Next Article in Journal
Biodiesel from Higher Alcohols for Removal of Crude Oil Spills from Coastal Sediments
Previous Article in Journal
Social Cost of Carbon as an International Benchmark to Drive Countries’ Carbon Pricing during the Transition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Survey of Beachgoers to Estimate Sunscreen Coastal Water Input and Potential Eco-Label Consumption: Contributions to Sustainable Tourism

by
Cristina Pallero-Flores
1,
José L. Oviedo
1,
Antonio Tovar-Sánchez
1,
Carlos Moreno
2 and
Araceli Rodríguez-Romero
1,2,*
1
Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Institute of Marine Science of Andalusia (ICMAN), C. Republica Saharaui, 4, 11519 Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
2
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Marine Research Institute (INMAR), Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Cadiz, Campus of Puerto Real, 11510 Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(19), 8575; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198575
Submission received: 31 July 2024 / Revised: 30 September 2024 / Accepted: 30 September 2024 / Published: 2 October 2024

Abstract

The rise of sun and beach tourism has led to concerns about the environmental impact of sunscreens on marine ecosystems. Although the contaminants included in sunscreens are being studied from various perspectives, there are still gaps in the understanding of beachgoers’ habits and sunscreen use, and their awareness of the problems these products can cause. But do we even know how much sunscreen ends up in the ocean when beachgoers apply it? To estimate the amount of sunscreen entering coastal waters during a summer season, a survey (n = 429) was conducted at two urban beaches in southern Spain (La Caleta and La Bajadilla). It was estimated that 76.3 to 109.3 mL of sunscreen per beachgoer enters the water during the season. For this estimation, it was crucial that we the analyze beachgoers’ behavior statistically. Additionally, our study calculated their willingness to pay (WTP) for eco-labeled sunscreen alternatives. The results showed significant differences between the two sites, with La Bajadilla reporting higher sunscreen usage (11.9 mL vs. 7.9 mL per application) and a greater WTP for eco-labeled sunscreen (€14.2 vs. €11.5). These findings highlight the need for more field studies to better understand the input of sunscreen into coastal waters, which is closely linked to beach use and its social factors. This approach, which considers specific sunscreen input and characterizes beachgoers’ habits, behaviors, and preferences for alternatives, provides valuable insights for decision-makers and may guide future research on the potential impact of sunscreens on marine ecosystems using behavioral data as well as alternative approaches to solving the problem.
Keywords: beachgoers; behavioral; environment; contingent valuation; field survey beachgoers; behavioral; environment; contingent valuation; field survey

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pallero-Flores, C.; Oviedo, J.L.; Tovar-Sánchez, A.; Moreno, C.; Rodríguez-Romero, A. A Survey of Beachgoers to Estimate Sunscreen Coastal Water Input and Potential Eco-Label Consumption: Contributions to Sustainable Tourism. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198575

AMA Style

Pallero-Flores C, Oviedo JL, Tovar-Sánchez A, Moreno C, Rodríguez-Romero A. A Survey of Beachgoers to Estimate Sunscreen Coastal Water Input and Potential Eco-Label Consumption: Contributions to Sustainable Tourism. Sustainability. 2024; 16(19):8575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198575

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pallero-Flores, Cristina, José L. Oviedo, Antonio Tovar-Sánchez, Carlos Moreno, and Araceli Rodríguez-Romero. 2024. "A Survey of Beachgoers to Estimate Sunscreen Coastal Water Input and Potential Eco-Label Consumption: Contributions to Sustainable Tourism" Sustainability 16, no. 19: 8575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198575

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop