Skip to Content
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
  • Correction
  • Open Access

30 September 2024

Correction: Ocholla et al. Livestock Detection and Counting in Kenyan Rangelands Using Aerial Imagery and Deep Learning Techniques. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2929

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
2
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
3
Wangari Maathai Institute for Environmental and Peace Studies, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 29053-00625, Kenya
4
Department of Geospatial and Space Technology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 30197-00100, Kenya
The authors would like to make the following corrections to their published paper [1].
We found that an error was made in the text of the Introduction section, paragraph six, where we stated “[…] However, the experiment was conducted in homogeneous herds where animals were 2 to 3 m apart. This method may not be applicable in scenarios where animals are clustered in herds”. While the animal herds were homogeneous in terms of species, the spacing between the animals was not consistently 2 to 3 m apart. Some images featured animal herds with animals that were in close proximity of each other.
Therefore, the following correction has been made to the Introduction section, paragraph six: “The experiment was conducted in homogeneous herds for dense, medium, and sparse animal herds”.
In the Discussion section, Section 4.2, paragraph three, the values of the HerdNet model were wrongly cited from the validation results rather than the final test values of the cited study, as follows: “Compared to a similar study conducted in Chad [21], the YOLOv5m model used in our study outperformed the HerdNet model, which attained a Precision and total count error of 75.4% and −14.6%, respectively”.
The following correction has been made to the Discussion section, Section 4.2, paragraph three: “Compared to a similar study conducted in Chad [21], the YOLOv5m model used in our study outperformed the HerdNet model, which attained a Precision and total count error of 77.5% and −9.4%, respectively”.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. These corrections were approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Ocholla, I.A.; Pellikka, P.; Karanja, F.; Vuorinne, I.; Väisänen, T.; Boitt, M.; Heiskanen, J. Livestock Detection and Counting in Kenyan Rangelands Using Aerial Imagery and Deep Learning Techniques. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.