Agroindustrial Complex to Promote the Economic and Social Development of Agricultural Producers of the Callejon de Huaylas, Ancash, Peru 2023
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe introduction is too general and it should describe the recent research relevant to the topic of the article.
The methodology should be described in a text. It was written in a table in Spanish.
Some texts about climate are not necessary as well as other descriptions of the history of agriculture (especially BC) and about types of fruits and vegetables. Instead of these paragraphs, the recent research should be elaborated and discussed. A research gap should be found.
At the same time, Discussion is missing as well as pro-and-cons argumentation. The conclusion is too general and modest.
There are a lot of texts on Spanish - Figure 2 , Figure 3 (text in Figure), Figure 4 (legend), Table 2 is not in English, the text of 3.2.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageThere are texts in Spanish. English should be improved.
Author Response
The introduction is too general and it should describe the recent research relevant to the topic of the article.
In lines 131–136, the impact of accessing foreign markets on farmers wishing to export is mentioned. By adopting new agricultural practices, it positively affects the biological diversity, which represents not only sustainability but also the economic growth of a country.
The methodology should be described in a text. It was written in a table in Spanish.
The methodology outline was updated in English. Additionally, it is described in the paragraph between lines 387–393.
Some texts about climate are not necessary as well as other descriptions of the history of agriculture (especially BC) and about types of fruits and vegetables. Instead of these paragraphs, the recent research should be elaborated and discussed. A research gap should be found.
Observation addressed. The paragraph in lines 53-60 was removed.
At the same time, Discussion is missing as well as pro-and-cons argumentation. The conclusion is too general and modest.
Observation addressed.
There are a lot of texts on Spanish - Figure 2 , Figure 3 (text in Figure), Figure 4 (legend), Table 2 is not in English, the text of 3.2.
Observation addressed.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authors1. The content of the article does not fully correspond to its title. The economic and social development of the region should be assessed by some indicators and criteria. It is not clear exactly what indicators the authors evaluate their proposals. The author's proposed design of the building, the location of the plots, the zoning scheme of the project (Figure 17), the elements of clean energy (Figure 23) do not represent elements of an agro-industrial complex to promote the economic and social development of the region.
2. The scheme of the study is not presented in English (Figure 11) and it is difficult to read it.
3. The authors provide statistical material (Figure 6), but for some reason they do not analyze it themselves, but refer to scientific literature.
4. Figure 17, Figure 20, Figure 21, Figure 22 represent the authors' proposals for the project. However, these proposals are not scientifically substantiated. They are technical schemes, but without technical scientific justification.
I think that the articles should be substantially improved.
Author Response
- The content of the article does not fully correspond to its title. The economic and social development of the region should be assessed by some indicators and criteria. It is not clear exactly what indicators the authors evaluate their proposals. The author's proposed design of the building, the location of the plots, the zoning scheme of the project (Figure 17), the elements of clean energy (Figure 23) do not represent elements of an agro-industrial complex to promote the economic and social development of the region.
In lines 162-164, a study indicates that Huaraz province, with 169,477 inhabitants, should be prioritized for economic initiatives, while actions against poverty and social inclusion should focus on Huaylas, which has a poverty rate of 18.8%. Additionally, in lines 151-152, it is stated that the commercial development of Ancash is supported by its agro-export potential and strategic location in the north of the country. Therefore, the location and nature of the project are justified as an economic driver for the region, facilitating economic exchange activities. Furthermore, by accommodating agricultural producers currently engaged in informal sales in Huaraz, the project provides various options to formalize their work through industrialization, a collection center, or sales spaces, along with enhanced educational opportunities such as training and research spaces. The project's design contribution with elements of clean energy promotes environmental impact reduction and preserves existing biological biodiversity.
- The scheme of the study is not presented in English (Figure 11) and it is difficult to read it.
Observation has been addressed. The methodological outline has been updated.
- The authors provide statistical material (Figure 6), but for some reason they do not analyze it themselves but refer to scientific literature.
Observation has been lifted. The incorrectly placed citation has been removed.
- Figure 17, Figure 20, Figure 21, and Figure 22 represent the authors' proposals for the project. However, these proposals are not scientifically substantiated. They are technical schemes but without technical scientific justification.
The schemes presented are based on scientific foundations and applied projects.
I think that the articles should be substantially improved.
Paragraphs and conclusions have been added, providing more explanations for better understanding.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsArticle 1
Agroindustrial Complex to Promote the Economic and Social Development of Agricultural Producers of the Callejón de Huaylas, Ancash, Peru 2023
General Comment
It is a good comprehensive paper. I enjoyed reading the paper.
Abstract:
Is not informative. Highlight any unique insights or contributions the study makes to the field.
Introduction
The introductory section is too long. 12 pages! Can be reduced at least by half.
Most of the discussions are very generic and general. The discussion should be aligned with the topic of the study.
In this section.
1. The motivation for the study
2. Brief theoretical framework of the study
3. Problem statement, study gap, and the novelty of the study...
Literature Review
· Break the introductory section in two and put Literature Review as section 2.
· The problem statement and the research gap of this study is not clear. The literature review should inform these aspects.
· The author(s) should situate their work in relation to existing knowledge/ literature.
Section 2: Materials and Methods
Good.
Section 3: Results
Well written.
In the last section, discuss the policy implications of this study, i.e., point out (highlight) the main lesson for the policy makers and practitioners.
Additional comments
· Line 104 and 110: “Farmers are also key players within the production chain, according to the book Agricultural Economics.” Please provide a proper citation and reference.
· Table 2 is a copy and paste. Please rewrite.
Decision:
Accept with REVISION
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
General Comment
It is a good and comprehensive article. I enjoyed reading the paper.
Abstract:
It is not informative. Highlight any unique knowledge or contribution the study makes to the field.
Thank you for the observation. Lines 16 and 17 now detail the clean energy applications proposed in the project and highlight that the project contributes to reducing informality and promoting inclusion and equity.
Introduction
The introductory section is too long. 12 pages! It can be reduced by at least half.
Consideration was given to dividing it with the literature review in section 2.
Most discussions are very generic and general. The discussion should be aligned with the study's topic.
In this section:
- The motivation for the study.
- Brief theoretical framework of the study.
- Statement of the problem, research gap, and novelty of the study.
Consideration was given to adding more paragraphs aligned with the study's topic.
Literature Review
Divide the introductory section into two and place the Literature Review as section 2.
The problem statement and research gap of this study are not clear. The literature review should inform these aspects.
The author(s) should situate their work concerning existing knowledge/literature.
Consideration was given, and section 2 was added.
Section 2: Materials and Methods
Good.
Section 3: Results
Well written.
In the final section, discuss the policy implications of this study, i.e., highlight the main lesson for policymakers and practitioners.
Consideration was given, and the lesson for the government was highlighted in lines 548–557.
Additional Comments
Line 104 and 110: "Farmers are also key players within the production chain, according to the book Agricultural Economics." Provide appropriate citations and references.
The observation was addressed.
Table 2 is a copy and paste. Please rewrite it.
Consideration was given, and Table 02 was removed.
General Comment
It is a good and comprehensive article. I enjoyed reading the paper.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 4 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsDear Editor
After detailed readings in the manuscript entitled: “Agroindustrial Complex to Promote the Economic and Social Development of Agricultural Producers of the Callejón de Huaylas, Ancash, Peru 2023” to propose an architectural project for an agro-industrial complex to promote the socio-economic development of agricultural producers in Callejón de Huaylas, despite agriculture not being a stable market for the development of small producers and exporters, where it stands out in the manuscript that agro-industrial allows an improvement in the quality of life in the agricultural sector. I suggest accepting the manuscript with minor corrections:
1 - Note the existence of keywords equal to the title, this should be reviewed, the idea is to include broader terms.
2-The study's global importance should be better included at the end of the introduction.
3 - Improve the resolution of Figure 4. Out of focus.
4-The maps in Figures 1, 5, 12, and 14 require geographic parameters such as north and scale.
5 - Figures 8, 9 and 10 have images of people, I suggest covering them with stripes to preserve their identities, so that there are no future problems with using personal images.
6 - The methodology is well-founded. The authors did a good job. Congratulations.
7 - The results are precise and correctly discussed.
8 - The conclusion is well-founded, and the quality of the English used in the text is clear and understandable. Congratulations.
Author Response
Dear Editor
After detailed readings in the manuscript entitled: “Agroindustrial Complex to Promote the Economic and Social Development of Agricultural Producers of the Callejón de Huaylas, Ancash, Peru 2023” to propose an architectural project for an agro-industrial complex to promote the socio-economic development of agricultural producers in Callejón de Huaylas, despite agriculture not being a stable market for the development of small producers and exporters, where it stands out in the manuscript that agro-industrial allows an improvement in the quality of life in the agricultural sector. I suggest accepting the manuscript with minor corrections:
1 - Note the existence of keywords equal to the title, this should be reviewed, the idea is to include broader terms.
2-The study's global importance should be better included at the end of the introduction.
Observation has been addressed
3 - Improve the resolution of Figure 4. Out of focus.
Observation has been addressed
4-The maps in Figures 1, 5, 12, and 14 require geographic parameters such as north and scale.
Observation has been addressed
5 - Figures 8, 9, and 10 have images of people, I suggest covering them with stripes to preserve their identities so that there are no future problems with using personal images.
Observation has been addressed
6 - The methodology is well-founded. The authors did a good job. Congratulations.
7 - The results are precise and correctly discussed.
8 - The conclusion is well-founded, and the quality of the English used in the text is clear and understandable. Congratulations.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe text between lines 198 and 200 is in Spanish.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageEnglish checking is necessary.
Author Response
The introduction is too general and it should describe the recent research relevant to the topic of the article.
In lines 131–136, the impact of accessing foreign markets on farmers wishing to export is mentioned. By adopting new agricultural practices, it positively affects the biological diversity, which represents not only sustainability but also the economic growth of a country.
The methodology should be described in a text. It was written in a table in Spanish.
The methodology outline was updated in English. Additionally, it is described in the paragraph between lines 387–393.
Some texts about climate are not necessary as well as other descriptions of the history of agriculture (especially BC) and about types of fruits and vegetables. Instead of these paragraphs, the recent research should be elaborated and discussed. A research gap should be found.
Observation addressed. The paragraph in lines 53-60 was removed.
At the same time, Discussion is missing as well as pro-and-cons argumentation. The conclusion is too general and modest.
Observation addressed.
There are a lot of texts in Spanish - Figure 2, Figure 3 (text in Figure), Figure 4 (legend), Table 2 is not in English, the text of 3.2.
Observation addressed.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsI checked that the comments I suggested are fully addressed.
Author Response
General Comment
It is a good and comprehensive article. I enjoyed reading the paper.
Abstract:
It is not informative. Highlight any unique knowledge or contribution the study makes to the field.
Thank you for the observation. Lines 16 and 17 now detail the clean energy applications proposed in the project and highlight that the project contributes to reducing informality and promoting inclusion and equity.
Introduction
The introductory section is too long. 12 pages! It can be reduced by at least half.
Consideration was given to dividing it with the literature review in section 2.
Most discussions are very generic and general. The discussion should be aligned with the study's topic.
In this section:
- The motivation for the study.
- Brief theoretical framework of the study.
- Statement of the problem, research gap, and novelty of the study.
Consideration was given to adding more paragraphs aligned with the study's topic.
Literature Review
Divide the introductory section into two and place the Literature Review as section 2.
The problem statement and research gap of this study are not clear. The literature review should inform these aspects.
The author(s) should situate their work in relation to existing knowledge/literature.
Consideration was given, and section 2 was added.
Section 2: Materials and Methods
Good.
Section 3: Results
Well written.
In the final section, discuss the policy implications of this study, i.e., highlight the main lesson for policymakers and practitioners.
Consideration was given, and the lesson for the government was highlighted in lines 548–557.
Additional Comments
Line 104 and 110: "Farmers are also key players within the production chain, according to the book Agricultural Economics." Provide appropriate citation and reference.
Observation was addressed.
Table 2 is a copy and paste. Please rewrite it.
Consideration was given, and Table 02 was removed.
General Comment
It is a good and comprehensive article. I enjoyed reading the paper.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
