Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Sustainable Supply Chain Network for Perishable Products
Previous Article in Journal
Flash Flood Simulation for Hilly Reservoirs Considering Upstream Reservoirs—A Case Study of Moushan Reservoir
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Consumption Preferences for Truffles and Truffle-Based Products: An Application of the PLS-SEM Model

by
Valentina Rosa Laganà
*,
Fabio Lombardi
,
Donatella Di Gregorio
and
Agata Nicolosi
Department of Agraria, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(12), 5002; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125002
Submission received: 23 April 2024 / Revised: 5 June 2024 / Accepted: 9 June 2024 / Published: 12 June 2024

Abstract

:
The truffle is a niche, valuable and ecological product exported and consumed all over the world. However, little is known about consumers’ preferences for truffles and truffle products. This study empirically explores the factors influencing their consumption in Italy. A PLS-SEM model was implemented and validated using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior, including consumers’ food-specific curiosity as an additional construct to basic constructs such as attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control. The analysis allowed us to examine and verify the significance of the relationships between the factors and what impact they have on intentions to consume fresh and truffle-based products. The processing concerns of consumers were reached through face-to-face consultation with a semi-structured questionnaire. The results obtained suggested that consumers’ intentions in using truffles involve several factors, such as consumers’ personal experiences, organoleptic characteristics (aroma and taste), food safety, trust in the seller/brand, traceability information, the aspect of green products and, more generally, the protection of the environment and forests. The findings provided novel insights for researchers to understand the aspects of truffle consumption, and also represent a guideline for marketers to develop appropriate marketing tactics to grow the truffle business.

1. Introduction

Strengthening resilience, halting the loss of biodiversity and building a healthy and sustainable food system are practices which have already been highlighted for some time, and have become essential priorities following the crisis triggered by COVID-19, which has shown the fragility of the food system [1,2]. The pandemic highlighted the value of rural areas for the well-being of the whole society and their specific contribution in tackling the climate crisis. The post-2020 Community Agricultural Policy (CAP) supports farmers and rural communities in facing the difficulties and challenges inherent to innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural development, with the aim of creating synergies between different policy programs at both EU and Member State levels [3].
Moreover, within the main aims of the 2021-27 PNR, particular importance was attributed to the multifunctional role of forests, supporting the valorization of non-timber forest products, but also giving particular care to the value of the intangible forest services through the application of nature-based solutions (NBS) [4,5]. Implementing innovations aimed to improve the conditions of agricultural and rural populations is a task entirely in line with the desired development and growth processes promoted by the CAP.
In recent years, interest in truffles (valuable mushrooms) has increased, for both spontaneously grown truffles and those cultivated in artificial truffle grounds. In the latter case, new income opportunities are promoted for the various operators in the supply chain [6], supporting the recovery and valorization of marginal territories and inner areas [7], which can also happen through the promotion of the potential links with food and wine tourism.
Huber et al. [6] argued that non-timber forest products (NWFP) play a fundamental role in the provision of forest ecosystem services, highlighting how, in the cases observed in Europe, NWFP products offer opportunities to forestry companies willing to manage a combination of woody and non-woody resources. Furthermore, sustainable co-production can support the appropriate management of agro-forest ecosystems across Europe. Truffles and truffle products therefore represent a valuable option for sustainable food supply.
Huber et al. [6] also pointed out that wild mushrooms and truffles strengthen the economic vitality of rural and inner areas, constituting the most widespread opportunity to increase additional income deriving from forest management for non-woody products.
Büntgen et al. [8] focused on the emerging Spanish black truffle industry. After having highlighted the economic crises that many European rural areas are experiencing and which overlap with the long-term negative effects of climate change, they focused on aspects linked to the potential of micro-tourism. They also suggested that micro-tourism, through the use of qualified guides and the promotion of restaurants serving mushrooms, truffles and local products, can compensate for the related economic losses deriving from unemployment and production reductions induced by summer drought, therefore promoting sustainability and the conservation of biological diversity.
In awareness of this growing importance of truffle cultivation and its use in the gastronomic sector in marginal and inner European areas, our study examines the importance of knowing consumers’ preferences, attitudes and consumption motivations, and also suggesting appropriate marketing actions.
On the other hand, in 2021 Oliach [9] was already encouraging the promotion of truffle consumption, due to the increase in cultivated truffle plantations; he underlined the importance of the emergence of truffle hunters who collect on behalf of farmers and specialized wholesalers, while the number of collectors who search for truffles to sell them to small itinerant buyers significantly decreased.
Consequentially, the application of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), as described in Ajzen’s work [10], can provide a tool for exploring consumption behaviors. The multidimensionality of consumers’ eating behaviors has led many authors in the literature to extend the constructs by including others in the applied models [11,12]. At present, however, the objective and subjective knowledge, socio-demographic profiles and lifestyle that influence the consumption of truffles and truffle products are still little explored. As a consequence, this study represents, as far as we know, the first empirical exploration of Italian consumers’ preferences on truffles and truffle products. Our findings will improve the understanding of consumer preferences for these niche products, offering valuable information to the supply chain operators in order to develop tailor-made strategies to effectively meet consumer expectations.
In Italy, the truffle market is very fragmented and characterized by a multitude of small operators (pickers, artificial truffle growers, distributors, restaurateurs, etc.). No official data are available on the real amounts of truffles collected each year, especially in relation to the type of sale and negotiation. Many transactions are still carried out at a local scale in the main production regions and, in many cases, occasional sales of small quantities directed to the final consumer are considered. The demand for truffles is mainly linked to the catering, processing and tourism industries; it is highly seasonal, reaching a peak in the months of October–November, when the most truffle harvesting occurs.
Focusing on truffle prices, the economic activity of the truffle sector generates tens of millions of Euros annually. We discuss average retail prices, as reported below, referring to the last decade: Tuber Magnatum Pico between 1500.00 and 4000.00 EUR/Kg at retail price and between 800.00 and 2000.00 EUR/Kg wholesale; Tuber Uncinatum Vitt truffle between 300.00 and 500.00 EUR/kg at retail and 150.00 and 250.00 EUR/kg at wholesale level; Tuber Aestivum Vitt between 100.00 and 300.00 EUR/Kg at retail and 40.00 and 150.00 EUR/Kg wholesale; and finally the Tuber Melanosporum truffle, which ranges from 400.00 to 1000.00 EUR/Kg at retail and 200.00 to 600.00 EUR/Kg wholesale. The prices cited above are indicative, since they strongly fluctuate; however, these “random” prices make the search and purchase of the precious underground mushroom an attractive experience [9]. Oliach et al. [9,13] affirm that, during the last few decades, the European market has undergone changes due to the cultivation of truffles. New producers have appeared in a traditional sector linked to wild production, and new business opportunities have emerged through online sales, giving more visibility to the truffle.
Recently, many authors [14,15] have focused on the “rethinking consumption” approach to interpret consumption as a complex practice and as a combination of elements of choice and consumption habits [16,17] both from the emotional point of view of rational choices, which influence the consumer towards practices of sustainable consumption [18], and in relation to know-how. Truffle farms can allow the valorization of marginal and inner areas, promoting new employment and income opportunities and also supporting gastronomic tourism, which revolves around the production of truffles and truffle-based gastronomy (fresh and/or processed). Thanks to their high cultural and gastronomic prestige, various species of truffles are appreciated all over the world for their high nutritional value, bioactive compounds and prestigious aroma.
The aim of this research work is to explore motivations and preferences for the consumption of truffles and truffle-based products. The study was conducted through a survey of consumers in Italy through face-to-face interviews.
In the context of food consumption literature, many studies have applied the predictive power of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) [10,19] to investigate consumers’ intentions regarding healthy behaviors [20,21], healthy eating, environmental protection behavior and the consumption of organic foods. The approach aims to understand the processes that lead individuals to intentional behavior in their consumption choices.
Other studies have added constructs to the TPB by expanding it with additional variables to explain the greater variation in personal conduct and consumption intentions [2,22,23,24].
TPB provides basic constructs, which are intention (INT) to carry out that specific act of consumption, attitude (ATT), subjective norm (SN) and perceived behavioral control (PBC). All these factors are determined by behavioral, normative and control beliefs, respectively. In the literature, several studies extend these constructs, such as awareness of sustainability, moral attitudes, health consciousness, territorial identity and recently also the impact of COVID-19 on purchasing intentions [2,22,23,25]. Also, our study extended the TPB framework by adding the food-specific curiosity (SGAC) construct in addition to the TPB core theory constructs.
To identify which drivers influence consumers in the process of choosing truffles to be purchased/consumed, an exploratory factorial analysis (EFA) was carried out based on the analysis of the main components (PCA).
To identify the factors that influence the propensity to consume truffles, a structural equation model (PLS-SEM) was implemented using a self-administered questionnaire.
This model represents one of the most widespread methodologies in the analysis of behavioral data, as it allows us to study the interrelationships between variables that are not directly measurable, called latent variables or factors. PLS-SEM was used to test the following research questions:
-
Which factors determine the intention to consume truffles and truffle-based products?
-
Which are the main personal behaviors and attitudes that guide the choice to consume truffles and truffle-based products?
-
Is gastronomic curiosity a relevant factor in the intention to consume truffles and truffle products?
-
Is food safety important when planning to consume truffles and truffle-based products?
-
Does the approval of family members and acquaintances count in the intention to consume these niche products?
This paper is organized as follows: the introductory section is followed by a literature review on the truffle market and the state of the art. Subsequently, the methodological approach adopted for consumer analyses is illustrated and the results obtained are outlined. The paper concludes with discussions and conclusions.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Description of the Research Object: Truffle

The truffles of the Tuber genus are the most interesting forest products from an ecological, hydrogeological and economic point of view. Specific growing habitats, unpredictable growth patterns and growing seasons, unique harvesting methods, limited natural resources and a limited shelf life make truffles one of the most expensive foods in the world [26]. The distribution and abundance of the various truffle species are influenced by the climate, soil and vegetation conditions [27]. Because of the great demand for truffles in the market and the shortage of wild resources, cultivation is a possible strategy for truffle production [26].
Due to their high cultural and gastronomic prestige, various truffle species are appreciated worldwide for their high nutritional value, bioactive compounds and prestigious aroma [28,29,30]. Truffles of the Tuber genus have been the focus of cultivation efforts for many years, particularly in southern and central Europe, where regional endemic species such as Tuber melanosporum, T. aestivum and T. magnatum have a long tradition of culinary use [31,32]. Italy is one of the most important countries in Europe for truffles gathering and trade.
The rapidly growing and wide-ranging economic sector includes the production of mycorrhized plants in nurseries, the harvest of wild and cultivated truffles, truffle dog training, the marketing of fresh and processed truffles, the transformation of truffles into secondary products, myco-tourism (i.e., truffle tourism), mycological gastronomy, interdisciplinary research and producer extension services [8].
Broadleaved forests and plantations in the Mediterranean basin in Italy, France, and Spain represent the most productive environments for the production of the Périgord black truffle, Tuber melanosporum Vittad [8,33,34,35]. Due to the organoleptic qualities of its fruitbodies, T. melanosporum truffles represent one of the most in-demand Tuber species in the world [36] and one of the most relevant in terms of global consumption and economic importance [37,38]. In the second half of the 20th century, intensive orchard farming started (Murat) due to the introduction of protocols to stimulate T. melanosporum ectomycorrhizal production in controlled conditions, among other things. The actual global yield is approximately 120,000 kg per year, generating a yearly revenue of approximately EUR 50 million for truffle farmers [13] with retail prices of ca. EUR 700–1500 per kilogram, depending on seasonal and meteorological variables [33,34,38]. In France, Italy and Spain, productive truffle orchards provide rural landowners with an alternative to agricultural subsidies, encouraging the regeneration of abandoned crop fields because, among other things, this requires little agricultural input [39,40].
The black truffle is cultivated in different countries, mainly in Spain (47 tons/year), France (43 tons/year) and Italy (19 tons/year) [9], as well as in the Southern hemisphere in Australia (11 tons/year) [35], Chile (1.3 tons/year) and Argentina (0.6 tons/year) [41].
Italian truffle hunting and extraction are part of a set of knowledge and practices that has been transmitted orally for centuries. Today, it still characterizes the rural life of entire communities in the Italian peninsula. Truffle hunters usually live in rural areas and small villages. There are two steps to truffle hunting: the hunting and the extraction. The hunting entails the identification of areas where the truffle plant grows, from whose roots grows the underground fungus named ‘truffle’. This step is carried out with the help of a trained dog. The hunters then use a special spade that allows them to extract the truffles without disturbing the soil conditions. Truffle hunting involves a wide range of skills and knowledge (about climate, the environment and vegetation) related to the management of natural ecosystems and to the dog–truffle-hunter relationship. This knowledge is passed on through oral traditions, including stories, fables, anecdotes and expressions that reflect the local cultural identity and create a sense of solidarity within the truffle hunting community. Truffle hunting is often associated with popular feasts that mark the beginning and end of the truffle season. Truffle hunting and extraction in Italy are considered traditional knowledge and practices and part of an Intangible Heritage by the Culture Sector of UNESCO, confirming the great value that the whole world attributes not only to the truffle itself, but to the entire supply chain, rich in history, traditions and culture [42]. Truffle hunting is traditionally practiced with respect for the environment and plant biodiversity, guaranteeing the seasonal regeneration of the truffle. However, the natural production of white truffles in Italy is endangered by several factors including truffle hunting pressure in some Italian regions. The number of truffle hunters is constantly increasing and their official number is now over 70,000 [43].
In 2021, the export of Italian truffles was recorded at +48%, especially to countries like the United States, which have always appreciated them.
Their peculiar sweetness, appreciated by even the most delicate of palates, makes them a very versatile ingredient in the kitchen; they lend themselves not only to classic, elaborate dishes but also to quicker and simpler recipes, such as finger food and appetizers to be offered with aperitifs, or minimal, chic or vegan-friendly recipes, which thanks to the unmistakable flavor of the truffle will have a great impact.
Rich in beneficial nutritional properties, the truffle is recognized as a truly healthy food, and an extremely genuine food; the presence of mineral salts, proteins, magnesium and vitamins also make it an excellent ally for the summer, while the high antioxidant level helps prevent aging.
Thanks to its low calorie content (31 kcal per 100 g) and high water (76%) and fiber (8.4%) content, it is also considered an efficient dietary food. But it is not only the body that benefits from the consumption of truffles: a study has revealed that, thanks to anandamide [44], a neurotransmitter also present in breast milk, all truffles instill in those who taste them a widespread sense of well-being.

2.2. Methodological Approach

In order to carry out this research work, aimed at identifying the factors that determine the propensity to consume truffles and truffle-based products, the TPB was expanded and the PLS-SEM was implemented [2,22,23,24,25,45,46,47].
PLS-SEM has now become the methodology of choice for many researchers studying complex relationships between latent constructs, such as in marketing, consumer choice and other fields. It allows for the evaluation of complex patterns and structural pathways, with many variables considered and used. As highlighted by Lei and Wu [48], PLS-SEM represents an advanced version of general modeling procedures and it is therefore used to evaluate whether the model hypothesized in theory is consistent with the data collected [45,49].
This model represents one of the most widespread methodologies in the analysis of behavioral data, allowing us to study the interrelationships between variables that are not directly measurable (latent variables or factors).
The conceptual framework applied in this study is detailed in Figure 1, which illustrates the research hypotheses and the potential reasons that influence the intentions towards truffle consumption. We considered behavioral intention, defined as the likelihood that a person will engage in a particular behavior [10]. Intention reflects a person’s willingness to engage in a goal behavior. In this study, we hypothesize that the intention is connected, on the one hand, to trust in the seller/restaurateur, and to knowledge of the product and environmental sustainability and, on the other hand, to a combination of motivational variables based on attitude, perceived behavioral control, subjective norms and specific gastronomic curiosities (see Appendix A, Table A1).
There is a positive relationship between attitude towards truffle consumption and both intention and actual consumption. In fact, many studies on consumer behavior in the field of food and drink marketing have shown how the attitude towards a product significantly influences intentions and actual consumption [2,50,51,52]. Attitudes are a person’s positive or negative opinions about events or behaviors, and they reflect a series of preferences, and then generate intentions towards purchasing and consuming at home or away from home (restaurants, pizzerias, etc.). Personal attitude is the main decisive factor in the intention to behave in a certain way and, furthermore, represents the individual’s positive or negative evaluation of that behavior.
The following hypothesis was constructed:
H.1. 
Attitude has a positive and significant impact on consumption intention.
In hypotheses H1, it is believed that attitude plays an important role in the intention to consume truffles due to the high cultural and gastronomic prestige and the particular aroma. Furthermore, the consumer, although attracted by a niche product, pays attention to the perceived behavioral control of the product he consumes.
Perceived behavioral control is explained as an individual’s perception of their ability or self-judgment in terms of engaging in a certain behavior [1]. Several studies have shown that the greater the behavioral control an individual perceives, the stronger their intention to engage in the behavior in question [53,54,55,56]. Shin e Hancer [24] confirmed that, regarding food and drinks, PBC has an influence on intention and actual consumption/purchase. Therefore, the following hypotheses are proposed:
H.2. 
Perceived behavioral control has a positive and significant impact on consumption intention to consume truffles and truffle-based products.
In hypothesis H2, perceived behavioral control is believed to be an important element for intentional consumers of truffles, and therefore attention to health, diet and correct nutrition represent key elements and important predictors of purchase intentions.
There is a positive relationship between curiosity and attitude/intention to consume/purchase truffles and truffle-based products. Numerous studies on consumer behavior in the field of food and drink marketing show that specific curiosity towards a product significantly influences consumption attitudes [52,57]. In this regard, the following research hypotheses were formulated:
H.3. 
Gastronomic curiosity has a positive and significant impact on the intention to consume truffles and truffle-based products.
H.4. 
Gastronomic curiosity has a positive and significant impact on perceived behavioral control.
H.5. 
Gastronomic curiosity has a positive and significant impact on attitude.
In the hypotheses H3, H4 and H5, the specific gastronomic curiosity (SGAC) is believed to positively influence the consumption intentions towards truffles and truffle-based product. Gastronomic curiosity moves the consumer towards new cultural experiences, social relationships and an escape from routine. Furthermore, the consumer, although intrigued by a niche product, pays attention to the perceived behavioral control of the product he consumes.
There is a positive relationship between subjective norms and intention to consume/purchase truffles and truffle-based products. In a context linked to the consumption/purchase of food and drinks, many authors [24] underlined how subjective norms are significant predictors of purchase/consumption intention. Subjective norms are understood as the perceived social pressure to engage in or refrain from a particular behavior, representing an individual’s perception or opinion of what others believe they should do. Subjective norms concern the perception that particular behavior is approved or disapproved of by the people who are important to him/her (loved ones or close ones, family, friends, partners, etc.) [58]. James, Rickard and Rossman [59] defined them as a powerful internal control factor that can easily shape a person’s behavioral intention. Subjective norms are commonly identified as another significant predictor of consumption intention that accentuates the level of importance of another individual’s thoughts [16]. Therefore, in this study on truffles, it is believed that there is a relationship between subjective norms and consumption and/or purchase intention at home and away from home. The following hypotheses were therefore proposed:
H.6. 
Subjective norms have a positive and significant impact on perceived behavioral control.
H.7. 
Subjective norms have a positive and significant impact on consumption intention.
In hypothesis H6, it is believed that consumers’ attention, on the one hand regarding possible scams and on the other regarding the information present in product labels, can positively influence greater caution towards perceived behavioral control, in particular with reference to food safety. In hypothesis H7, the aspects related to the importance of information positively influence the intention to consume truffles and truffle-based products.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Data Collection

The questionnaire was filled out by 145 users residing in Italy and approached in northern regions (the provinces of Lombardia and Piedmont) and in the south–center (the provinces of Lazio, Calabria, Sicily and Campania). Interviews were carried out face to face in the second half of 2022. Respondents were intercepted in particularly crowded places, such as various tourist locations, including some restaurants, hotels and meeting points. Some interviews were conducted during cultural events.
The overall complexity of the structural model has little influence on the sample size requirements for PLS-SEM. Two initial studies [60,61] systematically evaluated the performance of PLS-SEM with small sample sizes, confirming that PLS-SEM performs well.
More recently, a simulation study carried out by Reinartz et al. 2009 [62] indicated PLS Sem as a good choice when the sample size is small.
Researchers can also rely on the rules of thumb provided by Cohen 1992 [63]: regarding statistical power, he analyzed multiple regression models, confirming that that the measurement models had acceptable quality in terms of external saturations, i.e., the saturations should be above the known threshold of 0.70.
The sample size needed for PLS-SEM must be “at least ten times the largest number of structural pathways to a particular latent construct in the model” [45]. As is shown in Figure 1, here we reported seven paths, indicating that the sample size must be greater than 70. Consequently, the sample of 145 valid responses in our survey meets the PLS-SEM minimum size criterion.
The questionnaire required the informed consent of the survey participants, whose anonymity was ensured. Consumers were informed that, according to the Italian privacy law n. 675/96, data collected were processed in an aggregate manner for research purposes only.
Our study used convenience and snowball sampling methods. It used a qualitative research sampling strategy that involves selecting participants based on their accessibility and availability to the researcher.
The choice of this type of sampling is justified by reasons related to the duration and cost of the investigation; moreover, it aimed to limit the risk of obtaining excessive refusals or missed contacts. Before proceeding with data collection, the questionnaire was pre-tested to assess whether some statements were too difficult to understand due to the language, or for lack of clarity in the wording of the questions. These checks allowed us to improve and establish the construct validity of the questionnaire [64,65].
The survey tool is divided into a grid of choice questions: socio-demographic, occupational and family income characteristics; knowledge, habits, places of consumption (restaurant, home, friends’ houses), frequency and prices; any reasons for not purchasing (do not like it, high prices, poor availability, etc.); reasons for consuming truffles (aroma, taste, trust and recommendations of the seller); attention to food safety; curiosity and attitudes; and opinions on truffle groves and sustainability in the territories.
The questions were organized to collect both binary (yes/no) and multiple choice answers (3–4 types of choices), while others were based on a five-point Likert scale (from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).
The current tendency to study increasingly complex relationships makes the application of multivariate analysis methods a useful techniques. Therefore, on the basis of the responses collected, databases were created with the support of the IBM SPSS Statistic v.20 and SmartPLS 4 v. 4.1.0.3 software aimed at detecting the behavior of the consumers [66]. In total, 26 variables were coded, following the order of the questions asked in the questionnaire. The data were processed, analyzed, summarized and interpreted to describe the characteristics of the sample, with the final aim of identifying the main explanatory variables, to highlight the distinctive attributes that most influence consumers’ decision-making processes [67].

3.2. Research Model’s Step

In the analytical procedure, several steps were performed; firstly, an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), based on principal component analysis (PCA), was applied to identify the latent factors, but also for a preliminary interpretation of the solution obtained. The principal components were extracted with the aim of maximizing the proportion of the variance explained. The reliability of the model was assessed using the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test and the Bartlett’s spherical test (see Supplementary Files) [68,69].
PLS-SEM is a non-parametric statistical method. However, it is recommended to check that the data are not too far from normal to avoid risking standard errors during the bootstrapping procedure. The dataset had no missing values and, considering the principles of the descriptive statistics, the model presents valid absolute values of skewness and kurtosis, as well as with regard to the “Cramer-van Mises p-value” equal to 0.000 for all 15 variables considered in the analysis. In particular, the control of the chosen variables allows absolute values of skewness and kurtosis that have to be identified in advance, in order to remove any anomaly values before carrying out the procedure provided by the software. In particular, for skewness and kurtosis, the values must not be greater than +1 or less than −1. In fact, for asymmetry this would mean that the data distribution is unbalanced, while for kurtosis, with a value greater than +1, the distribution is too sharp; if it is less than −1 it is too flattened.
The application of the PLS-SEM procedure allowed us to build the structural model, to examine the final results and the quality criteria of the model [46]. The most important metrics of the model evaluated the reliability, but also the convergent validity and the discriminant validity. The bootstrap procedure was used to estimate the significance of the path parameters and allowed the confidence interval to be reported.
Analysis with the PLS-SEM method is strictly defined and consists of two parts, as described by Hair 2019 [45]. The first step consists of evaluating an external model (reflective and formative measurement models) in which the reliability and validity must be satisfactory. The second step consists of evaluating the internal model to generate loadings and relationships between the structural model (with reference to the latent constructs) and the observed variables [70]. Finally, bootstrapping was carried out to evaluate the statistical significance of the relationships hypothesized in the model. Model estimation provides empirical measures of the relationships between the indicators and the constructs (in the measurement models) and between the constructs themselves (in the structural model). These measures allow us to verify and evaluate the results of the PLS-Sem. In detail:
The most important metrics of the reflective measurement model are
-
(1) internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha and CR composite reliability); (2) convergent validity (reliability of indicators and average variance extracted AVE); and (3) discriminant validity (HTMT Heterotrait–Monotrait ratio and Fornell–Larcker criterion);
-
With regard to the formative measurement model, the indicators to be verified are the following: (1) convergent validity (reliability and validity of the construct); (2) the collinearity between indicators (VIF); and (3) the significance and relevance of external weights;
-
The most important evaluation metrics are the coefficient of determination R2 (explained variance), f2 (effect size), Q2 (predictive relevance) and the size and statistical significance of the model path coefficients (obtained through the procedure PLS predict/CUPAT).

4. Results

4.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics

Table 1 details the socio-demographic information. All interviewees were aged between 20 and 74, with an average age of 42.1 years. Males represented 46.2% of interviewees and females 53.8%. Overall, 34.5% of those interviewed belonged to the millennial generation (respondents were between 26 and 35 years old); the majority of those interviewed had a degree (46.9%) or a post-graduate degree (20.7%), were employed (38.6%) and had a medium–high average annual income (48.3%). They resided in the south–center (74.5%) and north (25.5%) of Italy.
The majority of those interviewed declared that they appreciate truffles (72%); 11% had never tasted them but were curious and interested in consuming them, while 17% of those interviewed declared that they do not like truffles and do not consume them (Table 2).
As for frequency, only 15% consume them more or less regularly, both at home and in restaurants; 57% consume them occasionally, and finally the remaining 27% do not consume them because they do not like the product (17%) or because they have never tasted it (11%). For purchase prices, the majority (85%) did not respond, did not remember or said they do not purchase. In addition, 9% of those interviewed purchased at a price between 50 EUR and 100 EUR/hectogram; only the 5% of respondents declared having paid a price lower than 50 EUR/hectogram; and finally, the remaining 1% declared having paid a price greater than 100 EUR/hectogram.
Overall, 68.6% of consumers interviewed stated that spontaneous truffles are a resource for protecting forests. Only 2.6% did not agree and 28.8% of consumers did not know or did not answer for this aspect.

4.2. Evaluation of PLS-SEM Results of the Structural Model

From a methodological point of view, the development of the EFA made it possible to reduce the complexity of our database into a smaller number of variables. The analysis, performed on fifteen variables, identified five “latent factors” that explained 74.31% of the total variance. An orthogonal rotation was applied with the Varimax method, allowing a simpler reading of the matrix of the extracted components. The adequacy of the sample was verified with the KMO test (the value obtained, equal to 0.824, was considered adequate) and Bartlett’s test of 0.00 (see Supplementary Files). The five components extracted were (1 ATT) “Attitude, preferences and personal experience”; (2 INT) “consumption intentions and motivations”; (3 PBC) “perceived behavioral control”; (4 SGAC) “specific gastronomic curiosity and attitude in the approach to truffle consumption”; and (5 SN) “importance of information on fresh and processed truffles purchased and/or consumed”.
The convergent validity was assessed by the factor loadings of the items and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE). The “Standardized factor loadings” of the 15 items considered should be kept in the measurement model only if their standardized loadings are equal to or greater than 0.6 [71,72]. In fact, as highlighted in Figure 2 and in Table 3, the saturations of the items that make up the measurement model are all valid and between 0.775 and 0.907. The commonly used measure to establish convergent validity is the AVE. It is considered acceptable with values that exceed 0.50, indicating that the variance shared between a construct and its elements exceeds the variance of the measurement error [45]. The results revealed that, for all the constructs, the values of AVE were greater than 0.6 and were between 0.656 and 0.794.
The internal consistency reliability of the model is represented by the Composite Reliability (CR); it varies from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating higher levels of reliability. This composite reliability in the five latent factors exceeds the recommended value of 0.7 (ATT = 0.887; INT = 0.884; PBC = 0.921; SGAC = 0.851; SN = 0.860).
As for Cronbach’s Alpha, it is a conservative measure of reliability, returning relatively lower values than the CR and representing its lower limit. Therefore, it seems appropriate to report on and compare both the parameters. The Cronbach’s Alpha values are valid within the range 0.6 to 0.9. Our values are between 0.738 and 0.871, as can be seen from Table 3.
As regards to the discriminant validity, the Heterotrait–Monotrait (HTMT) criterion and Fornell–Larcker criterion were used [45,73].
In order to confirm the validity of the model, as highlighted by Benitez [74], the HTMT can be evaluated in two ways: (1) by comparing it with a threshold value and (2) by building a confidence interval to examine whether the HTMT is significantly lower than a certain threshold value. For the first approach, simulation studies [75,76] suggest a threshold value of 0.90 if the constructs are conceptually very similar or 0.85 if the constructs are conceptually more distinct. For the second approach, previous methodological research has suggested examining whether HTMT is significantly less than 1 or less than other, smaller values, for example 0.85 or 0.90. The HTMT is a reliable tool for assessing discriminant validity [46,77]. As shown in Table 4, following the second approach, the matrix shows that all the HTMT values are lower than 0.85, thus indicating a good discriminating validity.
The Fornell–Larcker criterion is valid when the square root of the AVE of each construct is greater than its maximum correlation with any other construct in the model. As shown in the results reported in Table 4, the matrix indicates that each construct shares more variance with the items assigned to it (bold values on the diagonal of the table) than with the remaining constructs in the model, thus confirming that the requirements of the Fornell-Larcker criterion are satisfied.
The fit of the model is also ascertained by the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) index, which is defined as the difference between the observed correlation and the model-implied correlation matrix. Thus, it can assess the average magnitude of the discrepancies between observed and expected correlations as an absolute measure of model fit criterion.
According to the literature [74,78], a value lower than 0.10 or equal to 0.08 is considered a good fit. Henseler et al. (2015) [77] introduced the SRMR as a goodness of fit measure for PLS-SEM that can be used to avoid model misspecification. In the present study, SRMR has a value of 0.08 and is therefore considered acceptable. The fit is relatively good between the hypothesized model and the observed data.
Figure 2 shows the Composite Reliability (CR) of the constructs, the saturations of the external model and the total effects of the internal model.
The quality criteria R2, f2 and the collinearity statistics were valid (Table 5 and Table 6). The first R2 concerns the so-called “coefficient of determination”, which is a measure of the share of variance of an endogenous construct that is explained by its predictor constructs (all the constructs connected to it). Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (R2) indicates the degree of explained variance, which is the proportion of the variation in the dependent variable explained by a linear model. Significant, moderate or weak endogenous latent variables have R2 values of 0.75, 0.50 or 0.25, respectively. Based on the R2 value reported in Table 5, in this study, some predictors had weak (ATT = 0.257 and PBC = 0.221) and moderate (INT = 0.498) explanatory power.
The Q2 test is used for a more in-depth investigation of the predictive relevance of the endogenous components [11,45,74]. Q2 greater than zero indicates significant predictive relevance. In the present study, Q2 ATT values = 0.239, INT = 0.037 and PBC = 0.139 were above the threshold value.
Quality criterion f2 is referred to as the “effect size”. The guidelines for evaluating f2 are as follows: values of 0.02 represent weak effects, values of 0.15 represent medium effects and values of 0.35 represent substantial effects [79]. As can be observed in Table 6, f2 is also valid, although it varies between the three types, from weak values (SN → INT = 0.022; SN → PBC = 0.036 and SGAC → INT = 0.057) and average values (ATT → INT = 0.169 and SGAC → PBC = 0.231) up to substantial values for PBC → INT = 0.428 and SGAC → ATT = 0.346.
Furthermore, with reference to the collinearity, all the hypothesized paths are valid since the “VIF threshold values” (Variance Inflation Factor) fall within the limits of the range 0.20–5.0, recording values between 1.0 and 1.466 (Table 6).
Table 7 reports the results of the SEM path. The t-values of the seven paths are all supported by the analysis; the hypothesis H2 (PBC → INT) has the highest t-value (8.383), confirming the importance attributed by consumers to food safety, followed by hypothesis H5 SGAC → ATT (7.531), which confirms how the curiosity for a valuable product greatly attracts consumers, even if it is considered a luxury, whether fresh naturally or proposed as a gourmet product.
In hypothesis H4, SGAC → PBC (6.326) confirms consumers’ interest in food and truffle quality and safety, with additional reference to the curiosity stimulated by new gastronomic experiences.
In hypothesis H1, ATT → INT (4.608) highlights the attitude of the product for its aroma, for the pleasure of tasting it and for sharing it with others (family and/or friends), pushing towards the consumption of fresh and processed truffles.
In hypothesis H3, SGAC → INT (2.859) also confirms how curiosity and gastronomic culture lead to the intention to consume truffles.
Finally, the lowest values of the t-value were recorded for hypotheses H7 and H6, respectively, SN → INT (2.753) and SN → PBC (2.147). This shows that it is necessary to give greater attention to the acquisition of information.
As can be observed in Table 8, the indirect effects represent the mediation effects [80], improving the t-value compared to the direct path (Table 7) only in the following two paths:
-
In the first SGAC → PBC → INT mediation path (i.e., from curiosity to consumption intention, mediated by specific attention to subjective norms), the t-value is improved, being equal to 4.920;
-
In the second mediation path that we verified, SGAC → ATT → INT (i.e., curiosity towards consumption intention mediated by attitude) improved the t-value to equal to 3.606.
Even in these two cases, the importance attributed to “Perceived behavioral control” and to “Attitude” was underlined; these have the effect of mediating and improving the relationship observed between the two latent variables “Specific gastronomic curiosity” and “Consumption intention”, aspects that improve the potential for truffle consumption.

5. Discussion

This study used partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to investigate the factors that determine the desire to consume fresh truffles and truffle products. The work provides information on the demand side of products considered sustainable, contributing to the academic and political debates on green and sustainable production. The results obtained suggested that consumers’ intentions to use fresh and processed truffles derive from a complex decision-making process involving several factors, such as consumers’ personal experiences, marketing communication, food safety, organoleptic aspects, green appearance products and, more generally, environmental protection. This study represents, as far as we know, the first empirical exploration of Italian consumers’ preferences on truffles and truffle products. The findings will improve our understanding of consumer preferences for these valuable niche products. Our results could also offer valuable information to the supply chain operators, in order to develop tailor-made strategies to effectively meet consumer expectations. We can here underline that consumers’ intentions to use fresh and processed truffles derive from a complex decision-making process involving several factors, such as consumers’ personal experiences, marketing communications, food safety, organoleptic aspects, the green reputation of products and, more generally, environmental protection.
The study examined the relationships and effects of ATT, PBC, SGAC and SN on intentions to consume truffles and foods with truffles. All the relationships were identified as positive and significant, and all the mediators were reported to have effective mediating impacts on the pathways of the proposed model.
The results were then discussed considering the existing literature, although the works are not very numerous. Firstly, PBC mainly influenced the consumption intentions: hypothesis H2 (PBC → INT) had, in fact, the highest t-value (8.383). This result is consistent with the studies of Qing et al. (2023) [11], Ellinda Patra et al. (2020) [81], Petrescu et al. (2017) [82] and Azlie et al. (2023) [83], who demonstrated that attention to health plays an important role in the decision-making processes. It indicates that people currently give priority to a healthy lifestyle, with increasing attention paid to health and nutrition.
Furthermore, safety focus positively associated with INT is in line with natural resource studies conducted by Qi and Ploeger (2021) [2], van Riper and Kyle (2014; 2020) [84,85] and Goodson et al., 2024 [86]. In fact, INT highlights people’s consideration towards the consumption of green products supplied by trusted sellers and deriving from their own territory. Particularly, Büntgen et al. (2017) [8] pointed to the use of qualified micotourism guides: the importance of promoting restaurants serving mushrooms, truffles and local products derived from the sustainable management of forest areas, aiming to support the production of non woody products with particular care on the support of other forest ecosystem services, such as the mitigation of climate change effects and the conservation of the biological diversity, has already emerged.
Research hypothesis H5 highlights the second most significant path (SGAC -> ATT with a t-value equal to 7.531). The attractiveness of truffles and truffle-based products is in line with the study by Chen and Wei 2017 [25], which underlines how consumers often try new foods out of curiosity and interest or to remove ambiguity [87]. As Woo Bin Kim and Ho Jung Choo (2023) [88] already indicated, the curiosity refers to behaviors that explore new stimuli which then translate into greater consumer creativity driven by the desire to acquire new knowledge and new information. Curiosity represents a unique combination of aroma, taste, shape and nutrition. The expansion of a new sensorial experience and the nutritional value of truffles and truffle-based products represents an important reason for their consumption.
Furthermore, other studies in the retail field also treat consumer curiosity as a temporary motivational state or desire evoked by novel or inconsistent stimuli [11,89,90].
Hypothesis H4, (SGAC → PBC, t-value equal to 6.326) also confirms that consumers’ interest in food safety, in particular with reference to curiosity, is stimulated by new gastronomic experiences. This means that healthy foods are preferable to less safe foods. Chen and Hua Tsai (2023) [91] used structural equation modeling to explore the behaviors that influence intentions to purchase plant-based meat. In their work, it clearly emerges that exploratory behaviors include risk-taking, a variety of seeking and curiosity, while regulatory-focused values include values focused on promotion and prevention.
Another key result of our work is that hypothesis H1 (ATT → INT, t-value 4.608) had a positive and significant impact on the intention to consume truffles and truffle-based products, thanks to the positive attitude of the whole family and the attractiveness of the truffle aroma, which makes them appetizing. In their article, Chen and Wei 2017 [25] underline the importance of olfactory stimuli capable of activating human cognitive states that can influence individuals’ behaviors and moods [92] for attractiveness or, on the contrary, disgust [93]. The aroma of truffles can represent a powerful incentive in purchasing decisions. Smell differs from other senses, triggering emotions and memories [94] that influence individuals’ moods.
Finally, according to the research model, all the mediation pathways (i.e., curiosity, healthy eating beliefs, attitudes, intention to consume truffles and truffle products) have indirect and specific mediation effects that are both positive and significant with consumption intentions. In addition, through SGAC, PBC, ATT and SN One interpretations of these results it can be seen that consumers demonstrate an intention to consume truffles and truffle-based products in relation to their sustainability values, product attractiveness and status as a valuable niche product, beliefs and pro-environmental standards and linked to the product’s reputation as being rich in nutritional properties and green. All these aspects play an influential role in consumers’ consumption intentions and decisions.

6. Implications

6.1. Theoretical Implications

This study provides an overview of the decision-making process of consumers of truffles and truffle-based products, presenting a theoretical framework that contributes to enriching the current literature on consumption behavior regarding truffles and truffle-based products, which has not been explored in depth so far. In fact, to the best of our knowledge, here we present the first study on the constructs that can help in the prediction of the “consumption intention” of truffles and truffle products.
Our study extended the TPB framework by adding the construct of food-specific gastronomic curiosity (SGAC), linking perceived behavioral control (PBC) to the importance attributed to health and food safety. The factors that influence the propensity to consume fresh and processed truffles were empirically examined by evaluating the PLS-SEM model in the context of the consumption of these products in Italy, one of the main European truffle-producing countries.
We can then assert that this is the first empirical exploration of Italian consumers’ preferences on truffles and truffle products. The proposed approach facilitated our exploration on the factors influencing the consumption of fresh and processed truffles, also providing information on the extent to which attitudes, the recognition of the green and sustainable role of truffles, subjective and objective knowledge and lifestyles influence consumption.
The empirical investigation demonstrated that all components of the applied model had a strong effect on consumers’ consumption of fresh and processed truffles.
This research brings valuable insights into both theoretical and marketing fields. From a theoretical perspective, the study improves the understanding of consumer preferences for these valuable niche products, paving the way for an exploration of the impact of the need for food safety, the emphasis on actual consumption intentions and motivations or potential, the push exerted by curiosity and the highlighting of changes in dietary patterns and the importance that consumers attribute to the sustainability of production systems and the importance of a valuable niche product in purchasing behavior.

6.2. Practical and Managerial Implications

The role that the truffles can have in the correct and sustainable management of forests and mountain ecosystems in the inner areas, in the production of food, in people’s control of the territory, in the recovery of wooded areas and in their economic support has been confirmed [95]. Truffle-related activities represent a promising and continuously growing commercial driver. This is a niche segment in a market increasingly oriented towards expanding the consumption base, which is also thanks to countless truffle-based products, which make their purchase more attractive and accessible. The presence of truffles allows and strengthens the socio-economic development possibilities of the territories involved and slows down the processes of depopulation, which is widespread in mountainous and inner areas. Furthermore, the cultivated truffle represents an opportunity to move towards innovative and specialized agriculture which has been experimented on for decades in Italy and in various European countries. In recent decades, the European market has undergone changes due to the cultivation of truffles, and the appearance of new companies and new operators in a traditional sector linked to natural production and new marketing opportunities have emerged, with an expansion of the range of processed products. Furthermore, promotion and online sales have given greater visibility to the truffle.
This research contributes valuable marketing insights with actionable implications for marketing strategies. For example, the study suggests that both subjective and objective knowledge can be effectively improved through well-designed information campaigns that detail truffle characteristics.
The findings could offer valuable information to supply chain operators to develop tailor-made strategies to effectively meet consumer expectations.
Furthermore, it is becoming evident that since consumers are increasingly interested in the naturalness, nutritional aspects and origin of the product, product labels should incorporate such information to stimulate the consumption of truffles and truffle-based products with particular attention. It is important to indicate on labels the presence of the natural aroma of truffles in products that contain it rather than artificial aromas, which are dangerous and banned by the EU.
This work also has implications for policymakers. The European Commission (EC), with its new policies (EU Green Deal with F2F and biodiversity strategies, Horizon Europe, Next Generation EU), is committed to making European food the global standard of sustainability. The only way to make this product attractive is to raise consumer awareness, highlighting the sustainability attributes and dietary recommendations that they appreciate and that lead to the acceptance of greater spending.

7. Limitations and Directions for Future Research

The present study investigates consumer preferences for truffles and truffle-based products. The study is certainly not without limitations. The first limitation concerns the very nature of the complexity of consumption choices, conditioned by a variety of factors, including the economic, social and cultural conditions of consumers. This is because the consumption of these products is strongly linked to the economic availability of consumers and also to their education, knowledge of the product and the importance they attribute to truffles and truffle-based products and the ability to appreciate them, aspects linked, therefore, to their socio-cultural sphere. Also, these aspects of the socio-cultural sphere could be the object of future insights. Another limitation concerns the fact that the survey deals with a case study of Italian consumers and the results, therefore, pertain to this investigated universe. To make generalizations it is necessary to further extend the studies to other countries and other populations. Furthermore, the demographic and cultural aspects of consumers could also have a different impact on their consumption choices, with obvious repercussions on the results of the study. Future studies should therefore include the effects of additional consumption factors and their consequences. The survey is therefore a first approach aimed at understanding and investigating the consumption of truffles and truffle-based products in Italy. The study, in our opinion, fills a gap and lays the foundation for future research. As far as possible, this implies the need to consider additional geographical realities, given that the survey carried out only considers the Italian territory. In addition to this, future studies would allow further testing of the methodology developed in the study, in light of greater levels of complexity linked to what has been said.

8. Conclusions

This study aims to advance the understanding of attitudes towards the consumption of truffles and truffle products and the underlying mechanisms that influence this propensity. We want to shed light on the decision-making process through which consumers organize and formulate their consumption choices for fresh and processed truffles. The results of this study suggest that intentions to consume fresh and processed truffles derive from a complex decision-making process involving several factors, such as consumers’ personal experiences, marketing communication, food safety, organoleptic aspects, products with a green reputation and, more generally, environmental protection. Trying to clarify how these aspects can influence consumption choices is also of great importance for the choices that must be made by stakeholders. The latter in fact require useful and reliable information for the purposes of formulating suitable product promotion and market development strategies. Furthermore, as emerges from the results obtained, it is a market that still has ample opportunity for expansion both in terms of the quantity of truffles marketed and the range of processed products made. This requires the study, coordination and implementation of strategies, with evident positive effects that do not exclusively concern the food sphere. We are referring to the large scale of the nursery sector, to the marketing of products, to micotourism, to the world of research and dissemination services to producers and also to the selection and training of truffle dogs. It is necessary to improve the labeling of truffle-based products to provide a description of the nutritional content and focus on the natural origin of the aroma attested by reliable certifications to gain consumer trust. The results of this study will be useful to stakeholders to better understand the impact of our insights on consumer purchasing intentions and habits.
Some limitations of the current study point to future research directions. Firstly, the number of interviewees should be increased and the research extended to other Italian or European areas to improve our understanding of the consumption behavior of fresh and processed truffles. Secondly, the study addressed only some factors related to attitudes, behaviors, motivations and subjective norms and may have overlooked further crucial elements (such as the influence of social media, ethical aspects, perception of quality and allowing an enrichment of the results).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su16125002/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.R.L. and A.N.; methodology, V.R.L.; software, V.R.L.; validation, A.N. and V.R.L.; formal analysis, all the authors; investigation, V.R.L.; data curation, A.N. and V.R.L.; writing—original draft preparation, V.R.L. and A.N.; writing—review and editing, all the authors; supervision, A.N. and F.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the nature of this research. All participants were fully informed that anonymity is assured. All the participants agreed to answer the questions, taking into account that the data obtained would be used strictly for statistics.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. All participants were fully informed of the anonymity of the collected data.

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted within the “TARTUFOREST” research project of the PSR 2014/2020 Calabria Region (Measure 16.1.1) and within the Doctoral research project (XXXVII cycle) of Valentina Rosa Laganà entitled “The truffle chain in Calabria: production and marketing aspects” (PON “Research and Innovation” 2014–2020—“Action IV.5 Additional PhD scholarships on Green topics”).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Construct, survey question and reference bibliography.
Table A1. Construct, survey question and reference bibliography.
ConstructSurvey QuestionsDefinitionReferences
ATT1. For me and my family it is pleasant to consume truffles and truffle-based products
2. If I want to I can consume truffles
3. Truffle’s aroma makes me very keen to consume it
Attitudes are a person’s positive or negative opinions. Events and behaviors reflect a series of preferences and generate positive or negative intentions towards purchasing and consuming at home or away from home[96,97,98,99]
INT1. I intend to consume truffles and truffle-based product thanks to the advice of a seller
2. I have an intention to consume truffles because I consider them a sustainable product
3. I prefer to consume truffles from my area
Purchasing intent allows people to make informed decisions with the aim of consuming/purchasing both immediately and in the near future[21,23,72,100,101]
PBC1. I consider myself attentive to the quality of the truffles I consume
2. I believe I can recognize truffles and truffle products as healthy and safe food.
3. For me, consuming healthy, low-calorie foods like truffles is a good habit
Personal beliefs and the importance attributed to safety give rise to consumer behavioral control[21,81,82,83,102,103]
SGAC1. I am curious about the gastronomic culture that revolves around truffles
2. I like trying new foods and new gastronomic experiences
3. For me it is important to escape from routine
Curiosity and gastronomic culture regarding a new food can trigger choice mechanisms that influence the overall eating experience[103,104]
SN1. Paying attention to the information on the label when purchasing truffles is a habit acquired in the family
2. Reading the expiry date is a habit for me
3. When I buy truffles or truffle-based products I pay attention to possible “scams”
Subjective norms relate to beliefs about one’s own and others’ attitudes with respect to the actions that each person carries out [12,57,66,105]

References

  1. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H. Three Years into the Pandemic: Insights of the COVID-19 Impacts on Food Security and Nutrition in Low and Middle-Income Countries. Heliyon 2024, 10, e28946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Qi, X.; Ploeger, A. Explaining Chinese Consumers’ Green Food Purchase Intentions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour. Foods 2021, 10, 1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dal Moro, L.; Mazutti, J.; Brandli, L.L.; Casagranda, Y.G.; Mores, G.d.V. Overcoming the Challenges of Sustainable Family Agriculture in Southern Brazil: Contributions to the 2030 Agenda. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Scheuer, S.; Davies, C.; Roitsch, D. Governance, Institutional and Economic Frameworks for Urban Forests as a Nature-Based Solution in Europe. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 354, 120384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dunlop, T.; Khojasteh, D.; Cohen-Shacham, E.; Glamore, W.; Haghani, M.; van den Bosch, M.; Rizzi, D.; Greve, P.; Felder, S. The Evolution and Future of Research on Nature-Based Solutions to Address Societal Challenges. Commun. Earth Environ. 2024, 5, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huber, P.; Kurttila, M.; Hujala, T.; Wolfslehner, B.; Sanchez-Gonzalez, M.; Pasalodos-Tato, M.; de-Miguel, S.; Bonet, J.A.; Marques, M.; Borges, J.G.; et al. Expert-Based Assessment of the Potential of Non-Wood Forest Products to Diversify Forest Bioeconomy in Six European Regions. Forests 2023, 14, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ferraro, V.; Venturella, G.; Pecoraro, L.; Gao, W.; Gargano, M.L. Cultivated Mushrooms: Importance of a Multipurpose Crop, with Special Focus on Italian Fungiculture. Plant Biosyst. 2022, 156, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Büntgen, U.; Latorre, J.; Egli, S.; Martínez-Peña, F. Socio-Economic, Scientific, and Political Benefits of Mycotourism. Ecosphere 2017, 8, e01870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oliach, D.; Vidale, E.; Brenko, A.; Marois, O.; Andrighetto, N.; Stara, K.; Martínez de Aragón, J.; Colinas, C.; Bonet, J.A. Truffle Market Evolution: An Application of the Delphi Method. Forests 2021, 12, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, Q.; Mamun, A.A.; Naznen, F.; Siyu, L.; Makhbul, Z.K.M. Modelling the Significance of Health Values, Beliefs and Norms on the Intention to Consume and the Consumption of Organic Foods. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mulazzani, L.; Arru, B.; Camanzi, L.; Furesi, R.; Malorgio, G.; Pulina, P.; Madau, F.A. Factors Influencing Consumption Intention of Insect-Fed Fish among Italian Respondents. Foods 2023, 12, 3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Oliach, D.; Colinas, C.; Castaño, C.; Fischer, C.R.; Bolaño, F.; Bonet, J.A.; Oliva, J. The Influence of Forest Surroundings on the Soil Fungal Community of Black Truffle (Tuber melanosporum) Plantations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 470–471, 118212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moreau, V.; Sahakian, M.; van Griethuysen, P.; Vuille, F. Coming Full Circle: Why Social and Institutional Dimensions Matter for the Circular Economy. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Privitera, D.; Nicolosi, A. Comunità, Luoghi e Condivisione. Esplorazione di Modelli Alternativi di Consumo; Franco Angeli: Milano, Italy, 2017; ISBN 978-88-917-5068-6. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317620371_Comunita_Luoghi_e_Condivisione_Esplorazione_di_modelli_alternativi_di_consumo (accessed on 15 July 2022).
  16. Mylan, J. Understanding the Diffusion of Sustainable Product-Service Systems: Insights from the Sociology of Consumption and Practice Theory. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 97, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Warde, A. After Taste: Culture, Consumption and Theories of Practice. J. Consum. Cult. 2014, 14, 279–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tukker, A. Product Services for a Resource-Efficient and Circular Economy—A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 97, 76–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ajzen, I. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior; Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J., Eds.; SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1985; pp. 11–39. ISBN 978-3-642-69746-3. [Google Scholar]
  20. McEachan, R.; Taylor, N.; Harrison, R.; Lawton, R.; Gardner, P.; Conner, M. Meta-Analysis of the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA) to Understanding Health Behaviors. Ann. Behav. Med. 2016, 50, 592–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Parashar, S.; Singh, S.; Sood, G. Examining the Role of Health Consciousness, Environmental Awareness and Intention on Purchase of Organic Food: A Moderated Model of Attitude. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 386, 135553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nekmahmud, M.; Naz, F.; Ramkissoon, H.; Fekete-Farkas, M. Transforming Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Green Products: Role of Social Media. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 185, 122067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sabina del Castillo, E.J.; Díaz Armas, R.J.; Gutiérrez Taño, D. An Extended Model of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Predict Local Wine Consumption Intention and Behaviour. Foods 2021, 10, 2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shin, Y.H.; Hancer, M. The Role of Attitude, Subjective Norm, Perceived Behavioral Control, and Moral Norm in the Intention to Purchase Local Food Products. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2016, 19, 338–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, N.-H.; Wei, S. Factors Influencing Consumers’ Attitudes towards the Consumption of Edible Flowers. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 56, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferrara, G.; Lombardini, L.; Mazzeo, A.; Bruno, G.L. Evaluation of Pecan [Carya Illinoinensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch] Cultivars for Possible Cultivation for Both Fruit and Truffle Production in the Puglia Region, Southeastern Italy. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Henkrar, F.; Meyad, C.; Oikrim, M.; Bouhaddou, N.; Khabar, L. Updating Ecology and Distribution of Wild Truffles in Morocco. Forests 2023, 14, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Patel, S.; Rauf, A.; Khan, H.; Khalid, S.; Mubarak, M.S. Potential Health Benefits of Natural Products Derived from Truffles: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 70, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yan, X.; Wang, Y.; Sang, X.; Fan, L. Nutritional Value, Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Three Tuber Species from China. AMB Expr. 2017, 7, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Park, H.; Gwon, J.-H.; Lee, J.-C.; Kim, H.S.; Oh, D.S.; Eom, A.-H. Report on Tuber Huidongense, a Truffle Species Previously Unrecorded in Korea. Korean J. Mycol. 2020, 48, 505–510. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hall, I.R.; Haslam, W. Truffle Cultivation in the Southern Hemisphere. In Edible Ectomycorrhizal Mushrooms: Current Knowledge and Future Prospects; Zambonelli, A., Bonito, G.M., Eds.; Soil Biology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 191–208. ISBN 978-3-642-33823-6. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zambonelli, A.; Iotti, M.; Puliga, F.; Hall, I.R. Enhancing White Truffle (Tuber Magnatum Picco and T. Borchii Vittad.) Cultivation through Biotechnology Innovation. In Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Vegetable Crops: Volume 10: Leaves, Flowerheads, Green Pods, Mushrooms and Truffles; Al-Khayri, J.M., Jain, S.M., Johnson, D.V., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 505–532. ISBN 978-3-030-66969-0. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bonet, J.A.; Fischer, C.R.; Colinas, C. Cultivation of black truffle to promote reforestation and land-use stability. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2006, 26, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Reyna, S.; Garcia-Barreda, S. Black Truffle Cultivation: A Global Reality. For. Syst. 2014, 23, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Čejka, T.; Isaac, E.L.; Oliach, D.; Martínez-Peña, F.; Egli, S.; Thomas, P.; Trnka, M.; Büntgen, U. Risk and Reward of the Global Truffle Sector under Predicted Climate Change. Environ. Res. Lett. 2022, 17, 024001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Belfiori, B.; Riccioni, C.; Tempesta, S.; Pasqualetti, M.; Paolocci, F.; Rubini, A. Comparison of Ectomycorrhizal Communities in Natural and Cultivated Tuber Melanosporum Truffle Grounds. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 81, 547–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lefevre, C.; Hall, I. The status of truffle cultivation: A global perspective. Acta Hortic. 2001, 556, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guevara-Guerrero, G.; Pacioni, G.; Leonardi, M.; Ocañas, F.G.; Hernández, R.G. Mycorrhizal Synthesis of Périgord Black Truffle (Tuber Melanosporum) with Mexican Oak Species. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2022, 50, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Samils, N.; Olivera, A.; Danell, E.; Alexander, S.J.; Fischer, C.; Colinas, C. The Socioeconomic Impact of Truffle Cultivation in Rural Spain1. Econ. Bot. 2008, 62, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pagliarani, S.; Vannini, A.; Kuzminsky, E.; Morales-Rodríguez, C. Novel Soil-Less Potting Mixes for the Mycorrhization of Quercus Pubescens Willd. Seedlings with Tuber Melanosporum Vittad. BMC Plant Biol 2023, 23, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Calvo, R.; Prestifilippo, M.; Venturella, G. Truffle Gathering and Trade in the Monti Sicani Regional Park (Sicily, Italy), a New Perspective for the Local Economy and for Employment in Economically Depressed Areas. Plant Biosyst. 2022, 156, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. UNESCO-Truffle Hunting and Extraction in Italy, Traditional Knowledge and Practice. Available online: https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/truffle-hunting-and-extraction-in-italy-traditional-knowledge-and-practice-01395 (accessed on 21 February 2024).
  43. Tavolo Tecnico Settore Tartufo. Available online: https://www.politicheagricole.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/11100 (accessed on 27 February 2024).
  44. Pacioni, G.; Rapino, C.; Zarivi, O.; Falconi, A.; Leonardi, M.; Battista, N.; Colafarina, S.; Sergi, M.; Bonfigli, A.; Miranda, M.; et al. Truffles Contain Endocannabinoid Metabolic Enzymes and Anandamide. Phytochemistry 2015, 110, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. EBR 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ringle, C.M.; Becker, J.-M.; Cheah, J.-H.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEMs Most Wanted Guidance. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2023, 35, 321–346. [Google Scholar]
  47. Martínez Ávila, M.; Fierro Moreno, E. Aplicación de La Técnica PLS-SEM En La Gestión Del Conocimiento: Un Enfoque Técnico Práctico / Application of the PLS-SEM Technique in Knowledge Management: A Practical Technical Approach. RIDE 2018, 8, 130–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lei, P.-W.; Wu, Q. Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Practical Considerations. Educ. Meas. Issues Pract. 2007, 26, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hayes, A.F.; Montoya, A.K.; Rockwood, N.J. The Analysis of Mechanisms and Their Contingencies: PROCESS versus Structural Equation Modeling. Australas. Mark. J. 2017, 25, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tomić Maksan, M.; Kovačić, D.; Cerjak, M. The Influence of Consumer Ethnocentrism on Purchase of Domestic Wine: Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour. Appetite 2019, 142, 104393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bianchi, C.; Mortimer, G. Drivers of Local Food Consumption: A Comparative Study. Br. Food J. 2015, 117, 2282–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Melovic, B.; Cirovic, D.; Dudic, B.; Vulic, T.B.; Gregus, M. The Analysis of Marketing Factors Influencing Consumers’ Preferences and Acceptance of Organic Food Products—Recommendations for the Optimization of the Offer in a Developing Market. Foods 2020, 9, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Botetzagias, I.; Dima, A.-F.; Malesios, C. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Context of Recycling: The Role of Moral Norms and of Demographic Predictors. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 95, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. de Leeuw, A.; Valois, P.; Ajzen, I.; Schmidt, P. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Identify Key Beliefs Underlying Pro-Environmental Behavior in High-School Students: Implications for Educational Interventions. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015, 42, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lizin, S.; Van Dael, M.; Van Passel, S. Battery Pack Recycling: Behaviour Change Interventions Derived from an Integrative Theory of Planned Behaviour Study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 122, 66–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, E.S.-T. Hypotheses for the Reasons behind Beer Consumer’s Willingness to Purchase Beer: An Expanded Theory from a Planned Behavior Perspective. Foods 2020, 9, 1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nguyen, N.-T.; Pham, T.-N. Consumer Attitudinal Dispositions: A Missing Link between Socio-Cultural Phenomenon and Purchase Intention of Foreign Products: An Empirical Research on Young Vietnamese Consumers. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2021, 8, 1884345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Finlay, K.A.; Trafimow, D.; Moroi, E. The Importance of Subjective Norms on Intentions to Perform Health Behaviors. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1999, 29, 2381–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. James, J.S.; Rickard, B.J.; Rossman, W.J. Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation in Applesauce: Using a Choice Experiment to Assess the Value of Organic, Local, and Nutrition Attributes. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 2009, 38, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chin, W.W.; Newsted, P.R. Structural Equation Modeling Analysis with Small Samples Using Partial Least Squares; Sage Publication: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  61. Dijkstra, T.K.; Henseler, J. Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. MIS Q. 2015, 39, 297–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Reinartz, W.; Haenlein, M.; Henseler, J. An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2009, 26, 332–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cohen, J. A Power Primer. Psychol. Bull. 1992, 112, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Colton, D. Designing and Constructing Instruments for Social Research and Evaluation; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-0-7879-8784-8. [Google Scholar]
  65. Shadish, W.R.; Cook, T.D.; Campbell, D.T. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference; Houghton, Mifflin and Company: Boston, MA, USA, 2002; pp. xxi, 623. ISBN 978-0-395-61556-0. [Google Scholar]
  66. Nicolosi, A.; Laganà, V.R.; Di Gregorio, D. Habits, Health and Environment in the Purchase of Bakery Products: Consumption Preferences and Sustainable Inclinations before and during COVID-19. Foods 2023, 12, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Di Gregorio, D.; Guida, A.; Laganà, V.R.; Cannavò, S.; Nicolosi, A. Agri-food and typical products events: Promotional tools for a territory in southern italy. Pirineos 2022, 177, e069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kim, M.K.; Kwak, H.S. Influence of Functional Information on Consumer Liking and Consumer Perception Related to Health Claims for Blueberry Functional Beverages. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lukinac, J.; Jukić, M. Barley in the Production of Cereal-Based Products. Plants 2022, 11, 3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ha, M.-T. Greenwash and Green Brand Equity: The Mediating Role of Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust, and the Moderating Role of Green Concern. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0277421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chin, W.W. How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares; Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 655–690. ISBN 978-3-540-32825-4. [Google Scholar]
  72. Dash, G.; Paul, J. CB-SEM vs. PLS-SEM Methods for Research in Social Sciences and Technology Forecasting. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 173, 121092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mustapa, M.A.C.; Amin, L.; Frewer, L.J. Predictors of Stakeholders’ Intention to Adopt Nutrigenomics. Genes Nutr. 2020, 15, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Benitez, J.; Henseler, J.; Castillo, A.; Schuberth, F. How to Perform and Report an Impactful Analysis Using Partial Least Squares: Guidelines for Confirmatory and Explanatory IS Research. Inf. Manag. 2020, 57, 103168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Franke, G.; Sarstedt, M. Heuristics versus Statistics in Discriminant Validity Testing: A Comparison of Four Procedures. INTR 2019, 29, 430–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Roemer, E.; Schuberth, F.; Henseler, J. HTMT2—An Improved Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Structural Equation Modeling. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2021, 121, 2637–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hu, L.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1988; ISBN 978-0-203-77158-7. [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhao, X.; Lynch, J.G., Jr.; Chen, Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. J. Consum. Res. 2010, 37, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ellinda-Patra, M.W.; Dewanti-Hariyadi, R.; Nurtama, B. Modeling of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior Characteristics. Food Res. 2020, 4, 1045–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Petrescu, A.; Oncioiu, I.; Petrescu, M. Perception of Organic Food Consumption in Romania. Foods 2017, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Azlie, W.E.; Zahari, M.S.M.; Majid, H.N.A.; Hanafiah, M.H. To What Extent Does Consumers’ Perceived Health Consciousness Regarding Organic Food Influence Their Dining Choices at Organic Restaurants? An Empirical Investigation. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2023, 34, 100843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Van Riper, C.J.; Kyle, G.T. Capturing Multiple Values of Ecosystem Services Shaped by Environmental Worldviews: A Spatial Analysis. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 145, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. van Riper, C.J.; Lum, C.; Kyle, G.T.; Wallen, K.E.; Absher, J.; Landon, A.C. Values, Motivations, and Intentions to Engage in Proenvironmental Behavior. Environ. Behav. 2020, 52, 437–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Goodson, D.J.; van Riper, C.J.; Andrade, R.; Stewart, W.; Cebrián-Piqueras, M.A.; Raymond, C.M. Broad Values as the Basis for Understanding Deliberation about Protected Area Management. Sustain. Sci. 2024, 19, 449–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Litman, J.A.; Collins, R.P.; Spielberger, C.D. The Nature and Measurement of Sensory Curiosity. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2005, 39, 1123–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bin Kim, W.; Jung Choo, H. How Virtual Reality Shopping Experience Enhances Consumer Creativity: The Mediating Role of Perceptual Curiosity. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 154, 113378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Beck, M.; Crié, D. I Virtually Try It … I Want It! Virtual Fitting Room: A Tool to Increase on-Line and off-Line Exploratory Behavior, Patronage and Purchase Intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 40, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hill, K.M.; Fombelle, P.W.; Sirianni, N.J. Shopping under the Influence of Curiosity: How Retailers Use Mystery to Drive Purchase Motivation. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 1028–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chen, N.; Tsai, M. Consumers’ Intention to Adopt Plant-based Meat. Agribusiness 2023, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Berridge, K.C.; Ho, C.-Y.; Richard, J.M.; DiFeliceantonio, A.G. The Tempted Brain Eats: Pleasure and Desire Circuits in Obesity and Eating Disorders. Brain Res. 2010, 1350, 43–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bone, P.F.; Ellen, P.S. Scents in the Marketplace: Explaining a Fraction of Olfaction. J. Retail. 1999, 75, 243–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Arshamian, A.; Iannilli, E.; Gerber, J.C.; Willander, J.; Persson, J.; Seo, H.-S.; Hummel, T.; Larsson, M. The Functional Neuroanatomy of Odor Evoked Autobiographical Memories Cued by Odors and Words. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Carrosio, G.; Lucatelli, S.; Barca, F. Le Aree Interne da Luogo di Disuguaglianza a Opportunità per il Paese; Marsilio: Venice, Italy, 2018; ISBN 978-88-317-9734-4. [Google Scholar]
  96. De Cianni, R.; Pippinato, L.; Mancuso, T. A Systematic Review on Drivers Influencing Consumption of Edible Mushrooms and Innovative Mushroom-Containing Products. Appetite 2023, 182, 106454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Di Cori, V.; Franceschinis, C.; Robert, N.; Pettenella, D.M.; Thiene, M. Moral Foundations and Willingness to Pay for Non-Wood Forest Products: A Study in Three European Countries. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Luong, T.-B.; Ho, C.-H. The Influence of Food Vloggers on Social Media Users: A Study from Vietnam. Heliyon 2023, 9, e18259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Bruner, G. Marketing Scales Handbook: Multi-Item Measures for Consumer Insight Research; GCBII Productions, LLC: Fort Worth, TX, USA, 2015; Volume 8, ISBN 978-0-692-39583-7. [Google Scholar]
  100. Cao, C.; Zhang, X. What Triggers Consumers to Purchase Eco-Friendly Food? The Impact of Micro Signals, Macro Signals and Perceived Value. Br. Food J. 2024, 126, 2204–2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. You, J.-J.; Jong, D.; Wiangin, U. Consumers’ Purchase Intention of Organic Food via Social Media: The Perspectives of Task-Technology Fit and Post-Acceptance Model. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 579274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ajzen, I. Consumer Attitudes and Behavior: The Theory of Planned Behavior Applied to Food Consumption Decisions. Ital. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2015, 70, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Rombach, M.; Dean, D.L.; Bitsch, V. “Got Milk Alternatives?” Understanding Key Factors Determining U.S. Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Plant-Based Milk Alternatives. Foods 2023, 12, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Hsu, F.C.; Agyeiwaah, E.; Scott, N. Understanding Tourists’ Perceived Food Consumption Values: Do Different Cultures Share Similar Food Values? Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2022, 28, 100533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kopaei, H.R.; Nooripoor, M.; Karami, A.; Petrescu-Mag, R.M.; Petrescu, D.C. Drivers of Residents’ Home Composting Intention: Integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior, the Norm Activation Model, and the Moderating Role of Composting Knowledge. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual model hypothesized in the analysis and the related research hypothesis.
Figure 1. Conceptual model hypothesized in the analysis and the related research hypothesis.
Sustainability 16 05002 g001
Figure 2. Results of PLS-SEM. Own development and adaptation. External model: external saturations; internal model: total effects; constructs: CR composite reliability. ATT = Attitude; INT = Intention for truffle consumption; PBC = Perceived Behavioral control; SGAC = Specific Gastronomic Curiosity; SN = Subjective.
Figure 2. Results of PLS-SEM. Own development and adaptation. External model: external saturations; internal model: total effects; constructs: CR composite reliability. ATT = Attitude; INT = Intention for truffle consumption; PBC = Perceived Behavioral control; SGAC = Specific Gastronomic Curiosity; SN = Subjective.
Sustainability 16 05002 g002
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the sample.
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the sample.
% %
GenderMale46.2Food purchasing responsibilityInterviewed69.6
Female53.8Other 30.4
Age generationsGeneration Z20.0Education levelMiddle school8.3
Millennials34.5High school24.1
X Generation30.3Degree46.9
Baby boomers15.2Post-grad degree20.7
Annual incomeNot answer4.1Occupation Employed38.6
≤15,0005.5Self-employed22.8
15,001–30,00040.0Retired4.8
30,001–48,00048.3Student20.7
≥48,0012.1Other 13.1
Table 2. Consumption, frequency and purchase prices declared by the consumers interviewed.
Table 2. Consumption, frequency and purchase prices declared by the consumers interviewed.
Consumption of truffles and truffle-based productsAppreciate them65.5%
Do not like15.2%
He/she has never tasted them, but is curious/interested19.3%
Consumption frequenciesRegularly, at home or in a restaurant15.0%
Occasionally, at home or at a restaurant57.0%
He/she does not consume them because they do not like them17.0%
He/she has never tasted them11.0%
Purchase prices<EUR 50.0/100 g5.0%
EUR 50.0 and EUR 100.0/100 g9.0%
Greater than EUR 100.0/100 g1.0%
He/she does not know, does not remember or did not answer85.0%
Truffles’ green role: spontaneous truffles are a resource for protecting forestsYes, it is true68.6%
No, it is not true2.6%
I do not know28.8%
Table 3. Standardized loading of individual items, CR, AVE and Cronbach’s Alpha.
Table 3. Standardized loading of individual items, CR, AVE and Cronbach’s Alpha.
Factors and ItemsStandardization of Individual ItemsCronbach’s
Alpha
Composite Reliability (rho_a)Composite Reliability (CR)Average Variance Extracted (AVE)
ATT 0.8090.8140.8870.724
att_1For me and my family it is pleasant to consume truffles and truffle-based products0.798
att_2If I want to I can consume truffles and truffle-based products0.870
att_3Truffle aroma makes me very keen to consume them0.882
INT 0.8050.8140.8840.718
int_1I intend to consume truffles and truffle-based product thanks to the advice of a seller0.848
int_2I intend to consume truffles because I consider them a sustainable product0.847
int_3I prefer to consume truffles from my area0.847
PBC 0.8710.9010.9200.794
pbc_1I consider myself attentive to the quality of the truffles I consume0.905
pbc_2I believe I can recognize truffles and truffle products as a healthy and safe food.0.862
pbc_3For me, consuming healthy, low-calorie foods like truffles is a good habit0.907
SGAC 0.7380.7470.8510.656
sgac_1I am curious about the gastronomic culture that revolves around truffles0.863
sgac_2I like trying new foods and new gastronomic experiences0.790
sgac_3For me, consuming truffles is important to escape from a routine0.775
SN 0.7560.7560.8600.673
sn_1Paying attention to the information on the label when purchasing truffles is a habit acquired in the family0.856
sn_2Reading the expiry date is a habit for me0.795
sn_3When I buy truffles or truffle-based products I pay attention to possible “scams”0.808
Note: ATT = Attitude; INT = Intention for truffle consumption; PBC = Perceived Behavioral control; SGAC = Specific Gastronomic Curiosity; SN = Subjective norms. Source: own elaboration from the analysis of data from Smart PLS4.
Table 4. HTMT and Fornell–Larcker criterion (discriminating validity).
Table 4. HTMT and Fornell–Larcker criterion (discriminating validity).
HTMT
ATTINTPBCSGACSN
ATT
INT0.597
PBC0.5100.738
SGAC0.6520.2890.548
SN0.0770.2660.2450.153
Fornell–Larcker Criterion
ATTINTPBCSGACSN
ATT0.851
INT0.4930.847
PBC0.4390.6350.892
SGAC0.5070.2240.4390.810
SN0.0310.2120.2030.0820.820
Note: ATT = Attitude; INT = Intention for truffle consumption; PBC = Perceived Behavioral control; SGAC = Specific Gastronomic Curiosity; SN = Subjective norms.
Table 5. R2 and Q2.
Table 5. R2 and Q2.
R2Q2 Predict *
ATT0.2570.239
INT0.4980.037
PBC0.2210.139
* Q2 result of the PLS predicting CVPAT procedure (PLS_SEM ver. 4.1). ATT = Attitude; INT = Intention for truffle consumption; PBC = Perceived Behavioral control.
Table 6. f2 and VIF collinearity statistics.
Table 6. f2 and VIF collinearity statistics.
f2VIF
ATT → INT0.1691.466
PBC → INT0.4281.399
SGAC → ATT0.3461.000
SGAC → INT0.0571.461
SGAC → PBC0.2311.007
SN → INT0.0221.048
SN → PBC0.0361.007
Note: ATT = Attitude; INT = Intention for truffle consumption; PBC = Perceived Behavioral control; SGAC = Specific Gastronomic Curiosity; SN = Subjective norms.
Table 7. Bootstrap procedure—total effects.
Table 7. Bootstrap procedure—total effects.
Path CoefficientsHypothesisOriginal Sample (O)Confidence Interval
Bootstrap 97.5%
t-Valuesp-ValuesResults
LowerHigher
ATT → INTH10.3530.2050.5004.6080.000 *** Supported
PBC → INTH20.5480.4140.6728.3830.000 *** Supported
SGAC → ATTH50.5070.3650.6337.5310.000 *** Supported
SGAC → INTH30.2080.0710.3522.8590.004 *** Supported
SGAC → PBCH40.4250.2930.5576.3260.000 *** Supported
SN → INTH70.1990.0560.3392.7530.006 ** Supported
SN → SAFH60.1680.0200.3252.1470.032 * Supported
* p-Value < 0.05; ** p-Value < 0.01; *** p-Value < 0.001 Source: Authors elaboration from data analysis in Smart-PLS4. Note: ATT = Attitude; INT = Intention for truffle consumption; PBC = Perceived Behavioral control; SGAC = Specific Gastronomic Curiosity; SN = Subjective norms.
Table 8. Specific indirect effects and mediation process.
Table 8. Specific indirect effects and mediation process.
Original Sample (O)Confidence Interval
Bootstrap 97.5%
t-Valuesp-ValuesPath
Hypothesis
Results
LowerHigher
SGAC → PBC → INT0.2330.1510.3364.9200.000 ***H4 → H2Supported
SGAC → ATT → INT0.1790.0960.2833.7470.000 ***H5 → H1Supported
SN → PBC → INT0.0920.0100.1892.0050.045 *H6 → H2Supported
* p-Value < 0.05; *** p-Value < 0.001 Source: authors’ elaboration. Note: ATT = Attitude; INT = Intention for truffle consumption; PBC = Perceived Behavioral control; SGAC = Specific Gastronomic Curiosity; SN = Subjective norms.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Laganà, V.R.; Lombardi, F.; Di Gregorio, D.; Nicolosi, A. Consumption Preferences for Truffles and Truffle-Based Products: An Application of the PLS-SEM Model. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5002. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125002

AMA Style

Laganà VR, Lombardi F, Di Gregorio D, Nicolosi A. Consumption Preferences for Truffles and Truffle-Based Products: An Application of the PLS-SEM Model. Sustainability. 2024; 16(12):5002. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Laganà, Valentina Rosa, Fabio Lombardi, Donatella Di Gregorio, and Agata Nicolosi. 2024. "Consumption Preferences for Truffles and Truffle-Based Products: An Application of the PLS-SEM Model" Sustainability 16, no. 12: 5002. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop