Next Article in Journal
Spatial–Temporal Joint Design and Optimization of Phase-Coded Waveform for MIMO Radar
Previous Article in Journal
Range-Velocity Measurement Accuracy Improvement Based on Joint Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Multi-Input Multi-Output Radar
Previous Article in Special Issue
Validation of Multisource Altimeter SWH Measurements for Climate Data Analysis in China’s Offshore Waters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

An Improved Remote Sensing Retrieval Method for Elevated Duct in the South China Sea

1
School of Marine Technology and Geomatics, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China
2
Ocean Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University, Taicang 215400, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(14), 2649; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142649
Submission received: 29 May 2024 / Revised: 12 July 2024 / Accepted: 17 July 2024 / Published: 19 July 2024

Abstract

Elevated duct is an atmospheric structure characterized by abnormal refractive index gradients, which can significantly affect the performance of radar, communication, and other systems by capturing a portion of electromagnetic waves. The South China Sea (SCS) is a high-incidence area for elevated duct, so conducting detection and forecasts of the elevated duct in the SCS holds important scientific significance and practical value. This paper attempts to utilize remote sensing techniques for extracting elevated duct information. Based on GPS sounding data, a lapse rate formula (LRF) model and an empirical formula (EF) model for the estimation of the cloud top height of Stratocumulus were obtained, and then remote sensing retrieval methods of elevated duct were established based on the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) remote sensing data. The results of these two models were compared with results from the elevated duct remote sensing retrieval model developed by the United States Naval Postgraduate School. It is shown that the probability of elevated duct events was 79.1% when the presence of Stratocumulus identified using GPS sounding data, and the trapping layer bottom height of elevated duct well with the cloud top height of Stratocumulus, with a correlation coefficient of 0.79, a mean absolute error of 289 m, and a root mean square error of 598 m. Among the different retrieval models applied to MODIS satellite data, the LRF model emerged as the optimal remote sensing retrieval method for elevated duct in the SCS, showing a correlation coefficient of 0.51, a mean absolute error of 447 m, and a root mean square error of 658 m between the trapping layer bottom height and the cloud top height. Consequently, the encouraging validation results demonstrate that the LRF model proposed in this paper offers a novel method for diagnosing and calculating elevated ducts information over large-scale marine areas from remote sensing data.
Keywords: South China Sea; elevated duct; lapse rate formula; retrieval model; remote sensing data South China Sea; elevated duct; lapse rate formula; retrieval model; remote sensing data

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, Y.; Zha, M.; Qiao, W.; He, H.; Wang, S.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; He, W. An Improved Remote Sensing Retrieval Method for Elevated Duct in the South China Sea. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2649. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142649

AMA Style

Cheng Y, Zha M, Qiao W, He H, Wang S, Wang S, Li X, He W. An Improved Remote Sensing Retrieval Method for Elevated Duct in the South China Sea. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(14):2649. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142649

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Yinhe, Mengling Zha, Wenli Qiao, Hongjian He, Shuwen Wang, Shengxiang Wang, Xiaoran Li, and Weiye He. 2024. "An Improved Remote Sensing Retrieval Method for Elevated Duct in the South China Sea" Remote Sensing 16, no. 14: 2649. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142649

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop