1. Introduction
Construction is one of the oldest activities known to humanity. The production and application of concrete for use in buildings is present all over the planet, regardless of the economic and geographical conditions of each country, with Portland cement being the second most consumed material in the world, second only to water [
1]. Thus, considering its high consumption, research has been conducted for many years to evaluate the various conditions of technological performance [
2], durability [
3], potential for the application of new materials [
4], and issues related to its sustainability [
5] materials, such as concrete and mortars. Construction and demolition waste is one of the main sources of recycled aggregate production worldwide, due to its high availability and compatibility [
6,
7].
Currently, the focus on environmental preservation has intensified the reuse of solid waste in civil construction, requiring regulations to support and guide proper disposal and reuse procedures. It is estimated that civil construction consumes between 14% and 50% of the natural resources available on the planet [
8].
Numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate the use of recycled aggregates in civil construction. There is a consensus in the scientific community that the generation of construction and demolition waste is considered an unsustainable activity, as it causes constant environmental degradation. It is estimated that up to 48% of the total urban solid waste generated globally comes from civil construction [
9]. In Brazil, for example, construction companies are responsible for 52% of the construction waste generated, while the remainder is generated informally. Additionally, due to their bulky and high-density nature, the disposal of these wastes creates a significant and irreversible environmental impact [
10]. The use of this waste is an important tool in combating environmental degradation, both directly and indirectly, by reducing the consumption of construction materials derived from the crushing of stones, gravel, and artificial sand. Additionally, recycling not only adds value to the final product but also reintegrates a material that would otherwise remain discarded in landfills for many years. In developing countries, this waste often ends up in unstructured dumpsites.
Research indicates optimization in the mechanical properties of various materials using recycled aggregate, such as increased mechanical strength [
11].
On the other hand, the type of recycled aggregate affects the performance of materials differently. Thus, highlighted an increase in impact resistance when recycled coarse aggregates were used in concrete blocks. They also pointed out that the incorporation of recycled fine aggregates from construction and demolition waste can increase the mechanical strength of concrete due to the particles of non-hydrated cement in the recycled material, remembering that the loss of mechanical strength is a limiting factor for the use of recycled aggregates and is greater when the water/cement ratio is lower. Notwithstanding the above, some authors justified the increase in compressive strength in concretes with recycled fine aggregates due to the pozzolanic effect of fine particles.
The higher fine content in recycled aggregates can improve the transition zone between the cement matrix and the aggregate, contributing to greater concrete compaction. According to [
12], fine particles provide better packing. Since recycled aggregate has higher absorption, it promotes better adhesion between the cement paste and the aggregate through the absorption of the paste and the precipitation of hydration crystals in the aggregate’s pores. The presence of old mortar particles adhered to the grains of recycled aggregate is a significant characteristic that affects the behavior of the concrete. This presence can correlate with higher water absorption, increased porosity, and a lower strength of recycled concrete [
13].
The use of recycled aggregates in paving is the most accepted alternative in the technical field [
14]. The simplest form of recycling is the application of debris in the form of current gravel, in bases, sub-bases, and primary paving layers. Using construction and demolition waste in base, sub-base, and primary layers offers numerous advantages and significantly lowers construction costs compared to those produced with graded gravel or soil additives [
15].
In parallel, artificial stones are innovative materials manufactured with a polymeric resin and a high percentage of natural aggregates, which can be partially replaced by waste. The mechanical properties of artificial stone surpass those of natural stones, as the use of resin in its production results in a less porous material with a lower water absorption rate and better mechanical strength, making them suitable for more demanding applications, such as flooring and wall coverings [
16,
17].
Artificial stone is highly attractive for domestic environments due to its variety and consistency of colors, and resistance to scratches, chips, and stains. The popularity of artificial stone has rapidly increased worldwide. Analyzing the Brazilian ornamental stone market, ABIROCHAS [
18] shows that imports of artificial stones are twice as high as imports of natural stones, as shown in
Figure 1. The cumulative imports of artificial stones over the past ten years have seen an increase of nearly 120%, highlighting its emerging market and emphasizing the importance of research in this area for the development of new materials for the Brazilian market.
However, there is a lack of studies that aim to utilize construction and demolition waste (CDW) in the creation of artificial stones for use as finishes: kitchen and bathroom countertops, stair coverings, and more, replacing natural (ornamental) stones and even various commercially available artificial stones. Given this scenario, this research targets this niche; it seeks to substitute the standard raw material (ornamental stone waste) with CDW in the production of artificial stones. The goal is to achieve a final product that can be used similarly to ornamental stones in finishing applications, with optimized properties. The choice of a thermoset orthophthalic polyester resin for the polymer matrix was due to its cost–benefit ratio, as it initially offers satisfactory mechanical properties at the lowest market price compared to other resins. This also brings a similarity to the research, since many industrially produced composites use polyester resins, including orthophthalic ones. Resins produced with orthophthalic anhydride, known as orthophthalic resins, are commonly used due to their low cost, although they have limited thermal stability and chemical resistance [
19].
A pioneering study on artificial stones was conducted in Taiwan [
20], presenting the results of the production of artificial stone slabs using glass waste, stone fragments, and vacuum vibratory compaction. This research produced artificial stone slabs with unsaturated polymer resin, glass powder, and fine granite aggregates. The tests showed that the composition with 50% glass powder and 50% granite aggregates yielded the best results: compression (148.8 MPa), water absorption (below 0.02%), density (2.45), and flexural strength (51.1 MPa). In Turkey, a 2018 study produced and characterized a hybrid polymer matrix composite [
21]. This research created the composite using epoxy resin, fiberglass, and granite waste, processed with a vacuum helical mixer and cast in a silicone mold. The composition named F5505, with 40% resin, 55% granite, and 5% fiberglass, achieved the best results in terms of high theoretical density, hardness, flexural strength, flexural modulus, and impact resistance. In Malaysia in 2020, another study characterized and evaluated dolomite and kaolin as fillers in the properties of poly-marble art, including twelve types of compositions with different percentages of polyester resin, dolomite, and kaolin. The best results pointed to three types of compositions: D60K15 (25% resin + 60% dolomite + 15% kaolin) with the best water absorption (0.11%); D60K10 (30% resin + 60% dolomite + 10% kaolin) with the best compression (105.43 MPa) and flexural strength (34.1 MPa); and D70% (resin + 70% dolomite) with the best Barcol hardness [
22].
Among the negative impacts of the large amount of CDW generated is the rapid occupation of landfills to accommodate waste, with illegal dumping frequently used worldwide in countries such as China, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Israel, and Brazil. Major cities like Shenzhen (China) and Chennai (India), and countries like Sri Lanka have been seriously affected by disastrous events due to the improper disposal of construction waste [
23].
In Brazil, the numbers related to CDW are alarming. According to the Panorama of Solid Waste in Brazil, published by the Brazilian Association of Public Cleaning and Special Waste Companies, approximately 48 million tons of construction and demolition waste (CDW) were produced in 2021 [
24], This means that 38.4 million tons could be recycled or reused. The same study shows that between 10% and 30% of the construction materials purchased for a project are discarded, indicating that a significant portion of the investment in construction is wasted.
According to the Brazilian Association for the Recycling of Construction and Demolition Waste, it is estimated that in 2021, 520 kg of waste was produced per inhabitant per day. However, of the approximately 290.5 tons of debris generated daily in the country, only 21% is recycled [
25].
The recycling of construction solid waste varies depending on the type of waste being treated. This research focuses on the Recycling of Construction Solid Waste and Construction and Demolition Waste, established by CONAMA Resolution 307, which pertains to Class A (inert) waste: reusable or recyclable waste such as aggregates from construction, demolitions, repairs, renovations of buildings, ceramic components, bricks, blocks, tiles, mortar and concrete, paving, and precast elements [
26].
The recycling of construction waste presents advantages in the environmental, technological, and economic spheres. These advantages include the reuse of materials, reducing the use of non-renewable resources; the reduction of improper disposal; the processing of products; and cost savings by offsetting the purchase of natural raw materials.
Given the high use of concrete worldwide, the demand for aggregates of different diameters extracted from natural stones and/or riverbeds (sand and gravel) causes a range of environmental damages. Furthermore, in the not-too-distant future, the scarcity of these natural resources will become evident, which will certainly cause serious economic damage, especially to developing countries like Brazil. This problem increasingly demands research that points to new efficient and innovative uses for the various waste generated by the construction industry; this research moves in this direction.
Beyond cost efficiency, recycling contributes to the environmental goals of the industry. According to the 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction by the United Nations Environment Programme [
27], carbon dioxide (CO
2) emissions from the sector reached a record 10 billion tons in 2021, 5% higher than the previous year. The 2019 Global Status Report from the International Energy Agency [
28] indicates that in 2018, the construction sector was responsible for 36% of final energy use and 39% of energy- and process-related carbon dioxide emissions.
Moreover, according to the UN [
29], construction is responsible for about 11% of global CO
2 emissions from human activities. This includes emissions associated with the production of building materials, the construction and demolition of buildings, and the operation and maintenance of buildings throughout their life cycle.
In this concerning context, aiming to ease the environmental pressure caused by the construction industry and the ornamental stone mining industry, this research explores new variables for the disposal of construction waste by incorporating it into the composition of artificial stones. This approach directly supports the concept of sustainable development (both environmental and economic), replacing the end-of-life concept of the linear economy with new circular flows of reuse, restoration, and renewal in an integrated circular economy process. This initiative seeks not only to reduce costs in the production of artificial stones but also to promote the large-scale, high-value use of solid waste from one of the fastest-growing sectors on the planet, the construction industry, which predominantly disposes of its waste in landfills or dumps.