External Resource Dependence and Implementation Efficiency of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): A Hybrid Design Based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Dynamic Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. ESD and ESD Implementation Efficiency
2.2. Related Applications of RDT
3. Research Design
3.1. Research Framework
3.2. Variable Description: Condition Variables
3.3. Variable Description: Outcome Variable (ESD Implementation Efficiency)
Policy Text | Reference Content | Dimensions of Input Required for ESD Development |
---|---|---|
Education at a Glance 2022: OECD Indicators [48] | “There exists a statistically significant association between educational resource inputs—including fiscal funding allocations, human capital investments, and infrastructure development—and systemic educational outputs.” | human resources, financial resources |
The Education 2030 Framework for Action [49] | “It requires relevant teaching and learning methods and content that meet the needs of all learners, taught by well-qualified, trained, adequately remunerated and motivated teachers, using appropriate pedagogical approaches.” “We therefore are determined to increase public spending on education in accordance with country context, and urge adherence to the international and regional benchmarks of allocating efficiently at least 4–6% of Gross Domestic Product and/or at least 15–20% of total public expenditure to education.” “Every learning environment should be accessible to all and have adequate resources and infrastructure to ensure reasonable class sizes and provide sanitation facilities.” | human resources, financial resources, material resources |
China’s Education Modernization by 2035 [50] | “Open educational resources and conducive learning environments are pivotal in fostering a lifelong learning society, as they democratize knowledge access and sustain intellectual engagement across age groups.” “It is imperative to establish a standardized system centered on faculty allocation, per-student funding, and teaching facility optimization, aligned with talent development objectives.” | human resources, financial resources, material resources |
Education for sustainable development in action: learning & training tools [51] | “Hiring more teachers and strengthening teacher training can contribute to sustainable development.” “ESD is inseparable from interdisciplinary cooperation, and new teaching technologies (distance learning, etc.) can support its development, and governments and educational institutions can purchase relevant equipment” | human resources, material resources |
4. Methodology
4.1. The DEA Approach
Data Selection and Analysis Procedure
4.2. Dynamic QCA Method
4.2.1. Data Preparation
4.2.2. Calibration
5. Results
5.1. Super-Efficiency SBM-DEA Results
5.2. Necessity Analysis of Individual Conditions
5.3. Configuration Analysis
5.4. Results and Discussion
5.4.1. Pooled Results
5.4.2. Between-Group Results
5.4.3. Within-Group Results
5.5. The Robustness Test
6. Conclusions
6.1. Theoretical Contribution
6.2. Implications
6.3. Research Limitations and Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Leal Filho, W.; Azeiteiro, U.; Alves, F.; Pace, P.; Mifsud, M.; Brandli, L.; Caeiro, S.S.; Disterheft, A. Reinvigorating the Sustainable Development Research Agenda: The Role of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2018, 25, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kioupi, V.; Voulvoulis, N. Education for Sustainable Development: A Systemic Framework for Connecting the SDGs to Educational Outcomes. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buckler, C.; Creech, H. Shaping the Future We Want: UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development; Final Report; Unesco: Paris, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Salvia, A.L.; Leal Filho, W.; Brandli, L.L.; Griebeler, J.S. Assessing Research Trends Related to Sustainable Development Goals: Local and Global Issues. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 841–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.; Wang, C.; Quan, Y.; Wu, G.; Zhao, J. Urban Sustainable Development Efficiency towards the Balance between Nature and Human Well-Being: Connotation, Measurement, and Assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 178, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopnina, H.; Meijers, F. Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): Exploring Theoretical and Practical Challenges. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2014, 15, 188–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO. Unpacking Sustainable Development Goal 4: Education 2030; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Saini, M.; Sengupta, E.; Singh, M.; Singh, H.; Singh, J. Sustainable Development Goal for Quality Education (SDG 4): A Study on SDG 4 to Extract the Pattern of Association among the Indicators of SDG 4 Employing a Genetic Algorithm. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023, 28, 2031–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopnina, H. Education for the Future? Critical Evaluation of Education for Sustainable Development Goals. J. Environ. Educ. 2020, 51, 280–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokski, E.; Leal Filho, W.; Sehnem, S.; Andrade Guerra, J.B.S.O. de Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions: An Approach for Effective Interdisciplinarity. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2022, 24, 96–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koçak, D.; Türe, H.; Atan, M. Efficiency Measurement with Network DEA: An Application to Sustainable Development Goals 4. Int. J. Assess. Tools Educ. 2019, 6, 415–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Zhou, H. Enhancing the Efficiency of Massive Online Learning by Integrating Intelligent Analysis into MOOCs with an Application to Education of Sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiabrishvili, M.; El-Kanj, N.; Tvaliashvili, A.; Chiabrishvili, K. Sustainable economic education—Important factor for the sustainable economic development. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2019), Seville, Spain, 11–13 November 2019; Chova, L., Martinez, A., Torres, I., Eds.; 2019; pp. 2930–2935. [Google Scholar]
- Hillman, A.J.; Withers, M.C.; Collins, B.J. Resource Dependence Theory: A Review. J. Manag. 2009, 35, 1404–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrión-Martínez, J.J.; Luque-de la Rosa, A.; Fernandez-Cerero, J.; Montenegro-Rueda, M. Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) in Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliographic Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCain, T.; Jukes, I. Windows on the Future: Education in the Age of Technology; Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Assar, S. Information and Communications Technology and Education. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 66–71. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, T.; Shaikh, Z.A.; Yumashev, A.V.; Chłąd, M. Applied Model of E-Learning in the Framework of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Wang, J.; Li, G. Higher Education for Sustainable Development in China: Policies, Curriculum, Research, and Outreach Activities, and Campus Practices. In Engagement with Sustainable Development in Higher Education: Universities as Transformative Spaces for Sustainable Futures; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 121–132. [Google Scholar]
- Kozlova, D.; Pikhart, M. The Use of ICT in Higher Education from the Perspective of the University Students. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 192, 2309–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosu, R. The Role and Use of ICT in Administrative Activities in Higher Education Institutions: The Views of Administrators in Higher Educational Institutions in Ghana. Int. J. Innov. Res. Dev. 2019, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdoğan, S.; Çakar, N.D.; Ulucak, R.; Danish; Kassouri, Y. The Role of Natural Resources Abundance and Dependence in Achieving Environmental Sustainability: Evidence from Resource-Based Economies. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 29, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Little, A.W.; Green, A. Successful Globalisation, Education and Sustainable Development. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2009, 29, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chankseliani, M.; Qoraboyev, I.; Gimranova, D. Higher Education Contributing to Local, National, and Global Development: New Empirical and Conceptual Insights. High Educ. 2021, 81, 109–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Redman, A.; Wiek, A.; Barth, M. Current Practice of Assessing Students’ Sustainability Competencies: A Review of Tools. Sustain. Sci. 2021, 16, 117–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinakou, E.; Boeve-de Pauw, J.; Van Petegem, P. Exploring the Concept of Sustainable Development within Education for Sustainable Development: Implications for ESD Research and Practice. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2019, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almulla, M.A.; Al-Rahmi, W.M. Integrated Social Cognitive Theory with Learning Input Factors: The Effects of Problem-Solving Skills and Critical Thinking Skills on Learning Performance Sustainability. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orlovic Lovren, V.; Maruna, M.; Stanarevic, S. Reflections on the Learning Objectives for Sustainable Development in the Higher Education Curricula–Three Cases from the University of Belgrade. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2020, 21, 315–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rieckmann, M.; Bormann, I. Higher Education Institutions and Sustainable Development; MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drees, J.M.; Heugens, P.P.M.A.R. Synthesizing and Extending Resource Dependence Theory: A Meta-Analysis. J. Manag. 2013, 39, 1666–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, H.; Ge, L. Carbon Emissions Reduction Effects of Sustainable Development Policy in Resource-Based Cities from the Perspective of Resource Dependence: Theory and Chinese Experience. Resour. Policy 2022, 78, 102799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deslatte, A.; Stokan, E. Hierarchies of Need in Sustainable Development: A Resource Dependence Approach for Local Governance. Urban Aff. Rev. 2019, 55, 1125–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rihoux, B.; Ragin, C.C. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009; Volume 51. [Google Scholar]
- Lv, K.; Yu, A.; Gong, S.; Wu, M.; Xu, X. Impacts of Educational Factors on Economic Growth in Regions of China: A Spatial Econometric Approach. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2017, 23, 827–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Psacharopoulos, G.; Patrinos*, H.A. Returns to Investment in Education: A Further Update. Educ. Econ. 2004, 12, 111–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, C.L. The Effect of Education Spending on Student Achievement. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, New Orleans, LA, USA, 15–17 November 2018; Volume 111, pp. 1–121. [Google Scholar]
- Walker, W.; Hughes, M.; Farquhar, R. Advancing Education: School Leadership in Action; Routledge: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Glomm, G.; Kaganovich, M. Social Security, Public Education and the Growth–Inequality Relationship. Eur. Econ. Rev. 2008, 52, 1009–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, J.B.; Li, Y. Social Security Reform with Heterogeneous Mortality. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 2023, 48, 320–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acosta Castellanos, P.M.; Queiruga-Dios, A. From Environmental Education to Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2022, 23, 622–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musolin, M.H.; Serour, R.O.H.; Siregar, M.; Hamid, S.A.; Ismail, A.; Huda, M.; Rohim, M.A. Developing Personalised Islamic Learning in Digital Age: Pedagogical and Technological Integration for Open Learning Resources (OLR). In Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, London, UK, 19–22 February 2024; Yang, X.-S., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 11–25. [Google Scholar]
- Bilgen, S.; Sarıkaya, İ. Exergy for Environment, Ecology and Sustainable Development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 1115–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isar, Y.R. ‘Culture’, ‘Sustainable Development’ and Cultural Policy: A Contrarian View. In Cultural Policies for Sustainable Development; Routledge: London, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-1-351-02550-8. [Google Scholar]
- Nocca, F. The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labadi, S.; Giliberto, F.; Rosetti, I.; Shetabi, L.; Yildirim, E. Heritage and the Sustainable Development Goals: Policy Guidance for Heritage and Development Actors; ICOMOS: Charenton-le-Pont, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Murti, R.C. Culturally Responsive Teaching to Support Meaningfull Learning in Mathematics Primary School. J. Prima Edukasia 2023, 11, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Findler, F.; Schönherr, N.; Lozano, R.; Reider, D.; Martinuzzi, A. The Impacts of Higher Education Institutions on Sustainable Development: A Review and Conceptualization. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2019, 20, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD Indicators. Education at a Glance 2022: OECD Indicators; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2022; Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/education-at-a-glance-2022_3197152b-en.html (accessed on 4 April 2025).
- Available online: https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/education-2030-incheon-framework-for-action-implementation-of-sdg4-2016-en_2.pdf (accessed on 4 April 2025).
- China Unveils Blueprint for Building Strong Education System by 2035. Available online: https://english.www.gov.cn/policies/latestreleases/202501/20/content_WS678d85c6c6d0868f4e8eef83.html (accessed on 14 April 2025).
- Education for Sustainable Development Toolkit—UNESCO Digital Library. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000152453 (accessed on 14 April 2025).
- Cardoso, I.G.; Lacerda, D.P.; Piran, F.S. A DEA Model to Assess the Educational System in Brazil. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2021, 15, 245–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, B.L.; Johnes, J. Using Network DEA to Inform Policy: The Case of the Teaching Quality of Higher Education in England. High. Educ. Q. 2022, 76, 399–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazarko, J.; Šaparauskas, J. Application of DEA Method in Efficiency Evaluation of Public Higher Education Institutions. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2014, 20, 25–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Partey, P.A.; Annim, S.K.; Yidana, M.B.; Sebu, J. Estimating the Extent of Educational Resource Deprivation among Basic Schools and Its Effect on Quality Education in Ghana. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2024, 109, 103077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajani, I.R.; Akinyele, O.B. Effects of Student-Teacher Ratio on Academic Achievement of Selected Secondary School Students in Port Harcourt Metropolis, Nigeria. J. Educ. Pract. 2014, 5, 100–106. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, W.W.; Seiford, L.M.; Zhu, J. Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2011; ISBN 978-1-4419-6151-8. [Google Scholar]
- Tone, K. A Slacks-Based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2001, 130, 498–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro, R.G.; Ariño, M.A. A General Approach to Panel Data Set-Theoretic Research. JAMSIS 2016, 2, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, B.Y.; Li, K. The Quality Rating System of Chinese Preschool Education: Prospects and Challenges. Child. Educ. 2012, 88, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Bureau of Statistics of China >> Yearbook. Available online: https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/Statisticaldata/yearbook/ (accessed on 14 April 2025).
- Ke, X.; Yu, W. The Mechanism Research on the Development of Higher Education Impact on the Economic Growth. Proc. Soc. Sci. Educ. 2013, 10, 157. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, N.; Zheng, B. Natural Resources, Education, and Green Economic Development. Resour. Policy 2023, 86, 104053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Ma, L.; Ruman, A.M.; Iqbal, N.; Strielkowski, W. Impact of Natural Resource Mining on Sustainable Economic Development: The Role of Education and Green Innovation in China. Geosci. Front. 2024, 15, 101703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasudevan, H.; Moya, D.R.R.C.; Nagarathanam, R.; Newaz, F.T. Green Training and Pro-Environmental Behaviour Enhancing Education Sustainable Development Goal at Higher Education Institutions: Conceptual Approach. Int. J. Indian Cult. Bus. Manag. 2024, 31, 322–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Andrade Silva, A.R.; Outeiro, A.D.S.; Arantes Fazenda, I.C. Education & Innovation: A Path to Sustainable Development. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Innovation and Management, Kitakyushu, Japan, 30 November–2 December 2011; pp. 98–103. [Google Scholar]
- Wiktor-Mach, D. What Role for Culture in the Age of Sustainable Development? UNESCO’s Advocacy in the 2030 Agenda Negotiations. Int. J. Cult. Policy 2020, 26, 312–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benito, B.; Guillamon, M.-D.; Rios, A.-M.; Cifuentes-Faura, J. The Relationship between Culture and Sustainable Development Goal Compliance at the Municipal Level. Sustain. Dev. 2024, 33, 333–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franca Uyetaqui, N.S.; Martins Sato, B.E.; de Lima, G.M.; Esteves dos Santos, K.E. The right to sustainable education from the ybyram startup case study: Gamified sustainable education. Humanidades Inov. 2021, 8, 33–45. [Google Scholar]
- Hrebeniuk, A.; Okseniuk, I. “Digital turn” in education in the context of society’s sustainable development. Inf. Technol. Learn. Tools 2024, 100, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borma, A. The Covid-19 Pandemic. Controversies And Measures Proposed To Reduce The Impact Of Future Pandemics. Oradea J. Bus. Econ. 2023, 8, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyashanu, M.; Mtambo, C.; Karonga, T.; Walker, J. Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Learning among Higher Education Students on the Copperbelt Province, Zambia. Cogent Educ. 2023, 10, 2200631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanz-Labrador, I.; Cuerdo-Mir, M.; Doncel-Pedrera, L.M. The Use of Digital Educational Resources in Times of COVID-19. Soc. Media + Soc. 2021, 7, 20563051211049246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loo, B.P.; Wang, B. Progress of E-Development in China since 1998. Telecommun. Policy 2017, 41, 731–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fong, M.W. Digital Divide between Urban and Rural Regions in China. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 2009, 36, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ITU. Measuring the Information Society Report 2016; ITU: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, H. Study on Agriculture Circular Economy and Sustainable Development in West China. In Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Strategy in the Era of Internet; Xiaowen, J., Erming, X., Woodside, A., Eds.; Sichuan University: Chengdu, China, 2016; pp. 148–152. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Qin, W.; Qi, F.; Zhang, S. Regional Differences in China’s Ecological Civilization Construction from an Evolutionary Perspective and the Influencing Factors. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2024, 31, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragin, C.C. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies; Univ of California Press: Auckland City, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Fiss, P.C. Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. AMJ 2011, 54, 393–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, W.; Luo, G. Perceptions of Social Responsibility, Resource Integration Ability and Sustainable Development of Family Grain Farms—Evidence from China. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2024, 33, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricard, M.; Zachariou, A.; Burgos, D. Digital Education, Information and Communication Technology, and Education for Sustainable Development. In Radical Solutions and eLearning: Practical Innovations and Online Educational Technology; Burgos, D., Ed.; Lecture Notes in Educational Technology; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 27–39. ISBN 978-981-15-4952-6. [Google Scholar]
Primary Indicators | Secondary Indicators | Dimensions | Data Sources |
---|---|---|---|
Teacher–student ratio (%) | senior high school education | Input (human resources) | China Educational Finance Statistical Yearbook, Educational Statistics Yearbook of China [61] |
secondary vocational school | |||
junior high school education | |||
primary school education | |||
The proportion of full-time teachers with academic qualifications which is higher than the required one (%) | senior high school education | ||
secondary vocational school | |||
junior high school education | |||
primary school education | |||
preschool education | |||
Per student public budget education expenses (yuan/per student) | HEIs (undergraduate) | Input (financial resources) | |
secondary vocational school | |||
senior high school education | |||
junior high school education | |||
primary school education | |||
preschool education | |||
Proportion of public budget education expenses to public budget expenditures (%) | no secondary indicators | ||
Amount of teaching equipment per student (yuan/per student) | HEIs (undergraduate) | Input (material resources) | |
senior high school education | |||
secondary vocational school | |||
junior high school education | |||
primary school education | |||
Number of books per student | HEIs (undergraduate) | ||
senior high school education | |||
secondary vocational school | |||
junior high school education | |||
primary school education | |||
preschool education | |||
special education | |||
The population with education above high school | no secondary indicators | Output (expected output) | China Statistical Yearbook [61] |
The absolute value of difference in educational attainment ratio between the sexes | Output (undesirable output) | ||
The illiteracy rate of population over aged 15 |
Condition Variables | Indicators | Weights | Data Sources |
---|---|---|---|
EDL | Per capita GDP (trillion yuan) | 0.30 | China Statistical Yearbook [61] |
Proportion of the urban population (%) | 0.07 | ||
Per capita disposable income (yuan) | 0.24 | ||
Consumer price index | 0.08 | ||
total retail sales of consumer goods (trillion yuan) | 0.32 | ||
SWR | Number of health technicians per thousand population | 0.23 | |
Number of persons receiving lowest cost of living (%) | 0.56 | ||
Proportion of residents insured by basic medical insurance (%) | 0.16 | ||
Proportion of residents participating in basic old-age insurance (%) | 0.05 | ||
STIR | R&D personnel full-time equivalent | 0.33 | |
Number of patents granted in China | 0.31 | ||
Amount of technology market transaction (trillion yuan) | 0.36 | ||
EHS | Proportion of general industrial solid wastes utilized (%) | 0.14 | |
afforestation area (hectare) | 0.42 | ||
Capacity for harmless treatment of household waste (ton/day) | 0.44 | ||
CUR | Per capita public library collection | 0.07 | |
Number of terminals in the digital reading room | 0.03 | ||
Number of museum collections | 0.09 | ||
Art performance group shows (ten thousand plays) | 0.81 | ||
HIR | Per capita number of digital terminals | 0.67 | |
The proportion of network multimedia classrooms in total classrooms (%) | 0.33 |
Variables | Calibration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Full Affiliated | Crossover | Full Unaffiliated | ||
Outcome variable (Y) | ESD implementation efficiency | 1.137 | 0.623 | 0.384 |
Condition variables | EDL | 47,371.119 | 17,698.136 | 6893.046 |
SWR | 22.336 | 19.382 | 16.446 | |
STIR | 297,921.568 | 37,870.615 | 1685.539 | |
EHS | 250,139.626 | 84,645.378 | 11,252.214 | |
CUR | 384,786.470 | 73,107.057 | 7323.883 | |
HIR | 0.884 | 0.577 | 0.415 |
Year | Province | Efficiency | Year | Province | Efficiency | Year | Province | Efficiency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | Anhui | 0.4338 | 2019 | Heilongjiang | 0.8338 | 2021 | Shandong | 0.5188 |
2018 | Anhui | 0.4882 | 2020 | Heilongjiang | 0.8775 | 2022 | Shandong | 0.5494 |
2019 | Anhui | 0.4684 | 2021 | Heilongjiang | 0.8158 | 2017 | Shanxi | 1.0696 |
2020 | Anhui | 0.4763 | 2022 | Heilongjiang | 0.8819 | 2018 | Shanxi | 1.0572 |
2021 | Anhui | 0.5308 | 2017 | Hubei | 0.6389 | 2019 | Shanxi | 1.0516 |
2022 | Anhui | 0.5283 | 2018 | Hubei | 1.0124 | 2020 | Shanxi | 1.0816 |
2017 | Beijing | 1.2018 | 2019 | Hubei | 1.0074 | 2021 | Shanxi | 1.0526 |
2018 | Beijing | 1.3164 | 2020 | Hubei | 1.0014 | 2022 | Shanxi | 1.0518 |
2019 | Beijing | 1.2940 | 2021 | Hubei | 0.6666 | 2017 | Shaanxi | 0.6051 |
2020 | Beijing | 1.2782 | 2022 | Hubei | 0.6400 | 2018 | Shaanxi | 0.6420 |
2021 | Beijing | 1.2519 | 2017 | Hunan | 1.0370 | 2019 | Shaanxi | 0.6146 |
2022 | Beijing | 1.2329 | 2018 | Hunan | 1.0131 | 2020 | Shaanxi | 0.5417 |
2017 | Fujian | 0.5078 | 2019 | Hunan | 1.0353 | 2021 | Shaanxi | 0.6219 |
2018 | Fujian | 0.4454 | 2020 | Hunan | 1.0019 | 2022 | Shaanxi | 0.6663 |
2019 | Fujian | 0.4070 | 2021 | Hunan | 1.0269 | 2017 | Shanghai | 1.0699 |
2020 | Fujian | 0.4774 | 2022 | Hunan | 1.0148 | 2018 | Shanghai | 1.0600 |
2021 | Fujian | 0.5085 | 2017 | Jilin | 0.6058 | 2019 | Shanghai | 1.0323 |
2022 | Fujian | 0.5163 | 2018 | Jilin | 0.7137 | 2020 | Shanghai | 1.0644 |
2017 | Gansu | 0.5753 | 2019 | Jilin | 0.7679 | 2021 | Shanghai | 1.0685 |
2018 | Gansu | 0.5068 | 2020 | Jilin | 1.0496 | 2022 | Shanghai | 1.0561 |
2019 | Gansu | 0.5229 | 2021 | Jilin | 0.8087 | 2017 | Sichuan | 0.4912 |
2020 | Gansu | 0.5221 | 2022 | Jilin | 1.0150 | 2018 | Sichuan | 0.5986 |
2021 | Gansu | 0.5455 | 2017 | Jiangsu | 0.5085 | 2019 | Sichuan | 0.7487 |
2022 | Gansu | 0.5208 | 2018 | Jiangsu | 0.4996 | 2020 | Sichuan | 0.5363 |
2017 | Guangdong | 0.6681 | 2019 | Jiangsu | 0.5592 | 2021 | Sichuan | 0.5584 |
2018 | Guangdong | 0.5830 | 2020 | Jiangsu | 0.5560 | 2022 | Sichuan | 0.5646 |
2019 | Guangdong | 0.4877 | 2021 | Jiangsu | 0.5711 | 2017 | Tianjin | 1.1320 |
2020 | Guangdong | 0.5942 | 2022 | Jiangsu | 0.6263 | 2018 | Tianjin | 1.1134 |
2021 | Guangdong | 0.6205 | 2017 | Jiangxi | 0.5006 | 2019 | Tianjin | 1.0869 |
2022 | Guangdong | 0.6410 | 2018 | Jiangxi | 0.5221 | 2020 | Tianjin | 1.0427 |
2017 | Guangxi | 0.4697 | 2019 | Jiangxi | 0.6010 | 2021 | Tianjin | 1.0511 |
2018 | Guangxi | 0.4783 | 2020 | Jiangxi | 0.5181 | 2022 | Tianjin | 1.0452 |
2019 | Guangxi | 0.5634 | 2021 | Jiangxi | 0.6062 | 2017 | Tibet | 0.2053 |
2020 | Guangxi | 0.5436 | 2022 | Jiangxi | 0.6212 | 2018 | Tibet | 0.2412 |
2021 | Guangxi | 0.5554 | 2017 | Liaoning | 1.1393 | 2019 | Tibet | 0.3227 |
2022 | Guangxi | 0.6411 | 2018 | Liaoning | 1.1038 | 2020 | Tibet | 0.3015 |
2017 | Guizhou | 0.4115 | 2019 | Liaoning | 1.0934 | 2021 | Tibet | 0.2872 |
2018 | Guizhou | 0.3780 | 2020 | Liaoning | 1.0666 | 2022 | Tibet | 0.3163 |
2019 | Guizhou | 0.3512 | 2021 | Liaoning | 1.2055 | 2017 | Xinjiang | 1.0742 |
2020 | Guizhou | 0.4093 | 2022 | Liaoning | 1.1188 | 2018 | Xinjiang | 1.2365 |
2021 | Guizhou | 0.4847 | 2017 | Inner Mongolia | 1.0466 | 2019 | Xinjiang | 1.1103 |
2022 | Guizhou | 0.4499 | 2018 | Inner Mongolia | 1.0133 | 2020 | Xinjiang | 1.0107 |
2017 | Hainan | 0.5236 | 2019 | Inner Mongolia | 1.0337 | 2021 | Xinjiang | 1.0164 |
2018 | Hainan | 0.7104 | 2020 | Inner Mongolia | 0.6519 | 2022 | Xinjiang | 1.0148 |
2019 | Hainan | 0.6648 | 2021 | Inner Mongolia | 1.0119 | 2017 | Yunnan | 0.4268 |
2020 | Hainan | 0.5006 | 2022 | Inner Mongolia | 1.0175 | 2018 | Yunnan | 0.4283 |
2021 | Hainan | 0.5252 | 2017 | Ningxia | 0.6745 | 2019 | Yunnan | 0.6007 |
2022 | Hainan | 0.5660 | 2018 | Ningxia | 0.5622 | 2020 | Yunnan | 0.4661 |
2017 | Hebei | 0.6247 | 2019 | Ningxia | 0.5538 | 2021 | Yunnan | 0.5268 |
2018 | Hebei | 1.0215 | 2020 | Ningxia | 0.5820 | 2022 | Yunnan | 0.5056 |
2019 | Hebei | 0.6292 | 2021 | Ningxia | 0.5396 | 2017 | Zhejiang | 0.3774 |
2020 | Hebei | 1.0060 | 2022 | Ningxia | 0.5575 | 2018 | Zhejiang | 0.4327 |
2021 | Hebei | 1.0851 | 2017 | Qinghai | 0.3645 | 2019 | Zhejiang | 0.4912 |
2022 | Hebei | 1.1420 | 2018 | Qinghai | 0.4069 | 2020 | Zhejiang | 0.4653 |
2017 | Henan | 1.0150 | 2019 | Qinghai | 0.4015 | 2021 | Zhejiang | 0.4558 |
2018 | Henan | 0.6592 | 2020 | Qinghai | 0.4337 | 2022 | Zhejiang | 0.4830 |
2019 | Henan | 1.0074 | 2021 | Qinghai | 0.4358 | 2017 | Chongqing | 0.6828 |
2020 | Henan | 1.0338 | 2022 | Qinghai | 0.4851 | 2018 | Chongqing | 0.8036 |
2021 | Henan | 1.0390 | 2017 | Shandong | 0.5427 | 2019 | Chongqing | 1.0065 |
2022 | Henan | 1.0560 | 2018 | Shandong | 0.5197 | 2020 | Chongqing | 0.7441 |
2017 | Heilongjiang | 0.6511 | 2019 | Shandong | 0.5132 | 2021 | Chongqing | 1.0238 |
2018 | Heilongjiang | 0.7601 | 2020 | Shandong | 0.5170 | 2022 | Chongqing | 1.0174 |
Condition Variables | Y | ~Y | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pooled Consistency | Pooled Coverage | BECONS Distance | WICONS Distance | Pooled Consistency | Pooled Coverage | BECONS Distance | WICONS Distance | |
EDL | 0.620 | 0.681 | 0.033 | 0.077 | 0.580 | 0.586 | 0.046 | 0.085 |
~EDL | 0.623 | 0.617 | 0.034 | 0.079 | 0.685 | 0.624 | 0.025 | 0.073 |
SWR | 0.624 | 0.638 | 0.084 | 0.069 | 0.639 | 0.601 | 0.073 | 0.070 |
~SWR | 0.609 | 0.647 | 0.095 | 0.070 | 0.615 | 0.601 | 0.072 | 0.071 |
STIR | 0.524 | 0.676 | 0.038 | 0.091 | 0.532 | 0.632 | 0.036 | 0.097 |
~STIR | 0.715 | 0.624 | 0.029 | 0.063 | 0.727 | 0.584 | 0.016 | 0.067 |
EHS | 0.593 | 0.669 | 0.045 | 0.078 | 0.602 | 0.626 | 0.057 | 0.071 |
~EHS | 0.668 | 0.646 | 0.047 | 0.065 | 0.681 | 0.606 | 0.072 | 0.061 |
CUR | 0.628 | 0.698 | 0.018 | 0.069 | 0.564 | 0.576 | 0.025 | 0.086 |
~CUR | 0.618 | 0.606 | 0.028 | 0.078 | 0.704 | 0.636 | 0.015 | 0.070 |
HIR | 0.608 | 0.665 | 0.098 | 0.068 | 0.639 | 0.644 | 0.087 | 0.060 |
~HIR | 0.675 | 0.670 | 0.072 | 0.059 | 0.668 | 0.611 | 0.079 | 0.061 |
Y | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
EDL | ⨂ | ⨂ | ⨂ | ● | ● |
SWR | ● | ⨂ | ● | ● | |
STIR | ⨂ | ⨂ | ● | ● | ● |
EHS | ⨂ | ⨂ | ⨂ | ● | |
CUR | ● | ● | ⨂ | ● | ⨂ |
HIR | ● | ⨂ | ● | ⨂ | |
Consistency | 0.907 | 0.929 | 0.918 | 0.911 | 0.919 |
PRI | 0.781 | 0.800 | 0.775 | 0.750 | 0.785 |
Raw coverage | 0.350 | 0.287 | 0.219 | 0.267 | 0.266 |
Unique coverage | 0.059 | 0.028 | 0.004 | 0.039 | 0.029 |
BECONS distance | 0.012 | 0.021 | 0.029 | 0.021 | 0.019 |
WICONS distance | 0.036 | 0.032 | 0.031 | 0.032 | 0.031 |
Pooled consistency | 0.885 | ||||
Pooled PRI | 0.768 | ||||
Pooled coverage | 0.512 |
Configuration 1 | Configuration 2 | Configuration 3 | Configuration 4 | Configuration 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | 0.462 | 0.389 | 0.321 | 0.389 | 0.388 |
SD | 0.289 | 0.253 | 0.275 | 0.289 | 0.308 |
Chi-square | 4.199 | 7.803 | 1.252 | 1.598 | 3.710 |
df. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Sig. | 0.241 | 0.050 * | 0.741 | 0.660 | 0.294 |
Regions | Configuration 2 |
---|---|
East | 0.263 |
Central | 0.361 |
West | 0.540 |
Northeast | 0.266 |
Y | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
EDL | ⨂ | ⨂ | ● | ||
SWR | ● | ⨂ | ● | ● | |
STIR | ⨂ | ⨂ | ● | ● | |
EHS | ⨂ | ⨂ | ● | ||
CUR | ● | ● | ⨂ | ● | ⨂ |
HIR | ● | ● | ⨂ | ||
Consistency | 0.891 | 0.907 | 0.910 | 0.899 | 0.903 |
PRI | 0.778 | 0.779 | 0.767 | 0.776 | 0.767 |
Raw coverage | 0.341 | 0.286 | 0.216 | 0.265 | 0.268 |
Unique coverage | 0.058 | 0.029 | 0.007 | 0.041 | 0.031 |
BECONS distance | 0.012 | 0.023 | 0.028 | 0.020 | 0.019 |
WICONS distance | 0.035 | 0.033 | 0.030 | 0.033 | 0.031 |
Pooled consistency | 0.853 | ||||
Pooled PRI | 0.728 | ||||
Pooled coverage | 0.503 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yan, H.; Zhang, H. External Resource Dependence and Implementation Efficiency of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): A Hybrid Design Based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Dynamic Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Sustainability 2025, 17, 3809. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093809
Yan H, Zhang H. External Resource Dependence and Implementation Efficiency of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): A Hybrid Design Based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Dynamic Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Sustainability. 2025; 17(9):3809. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093809
Chicago/Turabian StyleYan, Haoqun, and Hongfeng Zhang. 2025. "External Resource Dependence and Implementation Efficiency of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): A Hybrid Design Based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Dynamic Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)" Sustainability 17, no. 9: 3809. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093809
APA StyleYan, H., & Zhang, H. (2025). External Resource Dependence and Implementation Efficiency of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): A Hybrid Design Based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Dynamic Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Sustainability, 17(9), 3809. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093809