Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Is Emodin with Anticancer Effects Completely Innocent? Two Sides of the Coin
Previous Article in Journal
A Collaborative Model to Implement Flexible, Accessible and Efficient Oncogenetic Services for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: The C-MOnGene Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multiple Myeloma Inhibitory Activity of Plant Natural Products
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Molecular Mechanisms of Antiproliferative Effects of Natural Chalcones

Cancers 2021, 13(11), 2730; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112730
by Radka Michalkova, Ladislav Mirossay, Maria Gazdova, Martin Kello and Jan Mojzis *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Cancers 2021, 13(11), 2730; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112730
Submission received: 28 April 2021 / Revised: 20 May 2021 / Accepted: 27 May 2021 / Published: 31 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Medicinal Plants and Their Active Ingredients in Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a robust review that is well-organized by category of the action of chalcones derivatives. This paper contains and summarizes many previously published studies. This paper shows the potential of natural chalcones as an antiproliferative agent. Therefore, I support its publication with minor comments.

 

  1. In the introduction, authors mentioned that anticancer agents induce severe organ toxicity and the natural compound has great interests. To support this, I would recommend that the information on the biosafety of natural chalcones compared to conventional anticancer drugs should be added.
  2. This paper introduces the diverse chalcone derivatives in Table 1. These molecules have various anticancer mechanisms depending on the type. Therefore, I recommend adding molecular structures to improve the utilization and understanding of these molecules.
  3. In the abbreviation section, some of the items don’t have space between abbreviation and original words.
  4. Line 215 “fytochemicals” should be “phytochemicals”
  5. endoplasmic reticulum in Line 241, 247, and 255 should be “ER” this abbreviation is in Line 238.
  6. Line 262 add original words of ROS.
  7. Line 525 add original words of MDM2 and then remove (mouse double minute 2) on line 526.
  8. Line 620 swap the positions of placental growth factor and PlGF.

Author Response

See attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

It is interesting topic. However the review should be partially rewrite. The review should be more condensed in information concern natural chalones and focus more on  impact of  natural chalcones on cellular process and  molecular mechanisms/ pathways , avoiding  long description of basic information, which easily can be find in many other reviews or books. The  authors should shortage some text  and instead cited review papers of other authors on, e.g. apoptosis or autophagy.  

Figures are impressive, but I do not see the sense of showing molecular pathways without relations to chalcones.  The figures should be removed or modified. I will expect to show in  each figure the impact of  chalcones, general or selected one, in the described processes, not just process itself.  

I will avoid classification of type of cell death to 1,2,3, since there are many others known, and all of them in lead to cell death. 

Author Response

See attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

no comments, very fine anad interesting

Author Response

See attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I have no further comments or suggestion.

Back to TopTop