Next Article in Journal
Analysis and Prediction of Risky Driving Behaviors Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Machine Learning Techniques
Next Article in Special Issue
Pollution Source and Soil Quality Assessments of Heavily Contaminated Soils by Selected Potentially Toxic Elements in a Human-Degraded Wetland Area
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Economy Development, Rural Land Certification, and Rural Industrial Integration
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Relation between Atmospheric Aerosol Concentration and SARS-CoV-2 Variants’ Infection and Mortality Rates in the United States: A Remote-Sensing Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anthropression as a Factor Affecting the Content of Heavy Metals in the Flowers of Sambucus nigra L.—A Medicinal Plant Affecting Human Health

by
Anna Figas
1,*,
Mirosław Kobierski
2,
Anetta Siwik-Ziomek
2,
Magdalena Tomaszewska-Sowa
1 and
Zofia Gruszka
1
1
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Bernardyńska 6, 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland
2
Department of Biogeochemistry and Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Bernardyńska 6, 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(11), 4641; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114641
Submission received: 15 April 2024 / Revised: 21 May 2024 / Accepted: 24 May 2024 / Published: 30 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Pollution and Impacts on Human Health)

Abstract

:
The harvesting of herbs from urban and peri-urban areas requires systematic monitoring of soils and plants, especially of trace element concentrations. The aim of the study was to assess the phytoaccumulation of selected trace elements (Zn, Cu, Fe, and Mn) in elderberry flowers from the Kuyavian-Pomeranian province (Poland). The enzymatic activity of soils was also assessed in the context of the impact of metals on the biological properties of soils at risk of contamination with trace elements. Soil and plant samples were taken from seven locations with different anthropopressures. Flowers from sites with a high frequency of road traffic were characterized by a greater number of elements (location 1, 3–7) than from areas away from busy roads (location 2). The correlation analysis showed that Cu and Zn contents were highly correlated in the flowers of elderberry as compared to the corresponding soils seven locations with different anthropopressures Regarding the Zn content, only flowers from habitats 1, 2, 7 met the conditions specified in the WHO standard for herbs used in herbal medicine (<50 mg·kg−1). Based on the conducted research, it was found that the level of soil enzymatic activity in the tested soils varied within wide limits but clearly depended on their location. The highest enzyme activity in the soil was found in soil from town center 1 (location 3), where high DHA dehydrogenase DHA (114.5 mg TPF·g−1·24 h−1), fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis FDA (51.26 μg F·g−1·h−1), and β-glucosidases GLUC activity (4.833 μg pNP·g−1·h−1) were determined, as well as in soil from residential area 2 (location 3), where high DHA (165.9 mg TPF·g−1·24 h−1) and FDA (48.23 μg F·g−1·h−1) activity were determined. Analyzing the soil properties, it can be concluded that the content of Cut and Znt in the soil and their forms available for plants, as well as DHA activity, correlates most closely with the content of organic matter.

1. Introduction

The impact of human activity on the environment often results in an increase of trace element contamination in soil and plants. In many urban areas, there are gardens and allotments where vegetables and herbs are grown. This concerns the sustainable use of soils and small-scale food production in suburban areas. Sambucus nigra L. is a widespread species of the Adoxaceae family [1]. This plant can be found throughout Europe but also in Western Asia, Northern Africa, and the USA [2]. The shrubs of elderberry grow to a height of 4–6 m and produce white flowers gathered in umbel-shaped panicles at the tops of the shoots and dark violet drupes that grow in clusters [3]. Due to the shape and color of leaves and flowers, this species is eagerly planted in gardens and parks [4]. In addition to its decorative value, due to the presence of bioactive substances in its tissues, it is used to increase the body’s immunity. Extracts from the tissues of this species are a rich source of specific bioactive substances belonging mainly to the group of flavonoids derived from quercetin (isoquercitrin, hyperoside, and rutoside), kaempferol (astragaline, nicotiflorin), and isorhamnetin 3-G-glucoside and 3-0-rutinoside [5,6]. All parts of this plant can be medicinal raw materials, but the parts most often used are the flowers and fruits, which are obtained from the natural state [6]. While immature berries as well as green leaves and stems contain toxic cyanogenic glycoside and sambunigrin and thus should be avoided in human consumption, the flowers and fully ripe berries have widespread culinary use [7]. In addition, the fruits of the elderberry are rich in other compounds and are valuable for human health; such compounds include vitamins A, B, and C; organic acids; polyphenolic acids; triterpenes; and minerals such as K, Ca, Fe, Mg, P, Na, Zn, Cu, Mn, Se, Cr, Ni, and Cd [5,6,8,9]. Due to their composition, flower extracts can be used as an antipyretic, diaphoretic, vasoconstrictor, and diuretic. Extracts from the tissues of this species also have a cleansing and detoxifying effect on the body and have antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal properties. Therefore, this species is used in the treatment of colds, flu, angina, asthma, measles, and scarlet fever. It is recommended to consume juices and syrups from flowers and fruits in cases of bronchitis, pneumonia, cough, phlegm in the upper respiratory tract, and sore throat [5,6], and there are many medicines and dietary supplements containing S. nigra extract on the pharmaceutical market.
The development of industry, and the technical and technological progress in the world, has led to the pollution of the natural environment with trace metals. These include elements necessary for living organisms, elements that play an unknown physiological role, and toxic elements. Microelements that are necessary for plant growth and development are iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu) and molybdenum (Mo). Other metals, such as mercury (Hg), thallium (Tl), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and cadmium (Cd). They do not have any physiological function in the plant; they are therefore called the so-called ballast elements, and at higher concentrations they may be toxic [10]. Plants have the ability to absorb some heavy metals that are needed for plant biochemistry and physiology, but their higher concentrations may be toxic to plants and the consumer. Long term exposure to heavy metals can cause stress in plants, lipid peroxidation, enzyme inactivation, DNA damage, respiratory inhibition, gas exchange, the limitation of photosynthesis, and the disturbance of water balance. This may cause visible changes in plant morphology, wilting aging, an overall reduction in biomass production, a limited number of seeds, and even plant death [11].
Anthropogenic human activity has led to the excessive accumulation of trace metals in the environment. These elements can accumulate in soil, water, living organisms, and bottom sediments [12,13,14]. Medicinal plants may also accumulate trace metals [14,15,16]. An increase in the concentration of these elements in the tissues of medicinal plants may inhibit the synthesis of biologically active substances and influence changes in the mineral composition of plants, thereby reducing the medicinal value of raw plant material. Very high concentrations of heavy metals may impair human health and even lead to body poisoning and death [16,17]. In the EU countries and in the world, the permissible content of heavy metals in herbal raw materials used in the pharmaceutical industry is regulated by the standards of the European Pharmacopoeia [18] and the requirements of the World Health Organization [19]. The content of trace elements, especially Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu in plant remedies, is not regulated by law. According to the WHO, the permissible lead content in medicinal plants is Pb 10 mg kg−1 d.w. In turn, the provisions of the Polish Pharmacopoeia are more restrictive. According to these standards, the concentration of Pb in herbs should be below 5.0 mg kg−1 d.w. [20].
Enzymes in soils are essential for organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling; they represent soil’s microbial metabolism and its reaction to environmental change. Soil dehydrogenases are often used as an indicator of overall microbial activity in the soil. They take part in soil oxidation and reduction reactions by transferring protons and electrons from substrates to soil organic matter acceptors [21]. Hu et al. [22] proposed that dehydrogenases (DH), which act by dehydrogenating the substrate, can be used as an indicator for assessing heavy metal contamination. Soil hydrolases participate in the degradation of various substrates, making nutrients available to microorganisms and plants. They catalyse nutrient-rich “labile” soil organic matter, which is directly related to meeting the demand for C, N, P, and S elements [23]. The hydrolytic activity of the soil is detected by the hydrolysis of the sodium salt of fluorescein diacetate, which is carried out by various hydrolases such as proteases, lipases, and esterases [24].
Poland is one of the main producers and exporters of herbal ingredients in Europe. An important element of the raw material supply chain is its origin. Its control comes down to monitoring the share of trace elements in the plant material. The aim of the study was to assess the phytoaccumulation of Zn, Cu, Fe, and Mn in elderberry flowers (S. nigra) and the soil of seven locations with different traffic intensity (different degrees of anthropopressure) in the Kuyavian-Pomeranian province (central Poland). The enzymatic activity of soils was also assessed in the context of the impact of metals on the biological properties of soils at risk of contamination with trace elements. Knowledge of soil potential contamination is key to helping communities identify problems with soils and to solving problems so that each plant is healthy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The content of Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe was assessed in elderberry flowers (S. nigra) and soil collected from 7 locations in the city of Bydgoszcz (Poland) and its surroundings (330,000 inhabitants) at the turn of May and June 2021. The places where plant and soil samples were taken, their location, and the degree of traffic intensity in the examined place are presented in Table 1. The control in the experiment was shrubs of S. nigra from suburban location with forest (sampling location 2, from 330 road distance), separated from traffic with trees and dense vegetation.

2.2. Plant Sampling and Analysis Methods

The plant material consisted of the elderberry flowers collected in the full flowering phase. Ten inflorescences were collected from each S. nigra bush. The plants were collected from seven locations at the turn of May and June 2021, dried on paper at room temperature to an air-dry state, and ground in an agate mortar. The homogenized material (300 mg) was microwave-digested in the Speedwave Two mineralizer (Berghof, Eningen, Germany) with the wet mineralization method (5 mL 65% HNO3, 1 mL 30% H2O2). In mineralized plant samples, the total content of Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) with the SOLAAR S4 spectrometer (ThermoElemental, Cambridge, UK). Analyses were performed in three replications.

2.3. Soil Sampling and Analysis Methods

The soil was sampled from the plant root zone (0–25 cm). Additionally, some soil was taken from a depth of 120–150 cm to determine the background metal content. Soil samples were taken at 20 cm from the elderberry trunk. The soil was sieved through a sieve with a mesh diameter of 2 mm, the granulometric composition was determined using the Mastersizer 2000 analyzer (Malvern Instrument, Malvern, UK), the total organic carbon content (TOC) was determined using the Vario Max CN analyzer from Elementar provided by Analysensysteme GmbH (Hanau, Germany), and the pH was determined using the potentiometric method on a pH meter after adding a 1 M KCl solution to the soil samples, at a soil/solution ratio of 1:2.5. The total metal contents were determined applying digestion with HF and HClO4 acid solutions according to the Crock and Severson [25] method. The certified reference materials (TILL–3. the Canadian Certified Reference Materials) were used to verify the accuracy of the results. The recovery rates for the elements were as follows: 98%, 99%, 103%, 97%, and 99% for Zn, Cu, Pb, Mn, and Fe, respectively. Analyses were performed in three replications. The total metal content was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry (ASA) using the SOLAAR S4 spectrometer (ThermoElemental). Dehydrogenase activity (EC 1.1.) was researched by the reduction of 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride via 24 h of incubation in 37 °C according to Thalmann [26]. The reaction product was triphenylformazan, extracted with acetone and assayed at 546 nm in UV-VIS spectrophotometer. The activity of FDA (fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis) (EC 3.) used like an indicator of global soil hydrolysis activity was detected by measuring as described by Adam and Duncan [24]. The researched soil was incubated for 1 h after this time enzymatic reaction was stopped by putting it in a mixture of methyl alcohol and chloroform (1:2). The fluorescein was measured at 490 nm. The soil β-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21) activity was determined according to Eivazi and Tabatabai [27] as a substrate was using p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside. The concentration of p-nitrophenol was determined at 400 nm. The activity of arylsulfatase (EC 3.1.6.1) was analyzed by Tabatabai and Bremner [28] using a substrate p-nitrophenyl-β-D-sulphate. The color product was analyzed by spectrophotometer measure by 420 nm.

2.4. Statistical Analysis and Mathematical Calculations

All the analytical measurements were performed in three replications. Single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. The arithmetic mean values are shown in tables ± standard deviation. The activities of all the enzymes in soil and metal content in elderberry flowers and soil against the background were evaluated using the principal component analysis (PCA). The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) were selected to determine which soil properties differentiate respective sampling sites. The work also used cluster analysis (CA). The cluster analysis allows for the separation of groups of objects based on the differentiation of variables. Ward’s method was used in the cluster analysis. The data were grouped using Euclidean distance [29]. All of the analyses were made using the “Statistica 12.0 for Windows Pl” package [30].
The coefficient of variation (CV) of the parameters was calculated as follows:
CV = (S/X) × 100%.
where CV is the coefficient of variation (%), S is the standard deviation, and X is the arithmetic mean. The values: 0–15%, 16–35%, and >36% indicate low moderate or high variability, respectively [31].
The human activity impact on soils was estimated with the enrichment factor (EF) based on the normalization of the metal measured against a reference metal. Fe was used as the reference element. The values of EF were calculated according to the formula:
EF = [Cn/CnFe]/[Bn/BnFe]
where the Cn is the total content of metal in soil sample; CnFe is the total content of Fe in soil sample; Bn is the content of metal for the geochemical background; and BnFe is the content of Fe for the geochemical background as the reference element [32]. For the calculations, it was assumed that the content of metals in parent material was at the depth of 120–150 cm. Based on value of EF, the categories were determined as <2, deficient to minimal enrichment; 2–5, moderate; 5–20, considerable; 20–40, very high; and >40, extremely high enrichment [33].
The values of the bioconcentration factor (relative content) of Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe in the plant material were calculated following the formula of a ratio of the total content of the elements studied in flowers (CSf) to their content in soil (CSs):
BCFf flowers in S. nigra = CSf flowers/CSs soil.
To evaluate the degree of accumulation of Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe, a four-degree scale provided by Kabata-Pendias et al. [34] was used. The values of the bioconcentration factor (BCF) were interpreted as follows: 0.001–0.01, lack; 0.01–0.1, weak; 0.1–1.0, medium; and 1.0–10.0, intensive of accumulation.

3. Results and Discussion

The tested soils had grain sizes of clayey sands and sandy clay. Soil samples taken from locations 1, 4, and 5 showed sandy clay grain size. These soils contained from 64.9% to 71.6% of sand fraction (2.0–0.05 mm), from 26.5% to 31.8% of silt fraction (0.05–0.002 mm), and from 2.0% to 3.3% of clay fraction (<0.002 mm). In turn, soil samples from locations 2, 3, 6, and 7 showed clayey sand grain size and contained from 73.4% to 80.6% of sand fraction, from 16.7 to 25.3% of the silt fraction, and from 1.0 to 1.3% of the clay fraction (Table 2). Based on the soil analyses, it was found that these soils had a reaction ranging from acidic to alkaline. The organic carbon (TOC) content ranged from 6.51 to 22.4 g·kg−1. The most varied were the TOC content and the clay fraction in the soil, as evidenced by the CV coefficients of 37.3 and 48%, respectively. The soil sample taken from location 2 had the lowest pH value and the lowest TOC content.
The soil in the surface layer showed varying total contents of individual metals (Table 3). The tested soils did not show any contamination with heavy metals in their surface layer. The content of individual metals in soil samples can be ordered as follows: Cut < Znt < Mnt < Fet. The total Fet content in the surface layer of soil ranged from 2.62 g∙kg−1 (location 2) to 7.56 g∙kg−1 (location 3), Cut—from 2.1 mg∙kg−1 (location 2) to 13.8 mg∙kg−1 (location 5), Mnt—from 67.1 mg∙kg−1 (location 2) to 265.4 mg∙kg−1 (location 4), and Znt—from 23.2 (location 2) to 142.0 mg∙kg−1 (location 4). The highest total content of trace elements was determined in soil samples collected close to roads with heavy traffic. Assessing the overall metal content, it can be concluded that they did not exceed the permissible contents provided for in applicable law [36].
The contents of Cua forms available for plants ranged from 0.8 to 3.20 mg kg−1; Fea—from 185.1 to 730.7 mg kg−1; Mna—from 16.4 to 43.0 mg kg−1; and Zna—from 4.2 to 21.0 mg kg−1 (Table 4). As reported by Ociepa [37], the availability of heavy metals to plants is affected by many factors, especially the type of the parent material, the soil reaction and the content of the organic substance, clay minerals, and the interaction with other elements. The greatest variation among the tested metals available for plants was recorded for Zna content (51.5%) (Table 4).
The highest percentage of mobile metal forms in their total content was for Cu and ranged from 20.0% in the soil sample taken from location 7 to 37.0% in sample number 2 (Figure 1).
The EF values indicate a small accumulation (minimum enrichment > 1.5) of Cu and Mn in the surface layer of the tested soils of locations 1 and 5 compared to the content of the geochemical background (Figure 2). The enrichment factor (EF) is used to assess the presence and intensity of anthropogenic contaminant deposition on the surface horizon of soils [38,39,40].
The average metal content in the host rock was 42.4 mg·kg−1 for Zn, 4.97 mg·kg−1 for Cu, 183.8 mg·kg−1 for Mn, and 5.51 g kg−1 for Fe, constituting the geochemical background content of the region’s soils (Table 5).
Ward’s method was used in the cluster analysis. The data was grouped using Euclidean distance [29]. In samples from locations 5 and 6, a similar content of metal forms available for plants and the concentration of metals in the dry matter of plants was found (Figure 3) compared to the remaining samples.
The tested elderberry flowers showed different trace element contents depending on the place where the samples were taken. Based on the results (Table 6), it can be concluded that the concentration of metals in elderberry flowers was in decreasing order: Fe > Zn > Mn > Cu.
Iron is a significant and essential metal for the biochemical and physiological processes of plants but in excess negatively affects plant growth and development, carbon metabolism, enzyme activity, respiration in plants, photosynthetic efficiency, and stress causes oxidative toxicity [41]. In the analyzed plants, the Fef content was determined in the range from 105.8 mg∙kg−1 (location 6) to 281.7 mg∙kg−1 (location 5). These data are similar to the results reported by Kołodziej et al. [42], who detected an iron content of 35.77 mg∙kg−1 to 214.58 mg∙kg−1 in the tested elderberry flowers. These values were lower than those compared to the results reported by other authors. Relatively higher concentrations were obtained by Tomaszewska-Sowa et al. [14] for sand Helichrysum inflorescences (248.6–271.8 mg·kg−1), common yarrow (458–496.5 mg·kg−1), and common nettle (335.1–704.2 mg·kg−1).
Zinc is an essential metal for plants. It has an effect as a cofactor and a component of enzymes, and it is an important factor in the regulation of nitrogen metabolism and photosynthesis. However, excessively high concentrations of Zn are toxic to plants and humans, causing the disruption of several biochemical and physiological processes, causing disturbances in iron metabolism, and resulting in leaf defoliation. Plant species and genotypes vary significantly in their tolerance to high Zn concentrations [43]. The analyzed flower samples contained Znf ranging from 27.1 mg∙kg−1 (location 2) to 57.1 mg∙kg−1 (location 5). According to the World Health Organization [44], the average concentration of Zn in crops ranges from 10 to 100 mg∙kg−1 dry matter. However, the Zn content in shoots in the range of 15–30 mg·kg−1 is sufficient to meet the physiological needs of most plants [45]. This means that all tested plants except location 2 (the suburban location with forest) were characterized by Znf concentration in flowers exceeding the average physiological needs of these plants. Moreover, in elderberry plants obtained from natural locations 3, 4, 5, and 6, the concentration of this element was above the average physiological needs of these plants. The results show that the herbal raw material collected from locations 1, 2, and 7 met the conditions specified in the WHO standard for herbs that are used in herbal medicine. According to this standard, the Zn content cannot exceed 50 mg·kg−1. These results can be compared to the observations presented by Kołodziej et al. [42], who tested samples from 16 locations at various distances from the road and obtained results from 23.92 to 39.29 mg∙kg−1. These values indicate that elderberry flowers collected far from roads in rural areas were characterized by the smallest total content of Zn. The zinc in flower content in S. nigra plants (Znt) was significantly correlated (r = 0.755) with zinc available for plants Zna (Table 9).
Manganese in plants is necessary for the construction of photosynthetic proteins and enzymes and the proper functioning of chloroplasts and photosynthesis. However, its excessive concentration in plant tissues may damage the photosynthetic apparatus and disrupt various processes such as enzyme activity, absorption, translocation, and utilization of mineral elements, causing oxidative stress. The reaction of plants to excess Mn depends on the plant species and variety or genotype [46]. The Mnf content in elderberry flowers ranged from 20 mg∙kg−1 (location 2) to 29.6 mg∙kg−1 (locations 1, 6). This coincides with the research on marshmallow (Allthae officinalis) and marigold (Calendula officinalis) flowers in which Chizzola et al. [47] discovered the Mn content at levels of 21.9 and 21.3 mg∙kg−1, respectively. For comparison, the Mnf content in other species ranged from 27.2 to 247.3 mg·kg−1 [14], 124.3 to 338.6 mg·kg−1 [16], and 75 to 1849 mg·kg−1 [48]. According to Malzahn [49], the concentration of Mnf in plants growing in areas far from the source of pollution ranges from 340 to 1339 mg·kg−1.
Copper has an important function in CO2 assimilation and ATP production in plant cell. It is the main component of proteins important in the photosynthesis process. Excessive Cu concentration in plants inhibits plant growth, causes leaf chlorosis, is cytotoxic, and causes oxidative stress by producing reactive oxygen species [50]. The Cuf content was determined in the range from 3.4 mg∙kg−1 (location 2) to 19.7 mg∙kg−1 (location 5). Similar observations were made by Kołodziej et al. [42], who determined the copper content in elderberry flowers to range from 5.28 to 16.10 mg∙kg−1, and Chizzola et al. [47], who determined the copper content from 6.8 to 16.9 mg∙kg−1 in various plant species. Copper is a metal classified as a microelement in plants, but its excess may be toxic to plants [51]. According to Kabata-Pendias and Pendias [10], the copper content in plants is usually below 4–5 mg·kg−1, and its average content in above-ground parts of plants ranges from 5 to 20 mg·kg−1. The results obtained indicate that only flowers collected from location 5 had the content of this element above the average content. Therefore, this herbal raw material can be recommended as a source of this element in the diet. The greatest variability in plant material collected from seven locations was found in relation to copper content (CV = 49.7%) (Table 6). The relationship shows that the Cuf content was dependent on total Cu (Cut) in soil (r = 0.889) and forms the Cu available for plant (Cua) content in soil (r = 0.947) content (Table 9).
The bioaccumulation index (BCF) values were used to assess the accumulative capacity of flowers collected from various locations. This coefficient determines the plants’ ability to accumulate elements, considering their initial content in the substrate. The higher the values of this indicator, the higher the concentration of the element that is found in the plant biomass in relation to its content in the soil [52]. The values and degree of the bioaccumulation index (BCFf) of Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe in elderberry flowers are presented in Table 7. The values of the bioaccumulation coefficient indicate that elderberry flowers accumulated Cu and Zn to the greatest extent. The tested plant material was characterized by a BCFf value for Cu ranging from 0.96 (location 6) to 2.15 (location 3). In turn, Zn fluctuated in coefficient values from 0.38 (location 4) to 1.17 (locations 1, 2). Based on the data obtained, the degree of Cu and Zn accumulation in plant samples at all sites was determined to be intense or medium. In turn, the Mn accumulation rate was medium, and Fe was low in all of the variants. The BCFf values for Mn ranged from 0.11 (location 4) to 0.30 (location 2), and for Fe from 0.02 (locations 3, 6) to 0.06 (location 5) (Table 7).
Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that this parameter (BCFf) in elderberry flowers differed for the tested elements and was arranged according to the following series: Cu > Zn > Mn > Fe. The total content of metals slightly differentiated the bioaccumulation index of the tested trace elements. Attention is drawn to the lower rates of zinc bioaccumulation in objects with a higher content of this element in the soil, which indicates a lower ability to accumulate Zn in flowers in relation to soil resources (Table 3 and Table 6). Although the element is abundant in soil and can accumulate in flowers to relatively high levels, BCF below 1 can be achieved, as has been demonstrated for Fe and Mn. Depending on the environmental conditions, the values of BCF varied highly depending on trials element and were >1 for Zn and Cu, while they were <1 for Fe and Mn. The observations obtained confirm the research of other authors [53,54,55].
The activity of investigated enzymes was dependent on the sampling location (Table 8). Dehydrogenase was characterized by the greatest diversity of activity. Its activity was within a wide range of 0.234 mg TPF·g−1·24 h−1 (location 2) to 165.9 mg TPF·g−1·24 h−1 (location 6). FDA activity in the soil ranged from 24.18 (location 4) to 51.26 μg F·g−1·h−1 (location 3) (with an average value of 38.42 μg F·g−1·h−1), and in β-glucosides from 0.638 μg pNP·g−1·h−1 (location 2) to 4.833 μg pNP·g−1·h−1 (location 3) (with an average value of 2.473 μg pNP·g−1·h−1). Arylsulfatase takes plays an important role in S cycles because it can catalyze the hydrolysis of organic sulfate esters [28]. According to Fitzgerald [56], the main sources of arylsulfatase are fungi and bacteria, although plants and animals also produce this enzyme. The activity of this enzyme was from 0.028 μg pNP·g−1·h−1 (location 6) to 0.151 μg pNP·g−1·h−1 (location 1). The highest enzyme activity in the soil was found in soil from town center 1 (location 3), where the dehydrogenase activity (114.5 mg TPF·g−1·24 h−1), FDA (51.26 μg F·g−1·h−1), and β -glucosidases (4.833 μg pNP·g−1·h−1) were determined to be high. The activity of arylsulfatase was lower (0.069 μg pNP·g−1·h−1) in this location. It was found that the activity of enzymes in various research centers is influenced by microenvironmental conditions. The studies did not obtain a correlation between enzyme activity and the content of trace elements; similar results were obtained Bream et al. [57].
The reactions of enzymatic activity to heavy metals are very variable in the soil; they depend on differences in the enzymes’ structure and function, but also on the soil properties and on the properties of heavy metals and their concentration [58]. Environmental factors such as soil moisture, oxygen availability, pH, organic matter content, temperature, season, heavy metal pollution, and soil fertilization affect the soil enzymatic activity in the soil environment [59].
Enzymatic reactions are site-specific and depend not only on the level of pollution but also on the abiotic and biotic properties of the soil. Natural parameters (e.g., seasonal changes, geographic location, in situ distribution, physical–chemical properties, and the content of organic matter and clay) usually affect the enzyme activity level by influencing both the production of enzymes by plants and microorganisms and their persistence under natural conditions. According to Olagoke et al. [60], their adsorption is important for enzyme activity. The adsorption of extracellular enzymes to soil minerals protects them against degradation while modifying their activity. Based on the inverse relationships between the amount of adsorbed enzyme and the specific activity of the enzyme and its stability, it was shown that the limited availability of sorption sites is important for high specific activity and stability of enzymes. This is probably a consequence of the smaller and weaker number of bonds compared to the high availability of sorption sites, which results in a smaller effect on the active sites of the enzyme. This concept resulted in a correlation between the activity of dehydrogenases and the clay content (Table 9). In our results, a correlation between dehydrogenases and FDA activity (Table 9, Figure 4) has been observed. This result suggested that the oxidoreduction reactions were connected with hydrolized organic matter (Figure 4). The relationship shows that the Mnt content in soil was dependent on silt (r = 0.765) and Znt (r = 0.839) content. In nutrient available for plants, a relationship was observed between the content of Mna in the soil and Znt (r = 0.933) and Mnt (r = 0.945). However, note that all analyses were performed on originating samples from seven selected locations from the city area of Bydgoszcz (Poland) and its surroundings; therefore, the generalizability of the results is also limited. In order to conduct a thorough analysis, the number of surveyed locations should be increased.
PCA analysis made it possible to determine general relationships between variables and to describe and classify parameters determined by other variables, which allowed for the determination of two main components (PC1 and PC2), which were responsible for over 67% of the variability observed in the soil (Table 10).
Based on Figure 4, it can be concluded that the vectors of variables representing the physical properties of the soil are pH (0.836), sand (−0.815), and silt (0.793); content in the soil of Mnt (0.889) and Znt (0.859); and content in the soil of Mna (0.949), Zna (0.796), and Znf (0.938), grouped according to the first principal component, which is responsible for the percentage of all of the variables. Factor 2 (PC2) showed a high negative correlation with the activity of the enzymes β-glucosidases (−0.936), DHA (−0.825), and FDA (−0.888) and a positive correlation with the content of Fet (−0.785) and Fetg (−0.840) (Table 10). By analyzing the soil properties, it can be concluded that the content of Cut and Znt in the soil and their forms available for plants, as well as DHA activity, correlates most closely with the content of organic matter. DHA plays a key role in the biological oxidation of soil organic matter by transferring hydrogen from organic substrates to inorganic acceptors. A comparison of locations 3 to 6 demonstrates that the soils contained similar contents of Fet and TOC and similar levels of dehydrogenase, glucosidase, and FDA (Figure 4).

4. Conclusions

Monitoring of elderberry flowers from the Kuyavian-Pomeranian province (Poland) showed that heavy metals such as Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe are present in plant tissues. It is worth paying attention to the Zn content in flowers from some locations because they exceed the permissible value. Heavy metal contamination was not recorded in the investigated soils. The total metal content of the soil samples can be ordered as follows: Cu < Zn < Mn < Fe. The highest percentage of mobile metal forms in their total content was for copper. The enrichment factor values indicate a low accumulation (minimum enrichment > 1.5) of Cu and Mn in the surface layer of the investigated soils at locations 1 and 5 compared to the geochemical background content. However, the values of the bioaccumulation factor indicate that elderberry flowers have accumulated Cu and Zn the most.
Flowers from sites with a high frequency of road traffic were characterized by a greater number of elements (location 1, 3–7) than from areas away from busy roads (location 2). The correlation analysis showed that Cu and Zn contents were highly correlated in the flowers of elderberry as compared to the corresponding soils. Depending on the environmental conditions, the values of BCF varied highly depending on the trial element and were >1 for Zn and Cu, while they were <1 for Fe and Mn.
Taking into account that the average concentration of Zn in crop plants ranges from 10 to 100 mg∙kg−1 dry matter (according to the WHO), it can be concluded that the Zn content only in flowers from habitats 1, 2, and 7 met the conditions specified in the standard for herbs used in herbal medicine (<50 mg·kg−1).
The level of soil enzymatic activity in the tested soils varied within wide limits but clearly depended on their location. The highest enzyme activity in the soil was found in soil from town center 1 (location 3), where the DHA, FDA, and GLUC activity was determined to be high, and in the soil from residential area 2 (location 3), the DHA and FDA activity was determined to be high. The content of Cut and Znt in the soil and their forms available for plants, as well as the DHA activity, correlates most closely with the content of organic matter.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F. and M.T.-S.; methodology, A.F., Z.G., M.T.-S., M.K. and A.S.-Z.; software, A.F., A.S.-Z. and M.K.; validation, M.K., A.S.-Z., A.F. and M.T.-S.; formal analysis, A.F., Z.G., M.T.-S., M.K. and A.S.-Z.; investigation, A.F., M.K., A.S.-Z. and M.T.-S.; resources, A.F., M.T.-S., M.K. and A.S.-Z.; data curation, A.F., M.K., A.S.-Z., A.F. and M.T.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.F., Z.G., M.K., A.S.-Z. and M.T.-S.; writing—review and editing, A.F. and M.T.-S.; visualization, A.S.-Z., A.F. and M.K.; supervision, A.F.; project administration, A.F. and A.S.-Z.; and funding acquisition, A.F. and A.S.-Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

FDAfluorescein diacetate hydrolysis activity
DHAdehydrogenase activity
GLUCβ-glucosydase activity
TOCtotal organic carbon in soil
Znttotal Zn in soil
Cuttotal Cu in soil
Mnttotal Mn in soil
Fettotal Fe in soil
Znaavailable Zn for plants
Mnaavailable Mn for plants
Cuaavailable Cu for plants
Feaavailable Fe for plants
Zntgtotal content Zn in parent material
Cutgtotal content Cu in parent material
Mntgtotal content Mn in parent material
Fetgtotal content Fe in parent material
Znf -total Zn in flowers of S. nigra
Cuftotal Cu in flowers of S. nigra
Mnftotal Mn in flowers of S. nigra
Feftotal Fe in flowers of S. nigra
LSloamy sand
BCFbioaccumulation index
BCFfbioaccumulation index metals for flowers S. nigra
Sdstandard deviation
CVcoefficient of variation

References

  1. NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service Classification for Kingdom Plantae Down to Family Caprifoliaceae. 2016. Available online: http://plants.usda.gov/java/ClassificationServlet?source=display&classid=Caprifoliaceae (accessed on 17 November 2016).
  2. Fazio, A.; Plastina, P.; Meijerink, J.; Witkamp, R.F.; Gabriele, B. Comparative analyses of seeds of wild fruits of Rubus and Sambucus species from southern Italy: Fatty acid composition of the oil, total phenolic content, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of the methanolic extracts. Food Chem. 2013, 140, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Krawitz, C.; AbuMraheil, M.; Stein, M.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Domann, E.; Pleschka, S.; Hain, T. Inhibitory activity of a standardized el derberry liquid extract against clinically-relevant human respiratory bacterial pathogens and influenza A and B viruses. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rolbiecki, S.; Rolbiecki, R.; Jagosz, B.; Ptach, W.; Figas, A. Water needs of elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) in first three years of growing in different regions of Poland. In Proceedings of the 17th International Scientific Conference “Engineering for Rural Development”, Jelgava, Latvia, 23–25 May 2018; pp. 733–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Młynarczyk, K.; Walkowiak-Tomczak, D.; Łysiak, G.P. Bioactive properties of Sambucus nigra L. as a functional ingredient for food and pharmaceutical industry. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 40, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nawirska-Olszańska, A.; Oziembłowski, M.; Brandova, P.; Czaplicka, M. Comparison of the Chemical Composition of Selected Varieties of Elderberry with Wild Growing Elderberry. Molecules 2022, 27, 5050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Topolska, J.; Kostecka-Gugała, A.; Ostachowicz, B.; Latowski, D. Selected metal content and antioxidant capacity of Sambucus nigra flowers from the urban areas versus soil parameters and traffic intensity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 668–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mratinić, E.; Fotirić, M. Selection of black elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) and evaluation of its fruits usability as biologically valuable food. Genetika 2007, 39, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nile, S.H.; Park, S.W. Edible berries: Bioactive components and their effect on human health. Nutrition 2014, 30, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kabata-Pendias, A.; Pendias, H. Biogeochemia pierwiastków śladowych; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  11. Karahan, F. Evaluation of Trace Element and Heavy Metal Levels of Some Ethnobotanically Important Medicinal Plants Used as Remedies in Southern Turkey in Terms of Human Health Risk. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 493–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miretzky, P.; Saralegui, A.; Cirelli, A.F. Aquatic macrophytes potential for the simultaneous removal of heavy metals (Buenos Aires. Argentina). Chemosphere 2004, 57, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ibragimow, A.; Głosińska, G.; Siepak, M.; Walna, B. Heavy metals in fluvial sediments of the Odra River flood plains—Introductory research. Quest. Geogr. 2010, 29, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tomaszewska-Sowa, M.; Kobierski, M.; Sawilska, A.K.; Figas, A. Assessment the phytoaccumulation of heavy metals in medicinal plants from the forest areas of Kuyavia-Pomerania provinces. Herba Pol. 2018, 64, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luo, C.; Yang, R.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G.; Li, X. Influence of agricultural practice on trace metals in soils and vegetation in the water conservation area along the East River (Dongjiang River), South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 431, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Figas, A.; Tomaszewska-Sowa, M.; Kobierski, M.; Sawilska, A.K.; Klimkowska, K. Hazard of contamination with heavy metals in Thymus serpyllum L. herbs from rural areas. Agriculture 2021, 11, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kuźniewski, K.; Hojden, B.; Radwan-Pytlewska, K. Wpływ zanieczyszczeń komunikacyjnych na rośliny lecznicze. Herba Pol. 1993, 39, 131–137. [Google Scholar]
  18. Farmakopea Europejska/European Pharmacopoeia 10.0; Komisja Farmakopei Europejskiej: Strasburg, France, 2002; Available online: https://www.edqm.eu/en/european-pharmacopoeia-ph-eur-10th-edition (accessed on 1 January 2020).
  19. WHO—World Health Organization. Guidelines for Assessing Quality of Herbal Medicines with Reference to Contaminants and Residues; WHO Press, World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43510/9789241594448_eng.pdf (accessed on 21 April 2019).
  20. Farmakopea Polska/Polish Pharmacopoeia; X; Urząd Rejestracji Produktów Leczniczych: Warszawa, Poland, 2014; ISBN 978-83-63724-47-4.
  21. Zhang, N.; He, X.D.; Gao, Y.D.; Li, Y.H.; Wang, T.H.; Ma, D.; Zhang, R.; Yang, S. Pedogenic Carbonate and Soil Dehydrogenase Activity In Response To Soil Organic Matter in Artemisia ordosica Community. Pedosphere 2010, 20, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, X.F.; Jiang, Y.; Shu, Y.; Hu, X.; Liu, L.; Luo, F. Effects of mining wastewater discharges on heavy metal pollution and soil enzyme activity of the paddy fields. J. Geochem. Explor. 2014, 147, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aponte, H.; Meli, P.; Butler, B.; Paolini, J.; Matus, F.; Merino, C.; Cornejo, P.; Kuzyakov, Y. Meta-analysis of heavy metal effects on soil enzyme activities. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 737, 139744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Adam, G.; Duncan, H. Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2001, 33, 943–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Crock, J.G.; Severson, R. Four reference soil and rock samples for measuring element availability in the western energy regions. U.S. Geol. Surv. Circ. 1980, 841, 16. [Google Scholar]
  26. Thalmann, A. Zur Methodik der Bestimmung der Dehydrogenaseaktivität im Boden mittels Triphenyltetrazoliumchlorid (TTC). Landwirtsch. Forsch. 1968, 21, 249–258. [Google Scholar]
  27. Eivazi, F.; Tabatabai, M.A. Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1988, 20, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tabatabai, M.A.; Bremner, J.M. Factors Affecting Soil Arylsulfatase Activity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1970, 34, 427–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ward, J.H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963, 58, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. StatSoft Inc. OK, USA, STATISTICA, Version 12.0. Data Analysis Software System 2012. Available online: https://statisticasoftware.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/statsoft-releases-version-12-of-statistica-software (accessed on 7 May 2013).
  31. Wilding, L.P. Spatial variability: Its documentation. accommodation and implication to soil surveys. In Soil Spatial Variability; Nielsen, D.R., Bouma, J., Eds.; Pudoc: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1985; pp. 166–194. [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin, J.M.; Meybeck, M. Elemental Mass-Balance of Material Carried by Major World Rivers. Mar. Chem. 1979, 7, 173–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sutherland, R.A.; Tolosa, C.A.; Tack, F.M.G.; Verloo, M.G. Characterization of Selected Element Concentration and Enrichment Ratios in Background and Anthropogenically Impacted Roadside Areas. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 38, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kabata-Pendias, A.; Motowiecka-Terelak, T.; Piotrowska, M.; Terlak, H.; Witek, T. Ocena stopnia zanieczyszczenia gleb metalami ciężkimi i siarką. In Ramowe Wytyczne dla Rolnictwa; IUNG: Puławy, Poland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  35. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). Soil Mechanics Level I-Module 3: USDA Textural Classification Study Guide; National Employee Development Staff; Soil Conservation Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  36. Journal of Laws. Item 1395. Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 1 September 2016 on the Method for Assessment of Land Surface Contamination.; 2016. Available online: www.gdos.gov.pl (accessed on 5 September 2016). (In Polish)
  37. Ociepa, E. The effect of fertilization on yielding and heavy metals uptake by maize and virgina fanpetals (Sida hermaphrodita). Arch. Environ. Prot. 2011, 37, 123–129. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kobierski, M.; Dąbkowska-Naskręt, H. Local Background Concentration of Heavy Metals in Various Soil Types Formed from Glacial Till of the Inowrocławska Plain. J. Elem. 2012, 17, 559–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barbieri, M. The Importance of Enrichment Factor (EF) and Geoaccumulation Index (Igeo) to Evaluate the Soil Contamination. J. Geol. Geophys. 2016, 5, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kobierski, M.; Tomaszewska-Sowa, M.; Figas, A.; Gatz, A.; Sawilska, A.K. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in herbal plants from areas not exposed to heavy anthropopressure. Pol. J. Soil Sci. 2017, 50, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zahra, N.; Hafeez, M.B.; Shaukat, K.; Wahid, A.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Fe toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 201–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kołodziej, B.; Maksymiec, N.; Drożdżal, K.; Antonkiewicz, J. Effect of traffic pollution on chemical composition of raw elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.). J. Elem. 2012, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Long, X.X.; Yang, X.E.; Ni, W.Z.; Ye, Z.Q.; He, Z.L.; Calvert, D.V.; Stoffella, J.P. Assessing Zinc Thresholds for Phytotoxicity and Potential Dietary Toxicity in Selected Vegetable Crops. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2003, 34, 1421–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. WHO—World Health Organization. Zinc. Environmental Health Criteria; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ociepa-Kubicka, A.; Ociepa, E. Toksyczne oddziaływanie metali ciężkich na rośliny, zwierzęta i ludzi. Inżynieria i Ochrona środowiska 2012, 15, 169–180. [Google Scholar]
  46. Millaleo, R.; Reyes-Diaz, M.; Ivanov, A.G.; Mora, M.L.; Alberdi, M. Manganese as essential and toxic element for plants: Transport, accumulation and resistance mechanisms. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2010, 10, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chizzola, R.; Michitsch, H.; Franz, C. Monitoring of metallic micronutrients and heavy metals in herbs, spices and medicinal plants from Austria. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2003, 216, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Parzych, A.; Sobisz, Z.; Trojanowski, J. Prognosis content of heavy metals in soil and herbaceous plants in selected of pine forest in the Słowiński National Park. Arch. Environ. Prot. 2012, 38, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Malzahn, E. Monitoring zagrożeń i zanieczyszczenia środowiska leśnego Puszczy Białowieskiej. Kosmos 2002, 51, 435–444. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kumar, V.; Pandita, S.; Sidhu, G.P.S.; Sharma, A.; Khanna, K.; Kaur, P.; Shreeya Bali, A.; Setia, R. Copper bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and tolerance in plants: A comprehensive review. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 127810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Cegielska, W.; Michalska-Kacymirow, M.; Wierzbicka, M. Metale ciężkie w środowisku. In Ekotoksykologia: Rośliny, Gleby, Metale; Wierzbicka, M., Ed.; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego: Warszawa, Poland, 2015; pp. 22–51. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ociepa, E.; Pachura, P.; Ociepa-Kubicka, A. Wpływ niekonwencjonalnego nawożenia na migrację metali ciężkich w układzie gleba-roślina. Inżynieria i Ochrona Środowiska 2014, 17, 325–338. [Google Scholar]
  53. Strączynski, S. Bioakumulacja mikroelementów w grochu siewnym uprawianym w rejonie zanieczyszczonym przez hutnictwo miedzi. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych 2004, 502, 987–994. [Google Scholar]
  54. Frankowska, A.; Ziołkowska, J.; Bielawski, L.; Falandysz, J. Profile and bioconcentration of minerals by King Bolete (Boletus edulis) from the Płocka Dale in Poland. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2010, 3, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, X.M.; Zhang, J.; Li, T.; Wang, Y.Z.; Liu, H.G. Content and bioaccumulation of nine mineral elements in ten mushroom species of the genus Boletus. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2015, 2015, 165412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Fitzgerald, J.W. Naturally occurring organosulfur compounds in soil. In Sulfur in the Environment; Part II. Ecological Impacts; Nriagu, J.O., Ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1978; pp. 391–443. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bream, A.S.; Surtasi, E.I.E.; Mahmoud, M.A.; Hamza, Y.I. Industrial Pollution Evaluation through Enzymatic Biomarkers at Different Localities of El-Sadat Industrial City, Menofia, Egypt. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 12, 19–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kandeler, E.; Tscherko, D.; Bruce, K.D.; Stemmer, M.; Amelung, W. Structure and function of the soil microbial community in microhabitats of a heavy metal polluted soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2000, 32, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wolińska, A.; Stępniewska, Z. Dehydrogenase Activity in the Soil Environment. In Dehydrogenase; Canuto, R.A., Ed.; INTECH Publisher: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 183–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Olagoke, F.K.; Kaiser, K.; Mikutta, R.; Kalbitz, K.; Vogel, C. Persistent Activities of Extracellular Enzymes Adsorbed to Soil Minerals. Microorganisms 2012, 8, 1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Percentage of mobile forms in the total metal content; sampling locations: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7—explanations as in Table 1. a—content of forms available for plants; t—total contents of metals; and Sd—standard deviation.
Figure 1. Percentage of mobile forms in the total metal content; sampling locations: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7—explanations as in Table 1. a—content of forms available for plants; t—total contents of metals; and Sd—standard deviation.
Sustainability 16 04641 g001
Figure 2. Values of enrichment factor (EF) for Zn, Cu, and Mn; sampling locations: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7—explanations as in Table 1.
Figure 2. Values of enrichment factor (EF) for Zn, Cu, and Mn; sampling locations: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7—explanations as in Table 1.
Sustainability 16 04641 g002
Figure 3. Cluster analysis for forms of metals available for plants and metal content in plants; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7—sampling location: explanations as in Table 1.
Figure 3. Cluster analysis for forms of metals available for plants and metal content in plants; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7—sampling location: explanations as in Table 1.
Sustainability 16 04641 g003
Figure 4. Configuration of variables in the system of the first two axes PC1 and PC2 of principal components. Abbreviations: FDA—fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis activity; DHA—dehydrogenase activity; GLUC—β-glucosydase activity; ARYL—arylsulphatase activity; TOC—total organic carbon in soil; Znt—total Zn in soil; Cut—total Cu in soil; Mnt—total Mn in soil; Fet—total Fe in soil; Zna—available Zn for plants; Mna—available Mn for plants; Cua—available Cu for plants; Fea—available Fe for plants; Zntg—total content Zn in parent material; Cutg—total content Cu in parent material; Mntg—total content Mn in parent material; Fetg—total content Fe in parent material; Znf—total Zn in flowers of S. nigra; Cuf—total Cu in flowers of S. nigra; Mnf—total Mn in flowers of S. nigra; and Fef—total Fe in flowers of S. nigra.; 1–7 is sampling location.
Figure 4. Configuration of variables in the system of the first two axes PC1 and PC2 of principal components. Abbreviations: FDA—fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis activity; DHA—dehydrogenase activity; GLUC—β-glucosydase activity; ARYL—arylsulphatase activity; TOC—total organic carbon in soil; Znt—total Zn in soil; Cut—total Cu in soil; Mnt—total Mn in soil; Fet—total Fe in soil; Zna—available Zn for plants; Mna—available Mn for plants; Cua—available Cu for plants; Fea—available Fe for plants; Zntg—total content Zn in parent material; Cutg—total content Cu in parent material; Mntg—total content Mn in parent material; Fetg—total content Fe in parent material; Znf—total Zn in flowers of S. nigra; Cuf—total Cu in flowers of S. nigra; Mnf—total Mn in flowers of S. nigra; and Fef—total Fe in flowers of S. nigra.; 1–7 is sampling location.
Sustainability 16 04641 g004
Table 1. Places of collecting plant and soil samples.
Table 1. Places of collecting plant and soil samples.
Sampling
Location
The Place Where the Material Is CollectedLocationDistance to RoadThe Degree of TrafficIntensity *
1a suburb53°01′31.7″ N 17°53′10.6″ E40 mb
2suburban location with forest (control)53°08′12.1″ N 17°48′46.4″ E330 ma
3Bydgoszcz city (town center 1)53°08′04.4″ N 18°02′08.4″ E5 mc
4Bydgoszcz city (residential area 1)53°07′15.8″ N 18°01′59.4″ E4 mc
5Bydgoszcz city (old town center)53°07′15.6″ N 18°00′23.1″ E6 mc
6Bydgoszcz city (residential area 2)53°09′59.2″ N 18°09′48.1″ E20 mb
7Bydgoszcz city (town center 2)53°09′58.1″ N 18°02′40.1″ E15 mb
* a—places away from road traffic; b—places with medium traffic intensity; and c—places with heavy traffic.
Table 2. Selected properties of soil samples (0–25 cm).
Table 2. Selected properties of soil samples (0–25 cm).
Sampling
Location *
pH
1 M KCl
TOC
g kg−1
Grain Size Composition [%]Textural
Class
USDA **
Sand
2.0–0.05
mm
Silt
0.05–0.002
mm
Clay
<0.002
mm
16.54 ± 0.0411.0 ± 0.2271.626.42.0SL
24.03 ± 0.036.51 ± 0.3080.618.31.1LS
35.86 ± 0.0522.4 ± 0.2177.121.71.2LS
46.77 ± 0.0616.1 ± 0.2064.931.83.3SL
56.47 ± 0.0211.3 ± 0.2270.027.92.1SL
66.70 ± 0.0812.8 ± 0.2373.425.31.3LS
76.56 ± 0.0512.6 ± 0.2280.316.71.0LS
mean6.1313.273.9824.011.71
Sd0.974.955.745.390.82
CV (%)15.837.37.7622.548.0
* sampling location explanations as in Table 1; TOC—total organic carbon in soil; SL—sandy loam; LS—loamy sand; Sd—standard deviation; CV—coefficient of variation; and ** USDA [35].
Table 3. Total content of metals (Znt, Cut, Pbt, Mnt, and Fet) in topsoil (0–25 cm).
Table 3. Total content of metals (Znt, Cut, Pbt, Mnt, and Fet) in topsoil (0–25 cm).
Sampling Location *ZntCutMntFet
mg·kg−1g kg−1
132.1 ± 1.256.7 ± 0.25127.1 ± 10.113.02 ± 0.11
223.2 ± 1.452.1 ± 0.0867.1 ± 4.122.62 ± 0.09
389.4 ± 1.264.6 ± 0.21166.3 ± 14.117.56 ± 0.13
4142.0 ± 2.255.5 ± 0.25265.4 ± 24.005.35 ± 0.06
5104.2 ± 1.4213.8 ± 1.25162.5 ± 11.164.44 ± 0.10
6116.8 ± 1.909.2 ± 0.08150.0 ± 13.096.00 ± 0.05
791.1 ± 1.255.5 ± 0.15128.85.09 ± 0.10
mean85.56.77152.44.86
Sd43.403.7659.91.71
CV (%)50.755.739.335.0
* sampling location explanations as in Table 1; t—total contents of metals; Sd—standard deviation; and CV—coefficient of variation.
Table 4. Content of metals (Zna, Cua, Pba, Mna, and Fea) available for plants (0–25 cm).
Table 4. Content of metals (Zna, Cua, Pba, Mna, and Fea) available for plants (0–25 cm).
Sampling Location *ZnaCuaMnaFea
mg·kg−1
14.2 ± 0.081.8 ± 0.0225.5 ± 1.44482.0 ± 22.05
25.1 ± 0.090.8 ± 0.0116.4 ± 1.22185.1 ± 20.08
39.5 ± 3.081.7 ± 0.0328.9 ± 1.50730.7 ± 19.05
421.0 ± 2.201.3 ± 0.0843.0 ± 1.41355.0 ± 12.15
513.2 ± 0.163.2 ± 0.1633.0 ± 0.90370.1 ± 16.17
614.7 ± 0.131.9 ± 0.0534.1 ± 1.60412.9 ± 22.20
711.0 ± 0.101.1 ± 0.0228.3 ± 1.05298.8 ± 30.30
mean11.241.6729.88404.9
Sd5.790.778.21171.0
CV (%)51.546.127.542.2
* sampling location explanations as in Table 1; a—content of forms available for plants (1 M HCl); Sd—standard deviation; and CV—coefficient of variation.
Table 5. Total content of metals (Zntg, Cutg, Pbtg, Mntg, and Fetg) in parent material (120–150 cm).
Table 5. Total content of metals (Zntg, Cutg, Pbtg, Mntg, and Fetg) in parent material (120–150 cm).
Sampling Location *ZntgCutgMntgFetg
mg·kg−1g kg−1
127.5 ± 3.085.2 ± 0.08250.2 ± 11.124.24 ± 0.07
222.8 ± 2.182.0 ± 0.03145.0 ± 9.183.25 ± 0.03
365.4 ± 4.074.4 ± 0.07150.3 ± 10.126.89 ± 0.08
453.4 ± 5.083.3 ± 0.06230.4 ± 21.085.25 ± 0.09
542.7 ± 4.027.2 ± 0.10220.4 ± 23.123.98 ± 0.03
637.5 ± 3.127.7 ± 0.12182.3 ± 11.008.45 ± 0.12
747.5 ± 3.085.0 ± 0.07108.0 ± 13.146.54 ± 0.10
mean42.44.97183.85.51
Sd14.752.0252.11.86
CV (%)34.840.628.333.7
* sampling location explanations as in Table 1; tg—total content of metals in parent material; Sd—standard deviation; and CV—coefficient of variation.
Table 6. Content of metals (Znf, Cuf, Mnf, and Fef) in dry weight of flowers S. nigra.
Table 6. Content of metals (Znf, Cuf, Mnf, and Fef) in dry weight of flowers S. nigra.
Sampling Location *ZnfCufMnfFef
mg·kg−1
137.5 ± 4.0510.6 ± 2.1029.6 ± 7.10115.0 ± 17.10
227.1 ± 3.083.4 ± 1.1220.0 ± 5.11140.0 ± 20.13
351.3 ± 5.089.9 ± 2.1323.2 ± 4.10168.3 ± 21.10
453.8 ± 3.1210.2 ± 2.0028.3 ± 5.18185.8 ± 18.20
557.1 ± 7.1019.7 ± 3.1022.1 ± 4.22281.7 ± 24.40
653.3 ± 6.118.8 ± 1.0629.6 ± 6.00105.8 ± 17.60
739.2 ± 7.007.2 ± 1.1527.5 ± 4.34243.3 ± 30.41
mean45.619.9725.76177.1
Sd11.114.953.9165.57
CV (%)24.349.715.237.0
* sampling location explanations as in Table 1; f—flowers; Sd—standard deviation; and CV—coefficient of variation.
Table 7. Values of bioaccumulation index (BCFf) metals (Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe) for flowers S. nigra.
Table 7. Values of bioaccumulation index (BCFf) metals (Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe) for flowers S. nigra.
Sampling Location *Bioaccumulation Index (BCFf)
ZnCuMnFe
11.171.580.230.04
Accumulationintensiveintensivemediumweak
21.171.620.300.05
Accumulationintensiveintensivemediumweak
30.572.150.140.02
Accumulationmediumintensivemediumweak
40.381.850.110.03
Accumulationmediumintensivemediumweak
50.551.430.140.06
Accumulationmediumintensivemediumweak
60.460.960.200.02
Accumulationmediummediummediumweak
70.431.310.210.05
Accumulationmediumintensivemediumweak
* sampling location explanations as in Table 1; BCFf (bioaccumulation index)—a ratio of the total content of the elements (Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe) studied in flowers (CSf) to their content in soil (CSs).
Table 8. The enzyme activity in topsoil (0–25 cm).
Table 8. The enzyme activity in topsoil (0–25 cm).
Sampling Location *DHA
mgTPF·g−1·24 h−1
FDA
μg F·g−1·h−1
GLUC
μg pNP·g−1·h−1
ARYL
μg pNP·g−1·h−1
120.70 ± 0,2434,89 ± 0.091.517 ± 0.040.151 ± 0.06
20.234 ± 0.0040.32 ± 0.670.638 ± 0.020.054 ± 0.01
3114.5 ± 1.5251.26 ± 0.584.833 ± 0.020.069 ± 0.03
414.65 ± 0.2924.18 ± 0.481.532 ± 0.050.140 ± 0.00
52.38 ± 0.0528.76 ± 0.451.579 ± 0.030.081 ± 0.01
6165.9 ± 5.7348.23 ± 0.463.461 ± 0.080.028 ± 0.00
731.40 ± 0.4141.31 ± 1.413.748 ± 0.220.082 ± 0.01
mean49.9638.422.4730.06
Sd64.279.8461.5350.044
CV (%)1.290.260.620.51
* sampling location explanations as in Table 1. Abbreviations: DHA—dehydrogenase activity; FDA—fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis activity; GLUC—β-glucosydase activity; and ARYL—arylsulphatase activity.
Table 9. Correlation coefficient (r), and linear regression models for selected properties of soils and flowers S. nigra of Bydgoszcz agglomeration.
Table 9. Correlation coefficient (r), and linear regression models for selected properties of soils and flowers S. nigra of Bydgoszcz agglomeration.
Variables Dependent (y)Variables Independent (x)Regression Equationr
FDA *clayy = 55.787− 10.13x−0.847
GLUCFety = −1.312 + 0.77744x0.864
FDADHAy = −140.5 + 4.9580x0.759
pHMnay = 4.5106 + 0.01064x0.792
FetTOCy = 0.55936 + 2.6055x0.899
FeaTOCy = 3.3644 + 0.02440x0.843
ZntgTOCy = 507.853 + 207.646x0.927
Mntsandy = 114.37 − 10.142x−0.811
Mnasandy = 75.516 − 0.4476x−0.799
Mntgsandy = 769.73 − 7.920x−0.873
Mntclayy = 17.700 +7.1084x0.807
Mntgclayy = 98.346 + 49.848x0.788
Mntsilty = 51.61+8.4979x0.765
Mntgsilty = −24.63 + 8.6796x0.898
MntZnty = −7.061+ 0.60741x0.839
MnaZnty = 14.802 + 0.17633x0.933
ZnaZnty = 4.7889 + 7.1827x0.959
ZnfZnty = −67.98 + 3.3656x0.861
MnaMnty = 10.154 + 0.12943x0.945
CuaCuty = 0.37264 + 0.19391x0.939
CufCuty = 0.20306 + 0.14869x0.889
ZnfZnay = −6.720 + 0.39380x0.755
CufCuay = 0.20306 + 0.14869x0.947
* FDA—fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis activity; DHA—dehydrogenase activity; GLUC—β-glucosydase activity; ARYL—arylsulphatase activity; TOC—total organic carbon in soil; Znt—total Zn in soil; Cut—total Cu in soil; Mnt—total Mn in soil; Fet—total Fe in soil; Zna—available Zn for plants; Mna—available Mn for plants; Cua—available Cu for plants; Fea—available Fe for plants; Zntg—total content Zn in parent material; Cutg—total content Cu in parent material; Mntg—total content Mn in parent material; Fetg—total content Fe in parent material; Znf—total Zn in flowers of S. nigra; Cuf—total Cu in flowers of S. nigra; Mnf—total Mn in flowers of S. nigra; and Fef—total Fe in flowers of S. nigra.
Table 10. Values of the two extracted factor loadings (25 elements).
Table 10. Values of the two extracted factor loadings (25 elements).
ParametersComponents Matrix
PC1PC2
DHA *0.23915−0.824650
FDA−0.36749−0.887678
GLUC0.23677−0.935761
ARYL0.289640.614312
pH0.83626−0.060163
TOC0.56495−0.596703
sand−0.81542−0.507023
silt0.792820.480383
clay0.666320.641000
Znt0.85912−0.219253
Cut0.618330.182219
Mnt0.888870.083688
Fet0.56613−0.784938
Zna0.79600−0.009938
Cua0.578730.159622
Mna0.948880.016539
Fea0.40328−0.533773
Zn tg0.60388−0.531174
Cutg0.52577−0.217531
Mntg0.530370.658673
Fetg0.37308−0.839651
Znf0.93802−0.184858
Cuf0.694870.286634
Mnf0.44820−0.071375
Fef0.293040.159350
* FDA—fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis activity; DHA—dehydrogenase activity; GLUC—β-glucosydase activity; ARYL—arylsulphatase activity; TOC—total organic carbon in soil; Znt—total Zn in soil; Cut—total Cu in soil; Mnt—total Mn in soil; Fet—total Fe in soil, Zna—available Zn for plants; Mna—available Mn for plants; Cua—available Cu for plants; Fea—available Fe for plants; Zntg—total content Zn in parent material; Cutg—total content Cu in parent material; Mntg—total content Mn in parent material; Fetg—total content Fe in parent material; Znf—total Zn in flowers of S. nigra; Cuf—total Cu in flowers of S. nigra; Mnf—total Mn in flowers of S. nigra; and Fef—total Fe in flowers of S. nigra.; In bold is statistical significance.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Figas, A.; Kobierski, M.; Siwik-Ziomek, A.; Tomaszewska-Sowa, M.; Gruszka, Z. Anthropression as a Factor Affecting the Content of Heavy Metals in the Flowers of Sambucus nigra L.—A Medicinal Plant Affecting Human Health. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114641

AMA Style

Figas A, Kobierski M, Siwik-Ziomek A, Tomaszewska-Sowa M, Gruszka Z. Anthropression as a Factor Affecting the Content of Heavy Metals in the Flowers of Sambucus nigra L.—A Medicinal Plant Affecting Human Health. Sustainability. 2024; 16(11):4641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114641

Chicago/Turabian Style

Figas, Anna, Mirosław Kobierski, Anetta Siwik-Ziomek, Magdalena Tomaszewska-Sowa, and Zofia Gruszka. 2024. "Anthropression as a Factor Affecting the Content of Heavy Metals in the Flowers of Sambucus nigra L.—A Medicinal Plant Affecting Human Health" Sustainability 16, no. 11: 4641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114641

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop