Gendered Analysis of Agro-Based Climate Adaptation in the Santchou Landscape of Cameroon
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Analytical Framework
3. Study Area and Methods
4. Results
4.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics
4.2. Farming Practices and Interventions by Both State and Non-State Actors
4.3. Gender Variations in AgroBased Adaptation
4.4. Intensity of Each of the Following Farming Adaptation Strategies
4.5. Implications for Agro-Based Climate Adaptation Planning
4.6. Strategies to Bridge Agro-Based Climate Adaptation Gaps Between Genders
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Noah, S.D.; Davenport, F.V.; Burke, M. Historical warming has increased U.S. crop insurance losses. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 084025. [Google Scholar]
- Sultan, B.; Defrance, D.; Iizumi, T. Evidence of crop production losses in West Africa due to historical global warming in two crop models. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Awazi, N.P.; Kimengsi, J.N.; Forje, G.D. Gender-differentiated capture of agro-based climate adaptation interventions: Implications for agricultural systems and practices in Cameroon’s Western highlands. SN Soc. Sci. 2024, 4, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, B.M.; Vermeulen, S.J.; Aggarwal, P.K.; Corner-Dolloff, C.; Girvetz, E.; Loboguerrero, A.M.; Ramirez-Villegas, J.; Rosenstock, T.; Sebastian, L.; Thornton, P.K. Reducing risks to food security from climate change. Glob. Food Secur. 2016, 11, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kimengsi, J.N.; Silberberger, M. How Endogenous Cultural Institutions May (Not) Shape Farmers’ Climate Adaptation Practices: Learning from Rural Cameroon. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2023, 36, 460–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, M.R.; Barros, V.R.; Broome, J.; Cramer, W.; Christ, R.; Church, J.A.; Clarke, L.; Dahe, Q.; Dasgupta, P.; Dubash, N.K.; et al. IPCC Fifth Assessment Synthesis Report-Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Ambagna, J.; Kane, G.; Oyekale, A. Subsistence Farming and Food Security in Cameroon: A Macroeconomic Approach. Life Sci. J. 2012, 9, 3949–3954. [Google Scholar]
- Calzadilla, A.; Zhu, T.; Rehdanz, K. Climate change and agriculture: Impacts and adaptation options in South Africa. Water Resour. Econ. 2014, 5, 24–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nhamo, L.; Matchaya, G.; Mabhaudhi, T. Cereal production trends under climate change impacts and adaptation strategies in Southern Africa. Agriculture 2019, 9, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emeiegwu, L.E.; Ada, W.; Alastair, H. The impacts of climate change on agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: A spatial panel data approach. World Dev. 2022, 158, 105967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abass, R.; Mensah, A.; Fosu-Mensah, B. The role of formal and informal institutions in smallholder agricultural adaptation: The case of Lawra and Nandom Districts, Ghana. West Afr. J. Appl. Ecol. 2018, 26, 56–72. [Google Scholar]
- Tume, S.J.P.; Kimengsi, J.N. Indigenous and modern agro-based climate adaptation practices in rural Cameroon. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2021, 78, 1057–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Bank. Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing, Value Added (% of GDP)—Sub-Saharan Africa. 2021. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.AGR.TOTL.ZS?locations=ZG (accessed on 17 December 2021).
- Lawson, E.T.; Alare, R.S.; Salifu, A.R.Z. Dealing with climate change in semi-arid Ghana: Understanding intersectional perceptions and adaptation strategies of women farmers. Geo J. 2020, 85, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opiyo, F.; Wasonga, O.V.; Nyangito, M.M.; Mureithi, S.M.; Obando, J.; Munang, R. Determinants of perceptions of climate change and adaptation among Turkana pastoralists in northwestern Kenya. Clim. Dev. 2016, 8, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arunrat, N.; Wang, C.; Pumijumnong, N.; Sereenonchai, S.; Cai, W. Farmers’ intention and decision to adapt to climate change: A case study in the Yom and Nan basins, Phichit province of Thailand. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 672–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phuong, L.T.H.; Biesbroek, G.R.; Sen, L.T.H.; Wals, A.E.J. Understanding smallholder farmers’ capacity to respond to climate change in a coastal community in Central Vietnam. Clim. Dev. 2017, 10, 701–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fachrista, I.A.; Irham, M.; Suryantini, A. Livelihood resilience of vegetables farmers: Efficacy of organic farming in dealing with climate change in Java, Indonesia. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 11209–11232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngo, C.C.; Poortvliet, P.M.; Feindt, P.H. Drivers of flood and climate change risk perceptions and intention to adapt: An explorative survey in coastal and delta Vietnam. J. Risk Res. 2019, 23, 424–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomez, N. Climate change and adaptation on selected crops in Southern Philippines. Int. J. Clim. Change Strat. Manag. 2015, 7, 290–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngigi, M.W.; Mueller, U.; Birner, R. Gender differences in climate change adaptation strategies and participation in group-based approaches: An intra-household analysis from Rural Kenya. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 138, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evengelista, P.; Young, N.; Burnett, J. How will climate change spatially affect agriculture production in Ethiopia? Int. J. Devoted Descr. Causes Implic. Clim. Change 2013, 119, 855–873. [Google Scholar]
- Balgah, R.A.; Kimengsi, J.N. Building an indigenous agro-pastoral framework to climate change in Sub-Saharan Africa: Experiences from North West Region of Cameroon. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2015, 29, 126–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amawa, S.G.; Kimengsi, J.N. The implications of climate on market gardening in Santa Sub-Division, North West Region of Cameroon. Environ. Nat. Resour. Res. 2015, 5, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture 2010–2011: Women in Agriculture, Closing the Gender Gap for Development, 2011th ed.; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Peterman, A.; Behrman, J.A.; Quisumbing, A.R. A review of empirical evidence on gender differences in nonland agricultural inputs, technology, and services in developing countries. In Gender in Agriculture. Closing the Knowledge Gap; Quisumbing, A.R., Dick, R.M., Raney, T.L., Croppenstedt, A., Behrman, J.A., Peterman, A., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy; Springer Science: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Ravera, F.; Martín-López, B.; Pascual, U.; Drucker, A. The diversity of gendered adaptation strategies to climate change of Indian farmers: A feminist intersectional approach. Ambio 2016, 45, 335–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaijser, A.; Kronsell, A. Climate change through the lens of intersectionality. Environ. Politics 2014, 23, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugden, F.; Maskey, N.; Clement, F.; Ramesh, V.; Philip, A.; Rai, A. Agrarian stress and climate change in the Eastern Gangetic plains: Gendered vulnerability in a stratified social formation. Glob. Environ. Change 2014, 29, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fearon, J.D. Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country. J. Econ. Growth 2023, 8, 195–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santchou Council. Santchou Council Development Plan; PNDP: Santchou, Cameroun, 2015; p. 152. [Google Scholar]
- FAO: Food and Agricultural Organization. Crop Prospects and Food Situation—Quarterly Global Report No. 1; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mckune, S.L.; Borresen, E.C.; Young, A.G.; Auria, T.D.; Russo, S.L.; Diao, A. Climate change through a gendered lens: Examining livestock holder food security. Glob. Food Secur. 2015, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mersha, A.A.; Van Laerhoven, F.A. Gender approach to understanding the differentiated impact of barriers to adaptation: Responses to climate change in rural Ethiopia. Reg. Environ. Change 2016, 16, 1701–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stål, H.I.; Bonnedahl, K.J. Provision of climate advice as a mechanism for environmental governance in Swedish agriculture. Environ. Policy Gov. 2015, 25, 356–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Communities | Households Sampled | % Sampled | Sampling Fraction % |
---|---|---|---|
Santchou Ville | 30 | 18.9 | 6 |
Madagascar | 53 | 33.3 | 8 |
Bessouck | 29 | 18.2 | 5 |
Behind Albatros | 8 | 5.0 | 5 |
Kasala Farm | 39 | 24.5 | 6 |
Variable | Categories | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Santchou Community | Ville | 18.9 |
Madagascar | 33.3 | |
Bessouck | 18.2 | |
Behind Albatros | 5.0 | |
Kasala Farm | 24.5 | |
Female | 24.5 | |
Level of Education | No formal | 6.9 |
Primary | 22.6 | |
Secondary | 49.1 | |
Vocational | 15.1 | |
BSc and above | 6.3 | |
Main Occupation | Farmer | 52.2 |
Bike/Taxi Rider | 8.2 | |
Petty Trader | 10.7 | |
Salary State | 11.9 | |
Salary Private | 6.3 | |
NGO | 0.6 | |
Builder | 0.6 | |
Sand Miner | 1.9 | |
Others | 7.5 |
State | NGOs | Household | Men | Women | Natives | Migrants | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monocropping | 22% | 21.4% | 00 | 6.9% | 1.9% | 7.5% | 7.5% |
Mixed cropping | 00 | 3.8% | 5.7% | 3.8% | 6.9% | 6.9% | 6.9% |
Mixed farming | 32.1% | 17.0% | 8.8% | 48.4% | 61% | 61% | 61% |
Agroforestry system | 10.1% | 15.7% | 61.6% | 8.8% | 3.1% | 4.4% | 4.4% |
Market gardening | 2.5% | 1.3% | 5% | 1.3% | 8.2% | 3.8% | 3.8% |
Cash crop farming | 25.8% | 11.9% | 8.2% | 17.0% | 7.5% | 6.9% | 6.9% |
Apiculture | 0.6% | 1.9% | 2.5% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 2.5% | 2.5% |
Snail farming | 00 | 3.8% | 00 | 1.9% | 1.9% | 0.6% | 0.6% |
Add perennial crops | 6.9% | 23.3% | 8.2% | 10.1% | 7.5% | 6.3% | 6.3% |
Strategy | Male | Female |
---|---|---|
Change of planting season/periods, dates | 0.6 | 99.4% |
Introduce drought-tolerant varieties | 1.3 | 98.7% |
Crop rotation | 3.1 | 96.9% |
Land oration | 10.9 | 89.9% |
Intercropping | 88.4 | 11.4 |
Repeated sowing | 3.8 | 96.2% |
Zero tillage | 9.4 | 90.6% |
Cover cropping | 4.4 | 95.6% |
Mulching | 8.2% | 88.7% |
Organic farming | 3.1 | 96.9% |
Green manuring | 6.9 | 93.1% |
Irrigation | 3.8 | 96.2% |
Not Intense | Less Intense | Moderately Intense | Intense | Very Intense | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change planting season/dates | 5% | 8.2% | 35.8% | 11.9% | 39% |
Introduction of drought-tolerant varieties | 6.9% | 21.4% | 47.2% | 22.6% | 1.9% |
Crop rotation | 4.4% | 9.4% | 35.8% | 19.5% | 30.8% |
Land oration | 3.8% | 20.1% | 49.1% | 15.1% | 11.9% |
Intercropping | 3.8% | 17% | 32.7% | 16.3% | 30.2% |
Repeated sowing | 1.9% | 12.6% | 36.5% | 22% | 27% |
Zero tillage | 4.4% | 25.2% | 45.9% | 16.3% | 8.2% |
Cover cropping | 8.8% | 19.4% | 34% | 20.8% | 17% |
Mulching | 6.3% | 24.5% | 42.2% | 15.7% | 11.3% |
Organic farming | 6.3% | 23.3% | 35.2% | 19.5% | 15.7% |
Green manuring | 5% | 27% | 44% | 12.7% | 11.3% |
Irrigation | 13.2% | 23.3% | 42.8% | 10.7% | 10% |
Strategy | Category | Response (%) |
---|---|---|
Access to land | Abolition of cultural restrictions | 63.5 |
Land redistribution | 18.2 | |
Ensured equal rights of land inheritance | 17.6 | |
Others | 0.6 | |
Access to farm inputs | Equal opportunities for assistance | 69.2 |
Subventions to female farmers | 13.8 | |
Subsidized input cost | 17.0 | |
Access to agricultural training | Sensitization of women on the importance of training | 98.7 |
Others | 1.3 | |
Access to new technologies | Capacity building on the adaptation of new technology | 73.6 |
Promotion of gender balance | 13.2 | |
Peasant-friendly technological innovations | 13.2 | |
Access to financial capital | Promotion of farmers | 75.5 |
Provision of interest-free/low-interest loans to farmers | 13.8 | |
Preferential treatment of women when it comes to loan conditions | 10.7 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ngong, T.H.; Yenlajai, B.J.; Azibo, N.K.; Alusoh, C.N.; Kimengsi, J.N. Gendered Analysis of Agro-Based Climate Adaptation in the Santchou Landscape of Cameroon. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093772
Ngong TH, Yenlajai BJ, Azibo NK, Alusoh CN, Kimengsi JN. Gendered Analysis of Agro-Based Climate Adaptation in the Santchou Landscape of Cameroon. Sustainability. 2025; 17(9):3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093772
Chicago/Turabian StyleNgong, Tosam Hycinth, Banseka JaneFrances Yenlajai, Ngwa Kester Azibo, Constantine Nwune Alusoh, and Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi. 2025. "Gendered Analysis of Agro-Based Climate Adaptation in the Santchou Landscape of Cameroon" Sustainability 17, no. 9: 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093772
APA StyleNgong, T. H., Yenlajai, B. J., Azibo, N. K., Alusoh, C. N., & Kimengsi, J. N. (2025). Gendered Analysis of Agro-Based Climate Adaptation in the Santchou Landscape of Cameroon. Sustainability, 17(9), 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093772