Next Article in Journal
Clinical Activity of an hTERT-Specific Cancer Vaccine (Vx-001) in “Immune Desert” NSCLC
Next Article in Special Issue
Correction: Pakuła et al. Deciphering the Molecular Mechanism of Spontaneous Senescence in Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells. Cancers 2020, 12, 296
Previous Article in Journal
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Interactome with 364 Novel Protein-Protein Interactions
Previous Article in Special Issue
FOXM1 Inhibition in Ovarian Cancer Tissue Cultures Affects Individual Treatment Susceptibility Ex Vivo
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Molecular Biology of Ovarian Cancer: From Mechanisms of Intraperitoneal Metastasis to Therapeutic Opportunities

by
Krzysztof Książek
Department of Pathophysiology of Ageing and Civilization Diseases, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Długa 1/2 Str., 61-848 Poznań, Poland
Cancers 2021, 13(7), 1661; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071661
Submission received: 29 March 2021 / Accepted: 31 March 2021 / Published: 1 April 2021
Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most frequent malignancies of the female genital tract, and is still the leading cause of death from gynecological tumors [1]. Although the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer is well recognized, including the nature of initiating agents and mechanisms of primary and metastatic tumor development, some issues still hamper a full understanding of the complexity of this disease. These gaps may, at least partly, explain the outcomes of OC therapy, which are far from satisfactory. As a matter of fact, despite well-established algorithms of treatment [2,3], approximately 70% of ovarian cancer patients relapse within 2 years after primary cytoreduction and first-line chemotherapy [4]. Having all the above considerations in mind, prominent experts in OC pathobiology were invited to contribute to the Special Issue of Cancers devoted to molecular aspects of OC progression and therapy. The series consists of 11 excellent articles, including 9 original studies and 2 reviews.
One of the most significant findings regarding high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC), being one of the most frequent and aggressive OC histotypes [5], is that they originate from the fallopian tube [6]. The transformation of the fallopian tube epithelium (FTE), providing HGSOCs precursors, has previously been linked with the IGF-1R/AKT pathway, activated by constituents of ovulatory follicular fluid [7]. Simultaneously, molecular mechanisms of their transfer towards the ovaries and peritoneum are still a matter of investigation. A significant contribution to this research comes from the observations of Hsu and colleagues, who showed that the follicular fluid plays a causative role in the whole sequence of events leading from HGSOC formation to their intraperitoneal metastasis. Namely, the fluid supports a broad spectrum of aggressive behaviors of transformed FTE and HGSOCs, such as: migration, anchorage-independent growth, proliferation, invasion, peritoneal adhesion, and anoikis insensitivity [8].
HGSOCs were also among tissue and cellular OC models in the study of Batool et al., focused on the biological role of the CD83 molecule. The role of this glycoprotein, which exists in both membrane-bound and soluble forms and controls the reactivity of numerous immune cells [9], has never been tested with respect to OC properties and development. These authors addressed this challenge and demonstrated that CD83 hyperexpression promotes proliferation, colony formation, spheroid formation, and in vivo tumorigenicity of various representative OC cell lines, simultaneously limiting migration and invasion. The intensified cell growth and spheroidogenesis have been found to be mediated by CD83-dependent activation of MAP3K7-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 cascade, leading to the modulation of their downstream FOXO1/p21/CDK2/CCNB1 and STAT3/DKK1 signaling routes [10]. These studies portray the CD83 molecule as an essential regulator of OC progression, and a potential target for therapeutic interventions. The same conclusions may apply to the findings provided by Pakuła and co-workers, who described, as the first worldwide, that primary OC cells obtained from patients who had not received chemotherapy may undergo spontaneous, replicative senescence [11]. In this paper, the authors comprehensively describe the molecular mechanisms of OC cell senescence, and demonstrate that this process may be, at least partly, induced by normal peritoneal cells (mesothelium and fibroblasts), as well as by constituents of malignant ascites. Taking into account that cellular senescence is an example of a two-edged sword (limiting proliferation of a senescent cell but promoting, at the same time, the growth of its cancerous bystanders) [12], the biological and clinical significance of OC cell senescence remains to be explored.
Immunologic status of a tumor microenvironment is critical for both OC progression and its therapy [13]. According to the current knowledge, immune cells, e.g., tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells, modulate the survival of OC patients [14]. Westergaard et al. addressed the problem of the immune contexture in matched primary and recurrent OCs, and found that the disease progression is associated with the development of adaptive immune resistance. At the same time, they discovered that recurrent tumors display increased immune and stromal cell infiltration (e.g., cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, helper CD4+ T cells, tumor-associated macrophages) along with the expression of immune suppressive markers [15]. These findings indicate that more inflamed recurrent ovarian tumors seem to be vulnerable to immunotherapy, and genes shown to be upregulated, LAG3, HAVCR2, TIGIT, and CTLA4, could be taken into account as promising targets.
The importance of immune cells, specifically neutrophils, in the OC microenvironment was also tested by Muqaku and colleagues [16]. The foundation for this study was the conflicting information regarding the role (harmful vs. desirable) of these cells in OC progression [17,18]. The study revealed that neutrophils activity, marked by the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [19], is associated with the non-miliary spread of HGSOC, which is characterized by better overall survival, despite more invasive behavior (compared with the miliary type). Taking into account this clear contradiction, the authors of this report propose a scenario explaining the beneficial role of NETs in OC patients, which includes its initiation by peritoneal hypoxia, the establishment of distinct mascroscopic features related to a specific NET-related biomarker profile, and the modulation of the adaptive immune system by NET, which leads to improved overall survival [16].
Another element of the tumor microenvironment, apart from immune cells, are cancer stem cells. Importantly, they are usually therapy-resistant and responsible, at least to some extent, for OC relapse. In their study, Terraneo et al. show that the L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) is a new OC stem cell marker, responsible for tumor insensitivity to radiation and the high tumor-initiating capacity of the stem cells. These observations direct our attention to a specific population of OC-associated cells, namely L1CAM+/CD133+ cells, which may determine some tumor-promoting phenotypes and represent a target for novel therapeutic approaches in OC patients [20].
Some summary of the threads related to the importance of the tumor microenvironment in OC development is the review paper by Hassan et al., in which the role of selectins as mediators of OC cell adhesion to normal peritoneal cells is widely presented and discussed [21].
As per potential therapeutic solutions, van den Brand and colleagues show that epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)-directed designed ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins) combined with the photosensitizer IRDye 700DX may be attractive targets for photodynamic therapy in OC patients. Notably, employment of this modality resulted in a significant reduction of vitality within OC cell lines (OVCAR-3, OV90, SKOV-3), 3D tumor spheroids, and mice xenografts. The conjugates also expressed specific binding in primary patient samples [22]. Brückner et al. revealed, in turn, that the exposure of OC specimens to a transcription factor FOXM1 inhibitor (thiostrepton) and carboplatin or olaparib improves treatment response compared to single agent effects. The authors of this study also present their point of view that investigations of tumor survival using tissue cultures represent a more differentiated and comprehensive model than experiments based on conventional cell cultures [23]. A very intriguing therapeutic approach is also described in the study by Stump and collaborators, who provide a concept that resected and inactivated OC tissue could be used as a source of personalized vaccine antigen to create systemic antitumor immunity, preventing relapse. The study is focused on a mouse model to optimize the whole procedure. Cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) was used as an adjuvant in a prophylactic vaccine, and its co-delivery with irradiated ovarian cancer cells appeared to be an effective preventive vaccine against murine OC [24]. To conclude considerations regarding modern therapeutic options for OC patients, Yang and colleagues provide a review of the literature on the importance of obesity in the development and progression of the disease. In this context, the authors also refer to recent studies describing the importance of sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP1), a transcription factor controlling de novo lipogenesis and lipid homeostasis, and responsible for increased lipogenesis in cancer cells, as well as their elevated proliferation and metastasis [25].
Taken together, in this Special Issue, we were able to gather an exciting mix of articles dealing with either already opened or completely new avenues in OC research. As co-editor of this Special Issue, I am convinced that the publications contained herein will be of great interest to basic scientists and clinicians, translating into further development of the research threads described above. Personally, I note with great satisfaction the apparent increase in the proportion of research conducted using primary material from OC patients instead of established, permanent cell lines. This desirable trend should translate into a greater value of findings, from those obtained in the laboratory under in vitro conditions to the complex and individual-specific situation observed in human organisms in vivo.

Funding

Author of this article is supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, grant number 2017/25/B/NZ3/00122.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Schorge, J.O.; Clark, R.M.; Lee, S.I.; Penson, R.T. Primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: Are you a believer or a dissenter? Gynecol. Oncol. 2014, 135, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Marchetti, C.; Pisano, C.; Facchini, G.; Bruni, G.S.; Magazzino, F.P.; Losito, S.; Pignata, S. First-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: Current research and perspectives. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2010, 10, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: The ICON3 randomised trial. Lancet 2002, 360, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lisio, M.A.; Fu, L.; Goyeneche, A.; Gao, Z.H.; Telleria, C. High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Basic Sciences, Clinical and Therapeutic Standpoints. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ducie, J.; Dao, F.; Considine, M.; Olvera, N.; Shaw, P.A.; Kurman, R.J.; Shih, I.M.; Soslow, R.A.; Cope, L.; Levine, D.A. Molecular analysis of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with and without associated serous tubal intra-epithelial carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hsu, C.F.; Huang, H.S.; Chen, P.C.; Ding, D.C.; Chu, T.Y. IGF-axis confers transformation and regeneration of fallopian tube fimbria epithelium upon ovulation. EBioMedicine 2019, 41, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hsu, C.F.; Chen, P.C.; Seenan, V.; Ding, D.C.; Chu, T.Y. Ovulatory Follicular Fluid Facilitates the Full Transformation Process for the Development of High-Grade Serous Carcinoma. Cancers 2021, 13, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grosche, L.; Knippertz, I.; Konig, C.; Royzman, D.; Wild, A.B.; Zinser, E.; Sticht, H.; Muller, Y.A.; Steinkasserer, A.; Lechmann, M. The CD83 Molecule—An Important Immune Checkpoint. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Batool, A.; Liu, H.; Liu, Y.X.; Chen, S.R. CD83, a Novel MAPK Signaling Pathway Interactor, Determines Ovarian Cancer Cell Fate. Cancers 2020, 12, 2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pakula, M.; Maly, E.; Uruski, P.; Witucka, A.; Bogucka, M.; Jaroszewska, N.; Makowska, N.; Niklas, A.; Moszynski, R.; Sajdak, S.; et al. Deciphering the Molecular Mechanism of Spontaneous Senescence in Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells. Cancers 2020, 12, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Mikula-Pietrasik, J.; Niklas, A.; Uruski, P.; Tykarski, A.; Ksiazek, K. Mechanisms and significance of therapy-induced and spontaneous senescence of cancer cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2020, 77, 213–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Baci, D.; Bosi, A.; Gallazzi, M.; Rizzi, M.; Noonan, D.M.; Poggi, A.; Bruno, A.; Mortara, L. The Ovarian Cancer Tumor Immune Microenvironment (TIME) as Target for Therapy: A Focus on Innate Immunity Cells as Therapeutic Effectors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sato, E.; Olson, S.H.; Ahn, J.; Bundy, B.; Nishikawa, H.; Qian, F.; Jungbluth, A.A.; Frosina, D.; Gnjatic, S.; Ambrosone, C.; et al. Intraepithelial CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high CD8+/regulatory T cell ratio are associated with favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 18538–18543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Westergaard, M.C.W.; Milne, K.; Pedersen, M.; Hasselager, T.; Olsen, L.R.; Anglesio, M.S.; Borch, T.H.; Kennedy, M.; Briggs, G.; Ledoux, S.; et al. Changes in the Tumor Immune Microenvironment during Disease Progression in Patients with Ovarian Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 3828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Muqaku, B.; Pils, D.; Mader, J.C.; Aust, S.; Mangold, A.; Muqaku, L.; Slany, A.; Del Favero, G.; Gerner, C. Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation Correlates with Favorable Overall Survival in High Grade Ovarian Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lee, W.; Ko, S.Y.; Mohamed, M.S.; Kenny, H.A.; Lengyel, E.; Naora, H. Neutrophils facilitate ovarian cancer premetastatic niche formation in the omentum. J. Exp. Med. 2019, 216, 176–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yoshida, M.; Taguchi, A.; Kawana, K.; Ogishima, J.; Adachi, K.; Kawata, A.; Nakamura, H.; Sato, M.; Fujimoto, A.; Inoue, T.; et al. Intraperitoneal neutrophils activated by KRAS-induced ovarian cancer exert antitumor effects by modulating adaptive immunity. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 53, 1580–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, T.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Dong, G.; Zhang, M.; Xu, Z.; Yang, J. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps: Signaling Properties and Disease Relevance. Mediat. Inflamm. 2020, 2020, 9254087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Terraneo, N.; Jacob, F.; Peitzsch, C.; Dubrovska, A.; Krudewig, C.; Huang, Y.L.; Heinzelmann-Schwarz, V.; Schibli, R.; Behe, M.; Grunberg, J. L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule Confers Radioresistance to Ovarian Cancer and Defines a New Cancer Stem Cell Population. Cancers 2020, 12, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hassan, A.A.; Artemenko, M.; Tang, M.K.S.; Wong, A.S.T. Selectins: An Important Family of Glycan-Binding Cell Adhesion Molecules in Ovarian Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Van den Brand, D.; van Lith, S.A.M.; de Jong, J.M.; Gorris, M.A.J.; Palacio-Castaneda, V.; Couwenbergh, S.T.; Goldman, M.R.G.; Ebisch, I.; Massuger, L.F.; Leenders, W.P.J.; et al. EpCAM-Binding DARPins for Targeted Photodynamic Therapy of Ovarian Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bruckner, L.; Reinshagen, A.; Hoang, N.A.; Hohn, A.K.; Lordick, F.; Bechmann, I.; Aktas, B.; Nel, I.; Kallendrusch, S. FOXM1 Inhibition in Ovarian Cancer Tissue Cultures Affects Individual Treatment Susceptibility Ex Vivo. Cancers 2021, 13, 956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Stump, C.T.; Ho, G.; Mao, C.; Veliz, F.A.; Beiss, V.; Fields, J.; Steinmetz, N.F.; Fiering, S. Remission-Stage Ovarian Cancer Cell Vaccine with Cowpea Mosaic Virus Adjuvant Prevents Tumor Growth. Cancers 2021, 13, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, J.; Stack, M.S. Lipid Regulatory Proteins as Potential Therapeutic Targets for Ovarian Cancer in Obese Women. Cancers 2020, 12, 3469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Książek, K. Molecular Biology of Ovarian Cancer: From Mechanisms of Intraperitoneal Metastasis to Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers 2021, 13, 1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071661

AMA Style

Książek K. Molecular Biology of Ovarian Cancer: From Mechanisms of Intraperitoneal Metastasis to Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers. 2021; 13(7):1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071661

Chicago/Turabian Style

Książek, Krzysztof. 2021. "Molecular Biology of Ovarian Cancer: From Mechanisms of Intraperitoneal Metastasis to Therapeutic Opportunities" Cancers 13, no. 7: 1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071661

APA Style

Książek, K. (2021). Molecular Biology of Ovarian Cancer: From Mechanisms of Intraperitoneal Metastasis to Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers, 13(7), 1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071661

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop