Next Article in Journal
Tumor-Associated Regulatory T Cell Expression of LAIR2 Is Prognostic in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Comprehensive Analysis of the Prognosis and Drug Sensitivity of Differentiation-Related lncRNAs in Papillary Thyroid Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
A Promising Treatment Strategy for Lung Cancer: A Combination of Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advances in Biomarker-Driven Targeted Therapies in Thyroid Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Emerging Biomarkers in Thyroid Practice and Research

1
Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110608, India
2
Department of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa 296-8602, Chiba, Japan
3
Department of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
4
Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(1), 204; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010204
Submission received: 3 December 2021 / Revised: 17 December 2021 / Accepted: 29 December 2021 / Published: 31 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers of Thyroid Cancer)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Tumor biomarkers are molecules at genetic or protein level, or certain evaluable characteristics. These help in perfecting patient management. Over the past decade, advanced and more sensitive techniques have led to the identification of many new biomarkers in the field of oncology. A knowledge of the recent developments is essential for their application to clinical practice, and furthering research. This review provides a comprehensive account of such various markers identified in thyroid carcinoma, the most common endocrine malignancy. While some of these have been brought into use in routine patient management, others are novel and need more research before clinical application.

Abstract

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy. Recent developments in molecular biological techniques have led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis and clinical behavior of thyroid neoplasms. This has culminated in the updating of thyroid tumor classification, including the re-categorization of existing and introduction of new entities. In this review, we discuss various molecular biomarkers possessing diagnostic, prognostic, predictive and therapeutic roles in thyroid cancer. A comprehensive account of epigenetic dysregulation, including DNA methylation, the function of various microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs, germline mutations determining familial occurrence of medullary and non-medullary thyroid carcinoma, and single nucleotide polymorphisms predisposed to thyroid tumorigenesis has been provided. In addition to novel immunohistochemical markers, including those for neuroendocrine differentiation, and next-generation immunohistochemistry (BRAF V600E, RAS, TRK, and ALK), the relevance of well-established markers, such as Ki-67, in current clinical practice has also been discussed. A tumor microenvironment (PD-L1, CD markers) and its influence in predicting responses to immunotherapy in thyroid cancer and the expanding arena of techniques, including liquid biopsy based on circulating nucleic acids and plasma-derived exosomes as a non-invasive technique for patient management, are also summarized.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Thyroid nodules are common in the general population, with a higher prevalence noted in women and the older age group. While palpable thyroid nodules account for less than 10% of the adult population, high-resolution ultrasound can detect subcentimeter nodules and clinically silent nodules, increasing the prevalence to about 70% [1,2]. Although the vast majority of thyroid nodules are non-neoplastic, 5–25% of thyroid nodules are true neoplasms [3,4].
The spectrum of thyroid neoplasms ranges from benign follicular adenoma (FA) to low-risk neoplasms with borderline or uncertain behavior to malignancies [5]. Low-risk neoplasms include non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP), thyroid tumors of uncertain malignant potential, and hyalinizing trabecular tumors. Of the malignant thyroid tumors of a follicular cell origin, differentiated thyroid carcinomas (DTCs) include papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs), comprising 80–90% of cases; follicular thyroid carcinomas (FTCs); oncocytic (Hürthle cell) carcinomas (OCAs); and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas (PDTCs). Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is an undifferentiated malignancy of follicular thyroid cell origin, showing one of the most aggressive clinical behaviors among human cancers. Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) originates from parafollicular C cells producing calcitonin.
As thyroid cancers encompass a broad gamut of tumors differing in their molecular, histologic features and clinical behavior, there is a need for identifying robust biomarkers for accurate diagnosis and management. Such markers will also be helpful in improving the preoperative categorization of thyroid nodules, 15–30% of which remain diagnostically challenging to fine needle aspiration (FNA) specimens [6].
Cancer biomarkers can be genetic materials, proteins, chemical modifications and characteristics that can be measured through clinical, pathological, radiological and other features. Recent and continuing developments, including the use of high-throughput technologies, have led to the identification of many new biomarkers in the field of thyroid cancer. These not only aid in accurate and, in some cases, early diagnosis, but also provide useful information in guiding clinical decision-making in patients with thyroid cancer. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the recent advances in genetic and epigenetic alterations and protein expression as biomarkers for thyroid neoplasms.

2. Molecular Landscape of Follicular Cell-Derived Thyroid Cancer

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) study identified oncogenic driver alterations for 96.5% of studied PTC cases [7]. Most genetic alterations occurred in a limited number of genes and led to a low mutation burden, compared to other carcinomas. These alterations frequently occur in a mutually exclusive manner. The most frequent oncogenic alteration in PTC was BRAF V600E (60%), followed by NRAS mutations (8.5%) and RET gene fusions (6.3%). Other genetic alterations found in less than 5% of cases include mutations of HRAS, KRAS, EIF1AX, PPM1D, CHEK2, ARID1B, PTEN and, TP53, and gene fusions of BRAF, PPARG, NTRK1, NTRK3, ALK, and THADA (Figure 1).
In the TCGA cohort, PTCs were classified into 2 molecular subtypes based on a 71-gene expression signature: BRAF V600E-like and RAS-like PTCs. The molecular subtype of PTCs can be further subclassified into three groups (BRAF-like, RAS-like, and non-BRAF/non-RAS) [8]. The non-BRAF/non-RAS subtype was associated with less aggressive thyroid cancer, with a follicular growth pattern and mutations of EIF1A, PTEN, DICER1, EZH1, SOS1, IDH1, and SPOP, PPARG fusion, and THADA fusion [8]. The immune-related metagene signature representing expression levels of immune-related genes categorized the canonical BRAF V600E-like and RAS-like PTCs into four groups (BRAF-like immunodeficient, BRAF-like immunoreactive, RAS-like immunodeficient, and RAS-like immunoreactive) [9]. In patients with PTC, the BRAF-like immunoreactive subtype was associated with tall cell variants and worst prognosis, while the RAS-like immunodeficient subtype was enriched in follicular variant tumors [9].
The most frequent mutation detected in FA and FTC occurs in RAS genes (NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS), followed by mutations of DICER1, EZH1, EIF1AX, PTEN, IDH1, and SPOP, and PPARG gene fusion (Figure 1) [8]. There is no significant difference in the mutation profiles between FA and FTC [8,10]. Nodular hyperplasia (NH) morphologically mimics FA, and the two can be difficult to differentiate. However, a growing number of reports have documented RAS mutations in NH [11,12,13]. A recent publication implicated additional alterations in the expressions of genes involved in cell cycle, apoptosis, and PI3K pathway, and stromal factors to lead to a stepwise progression of NH to malignancy [12].
Compared to DTC, PDTC and ATC have a higher tumor mutation burden and a higher frequency of mutations involving TERT promoter; tumor-suppressor genes, including TP53; PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway genes; cell-cycle genes, including CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and CCNE1; and genes associated with SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeling and histone modification (Figure 1) [14,15]. The progression of DTC to a more aggressive form, PDTC, and ATC is associated with the accumulation of mutations in various genes (Figure 2) [15].

2.1. Recently Discovered Molecular Alterations in Thyroid Cancer

2.1.1. Recurrent Promoter Mutations in Thyroid Cancer

Whole-genome sequencing of thyroid tumors has identified recurrent driver mutations in non-coding regulatory regions, such as gene promoters. Two hotspot mutations in the TERT promoter region at chr. 5:1,295,228 (C228T mutation) and 1,295,250 (C250T mutation) were found to be associated with tumor progression and poor clinical outcomes of thyroid cancer. TERT promoter mutations occur in 10–20% of DTC, 40% of PDTC, and 65% of ATC [14,15,16].
Two hotspot mutations in the PLEKHS1 promoter region at chr. 10: 115,511,590 (G590A mutation) and chr. 10: 115,511,593 (C593T), occurred in 10% of DTC with distant metastasis and were proposed as genetic markers of aggressive DTC [16].

2.1.2. ALK

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene translocations have been implicated as pathogenic events in a proportion of PTC (0–9%), PDTC (0–4%), and ATC (0–4%) [7,17,18,19], with some reports indicating a greater prevalence in dedifferentiated thyroid cancers [17]. Common reported fusion partners include EML4 and STRN, others being TFG, GTF2IRD1, and CCDC149 [19].
ALK translocations appear to be more frequent post-radiation [20], in female PTC patients [19,21], have been variably reported in the pediatric age group [22], and occur independently of other known driver molecular alterations in thyroid cancers [17,21].
In addition to translocations, ALK mutations have also been reported in 11–20% of ATC [23,24], and can be associated with NF1 and/or TP53 mutations [23].
Another tumor linked with ALK gene fusions and rarely reported in the thyroid gland is the inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor [25].
Both translocations and mutations result in an enhanced activity of ALK kinase, which can be detected by ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) [20,21], and is amenable to inhibition by ALK inhibitors, such as crizotinib [17].

2.1.3. NTRK

Various fusion proteins formed, due to translocations involving any of the neurotrophic-tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) genes (NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3) with other genes, is a known oncogenic event in many tumors. These are located, respectively, on chromosomes 1q23.1, 9q21.33, and 15q25.3, and encode the transmembrane receptor proteins TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC. NTRK1 and NTRK3 are the genes usually involved. The reported oncogenic fusion partners in thyroid tumors include PPL, EML4, ETV6, IRF2BP2, TPR, TPM3, TFG, TRIM33, RBPMS, SQSTM1, and ERC1. NTRK rearrangements lead to the constitutive activation of the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain of the receptor. This causes cellular proliferation and tumorigenesis following uncontrolled downstream pathway activation. TrkA activates the MAPK pathway, TrkB the Ras-ERK, PIK3, and PLC-gamma pathways, and TrkC the PI3/AKT pathway [26].
While more frequent in other solid tumors, in the thyroid, these rearrangements are observed in about 2.3% of the sporadic adult-onset carcinomas [27,28,29], with higher frequencies reported in post-radiation exposure (3–15%) [30,31] and in the pediatric age group (2–26%) [22,32].
NTRK rearrangements have been associated with PTC and rarely with primary thyroid secretory carcinomas [33]. These PTCs can show a multinodular infiltrative growth pattern, or a predominant follicular pattern variably admixed with papillae, or the solid growth pattern [33,34]. Variably reported features include glomeruloid structures, focal cytoplasmic clearing, and reverse nuclear polarity [27,34]. NTRK-rearranged thyroid carcinomas often show extensive lymphovascular invasion, extrathyroidal extension, and lymph node metastases. Although they can develop distant metastases, mortality rates are low [33,34].
TRK inhibitors entrectinib and larotrectinib, have been approved by the United States Food and Drug administration (FDA) for use in patients with solid tumors harboring NTRK fusions [35].
NTRK rearrangements can be detected by various molecular techniques, including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), next generation sequencing (NGS), and IHC, all with their respective advantages and shortfalls [26].

2.1.4. DICER1

DICER1 is a highly conserved RNaseIII endoribonuclease, involved in the synthesis of microRNAs (miRNAs) and short interfering RNAs (siRNAs); therefore, it has a critical role in post-transcriptional gene silencing [36]. Loss of function mutations of the DICER1 gene have an oncogenic effect, with a particular predisposition to childhood-onset tumors [37]. Germline mutation leads to an autosomal-dominant disorder, the DICER1 syndrome. A second somatic mutation in these patients is linked with a wide spectrum of benign and malignant lesions involving various organ systems, the most frequent being pleuropulmonary blastoma, multinodular goiter (MNG), cystic nephroma, and ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors [38].
Most patients are female carriers in the age group of 10 to 30 years [38]. In a recent study, 75% of women and 17% of men with DICER1 syndrome developed MNG or underwent thyroidectomy by 40 years of age [39]. It has been proposed that germline DICER1 mutations are predisposed to thyroid follicular cell hyperplasia and the subsequent acquisition of one or more somatic RNase IIIb mutations results in the development of multiple thyroid nodules and MNG [40]. DICER1 syndrome should be suspected if MNG occurs in childhood, in a patient with an ovarian Sertoli –Leydig cell tumor or when familial [41,42].
It also increases the risk of thyroid cancer by 16- to 24-fold [39]. It has been suggested that DTC develops in DICER1 variant carriers, following a stepwise acquisition of mutations involving somatic mutations of DICER1 and additional molecular events, distinct from the pathways observed in PTC and FTC [38,43]. A recent study found that about 50% of pediatric FTCs had DICER1 mutations [44]. The mutation rate in pediatric PTC is 10%, compared to approximately 0.5% in adults [45]. DICER1 alterations are, hence, driver mutations in at least a proportion of adolescent-onset benign and malignant thyroid tumors [37,45]. Most of the thyroid cancers reported, to date, have been low-risk malignancies, particularly the follicular variant of PTC and FTC [39]. An association has also been found with macrofollicular patterned neoplasms [46]. Some recent publications, in which the NGS platform was used, documented somatic DICER1 mutations in OCA, and the aggressive subtypes of thyroid cancers PDTC and ATC [47,48].
For surveillance purposes, major and minor indications for considering germline DICER1 genetic testing have been recently proposed. MNG or DTC, in two or more first-degree relatives, or in an index case with a family history consistent with DICER1 syndrome, is a major indication, as is a case of childhood-onset MNG or DTC [49].
An aggressive tumor linked with DICER1 mutation, but not with DICER1 syndrome, is malignant teratoma of the thyroid gland, and the term “thyroblastoma” has been proposed for this entity [50,51].

2.1.5. PTEN

Phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten (PTEN) is a tumor suppressor gene located at chromosome 10q23.3. PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome is an autosomal dominant tumor susceptibility syndrome, resulting from heterozygous germline pathogenic variants of PTEN. It encompasses multiple disorders, including Cowden syndrome, Bannayan–Riley–Ruvalcaba syndrome, PTEN-related Proteus syndrome, and PTEN-related Proteus-like syndrome. Clinical features include neurological disorders, multifocal hamartomas, and lifetime predilection, to develop malignancies in various organ systems (Cowden syndrome) [49,52,53].
Patients with PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome, develop both benign and malignant thyroid lesions at a higher frequency than in the general population. Multiple pathologies can be present in the same thyroidectomy specimen, such as multiple FA [54], and MNG in a background of thyroiditis [55,56]. While FTC is one of the major criteria recommended by NCCN for the diagnosis of PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome, PTC or its follicular variant and other thyroid structural lesions, such as adenoma, and MNG are included among the minor criteria [52].
Thyroid tumors can also harbor sporadic PTEN inactivation, secondary to deletion, mutation, or promoter methylation [57,58,59,60]. In a recent study, of the three evaluated PTC subtypes/variants, classical, follicular, and tall cell, the loss of PTEN protein immunoexpression was reported to be more frequent in the follicular variant [58].

2.1.6. GLIS

The GLISimilar (GLIS) proteins (1–3) are a family of the GLI-similar zinc finger transcription factors, which act as transcriptional activators and repressors. While the physiological role of GLIS1 in thyroid cells is not well established, GLIS3 regulates thyroid gland development [61] and thyroid hormone synthesis [62,63]. Interchromosomal rearrangements involving GLIS3, located on chromosome 9p24.2 and less commonly GLIS1 on chromosome 1p32.3, are pathognomonic of the hyalinizing trabecular tumor (HTT) of the thyroid [64,65]. There is the juxtaposition of exon 3 of GLIS3 or exon 2 of GLIS1 downstream of exon 2 of PAX8 on chromosome 2q14.1, placing their zinc-finger containing DNA-binding domains under the regulation of PAX8 promoter [65], and resulting in the constitutive activation of GLIS. Further downstream pathways that lead to HTT tumorigenesis have not been completely established, although there is limited evidence implicating the activation of the Sonic Hedgehog pathway [66], and the upregulation of extracellular matrix-related genes [65].
Recently, GLIS3 protein overexpression has been demonstrated to be detectable by IHC, appearing as combined nuclear and cytoplasmic positivity [65].

2.1.7. EIF1AX

Eukaryotic initiation factor 1A, X-linked (EIF1AX), is essential for the initiation of the translation process. Its role as a pathogenetic event in thyroid tumor genesis was first demonstrated by TCGA study, whereby EIF1AX mutations were found in 1.5% of PTC lacking any other known driver mutations [7]. EIF1AX alterations have been reported in thyroid lesions, other than PTC, including FTC, PDTC, ATC, and FA, and in the hyperplastic thyroid nodule (limited evidence in benign lesions) [14,67,68]. The reported prevalence for EIF1AX mutations has ranged from 0.3% [69] to 2.3% [68] in PTC, 0–5.1% in FTC [68,70], 11–22% in PDTC [14,71], and 9–14% in ATC [14,67].
Interestingly, EIF1AX mutations have been found to co-occur with RAS mutations in PDTC and ATC [14,67,71,72], but not with BRAF or TERT promoter mutations [14,67]. Functional studies have shown that the EIF1AX-A113 splice site mutation, which is the most frequent, via the induction of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), inhibits phosphorylation of EIF2α, increasing protein synthesis. ATF4, along with c-MYC, the latter stabilized by RAS, sensitizes mTOR to the amino acid supply, thus increasing therapeutic susceptibility to MEK, BRD4, and mTOR kinase inhibitors [72].

2.2. Epigenetics

Major epigenetic mechanisms that deregulate gene expression and can contribute to carcinogenesis, include DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNA species. The latter are represented by microRNAs (miRNA) and long non-coding RNAs.

2.2.1. DNA Methylation

The aberrant DNA methylation of promoters and enhancers affects gene expression. Hypermethylation can lead to the silencing of tumor suppressor genes, leading to carcinogenesis; common examples in thyroid cancer include Ras association domain family 1; isoform A (RASSF1A); cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A or P16INK4A); death-associated protein kinase1 (DAPK); tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP3); SLC5A8; SLC5A5; thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR); PTEN; retinoic acid receptor β2 (RARβ2); RAP1 GTPase activating protein (RAP1GAP); and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 [73,74,75,76]. Targeted methylation analysis showed that PTC is more likely to exhibit hypomethylation than hypermethylation, compared with a normal thyroid; this is contrasted to FTC, which displays more hypermethylations than hypomethylations [76,77]. However, an evaluation of the global methylation status found that hypermethylation was detected in all well-differentiated thyroid neoplasms (FA, FTC, and PTC), compared to the adjacent non-neoplastic thyroid tissue [78].
Hypomethylation of cytosine-guanine dinucleotides (CpG) islands, located in the promoter of MMP7 and in the gene bodies of MICAL2 and DIAPH1, have been suggested to be helpful in the differential diagnosis of non-malignant thyroid tumors from DTC. In PTC, the hypomethylation of these markers has also been associated with BRAF V600E mutation, lymph node metastasis, extrathyroidal extension, distant metastasis, and recurrent/persistent disease [77].
Protein expression of thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), a commonly used immunohistochemical marker for thyroid cell differentiation, is often absent in ATC, unlike DTC. The loss in expression has been explained by the DNA methylation and histone H3 modification of the gene encoding TTF-1, NK2 homeobox 1 (NKX2-1) [73,74].
Demethylating drugs are currently under evaluation, for their utility in the management of thyroid cancer patients who are refractory to radioactive iodine (RAI). They inhibit DNA methyl transferases, leading to the reactivation of silenced genes. The specific mechanisms of action in thyroid cancer include the restoration of the expression of sodium/iodide symporter, and thus of RAI uptake [75].
The role of histone modifications in thyroid carcinogenesis has also been evaluated, but to a limited extent. Their importance is highlighted by the utility of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors in improving the uptake of RAI in ATC. Histone modification acts by multiple mechanisms in thyroid carcinogenesis; for example, the repression of expression of paired-box gene 8 (PAX8), a thyroid-specific transcription factor, induction of loss of cell cycle regulation, and dedifferentiation [74].
Another epigenetic event implicated in aggressive thyroid carcinomas is chromatin remodeling via mutations in the Switch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) complex [74].

2.2.2. MicroRNA

MicroRNAs (miRNA) are small non-coding RNAs involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. In pathological conditions, in addition to playing a role in pathogenesis, they act as biomarkers for diagnostics, prognostication, and for the follow-up of patients with malignancies, including thyroid cancer. Circulating levels of miRNAs, in addition, provide a non-invasive tool [79].
The miRNAs that have been shown to be consistently upregulated in PTC tissues, when compared with non-neoplastic thyroid, include miR-21, miR-127, miR-136, miR-146b, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-181b [79,80,81,82,83]. MicroRNAs miR-221 and miR-222 negatively regulate p27 protein, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and a cell-cycle regulator [84]. Similarly, miR-146b and miR-181b target the tumor suppressor genes, retinoic acid receptor beta, and CYLD, respectively [85,86]. Importantly, in the PTC series, the overexpression of miR-221, miR-222, and miR-146b has been associated with adverse clinicopathological features, such as extrathyroidal invasion, lymph node and distant metastasis, advanced disease stage, recurrence, and BRAF V600E mutation [82]. The upregulation of miR-136, miR-21, and miR-127 was associated with distant metastases and recurrent/persistent disease in DTC [83]. Moreover, there is evidence suggesting the downregulation of expression of certain miRNAs in PTC. These include miR-145, miR-451, miR-613, and miR-137 [82].
Limited data is available regarding the miRNA expression profiling of FTC. Similar to PTC, miR-146b and miR-221 have been found to be upregulated in FTC [87]. A study analyzing miRNA expression in FTC and OCA, reported the upregulation of miR-182, miR-183, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-125a-3p, and the downregulation of miR-542-5p, miR-574-3p, miR-455, and miR-199a in both, when compared to normal thyroid tissue. The authors also documented miR-885-5p to be upregulated in OCA, but not in FTC [88]. The miRNA miR-199a-5p, suppresses the function of the connective tissue growth factor in FTC, thus acting as a tumor suppressor [89]. Sparse data exists on the prognostic role of miRNAs in FTC. Metastatic FTCs and widely invasive FTCs have been shown to be more likely to have higher levels of miR-221-3p, miR-222-3p, miR222-5p, miR-10b, and miR-92a. Furthermore, limited data suggests miR-10b to be a potential tool for predicting the metastatic potential of minimally invasive FTC [90].
As seen in DTC, ATC too shows the upregulated expression of miR-146b, miR-221, and miR-222. In contrast, the downregulation of miRNAs of miR-200 (miR-200a, miR-200b, and miR-200c) and miR-30 (miR-30a, miR-30b, miR-30c, miR-30d, and miR-30e) families is specific for ATC. Both these miRNAs regulate the epithelial–mesenchymal transition [82,91].
MTC also shows an aberrant expression of multiple miRNAs. Of note, the increased expression of miR-21, miR-183, and miR-375 has been associated with poor clinical outcomes, in terms of lymph node and distant metastasis, residual disease, advanced tumor stage, and mortality [92,93,94].
The thyroid miRNA classifier (ThyraMIR) is a commercial molecular diagnostic test for indeterminate thyroid cytology results to rule in all types of thyroid cancers, based upon the relative expression of 10 miRNAs: miR-222-3p, miR-146b-5p, miR-375, miR-29b-1-5p, miR-31-5p, miR-138-1-3p, miR-139-5p, miR-155, miR-204-5p, and miR-551b-3p [95].

2.2.3. lncRNA

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are typically smaller than mRNA, but greater than 200 nucleotides in length and do not code for proteins. Long non-coding RNAs epigenetically regulate the expression of genes involved in cell cycle, cell differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion. Consequent to the alteration of their expression, they can act as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. Similar to miRNAs, lncRNAs are potential diagnostic and prognostic cancer markers, as well as therapeutic targets. They can be measured both in tissues and in blood.
Recent studies have established that deregulation of lncRNAs contributes to thyroid cancer development and behavior. While some of them act as tumor suppressors (including, GAS8-AS1, LINC00271, LINC003121, MEG3, NAMA, NONHSAG007951, NONHSAG018271, NONHSAT037832, and PTCSC1/2/3), others act as oncogenes (namely, ANRIL, BANCR, ENST00000537266, ENST00000426615, FAL1, H19, HIT000218960, LOC100507661, MALAT1, NONHSAT076747, NR_036575.1, and PVT1). In PTC, the deregulation of lncRNAs has been correlated with BRAF V600E mutation (BANCR, ENSG00000230498.1, ENSG00000273132.1, LOC100507661, NAMA, XLOC_006074, and XLOC_051122), determining clinical aggressiveness (ANRIL, ATB, BANCR, CASC2, CTD-3193013, ENSG00000415582, ENSG00000462717, FAL1, GAS5, H19, HIT000218960, HOTAIR, HOXD-AS1, LINC00271, LOC100507661, MALAT1, NONHSAT076747 and NONHSAT122730, NONHSAT037832, NONHSAT076754, NR_036575.1, PANDAR, PVT1, RP5-1024C24.1, RP11-40216.1, TCONS-00024700, XLOC_006074, and XLOC_051122), and RAI resistance (ENSG00000415582, ENSG00000462717, MEG3, NEAT1, and NR-028494) [96,97,98,99].
Similar to PTCs, though limited, there is published data documenting deregulation and the role of lncRNAs in FTC, PDTC, ATC, and MTC [96,97,98,99].

2.3. Familial Thyroid Cancer

Familial cancer is defined as one in which at least three first degree relatives are affected. It occurs due to an inherited mutation [100]. In the case of the thyroid, familial cancers usually occur at a younger age, and have been reported to be more aggressive than sporadic, with a higher risk of lymph node metastasis and extrathyroidal extension [101,102]. Familial thyroid tumors are more often encountered among MTC; therefore, they are broadly divided into familial non-MTC (follicular cell-derived) thyroid lesions and familial MTC (Table 1).
Of the patients with a DTC, 5% have familial disease [101]. Familial follicular cell-derived tumors can occur as part of a syndrome primarily associated with non-thyroidal tumors, namely familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Gardner syndrome (a form of FAP), Cowden disease, Carney complex, Werner syndrome, Pendred syndrome, multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 (MEN 1), multiple endocrine neoplasia 2A (MEN 2A), Peutz–Jeghers syndrome, and DICER1 syndrome. Thyroid lesions that can develop in these familial cancer syndromes include nodular hyperplasia, FA, PTC (classic or follicular variant), FTC, and ATC. The cribriform-morular variant of PTC is typical of FAP and Gardner syndromes [101,102].
A second group of syndromes also exists, in which thyroid lesions are the primary manifestation [101]. These include familial follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma syndromes. These are not well characterized, but include familial PTC, a subset of which is associated with adenomatous nodules or papillary renal neoplasms, or shows prominent oxyphilia, or can be indistinguishable from classical PTC [101].
About 10–20% of MTC are familial [102] and the syndromes associated include Sipple’s syndrome (MEN 2 or 2A), MEN 2B, and familial MTC. Associated C cell hyperplasia on histopathology and RET gene mutations are characteristic [105].

2.4. Predisposition to Thyroid Cancer

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is, by definition, a variation that occurs within a single nucleotide of the DNA sequence, and which is identified in at least 1% of the population. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) performed either at specific gene or at the whole genome level, identify SNPs associated with a certain disease. This has opened a new avenue for identifying genetic loci linked with cancers and other diseases. SNPs are, thus, markers of increased genetic susceptibility on a population level [106].
In thyroid, SNPs documented to be associated with DTC include rs1867277 (FOXE1 or TTF 2), rs966423 (DIRC3), rs11693806 (DIRC3), rs12990503 (DIRC3), rs2439302 (NRG1), rs6996585 (NRG1), rs12542743 (NRG1), rs965513 (FOXE1), rs1867277 (FOXE1), rs72753537 (FOXE1), rs944289 (NKX2-1), rs34081947 (NKX2-1), rs116909374 (MBIP1), rs12129938 (PCNXL2), rs4649295 (PCNXL2), rs6793295 (LRRC34), s10069690 (TERT), rs73227498 (EPB41L4A), rs7902587 (OBFC1), rs2289261 (SMAD3), rs368187 (LOC105370452), rs1588635 (PTCSC2), and rs2466076 (NRG1) [107,108]; most of the data being derived from studies undertaken on European cohorts. While some of these SNPs have also been found to be associated with DTC in studies based on populations of a Korean, Chinese, and Japanese origin [109,110,111], other SNPs found in the Korean population include rs11175834 (MSRB3), rs4915076 (VAV3), rs1874564 (SEPT11), rs9858271 (FHIT), rs7248104 (INSR), and rs16934253 (SLC24A6) [107]. Interestingly, predisposing genetic factors documented by SNPs can be partly common for both benign and malignant follicular epithelium-derived thyroid tumors [112].
Genetic susceptibility has also been found for radiation-linked DTC. The SNPs implicated include rs965513 (FOXE1), rs71369530 (FOXE1), rs1867277 (FOXE1), rs3092993 (ATM), rs1801516 (ATM), rs2296675 (MGMT), rs2278420 (ZNF350), rs1991517 (TSHR), rs1799939 (RET), and rs1052559 (ERCC2 or XPD) [113].

3. Preoperative Molecular Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Ultrasound-guided FNA is a procedure of choice for evaluating thyroid nodules [2,114]. About 15% of all thyroid FNA samples are cytologically classified as indeterminate diagnostic categories, which include atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of an undetermined significance and follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm [115]. The 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines recommend that molecular testing can reduce the number of repeat FNA and the rate of unnecessary diagnostic surgery in patients with indeterminate cytologic diagnosis [2,116].
In thyroid nodules with indeterminate FNA cytology, the four main molecular tests commercially used in the United States are: ThyroSeq v3 Genomic Classifier (GC) (Sonic Healthcare, NY, USA); Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier and Xpression Atlas (Veracyte, South San Francisco, CA, USA); ThyGeNEXT and ThyraMIR (Interpace Diagnostics, Parsippany, NJ, USA); and RosettaGX® Reveal™ (Reveal) (Rosetta Genomics, Philadelphia, PA, USA). These molecular tests are characterized by NGS based the genotyping and gene expression profiling of mRNA or microRNA, and providing a high negative predictive value and risk stratification of cancer and NIFTP. These molecular tests were validated in prospectively collected samples [117,118,119] or in a retrospective blinded validation set [120], and their test performances are summarized in Figure 3.

4. Liquid Biopsy

Liquid biopsy is a non-invasive method used for early diagnosis, follow-up, and molecular profiling of cancer. A growing number of studies have evaluated the utility of liquid biopsy in thyroid cancer.
Circulating tumor cells have been found in thyroid cancers of both follicular and parafollicular cell origin. Limited evidence suggests that the number of circulating tumor cells correlates with initial tumor stage, and also acts as a predictor of recurrence, metastasis, and overall survival, although no definite cut-off values have been established. Attempts have also been made to test the utility of a decrease in circulating tumor cell count to predict response to RAI, but with inconclusive results [121].
Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provides for an easily accessible source of tumor DNA for molecular evaluation. The utility of cfDNA or ctDNA for detecting alterations in a single gene, commonly BRAF V600E mutation, or multiple genes in thyroid cancer, has been evaluated. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the technique have varied across studies. Thus, liquid biopsy cannot yet replace tissue evaluation in endocrine tumors. It can, instead, be used for follow-up after the identification of specific mutations in the tissue [121]. Sato [122], in a recent study on 22 cases of PTC, concluded that BRAF V600E, when detected in pre-surgery plasma is indicative of a high fraction of BRAF V600E in the tumor, and extrathyroidal extension. In addition, the presence of the mutation in post-surgery ctDNA can be predictive of tumor recurrence [122]. As advanced disease and dedifferentiated thyroid cancer are more likely to have detectable ctDNA, its analysis is particularly useful in this group of patients for diagnosis, deciding upon targeted therapy, and follow-up [123,124]. A recent study on ATC also documented a worse overall survival, in patients with PIK3CA mutation detected in cfDNA [124].
In addition to circulating DNA, limited data exists on the use of circulating RNA as a potential source of detecting BRAF V600E mutation in blood [125].
Plasma-derived exosomes are alternative non-invasive biomarkers. Limited evidence suggests a change in the miRNA profile of exosomes with thyroid cancer development, and, hence, provides a potential tumor biomarker [126]. Plasma exosomes derived from cancer cells also act as a potential source of tumor miRNA, with implications similar to those with miRNA derived from tumor tissues [127]. Other potential biomarkers include circulating free lncRNA and miRNA, as already discussed.

5. Targeted Therapies in Thyroid Cancer

Several selective and multikinase inhibitors are currently approved, to treat advanced or treatment-refractory thyroid cancer (Table 2). Multikinase inhibitors act on two or more target molecules. Selective inhibitors act on a single target molecule that is hyperactive or mutant in cancer cells. Specific molecular targets currently available for the treatment of thyroid cancer include BRAF, RET, MEK, and NRTK.

6. Immunohistochemical Markers

Immunostaining is a long-used indispensable tool, for complementing routine techniques in elucidating differential diagnosis in surgical pathology. It provides for an easy, cheap, and widely available technique used for the identification of lineage or cell type in oncopathology.
Transcription factors TTF1 (NKX2.1), PAX8, and TTF2 (FOXE1) are involved in the development and functioning of the thyroid gland [129]. Their tissue-specificity makes them useful immunohistochemical markers for the identification of follicular cell differentiation. Thyroglobulin and sodium/iodide symporter are other such markers, and the former is one of the commonly used immunostains for the detection of thyroid tissue outside of the thyroid gland proper. Calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen serve as identifiers for C cell differentiation.
The recent development of novel markers, including mutation-specific markers and those with translational importance, has revolutionized the practice of IHC. These advancements have greatly affected thyroid clinical practice and research, too.

6.1. Ki-67

Ki-67 is the protein product of the gene MKI67, and is a commonly used immunohistochemical marker of proliferation. Its physiological function is the prevention of the merging of chromosomes into a single chromatin mass after the nuclear envelope has been disassembled [130]. The monoclonal antibody, MIB1, is the most widely used and validated clone for Ki-67 [131,132].
Compared to other organ systems, the Ki-67/MIB1 proliferative index is of limited use in thyroid pathology. This is because of the simplicity of diagnostic algorithms in contrast to other tumor classifications. Nevertheless, it does have utility in differentiating non-neoplastic from neoplastic thyroid lesions, and low-grade from high-grade tumors. Normal thyroid follicular cells show a Ki-67 index less than 0.1–0.2% [133,134]. In case of malignancies of follicular cell origin, the index increases with the decrease in differentiation: <10% in DTC, 10–30% in PDTC, and >30% in ATC [5] (Figure 4). A higher cut-off of (50%) has been recommended by some authors as a diagnostic criteria for ATC [135,136,137].
More recently, the Ki-67 index has been proposed to be useful in the stratification of PTC, FTC, and MTC into different risk categories, with a higher labeling index being associated with aggressive clinical behavior [135,138,139,140]. It has been proposed that DTC should be stratified into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups using the Ki-67 cut-off values of <5%, 5–10%, and 10–30% [135,140].
In PTC, the cut-off values proposed have varied among studies, from 1 to 5% [135,141], with some authors suggesting that the Ki-67 index should be combined with other biomarkers to predict prognosis [141,142]. Importantly, a recent study demonstrated the Ki-67 index to correlate with the avidity of the tumor for RAI [143]. Aggressive histological variants of PTC are more likely to show a higher Ki-67 proliferative index than the classical variant, but have a better clinical outcome in the case of the presence of a low Ki-67 index [135]. Interestingly, the cribriform-morular variant of PTC, a relatively indolent tumor, has been reported to show a higher Ki-67 labeling index than classical PTC [144].
In minimally invasive FTC, there is limited evidence suggesting that a high Ki-67 index, defined as more than 5%, predicts tumor recurrence; although, an association with overall survival could not be demonstrated [138].
Similarly, in MTC, the Ki-67 index in combination with other biomarkers has been suggested to predict outcomes [139,145,146]. In a recent study, the authors defined a low Ki-67 proliferative index as <3%, intermediate as 3–20%, and high as >20% [139], while a two-tiered system considers a cut-off of 5% [147].

6.2. Second-Generation Neuroendocrine Markers

Chromogranin A and synaptophysin are the most widely used neuroendocrine markers. These, along with calcitonin and the carcinoembryonic antigen, are useful for the diagnosis of MTC. The second-generation neuroendocrine markers insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1), ISL1, and secretagogin, have high sensitivity and specificity for neuroendocrine differentiation, expressed even in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas [148,149,150]. INSM1 has been reported to be a highly sensitive and specific neuroendocrine marker, useful in the diagnosis of MTC and C cell hyperplasia [149].
Recently, FOXA1, a transcription factor involved in embryogenesis, has been found to be expressed in C cells and MTC. The absence of its expression in follicular cells makes it a useful marker for MTC diagnosis [151].

6.3. Next-Generation Immunohistochemistry

Next-generation IHC involves the use of antibodies to detect genetic alterations at the protein level [152], and is being increasingly applied in thyroid cancer, too (Table 3). Its main use is as a surrogate of molecular testing, which can have diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive significance.

6.3.1. BRAF V600E (VE1)

Immunostaining, using a mouse monoclonal antibody VE1, specific for the most prevalent mutation in thyroid cancer BRAF V600E, has shown excellent concordance with molecular testing (Figure 5a) [153,154,155]. A recent meta-analysis showed that by using this antibody, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of detecting BRAF V600E using VE1 is 96.8% and 86.3%, respectively [153]. The sensitivity and specificity of IHC depends on the sensitivity of the molecular test being used for confirmation, with maximum discordance (7–23%) being noted with Sanger sequencing, and the least (<2%) with real-time PCR [154]. Moreover, the fraction of discordant cases decreases to 3%, if two molecular tests are performed, and from 5% following a single molecular test [154]. However, before clinical use of the antibody in a given laboratory, the validation of the antibody using a reference molecular test in a well-powered pilot series is essential [155]. Appropriate positive control, such as a case of malignant melanoma proven by molecular testing to have BRAF V600E, should be used.

6.3.2. RAS

Clone SP174 is a monoclonal NRAS Q61R mutation-specific antibody. It has also been documented to have high sensitivity and specificity for detecting other RAS mutations, namely KRAS Q61R and HRAS Q61R [156,157,158,159]. In MTC, RAS mutations occur as mutually exclusive from the germline RET mutation. Therefore, RAS mutation-specific IHC is useful for selecting patients with MTC for genetic testing [158]. The utility of SP174 immunostaining in the differential diagnosis of follicular-patterned thyroid neoplasms is, however, limited due to a lack of specificity of RAS mutations. These are present at variable frequencies in non-neoplastic and neoplastic thyroid lesions, including hyperplastic thyroid nodule, FA, FTC, NIFTP, and the follicular variant of PTC [11,157,160]. RAS mutated colorectal carcinoma or melanoma cases can be used as positive control.

6.3.3. Pan-Trk

Immunostaining against TRK antigens detects increased levels of any of the three Trk proteins, namely, Trk A, Trk B, or Trk C (Figure 5b), and can be used as a screening tool, as it helps in cost-cutting; however, it is not acceptable as a stand-alone technique [26].
EPR17341 is the most widely used clone [161]. It detects the C-terminal region of all the three Trk proteins, and detects both wild-type and fusion proteins, and is, hence, considered pan-TRK [161]. IHC staining pattern is heterogeneous and, depending upon the specific fusion partner, can be nuclear, perinuclear, cytoplasmic granular, diffuse cytoplasmic, or membranous. There can be false negative and false positive results. The cut-off to categorize a case as positive, ranges from 1 to 10% [26]. Normal tissues of the central and peripheral nervous system, vascular smooth muscle, and ganglion cells in the wall of the appendix, serve as positive control [26].

6.3.4. β-Catenin

The cribriform-morular variant of PTC can occur sporadically or more commonly in association with FAP. The tumor frequently harbors germline or somatic mutation of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) or somatic mutation of CTNNB1, both of which lead to the accumulation of β-catenin in cytoplasm and nucleus of tumor cells, which can be detected by IHC (Figure 5c) [162]. Another PTC variant, PTC with fibromatosis/fasciitis-like stroma, demonstrates CTNNB1 mutation in its mesenchymal component, detectable by IHC [163].

6.3.5. PTEN

PTEN inactivation can be assessed immunohistochemically, with the loss of protein expression being indicative [164,165]. Barletta, in their study on 21 proven/suspected cases of Cowden syndrome, reported IHC to have a high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (92.3%) [166]. Beg et al. reported a lack of association between IHC results and PTEN gene deletion, as detected by FISH. The authors concluded that mechanisms, such as epigenetic modifications other than gene deletion, are involved in loss of PTEN protein expression [58].

6.3.6. ALK

Increased ALK kinase activity, resulting from translocations and mutations involving the ALK gene, can be detected immunohistochemically [20,21] (Figure 5d). The four most commonly used and tested antibody clones against this protein include ALK1, 1A4, D5F3, and 5A4. Of these, D5F3 and 5A4 have been reported to have the highest sensitivity in detecting ALK rearrangements in lung cancer [167]. Ventana ALK D5F3 CDx assay (Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx Assay, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, U.S.A.) has been approved by the FDA as a companion diagnostic and predictive kit for using crizotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer [168].

6.4. Tumor Microenvironment

Tumor development and progression are regulated by genetic and epigenetic changes in the tumor cells and the modulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Tumor cells dynamically interact with specific components of the TME and create favorable environments for immune escape, angiogenesis, tumor progression, and metastasis [169]. Immune cells in TME can exert both antitumor and protumor functions in thyroid cancer [170].
The immunosuppressive cells promoting tumor growth are regulatory T (Treg) cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), CD163+ (M2-type) tumor-associated macrophages (TAM), N2-type tumor-associated neutrophils (TAN), tumor-associated mast cells, and immature dendritic cells [171,172,173]. Treg infiltration in the TME occurs at a higher frequency in metastatic lymph nodes, locally advanced pT4 DTC, and ATC [171]. Increased TAM density in TME was associated with the lymph node metastasis of PTC [174], and reduced cancer-related survival in advanced thyroid cancer [175]. TAN density was associated with thyroid cancer size [176].
A higher ratio between peripheral blood neutrophil and lymphocyte count was associated with a larger tumor size and high risk of recurrence in DTC [177], and was more frequently found in ATC than in other types of thyroid cancers [173]. A high level of circulating MDSC in preoperative peripheral blood was associated with persistent disease after initial treatment [178].
Anticancer immune cells in thyroid cancers include cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (CTLs), natural killer (NK) cells, Th1 cells, M1 TAMs, N1 TANs, and mature dendritic cells [173]. A high CTL infiltration in tumor tissue was associated with improved disease-free survival of patients with DTC [179].
Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) as the major cellular components of the TME, play a key role in cancer development and progression [180]. The high expression of CAF markers, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGFR)-β, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and vimentin in tumor tissue, was associated with lymph node metastasis, BRAF V600E mutation, and shorter survival in PTC [180].

6.4.1. PD-1/PD-L1

PD-1 (programmed cell death-1) is a receptor expressed on the surface of activated T cells. It acts as an immune checkpoint protein by interacting with PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand-1) and PD-L2 present on the surface of other immune cells. This interplay regulates the T cell immune response in physiological conditions. PD-L1 is overexpressed in many cancers, and is being increasingly evaluated in thyroid cancer as a diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic marker.
PD-L1 expression determines the response to anti-PD-L1 therapy in various malignancies. Currently, immunotherapy as a part of combination therapy is being evaluated in metastatic and RAI-refractory thyroid cancer [181]. PD-L1 expression can be assessed at protein level by IHC (Figure 6), or at mRNA level [182].
Multiple PD-L1 clones are available for IHC [182]. The FDA has approved PD-L1 IHC using a rabbit monoclonal antibody (clone 22C3), for selecting patients for the PD-1-blocking drug pembrolizumab in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer [183], Ventana PD-L1 (SP263) assay for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy durvalumab, and Ventana PD-L1 (SP142) IHC assay for detecting PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Quite a few scoring systems have been proposed for the quantitation of PD-L1 expression in different malignancies [184]. The tumor proportion score (TPS) depicts the percentage of tumor cells showing partial or complete membranous positivity. The combined positivity score (CPS) is the proportion of positive tumor cells and intratumoral immune cells relative to the total number of tumor cells. Other scoring systems include the immune cell score, which takes into account only the tumor-infiltrating immune cells, and the tumor cell and immune cell area scores [185]. At present, there is no consensus regarding the preferred scoring system to be used in thyroid cancer.
The reported frequency of PD-L1 positivity in the tumor cells of different histological subtypes of thyroid cancer has ranged from 7% to 90% [186], and is variable even within the same histological type. This wide range is due to the differences in the clone (22C3, SP142, SP263, E1L3N, 4059, ab82059, ab174838, E1J2J, EPR1161-2, and 5H1); assay (manual vs automated and whole section vs tissue microarray); evaluation methods (membranous and/or cytoplasmic); the cut-off values used; and intratumoral heterogeneity. The optimal cut-off value for positivity of PD-L1 staining has not yet been validated in thyroid cancer, and values used have been more than 0%, 1%, 5%, 10%, 25%, or 30% [186,187]. It is essential that the reaction is evaluated for membranous expression and not for cytoplasmic positivity, as the former is a requisite for clinical trials, upon which anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy is also dependent.
Limited evidence suggests that PD-L1 expression can help to distinguish NIFTP from the invasive variant [182]; however, this finding has not been validated/replicated.
A recent meta-analysis documented PD-L1 expression to be significantly associated with autoimmune thyroiditis, BRAF V600E status, and reduced disease-free survival, but not with overall survival [186].

6.4.2. CD Markers

The cluster of differentiation (also known as cluster of designation) antigens or CD markers are specific types of molecules expressed on the cell surface that help distinguish one cell type from another. These are most widely used in hematopathology to determine cell lineage.
Normal thyroid tissue does not express CD10, CD15, CD20, CD57, CD73, CD99, and CD227. These CD markers are more frequently expressed in malignancy than in benign tumors (Table 4). CD5 is strongly expressed in intrathyroidal thymic carcinoma, but not in thyroid tumors derived from follicular or C cells. On the contrary, CD56 and CD117 are diffusely expressed in normal thyroid tissue and retained in benign thyroid diseases, but their expression is lost in thyroid cancers (Table 4; Figure 7). As with other immunohistochemical markers, there are the differences in the intensity and distribution of immunostaining within the tissues. An understanding of aberrant expression of CD markers in thyroid tumors is not only useful in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors, but it can also help pathologists to avoid diagnostic pitfalls in the diagnosis of metastatic tumors. It is important that CD markers can as serve as potential therapeutic targets.
CD47 (integrin associated protein) is a ubiquitously expressed “don’t eat me” marker. Its action is mediated by binding to the signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα), present on the surface of macrophages. When overexpressed in cancer cells, it inhibits tumor cell phagocytosis. Hence, targeting CD47 is being increasingly evaluated as a management option in ATC [188]. Roles in thyroid oncogenesis, PD-L1 signaling, and multidrug resistance have also been suggested [189,190].

6.5. Other IHC Markers with Potential Promise for Targeted Therapy

6.5.1. PSMA

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a marker of prostate epithelium, and is overexpressed in prostate cancer cells. Interestingly, it has been found to be expressed in endothelial cells of neovasculature in various malignancies and, hence, a possible role in theranostics [216,217].
In thyroid, PSMA expression in neovasculature has been reported to be more frequent in cancers, compared to benign tumors. Furthermore, tumor-associated vessels of PDTC and ATC show a higher expression of PSMA when compared with DTC [218,219]. In DTC, too, a strong PSMA expression is a predictor of shorter progression-free survival and refractoriness to RAI [220,221]. Hence, 68Ga-PSMA has translational relevance and can be used for the imaging and treatment of RAI-refractory thyroid carcinoma. However, potential pitfalls exist [218]. A variable low-level expression has been noted, even in non-neoplastic thyroid diseases within endothelial cells and in dendritic cells [218,219]. Notably, oncocytic tumors, including carcinomas, show low PSMA expression [218].

6.5.2. MSI/MMR

Microsatellite instability (MSI), resulting from the inactivation of DNA mismatch repair (MMR), has been variably reported in thyroid carcinomas [222,223,224] and even in benign lesions, such as nodular goiter and FA [223]. Stepwise acquisition of mutations involving MMR genes with an increasing MSI, has been indicated as a possible pathway of thyroid tumor progression and dedifferentiation [223,225]. Interestingly, limited evidence suggests improved survival in ATC patients with MMR-deficient tumors than those with intact MMR profile [224].
IHC is a useful screening tool for evaluating MSI status, by using antibodies for detecting the MMR proteins MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6. It has sensitivity and specificity similar to MSI [226], and has been evaluated in thyroid carcinomas, though to a limited extent [222].

7. Conclusions

High throughput NGS as a sensitive and accurate diagnostic tool, and liquid biopsy as a less invasive source of nucleic acid, have revolutionized the diagnosis and management of thyroid cancer, with the aim to achieve individualized treatment. There is an ever-growing list of novel and potential biomarkers, which are variably relevant for determining familial occurrence, establishing the diagnosis, targeted therapy, predicting clinical outcome, or even tumor response to therapy. Some of these include various genetic and epigenetic modifications, microRNAs, lncRNAs, germline mutations in MTC and nonMTC, and SNPs. Next-generation IHC is the best example of bench-to-bedside research. It provides for the assessment of genetic markers, namely BRAF V600E, RAS, TRK, PTEN, and ALK. It is more cost-effective, widely available, and easier to perform. Novel neuroendocrine and C cell markers, such as INSM-1, ISL1, secretagonin, and FOXA1, are upcoming in thyroid oncopathology practice and under investigation. While immunotherapy has developed in various cancers, its role in refractory thyroid cancer is still under investigation. An awareness of these advancements ensures their application in clinical practice, as well as facilitates research.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers14010204/s1, Table S1: detailed information about Figure 1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B. and C.-K.J.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.; writing—review and editing, A.B. and C.-K.J.; visualization, C.-K.J.; funding acquisition, C.-K.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant (NRF-2020R1F1A1070028) from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT. This study was also supported by a grant (HI21C0940) from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guth, S.; Theune, U.; Aberle, J.; Galach, A.; Bamberger, C.M. Very High Prevalence of Thyroid Nodules Detected by High Frequency (13 MHz) Ultrasound Examination. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 39, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Haugen, B.R.; Alexander, E.K.; Bible, K.C.; Doherty, G.M.; Mandel, S.J.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; Pacini, F.; Randolph, G.W.; Sawka, A.M.; Schlumberger, M.; et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016, 26, 1–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Keh, S.M.; El-Shunnar, S.K.; Palmer, T.; Ahsan, S.F. Incidence of Malignancy in Solitary Thyroid Nodules. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2015, 129, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kakudo, K.; Bychkov, A.; Bai, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Jung, C.K. The New 4th Edition World Health Organization Classification for Thyroid Tumors, Asian Perspectives. Pathol. Int. 2018, 68, 641–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lloyd, R.V.; Osamura, R.Y.; Kloppel, G.; Rosai, J. Chapter 2 Tumours of the Thyroid Gland. In WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organ; International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Lyon, France, 2017; pp. 65–143. [Google Scholar]
  6. Onenerk, A.M.; Pusztaszeri, M.P.; Canberk, S.; Faquin, W.C. Triage of the Indeterminate Thyroid Aspirate: What Are the Options for the Practicing Cytopathologist? Cancer Cytopathol. 2017, 125, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated Genomic Characterization of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cell 2014, 159, 676–690. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Yoo, S.-K.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.-J.; Jee, H.-G.; Kim, B.-A.; Cho, H.; Song, Y.S.; Cho, S.W.; Won, J.-K.; Shin, J.-Y.; et al. Comprehensive Analysis of the Transcriptional and Mutational Landscape of Follicular and Papillary Thyroid Cancers. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kim, K.; Jeon, S.; Kim, T.-M.; Jung, C.K. Immune Gene Signature Delineates a Subclass of Papillary Thyroid Cancer with Unfavorable Clinical Outcomes. Cancers 2018, 10, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Jung, S.-H.; Kim, M.S.; Jung, C.K.; Park, H.-C.; Kim, S.Y.; Liu, J.; Bae, J.-S.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, T.-M.; Lee, S.H.; et al. Mutational Burdens and Evolutionary Ages of Thyroid Follicular Adenoma Are Comparable to Those of Follicular Carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 69638–69648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Jeong, S.H.; Hong, H.S.; Lee, E.H.; Kwak, J.J.; Lee, J.Y. Analysis of RAS Mutation in Thyroid Nodular Hyperplasia and Follicular Neoplasm in a Korean Population. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. 2018, 1, e00040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hernandez-Prera, J.C.; Valderrabano, P.; Creed, J.H.; de la Iglesia, J.V.; Slebos, R.J.C.; Centeno, B.A.; Tarasova, V.; Hallanger-Johnson, J.; Veloski, C.; Otto, K.J.; et al. Molecular Determinants of Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology and RAS Mutations. Thyroid 2021, 31, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gilani, S.M.; Abi-Raad, R.; Garritano, J.; Cai, G.; Prasad, M.L.; Adeniran, A.J. RAS Mutation and Associated Risk of Malignancy in the Thyroid Gland: An FNA Study with Cytology-Histology Correlation. Cancer Cytopathol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Landa, I.; Ibrahimpasic, T.; Boucai, L.; Sinha, R.; Knauf, J.A.; Shah, R.H.; Dogan, S.; Ricarte-Filho, J.C.; Krishnamoorthy, G.P.; Xu, B.; et al. Genomic and Transcriptomic Hallmarks of Poorly Differentiated and Anaplastic Thyroid Cancers. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 1052–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Pozdeyev, N.; Gay, L.M.; Sokol, E.S.; Hartmaier, R.; Deaver, K.E.; Davis, S.; French, J.D.; Borre, P.V.; LaBarbera, D.V.; Tan, A.-C.; et al. Genetic Analysis of 779 Advanced Differentiated and Anaplastic Thyroid Cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 3059–3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Jung, C.K.; Jung, S.-H.; Jeon, S.; Jeong, Y.M.; Kim, Y.; Lee, S.; Bae, J.-S.; Chung, Y.-J. Risk Stratification Using a Novel Genetic Classifier Including PLEKHS1 Promoter Mutations for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer with Distant Metastasis. Thyroid 2020, 30, 1589–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kelly, L.M.; Barila, G.; Liu, P.; Evdokimova, V.N.; Trivedi, S.; Panebianco, F.; Gandhi, M.; Carty, S.E.; Hodak, S.P.; Luo, J.; et al. Identification of the Transforming STRN-ALK Fusion as a Potential Therapeutic Target in the Aggressive Forms of Thyroid Cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 4233–4238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kohler, H.; Latteyer, S.; Hönes, G.S.; Theurer, S.; Liao, X.-H.; Christoph, S.; Zwanziger, D.; Schulte, J.H.; Kero, J.; Undeutsch, H.; et al. Increased Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Activity Induces a Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma in Mice. Thyroid 2019, 29, 1438–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Panebianco, F.; Nikitski, A.V.; Nikiforova, M.N.; Kaya, C.; Yip, L.; Condello, V.; Wald, A.I.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; Chiosea, S.I. Characterization of Thyroid Cancer Driven by Known and Novel ALK Fusions. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2019, 26, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arndt, A.; Steinestel, K.; Rump, A.; Sroya, M.; Bogdanova, T.; Kovgan, L.; Port, M.; Abend, M.; Eder, S. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Gene Rearrangements in Radiation-Related Human Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma after the Chernobyl Accident. J. Pathol. Clin. Res. 2018, 4, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chou, A.; Fraser, S.; Toon, C.W.; Clarkson, A.; Sioson, L.; Farzin, M.; Cussigh, C.; Aniss, A.; O’Neill, C.; Watson, N.; et al. A Detailed Clinicopathologic Study of ALK-Translocated Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015, 39, 652–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Pekova, B.; Sykorova, V.; Dvorakova, S.; Vaclavikova, E.; Moravcova, J.; Katra, R.; Astl, J.; Vlcek, P.; Kodetova, D.; Vcelak, J.; et al. RET, NTRK, ALK, BRAF, and MET Fusions in a Large Cohort of Pediatric Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas. Thyroid 2020, 30, 1771–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Latteyer, S.; Tiedje, V.; König, K.; Ting, S.; Heukamp, L.C.; Meder, L.; Schmid, K.W.; Führer, D.; Moeller, L.C. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing for TP53, RAS, BRAF, ALK and NF1 Mutations in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. Endocrine 2016, 54, 733–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Murugan, A.K.; Xing, M. Anaplastic Thyroid Cancers Harbor Novel Oncogenic Mutations of the ALK Gene. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 4403–4411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Li, C.-F.; Wu, X.-L.; Wang, J.-J.; Wang, K.; Zhang, S.-Y.; Huang, J.-J.; Hu, H.-Z.; Zheng, H. ALK-1-Positive Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor of the Thyroid Complicated by Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis: Report of a Rare Case and a Literature Review. Diagn. Pathol. 2020, 15, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Weiss, L.M.; Funari, V.A. NTRK Fusions and Trk Proteins: What Are They and How to Test for Them. Hum. Pathol. 2021, 112, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, Y.-C.; Chen, J.-Y.; Huang, C.-J.; Chen, H.-S.; Yang, A.-H.; Hang, J.-F. Detection of NTRK1/3 Rearrangements in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Using Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization, and Next-Generation Sequencing. Endocr. Pathol. 2020, 31, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Okamura, R.; Boichard, A.; Kato, S.; Sicklick, J.K.; Bazhenova, L.; Kurzrock, R. Analysis of NTRK Alterations in Pan-Cancer Adult and Pediatric Malignancies: Implications for NTRK-Targeted Therapeutics. JCO Precis. Oncol. 2018, 2018, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Solomon, J.P.; Linkov, I.; Rosado, A.; Mullaney, K.; Rosen, E.Y.; Frosina, D.; Jungbluth, A.A.; Zehir, A.; Benayed, R.; Drilon, A.; et al. NTRK Fusion Detection across Multiple Assays and 33,997 Cases: Diagnostic Implications and Pitfalls. Mod. Pathol. 2020, 33, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rabes, H.M.; Demidchik, E.P.; Sidorow, J.D.; Lengfelder, E.; Beimfohr, C.; Hoelzel, D.; Klugbauer, S. Pattern of Radiation-Induced RET and NTRK1 Rearrangements in 191 Post-Chernobyl Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas: Biological, Phenotypic, and Clinical Implications. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 1093–1103. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Leeman-Neill, R.J.; Kelly, L.M.; Liu, P.; Brenner, A.V.; Little, M.P.; Bogdanova, T.I.; Evdokimova, V.N.; Hatch, M.; Zurnadzy, L.Y.; Nikiforova, M.N.; et al. ETV6-NTRK3 Is a Common Chromosomal Rearrangement in Radiation-Associated Thyroid Cancer. Cancer 2014, 120, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Prasad, M.L.; Vyas, M.; Horne, M.J.; Virk, R.K.; Morotti, R.; Liu, Z.; Tallini, G.; Nikiforova, M.N.; Christison-Lagay, E.R.; Udelsman, R.; et al. NTRK Fusion Oncogenes in Pediatric Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Northeast United States. Cancer 2016, 122, 1097–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Chu, Y.-H.; Dias-Santagata, D.; Farahani, A.A.; Boyraz, B.; Faquin, W.C.; Nosé, V.; Sadow, P.M. Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characterization of NTRK-Rearranged Thyroid Carcinoma (NRTC). Mod. Pathol. 2020, 33, 2186–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Seethala, R.R.; Chiosea, S.I.; Liu, C.Z.; Nikiforova, M.; Nikiforov, Y.E. Clinical and Morphologic Features of ETV6-NTRK3 Translocated Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in an Adult Population Without Radiation Exposure. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017, 41, 446–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Approves Larotrectinib for Solid Tumors with NTRK Gene Fusions. Available online: Https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Fda-Approves-Larotrectinib-Solid-Tumors-Ntrk-Gene-Fusions (accessed on 6 October 2021).
  36. Thunders, M.; Delahunt, B. Gene of the Month: DICER1: Ruler and Controller. J. Clin. Pathol. 2021, 74, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bae, J.-S.; Jung, S.-H.; Hirokawa, M.; Bychkov, A.; Miyauchi, A.; Lee, S.; Chung, Y.-J.; Jung, C.K. High Prevalence of DICER1 Mutations and Low Frequency of Gene Fusions in Pediatric Follicular-Patterned Tumors of the Thyroid. Endocr. Pathol. 2021, 32, 336–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Foulkes, W.D.; Priest, J.R.; Duchaine, T.F. DICER1: Mutations, MicroRNAs and Mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2014, 14, 662–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Khan, N.E.; Bauer, A.J.; Schultz, K.A.P.; Doros, L.; Decastro, R.M.; Ling, A.; Lodish, M.B.; Harney, L.A.; Kase, R.G.; Carr, A.G.; et al. Quantification of Thyroid Cancer and Multinodular Goiter Risk in the DICER1 Syndrome: A Family-Based Cohort Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 102, 1614–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. De Kock, L.; Bah, I.; Revil, T.; Bérubé, P.; Wu, M.K.; Sabbaghian, N.; Priest, J.R.; Ragoussis, J.; Foulkes, W.D. Deep Sequencing Reveals Spatially Distributed Distinct Hot Spot Mutations in DICER1-Related Multinodular Goiter. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 3637–3645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oliver-Petit, I.; Bertozzi, A.-I.; Grunenwald, S.; Gambart, M.; Pigeon-Kerchiche, P.; Sadoul, J.-L.; Caron, P.J.; Savagner, F. Multinodular Goitre Is a Gateway for Molecular Testing of DICER1 Syndrome. Clin. Endocrinol. 2019, 91, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rio Frio, T.; Bahubeshi, A.; Kanellopoulou, C.; Hamel, N.; Niedziela, M.; Sabbaghian, N.; Pouchet, C.; Gilbert, L.; O’Brien, P.K.; Serfas, K.; et al. DICER1 Mutations in Familial Multinodular Goiter with and without Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumors. JAMA 2011, 305, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Gullo, I.; Batista, R.; Rodrigues-Pereira, P.; Soares, P.; Barroca, H.; do Bom-Sucesso, M.; Sobrinho-Simões, M. Multinodular Goiter Progression Toward Malignancy in a Case of DICER1 Syndrome: Histologic and Molecular Alterations. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2018, 149, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, Y.A.; Im, S.-W.; Jung, K.C.; Chung, E.-J.; Shin, C.H.; Kim, J.-I.; Park, Y.J. Predominant DICER1 Pathogenic Variants in Pediatric Follicular Thyroid Carcinomas. Thyroid 2020, 30, 1120–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wasserman, J.D.; Sabbaghian, N.; Fahiminiya, S.; Chami, R.; Mete, O.; Acker, M.; Wu, M.K.; Shlien, A.; de Kock, L.; Foulkes, W.D. DICER1 Mutations Are Frequent in Adolescent-Onset Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 2009–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Juhlin, C.C.; Stenman, A.; Zedenius, J. Macrofollicular Variant Follicular Thyroid Tumors Are DICER1 Mutated and Exhibit Distinct Histological Features. Histopathology 2021, 79, 661–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chernock, R.D.; Rivera, B.; Borrelli, N.; Hill, D.A.; Fahiminiya, S.; Shah, T.; Chong, A.-S.; Aqil, B.; Mehrad, M.; Giordano, T.J.; et al. Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma of Childhood and Adolescence: A Distinct Entity Characterized by DICER1 Mutations. Mod. Pathol. 2020, 33, 1264–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ghossein, C.A.; Dogan, S.; Farhat, N.; Landa, I.; Xu, B. Expanding the Spectrum of Thyroid Carcinoma with Somatic DICER1 Mutation: A Survey of 829 Thyroid Carcinomas Using MSK-IMPACT next-Generation Sequencing Platform. Virchows Arch. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schultz, K.A.P.; Williams, G.M.; Kamihara, J.; Stewart, D.R.; Harris, A.K.; Bauer, A.J.; Turner, J.; Shah, R.; Schneider, K.; Schneider, K.W.; et al. DICER1 and Associated Conditions: Identification of At-Risk Individuals and Recommended Surveillance Strategies. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 2251–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Agaimy, A.; Witkowski, L.; Stoehr, R.; Cuenca, J.C.C.; González-Muller, C.A.; Brütting, A.; Bährle, M.; Mantsopoulos, K.; Amin, R.M.S.; Hartmann, A.; et al. Malignant Teratoid Tumor of the Thyroid Gland: An Aggressive Primitive Multiphenotypic Malignancy Showing Organotypical Elements and Frequent DICER1 Alterations-Is the Term “Thyroblastoma” More Appropriate? Virchows Arch. 2020, 477, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rooper, L.M.; Bynum, J.P.; Miller, K.P.; Lin, M.T.; Gagan, J.; Thompson, L.D.R.; Bishop, J.A. Recurrent DICER1 Hotspot Mutations in Malignant Thyroid Gland Teratomas: Molecular Characterization and Proposal for a Separate Classification. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2020, 44, 826–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pilarski, R.; Burt, R.; Kohlman, W.; Pho, L.; Shannon, K.M.; Swisher, E. Cowden Syndrome and the PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome: Systematic Review and Revised Diagnostic Criteria. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2013, 105, 1607–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Yehia, L.; Eng, C. PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome. In GeneReviews®; University of Washington: Seattle, WA, USA, 2001; pp. 1993–2021. [Google Scholar]
  54. Harach, H.R.; Soubeyran, I.; Brown, A.; Bonneau, D.; Longy, M. Thyroid Pathologic Findings in Patients with Cowden Disease. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 1999, 3, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Laury, A.R.; Bongiovanni, M.; Tille, J.-C.; Kozakewich, H.; Nosé, V. Thyroid Pathology in PTEN-Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome: Characteristic Findings of a Distinct Entity. Thyroid 2011, 21, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Milas, M.; Mester, J.; Metzger, R.; Shin, J.; Mitchell, J.; Berber, E.; Siperstein, A.E.; Eng, C. Should Patients with Cowden Syndrome Undergo Prophylactic Thyroidectomy? Surgery 2012, 152, 1201–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alvarez-Nuñez, F.; Bussaglia, E.; Mauricio, D.; Ybarra, J.; Vilar, M.; Lerma, E.; de Leiva, A.; Matias-Guiu, X. Thyroid Neoplasia Study Group PTEN Promoter Methylation in Sporadic Thyroid Carcinomas. Thyroid 2006, 16, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Beg, S.; Siraj, A.K.; Jehan, Z.; Prabakaran, S.; Al-Sobhi, S.S.; Al-Dawish, M.; Al-Dayel, F.; Al-Kuraya, K.S. PTEN Loss Is Associated with Follicular Variant of Middle Eastern Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 112, 1938–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Dahia, P.L.; Marsh, D.J.; Zheng, Z.; Zedenius, J.; Komminoth, P.; Frisk, T.; Wallin, G.; Parsons, R.; Longy, M.; Larsson, C.; et al. Somatic Deletions and Mutations in the Cowden Disease Gene, PTEN, in Sporadic Thyroid Tumors. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 4710–4713. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Halachmi, N.; Halachmi, S.; Evron, E.; Cairns, P.; Okami, K.; Saji, M.; Westra, W.H.; Zeiger, M.A.; Jen, J.; Sidransky, D. Somatic Mutations of the PTEN Tumor Suppressor Gene in Sporadic Follicular Thyroid Tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1998, 23, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rurale, G.; Marelli, F.; Duminuco, P.; Persani, L. Glis3 as a Critical Regulator of Thyroid Primordium Specification. Thyroid 2020, 30, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kang, H.S.; Kumar, D.; Liao, G.; Lichti-Kaiser, K.; Gerrish, K.; Liao, X.-H.; Refetoff, S.; Jothi, R.; Jetten, A.M. GLIS3 Is Indispensable for TSH/TSHR-Dependent Thyroid Hormone Biosynthesis and Follicular Cell Proliferation. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 4326–4337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Scoville, D.W.; Kang, H.S.; Jetten, A.M. Transcription Factor GLIS3: Critical Roles in Thyroid Hormone Biosynthesis, Hypothyroidism, Pancreatic Beta Cells and Diabetes. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 215, 107632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pinto, K.; Chetty, R. Gene of the Month: GLIS1-3. J. Clin. Pathol. 2020, 73, 527–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Nikiforova, M.N.; Nikitski, A.V.; Panebianco, F.; Kaya, C.; Yip, L.; Williams, M.; Chiosea, S.I.; Seethala, R.R.; Roy, S.; Condello, V.; et al. GLIS Rearrangement Is a Genomic Hallmark of Hyalinizing Trabecular Tumor of the Thyroid Gland. Thyroid 2019, 29, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Basili, T.; Dopeso, H.; Kim, S.H.; Ferrando, L.; Pareja, F.; Da Cruz Paula, A.; da Silva, E.M.; Stylianou, A.; Maroldi, A.; Marchiò, C.; et al. Oncogenic Properties and Signaling Basis of the PAX8-GLIS3 Fusion Gene. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 147, 2253–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kunstman, J.W.; Juhlin, C.C.; Goh, G.; Brown, T.C.; Stenman, A.; Healy, J.M.; Rubinstein, J.C.; Choi, M.; Kiss, N.; Nelson-Williams, C.; et al. Characterization of the Mutational Landscape of Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer via Whole-Exome Sequencing. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 2318–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Karunamurthy, A.; Panebianco, F.; Hsiao, S.J.; Vorhauer, J.; Nikiforova, M.N.; Chiosea, S.; Nikiforov, Y.E. Prevalence and Phenotypic Correlations of EIF1AX Mutations in Thyroid Nodules. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2016, 23, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Alzahrani, A.S.; Murugan, A.K.; Qasem, E.; Alswailem, M.M.; AlGhamdi, B.; Moria, Y.; Al-Hindi, H. Absence of EIF1AX, PPM1D, and CHEK2 Mutations Reported in Thyroid Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) in a Large Series of Thyroid Cancer. Endocrine 2019, 63, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nicolson, N.G.; Murtha, T.D.; Dong, W.; Paulsson, J.O.; Choi, J.; Barbieri, A.L.; Brown, T.C.; Kunstman, J.W.; Larsson, C.; Prasad, M.L.; et al. Comprehensive Genetic Analysis of Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma Predicts Prognosis Independent of Histology. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 2640–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Simões-Pereira, J.; Moura, M.M.; Marques, I.J.; Rito, M.; Cabrera, R.A.; Leite, V.; Cavaco, B.M. The Role of EIF1AX in Thyroid Cancer Tumourigenesis and Progression. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2019, 42, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Krishnamoorthy, G.P.; Davidson, N.R.; Leach, S.D.; Zhao, Z.; Lowe, S.W.; Lee, G.; Landa, I.; Nagarajah, J.; Saqcena, M.; Singh, K.; et al. EIF1AX and RAS Mutations Cooperate to Drive Thyroid Tumorigenesis through ATF4 and C-MYC. Cancer Discov. 2019, 9, 264–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Asa, S.L.; Ezzat, S. The Epigenetic Landscape of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2018, 469, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sasanakietkul, T.; Murtha, T.D.; Javid, M.; Korah, R.; Carling, T. Epigenetic Modifications in Poorly Differentiated and Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2018, 469, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, K.; Li, C.; Liu, J.; Tang, X.; Li, Z. DNA Methylation Alterations as Therapeutic Prospects in Thyroid Cancer. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2019, 42, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zafon, C.; Gil, J.; Pérez-González, B.; Jordà, M. DNA Methylation in Thyroid Cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2019, 26, R415–R439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Park, J.-L.; Jeon, S.; Seo, E.-H.; Bae, D.H.; Jeong, Y.M.; Kim, Y.; Bae, J.S.; Kim, S.-K.; Jung, C.K.; Kim, Y.S. Comprehensive DNA Methylation Profiling Identifies Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers for Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2020, 30, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Keelawat, S.; Thorner, P.S.; Shuangshoti, S.; Bychkov, A.; Kitkumthorn, N.; Rattanatanyong, P.; Boonyayothin, W.; Poumsuk, U.; Ruangvejvorachai, P.; Mutirangura, A. Detection of Global Hypermethylation in Well-Differentiated Thyroid Neoplasms by Immunohistochemical (5-Methylcytidine) Analysis. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2015, 38, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Celano, M.; Rosignolo, F.; Maggisano, V.; Pecce, V.; Iannone, M.; Russo, D.; Bulotta, S. MicroRNAs as Biomarkers in Thyroid Carcinoma. Int. J. Genom. 2017, 2017, 6496570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Chruścik, A.; Lam, A.K. Clinical Pathological Impacts of MicroRNAs in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Crucial Review. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2015, 99, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Aragon Han, P.; Weng, C.-H.; Khawaja, H.T.; Nagarajan, N.; Schneider, E.B.; Umbricht, C.B.; Witwer, K.W.; Zeiger, M.A. MicroRNA Expression and Association with Clinicopathologic Features in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review. Thyroid 2015, 25, 1322–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Boufraqech, M.; Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, J.; Kebebew, E. MicroRNAs in the Thyroid. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 30, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Park, J.-L.; Kim, S.-K.; Jeon, S.; Jung, C.-K.; Kim, Y.-S. MicroRNA Profile for Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in Thyroid Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Visone, R.; Russo, L.; Pallante, P.; De Martino, I.; Ferraro, A.; Leone, V.; Borbone, E.; Petrocca, F.; Alder, H.; Croce, C.M.; et al. MicroRNAs (MiR)-221 and MiR-222, Both Overexpressed in Human Thyroid Papillary Carcinomas, Regulate P27Kip1 Protein Levels and Cell Cycle. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2007, 14, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Czajka, A.A.; Wójcicka, A.; Kubiak, A.; Kotlarek, M.; Bakuła-Zalewska, E.; Koperski, Ł.; Wiechno, W.; Jażdżewski, K. Family of MicroRNA-146 Regulates RARβ in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Li, D.; Jian, W.; Wei, C.; Song, H.; Gu, Y.; Luo, Y.; Fang, L. Down-Regulation of MiR-181b Promotes Apoptosis by Targeting CYLD in Thyroid Papillary Cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 7672–7680. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Wojtas, B.; Ferraz, C.; Stokowy, T.; Hauptmann, S.; Lange, D.; Dralle, H.; Musholt, T.; Jarzab, B.; Paschke, R.; Eszlinger, M. Differential MiRNA Expression Defines Migration and Reduced Apoptosis in Follicular Thyroid Carcinomas. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2014, 388, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Dettmer, M.; Vogetseder, A.; Durso, M.B.; Moch, H.; Komminoth, P.; Perren, A.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; Nikiforova, M.N. MicroRNA Expression Array Identifies Novel Diagnostic Markers for Conventional and Oncocytic Follicular Thyroid Carcinomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, E1–E7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Sun, D.; Han, S.; Liu, C.; Zhou, R.; Sun, W.; Zhang, Z.; Qu, J. Microrna-199a-5p Functions as a Tumor Suppressor via Suppressing Connective Tissue Growth Factor (CTGF) in Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma. Med. Sci. Monit. 2016, 22, 1210–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Jikuzono, T.; Kawamoto, M.; Yoshitake, H.; Kikuchi, K.; Akasu, H.; Ishikawa, H.; Hirokawa, M.; Miyauchi, A.; Tsuchiya, S.; Shimizu, K.; et al. The MiR-221/222 Cluster, MiR-10b and MiR-92a Are Highly Upregulated in Metastatic Minimally Invasive Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 42, 1858–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Fuziwara, C.S.; Kimura, E.T. MicroRNA Deregulation in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Biology. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2014, 2014, 743450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Abraham, D.; Jackson, N.; Gundara, J.S.; Zhao, J.; Gill, A.J.; Delbridge, L.; Robinson, B.G.; Sidhu, S.B. MicroRNA Profiling of Sporadic and Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Cancer Identifies Predictors of Nodal Metastasis, Prognosis, and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 4772–4781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Pennelli, G.; Galuppini, F.; Barollo, S.; Cavedon, E.; Bertazza, L.; Fassan, M.; Guzzardo, V.; Pelizzo, M.R.; Rugge, M.; Mian, C. The PDCD4/MiR-21 Pathway in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2015, 46, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chu, Y.-H.; Lloyd, R.V. Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: Recent Advances Including MicroRNA Expression. Endocr. Pathol. 2016, 27, 312–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lupo, M.A.; Walts, A.E.; Sistrunk, J.W.; Giordano, T.J.; Sadow, P.M.; Massoll, N.; Campbell, R.; Jackson, S.A.; Toney, N.; Narick, C.M.; et al. Multiplatform Molecular Test Performance in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2020, 48, 1254–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhang, R.; Hardin, H.; Chen, J.; Guo, Z.; Lloyd, R.V. Non-Coding RNAs in Thyroid Cancer. Endocr. Pathol. 2016, 27, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Sui, F.; Ji, M.; Hou, P. Long Non-Coding RNAs in Thyroid Cancer: Biological Functions and Clinical Significance. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2018, 469, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Murugan, A.K.; Munirajan, A.K.; Alzahrani, A.S. Long Noncoding RNAs: Emerging Players in Thyroid Cancer Pathogenesis. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2018, 25, R59–R82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sedaghati, M.; Kebebew, E. Long Noncoding RNAs in Thyroid Cancer. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2019, 26, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Rahner, N.; Steinke, V. Hereditary Cancer Syndromes. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2008, 105, 706–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Nosé, V. Familial Follicular Cell Tumors: Classification and Morphological Characteristics. Endocr. Pathol. 2010, 21, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. LiVolsi, V.A.; Baraban, E.; Baloch, Z.W. Familial Thyroid Carcinoma: The Road Less Traveled in Thyroid Pathology—An Update. Diagn. Histopathol. 2017, 23, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hińcza, K.; Kowalik, A.; Kowalska, A. Current Knowledge of Germline Genetic Risk Factors for the Development of Non-Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Genes 2019, 10, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Bann, D.V.; Jin, Q.; Sheldon, K.E.; Houser, K.R.; Nguyen, L.; Warrick, J.I.; Baker, M.J.; Broach, J.R.; Gerhard, G.S.; Goldenberg, D. Genetic Variants Implicate Dual Oxidase-2 in Familial and Sporadic Nonmedullary Thyroid Cancer. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 5490–5499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Nosé, V. Familial Thyroid Cancer: A Review. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24 (Suppl. 2), S19–S33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Liang, B.; Ding, H.; Huang, L.; Luo, H.; Zhu, X. GWAS in Cancer: Progress and Challenges. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2020, 295, 537–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Saenko, V.A.; Rogounovitch, T.I. Genetic Polymorphism Predisposing to Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Review of Major Findings of the Genome-Wide Association Studies. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 33, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Liyanarachchi, S.; Gudmundsson, J.; Ferkingstad, E.; He, H.; Jonasson, J.G.; Tragante, V.; Asselbergs, F.W.; Xu, L.; Kiemeney, L.A.; Netea-Maier, R.T.; et al. Assessing Thyroid Cancer Risk Using Polygenic Risk Scores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 5997–6002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Matsuse, M.; Takahashi, M.; Mitsutake, N.; Nishihara, E.; Hirokawa, M.; Kawaguchi, T.; Rogounovitch, T.; Saenko, V.; Bychkov, A.; Suzuki, K.; et al. The FOXE1 and NKX2-1 Loci Are Associated with Susceptibility to Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in the Japanese Population. J. Med. Genet. 2011, 48, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Bychkov, A.; Saenko, V.; Nakashima, M.; Mitsutake, N.; Rogounovitch, T.; Nikitski, A.; Orim, F.; Yamashita, S. Patterns of FOXE1 Expression in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma by Immunohistochemistry. Thyroid 2013, 23, 817–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Nikitski, A.V.; Rogounovitch, T.I.; Bychkov, A.; Takahashi, M.; Yoshiura, K.-I.; Mitsutake, N.; Kawaguchi, T.; Matsuse, M.; Drozd, V.M.; Demidchik, Y.; et al. Genotype Analyses in the Japanese and Belarusian Populations Reveal Independent Effects of Rs965513 and Rs1867277 but Do Not Support the Role of FOXE1 Polyalanine Tract Length in Conferring Risk for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Thyroid 2017, 27, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Rogounovitch, T.I.; Bychkov, A.; Takahashi, M.; Mitsutake, N.; Nakashima, M.; Nikitski, A.V.; Hayashi, T.; Hirokawa, M.; Ishigaki, K.; Shigematsu, K.; et al. The Common Genetic Variant Rs944289 on Chromosome 14q13.3 Associates with Risk of Both Malignant and Benign Thyroid Tumors in the Japanese Population. Thyroid 2015, 25, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Zidane, M.; Cazier, J.-B.; Chevillard, S.; Ory, C.; Schlumberger, M.; Dupuy, C.; Deleuze, J.-F.; Boland, A.; Haddy, N.; Lesueur, F.; et al. Genetic Susceptibility to Radiation-Related Differentiated Thyroid Cancers: A Systematic Review of Literature. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2019, 26, R583–R596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Jung, C.K.; Hong, S.; Bychkov, A.; Kakudo, K. The Use of Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) Cytology in Patients with Thyroid Nodules in Asia: A Brief Overview of Studies from the Working Group of Asian Thyroid FNA Cytology. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 2017, 51, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Vuong, H.G.; Chung, D.G.B.; Ngo, L.M.; Bui, T.Q.; Hassell, L.; Jung, C.K.; Kakudo, K.; Bychkov, A. The Use of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in Pediatric Thyroid Nodules: A Meta-Analysis. Thyroid 2021, 31, 1203–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Patel, K.N.; Yip, L.; Lubitz, C.C.; Grubbs, E.G.; Miller, B.S.; Shen, W.; Angelos, P.; Chen, H.; Doherty, G.M.; Fahey, T.J.; et al. The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Guidelines for the Definitive Surgical Management of Thyroid Disease in Adults. Ann. Surg. 2020, 271, e21–e93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Labourier, E.; Shifrin, A.; Busseniers, A.E.; Lupo, M.A.; Manganelli, M.L.; Andruss, B.; Wylie, D.; Beaudenon-Huibregtse, S. Molecular Testing for MiRNA, MRNA, and DNA on Fine-Needle Aspiration Improves the Preoperative Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 2743–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Patel, K.N.; Angell, T.E.; Babiarz, J.; Barth, N.M.; Blevins, T.; Duh, Q.-Y.; Ghossein, R.A.; Harrell, R.M.; Huang, J.; Kennedy, G.C.; et al. Performance of a Genomic Sequencing Classifier for the Preoperative Diagnosis of Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules. JAMA Surg. 2018, 153, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Steward, D.L.; Carty, S.E.; Sippel, R.S.; Yang, S.P.; Sosa, J.A.; Sipos, J.A.; Figge, J.J.; Mandel, S.; Haugen, B.R.; Burman, K.D.; et al. Performance of a Multigene Genomic Classifier in Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology: A Prospective Blinded Multicenter Study. JAMA Oncol. 2019, 5, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Lithwick-Yanai, G.; Dromi, N.; Shtabsky, A.; Morgenstern, S.; Strenov, Y.; Feinmesser, M.; Kravtsov, V.; Leon, M.E.; Hajdúch, M.; Ali, S.Z.; et al. Multicentre Validation of a MicroRNA-Based Assay for Diagnosing Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules Utilising Fine Needle Aspirate Smears. J. Clin. Pathol. 2017, 70, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Tonozzi, T.R.; Kammesheidt, A.; Braunstein, G.D.; Braunstein, G.D. Liquid Biopsies in Endocrine Neoplasia—A Systematic Review. US Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Sato, A.; Tanabe, M.; Tsuboi, Y.; Niwa, T.; Shinozaki-Ushiku, A.; Seto, Y.; Murakami, Y. Circulating Tumor DNA Harboring the BRAFV600E Mutation May Predict Poor Outcomes of Primary Papillary Thyroid Cancer Patients. Thyroid 2021, 31, 1822–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Allin, D.M.; Shaikh, R.; Carter, P.; Thway, K.; Sharabiani, M.T.A.; Gonzales-de-Castro, D.; O’Leary, B.; Garcia-Murillas, I.; Bhide, S.; Hubank, M.; et al. Circulating Tumour DNA Is a Potential Biomarker for Disease Progression and Response to Targeted Therapy in Advanced Thyroid Cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 2018, 103, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Qin, Y.; Wang, J.R.; Wang, Y.; Iyer, P.; Cote, G.J.; Busaidy, N.L.; Dadu, R.; Zafereo, M.; Williams, M.D.; Ferrarotto, R.; et al. Clinical Utility of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Mutations in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma. Thyroid 2021, 31, 1235–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Lubitz, C.C.; Parangi, S.; Holm, T.M.; Bernasconi, M.J.; Schalck, A.P.; Suh, H.; Economopoulos, K.P.; Gunda, V.; Donovan, S.E.; Sadow, P.M.; et al. Detection of Circulating BRAF(V600E) in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. J. Mol. Diagn. 2016, 18, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Samsonov, R.; Burdakov, V.; Shtam, T.; Radzhabova, Z.; Vasilyev, D.; Tsyrlina, E.; Titov, S.; Ivanov, M.; Berstein, L.; Filatov, M.; et al. Plasma Exosomal MiR-21 and MiR-181a Differentiates Follicular from Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 12011–12021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Lee, J.C.; Zhao, J.-T.; Gundara, J.; Serpell, J.; Bach, L.A.; Sidhu, S. Papillary Thyroid Cancer-Derived Exosomes Contain MiRNA-146b and MiRNA-222. J. Surg. Res. 2015, 196, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. NIH National Cancer Institute. Drugs Approved for Thyroid Cancer. Available online: Https://Www.Cancer.Gov/about-Cancer/Treatment/Drugs/Thyroid (accessed on 1 November 2021).
  129. Kimura, S. Thyroid-Specific Transcription Factors and Their Roles in Thyroid Cancer. J. Thyroid Res. 2011, 2011, 710213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Cuylen, S.; Blaukopf, C.; Politi, A.Z.; Müller-Reichert, T.; Neumann, B.; Poser, I.; Ellenberg, J.; Hyman, A.A.; Gerlich, D.W. Ki-67 Acts as a Biological Surfactant to Disperse Mitotic Chromosomes. Nature 2016, 535, 308–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  131. Dowsett, M.; Nielsen, T.O.; A’Hern, R.; Bartlett, J.; Coombes, R.C.; Cuzick, J.; Ellis, M.; Henry, N.L.; Hugh, J.C.; Lively, T.; et al. Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2011, 103, 1656–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Nielsen, T.O.; Leung, S.C.Y.; Rimm, D.L.; Dodson, A.; Acs, B.; Badve, S.; Denkert, C.; Ellis, M.J.; Fineberg, S.; Flowers, M.; et al. Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Updated Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2021, 113, 808–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Saad, A.G.; Kumar, S.; Ron, E.; Lubin, J.H.; Stanek, J.; Bove, K.E.; Nikiforov, Y.E. Proliferative Activity of Human Thyroid Cells in Various Age Groups and Its Correlation with the Risk of Thyroid Cancer after Radiation Exposure. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 91, 2672–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Bychkov, A. Epithelial Hyperplasia Is Responsible for the Compensatory Enlargement of Remaining Thyroid Lobe after Thyroidectomy. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2018, 275, 2417–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kakudo, K.; Wakasa, T.; Ohta, Y.; Yane, K.; Ito, Y.; Yamashita, H. Prognostic Classification of Thyroid Follicular Cell Tumors Using Ki-67 Labeling Index: Risk Stratification of Thyroid Follicular Cell Carcinomas. Endocr. J. 2015, 62, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Hirokawa, M.; Sugitani, I.; Kakudo, K.; Sakamoto, A.; Higashiyama, T.; Sugino, K.; Toda, K.; Ogasawara, S.; Yoshimoto, S.; Hasegawa, Y.; et al. Histopathological Analysis of Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma Cases with Long-Term Survival: A Report from the Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma Research Consortium of Japan. Endocr. J. 2016, 63, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kakudo, K.; Asai, M.; Bai, Y. How to Confirm or Deny High-Risk Thyroid Carcinoma Is a Challenge for Pathologists. Pathol. Int. 2017, 67, 179–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Ito, Y.; Hirokawa, M.; Miyauchi, A.; Masuoka, H.; Yabuta, T.; Fukushima, M.; Kihara, M.; Higashiyama, T.; Kobayashi, K.; Miya, A. Prognostic Impact of Ki-67 Labeling Index in Minimally Invasive Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma. Endocr. J. 2016, 63, 913–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Fuchs, T.L.; Nassour, A.J.; Glover, A.; Sywak, M.S.; Sidhu, S.B.; Delbridge, L.W.; Clifton-Bligh, R.J.; Gild, M.L.; Tsang, V.; Robinson, B.G.; et al. A Proposed Grading Scheme for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Based on Proliferative Activity (Ki-67 and Mitotic Count) and Coagulative Necrosis. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2020, 44, 1419–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kakudo, K.; Liu, Z.; Bai, Y.; Li, Y.; Kitayama, N.; Satoh, S.; Nakashima, M.; Jung, C.K. How to Identify Indolent Thyroid Tumors Unlikely to Recur and Cause Cancer Death Immediately after Surgery—Risk Stratification of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Young Patients. Endocr. J. 2021, 68, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Tang, J.; Gui, C.; Qiu, S.; Wang, M. The Clinicopathological Significance of Ki67 in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Suitable Indicator? World J. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 16, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Matsuse, M.; Yabuta, T.; Saenko, V.; Hirokawa, M.; Nishihara, E.; Suzuki, K.; Yamashita, S.; Miyauchi, A.; Mitsutake, N. TERT Promoter Mutations and Ki-67 Labeling Index as a Prognostic Marker of Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas: Combination of Two Independent Factors. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Nilsson, J.N.; Siikanen, J.; Hedman, C.; Juhlin, C.C.; Ihre Lundgren, C. Pre-Therapeutic Measurements of Iodine Avidity in Papillary and Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Reveal Associations with Thyroglobulin Expression, Histological Variants and Ki-67 Index. Cancers 2021, 13, 3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Hirokawa, M.; Matsuda, K.; Kudo, T.; Higuchi, M.; Suzuki, A.; Takada, N.; Nakashima, M.; Miyauchi, A. Cribriform-Morular Variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Shows High Ki-67 Labeling Indices, despite Its Excellent Prognosis. Pathobiology 2019, 86, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Mian, C.; Pennelli, G.; Barollo, S.; Cavedon, E.; Nacamulli, D.; Vianello, F.; Negro, I.; Pozza, G.; Boschin, I.M.; Pelizzo, M.R.; et al. Combined RET and Ki-67 Assessment in Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Useful Tool for Patient Risk Stratification. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2011, 164, 971–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Frank-Raue, K.; Machens, A.; Leidig-Bruckner, G.; Rondot, S.; Haag, C.; Schulze, E.; Lorenz, A.; Kreissl, M.C.; Dralle, H.; Raue, F.; et al. Prevalence and Clinical Spectrum of Nonsecretory Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma in a Series of 839 Patients with Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Thyroid 2013, 23, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Xu, B.; Fuchs, T.L.; Ahmadi, S.; Alghamdi, M.; Alzumaili, B.; Bani, M.-A.; Baudin, E.; Chou, A.; De Leo, A.; Fagin, J.A.; et al. International Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Grading System: A Validated Grading System for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 40, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Agaimy, A.; Erlenbach-Wünsch, K.; Konukiewitz, B.; Schmitt, A.M.; Rieker, R.J.; Vieth, M.; Kiesewetter, F.; Hartmann, A.; Zamboni, G.; Perren, A.; et al. ISL1 Expression Is Not Restricted to Pancreatic Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Neoplasms, but Is Also Commonly Found in Well and Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Extrapancreatic Origin. Mod. Pathol. 2013, 26, 995–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Seok, J.Y.; Kang, M.; De Peralta-Venturina, M.; Fan, X. Diagnostic Utility of INSM1 in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2021, 29, 615–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Juhlin, C.C. Second-Generation Neuroendocrine Immunohistochemical Markers: Reflections from Clinical Implementation. Biology 2021, 10, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Nonaka, D. A Study of FoxA1 Expression in Thyroid Tumors. Hum. Pathol. 2017, 65, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hornick, J.L. Replacing Molecular Genetic Testing with Immunohistochemistry Using Antibodies That Recognize the Protein Products of Gene Rearrangements: “Next-Generation” Immunohistochemistry. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2021, 45, 584–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Singarayer, R.; Mete, O.; Perrier, L.; Thabane, L.; Asa, S.L.; Van Uum, S.; Ezzat, S.; Goldstein, D.P.; Sawka, A.M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of BRAF V600E Immunohistochemistry in Thyroid Histopathology. Endocr. Pathol. 2019, 30, 201–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Choden, S.; Keelawat, S.; Jung, C.K.; Bychkov, A. VE1 Immunohistochemistry Improves the Limit of Genotyping for Detecting BRAFV600E Mutation in Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Choden, S.; Keelawat, S.; Jung, C.K.; Bychkov, A. An Affordable Immunohistochemical Approach to Estimate the Prevalence of BRAFV600E in Large Cohort Studies-Establishing the Baseline Rate of BRAF Mutation in an Institutional Series of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma from Thailand. Gland Surg. 2020, 9, 1867–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Dias-Santagata, D.; Su, Y.; Hoang, M.P. Immunohistochemical Detection of NRASQ61R Mutation in Diverse Tumor Types. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2016, 145, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Oishi, N.; Kondo, T.; Vuong, H.G.; Nakazawa, T.; Mochizuki, K.; Kasai, K.; Inoue, T.; Tahara, I.; Hirokawa, M.; Miyauchi, A.; et al. Immunohistochemical Detection of NRAS(Q61R) Protein in Follicular-Patterned Thyroid Tumors. Hum. Pathol. 2016, 53, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Reagh, J.; Bullock, M.; Andrici, J.; Turchini, J.; Sioson, L.; Clarkson, A.; Watson, N.; Sheen, A.; Lim, G.; Delbridge, L.; et al. NRASQ61R Mutation-Specific Immunohistochemistry Also Identifies the HRASQ61R Mutation in Medullary Thyroid Cancer and May Have a Role in Triaging Genetic Testing for MEN2. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017, 41, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Lasota, J.; Kowalik, A.; Felisiak-Golabek, A.; Inaguma, S.; Wang, Z.-F.; Pięciak, L.; Zięba, S.; Pęksa, R.; Kopczynski, J.; Okoń, K.; et al. SP174, NRAS Q61R Mutant-Specific Antibody, Cross-Reacts With KRAS Q61R Mutant Protein in Colorectal Carcinoma. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2017, 141, 564–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Marotta, V.; Bifulco, M.; Vitale, M. Significance of RAS Mutations in Thyroid Benign Nodules and Non-Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Hechtman, J.F.; Benayed, R.; Hyman, D.M.; Drilon, A.; Zehir, A.; Frosina, D.; Arcila, M.E.; Dogan, S.; Klimstra, D.S.; Ladanyi, M.; et al. Pan-Trk Immunohistochemistry Is an Efficient and Reliable Screen for the Detection of NTRK Fusions. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017, 41, 1547–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Andrici, J.; Gill, A.J.; Hornick, J.L. Next Generation Immunohistochemistry: Emerging Substitutes to Genetic Testing? Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2018, 35, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Rebecchini, C.; Nobile, A.; Piana, S.; Sarro, R.; Bisig, B.; Gerasimos, S.P.; Saglietti, C.; Matter, M.; Marino, L.; Bongiovanni, M. Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma with Nodular Fasciitis-like Stroma and β-Catenin Mutations Should Be Renamed Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma with Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis. Mod. Pathol. 2017, 30, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Papathomas, T.G.; Nosé, V. New and Emerging Biomarkers in Endocrine Pathology. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2019, 26, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Pulido, R.; Mingo, J.; Gaafar, A.; Nunes-Xavier, C.E.; Luna, S.; Torices, L.; Angulo, J.C.; López, J.I. Precise Immunodetection of PTEN Protein in Human Neoplasia. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2019, 9, a036293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Barletta, J.A.; Bellizzi, A.M.; Hornick, J.L. Immunohistochemical Staining of Thyroidectomy Specimens for PTEN Can Aid in the Identification of Patients with Cowden Syndrome. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2011, 35, 1505–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Marchetti, A.; Di Lorito, A.; Pace, M.V.; Iezzi, M.; Felicioni, L.; D’Antuono, T.; Filice, G.; Guetti, L.; Mucilli, F.; Buttitta, F. ALK Protein Analysis by IHC Staining after Recent Regulatory Changes: A Comparison of Two Widely Used Approaches, Revision of the Literature, and a New Testing Algorithm. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2016, 11, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Department of Health and Human Services. Letter to Ventana Medical Systems on Approval of Premarket Authorization Application for the VENTANA ALK (D5F3) CDx Assay. Available online: Http://Www.Accessdata.Fda.Gov/Cdrh_docs/Pdf14/P140025a.Pdf (accessed on 6 October 2021).
  169. Poltavets, V.; Kochetkova, M.; Pitson, S.M.; Samuel, M.S. The Role of the Extracellular Matrix and Its Molecular and Cellular Regulators in Cancer Cell Plasticity. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  170. Ferrari, S.M.; Fallahi, P.; Galdiero, M.R.; Ruffilli, I.; Elia, G.; Ragusa, F.; Paparo, S.R.; Patrizio, A.; Mazzi, V.; Varricchi, G.; et al. Immune and Inflammatory Cells in Thyroid Cancer Microenvironment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. French, J.D. Immunotherapy for Advanced Thyroid Cancers - Rationale, Current Advances and Future Strategies. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020, 16, 629–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Masucci, M.T.; Minopoli, M.; Carriero, M.V. Tumor Associated Neutrophils. Their Role in Tumorigenesis, Metastasis, Prognosis and Therapy. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  173. Varricchi, G.; Loffredo, S.; Marone, G.; Modestino, L.; Fallahi, P.; Ferrari, S.M.; de Paulis, A.; Antonelli, A.; Galdiero, M.R. The Immune Landscape of Thyroid Cancer in the Context of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Qing, W.; Fang, W.-Y.; Ye, L.; Shen, L.-Y.; Zhang, X.-F.; Fei, X.-C.; Chen, X.; Wang, W.-Q.; Li, X.-Y.; Xiao, J.-C.; et al. Density of Tumor-Associated Macrophages Correlates with Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Thyroid 2012, 22, 905–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Ryder, M.; Ghossein, R.A.; Ricarte-Filho, J.C.M.; Knauf, J.A.; Fagin, J.A. Increased Density of Tumor-Associated Macrophages Is Associated with Decreased Survival in Advanced Thyroid Cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2008, 15, 1069–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Cristinziano, L.; Modestino, L.; Loffredo, S.; Varricchi, G.; Braile, M.; Ferrara, A.L.; de Paulis, A.; Antonelli, A.; Marone, G.; Galdiero, M.R. Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Cells Induce the Release of Mitochondrial Extracellular DNA Traps by Viable Neutrophils. J. Immunol. 2020, 204, 1362–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Liu, C.-L.; Lee, J.-J.; Liu, T.-P.; Chang, Y.-C.; Hsu, Y.-C.; Cheng, S.-P. Blood Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Correlates with Tumor Size in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013, 107, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Angell, T.E.; Lechner, M.G.; Smith, A.M.; Martin, S.E.; Groshen, S.G.; Maceri, D.R.; Singer, P.A.; Epstein, A.L. Circulating Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Predict Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Extent. Thyroid 2016, 26, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  179. Cunha, L.L.; Morari, E.C.; Guihen, A.C.T.; Razolli, D.; Gerhard, R.; Nonogaki, S.; Soares, F.A.; Vassallo, J.; Ward, L.S. Infiltration of a Mixture of Immune Cells May Be Related to Good Prognosis in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma. Clin. Endocrinol. 2012, 77, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Fozzatti, L.; Cheng, S.-Y. Tumor Cells and Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts: A Synergistic Crosstalk to Promote Thyroid Cancer. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 35, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Shin, M.H.; Kim, J.; Lim, S.A.; Kim, J.; Lee, K.-M. Current Insights into Combination Therapies with MAPK Inhibitors and Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Ulisse, S.; Tuccilli, C.; Sorrenti, S.; Antonelli, A.; Fallahi, P.; D’Armiento, E.; Catania, A.; Tartaglia, F.; Amabile, M.I.; Giacomelli, L.; et al. PD-1 Ligand Expression in Epithelial Thyroid Cancers: Potential Clinical Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Sul, J.; Blumenthal, G.M.; Jiang, X.; He, K.; Keegan, P.; Pazdur, R. FDA Approval Summary: Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Whose Tumors Express Programmed Death-Ligand 1. Oncologist 2016, 21, 643–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Cheung, C.C.; Barnes, P.; Bigras, G.; Boerner, S.; Butany, J.; Calabrese, F.; Couture, C.; Deschenes, J.; El-Zimaity, H.; Fischer, G.; et al. Fit-For-Purpose PD-L1 Biomarker Testing for Patient Selection in Immuno-Oncology: Guidelines For Clinical Laboratories From the Canadian Association of Pathologists-Association Canadienne Des Pathologistes (CAP-ACP). Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2019, 27, 699–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Paver, E.C.; Cooper, W.A.; Colebatch, A.J.; Ferguson, P.M.; Hill, S.K.; Lum, T.; Shin, J.-S.; O’Toole, S.; Anderson, L.; Scolyer, R.A.; et al. Programmed Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) as a Predictive Marker for Immunotherapy in Solid Tumours: A Guide to Immunohistochemistry Implementation and Interpretation. Pathology 2021, 53, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Girolami, I.; Pantanowitz, L.; Mete, O.; Brunelli, M.; Marletta, S.; Colato, C.; Trimboli, P.; Crescenzi, A.; Bongiovanni, M.; Barbareschi, M.; et al. Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Is a Potential Biomarker of Disease-Free Survival in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of PD-L1 Immunoexpression in Follicular Epithelial Derived Thyroid Carcinoma. Endocr. Pathol. 2020, 31, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Aghajani, M.J.; Roberts, T.L.; Yang, T.; McCafferty, C.E.; Caixeiro, N.J.; DeSouza, P.; Niles, N. Elevated Levels of Soluble PD-L1 Are Associated with Reduced Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Endocr. Connect. 2019, 8, 1040–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  188. Schürch, C.M.; Roelli, M.A.; Forster, S.; Wasmer, M.-H.; Brühl, F.; Maire, R.S.; Di Pancrazio, S.; Ruepp, M.-D.; Giger, R.; Perren, A.; et al. Targeting CD47 in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma Enhances Tumor Phagocytosis by Macrophages and Is a Promising Therapeutic Strategy. Thyroid 2019, 29, 979–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Yao, D.; Xia, J.; Li, J.; Xu, J. CD47 Is Associated with the Up-Regulation of the PD-1 Oncogenic Signaling Pathway. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2018, 11, 5612–5621. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  190. Courageot, M.-P.; Duca, L.; Martiny, L.; Devarenne-Charpentier, E.; Morjani, H.; El Btaouri, H. Thrombospondin-1 Receptor CD47 Overexpression Contributes to P-Glycoprotein-Mediated Multidrug Resistance Against Doxorubicin in Thyroid Carcinoma FTC-133 Cells. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 551228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Cameselle-Teijeiro, J.M.; Eloy, C.; Sobrinho-Simões, M. Pitfalls in Challenging Thyroid Tumors: Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis and Ancillary Biomarkers. Endocr. Pathol. 2020, 31, 197–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Oh, E.J.; Bychkov, A.; Cho, H.; Kim, T.-M.; Bae, J.S.; Lim, D.-J.; Jung, C.K. Prognostic Implications of CD10 and CD15 Expression in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Nakazawa, T.; Kondo, T.; Vuong, H.G.; Odate, T.; Kawai, M.; Tahara, I.; Kasai, K.; Inoue, T.; Oishi, N.; Mochizuki, K.; et al. High Expression of CD10 in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinomas. Histopathology 2018, 73, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Ameri, F.; Mokhtari, M. Diagnostic Value of CD-10 Marker in Differentiating of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma from Benign Thyroid Lesions. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2014, 3, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Ohta, M.; Ookoshi, T.; Naiki, H.; Imamura, Y. HBME-1 and CD15 Immunocytochemistry in the Follicular Variant of Thyroid Papillary Carcinoma: Immunocytochemistry in Thyroid Cancer. Pathol. Int. 2015, 65, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Imamura, Y.; Fukuda, M. CD15 (C3D-1) Immunoreactivity in Normal, Benign, and Malignant Thyroid Lesions. Appl. Immunohistochem. 1998, 6, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Mai, K.T.; Ford, J.C.; Yazdi, H.M.; Garth Perkins, D.; Susan Commons, A. Immunohistochemical Study of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma and Possible Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma-Related Benign Thyroid Nodules. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2000, 196, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Bychkov, A.; Jung, C.K. Aberrant Expression of CD20 in Thyroid Cancer and Its Clinicopathologic Significance. Hum. Pathol. 2018, 71, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Sasaki, Y.; Seto, M.; Miyoshi, H.; Okada, S.; Yokoyama, S.; Ohshima, A.; Ohshima, K. Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Expressing CD20: CD20-Positive Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Pathol. Int. 2017, 67, 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Trovato, M.; Villari, D.; Ruggeri, R.M.; Quattrocchi, E.; Fragetta, F.; Simone, A.; Scarfi, R.; Magro, G.; Batolo, D.; Trimarchi, F.; et al. Expression of CD30 Ligand and CD30 Receptor in Normal Thyroid and Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules. Thyroid 2001, 11, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Kim, H.M.; Koo, J.S. Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cancer Stem Cell Marker Expression in Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Gasbarri, A.; Martegani, M.P.; Del Prete, F.; Lucante, T.; Natali, P.G.; Bartolazzi, A. Galectin-3 and CD44v6 Isoforms in the Preoperative Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules. JCO 1999, 17, 3494–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Bartolazzi, A.; Gasbarri, A.; Papotti, M.; Bussolati, G.; Lucante, T.; Khan, A.; Inohara, H.; Marandino, F.; Orlandi, F.; Nardi, F.; et al. Application of an Immunodiagnostic Method for Improving Preoperative Diagnosis of Nodular Thyroid Lesions. Lancet 2001, 357, 1644–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Tastekin, E.; Keskin, E.; Can, N.; Canberk, S.; Mut, A.; Erdogan, E.; Asa, N.; Güldiken, S.; Sezer, A.; Azatcam, M. CD56, CD57, HBME1, CK19, Galectin-3 and P63 Immunohistochemical Stains in Differentiating Diagnosis of Thyroid Benign/Malign Lesions and NIFTP. Pol. J. Pathol. 2019, 70, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  205. Solmaz, O.A. Diagnostic Importance of CD56 with Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in Suspected Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Cases. CytoJournal 2018, 15, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Pyo, J.-S.; Kim, D.-H.; Yang, J. Diagnostic Value of CD56 Immunohistochemistry in Thyroid Lesions. Int. J. Biol. Markers 2018, 33, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Khan, A.; Baker, S.P.; Patwardhan, N.A.; Pullman, J.M. CD57 (Leu-7) Expression Is Helpful in Diagnosis of the Follicular Variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 1998, 432, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Jeong, Y.M.; Cho, H.; Kim, T.-M.; Kim, Y.; Jeon, S.; Bychkov, A.; Jung, C.K. CD73 Overexpression Promotes Progression and Recurrence of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Folpe, A.L.; Lloyd, R.V.; Bacchi, C.E.; Rosai, J. Spindle Epithelial Tumor With Thymus-like Differentiation: A Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Genetic Study of 11 Cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2009, 33, 1179–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Aydin, O.; Yildiz, L.; Kefeli, M.; Kandemir, B. CD117 Expression in Normal, Neoplastic, Inflammatory, and Reactive Lesions of the Thyroid. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2008, 204, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Pusztaszeri, M.P.; Sadow, P.M.; Faquin, W.C. CD117: A Novel Ancillary Marker for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies: CD117 in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014, 122, 596–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Murakawa, T.; Tsuda, H.; Tanimoto, T.; Tanabe, T.; Kitahara, S.; Matsubara, O. Expression of KIT, EGFR, HER-2 and Tyrosine Phosphorylation in Undifferentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Implication for a New Therapeutic Approach. Pathol. Int. 2005, 55, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Abrosimov, A.; Saenko, V.; Meirmanov, S.; Nakashima, M.; Rogounovitch, T.; Shkurko, O.; Lushnikov, E.; Mitsutake, N.; Namba, H.; Yamashita, S. The Cytoplasmic Expression of MUC1 in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma of Different Histological Variants and Its Correlation with Cyclin D1 Overexpression. Endocr. Pathol. 2007, 18, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Morari, E.C.; Silva, J.R.; Guilhen, A.C.T.; Cunha, L.L.; Marcello, M.A.; Soares, F.A.; Vassallo, J.; Ward, L.S. Muc-1 Expression May Help Characterize Thyroid Nodules but Does Not Predict Patients’ Outcome. Endocr. Pathol. 2010, 21, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Renaud, F.; Gnemmi, V.; Devos, P.; Aubert, S.; Crépin, M.; Coppin, L.; Ramdane, N.; Bouchindhomme, B.; d’Herbomez, M.; Van Seuningen, I.; et al. MUC1 Expression in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Is Associated with BRAF Mutation and Lymph Node Metastasis; the Latter Is the Most Important Risk Factor of Relapse. Thyroid 2014, 24, 1375–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Liu, H.; Moy, P.; Kim, S.; Xia, Y.; Rajasekaran, A.; Navarro, V.; Knudsen, B.; Bander, N.H. Monoclonal Antibodies to the Extracellular Domain of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Also React with Tumor Vascular Endothelium. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 3629–3634. [Google Scholar]
  217. Silver, D.A.; Pellicer, I.; Fair, W.R.; Heston, W.D.; Cordon-Cardo, C. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Normal and Malignant Human Tissues. Clin. Cancer Res. 1997, 3, 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  218. Bychkov, A.; Vutrapongwatana, U.; Tepmongkol, S.; Keelawat, S. PSMA Expression by Microvasculature of Thyroid Tumors—Potential Implications for PSMA Theranostics. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Heitkötter, B.; Steinestel, K.; Trautmann, M.; Grünewald, I.; Barth, P.; Gevensleben, H.; Bögemann, M.; Wardelmann, E.; Hartmann, W.; Rahbar, K.; et al. Neovascular PSMA Expression Is a Common Feature in Malignant Neoplasms of the Thyroid. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 9867–9874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Sollini, M.; di Tommaso, L.; Kirienko, M.; Piombo, C.; Erreni, M.; Lania, A.G.; Erba, P.A.; Antunovic, L.; Chiti, A. PSMA Expression Level Predicts Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Aggressiveness and Patient Outcome. EJNMMI Res. 2019, 9, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  221. Ciappuccini, R.; Saguet-Rysanek, V.; Giffard, F.; Licaj, I.; Dorbeau, M.; Clarisse, B.; Poulain, L.; Bardet, S. PSMA Expression in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Association with Radioiodine, 18FDG Uptake, and Patient Outcome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, 3536–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Genutis, L.K.; Tomsic, J.; Bundschuh, R.A.; Brock, P.L.; Williams, M.D.; Roychowdhury, S.; Reeser, J.W.; Frankel, W.L.; Alsomali, M.; Routbort, M.J.; et al. Microsatellite Instability Occurs in a Subset of Follicular Thyroid Cancers. Thyroid 2019, 29, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Migdalska-Sęk, M.; Czarnecka, K.H.; Kusiński, M.; Pastuszak-Lewandoska, D.; Nawrot, E.; Kuzdak, K.; Brzeziańska-Lasota, E. Clinicopathological Significance of Overall Frequency of Allelic Loss (OFAL) in Lesions Derived from Thyroid Follicular Cell. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 2019, 23, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  224. Wong, K.S.; Lorch, J.H.; Alexander, E.K.; Nehs, M.A.; Nowak, J.A.; Hornick, J.L.; Barletta, J.A. Clinicopathologic Features of Mismatch Repair-Deficient Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinomas. Thyroid 2019, 29, 666–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Paulsson, J.O.; Backman, S.; Wang, N.; Stenman, A.; Crona, J.; Thutkawkorapin, J.; Ghaderi, M.; Tham, E.; Stålberg, P.; Zedenius, J.; et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing of Synchronous Thyroid Carcinomas Identifies Aberrant DNA Repair in Thyroid Cancer Dedifferentiation. J. Pathol. 2020, 250, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. De la Chapelle, A.; Hampel, H. Clinical Relevance of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 3380–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Frequency and pattern of genetic alterations across thyroid tumors. The heatmap depicts the frequency of non-synonymous mutations, deletions and fusions in selected genes, and copy number alterations (CNA). NH, nodular hyperplasia; FA, follicular adenoma; OA, oncocytic adenoma; NIFTP, non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; HTT, hyalinizing trabecular tumor; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma; OCA, oncocytic carcinoma; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; OCA, oncocytic carcinoma; PDTC, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma; ATC, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; and HMT, histone methyltransferase. References for information used in this figure can be found in Table S1.
Figure 1. Frequency and pattern of genetic alterations across thyroid tumors. The heatmap depicts the frequency of non-synonymous mutations, deletions and fusions in selected genes, and copy number alterations (CNA). NH, nodular hyperplasia; FA, follicular adenoma; OA, oncocytic adenoma; NIFTP, non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; HTT, hyalinizing trabecular tumor; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma; OCA, oncocytic carcinoma; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; OCA, oncocytic carcinoma; PDTC, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma; ATC, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; and HMT, histone methyltransferase. References for information used in this figure can be found in Table S1.
Cancers 14 00204 g001
Figure 2. Genetic evolution of differentiated thyroid cancers. PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma; OCA, oncocytic carcinoma; and ATC, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma.
Figure 2. Genetic evolution of differentiated thyroid cancers. PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma; OCA, oncocytic carcinoma; and ATC, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma.
Cancers 14 00204 g002
Figure 3. Diagnostic performance of commercially available molecular panels for thyroid nodules with indeterminate FNA cytology (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance and follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm). The length of the error bars is a 95% confidence interval. These data were obtained from clinical validation studies of Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier (GSC) [118], ThyroSeq v3 Genomic Classifier (GC) [119], ThyGeNEXT and ThyraMIR [117], and RosettaGX Reveal [120]. NIFTP, non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; NPV, negative predictive value; and PPV, positive predictive value.
Figure 3. Diagnostic performance of commercially available molecular panels for thyroid nodules with indeterminate FNA cytology (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance and follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm). The length of the error bars is a 95% confidence interval. These data were obtained from clinical validation studies of Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier (GSC) [118], ThyroSeq v3 Genomic Classifier (GC) [119], ThyGeNEXT and ThyraMIR [117], and RosettaGX Reveal [120]. NIFTP, non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; NPV, negative predictive value; and PPV, positive predictive value.
Cancers 14 00204 g003
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 in thyroid tumors. Different Ki-67 labeling indices are observed in follicular adenoma (a, 2%), follicular thyroid carcinoma (b, 4%), papillary thyroid carcinoma (c, 5%), poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (d, 20%), and high-grade papillary thyroid carcinoma (e, 35%) coexisting with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (f, 40%). ×400 (af). Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 in thyroid tumors. Different Ki-67 labeling indices are observed in follicular adenoma (a, 2%), follicular thyroid carcinoma (b, 4%), papillary thyroid carcinoma (c, 5%), poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (d, 20%), and high-grade papillary thyroid carcinoma (e, 35%) coexisting with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (f, 40%). ×400 (af). Scale bar = 50 μm.
Cancers 14 00204 g004
Figure 5. Immunohistochemical detection of mutations in thyroid cancer. (a) BRAF VE1 immunostaining in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) with BRAF V600E mutation. (b) Pan-TRK immunostaining in PTC with RBPMS-NTRK3 fusion. (c) Cribriform morular thyroid carcinoma showing nuclear expression of β-catenin. (d) ALK immunostaining in PTC with EML4-ALK fusion. ×400 (ad). Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 5. Immunohistochemical detection of mutations in thyroid cancer. (a) BRAF VE1 immunostaining in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) with BRAF V600E mutation. (b) Pan-TRK immunostaining in PTC with RBPMS-NTRK3 fusion. (c) Cribriform morular thyroid carcinoma showing nuclear expression of β-catenin. (d) ALK immunostaining in PTC with EML4-ALK fusion. ×400 (ad). Scale bar = 50 μm.
Cancers 14 00204 g005
Figure 6. PD-L1 expression in papillary thyroid carcinoma. (a) Diffuse expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells (×100). (b) A high-power view shows the membranous staining for PD-L1 in cancer cells (×400). Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 6. PD-L1 expression in papillary thyroid carcinoma. (a) Diffuse expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells (×100). (b) A high-power view shows the membranous staining for PD-L1 in cancer cells (×400). Scale bar = 50 μm.
Cancers 14 00204 g006
Figure 7. Immunohistochemical expression of CD markers by the thyroid cancer cells. CD10 expression in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC, a) and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (b), CD15 expression in PTC (c), CD20 expression in PTC (d), loss of CD56 expression in PTC (e), and CD73 expression in PTC (f). ×400 (ad,f). ×200 (e). Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 7. Immunohistochemical expression of CD markers by the thyroid cancer cells. CD10 expression in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC, a) and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (b), CD15 expression in PTC (c), CD20 expression in PTC (d), loss of CD56 expression in PTC (e), and CD73 expression in PTC (f). ×400 (ad,f). ×200 (e). Scale bar = 50 μm.
Cancers 14 00204 g007
Table 1. Familial thyroid tumors.
Table 1. Familial thyroid tumors.
Familial Thyroid CancerGermline MutationHistologyReferences
Familial non-MTCHABP2, SRRM2, FOXE1, DUOX2, SRGAP1, TITF-1/NKX2.1, MNG1, PTCSC3, and CHEK2NH, FA, PTC, and FTC[103,104]
Familial PTC with papillary renal cell neoplasiaPRNPTC[101,102,105]
Familial adenomatous polyposisAPCPTC-CMV[101,102,105]
Cowden syndromePTEN, SDHB-D, PIK3CA, AKT1, KLLN, and SEC23BPTC-FV, FTC, FA, NH, and C-cell hyperplasia[52,53,54,101,102,105]
Carney complexPRKAR1 αPTC, FTC, FA, and NH[101,102,105]
Werner syndromeWRNPTC, FTC, and ATC[101,102,105]
McCune–Albright syndromeGNASPTC, FTC, and FA with papillary growth[102]
DICER1 syndromeDICER1NH, PTC, and FTC[39]
MEN and FMTCRETMTC[102,105]
ATC, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma; FA, follicular adenoma; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; NH, nodular hyperplasia; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; PTC-CMV, papillary thyroid carcinoma, cribriform morular variant; PTC-FV, papillary thyroid carcinoma, follicular variant; MEN, multiple endocrine neoplasia; and FMTC, familial medullary thyroid carcinoma.
Table 2. Targeted drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for thyroid cancer [128].
Table 2. Targeted drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for thyroid cancer [128].
DrugsThyroid CancersTargets
Multikinase Inhibitors
SorafenibRAI-refractory DTCVEGFR, PDGFR, and BRAF
LenvatinibRAI-refractory DTCVEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, c-Kit, and RET
VandetanibMTCVEGFR2, EGFR, and RET
CabozantinibMTCc-MET, RET, VEGFR2, and AXL
BRAF kinase inhibitors
VemurafenibBRAF V600E mutated cancerBRAF V600E and CRAF-1
DabrafenibBRAF V600E mutated ATCBRAF V600E and CRAF
MEK inhibitors
SelumetinibRAI-refractory DTCMEK1 and MEK2
Trametinib combined with dabrafenibATCMEK1 and MEK2
NTRK inhibitors
Larotrectinib and entrectinibNTRK fusion-positive cancerTrkA, TrkB, and TrkC
RET kinase inhibitors
Selpercatinib (LOXO-292)RET mutation or fusion-positive cancerRET, RET mutants V804M, and G810R
Pralsetinib (BLU-667)Advanced or metastatic RET-mutant MTC and RET-fusion-positive thyroid cancerRET, RET mutants V804L, V804M, M918T, and CCDC6-RET fusion
ATC, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma; DTC, differentiated thyroid carcinoma; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; and RAI, radioactive iodine.
Table 3. Immunohistochemistry for the detection of molecular alterations in thyroid cancer.
Table 3. Immunohistochemistry for the detection of molecular alterations in thyroid cancer.
Molecular AlterationTarget Protein (Clone)Tumor TypeUtility
BRAF V600EBRAF V600E (clone VE1)Subset of PTC, PDTC, and ATCDiagnostic, prognostic, and predictive
APC (germline or somatic) or CTNNB1β-cateninCribriform-morular PTC and PTC with fibromatosis/ fasciitis-like stromaDiagnostic
RAS mutationsPan-RAS Q61R (clone SP174), including NRAS Q61R, KRAS Q61R, and HRAS Q61R FA, OA, FTC, OCA, NIFTP, subset of PTC, hyperplastic nodules, and MTCDiagnostic
PTEN inactivationPTENPTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome, FA, FTC, follicular variant of PTC, NIFTP, hyperplastic nodules, PDTC, ATC, OA, and OCADiagnostic
NTRK rearrangementsPan-TRKPTC and secretory carcinomaDiagnostic and predictive
ALK rearrangementALK (clones 5A4 and D5F3)PTC, PDTC, ATC, and MTCDiagnostic and predictive
ATC, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma; FA, follicular adenoma; OA, oncocytic adenoma; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma; OCA, oncocytic carcinoma; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; NIFTP, non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; PDTC, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma; and PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Table 4. CD marker expression in thyroid lesions.
Table 4. CD marker expression in thyroid lesions.
CD MarkerGene SymbolGene NameAlias Gene SymbolsNormal ThyroidBenign NodulesNIFTPMalignancyPrognostic FactorReferences
CD5CD5CD5 moleculeLEU1 and T10%0%0%ITC (100%)n/d[191]
CD10MMEMembrane metalloendopeptidaseCALLA, CD10, and NEP0%0–22%n/dPTC (30–47%, F), FTC (27%, F)
ATC (96%, D), and MTC (0%)
n/s[192,193,194]
CD15FUT4Fucosyltransferase 4CD15, FCT3A, ELFT, and FUC-TIV0%0–10%n/dPTC (57–85%), FTC (4–40%), MTC (20%), and ATC (0%)Excellent therapeutic outcomes to RAI in PTC[192,195,196,197]
CD20MS4A1Membrane spanning 4-domains A1CD20, B1, Bp35, and MS4A20%0%n/dPTC (8–23%), PDTC (13%), ATC (0%), and MTC (0%)n/s[198,199]
CD30TNFRSF8TNF receptor superfamily member 8CD30, D1S166E, and KI-10%<40%n/dPTC (67%), FTC (7%), ATC (33%), and MTC (67%)n/d[200]
CD44CD44CD44 molecule (Indian blood group)MIC4, MDU2, MDU3, IN, MC56, Pgp1, CD44R, HCELL, and CSPG80%n/dn/dPTC (80%)Shorter PFS in PTC[201]
CD44v6 0%30–40%n/dPTC (70–97%) FTC (80–90%), PDTC (55%), ATC (40–75%), and MTC (14%)n/d[202,203]
CD56NCAM1Neural cell adhesion molecule 1NCAM and CD56100%>90%10–100%PTC (<20%) and FTC (20–90%)n/s[204,205,206]
CD57B3GAT1Beta-1,3-glucuronyltransferase 1CD57, LEU7, GlcAT-P, HNK-1, and NK-10%10–20%85%PTC (>90%), FTC (>90%)n/d[197,204,207]
CD73NT5E5′-nucleotidase ectoNT5, CD73, eN, eNT, and CALJA0%n/dn/dPTC (72%)Shorter RFS in PTC[208]
CD99CD99CD99 molecule (Xg blood group)MIC20%0%0%SETTLE (75%)n/d[191,209]
CD117KITKIT proto-oncogene and receptor tyrosine kinasePBT, CD117, SCFR, and C-Kit8–100%8–100%n/dPTC (0–71%), FTC (47%), ATC (40%), ITC (100%), and SETTLE (75%)n/s[191,209,210,211,212]
CD166ALCAMActivated leukocyte cell adhesion moleculeCD166 and MEMD0%n/dn/dPTC (12%)Shorter PFS in PTC[201]
CD227MUC1Mucin 1, cell surface associatedPUM, MCKD1, CD227, PEM, ADMCKD, ADMCKD1, MCKD, and MCD6%21–30%n/dPTC (49–80%), FTC (49%)Adverse prognosis in PTC (conflicting data)[213,214,215]
Gene names and symbols follow the guidelines of gene nomenclature by the Human Genome Organization (HUGO) Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC). D, diffuse staining; F, focal staining; RAI, radioactive iodine; RFS, recurrence-free survival; PFS, progression-free survival; n/d, no data; n/s, not significant; ITC, intrathyroid thymic carcinoma; and SETTLE, spindle epithelial tumor with thymus-like differentiation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Agarwal, S.; Bychkov, A.; Jung, C.-K. Emerging Biomarkers in Thyroid Practice and Research. Cancers 2022, 14, 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010204

AMA Style

Agarwal S, Bychkov A, Jung C-K. Emerging Biomarkers in Thyroid Practice and Research. Cancers. 2022; 14(1):204. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010204

Chicago/Turabian Style

Agarwal, Shipra, Andrey Bychkov, and Chan-Kwon Jung. 2022. "Emerging Biomarkers in Thyroid Practice and Research" Cancers 14, no. 1: 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010204

APA Style

Agarwal, S., Bychkov, A., & Jung, C. -K. (2022). Emerging Biomarkers in Thyroid Practice and Research. Cancers, 14(1), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010204

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop