Next Article in Journal
Performing MHz-Level Repetition Rate Tuning for Coherent Dual-Microcomb Interferometry
Previous Article in Journal
Design Optimization of RF MEMS-Driven Triangular Resonators with Sierpinski Geometry for Dual-Band Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analyzing the Impact of Gate Oxide Screening on Interface Trap Density in SiC Power MOSFETs Using a Novel Temperature-Triggered Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A High-Density 4H-SiC MOSFET Based on a Buried Field Limiting Ring with Low Qgd and Ron

School of Microelectronics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2025, 16(4), 447; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16040447
Submission received: 11 March 2025 / Revised: 7 April 2025 / Accepted: 8 April 2025 / Published: 10 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue SiC Based Miniaturized Devices, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

:
In this study, we propose an optimized shield gate trench 4H-SiC structure with effective gate oxide protection. The proposed device has a split trench with a P+ shield region, and the P+ shield is grounded by the middle deep trench. Our simulation results show that the peak electric field near the gate oxide is almost completely suppressed. Compared with a conventional P+ shield device, our proposed structure achieves a 78% reduction in the Qgd and a 108% increase in the FoM (figure of merit) simultaneously. Additionally, it is estimated that the device cell pitch can be reduced to 1.8 μm with a Ron below 0.94 mΩ·cm2, in theory. These demonstrated device performance metrics, as well as its simple structure and good compatibility, make our proposed SiC MOSFET highly attractive for future high-performance applications.

1. Introduction

Compared with conventional silicon (Si) material, silicon carbide (SiC) exhibits three fundamental material advantages that are critical for power electronics applications: (1) a wide bandgap (3.26 eV for 4H-SiC vs. 1.12 eV for Si), enabling high-temperature operation up to 600 °C; (2) an exceptionally high critical breakdown field strength (2.8 MV/cm for SiC versus 0.3 MV/cm for Si), allowing thinner drift layers and higher voltage blocking capability; and (3) superior thermal conductivity (4.9 W/cm·K for SiC compared to 1.5 W/cm·K for Si), which significantly improves heat dissipation [1,2].
From a fabrication perspective, the design methodology and processing techniques for SiC metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) devices maintain strong compatibility with established silicon-based MOS device manufacturing flows. This includes similar photolithography processes, oxide deposition techniques, and metallization schemes, thereby facilitating the adoption of SiC MOSFETs as direct replacements for silicon power MOSFETs in existing power electronic systems [3,4].
The current technological roadmap for SiC MOSFET development prioritizes four key performance metrics: (i) the minimization of cell dimensions (targeting sub-micron features to increase the current density); (ii) a reduction in specific on-resistance (Ron,sp) through optimized doping profiles and channel mobility enhancement; (iii) the lowering of switching losses (Eoff) via improved minority carrier lifetime control; and (iv) the enhancement of the gate oxide reliability through advanced interfacial passivation techniques [5,6]. Thermal management considerations are becoming increasingly crucial as device densities increase.
In terms of the device architecture, contemporary commercial SiC power MOSFETs predominantly employ either planar or trench gate configurations [7]. The planar topology, while offering simpler fabrication and better gate oxide integrity, presents inherent geometrical constraints in minimizing the cell pitch due to the lateral separation required between adjacent JFET regions. In contrast, trench architectures enable more aggressive pitch scaling through vertical channel formation.
A reduction in the cell pitch yields multiple performance benefits: (a) a substantial decrease in the die area (enabling higher current ratings per unit chip size); (b) a lower specific on-resistance (Ron,sp) through increased channel density; (c) reduced input and output capacitances (Ciss and Coss) due to smaller electrode overlaps; and (d) markedly improved switching efficiency, as evidenced by reduced energy losses during both turn-on (Eon) and turn-off (Eoff) transitions [8,9,10]. Recent studies have demonstrated that every 1 μm reduction in cell pitch can provide an approximate 15–20% improvement in the overall figure of merit (FoM = Ron,sp × Eoff).
Nonetheless, trench SiC MOSFETs encounter certain issues, primarily associated with the gate oxide. Particularly, there exists a strong electric field at the trench bottom, which may give rise to gate oxide premature breakdown [11,12,13]. Numerous approaches have been proposed to mitigate the electric field based on numerical simulations [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]; however, these methods often entail complex structures and pose challenges in terms of process feasibility.
In contemporary SiC MOSFET designs, the self-aligned additional P+ shielding layer is commonly employed to significantly decrease the electric field. However, this approach also leads to an increase in the device’s Ron, and the presence of a floating P+ region also introduces the issue of the charge storage effect [23,24].
A grounding P+-shield region at the bottom of a trench offers significant benefits, especially in terms of improved gate oxide protection, a well-researched area. However, it is difficult to achieve P+ grounding at the bottom of the trench in both process and device structure, which is currently a research focus of research institutions including Infineon and Rohm. Infineon has addressed this challenge by connecting the shield P+ to a 0 potential through a semi-enclosed trench structure [25]. Nevertheless, this technique results in the wastage of half of the channel area, thereby limiting further advancements in chip density. Rohm adopts a grounded source trench on both sides of each gate trench, which also faces the problem of low integration.
To address these challenges, we present a novel solution in this study: a buried field limiting ring device (P+ shield) grounded through a deep trench. The trench gate structure is divided into three distinct sections and the two side sections serve as conventional gates. Our proposed device fabrication process ensures full compatibility with high-density integration, high breakdown voltage (BV), low Ron, and various other advantages.

2. Structure Design and Fabrication Process

Figure 1a,b depict the schematic structures of the proposed and conventional P+ shield 4H-SiC trench gate MOSFETs. And the main structure and process parameters of the device are shown in Table 1. In the proposed device, the trench gate is divided into symmetrical components through the incorporation of a deep trench structure. The deep trench is embedded into the drift region to form a P+ shield grounded channel. As a result, the inverted p-n junction in the OFF state is pushed down into the drift region, effectively confining the depletion region outside the channel region. As a result, the peak electric field near the gate oxide is almost completely suppressed. In comparison to the conventional device, the proposed device maintains identical structures and doping profiles. The 4H-SiC substrate possesses a doping concentration of 7.0 × 1015 cm−3 to obtain a BV higher than 1200 V. The normal trench gate depth (1 μm), cell pitch (2.4 μm), total trench width (1.6 μm), and ion implantation conditions for the P+ shield region are also kept consistent. The doping concentration of the P+ shield and P base are 2 × 1019 cm−3 and 2.5 × 1017 cm−3, respectively.
Figure 2 illustrates one available fabrication process for the proposed SiC MOSFET. (a) The N-drift is formed on the N+ substrate using epitaxial techniques, and then, the emitter P+N+ is formed by photolithography (PEP) and ion implantation (ion); (b) oxide deposition, PEP, oxide etching, and SiC etching to form a deep trench; (c) oxide deposition, etching to form side walls, and self-aligned bottom P-well injection; (d) annealing for ion activation and oxide etching; (e) oxide deposition and chemical mechanical polishing (CMP); (f) PEP and oxide etching; (g) SiC etching; (h) thermal oxidation process to form the gate oxide; (i) polysilicon deposition and etching; (j) oxide deposition; (k) PEP and oxide coating etching to form ground channels in the bottom of deep trench; (l) metal deposition.
All of the process steps are compatible with current manufacturing processes and require only one additional lithography mask. The proposed device has advantages of a simple structure and low cost, as the manufacturing cost is mainly related to the duration of lithography.

3. Simulation Results and Discussion

Two-dimensional (2D) simulation models are developed, utilizing the existing SiC MOSFET process as the foundation. The proposed device and conventional devices with and without a P+ shield are chosen to be compared. The crucial models are taken into account, including Shockley–Read–Hall recombination, Auger recombination, Okuto–Crowell impact ionization, incomplete dopant ionization, doping-dependent transport, band narrowing, barrier lowering, anisotropic material properties, non-local tunneling, and so on. The effect of the SiO2/SiC interface traps is taken into consideration and the charge concentration is 2 × 1011 cm−2. And the channel mobility below the SiC/SiO2 interface is about 20–50 cm2·V−1s−1 by modifying the parameters of the Lombardi model.
A. Breakdown characteristics
Figure 3a displays the electric field distributions in the OFF-state (VDS = 1340 V) for the investigated SiC MOSFETs. It is evident that the high-electric-field region primarily resides within the inverted PN junction formed by the P+ region and the drift region, as the grounded P+ shield effectively diverts the electric field. The electric field at the trench gate corner has a considerably lower value of 0.41 MV/cm, which is well below the acceptable threshold of 3 MV/cm. In contrast, the electric field in the P+ shield region reaches 3.5 MV/cm, which is approximately nine times greater than that at the gate corner, with an ionization rate of about 1.28 × 1019 cm−3s−1. Consequently, the proposed device effectively suppresses early breakdown at the corner and resolves the degradation of dynamic on-resistance (Ron) associated with the floating P+ shield. In comparison to the conventional device without the P+ shield, the maximum electric field in the gate oxide of the proposed device decreases by 65.7% (from 3.5 to 1.2 MV/cm), as illustrated in Figure 3b, thereby achieving superior gate oxide reliability. The OFF-state breakdown characteristics of the studied devices are compared in Figure 3c. The BVs of the proposed device and the conventional device with the P+ shield region are above 1.3 kV, while the BV of the device without the P+ shield is only 750 V. The impact of the deep trench on the breakdown characteristics is also investigated in Figure 3d. A slight decrease in the effective thickness of the N-drift region from 1.5 to 2.4 μm results in a minor degradation in the BV. However, this slight decrease in the BV is well justified by the reduction in the gate oxide field, which is the limiting factor for device reliability.
B. Conduction characteristics
As depicted in Figure 4a, the estimated Ron values for the proposed device, conventional device with the P+ shield, and conventional device without the P+ shield are 1.51, 100, and 1.28 mΩ·cm2, respectively. The introduction of the P+ shield significantly affects the conduction characteristics by increasing the electron flow resistance near the sidewall. However, the proposed device successfully concentrates the distribution of the P+ region, minimizing the impact on the Ron. By optimizing the doping profile of the body region, the 17.8% increase in the Ron can be offset and improved. The depth of the deep trench has little effect on the Ron, as illustrated in the inserted picture in Figure 4a. Figure 4b presents a comparison of the trade-off relationship between the BV and Ron for the three devices. The proposed device achieves the optimal combination of a high BV and low Ron simultaneously. Moreover, a deeper depth allows the inverted PN junction in the OFF state to penetrate further into the drift zone. This enables the possibility of further reducing Ron by increasing the doping concentration of the JFET region during epitaxial growth (or by ion implantation), as depicted in Figure 4c, without compromising other characteristics. It should be noted that introducing a grounded deep trench in the device structure will increase the width of the trench, which may impede further reductions in the cell size. To address this challenge, a corresponding layout arrangement is proposed, as depicted in Figure 4d. The proposed layout design distributes grounding at intersections and centers, allowing sufficient space for grounding vias. In this design, the width of the cross-region is set to 1.414 times the length (1.414 L), providing ample room for the incorporation of grounding vias.
By implementing the proposed layout arrangement as described, the device cell pitch can be effectively reduced to 1.8 μm. Furthermore, this reduction in cell pitch is achieved while maintaining a desirable on-resistance (Ron) value below 0.94 mΩ·cm2. This approach allows for the efficient utilization of space, optimizing the device’s overall performance characteristics, and enabling the realization of a compact and high-performing device design.
C. Switching characteristics
The capacitance distribution of the proposed device is shown in Figure 5a. The dominating part of the Miller Cgd is decomposed into Cgs. The results show that the Qgd values for the conventional and the proposed device are 330 nC/cm2 and 67 nC/cm2, respectively. The gate charge curve of the proposed device has almost no Miller platform. And the increased Qgs can be further reduced by increasing the isolation oxide thickness of the deep trench. Compared with [26], the principle of our device to eliminate Qgd is mainly to convert Cgc into Cgs through the split gate structure, and the optimization should be better, theoretically. While the reduced QG improves the switching speed, faster transitions may exacerbate transient oscillations in the gate or drain-source loop due to parasitic inductances. Techniques such as active gate shaping or PT-symmetric damping could be explored to mitigate such effects in future designs [27].
Table 2 summarizes the performance of the proposed and conventional devices. The proposed structure shows an overall better performance including a low Ron, low Qgd, high BV, and high figure of merit FoM (FoM = BV2/Ron).

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have introduced a novel SiC MOSFET with a distributed grounded P+ shield. This device features a stepped trench and deep trench server as a P+ shield grounded channel. This way, the inverted p-n junction in the OFF state can be pushed down into the drift region to effectively protect the gate oxide, providing enough margin for optimal doping in the body region. Compared with the conventional P+ shield device, a 78% reduction in the Qgd and 108% increase in the FoM are realized simultaneously. Furthermore, the use of P-type polysilicon in the middle deep trench based on this structure can significantly reduce the Schottky barrier and solve the problem of the insufficient reverse conduction ability of the current body Schottky barrier diode. Overall, this is a technology with practical application prospects. This technology represents a fundamental advancement in SiC power device design by simultaneously solving three longstanding challenges, representing a significant advancement in high-voltage power device technology.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, W.C. and J.G.; validation, H.X.; software, W.C.; supervision, D.W.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (623B2028).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Elasser, A.; Chow, T.P. Silicon carbide benefits and advantages for power electronics circuits and systems. Proc. IEEE 2002, 90, 969–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Millan, J.; Godignon, P.; Perpina, X.; Perez-Tomas, A.; Rebollo, J. A survey of wide bandgap power semiconductor devices. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 29, 2155–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Palmour, J.W.; Cheng, L.; Pala, V.; Brunt, E.V.; Lichtenwalner, D.J.; Wang, G.-Y.; Richmond, J.; O’Loughlin, M.; Ryu, S.; Allen, S.T.; et al. Silicon carbide power MOSFETs: Breakthrough performance from 900 V up to 15 kV. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & IC’s (ISPSD), Waikoloa, HI, USA, 15–19 June 2014; pp. 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mikamura, Y.; Hiratsuka, K.; Tsuno, T.; Michikoshi, H.; Tanaka, S.; Masuda, T.; Sekiguchi, T. Novel designed SiC devices for high power and high efficiency systems. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2015, 62, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, D.; Yun, N.; Jang, S.Y.; Morgan, A.J.; Sung, W. An Inclusive Structural Analysis on the Design of 1.2kV 4H-SiC Planar MOSFETs. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2021, 9, 804–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nakamura, T.; Nakano, Y.; Aketa, M.; Nakamura, R.; Mitani, S.; Sakairi, H.; Yokotsuji, Y. High performance SiC trench devices with ultra-low ron. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 5–7 December 2011; pp. 26.5.1–26.5.3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yun, N.; Sung, W. Design and Fabrication Approaches of 400–600 V 4H-SiC Lateral MOSFETs for Emerging Power ICs Application. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2020, 67, 5005–5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wei, J.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, H.; Cheng, C.-H.; Chen, K.J. Low ON-resistance SiC trench/planar MOSFET with reduced OFF-state oxide field and low gate charges. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016, 37, 1458–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peters, D.; Siemieniec, R.; Aichinger, T.; Basler, T.; Esteve, R.; Bergner, W.; Kueck, D. Performance and ruggedness of 1200 V SiC—Trench—MOSFET. In Proceedings of the 2017 29th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and IC’s (ISPSD), Sapporo, Japan, 28 May–1 June 2017; pp. 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Han, K.; Baliga, B.J.; Sung, W. Split-gate 1.2-kV 4H-SiC MOSFET: Analysis and experimental validation. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38, 1437–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Harada, S.; Kobayashi, Y.; Ariyoshi, K.; Kojima, T.; Senzaki, J.; Tanaka, Y. 3.3kV-class 4H-SiC MeV-implanted UMOSFET with reduced gate oxide field. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016, 37, 314–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Song, Q.; Yang, S.; Tang, G.; Han, C.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. 4H-SiC Trench MOSFET with L-Shaped Gate. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016, 37, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, H.; Wang, B.; Kong, L.; Liu, L.; Chen, H.; Long, T.; Udrea, F.; Sheng, K. 4H-SiC Trench Gate Lateral MOSFET with Dual Source Trenches for Improved Performance and Reliability. IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 2023, 23, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tanaka, R.; Kagawa, Y.; Fujiwara, N.; Sugawara, K.; Fukui, Y.; Miura, N.; Yamakawa, S. Impact of grounding the bottom oxide protection layer on the short-circuit ruggedness of 4H-SiC trench MOSFETs. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & IC’s (ISPSD), Waikoloa, HI, USA, 15–19 June 2014; pp. 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Y.; Tian, K.; Hao, Y.; Yu, C.-H.; Liu, Y.-J. 4H–SiC Step Trench Gate Power Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016, 37, 633–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guo, J.; Li, P.; Jiang, J.; Zeng, W.; Wang, R.; Wu, H.; Gan, P.; Lin, Z.; Hu, S.; Tang, F. A New 4H-SiC Trench MOSFET With Improved Reverse Conduction, Breakdown, and Switching Characteristics. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2023, 70, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, X.; Gong, H.; Jia, Y.; Hu, D.; Wu, Y.; Xia, T.; Pang, H.; Zhao, Y. SiC Planar MOSFETs With Built-In Reverse MOS-Channel Diode for Enhanced Performance. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2020, 8, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shen, Z.; Zhang, F.; Yan, G.; Wen, Z.; Zhao, W.; Wang, L.; Liu, X.; Sun, G.; Zeng, Y. High-Frequency Switching Properties and Low Oxide Electric Field and Energy Loss in a Reverse-Channel 4H-SiC UMOSFET. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2020, 67, 4046–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, H.; Wang, B.; Hu, B.; Kong, L.; Udrea, F.; Long, T. 4H-SiC Trench Gate Lateral MOSFET with Deep-Shallow Source Trench for Improved RESURF Dose Window and Reduced Oxide Field. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications in Europe (WiPDA Europe), Coventry, UK, 18–20 September 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, T.; Wang, Y.; Yue, R. SiC Trench MOSFET With Reduced Switching Loss and Increased Short-Circuit Capability. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2020, 67, 3685–3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, H.; Yang, Y.; Tan, J.; Zhu, H.; Sun, Q.-Q.; Zhang, D.W. Carrier Stored Trench-Gate Bipolar Transistor With Stepped Split Trench-Gate Structure. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2022, 69, 5450–5455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fu, H.; Wei, J.; Wei, Z.; Liu, S.; Ni, L.; Yang, Z.; Sun, W. Quasisaturation Effect and Optimization for 4H-SiC Trench MOSFET With P+ Shielding Region. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. 2021, 68, 4550–4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wei, J.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, H.; Wang, H.; Chen, K.J. Dynamic Degradation in SiC Trench MOSFET With a Floating p-Shield Revealed With Numerical Simulations. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 2592–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peters, D.; Aichinger, T.; Basler, T.; Bergner, W.; Kueck, D.; Esteve, R. 1200V SiC Trench-MOSFET optimized for high reliability and high performance. Mater. Sci. Forum 2016, 897, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiang, H.; Wei, J.; Dai, X.; Ke, M.; Deviny, I.; Mawby, P. SiC Trench MOSFET With Shielded Fin-Shaped Gate to Reduce Oxide Field and Switching Loss. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016, 37, 1324–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ding, R.; Dou, Z.; Qi, Y.; Mei, W.; Liu, G. Analysis on characteristic of 3.3-kV full SiC device and railway traction converter design. IET Power Electron. 2022, 15, 978–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, X.; Li, J.W.; Ding, Y.F.; Xu, M.W.; Zhu, X.F.; Zhu, J. Observation of Transient Parity-Time Symmetry in Electronic Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 06571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic structure of (a) the proposed SiC MOS and (b) conventional P+ shield trench SiC MOS.
Figure 1. Schematic structure of (a) the proposed SiC MOS and (b) conventional P+ shield trench SiC MOS.
Micromachines 16 00447 g001
Figure 2. One possible fabrication process for the proposed SiC MOSFET. (a) The N-drift is formed on the N+ substrate using epitaxial techniques, and then, the emitter P+N+ is formed by photolithography (PEP) and ion implantation (ion); (b) oxide deposition, PEP, oxide etching, and SiC etching to form a deep trench; (c) oxide deposition, etching to form side walls, and self-aligned bottom P-well injection; (d) annealing for ion activation and oxide etching; (e) oxide deposition and chemical mechanical polishing (CMP); (f) PEP and oxide etching; (g) SiC etching; (h) thermal oxidation process to form the gate oxide; (i) polysilicon deposition and etching; (j) oxide deposition; (k) PEP and oxide coating etching to form ground channels in the bottom of deep trench; (l) metal deposition.
Figure 2. One possible fabrication process for the proposed SiC MOSFET. (a) The N-drift is formed on the N+ substrate using epitaxial techniques, and then, the emitter P+N+ is formed by photolithography (PEP) and ion implantation (ion); (b) oxide deposition, PEP, oxide etching, and SiC etching to form a deep trench; (c) oxide deposition, etching to form side walls, and self-aligned bottom P-well injection; (d) annealing for ion activation and oxide etching; (e) oxide deposition and chemical mechanical polishing (CMP); (f) PEP and oxide etching; (g) SiC etching; (h) thermal oxidation process to form the gate oxide; (i) polysilicon deposition and etching; (j) oxide deposition; (k) PEP and oxide coating etching to form ground channels in the bottom of deep trench; (l) metal deposition.
Micromachines 16 00447 g002
Figure 3. (a) The OFF-state electric field distributions in the proposed device at VDS = 1320 V (deep trench depth 2.4 μm). (b) The OFF-state electric field distributions in the conventional device without P+ at VDS = 750 V. (c) Breakdown characteristic of the proposed device and conventional devices with and without P+, respectively. (d) Relationship between deep trench depth and BV of the proposed device.
Figure 3. (a) The OFF-state electric field distributions in the proposed device at VDS = 1320 V (deep trench depth 2.4 μm). (b) The OFF-state electric field distributions in the conventional device without P+ at VDS = 750 V. (c) Breakdown characteristic of the proposed device and conventional devices with and without P+, respectively. (d) Relationship between deep trench depth and BV of the proposed device.
Micromachines 16 00447 g003
Figure 4. (a) ON-state characteristics of the proposed device and conventional devices with and without P+, respectively. (b) BV–Ron trade-off relationship of the proposed device and conventional devices with and without P+. (c) Trade-off relationship between BV and Ron with different trench depth. (d) Cell layout design of distributed grounding method.
Figure 4. (a) ON-state characteristics of the proposed device and conventional devices with and without P+, respectively. (b) BV–Ron trade-off relationship of the proposed device and conventional devices with and without P+. (c) Trade-off relationship between BV and Ron with different trench depth. (d) Cell layout design of distributed grounding method.
Micromachines 16 00447 g004
Figure 5. (a) Capacitance distribution diagram; (b) gate charge of the proposed device and conventional devices with and without P+. The inserted picture shows the test circuit configuration.
Figure 5. (a) Capacitance distribution diagram; (b) gate charge of the proposed device and conventional devices with and without P+. The inserted picture shows the test circuit configuration.
Micromachines 16 00447 g005
Table 1. Key device parameters.
Table 1. Key device parameters.
ParameterProposedConventional
Gate oxide thickness (nm)5050
Trench gate depth D1 (μm)1.01.0
D2 (μm)1.2
N-JFET doping (cm−3) 4 × 10 16 4 × 10 16
N-drift doping (cm−3) 7 × 10 15 7 × 10 15
N-drift thickness (μm)1010
Cell pitch L1 (μm)2.42.4
Trench gate width L2 (μm)1.61.6
L3 (μm)0.3
Table 2. Comparison of performance parameters.
Table 2. Comparison of performance parameters.
ProposedCon with +PCon Without +P
Ron (mΩ·cm2)1.081.81.28
BV (V)12301100750
FoM (MW·cm2)1.40.6720.43
Qgd (nC/cm2)67330336
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cui, W.; Guo, J.; Xu, H.; Zhang, D.W. A High-Density 4H-SiC MOSFET Based on a Buried Field Limiting Ring with Low Qgd and Ron. Micromachines 2025, 16, 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16040447

AMA Style

Cui W, Guo J, Xu H, Zhang DW. A High-Density 4H-SiC MOSFET Based on a Buried Field Limiting Ring with Low Qgd and Ron. Micromachines. 2025; 16(4):447. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16040447

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cui, Wenrong, Jianbin Guo, Hang Xu, and David Wei Zhang. 2025. "A High-Density 4H-SiC MOSFET Based on a Buried Field Limiting Ring with Low Qgd and Ron" Micromachines 16, no. 4: 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16040447

APA Style

Cui, W., Guo, J., Xu, H., & Zhang, D. W. (2025). A High-Density 4H-SiC MOSFET Based on a Buried Field Limiting Ring with Low Qgd and Ron. Micromachines, 16(4), 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16040447

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop