
QA2—Are the respondents representative of the target population? | |
QA3—Are measurements sufficient? | |
QA4—Is there a low probability of non-response bias? | |
QA5—Do the results of the statistical analysis adequately address the research question? | |
Quantitative (non-random) | QA1—Are the respondents representative of the intended population? |
QA2—Are measurements adequate for both the result and the exposure (or intervention)? | |
QA3—Do complete outcome data exist? | |
QA4—Are confounders taken into account in the design and analysis? | |
QA5—Is the intervention (or exposure) delivered as intended during the research period? | |
Mixed mode | QA1—Is it sufficient and rational to use mixed modes to answer research questions? |
QA2—Does the difference in the components of this study lead to an answer to the research question? | |
QA3—Are the results of integrating qualitative and quantitative components properly interpreted? | |
QA4—Is it properly addressed when there are discrepancies and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results? | |
QA5—Do the various components of the study meet the quality requirements of each method’s tradition? |
Research | Type of Study | QA1 | QA2 | QA3 | QA4 | QA5 | Number of Criteria Met | Accepted for Review |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basaruddin et al. [7] | QN(D) | / | / | / | / | / | 5/5 | Yes |
Isah et al. [32] | QN (D) | / | / | / | / | / | 5/5 | Yes |
Azima et al. [33] | QL | / | / | / | / | / | 5/5 | Yes |
Azima et al. [34] | QN (D) | / | / | / | / | / | 5/5 | Yes |
Yew et al. [35] | QL | / | / | / | / | / | 5/5 | Yes |
Sarmila et al. [36] | QN(D) | / | / | / | / | / | 5/5 | Yes |
Tenge et al. [37] | QN(D) | / | / | / | / | X | 4/5 | Yes |
Ab Rahman et al. [38] | QN(D) | / | / | / | / | / | 5/5 | Yes |
Ibrahim et al. [39] | QN(D) | / | / | / | / | / | 5/5 | Yes |
Adnan et al. [40] | QN(D) | / | / | / | / | / | 5/5 | Yes |
Sahidan et al. [41] | QN(D) | / | / | / | / | / | 5/5 | Yes |
Zaimah et al. [42] | QN (D) | / | / | / | / | / | 5/5 | Yes |
Research | Study Area | Methods | Year of Publication |
---|---|---|---|
Basaruddin et al. [7] | Random | Quantitative (in-depth statistical analysis) | 2021 |
Isah et al. [32] | Random | Quantitative (in-depth statistical analysis) | 2020 |
Azima et al. [33] | Sabah | Qualitative (in-depth interview) | 2015 |
Azima et al. [34] | Sabah | Quantitative (descriptive analysis) | 2018 |
Yew et al. [35] | Pahang | Qualitative (in-depth interview) | 2020 |
Sarmila et al. [36] | Sarawak | Quantitative (descriptive analysis) | 2017 |
Tenge et al. [37] | Selangor | Quantitative (descriptive analysis) | 2021 |
Ab Rahman et al. [38] | Sarawak | Quantitative (in-depth statistical analysis) | 2021 |
Ibrahim et al. [39] | Perak and Sarawak | Quantitative (descriptive analysis) | 2021 |
Adnan et al. [40] | Kedah | Quantitative (in-depth statistical analysis) | 2022 |
Sahidan et al. [41] | Sabah | Quantitative (in-depth statistical analysis) | 2021 |
Zaimah et al. [42] | Johor | Quantitative (in-depth statistical analysis) | 2017 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Siti-Dina, R.P.; Er, A.C.; Cheah, W.Y. Social Issues and Challenges among Oil Palm Smallholder Farmers in Malaysia: Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043123
Siti-Dina RP, Er AC, Cheah WY. Social Issues and Challenges among Oil Palm Smallholder Farmers in Malaysia: Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. 2023; 15(4):3123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043123
Chicago/Turabian StyleSiti-Dina, Razman Pahri, Ah Choy Er, and Wai Yan Cheah. 2023. "Social Issues and Challenges among Oil Palm Smallholder Farmers in Malaysia: Systematic Literature Review" Sustainability 15, no. 4: 3123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043123