1. Introduction
The 14th Five-Year Plan for Digital Government Development emphasizes the need to restructure government capacity using data as a key element, promoting the digital and intelligent transformation of public services [
1]. With the rapid advancement of digital technologies and the continued implementation of the “Internet Plus” strategy, e-government platforms have become increasingly vital in government governance and public service delivery [
2]. In this study, e-government refers to the comprehensive transformation of traditional administrative models through the application of modern information technologies such as big data, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence. Its primary aim is to streamline administrative processes, improve efficiency, and ultimately provide residents with more convenient, efficient, and transparent services [
3].
Tourism government service websites, established by cultural and tourism authorities, serve as official online platforms and key bridges between governments and the public. These platforms are not only responsible for disseminating policy information, promoting tourism resources, and providing online services, but have also emerged as critical tools for facilitating high-quality tourism development [
4,
5]. Provincial comprehensive economic competitiveness refers to a multidimensional evaluation of a region’s development level, environmental quality, and government performance [
6]. Digital governance is playing an increasingly significant role in advancing tourism. Sousa et al. [
7,
8] highlight that digital technologies are profoundly transforming tourist experiences and business operations. These technologies not only enhance visitor satisfaction but also facilitate industry transformation and upgrading [
9]. According to real-time data from the National Government Service Platform, all 31 provincial-level cultural and tourism departments in China have established online service portals offering tourism-related government services. Although the construction and operation of these platforms have made significant progress in recent years, the relationship between their service functions and regional tourism development has yet to be fully elucidated.
As a key driver of economic growth in China, tourism plays a vital role in promoting regional development. In 2023, domestic tourism revenue reached RMB 4.91 trillion, contributing 7.86% to GDP and supporting 74.7 million jobs [
10]. Research indicates that tourism development is profoundly influenced by government services, policy support, and information technology [
11,
12]. In 2024, 75% of tourists obtained travel information using online platforms [
13]. Provincial tourism government service websites may have a substantial impact on local tourism development by improving information transparency, simplifying administrative procedures, and optimizing resource allocation. Given that tourism is a resource-dependent industry, its development is closely linked to regional economic conditions and resource endowments [
14]. However, variations in tourism resources and economic competitiveness across provinces suggest that the influence of government website service functions on tourism development may be geographically differentiated [
15,
16].
Therefore, this study introduces tourism resources as a mediating variable to analyze their role in the relationship between government platform service functions and tourism development. In addition, provincial comprehensive economic competitiveness is incorporated as an external variable to explore the internal and external pathways through which provincial tourism government service websites affect tourism development. This approach carries significant theoretical and practical implications.
By focusing on all 31 provincial-level tourism government service websites in China, this study investigates their impact on tourism development, with particular attention given to the mediating role of tourism resources and the moderating role of comprehensive provincial economic competitiveness. The objective is to reveal the internal and external driving mechanisms of tourism industry development in a digital governance environment and to provide a theoretical foundation and policy recommendations for optimizing digital government services and promoting high-quality tourism development.
2. Theoretical Framework and Literature Review
This study constructs an analytical framework based on three theoretical perspectives: public administration theory, resource dependence theory, and regional innovation systems theory.
Tourism government service websites are platforms developed by government agencies using modern information management models and network communication technologies to optimize departmental structures and workflows, providing the public with convenient and efficient tourism-related services [
17]. The public administration theoretical system offers the most direct support for the functional design of such platforms. From this perspective, government service models are transitioning from traditional administrative paradigms to models based on new public management and new public service concepts [
18]. Accordingly, the functions of government websites have evolved from one-way information dissemination to two-way interactive services [
19]. Hood’s [
20] new public management theory emphasizes the introduction of business management principles to enhance service efficiency and quality, while Osborne’s [
21] new public governance theory stresses multi-actor participation and networked governance—both providing a theoretical basis for the functional design of tourism government websites.
Tourism resources form the material foundation for tourism development. Resource dependence theory focuses on the relationship between organizations and their external environments, positing that organizations depend on external resources for survival and growth [
22]. As a typical resource-dependent industry, tourism development heavily relies on natural landscapes and historical and cultural assets. The content and priorities of tourism government platforms often vary significantly according to regional tourism resource endowments [
23]. Recent studies indicate a complex nonlinear relationship between tourism resources and tourism development; regions with higher levels of informatization are more effective in transforming resource advantages into economic benefits [
24]. This suggests that information technology may serve as a key medium in converting tourism resources into industrial development. Thus, tourism resources not only constitute the material basis for development but also play a critical role in shaping the content of government platforms. For this reason, tourism resources are treated as a mediating variable in this study.
The theory of regional innovation systems emphasizes that regional economic development depends on the interactions among innovation actors and the institutional environment [
25]. Under this theoretical lens, a regional innovation system is essentially the outcome of economic activity organized at the regional level [
26]. Together, these perspectives provide the theoretical foundation for analyzing provincial-level comprehensive economic competitiveness in China—focusing both on the spatial clustering of innovation factors and the shaping effects of institutional environments. Within the framework of tourism governance, even if the service functions of tourism government websites are well developed, a lack of robust economic support may limit their effectiveness in promoting tourism. Therefore, this study considers provincial comprehensive economic competitiveness as an external variable affecting the relationship between government platforms and tourism development.
Existing research primarily focuses on the role of government websites in enhancing tourism, such as improving service efficiency and optimizing resource allocation [
27,
28,
29]. Studies on the relationship between tourism resources and development have identified resource richness and development level as key factors in sustainable tourism growth [
30,
31]. For instance, Zhang Qinyue [
32], using the TOE framework, confirmed that digital governance enhances the allocation of cultural and tourism resources. Ying Haojie [
33] found that Zhejiang’s cultural and tourism department significantly increased destination visibility using targeted marketing on new media platforms. Furthermore, regions with stronger economic competitiveness exhibit clear advantages in infrastructure, public service provision, and market appeal [
34]. The digital economy is also recognized as a powerful driver of high-quality tourism development [
35]. However, these studies often focus on individual factors without incorporating mediating variables.
Drawing on domestic and international tourism evaluation systems [
36,
37,
38,
39], this study selects four core indicators to assess provincial tourism development: the number of travel agencies, number of star-rated hotels, number of tourists, and tourism revenue. These metrics reflect the overall development of the tourism industry in terms of industrial scale, reception capacity, market activity, and economic contribution. Notably, Destination Management Organizations (DMOs), as leadership entities composed of government agencies, stakeholders, and professionals, play a key role in fostering partnerships and shared visions [
36]. Under China’s administrative system, provincial tourism government websites assume some of the DMOs’ responsibilities by promoting tourism through administrative management, information management, and public service functions [
40,
41]. These three functional dimensions are therefore used to assess website service content.
With the implementation of the “Internet Plus Government” strategy, the Website Quality Index (WQI) has emerged as a critical tool for evaluating tourism government websites. It reflects overall quality across four dimensions: technical performance, communication, connectivity, and persuasive capacity [
23]. Lu Yunting [
42] categorized tourism resources into the following categories: (1) natural attractions (geology, landforms, hydrology, climate, and flora and fauna); (2) cultural attractions (relics, ethnic customs, arts, theme parks, sports venues, exhibitions); and (3) integrated attractions (urban landscapes, rural scenery). Zeng Qiguo [
43] classified resources into natural (land, water, biological, climate), cultural (historical), and service-related resources (local specialties). Li Minghui and Guo Jianxing concluded that all classification schemes ultimately fall under two broad categories: natural and cultural resources [
44,
45]. Based on this framework, this study divides tourism resources into two main categories: natural tourism resources and cultural tourism resources. Natural resources include geomorphic landscapes, water bodies, and biological landscapes; cultural resources include historical relics, modern facilities, religious sites, and folk customs. Additionally, the number and grade of tourist attractions are important indicators of tourism competitiveness, with AAAAA-rated scenic areas being the highest and most influential in China [
46]. Therefore, the number of 4A and 5A scenic spots is used to measure the quantity of tourism resources.
Provincial comprehensive economic competitiveness reflects regional innovation capacity and development levels, encompassing nine dimensions: macroeconomy, industrial economy, sustainable development, fiscal and financial systems, knowledge economy, development environment, government performance, development level, and coordinated planning [
6].
In summary, while existing research has demonstrated the positive role of digital governance in promoting tourism by optimizing resource allocation and facilitating industrial transformation, and while the impact of economic competitiveness on tourism has also been confirmed, no studies have yet examined the combined influence of tourism government websites, tourism resources, and provincial economic competitiveness. To address this gap, this study proposes a theoretical framework incorporating “service functions–mediating variable–external variable”, focusing on 31 provincial-level tourism government websites in China. Specifically, it investigates the mediating role of tourism resources and the moderating role of economic competitiveness and proposes the following research hypotheses:
H1: The content and quality of services provided by provincial tourism government websites positively influence tourism development.
H2: The quantity and type of tourism resources mediate the relationship between tourism government websites and tourism development.
H3: Provincial comprehensive economic competitiveness moderates the relationship between tourism government websites and tourism development.
3. Research Data and Methods
3.1. Research Framework
This study investigates the relationship between provincial tourism governance websites and tourism development in China, using tourism resource quantity and types as mediating variables and provincial economic comprehensive competitiveness as a moderating variable. The study encompasses four main variables: the independent variable is the service functions of provincial tourism governance websites (website service content, Website Quality Index (WQI)); the external variable is provincial economic comprehensive competitiveness (nine dimensions); the mediating variable is tourism resource quantity and types; and the dependent variable is provincial tourism development (four indicators). Based on the research background, objectives, and related literature, a research framework diagram is proposed (
Figure 1).
3.2. Data Sources
This study employed a multi-stage, systematic data collection strategy to ensure comprehensiveness and representativeness.
To collect data on the service content of tourism government websites, all 31 provincial-level administrative regions in China were selected to ensure geographic representativeness. The study focused on a complete annual period from 1 January to 31 December 2023, in order to eliminate seasonal fluctuations. In accordance with the standardized requirements outlined in the Guidelines for Government Website Development, the “Notices and Announcements” section of each website was selected as the primary textual source, as it serves as a central channel for disseminating key government decisions and actions, thereby reflecting the service orientation of the websites. The collected titles were standardized into Word documents, with non-substantive elements such as dates and numerical codes removed during the preprocessing phase.
Data on the website quality index (WQI) were derived from the Annual Work Reports of Government Websites compiled by provincial tourism authorities, which are considered authoritative sources for evaluating website performance. From the original 36 evaluation indicators, this study selected core variables representing the four dimensions proposed by Fernández-Cavia et al.—technology, communication, contact, and persuasion. These indicators were then standardized using Z-scores to eliminate the influence of differing units and enhance comparability.
Tourism resource data were obtained from official sources and publicly recognized platforms. The number of 4A and 5A scenic spots in each province was collected directly from the official lists published by provincial tourism administrations. Descriptive data on tourism resource types were systematically gathered from the Baidu Encyclopedia pages of each province’s scenic attractions, given the platform’s comprehensiveness and public familiarity. Based on the literature review and established classification frameworks, the resources were coded into seven categories: geomorphic landscapes, aquatic landscapes, biological landscapes, historical relics, modern facilities, religious culture, and folk customs. Keyword frequencies in each category were quantified using the TF-IDF algorithm to assess the relative prominence of each resource type.
Tourism development data were selected based on the multi-dimensional characteristics of the tourism industry. Four core indicators were used: the number of travel agencies, number of star-rated hotels, total tourist arrivals, and tourism revenue. These represent industrial scale, reception capacity, market activity, and economic contribution, respectively. All data were obtained from the China Tourism Statistical Yearbook and official provincial statistics. To enhance comparability, indicators were standardized to eliminate dimensional inconsistencies.
As the latest report on provincial economic competitiveness for 2022–2023 had not been published, data from the 2021–2022 period were used for lag analysis. Despite the time gap, the relative stability of regional competitiveness ensures that this substitution has a minimal effect on the robustness of the findings.
3.3. Methods
3.3.1. Content Analysis Method
Content analysis is a mixed-method approach that systematically and objectively identifies textual characteristics for analytical and inferential purposes [
47]. This study used content analysis to collect, organize, and examine various data, including the “Notices and Announcements” sections of 31 provincial tourism government websites, annual government website reports, provincial economic competitiveness indicators, tourism development metrics, and tourism resource classifications. A systematic framework was constructed to code key variables such as information themes and frequencies. Two trained researchers independently performed trial coding and engaged in multiple rounds of discussion to reach consensus. During the formal analysis phase, all data were collected and cross-validated independently by both researchers. Any discrepancies were resolved through negotiation, and a third expert was consulted when necessary. Inter-coder reliability was assessed using Cohen’s Kappa coefficient, which yielded values above 0.85, indicating a high level of agreement and ensuring the reliability and objectivity of the results.
3.3.2. Keyword Extraction Method
Keyword extraction is a core technique for processing unstructured textual data [
48]. In this study, it was used to analyze the content of both the government websites and the descriptive texts on provincial tourism resources. Preprocessing involved removing stopwords, punctuation, and other irrelevant information. The NLPIR-ICTCLAS 2023 semantic analysis system was then employed for Chinese word segmentation and part-of-speech tagging. Keywords were extracted using a combination of the TF-IDF (Term Frequency and Inverse Document Frequency) algorithm and the TextRank algorithm. TF-IDF is calculated using the formula:
Here, n represents the number of times the term appears in a certain text; ∑n is the total number of terms in that text; N is the total number of documents; and D is the number of documents containing the term. The module will also filter out the terms with higher TF-IDF values as feature words according to the set threshold or sorting rule.
Two experienced researchers independently conducted the keyword extraction and classification. Then, results were compared, and Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was calculated. A value above 0.85 indicated strong agreement. Any disagreements in classification were resolved by a third expert to ensure methodological reliability and result validity.
3.3.3. The PLS Path Modeling Method
Partial least squares (PLS) path modeling is a variance-based technique suitable for exploratory research and small-sample analysis [
49]. It offers several advantages: it does not require normal data distribution, performs well with small samples, accommodates complex models, tolerates missing data in external variables, and allows simultaneous processing of multiple independent and dependent variables [
50]. Moreover, bootstrapping techniques embedded in PLS models are effective for handling small samples and non-normal data. Given the sample size (31 provinces) and the model’s complexity—including multiple latent variables and non-normally distributed data—SmartPLS 4.0 software was employed for analysis. The analysis was conducted in three stages: first, examining the direct relationship between tourism government websites and tourism development; second, introducing tourism resources as a mediating variable; and third, incorporating provincial economic competitiveness as a moderating variable. In each stage, the measurement model was assessed according to the standards for formative and reflective indicators, followed by an evaluation of the structural model.
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
5.1. Conclusions
The study finds three key conclusions regarding the relationship between government websites and tourism development.
First, government websites have a positive but limited impact on tourism development, with an explanatory power of 24.4%. Among the website functions, public service functions have a significantly higher contribution (weight: 0.611) than administrative management (0.368) and information management (0.238). This moderate explanatory power should be understood dialectically. On one hand, it suggests that digital governance is just one of many factors influencing tourism development, aligning with Zhou et al.’s [
51] finding that smart destination strategies explain 21.8% of tourism development. On the other hand, it highlights the limitations of using notifications and announcements as content proxies for government websites, as they may not fully capture the scope of website functions. Despite this, the significant contribution of public service functions affirms the application of new public service theory in the context of digital governance.
Second, while tourism resources did not show a significant mediating role between e-government and tourism development, the analysis of different resource types revealed that cultural resources (weight: 0.512) contribute more to tourism development than water landscapes (0.443) and geological landscapes (0.338). This finding may be explained by the advantages of “soft resources” in the digital environment, consistent with Richards’ [
52] observations on the significant added value of cultural tourism elements in digital media. The absence of a significant mediating effect contrasts with Zavattaro and Bryer’s [
54] research, which found a positive correlation between resource abundance and government website effectiveness. This discrepancy may be due to differences in resource measurement methods, indicating a more complex, nonlinear relationship between resources and e-government than a simple mediation effect.
Third, provincial economic competitiveness significantly moderates the relationship between government websites and tourism development, increasing the model’s explanatory power to 47.9%. This strong moderating effect highlights the crucial role of regional economic conditions in the effectiveness of digital governance, in line with the regional innovation systems theory. The roles of development level competitiveness (weight: 0.268) and government action competitiveness (weight: 0.267) are consistent with Zhang et al.’s [
4] findings on the role of government economic governance capacity in promoting high-quality tourism development. Notably, after introducing economic competitiveness variables, the previously insignificant website quality index became significant (path coefficient increased from 0.282 to 0.279,
p < 0.05). This interaction effect suggests that the impact of technical quality may be either enhanced or suppressed depending on regional economic conditions.
5.2. Recommendations
5.2.1. Differentiated Strategies
The study results indicate that the impact of tourism government websites on tourism development is significantly moderated by the regional economic environment. Therefore, it is recommended to implement differentiated digital service strategies based on the economic development level and resource endowments of each region. For economically developed areas, where there is a strong foundation for tourism development, government websites should focus on providing innovative and personalized service functions, such as smart tourism recommendations and one-stop service platforms. These advanced features would enhance the digital representation and dissemination of regional tourism brands. For economically underdeveloped regions, given the significant contribution of public service functions (weight: 0.611) to tourism development, priority should be given to improving core public services, such as online service applications and complaint handling, to maximize service effectiveness with limited resources. This recommendation directly responds to the empirical finding in the study that the contribution of public service functions is significantly higher than that of administrative management and information management functions.
5.2.2. Resource-Oriented Website Design
The study found significant differences in the impact of different types of tourism resources on government platform content production and tourism development. Specifically, cultural resources (weight: 0.512) contribute more to tourism development than natural landscape resources. Based on this finding, it is recommended that government websites adopt a resource-oriented, differentiated strategy for content development. For regions rich in cultural resources, government platforms should enhance the digital expression of cultural IP, creating immersive digital experiences such as VR folk experiences and digital exhibitions of intangible cultural heritage. This approach takes full advantage of the digital platform’s strengths in cultural dissemination. As found in the study, the effectiveness of cultural resources in digital environments is higher than that of natural landscape resources, and the digital expression of “soft resources” may be more engaging for users. For regions abundant in natural landscape resources, the focus should be on integrating geological and water resources with emerging tourism formats, such as promoting outdoor sports experiences and eco-tourism routes through digital content, overcoming the limitations of purely natural resources in digital representation. This recommendation directly addresses the study’s finding that the influence of geological and water landscape resources is relatively limited in digital environments.
5.2.3. Prioritizing Technological Functionality
In enhancing website quality, priority should be given to optimizing technological functions, such as ensuring the stability of service systems and enhancing cybersecurity measures. These factors directly affect user experience and service efficiency. The study reveals that the technological dimension is crucial for ensuring government website quality and serves as the foundation for maximizing service effectiveness.
5.2.4. Strengthening Public Services
Given that the weight of public service factors (0.611) is significantly higher than that of administrative management (0.368) and information management (0.238), local governments should strengthen the public service functions of their websites. Key areas for improvement include online service applications, visitor inquiries and complaints, and stakeholder coordination, promoting the transformation of government websites from “management-oriented” to “service-oriented” platforms.
5.3. Research Limitations and Future Directions
Despite the contributions of this study, several limitations need to be critically addressed.
First, the sample is limited to cross-sectional data from 31 provincial-level administrative regions, without considering time-based analysis. This restricts the ability to capture the dynamic evolution of e-government and tourism development and makes it difficult to control for potential endogeneity issues. For example, regions with higher levels of tourism development may invest more in building government websites, which could lead to reverse causality, affecting the validity of the results.
Second, the explanatory power of the model is relatively low at 24.4%, suggesting that there are significant unexplained factors. This limitation could stem from the measurement methods used for government website services, which primarily rely on analysis of announcement titles and may not fully capture the breadth of website functions. Additionally, important factors like marketing efforts and infrastructure development were not considered in the study, and the assumption of linear relationships among variables may overlook possible nonlinear interactions.
Third, tourism resource data were sourced from Baidu Baike, which may not fully cover all resources or may be biased in public perception. While the study found differences in the influence of different types of resources (e.g., geological landscapes, water landscapes, cultural elements), the mechanisms underlying these differences, such as resource development level, management quality, and accessibility, were not fully explored.
Fourth, from a methodological perspective, although PLS is suitable for small sample studies, the sample size of 31 may still lead to insufficient statistical power when testing complex models. The simultaneous testing of mediation and moderation effects increased the model’s complexity, which may have reduced the stability of parameter estimates.
Given these limitations, future research could expand in several directions. One avenue would be to conduct longitudinal studies using panel data to better control for time effects and endogeneity issues. Another would be to refine the measurement of government website functions, incorporating user experience evaluations and real usage data for more comprehensive assessments. Additionally, a more sophisticated resource evaluation system could be developed, incorporating multiple dimensions such as resource development level, quality, and accessibility. Expanding the sample size to include municipal-level or tourism destination-level units could also increase statistical power and improve the robustness of the findings. Lastly, future research could explore more complex nonlinear models, such as threshold effect models or multi-level interaction models, to more accurately reflect the complex relationships between variables. These improvements would deepen the understanding of the relationship between e-government and tourism development.