Niche Sustainable Agricultural Production in Colombia: The Case of Territorial Development Agendas and Development Planning in the Province of García Rovira
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review: Planning, Multi-Level Perspective, and Agency
3. Methodology
Context of the Research
4. Results
4.1. The Planning Regime and National Sustainable Development Agendas
4.2. Productive Decline in the Province and the Emergence of the Sustainable Production Niche
4.3. Niche Production: Characteristics, Experimental Variables, and Elements for Future Planning Processes
“Planning could help, but today these processes have had little influence on my productive practices. I found out about them from many of the people I know through forums in my profession where the opportunities and the market for clean production are shown”.(Interviewee 7)
“My family produced corn, but that ceased to be profitable a long time ago. I realised that I was looking for another kind of production, and sustainability is the key for it to be a business to produce. I believe that those who produce with other knowledge can influence many other peasants across the province”.(interviewed 5)
“Other people I know and I have specialised in sustainable production systems due to our knowledge of the market for organic products. Thanks to the fact that many of us have graduated from the university that is in the province, we have implemented innovations that increase efficiency and sustainability. And of course, although it is not easy, we have taken the lead to extend this knowledge beyond our land neighbours who are initially interested”.(Interviewed 2)
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fainstein, S.; Defilippis, J. Readings in Planning Theory, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.; Loayza, N.; Meza, C. Productivity as the Key to Economic Growth and Development. World Bank Research and Policy Briefs No. 108092, 2016. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3249552 (accessed on 15 March 2024).
- Ceballos, G.; Ehrlich, P.; Dirzo, R. Biological Annihilation via the Ongoing Sixth Mass Extinction Signaled by Vertebrate Population Losses and Declines; Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: Mexico City, Mexico; Department of Biology, Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Moncayo, E. Las Políticas Regionales y la Planeación en Colombia: Una Visión Panorámica. Período 1958–2018. 2019. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332109630_Las_politicas_regionales_y_la_planeacion_en_Colombia_una_vision_panoramica_Periodo_1958-2018 (accessed on 15 January 2024).
- Cuervo, L.M.; Délano, M.d.P. Planificación Multiescalar, Regional y Local. Volumen I y II. Serie Seminarios y Conferencias, N° 91 (LC/TS.2019/53); Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL): Santiago de Chile, Chile, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Melgar-Melgar, R.E.; Hall, C. Why ecological economics needs to return to its roots: The biophysical foundation of socio-economic systems. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 169, 106567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Köhler, J.; Geels, F.W.; Kern, F.; Markard, J.; Onsongo, E.; Wieczorek, A.; Alkemade, F.; Avelino, F.; Bergek, A.; Boons, F.; et al. An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2019, 31, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agronet. Available online: https://agronet.gov.co (accessed on 20 April 2024).
- Congress of the Republic of Colombia. Article 6 of Law 388 of 1997. Available online: https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=339#:~:text=ART%C3%8DCULO%206.%2D%20Objeto.,1 (accessed on 12 April 2024).
- Geels, F.W. Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective. Theory Cult. Soc. 2014, 31, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jorgensen, U. Mapping and Navigating Transitions—The Multi-Level Perspective Compared with Arenas of Development; Deptartment of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark: Lyngby, Denmark, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Hundscheid, L.; Wurzinger, M.; Gühnemann, A.; Melcher, A.H.; Stern, T. Rethinking meat consumption—How institutional shifts affect the sustainable protein transition. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 31, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrero, J.; Escobar, J.; y Restrepo, L. Los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible desde una perspectiva socio técnica: Una aproximación multinivel. En Derechos Laborales, fomento económico, informalidad y desarrollo. Serie de documentos legislativos No.9. In Proceedings of the Congreso de la República de Colombia; Páginas: Bogotá, Colombia, 2018; pp. 120–136. [Google Scholar]
- Carroli, L. Planning roles in infrastructure system transitions: A review of research bridging socio-technical transitions and planning. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2018, 29, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cowell, R.; Owens, S. Governing space: Planning reform and the politics of sustainability. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 2006, 24, 403–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adil, A.M.; Ko, Y. Socio-technical evolution of decentralized energy systems: A critical review and implications for urban planning and policy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 57, 1025–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spatha, F.Y.; Rohracherb, H. Energy Regions’: The Transformative Power of Regional Discourses on Socio-Technical Futures; IFP—Institute of Forest and Environmental Policy, University of Freiburg: Freiburg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Davidson, K.; Arman, M. Planning for sustainability: An assessment of recent metropolitan planning strategies and urban policy in Australia. Aust. Plan. 2014, 51, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nieminen, J.; Salomaa, A.; Juhola, S. Governing urban sustainability transitions: Urban planning regime and modes of governance. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2020, 64, 559–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Bilali, H. The multi-level perspective in research on sustainability transitions in agriculture and food systems: A systematic review. Agriculture 2019, 9, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Rijnsoever, F.J.; Leendertse, J. A practical tool for analyzing socio-technical transitions. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2020, 37, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asheim, B.; Coenen, L.; Vang, J. Regional innovation systems in an era of grand societal challenges: Reorientation versus transformation. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2022, 30, 1997–2015. [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez, A.; Alvarado, H. Claves de la Innovación Social en América Latina. CEPAL. 2008. Available online: https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/2536-claves-la-innovacion-social-america-latina-caribe (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Goulet, F.; Schmitt, C.; Sabourin, E.; Le Coq, J.F.; Sotomayor, O. Sistemas y Políticas de Innovación Para el Sector Agropecuario: Elementos de Introducción; Goulet, E.F., Le Coq, J.F., Sotomayor, O., Eds.; e-Papers; Sistemas y Políticas de Innovación para el Sector Agropecuario en América Latina: Santiago de Chile, Chile, 2019; pp. 5–21. [Google Scholar]
- Ehnert, F.; Egermann, M.; Betsch, A. The role of niche and regime intermediaries in building partnerships for urban transitions towards sustainability. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2022, 24, 137–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raven, R.P.; Verbong, G.P.; Schilpzand, W.F.; Witkamp, M.J. Translation mechanisms in socio-technical niches: A case study of Dutch river management. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2011, 23, 1063–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kivimaa, P.; Boon, W.; Hyysalo, S.; Klerkx, L. Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Res. Policy 2019, 48, 1062–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, L.-B.; Newig, J. Importance of actors and agency in sustainability transitions: A systematic exploration of the literature. Sustainability 2016, 8, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zapata, O. Reflexión sobre los planes de desarrollo en Colombia. Rev. Bitácora Urbano Territ. 2020, 30, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duque, N. Los vacíos de la planeación participativa en la formulación de los planes de desarrollo local en Bogotá. Urbe-Revista Bras. De Gestao Urbana 2019, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrera, M.; Pacheco, S. Planeación participativa como una alternativa de desarrollo. Cienc. Y Agric. 2013, 10, 29–36. Available online: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=560058657005 (accessed on 10 April 2024). [CrossRef]
- Umaña Maldonado, M.; Quilindo Bolaños, D.C. La organización territorial de Colombia y la estructuración de su sistema de planeación y ordenamiento territorial. Perspect. Rural Dev. 2018, 2, 85–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acuña, I.T. La Política Ambiental en los Planes de Desarrollo en Colombia 1990–2006. Una Visión Crítica. Rev. Luna Azul 2006, 22, 8–19. Available online: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=321727224002 (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Bateman, A.; Penagos, A.; Ramirez, J.; Martin, T.; Diaz, Y.; Satizabal, S. Lineamientos Conceptuales y Metodológicos Para la Definición de una Subregionalización Funcional en Colombia; DNP-RIMISP: Bogotá, Colombia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Grosso, C. Desarrollo histórico y ámbito de acción de la planeación en Colombia. Adm. Desarro. 2009, 37, 39–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creswell, J.W. Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2003; p. 246. [Google Scholar]
- Santander Development Plan 2020–2023. “Santander Siempre Contigo y para el Mundo”. Available online: https://obsgestioneducativa.com/download/plan-de-desarrollo-departamental-santander-2020-2023/ (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Municipality of Capitanejo. Development Plan of Capitanejo 2020–2023: “Capitanejo for Everyone”. 2020. Available online: https://capitanejosantander.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/capitanejosantander/content/files/000235/11734_plan-de-desarrollo-20202023-capitanejo.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Municipality of Carcasí. Development Plan of Carcasí 2020–2023: “With Humility and Hard Work I Fight for Carcasí”. 2020. Available online: https://carcasisantander.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/carcasisantander/content/files/000486/24283_plan-de-desarrollo-carcasi-2020-lucho-por-carcasi.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Municipality of Cerrito. Development Plan of Cerrito 2020–2023: “Cerrito for Everyone Agricultural and Entrepreneurial”. 2020. Available online: https://cerritosantander.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/cerritosantander/content/files/000542/27057_pdt-cerrito-entregado.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Municipality of Concepción. Development Plan of Concepción 2020–2023: “Enciso We Are All”. 2020. Available online: https://encisosantander.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/encisosantander/content/files/000082/4073_plan-de-desarrollo-enciso-somos-todos.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Municipality of Guaca. Development Plan of Guaca 2020–2023: “With Humility to Serve the People”. 2020. Available online: https://guacasantander.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/guacasantander/content/files/000245/12229_pdt-guaca-julio-14.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Municipality of Macaravita. Development Plan of Macaravita 2020–2023: “Macaravita for Everyone Productive With Equity”. 2020. Available online: https://macaravitasantander.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/macaravitasantander/content/files/000396/19791_pdt-macaravita-20202023-aprobado.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Municipality of Málaga. Development Plan of Málaga 2020–2023: “Málaga We Are All”. 2020. Available online: https://malagasantander.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/malagasantander/content/files/000536/26769_04-pdt-diagnostico-y-lineas-estrategicas-01.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Municipality of Molagavita. Development Plan of Molagavita 2020–2023: “Molagavita for Everyone”. 2020. Available online: https://molagavitasantander.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/molagavitasantander/content/files/000214/10668_plan-desarrolo-trabajo-y-servicio-para-todos.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Municipality of San Andrés. Development Plan of San Andrés 2020–2023: “San Andrés Has a Future”. 2020. Available online: https://sanandressantander.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/sanandressantander/content/files/000610/30493_plan-de-desarrollo-definitivo-con-sancion-2020--2023.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Municipality of San José de Miranda. Development Plan of San José de Miranda 2020–2023: “Let’s Move Forward Together with Faith and Hope”. 2020. Available online: http://www.sanjosedemiranda-santander.gov.co (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- Municipality of San Miguel. Development Plan of San Miguel 2020–2023: “San Miguel for Everyone”. 2020. Available online: https://www.sanmiguel-santander.gov.co/control/informe-de-seguimiento-n-4-plan-de-desarrollo-san-miguel (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- DANE. National Agricultural Census 2014. Available online: https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/agropecuario/censo-nacional-agropecuario-2014 (accessed on 16 March 2024).
- Coronado, J.; Luna, M.; Moreno, P.; Villamizar, A. Caracterización Biofísica y Socioeconómica de la Provincia de García Rovira; Ediciones CORPOICA: Málaga, Colombia, 1995. [Google Scholar]
Level | Description |
---|---|
Landscape | National development plan, national commitments to the SDGs, incentives for cleaner production in public banking and education. |
Incumbent system | Territorial agenda and sustainable development agenda in development plans through productivity, competitiveness and SDGs |
Niche | Experimentation with variables that influence environmental production through small scale, technology, infrastructure, culture, associativity, access to capital, market and planning. |
Moment | Agency Mechanism | Actors | Potential Influence |
---|---|---|---|
Problematization | Traditional production in decline and emergence of a sustainable production niche | Non-traditional producers | Twelve municipalities in the province of García Rovira |
Interest | Production with environmental emphasis | Blackberry, strawberry, cape gooseberry, coffee and tomato producers | Farms close to niche producers |
Inscription | Green markets, innovation, small-scale production and associativity | Blackberry, strawberry, cape gooseberry, coffee and tomato producers | Expanded networks of nearby farms |
Mobilization | Planning processes in mayors and departments | Niche producers, mayors, government and National Planning Department | Planning regime |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Llanez Anaya, H.F.; Sánchez Reyes, J. Niche Sustainable Agricultural Production in Colombia: The Case of Territorial Development Agendas and Development Planning in the Province of García Rovira. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8544. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198544
Llanez Anaya HF, Sánchez Reyes J. Niche Sustainable Agricultural Production in Colombia: The Case of Territorial Development Agendas and Development Planning in the Province of García Rovira. Sustainability. 2024; 16(19):8544. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198544
Chicago/Turabian StyleLlanez Anaya, Helmer Fernando, and Jimmy Sánchez Reyes. 2024. "Niche Sustainable Agricultural Production in Colombia: The Case of Territorial Development Agendas and Development Planning in the Province of García Rovira" Sustainability 16, no. 19: 8544. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198544
APA StyleLlanez Anaya, H. F., & Sánchez Reyes, J. (2024). Niche Sustainable Agricultural Production in Colombia: The Case of Territorial Development Agendas and Development Planning in the Province of García Rovira. Sustainability, 16(19), 8544. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198544