Next Article in Journal
Continuous Electrocoagulation for a Sustainable Water Treatment: Effects of Electrode Configuration, Electrical Connection Mode, and Polarity Reversal on Fluoride Removal
Previous Article in Journal
Decision-Making Approach to Design a Sustainable Photovoltaic Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Market Share for Electric Vehicle Energy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synergistic Effects of Azospirillum brasilense and Nitrogen Doses on Wheat Flour Characteristics and Yields of Reducing Sugars Obtained by Subcritical Water Hydrolysis from Bran

by
Giovani L. Zabot
1,*,
Luciano O. Martins
2,
Carolina E. Demaman Oro
1,
Maicon S. N. dos Santos
1,
João H. Wancura
1,
Renan Pfeifenberg
1,
Tainah da R. Machado
1,
Leonardo Rusch
1,
Larissa Friedrich
1,
Rafaela M. Assunção
1,
Ricardo B. da Rosa
1,
João M. L. Bittencourt
1,
Alberto E. Knies
2,
Francini B. da Silva
3 and
Marcus V. Tres
1,*
1
Laboratory of Agroindustrial Processes Engineering (LAPE), Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Taufik Germano Rd, 3013, Cachoeira do Sul 96503-205, Brazil
2
Campus of Cachoeira do Sul, State University of Rio Grande do Sul (UERGS), Sete de Setembro St, 1040, Cachoeira do Sul 96508-010, Brazil
3
Moinho Tres Ltda, Pinhal 98345-000, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(13), 5764; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135764
Submission received: 12 June 2024 / Revised: 29 June 2024 / Accepted: 3 July 2024 / Published: 6 July 2024

Abstract

:
The synergistic interactions between nitrogen doses and microbial inoculation in crops indicate the potential for integrated nutrient management strategies in plant cultivation. Therefore, this study investigated the interactive effects of nitrogen doses and Azospirillum brasilense inoculation on wheat flour characteristics in terms of the falling number and color parameters and yields of reducing sugars obtained by subcritical water hydrolysis (SWH) from wheat bran. The strip-plot experimental design, bifactorial with three replications, was applied. Factor A was three wheat cultivars: ORS Agile (AGI), ORS Feroz (FER), and TSZ Dominadore (DOM). Factor D was five nitrogen doses in the topdressing: 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 kg ha−1. The lowest value of falling number of 332 s was achieved with flour from FER cultivar using a nitrogen dose of 80 kg ha−1 with A. brasilense inoculation. The SWH produced yields of reducing sugars (YRS) from wheat bran of up to 6.74 ± 0.18 g (100 g of wheat bran)−1 for the cultivar DOM when using a nitrogen dose of 60 kg ha−1 associated with A. brasilense inoculation. In this cultivation condition, the falling number was 408 s and the color parameters were L* of 92.49, a* of −0.26, and b* of 11.91. In the other conditions, the YRS ranged from 2.93 ± 0.63 to 6.52 ± 0.04 g (100 g of wheat bran)−1. Both flour and bran are nutritional products with high application potential, and this study indicated SWH as a promising technique to dissociate the lignocellulosic complex of wheat bran without using hazardous solvents.

1. Introduction

On a global scale, there is a pressing demand to enhance crop yield and preserve soil fertility while mitigating environmental repercussions. The available nitrogen sources for crop production primarily encompass four key steps: (i) nitrogen mineralization from indigenous soil organic matter; (ii) nitrogen derived from biological fixation facilitated by legume-associated rhizobial bacteria; (iii) synthetic nitrogen fertilizers; and (iv) nitrogen-rich manures, composts, biosolids, agroindustrial by-products, and assorted organic wastes. Farmers can prioritize the utilization of these diverse nitrogen sources through strategic management practices [1].
Wheat (Triticum aestivum) stands as a cornerstone among field crops, demanding substantial nitrogen inputs to ensure both abundant yields and superior quality. However, some nitrogen sources are costly investments for producers and are susceptible to environmental losses that contribute to pollution and ecological decline. While optimal nitrogen levels are essential for cultivating top-tier wheat crops, the efficiency of nitrogen utilization remains modest, particularly at elevated fertilization levels. Unutilized nitrogen can exacerbate environmental issues through runoff, leaching, and volatilization, amplifying negative impacts on ecosystems [2]. Therefore, it is important to devise strategies aimed at augmenting plant nitrogen uptake from the soil, aiming to enhance both plant yield and the quality of flour and bran while mitigating adverse environmental impacts [3].
Biological nitrogen fixation offers a promising strategy for reducing nitrogen fertilizer use and mitigating natural resource pollution in wheat cultivation. Diazotrophic bacteria, such as Azospirillum spp., play a pivotal role in this process, promoting nutrient and water absorption and resistance to various stresses. Inoculation with A. brasilense has shown significant benefits in wheat, such as increased grain yield and nutrient content [4].
Wheat flour takes center stage in a wide array of food items, from bread and cakes to biscuits, doughnuts, crackers, cookies, pasta, and noodles [5]. The viscoelastic characteristics of wheat dough render it well suited for a variety of bakery items, with gluten proteins playing a pivotal role in defining the quality of wheat-based baked goods [6,7]. Wheat flour comprises high amounts of starch (up to 75%), water (approximately 14%), and proteins (up to 12%). Also, there are significant amounts of amylose and amylopectin in starch of up to 28% and 75%, respectively [8].
Wheat bran is the main by-product resulting from wheat processing in the flour production process. More than 150 million tons of wheat bran are produced every year. Even though most of it is discarded into the environment and is not essentially used, the use of wheat bran is due to the amounts of carbohydrates (up to 56%), starch (up to 24.9%), and protein (up to 18.4%). Furthermore, significant levels of fiber and phenolic compounds are found, which are highly important in indicating the nutritional quality of grains [9]. Nonetheless, wheat grain has restricted solubility in water, mainly due to a significant amount of hydrophobic amino acids. This scenario requires the modification of wheat grain to enhance its functional and textural properties and increase the quality of the final product [10].
Wheat bran constitutes a highly rigid matrix of cellulose (40–50%), hemicellulose (25–35%), and lignin (15–20%) [11]. Due to the solid and resistant structure of lignocellulosic biomass, the accessibility to individual components is highly limited. Therefore, considering the distinction in the composition of different biomasses of the same lignocellulosic material, the use of a certain pre-treatment tool for all biomaterials is uncertain. One of the accepted universal methods comprises the action of hydrolysis on the hemicellulose fragment or direct dissolution of lignin, significantly enhancing contact with the lignocellulosic material and promoting a high conversion of the compounds [12]. Among the different pre-treatment strategies for breaking down the outer layer, the exploration of hydrothermal technologies is an attractive alternative, since wet lignocellulosic biomass, together with high extraction temperatures, causes the degradation of hemicellulose and displacement of the lignin, encouraging higher accessibility to cellulose structures [13].
Hydrothermal technologies are physical and chemical pretreatment methods, such as steam explosion, autohydrolysis, wet oxidation, liquid hot water, and subcritical water hydrolysis (SWH). Subcritical water demonstrates efficacy in mass transfer processes like dissociating compounds from organic materials [14]. SWH emerges as an efficient method due to its ability to break down hemicellulose biopolymers into simple sugars like xylose and arabinose, as well as into smaller molecules suitable for downstream fermentation processes [15,16]. Some studies indicate promising results in the use of SHW for the conversion of lignocellulose into compounds of industrial interest. The use of SHW in a temperature range of 180–260 °C, water/solid mass ratio of 15–30 g water (g biomass)−1, and reaction time of 15 min indicated up to 27.1 ± 6.9 g reducing sugars (100 g biomass)−1 in pecan shells [12]. Furthermore, under experimental conditions of temperature (180–260 °C), water/solid mass ratio (9–18 g of water (g soybean straw)−1 and 7.5–15 g of water (g soybean hull)−1), and a reaction time of 15 min, up to 9.56 ± 0.53 g (100 g biomass)−1 were obtained for soybean straw and 10.15 ± 0.50 g (100 g biomass)−1 for soybean hulls, as well as an efficiency of up to 23.65 ± 1.32 g (100 g carbohydrates)−1 [17]. Corn biomasses under temperature conditions of 220 °C, a water/solid mass ratio of 15 g water (g biomass)−1, and a reaction time of 5 min indicated up to 6.9 ± 1.4 g reducing sugars (100 g biomass)−1 for corn cob and 6.5 ± 4.6 g reducing sugars (100 g biomass)−1 for corn straw [18]. This process holds promise as a cost-effective approach for industrial applications. Therefore, this work reports the characteristics of flour and yields of reducing sugars (YRS) from the bran of three wheat cultivars subjected to five amounts of nitrogen fertilization in topdressing in the Central Region of Rio Grande do Sul with and without inoculation of A. brasilense.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design, Cultivars, Harvest, and Analysis

The experiment was conducted at the Agronomic Station belonging to the State University of Rio Grande do Sul, located in Cachoeira do Sul, Brazil (29°53′ S and 53°00′ W, altitude of 125 m). The local soil is dystrophic red loam and the region’s climate is subtropical, with an average annual temperature of 19.3 °C and an average annual rainfall of 1665 mm, with no defined dry season. For inoculation, Azospirillum brasilense strain Ab-V5 was employed with a concentration of 2 × 108 colony forming units per milliliter (CFU mL−1), with a foliar application at a dose of 0.3 L/ha. The inoculation procedure was conducted in association with the first nitrogen topdressing.
The experimental design was in strips with subdivided plots with 3 replications in a bifactorial scheme. Factor A consisted of three wheat cultivars (ORS Agile (AGI), ORS Feroz (FER), and TSZ Dominadore (DOM)), and factor D consisted of five amounts of nitrogen fertilization in topdressing (0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 kg ha−1). Visual information about the design, sowing, pesticide application, and harvest is presented in Figure 1.
The experiment was implemented after harvesting soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). The sowing density was 130 kg seeds ha−1 for all cultivars in a direct planting sowing system using a fine grain seeder with 17 rows and a sowing depth of 3 cm. The plots consisted of 17 wheat crop rows (Figure 1B), spaced 17 cm (3.15 m wide) and 3.33 m long, totaling an area of 10.5 m2 per plot. On the same day after sowing, base fertilization was performed using NPK fertilizer in a 5-20-20 formulation at 300 kg ha−1. Topdressing fertilization was performed at the tillering stage in a single application, using urea with 45% nitrogen as a source, manually applied to the developing crop and with the appropriate humidity factor for application. Urea and NPK applications were carried out based on soil analysis for an expected productivity of 3000 kg ha−1 [4]. To maintain the health of the culture, its development was monitored (Figure 1C). The control of weeds, pests and diseases was carried out in accordance with crop recommendations using 2,4-D amine and Difeconazole. In the maturation phase, close to harvest, the height of the plants and the length of the main stem were evaluated (Figure 1D).

2.2. Flour Analysis

In the middle of each plot, 1 m² was harvested and threshed (Figure 1E) to obtain the wheat flour. The wheat flour’s moisture, Falling number, and color (L*, a*, and b*) were determined using the AACC 44-15A, 56-81B, and 14–22 procedures, respectively [4].

2.3. Subcritical Water Hydrolysis of Wheat Bran

The subcritical water hydrolysis (SWH) process was performed in a semi-continuous process using a technological apparatus described in previous studies [12,16]. For each hydrolysis test, approximately 20 g of wheat bran was loaded into a stainless steel reactor of 50 mL. The pressurization was performed with distilled water and, thereafter, it was heated. Both pressure and temperature were controlled to reach 30 MPa and 220 °C, respectively. This process condition was defined based on previous studies [12,16,17]. After reaching the desired pressure and temperature, a static time of 20 min was applied. In the sequence, the dynamic SWH was carried out for 45 min with a water flow rate of 15 mL min−1. The hydrolyzed solutions were collected in glass amber flasks at intervals of 0.5 min, 1 min, 3 min, 5 min, 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, 40 min, and 45 min. The assays were conducted in triplicates and the mean values and standard deviation were considered for data presentation.

2.4. Total Reducing Sugars

The determination of the total reducing sugars was performed using the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method [12,16]. Absorbance was measured with a spectrophotometer (UV-1900, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at a wavelength of 540 nm [18]. According to previous studies, for each hydrolyzed solution test, the yield of reducing sugars (YRS, g (100 g bran)−1) was determined by Equation (1) [12].
Y R S = m R S m S A × 100
where mRS is the accumulated mass (g) of total reducing sugars in the accumulated hydrolyzed solution; mSA is the initial mass (g) of wheat bran charged into the reactor vessel.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The collected data of accumulated YRS at 45 min for each wheat cultivar were subjected to statistical analysis using the software Minitab® 18.0. The data were evaluated in terms of homogeneity and normality. Thereafter, the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was applied at a 95% confidence level and, when significant, the means were compared through Tukey’s test.

3. Results

3.1. Wheat Flour

The results of moisture, falling number, and color parameters of wheat flour from the AGI, DOM, and FER cultivars with and without A. brasilense inoculation are shown in Table 1. All parameter results evaluated were similar to the results reported by the research group in a previous study [4], and are within the standard parameters for wheat flour.

3.2. Subcritical Water Hydrolysis of Wheat Bran

The kinetics of the YRS obtained under different doses of nitrogen (0–80 kg ha−1) with and without bacteria inoculations are shown in Figure 2, and the statistical comparisons are presented in Table 2.
Considering the AGI cultivar, seven treatments presented the highest values of YRS, of which six were inoculated with A. brasilense. Similarly, for FER cultivar, four treatments presented the highest values of YRS, of which three were inoculated with A. brasilense (Table 2). Otherwise, for the DOM cultivar, no pattern was seen because seven samples did not statistically differ from each other (equal uppercase letter, A), which comprises either a low dose of nitrogen with bacteria inoculation or a high dose of nitrogen without bacteria inoculation.
Regarding the kinetics of YRS (Figure 2), the SWH presented different behaviors for the different conditions of nitrogen dose (kg ha−1) and inoculation of A. brasilense. For example, for conditions such as 80 kg ha−1 of nitrogen with and without inoculation for AGI, 60 kg ha−1 of nitrogen with inoculation for DOM, and 80 kg ha−1 of nitrogen with inoculation for FER, the YRS remained increasing with high rates until the final hydrolysis time of 45 min. For instance, for the cultivars AGI, DOM, and FER, maximum absolute values of YRS of 6.52, 6.74, and 6.01 g (100 g wheat bran)−1 were obtained, respectively, at 45 min of SWH. Otherwise, for conditions such as 20 kg ha−1 of nitrogen without inoculation for AGI and FER, and 0 kg ha−1 of nitrogen without inoculation for DOM, the YRS became approximately constant after 20 min of reaction. Therefore, based on the kinetic profile (Figure 2), most of the wheat bran samples from conditions with A. brasilense inoculation at higher doses of nitrogen presented higher YRS rates in the first 30 min of SWH.

4. Discussion

A variation in moisture, falling number, and color parameters (L*, a*, b*) of wheat flour was obtained as a function of different cultivation conditions. In the case of AGI, A. brasilense inoculation tends to slightly reduce moisture levels, with non-pattern effects across different nitrogen doses. Different responses in falling number and color parameters are observed, indicating interactions between inoculation and nitrogen levels in terms of quality attributes. The falling number represents the diastatic potential of wheat flour, through correlations between the viscosity of gelatinized starch and the activity of the alpha-amylase enzyme. Low falling number values, generally lower than 200 s, are not desired, as starch breakdown will be rapid and there will be an excess of sugar in the process, leading to uncontrolled fermentation and accentuated caramelization of the dough during baking (Maillard reaction).
Commonly, the use of wheat flour is based on its falling number. Flour with high diastatic activity can generate soft dough. Otherwise, flours with low diastatic activity generate hard dough, which directly interferes with the texture and uniformity of the final product. For values ranging from 200 to 250 s, the application is for sweet cookies and cakes. For 225 to 275 s, the application is for fermented biscuits and breads. For values larger than 350 s, the recommended use is for pasta. Therefore, in this study, the falling number ranged from 332 to 498 s, which is a characteristic that indicates the use of flour for pasta preparations. Overall, the falling number presented different values between the conditions tested, especially related to nitrogen levels. For AGI and FER cultivars, the inoculation of A. brasilense at a nitrogen dose of 40 kg ha−1 resulted in values of falling number approximately 20% lower than the same condition without inoculation. This is most likely caused by a favorable combined condition of biological nitrogen fixation with such bacteria, causing an influence on the vegetal tissues and, consequently, grains characteristics. In such a case, it produced “softer” grains with higher enzymatic activity. However, for the DOM cultivar under this same experimental condition, the values of falling number were very similar. Therefore, it suggests that there are specific interactions between wheat genetics and fertilization, without a clear pattern.
The color parameters L*, a*, and b* indicate a wheat flour with luminosity near to white and tonalities slightly tending to yellow. The lower the extraction, the lighter the color of the flour, with wheat flour corresponding to approximately 80% extraction, and wholemeal flour corresponding to that with 100% extraction. In general, grains with a hard texture produce darker flours and soft grains produce lighter flours. For the fresh pasta segment, the preference is for flours with a lighter color because the consumer evaluates color as a synonym for quality.
For the SWH of wheat bran, according to the kinetic performance, the YRS for the reaction time increased up to 45 min of hydrolysis. The conditions applied in the study indicated an accumulated solvent-to-feed mass ratio of approximately 22.5 g water (g bran)−1. The temperature used in the process (220 °C) was defined taking into account previous studies [12,16]. High temperatures reported a drop in YRS because the compounds can suffer severe thermal degradation, reducing the amount of sugars available in samples. Lower temperatures cannot reach the desired dissociation of longer chains of cellulose. Therefore, the temperature of 220 °C in the SWH procedure resulted in the rupture of water molecules into ions, significantly increasing the concentration of H3O+, and enhancing the conversion of carbohydrate molecules into sugars of lower chains [19].
An increase in YRS is seen for most assays until the total reaction time of 45 min. For all cultivars, especially AGI, the inoculation with A. brasilense is a promising strategy to intensify wheat production through increased nitrogen fixation [20], phytohormone synthesis [21], higher availability of nutrients [22], and higher drought tolerance [23], producing bran with better characteristics to hydrolysis. Nonetheless, studies indicate that inoculation with A. brasilense does not always increase productivity and, consequently, the amount of free sugars [24]. Direct inoculation responses are active in plants in diverse situations, such as drought, foliar diseases, competition with weeds, and deficiencies in solar radiation, water availability, and nutrients [25]. This scenario may be related to the maximum absolute expression of YRS for the DOM cultivar, which presented up to 6.74 g (100 g bran)−1 with A. brasilense inoculation. When the abiotic conditions at the experiment site are adverse, the DOM and FER cultivars may have benefited significantly from A. brasilense inoculation. It promotes the direct production of the plants’ antioxidants, which can help protect the plant from oxidative stress by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes and stimulating the synthesis of growth hormones, increasing the plants’ stress tolerance capacity [25].
It is not possible to make a straightforward comparison of yields because no study was found in the scientific literature with a similar approach. Some studies used ultrafast hydrolysis in supercritical water to recover sugars from wheat bran. One example is the FASTSUGARS process, which uses supercritical water at 400 °C and 25 MPa to hydrolyze wheat bran into sugars at reaction times lower than 1 s. The conversion of cellulose and hemicellulose into sugars of lower chain ranged from approximately 61 to 65% [26]. The conversion of wheat bran into soluble saccharides such as glucose, xylose and arabinose at 400 °C and 25 MPa with reaction times between 0.2 and 1 s was also reported. The highest recovery of cellulose and hemicellulose as soluble sugars (73% w/w) was achieved at 0.19 s of reaction time. An increase in the reaction time decreased the yield of cellulose and hemicellulose. The main hydrolysis product was glycolaldehyde, yielding 20% (w/w) at 0.22 s of reaction time [27]. Although these studies present faster reactions, the temperatures are high. Also, the values of YRS were not provided in such studies. Only the conversion rates were presented, which limits a straightforward comparison of mass yields of recovered sugars. Therefore, the current work advances knowledge by demonstrating good values of YRS using SWH at 220 °C and 25 MPa from samples of bran after the wheat was submitted to different treatments in the field.
Increasing doses of nitrogen have direct effects on plant growth and biochemical composition, including levels of reducing sugars in wheat biomass [28]. Nitrogen is a critical nutrient for plant growth and development, playing a key role in protein synthesis, enzyme activity, and general metabolism. Fertilization with nitrogen can promote plant growth and improve photosynthesis, leading to increased production of carbohydrates, including reducing sugars such as glucose and fructose [4]. The results with inoculation of A. brasilense may have resulted in excessive doses for the plants, which could cause serious imbalances in the absorption of nutrients by the plants, potentially affecting their metabolism [29]. High levels of nitrogen enhance the wheat’s initial growth, based on the accumulation of carbohydrates in storage organs, such as grains. This scenario may result in lower levels of reducing sugars in the biomass, as a large portion of the nutrients are diverted to the leaves and structural components, rather than to productive reserves [30,31].

5. Conclusions

This study presents a strategy between nitrogen doses and microbial inoculation in producing wheat flour and bran for specific applications. The flour has characteristics to be used for pasta production, while the bran can be dissociated through SWH to produce reducing sugars. A YRS of 6.74 g (100 g wheat bran)−1, obtained by SWH at 220 °C and 30 MPa, was related to the cultivar DOM under the conditions of 60 kg ha−1 with A. brasilense inoculation, which is a favorable condition to produce the raw material for hydrolysis. The integration of microbial inoculation with varying nitrogen fertilization levels exerts a positive influence on yield indicators and metabolic components, signifying the potential for integrated nutrient management strategies in enhancing wheat production efficiency. These results highlight the importance of tailored nutrient management approaches and the significant role of microbial inoculation in optimizing crop performance and sustainability. Many integrated products can be reached, with flour and bran being able to produce many other derivatives, from candies to platform chemicals.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. The paper conceptualization was accomplished by M.V.T., and G.L.Z. The original draft as well as review & editing were performed by M.V.T., G.L.Z., C.E.D.O., J.H.W., L.O.M. and A.E.K., M.S.N.d.S., L.O.M., R.P., T.d.R.M., L.R., L.F., R.M.A., R.B.d.R., J.M.L.B. and F.B.d.S. worked on experimental investigation. L.O.M., R.P., T.d.R.M., L.R., L.F., R.M.A., R.B.d.R., J.M.L.B. and F.B.d.S. worked on methodologies approach and formal analysis. Experimental validation and data curation was accomplished by C.E.D.O., J.H.W. and M.S.N.d.S., M.V.T., J.H.W. and M.S.N.d.S. also worked on manuscript visualization. M.V.T. and G.L.Z. also contributed with resources. M.V.T., G.L.Z. and A.E.K. were responsible for the supervision. M.V.T. also worked on project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that they received financial support and grants from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq: 404308/2023-6; 302593/2023-3 308067/2021-5; 306241/2020-0; 428180/2018-3), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES: 001), and the Research Support Foundation of the State of Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS: 21/2551-0000683-8; 21/2551-0002253-1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data used in the research are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Moinho Tres Ltda for providing the analysis of wheat flour.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Francini B. da Silva was employed by the company Moinho Tres Ltda. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Flohr, B.M.; Meier, E.A.; Hunt, J.R.; McBeath, T.M.; Llewellyn, R.S. A modelled quantification of reduced nitrogen fertiliser requirement and associated trade-offs from inclusion of legumes and fallows in wheat-based crop sequences. Field Crops Res. 2024, 307, 109236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Burton, A.; Häner, L.L.; Schaad, N.; Strebel, S.; Vuille-dit-Bille, N.; Bongiovani, P.d.F.; Holzkämper, A.; Pellet, D.; Herrera, J.M. Evaluating nitrogen fertilization strategies to optimize yield and grain nitrogen content in top winter wheat varieties across Switzerland. Field Crops Res. 2024, 307, 109251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mawodza, T.; Zhou, H.; Atkinson, B.S.; Atkinson, J.A.; Sturrock, C.J.; Riche, A.B.; Whalley, W.R.; Hawkesford, M.J.; Cooper, H.V.; Mooney, S.J. Soil structure has a greater effect on the rooting of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) than nitrogen fertilisation rate or genotype. Rhizosphere 2023, 27, 100770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. da Silva, J.A.S.; Dos Santos, M.S.N.; Oro, C.E.D.; de Moura, D.B.; da Silva, F.B.; da Silva, P.N.; Knies, A.E.; Zabot, G.L.; Tres, M.V. Interactive Performance of Wheat Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Growth-Promoting Bacteria. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2023, 13, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, J.; Zhu, S.; Zhao, G. Rapid determination of total protein and wet gluten in commercial wheat flour using siSVR-NIR. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1939–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arata, G.J.; Martínez, M.; Elguezábal, C.; Rojas, D.; Cristos, D.; Dinolfo, M.I.; Arata, A.F. Effects of sowing date, nitrogen fertilization, and Fusarium graminearum in an Argentinean bread wheat: Integrated analysis of disease parameters, mycotoxin contamination, grain quality, and seed deterioration. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022, 107, 104364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Janssen, F.; Mesure, E.; Wouters, A.G.B. Relating the protein composition and air-water interfacial properties of aqueous flour extracts from wheats grown at different nitrogen fertilization levels. Food Chem. 2022, 386, 132831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, D.; Guan, W.; Wu, F.; Jin, Y.; Yang, N.; Jin, Z.; Xu, X. Improvement of baked wheat chips quality by protease-mediated enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat flour. LWT 2022, 157, 113043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Si, D.; Shang, T.; Liu, X.; Zheng, Z.; Hu, Q.; Hu, C.; Zhang, R. Production and characterization of functional wheat bran hydrolysate rich in reducing sugars, xylooligosaccharides and phenolic acids. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 27, e00511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, H.; Liu, B. Effect of limited hydrolysis with endopeptidase on bitterness properties of wheat gluten hydrolysates. LWT 2024, 198, 115988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Araya-Farias, M.; Husson, E.; Saavedra-Torrico, J.; Gérard, D.; Roulard, R.; Gosselin, I.; Rakotoarivonina, H.; Lambertyn, V.; Rémond, C.; Sarazin, C. Wheat Bran Pretreatment by Room Temperature Ionic Liquid-Water Mixture: Optimization of Process Conditions by PLS-Surface Response Design. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. do Santos, M.S.N.; Zabot, G.L.; Mazutti, M.A.; Ugalde, G.A.; Rezzadori, K.; Tres, M.V. Optimization of subcritical water hydrolysis of pecan wastes biomasses in a semi-continuous mode. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 306, 123129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Glaser, S.J.; Al-Rudainy, B.; Hatti-Kaul, R.; Galbe, M. Wheat bran fractionation: Effect of steam explosion and hydrotropic extraction conditions on the recovery of sugars and lignin. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 195, 116405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sarker, T.R.; Pattnaik, F.; Nanda, S.; Dalai, A.K.; Meda, V.; Naik, S. Hydrothermal pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic biomass: A review of steam explosion and subcritical water hydrolysis. Chemosphere 2021, 284, 131372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Z.H.; Cheng, W.L.; Li, X.D.; Wang, X.; Yang, F.W.; Xiao, J.S.; Li, Y.X.; Zhao, G.P. Extraction, bioactive function and application of wheat germ protein/peptides: A review. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2023, 6, 100512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Abaide, E.R.; Mortari, S.R.; Ugalde, G.; Valério, A.; Amorim, S.M.; Di Luccio, M.; Moreira, R.d.F.P.M.; Kuhn, R.C.; Priamo, W.L.; Tres, M.V.; et al. Subcritical water hydrolysis of rice straw in a semi-continuous mode. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 209, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vedovatto, F.; Ugalde, G.; Bonatto, C.; Bazoti, S.F.; Treichel, H.; Mazutti, M.A.; Zabot, G.L.; Tres, M.V. Subcritical water hydrolysis of soybean residues for obtaining fermentable sugars. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2021, 167, 105043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. da Cunha, E.S.L.; Dos Santos, M.S.N.; da Silva, J.F.; de Moraes, J.R.; Silveira, N.M.; Ferreira, R.d.O.; de Souza, V.L.; Lopes, L.R.; Lopes, P.T.; Knies, A.E.; et al. Agronomic and chemical performance of corn cultivars under inoculation and co-inoculation with diazotrophic bacteria. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 11, 11765–11777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fan, R.; Gao, Y. Maillard and Hydrolytic Reactions in Subcritical Water Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Licorice. Molecules 2022, 27, 6851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Galindo, F.S.; Pagliari, P.H.; Fernandes, G.C.; Rodrigues, W.L.; Boleta, E.H.M.; Jalal, A.; Céu, E.G.O.; de Lima, B.H.; Lavres, J.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M. Improving Sustainable Field-Grown Wheat Production with Azospirillum brasilense Under Tropical Conditions: A Potential Tool for Improving Nitrogen Management. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 821628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Silva, P.S.T.; Cassiolato, A.M.R.; Galindo, F.S.; Jalal, A.; Nogueira, T.A.R.; Oliveira, C.E.d.S.; Filho, M.C.M.T. Azospirillum brasilense and Zinc Rates Effect on Fungal Root Colonization and Yield of Wheat-Maize in Tropical Savannah Conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Artyszak, A.; Gozdowski, D. Is it possible to maintain the quantity and quality of winter wheat grain by replacing part of the mineral nitrogen dose by growth activators and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (Pgpr)? Sustainability 2021, 13, 5834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Camaille, M.; Fabre, N.; Clément, C.; Barka, E.A. Advances in wheat physiology in response to drought and the role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to trigger drought tolerance. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Boleta, E.H.M.; Shintate Galindo, F.; Jalal, A.; Santini, J.M.K.; Rodrigues, W.L.; Lima, B.H.d.; Arf, O.; Silva, M.R.d.; Buzetti, S.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M. Inoculation with Growth-Promoting Bacteria Azospirillum brasilense and Its Effects on Productivity and Nutritional Accumulation of Wheat Cultivars. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 607262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Iqbal, R.; Valipour, M.; Ali, B.; Zulfiqar, U.; Aziz, U.; Zaheer, M.S.; Sarfraz, A.; Javed, M.A.; Afridi, M.S.; Ercisli, S.; et al. Maximizing wheat yield through soil quality enhancement: A combined approach with Azospirillum brasilense and bentonite. Plant Stress 2024, 11, 100321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Martínez, C.M.; Adamovic, T.; Cantero, D.A.; Cocero, M.J. Scaling up the production of sugars from agricultural biomass by ultrafast hydrolysis in supercritical water. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 143, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cantero, D.A.; Martínez, C.; Bermejo, M.D.; Cocero, M.J. Simultaneous and selective recovery of cellulose and hemicellulose fractions from wheat bran by supercritical water hydrolysis. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mariem, S.B.; González-Torralba, J.; Collar, C.; Aranjuelo, I.; Morales, F. Durum wheat grain yield and quality under low and high nitrogen conditions: Insights into natural variation in low-and high-yielding genotypes. Plants 2020, 9, 1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, M.; Wang, H.; Yi, Y.; Ding, J.; Zhu, M.; Li, C.; Guo, W.; Feng, C.; Zhu, X. Effect of nitrogen levels and nitrogen ratios on lodging resistance and yield potential of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, W.; Zhou, X.; Yu, K.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Hu, N.; Liu, Y.; Yao, C.; Yang, X.; Wang, Z.; et al. Spectroscopic Estimation of N Concentration in Wheat Organs for Assessing N Remobilization Under Different Irrigation Regimes. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 657578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Salem, M.A.; Ismail, M.; Radwan, K.H.; Abd-Elhalim, H.M. Unlocking the Potential of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria to Enhance Drought Tolerance in Egyptian Wheat (Triticum aestivum). Sustainability 2024, 16, 4605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental design (A), mechanized sowing (B), spraying of herbicides, fungicides and insecticides (C), measurement of plant height and ear length (D), and area harvested (E); AGI: ORS Agile; DOM: TSZ Dominadore; FER: ORS Feroz; IN: wheat inoculated with A. brasilense; NI: wheat non-inoculated with A. brasilense.
Figure 1. Experimental design (A), mechanized sowing (B), spraying of herbicides, fungicides and insecticides (C), measurement of plant height and ear length (D), and area harvested (E); AGI: ORS Agile; DOM: TSZ Dominadore; FER: ORS Feroz; IN: wheat inoculated with A. brasilense; NI: wheat non-inoculated with A. brasilense.
Sustainability 16 05764 g001
Figure 2. Kinetic yields of reducing sugars (YRS) for hydrolyzed solutions of three cultivars of wheat bran inoculated or not with Azospirillum brasilense and submitted to different doses of nitrogen (0–80 kg ha−1).
Figure 2. Kinetic yields of reducing sugars (YRS) for hydrolyzed solutions of three cultivars of wheat bran inoculated or not with Azospirillum brasilense and submitted to different doses of nitrogen (0–80 kg ha−1).
Sustainability 16 05764 g002aSustainability 16 05764 g002b
Table 1. Moisture, falling number, and color parameters of wheat flour from the AGI, DOM and FER cultivars with and without inoculation of A. brasilense.
Table 1. Moisture, falling number, and color parameters of wheat flour from the AGI, DOM and FER cultivars with and without inoculation of A. brasilense.
CultivarNitrogen Dose (kg ha−1)Inoculation of A. brasilenseMoisture (%)Falling Number (s)L*a*b*
AGI0Yes14.144090.640.5210.97
No14.239991.260.3211.63
20Yes14.139291.500.2411.42
No14.238991.550.2711.30
40Yes14.240091.540.3311.24
No14.249890.710.5011.34
60Yes14.139290.880.4111.67
No14.240890.820.3612.27
80Yes14.241790.500.5111.73
No14.141390.440.5112.03
DOM0Yes14.139892.75−0.3611.58
No14.241392.55−0.4111.86
20Yes14.238092.63−0.3811.86
No14.241292.85−0.4611.84
40Yes14.140292.82−0.3711.76
No14.140192.64−0.3612.08
60Yes14.240892.49−0.2611.91
No14.238292.16−0.3912.94
80Yes14.141892.04−0.2012.20
No14.242292.04−0.2412.30
FER0Yes14.141292.340.1310.08
No14.141292.020.2110.00
20Yes14.242092.090.2310.15
No14.242992.280.219.82
40Yes14.133292.160.1210.50
No14.241891.870.2810.11
60Yes14.141291.920.1610.94
No14.241191.660.2510.31
80Yes14.239992.450.1010.46
No14.239691.830.2410.61
Table 2. Comparisons of means of YRS for hydrolyzed solutions at 45 min of three cultivars of wheat bran inoculated or not with Azospirillum brasilense and submitted to different doses of nitrogen (0–80 kg ha−1).
Table 2. Comparisons of means of YRS for hydrolyzed solutions at 45 min of three cultivars of wheat bran inoculated or not with Azospirillum brasilense and submitted to different doses of nitrogen (0–80 kg ha−1).
Nitrogen Dose (kg ha−1)Inoculation of A. brasilenseYRS (g (100 g bran)−1) *
AGI
80No6.52 A
40Yes6.11 A
80Yes6.08 A
20Yes5.61 AB
0Yes5.37 AB
60Yes4.60 ABC
40No4.21 ABC
0No3.86 BC
60No3.20 BC
20No2.93 C
DOM
60Yes6.74 A
20No6.67 A
20Yes6.61 A
0Yes6.41 A
80Yes6.26 AB
40No6.06 AB
60No5.57 ABC
40Yes4.07 BC
80No4.04 BC
0No3.64 C
FER
40Yes6.01 A
80Yes5.67 AB
40No5.53 ABC
20Yes5.35 ABC
0Yes4.56 BCD
60No4.42 BCD
60Yes4.33 BCD
0No4.04 CD
80No3.53 D
20No3.46 D
* Different uppercase letters within a cultivar indicate significant differences at a 95% confidence level through Tukey’s test; AGI: ORS Agile; DOM: TSZ Dominadore; FER: ORS Feroz (FER).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zabot, G.L.; Martins, L.O.; Oro, C.E.D.; dos Santos, M.S.N.; Wancura, J.H.; Pfeifenberg, R.; Machado, T.d.R.; Rusch, L.; Friedrich, L.; Assunção, R.M.; et al. Synergistic Effects of Azospirillum brasilense and Nitrogen Doses on Wheat Flour Characteristics and Yields of Reducing Sugars Obtained by Subcritical Water Hydrolysis from Bran. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135764

AMA Style

Zabot GL, Martins LO, Oro CED, dos Santos MSN, Wancura JH, Pfeifenberg R, Machado TdR, Rusch L, Friedrich L, Assunção RM, et al. Synergistic Effects of Azospirillum brasilense and Nitrogen Doses on Wheat Flour Characteristics and Yields of Reducing Sugars Obtained by Subcritical Water Hydrolysis from Bran. Sustainability. 2024; 16(13):5764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135764

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zabot, Giovani L., Luciano O. Martins, Carolina E. Demaman Oro, Maicon S. N. dos Santos, João H. Wancura, Renan Pfeifenberg, Tainah da R. Machado, Leonardo Rusch, Larissa Friedrich, Rafaela M. Assunção, and et al. 2024. "Synergistic Effects of Azospirillum brasilense and Nitrogen Doses on Wheat Flour Characteristics and Yields of Reducing Sugars Obtained by Subcritical Water Hydrolysis from Bran" Sustainability 16, no. 13: 5764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135764

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop