A Blockchain-Based Digital Product Passport System Providing a Federated Learning Environment for Collaboration Between Recycling Centers and Manufacturers to Enable Recycling Automation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- How does integrating FL contribute to improving the performance of recycling automation models?
- What impact does a blockchain and FL-integrated DPP system have on fostering a circular economy?
- Proposing a blockchain-based business model utilizing the DPP platform;
- Developing an FL-based automated recycling system;
- Introducing a novel system to support recycling and the circular economy.
2. Related Work
2.1. Synthetic Data Generation
2.2. Federated Learning in Various Industries
2.3. Distributed Internet
2.3.1. Blockchain Network
2.3.2. Distributed File System
2.3.3. Blockchain Technology Application in Business
2.4. Summary and Opportunities
- Integration and Security Issues with DPPs: Current implementations of DPPs predominantly rely on simple identifiers like QR codes. This approach limits the integration and security enhancement of product data and exposes it to the risk of manipulation. Additionally, despite the regulatory requirement to implement DPPs for all products by 2030, research in this area remains insufficiently active. Current studies focus on the conceptual development of DPPs, with relatively little research on industrial application and standardization.
- Utilization and Limitations of Synthetic Data: Using synthetic data to train models holds potential for reflecting various environments. This is especially useful for generating diverse scenarios from limited real data, theoretical testing, and initial prototype development. However, relying solely on synthetic data can degrade the practicality and accuracy of models due to differences from real-world conditions. Many studies address this by combining synthetic and real data for model training. This approach enhances the model’s generalizability and performance in actual environments.
- Need for Diverse Environmental Data: Training models with data focused on a single environment can be ineffective for reflecting the complex realities of scenarios like recycling. Therefore, it is necessary to use data collected from various recycling environments to train models. This enables the model to adapt to a broader range of conditions and scenarios, providing flexibility and accuracy when applied in practice.
- Potential of Blockchain for Data Management: Blockchain technology has the potential to ensure data integrity and transparency but is not widely implemented due to high processing costs and complexity. In this paper, we aim to lighten the blockchain network by transmitting data using a distributed file system (DFS) and its hash rather than transferring raw data directly.
3. Method
3.1. Relationship Diagram of Manufacturer and Recycling Center
3.2. Pre-Trained Model
3.2.1. Synthetic Data Generation in Manufacturer
3.2.2. Pre-Trained Model for Classification Part of Recycled Product
3.3. Federated Learning
3.3.1. Client Model Trained on Real Data
3.3.2. Federated Averaging
3.4. Decentralized File System for Storing the Weights of Components in Federated Learning
4. Results
4.1. Prototype Implementation
4.2. Model Performance Results
4.3. Economic Effect of Using the Digital Product Passport Platform
4.3.1. Economic Benefits for Manufacturers
4.3.2. Economic Benefits for Recycling Centers
4.3.3. Economic Benefits for the Digital Product Passport Platform
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
DPP | Digital product passport |
FL | Federated learning |
DApp | Decentralized Application |
IPFS | InterPlanetary File System |
CID | Content identifier |
ABS | Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene |
PP | Polypropylene |
PC | Polycarbonate |
SOLO | Synthetic Optimized Labeled Objects |
COCO | Common Objects in Context |
YOLOv8 | You Only Look Once version 8 |
FedAVG | Federated averaging |
ABI | Application Binary Interface |
References
- Mesa, J.A.; Esparragoza, I.; Maury, H. Trends and perspectives of sustainable product design for open architecture products: Facing the circular economy model. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2019, 6, 377–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reslan, M.; Last, N.; Mathur, N.; Morris, K.; Ferrero, V. Circular economy: A product life cycle perspective on engineering and manufacturing practices. Procedia CIRP 2022, 105, 851–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, C.H.; Pan, J.K. A Systematic review on extended reality applications for sustainable manufacturing across the product lifecycle. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2024, 11, 1017–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Götz, T.; Berg, H.; Jansen, M.; Adisorn, T.; Cembrero, D.; Markkanen, S.; Chowdhury, T. Digital Product Passport: The Ticket to Achieving a Climate Neutral and Circular European Economy? University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership: Cambridge, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Adisorn, T.; Tholen, L.; Götz, T. Towards a digital product passport fit for contributing to a circular economy. Energies 2021, 14, 2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rumetshofer, T.; Straka, K.; Fischer, J. How the Digital Product Passport Can Lead the Plastics Industry towards a Circular Economy—A Case Study from Bottle Caps to Frisbees. Polymers 2024, 16, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walden, J.; Steinbrecher, A.; Marinkovic, M. Digital product passports as enabler of the circular economy. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2021, 93, 1717–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heeß, P.; Rockstuhl, J.; Körner, M.F.; Strüker, J. Enhancing trust in global supply chains: Conceptualizing Digital Product Passports for a low-carbon hydrogen market. Electron. Mark. 2024, 34, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hulea, M.; Miron, R.; Muresan, V. Digital Product Passport Implementation Based on Multi-Blockchain Approach with Decentralized Identifier Provider. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koppelaar, R.H.; Pamidi, S.; Hajósi, E.; Herreras, L.; Leroy, P.; Jung, H.Y.; Concheso, A.; Daniel, R.; Francisco, F.B.; Parrado, C.; et al. A digital product passport for critical raw materials reuse and recycling. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cimpan, C.; Maul, A.; Wenzel, H.; Pretz, T. Techno-economic assessment of central sorting at material recovery facilities–the case of lightweight packaging waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 4387–4397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.T.; Song, J.H.; Min, S.H.; Lee, H.S.; Song, K.Y.; Chu, C.N.; Ahn, S.H. Research trends in sustainable manufacturing: A review and future perspective based on research databases. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2019, 6, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gundupalli, S.P.; Hait, S.; Thakur, A. A review on automated sorting of source-separated municipal solid waste for recycling. Waste Manag. 2017, 60, 56–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Picon, A.; Ghita, O.; Iriondo, P.M.; Bereciartua, A.; Whelan, P.F. Automation of waste recycling using hyperspectral image analysis. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 15th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2010), Bilbao, Spain, 13–16 September 2010; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Chin, L.; Lipton, J.; Yuen, M.C.; Kramer-Bottiglio, R.; Rus, D. Automated recycling separation enabled by soft robotic material classification. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), Seoul, Republic of Korea, 14–18 April 2019; pp. 102–107. [Google Scholar]
- Reddy, Y.; Viswanath, P.; Reddy, B.E. Semi-supervised learning: A brief review. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jordon, J.; Szpruch, L.; Houssiau, F.; Bottarelli, M.; Cherubin, G.; Maple, C.; Cohen, S.N.; Weller, A. Synthetic Data—What, why and how? arXiv 2022, arXiv:2205.03257. [Google Scholar]
- Van Breugel, B.; Qian, Z.; Van Der Schaar, M. Synthetic data, real errors: How (not) to publish and use synthetic data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Honolulu, HI, USA, 23–29 July 2023; pp. 34793–34808. [Google Scholar]
- Alkhalifah, T.; Wang, H.; Ovcharenko, O. MLReal: Bridging the gap between training on synthetic data and real data applications in machine learning. Artif. Intell. Geosci. 2022, 3, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tremblay, J.; Prakash, A.; Acuna, D.; Brophy, M.; Jampani, V.; Anil, C.; To, T.; Cameracci, E.; Boochoon, S.; Birchfield, S. Training deep networks with synthetic data: Bridging the reality gap by domain randomization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–22 June 2018; pp. 969–977. [Google Scholar]
- Nowruzi, F.E.; Kapoor, P.; Kolhatkar, D.; Hassanat, F.A.; Laganiere, R.; Rebut, J. How much real data do we actually need: Analyzing object detection performance using synthetic and real data. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1907.07061. [Google Scholar]
- Mammen, P.M. Federated learning: Opportunities and challenges. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2101.05428. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, B.; Li, K. Applications of federated learning in smart cities: Recent advances, taxonomy, and open challenges. Connect. Sci. 2022, 34, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMahan, B.; Moore, E.; Ramage, D.; Hampson, S.; y Arcas, B.A. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 20–22 April 2017; pp. 1273–1282. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, X.; Huang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Saenko, K. Federated adversarial domain adaptation. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1911.02054. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Garg, S.; Lin, H.; Hu, J.; Kaddoum, G.; Piran, M.J.; Hossain, M.S. Toward accurate anomaly detection in industrial internet of things using hierarchical federated learning. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 9, 7110–7119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, Y.; Singla, R. Federated learning systems for healthcare: Perspective and recent progress. In Federated Learning Systems: Towards Next-Generation AI; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 141–156. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Huang, A.; Luo, Y.; Huang, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Feng, L.; Chen, T.; Yu, H.; Yang, Q. Fedvision: An online visual object detection platform powered by federated learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New York, NY, USA, 7–12 February 2020; Volume 34, pp. 13172–13179. [Google Scholar]
- Memia, A. Federated Learning for Edge Computing: Real-Time Object Detection. Master’s Thesis, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Qin, R.; Wang, F.Y. An overview of smart contract: Architecture, applications, and future trends. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Changshu, China, 26–30 June 2018; pp. 108–113. [Google Scholar]
- Casino, F.; Dasaklis, T.K.; Patsakis, C. A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telemat. Inform. 2019, 36, 55–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alotaibi, L.S.; Alshamrani, S.S. Smart Contract: Security and Privacy. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 2021, 38, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rawat, V.; Dahiya, N.; Rai, S.; Arora, A. A blockchain-based decentralized framework for carbon accounting, trading and governance. In Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference on Computer Technology Applications, Vienna, Austria, 12–14 May 2022; pp. 148–153. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, D.C.; Pathirana, P.N.; Ding, M.; Seneviratne, A. Blockchain for secure ehrs sharing of mobile cloud based e-health systems. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 66792–66806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aydar, M.; Ayvaz, S.; Cetin, S.C. Towards a Blockchain based digital identity verification, record attestation and record sharing system. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1906.09791. [Google Scholar]
- Alabdulwahhab, F.A. Web 3.0: The decentralized web blockchain networks and protocol innovation. In Proceedings of the 2018 1st International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,, 4–6 April 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Bharadiya, J.P. Artificial intelligence and the future of web 3.0: Opportunities and challenges ahead. Am. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2023, 6, 91–96. [Google Scholar]
- Glomann, L.; Schmid, M.; Kitajewa, N. Improving the blockchain user experience—-An approach to address blockchain mass adoption issues from a human-centred perspective. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering, Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on Human Factors in Artificial Intelligence and Social Computing, the AHFE International Conference on Human Factors, Software, Service and Systems Engineering, and the AHFE International Conference of Human Factors in Energy, Washington, DC, USA, 24–28 July 2019; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 608–616. [Google Scholar]
- Schollmeier, R. A definition of peer-to-peer networking for the classification of peer-to-peer architectures and applications. In Proceedings of the Proceedings First International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing, Linkping, Sweden, 27–29 August 2001; pp. 101–102. [Google Scholar]
- Krishnan, R.; Smith, M.D.; Telang, R. The economics of peer-to-peer networks. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. 2003, 5, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berthon, P.; Chohan, R.; Pehlivan, E.; Rabinovich, T. Corrigendum to ‘Fixing fake news: Understanding and managing the marketer-consumer information echosystem’ [Business Horizons, 65/6 (2022), pp. 729–738]. Bus. Horizons 2023, 66, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trautwein, D.; Raman, A.; Tyson, G.; Castro, I.; Scott, W.; Schubotz, M.; Gipp, B.; Psaras, Y. Design and evaluation of IPFS: A storage layer for the decentralized web. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 22–26 August 2022; pp. 739–752. [Google Scholar]
- Balduf, L.; Henningsen, S.; Florian, M.; Rust, S.; Scheuermann, B. Monitoring data requests in decentralized data storage systems: A case study of IPFS. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 42nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), Bologna, Italy, 10–13 July 2022; pp. 658–668. [Google Scholar]
- Agrawal, S.; Jain, H. An approach to develop a secure and decentralized internet. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Nascent Technologies in Engineering (ICNTE), Navi Mumbai, India, 4–5 January 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, S.; Bharti, A.K.; Amin, R. Decentralized secure storage of medical records using Blockchain and IPFS: A comparative analysis with future directions. Secur. Priv. 2021, 4, e162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Giovanni, P. Blockchain and smart contracts in supply chain management: A game theoretic model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 228, 107855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, T.M.; Ouyang, X. Initial coin offerings for blockchain based product provenance authentication platforms. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 233, 107995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harish, A.R.; Wu, W.; Li, M.; Huang, G.Q. Blockchain-enabled digital asset tokenization for crowdsensing in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2023, 185, 109664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Zheng, X.X.; Jia, F.; Liu, Z. Pricing strategy and blockchain technology investment under hybrid carbon trading schemes: A biform game analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2024, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayabalan, J.; Jeyanthi, N. Scalable blockchain model using off-chain IPFS storage for healthcare data security and privacy. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 2022, 164, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmud, M.; Sohan, M.S.H.; Reno, S.; Sikder, M.B.; Hossain, F.S. Advancements in scalability of blockchain infrastructure through IPFS and dual blockchain methodology. J. Supercomput. 2024, 80, 8383–8405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Jiang, C.; Yang, X.; Sun, S. Review of the application of acoustic emission technology in green manufacturing. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2024, 11, 995–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jocher, G.; Chaurasia, A.; Stoken, A.; Borovec, J. ultralytics/yolov8: YOLOv8. 2023. Available online: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics (accessed on 9 July 2023).
- Wang, X.; Garg, S.; Lin, H.; Piran, M.J.; Hu, J.; Hossain, M.S. Enabling secure authentication in industrial iot with transfer learning empowered blockchain. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021, 17, 7725–7733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Model | Description | Test Dataset | Precision | Recall | F1-Score | mAP50 | mAP50-95 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YOLOv8 | Initial models trained with synthetic data | Synthetic data | 0.972 | 0.938 | 0.955 | 0.986 | 0.957 |
YOLOv8 | Initial models trained with synthetic data | Real data of all environments | 0.947 | 0.938 | 0.942 | 0.962 | 0.772 |
Client ID | Model | Train Dataset | Test Dataset | Precision | Recall | F1-Score | mAP50 | mAP50-95 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Client1 | YOLOv8 model | Real data of factory environment | Real data of all environments | 0.926 | 0.98 | 0.952 | 0.965 | 0.758 |
Client2 | YOLOv8 model | Real data of polyurehane environment | Real data of all environments | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.975 | 0.974 | 0.744 |
Client3 | YOLOv8 model | Real data of wood environment | Real data of all environments | 0.924 | 0.95 | 0.937 | 0.951 | 0.699 |
Client4 | YOLOv8 model | Real data of gray environment | Real data of all environments | 0.975 | 0.96 | 0.967 | 0.968 | 0.762 |
Client5 | YOLOv8 model | Real data of rubber environment | Real data of all environments | 0.865 | 0.896 | 0.88 | 0.934 | 0.639 |
Client6 | YOLOv8 model | Real data of brown environment | Real data of all environments | 0.714 | 0.801 | 0.755 | 0.902 | 0.562 |
Model | Description | Test Dataset | Precision | Recall | F1-Score | mAP50 | mAP50-95 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FedAVG | Models of Client 1 to 6 are federated trained using FedAVG methods | Real data of all environments | 0.961 | 0.988 | 0.974 | 0.974 | 0.771 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, M.J.; Han, C.H.; Park, K.J.; Moon, J.S.; Um, J. A Blockchain-Based Digital Product Passport System Providing a Federated Learning Environment for Collaboration Between Recycling Centers and Manufacturers to Enable Recycling Automation. Sustainability 2025, 17, 2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062679
Kim MJ, Han CH, Park KJ, Moon JS, Um J. A Blockchain-Based Digital Product Passport System Providing a Federated Learning Environment for Collaboration Between Recycling Centers and Manufacturers to Enable Recycling Automation. Sustainability. 2025; 17(6):2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062679
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Min Ji, Cheol Hyeon Han, Kyung Jin Park, Ji Sung Moon, and Jumyung Um. 2025. "A Blockchain-Based Digital Product Passport System Providing a Federated Learning Environment for Collaboration Between Recycling Centers and Manufacturers to Enable Recycling Automation" Sustainability 17, no. 6: 2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062679
APA StyleKim, M. J., Han, C. H., Park, K. J., Moon, J. S., & Um, J. (2025). A Blockchain-Based Digital Product Passport System Providing a Federated Learning Environment for Collaboration Between Recycling Centers and Manufacturers to Enable Recycling Automation. Sustainability, 17(6), 2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062679