Next Article in Journal
The Effect of the National Specially Monitored Firms Program on Water-Polluting Firms’ Green Total Factor Productivity
Previous Article in Journal
Smarter and Cleaner? The Carbon Reduction Effect of Smart Cities: A Perspective on Green Technology Progress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Exploring the Impact of Green Finance and Green Innovation on Resource Efficiency: The Mediating Role of Market Regulations and Environmental Regulations

1
School of Economics, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
Department of Economics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan
3
Faculty of Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, 37701 Jindrichuv Hradec, Czech Republic
4
College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(18), 8047; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188047
Submission received: 29 July 2024 / Revised: 10 September 2024 / Accepted: 12 September 2024 / Published: 14 September 2024

Abstract

Green finance, innovation, and resource efficiency have gained significant traction recently, particularly in resource-rich countries. This study investigates the role of green finance and innovation in resource efficiency with the mediating lens of environmental regulations and market rules. The study employs a structural equation model on a panel of 15 resource-rich countries from 1995 to 2023. The findings illustrate a complicated interplay between the variables. First, the findings show that green financing positively and negatively affects resource efficiency. In contrast, green innovation constantly improves resource efficiency. Market rules have a favorable impact on resource efficiency. Environmental laws, however, hurt resource efficiency. Furthermore, the study reveals that green financing favors market regulations, implying that financial expenditures in green initiatives might strengthen regulatory frameworks that promote market efficiency. In contrast, green finance harms environmental rules, and green innovation harms both market and environmental regulations. In addition, we divided the sample into developed and developing nations and offered a sub-group analysis to take into consideration the variations in the degree of national development and green advances to further improve the analysis. Overall, the study emphasizes the multifaceted role of green finance and innovation in increasing resource efficiency within regulatory frameworks. These findings are critical for policymakers and stakeholders in resource-rich countries seeking to reconcile economic growth with sustainable development.
Keywords: green finance; green innovation; resource efficiency; environmental sustainability; structural equation model green finance; green innovation; resource efficiency; environmental sustainability; structural equation model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, X.; Wang, Q.; Noor, S.; Nazir, R.; Nasrullah, M.J.; Hussain, P.; Larik, S.A. Exploring the Impact of Green Finance and Green Innovation on Resource Efficiency: The Mediating Role of Market Regulations and Environmental Regulations. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8047. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188047

AMA Style

Tang X, Wang Q, Noor S, Nazir R, Nasrullah MJ, Hussain P, Larik SA. Exploring the Impact of Green Finance and Green Innovation on Resource Efficiency: The Mediating Role of Market Regulations and Environmental Regulations. Sustainability. 2024; 16(18):8047. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Xiaoping, Qiong Wang, Shamsa Noor, Rabia Nazir, Muhammad Junaid Nasrullah, Phool Hussain, and Shahbaz Ali Larik. 2024. "Exploring the Impact of Green Finance and Green Innovation on Resource Efficiency: The Mediating Role of Market Regulations and Environmental Regulations" Sustainability 16, no. 18: 8047. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188047

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop