Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment before Prostate Cancer Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Validation of Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems for Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Thyroid Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel Treatment for Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Peritoneal Dissemination Provides a Survival Benefit
Previous Article in Special Issue
Emerging Biomarkers in Thyroid Practice and Research
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comprehensive Analysis of the Prognosis and Drug Sensitivity of Differentiation-Related lncRNAs in Papillary Thyroid Cancer

1
Thyroid Surgery Department, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
2
National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(5), 1353; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051353
Submission received: 21 December 2021 / Revised: 1 March 2022 / Accepted: 2 March 2022 / Published: 7 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers of Thyroid Cancer)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Merging evidence has indicated that dedifferentiation is the main concern associated with radioactive iodine (RAI) refractoriness in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), and the underlying mechanisms of PTC dedifferentiation remain unclear. This study systematically delineated the expression pattern, tumor immune microenvironment, drug sensitivity, and prognostic value of differentiation-related lncRNAs. It also demonstrated that DPH6-DT could be considered as a novel signature to indicate differentiation and promote TC progression via activating the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway.

Abstract

Dedifferentiation is the main concern associated with radioactive iodine (RAI) refractoriness in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), and the underlying mechanisms of PTC dedifferentiation remain unclear. The present work aimed to identify a useful signature to indicate dedifferentiation and further explore its role in prognosis and susceptibility to chemotherapy drugs. A total of five prognostic-related DR-lncRNAs were selected to establish a prognostic-predicting model, and corresponding risk scores were closely associated with the infiltration of immune cells and immune checkpoint blockade. Moreover, we built an integrated nomogram based on DR-lncRNAs and age that showed a strong ability to predict the 3- and 5-year overall survival. Interestingly, drug sensitivity analysis revealed that the low-risk group was more sensitive to Bendamustine and TAS-6417 than the high-risk group. In addition, knockdown of DR-lncRNAs (DPH6-DT) strongly promoted cell proliferation, invasion, and migration via PI3K-AKT signal pathway in vitro. Furthermore, DPH6-DT downregulation also increased the expression of vimentin and N-cadherin during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. This study firstly confirms that DR-lncRNAs play a vital role in the prognosis and immune cells infiltration in patients with PTC, as well as a predictor of the drugs’ chemosensitivity. Based on our results, DR-lncRNAs can serve as a promising prognostic biomarkers and treatment targets.

1. Introduction

The incidence of thyroid cancer (TC) has been increasing in recent years and papillary TC (PTC) is the most frequent histological type that derives from follicular cells, accounting for up to 85% of cases [1]. Although the vast majority of patients with PTC have a favorable prognosis via reasonable treatments, including thyroidectomy, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppressive therapy, and radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy, approximately 10–20% of PTCs suffer from disease recurrence and progress to distant metastasis during follow-up [2]. Among these patients, dedifferentiation is the main reason that leads to PTC transform into poorly differentiated or anaplastic TC (ATC) with poor clinical outcome. At present, the treatment options for these patients are limited, and the molecular mechanisms of PTC dedifferentiation remain unclear.
Recently, an increasing number of studies have reported that genetic and epigenetic aberrations [3,4], cancer stem cells [5], microRNAs [6], immunometabolic networks [7], and autophagy [8,9] play a critical role in PTC dedifferentiation and RAI resistance. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA), defined as a series of transcripts greater than 200 nucleotides, have been regarded as crucial regulators at various levels of transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and translational regulation. They are extensively involved in carcinogenesis, chromatin dynamics, interactions with mRNAs and proteins, differentiation, and embryonic development in patients with TC [10,11]. Notably, several studies proved that lncRNA could effectively modulate NF-κB and PI3K-AKT signaling pathways, thus affecting tumorigenesis [12,13], and lncRNACDC6 could serve as ceRNA to target CDC6 by sponging micro-225 to promote breast cancer progression [14]. At the same time, impairment or disturbances in lncRNA expression result in increased chemoresistance [15]. LncRNA CRNDE directly binds to SRSF6 and reduces the alternative splicing of PICALM, thereby mediating chemoresistance in gastric cancer [16]. Therefore, lncRNA can be considered a prognostic and therapeutic marker for cancer.
Some studies [17,18,19,20] revealed that lncRNA served as a potentially useful biomarker for the malignant thyroid nodule diagnoses, prognosis prediction, and treatment response of PTCs. Our previous study demonstrated that PTCSC3, as a tumor suppressor, was associated with prognosis in TC [19]. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that lncRNA function as biomarker for TC diagnosis and lymph nodes metastasis prediction [21]. However, differentiation-related lncRNA (DR-lncRNA) mediating PTC dedifferentiation patterns is not yet fully elucidated.
Currently, tumor microenvironment (TME) has received extensive attention. Within the TME of TC, tumor cells interact with immune cell infiltration and coordinate the immune response that induces tumor dedifferentiation to promote PTC progression [22,23,24]. The proportions of immune cells, such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), are closely related to the extent of differentiation [25,26]. Inhibition of intratumoral TAM recruitment might be able to restore RAI sensitivity in poorly differentiated TC [27]. In addition, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) elicits durable and effective responses in solid tumors [28]. Anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies were effective in inhibiting ATC progression and improved survival dramatically [29]. Thus, better understanding the role of TME involved in PTC dedifferentiation and the development of new biomarkers to choose patients for ICB treatment is definitely required.
In this study, we performed a multi-step analysis to identify the prognostic significance of DR-lncRNAs based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets and established an integrated nomogram to improve prognostic risk stratification. Furthermore, we explored the correlation between the corresponding risk score, TME, and drug sensitivity. More importantly, functional and molecular experiments were performed to validate the function of DR-lncRNAs. These results might be able to identify useful signatures which indicate dedifferentiation. These signatures may assist us in evaluating disease prognosis and therapeutic decisions for patients with PTC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects and Data Acquisition

We downloaded the RNA-Seq dataset and matched clinical information (including age, gender, histological type, bilaterality, multifocality, T stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and survival time) from University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) Xena, available online: http://xena.ucsc.edu/ (accessed on 2 October 2021). The samples with survival time less than 30 days or incomplete clinical data were excluded from the study. Finally, 492 TC and 58 normal samples from TCGA database were enrolled. Whole-transcriptome sequencing data was performed using FPKM expression level in transcripts per million (TPM). The median absolute deviation (MAD) was calculated to exclude genes with high variability [30]. LncRNAs with MAD > 0.5 were excluded from the RNA-Seq matrix. LncRNAs with an expression level of 0 or no clear name annotation were also excluded. In total, 1636 lncRNAs were enrolled.
According to published literature [31], there were 16 differentiation-related regulators, including NKX2-1, DUOX1-2, PAX8, SLC5A5, SLC5A8, SLC26A4, FOXE1, TG, TSHR, THRA, THRB, DIO1-2, GLIS3, and TPO. The microarray dataset GSE33630 comprising 11 anaplastic TC, 49 PTC, and 45 normal samples, was downloaded from GEO database. This dataset is based on the GPL570 (HG-U133_Plus_2) Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array [32], was used to validate the differential expression of DR-lncRNAs. The workflow is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) Network

To analyze the potential relationship between differentiation-related gene regulators, the STRING database [33] was used to construct a PPI network and then screen out the hub genes. A minimum gene interaction score of 0.4 was set as a threshold for genes at the center of the PPI network.

2.3. Construction of the Prognostic Risk Assessment Model

First, Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed to filter the DR-lncRNAs based on the threshold criteria of Pearson’s coefficient |R2| > 0.5 and p < 0.001. Then, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression was used to select candidate prognostic DR-lncRNAs. The corresponding coefficient criteria and optimal penalty parameter lambda were determined through 10-fold cross-validation based on the minimum criteria. Subsequently, an ideal prognostic model was established. The risk score for each patient was calculated as follows: risk score = i = 1 n c o e f ( i ) * a ( i ) , where a(i) represents the expression of DR-lncRNAs, and c o e f ( i ) is the coefficient. The patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the median risk score.

2.4. GO and KEGG Pathway Enrichment Functional Analysis

To reveal the functions of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in high- and low-risk score groups. Differentially expressed mRNAs were normalized and analyzed by using the “limma” package. p values < 0.05 and |log2FC| ≥ 1 were used as thresholds. GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis were visualized by Metascape [34] (http://metascape.org, accessed on 2 October 2021).

2.5. Evaluation of Immune Infiltration and the Expression of Immune Checkpoints

Cell type identification by estimating relative subsets of RNA transcripts (CIBERSORT) [35] was used to calculate the enrichment scores of the fraction of 22 immune cell types for each sample. The single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) [36] was performed to quantify the enrichment level of 29 infiltrating immune cells, and MCP counter algorithms [37] were utilized to assess the proportion of immune cells. Furthermore, we compared the expression of immune checkpoint molecules (PD-1, PD-L1, TNFSF9, IDO2, CD80, D44, CD27, and CD160) in the low-risk score group and high-risk score group.

2.6. Drug Susceptibility Prediction

The CellMiner database [38] is based on the IC50 of over 20,000 compounds and 60 cancer cells listed by the National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Research Center (NCI-60). Drugs under clinical trials and FDA-approved drugs were obtained. Spearman correlation analysis was utilized to determine the relationship between differentiation-related genes and drug sensitivity, and a box plot was drawn. The threshold criteria of Pearson’s coefficient > 0.6 and p value < 0.01 were considered statistically significant.

2.7. Tissue, Cell Lines, and Cell Transfection

Twenty paired PTC samples and adjacent normal tissues were collected from patients who underwent thyroidectomy in the Thyroid Surgery Department of Xiangya hospital from March 2020 to June 2020, and then preserved in the refrigerator at −80 °C. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants and approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (No. 202004192). Human TC cells (BCPA-P, TPC-1, IHH-4, K-1, KTC-1, WRO, BHT-101, FRO, and 8305 C) and normal human thyroid cells (Nthy-ori-3-1) were purchased from the Tumor Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Medical Science. Cell were maintained in RPMI 1640 or high glucose DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% streptomycin/penicillin at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting DPH6-DT was synthesized and designed by RiboBio company (Guanzhou, China). KTC-1 and IHH-4 cells were grown to 30% to 40% confluence in a 6-well plate and then transfected with DPH6-DT siRNA mixed with riboFECTTMCP (Wuhan, China) Buffer and reagent according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

2.8. RNA Extraction and Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from the tissue samples and cell lines by using the AG RNAex Pro RNA extraction kit (AG21101, Changsha, China). The first-strand cDNA was synthesized with the Reverse Transcription kit (AG, Changsha, China). qRT-PCR analysis was carried out using the TBGreen Premix Pro Taq HS Qpcr Kit (Cat #AG11718, Changsha, China) on ABI7500 system. The sequence of primers was listed in Supplementary Table S1. The relative expression levels of each sample were calculated using the ΔΔCq method, and the results were expressed as 2−ΔΔCq.

2.9. Western Blotting

Total proteins were extracted and separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membrane was incubated in 5% low-fat milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with the rabbit antibodies against human E-cadherin, N-cadherin, vimentin, p-AKT, AKT, p-ERK, ERK, PI3K, and GAPDH (Servicebio, Wuhan, China) at 4 °C overnight and were then incubated with secondary antibodies at 1:5000 dilution. Finally, signals were visualized by an enhanced ECL kit (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) (original western blot see Figures S7 and S8).

2.10. Cell Counting Kit (CCK)-8 Assay

Approximately 5.0 × 103 cells per plate were seeded into 96-well plates with three replicates, and then incubated for 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. 10% CCK-8 solution (10 μL) was added and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The absorbance values were measured at 450 nm by using microplate detector (SpectraMax iDS, Shanghai, China).

2.11. 5-Ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU) Assay

Briefly, 4 × 104 cells were seeded into 24-well plates for one night and then incubated with 50 μM EdU buffer (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) for 2 h. The cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 10 min and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 15 min. Afterwards, the cells were stained with the Apollo reaction solution (200 μL) and Hoechst 33,342 (200 μL). The results were visualized by fluorescence microscopy (Olympus CKX53, Beijing, China).

2.12. Transwell Migration and Invasion Assay

4 × 104 cells were plated into upper chamber (24-well insert; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) with 200 μL of serum-free medium coated with or without Matrigel (1 mg/mL). The bottom chambers were filled with 500 μL RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS. After 24 h of incubation, cells in the upper chamber were removed by scraping with a cotton swab. Invasive or migrating cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The number of invasive or migrating cells was counted in five random fields under a microscope.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

Statistical tests were performed using SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R software (version 4.0.2). Continuous vriables were expressed as the mean and range, while categorical variables were expressed as count and percentage. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis were performed to identify independent prognostic factors and establish an integrated nomogram combining predictable clinicopathological factors and risk scores. The performance of model was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), concordance index (C-index), and a calibration curve. The clinical usefulness of the nomogram was evaluated using the decisions curve analysis (DCA). All tests were two-sided. The statistical significance was shown as follows: p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***).

3. Results

3.1. The Landscape of DR-lncRNA Regulators

To identify the functions and interaction of DR-lncRNA regulators in PTC, we analyzed the 58 normal tissues and 492 PTC tissues from the TCGA dataset and showed that most of the expressions of differentiation-related regulators were significantly lower in PTC, including PAX8, SLC5A5, SLC5A8, SLC26A4, FOXE1, TG, TSHR, THRA, THRB, DIO1-2, GLIS3, and TPO (all p < 0.001). Only NKX2-1 significantly overexpressed in PTC tissues (Figure 2A). Next, the PPI network showed that TSHR was a hub gene which could interact with the other 15 genes (Figure S1A). However, Pearson correlation analysis showed that TSHR had a weak correlation with other differentiation-related regulators. Interestingly, DOUX1 and DOUX2 had the strongest positive correlation (Figure S2B). Furthermore, to study the relationship between differentiation-related regulators and lncRNA, Pearson correlation analysis was used to screen out DR-lncRNAs based on the criterion of Pearson’s coefficient |R| > 0.5 and p < 0.001. A total of 116 DR-lncRNAs were uncovered. Among them, five DR-lncRNAs were demonstrated to be associated with overall survival (p < 0.05). The LASSO analysis was used to further filter prognosis-related DR-lncRNAs (Figure S2). Finally, five prognostic related DR-lncRNAs, including CASC15, LNC00900, AC055720-2, DPH6-DT, and TNRC6C-AS1, still showed strong prognostic value. Figure 2B showed CASC15 and TNRC6C-AS1 were negatively related with differentiation-related regulators, whereas the other three lncRNAs showed positive correlation. Likewise, all DR-lncRNAs were abnormally expressed in PTC (p < 0.001, Figure 2C). The above results indicated that these lncRNAs may be a key regulator in the term of differentiation.

3.2. Risk Score Was Associated with Prognosis and Tumor Immune Microenvironment

To assess the prognostic value of DR-lncRNAs in PTC, a prognostic model was constructed. The risk score of each PTC patient was calculated according to the following formula: risk score = (2.43 × CASC15) + (−2.22 × LNC00900) + (−0.87 × AC055720.2) + (3.71 × DPH6-DT) + (0.28 × TNRC6C-AS1). All PTC patients were then divided into the high-risk and low-risk groups based on the median risk score. Patients in the low-risk group had a longer survival time than high-risk subgroups (p < 0.001, Figure 3A). The distribution of the OS, OS status, and risk score was displayed in Figure 3B. Heatmap distribution revealed that the expression levels of LNC00900, AC055720.2, and TNRC6C-AS1 were significantly upregulated in the low-risk group, and a higher risk score was correlated with older age and higher tumor stage (Figure 3C). The AUC of risk score was 0.8742 (Figure 3D), indicating a good prediction performance. Regarding the immune microenvironment of PTC, CIBERSORT analysis revealed that the levels of eosinophils and activated DCs were significantly higher, whereas the levels of activated mast cells (MCs), resting MCs, and macrophages M2 were lower in the high-risk group compared with the low-risk group (Figure 4A). Utilizing the ssGSEA algorithm, we found T follicular helper cells, plasmacytoid DCs, immature DCs, and central memory CD8 T cells were plentiful in the low-risk group (Figure 4B). Additionally, MCP counter further confirmed the immune microenvironment’s association with risk score and revealed that the abundance of endothelial cells, neutrophils, and CD8+ T cells was distinctly higher in low-risk group (Figure 4C). These above data indicated risk score model could predict the prognosis and closely associated with the infiltration of immune cells.
In addition, the expression levels of PD-L1, TNFSF9, IDO2, and CD80 were significantly higher in the high-risk group than the low-risk group. However, patients with low-risk scores significantly elevated the expression level of PD-1, CD44, CD27, and CD160 (Figure S3). These discoveries suggested that risk scores might be used as a reference for different ICB therapies.

3.3. Functional and Pathway Enrichment Analysis

To further comprehend the biological mechanisms of DR-lncRNAs involved in PTC, we performed GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses with Metascape. The top nine GO terms were thyroid hormone generation, thyroid hormone metabolic process, hormone metabolic process, collagen-containing extracellular matrix, apical plasma membrane, basolateral plasma membrane, glycosaminoglycan binding, serine-type endopeptidase activity, and heparin binding (Figure S4A–C). KEGG analysis showed that cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), ECM-receptor interaction, tryptophan metabolism, glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis, and keratan sulfate were closely involved in PTC development (Figure S4D).

3.4. Drug Sensitivity Analysis

To determine the possible small molecules targeting differentiation-related regulators and further improve the clinical value of risk score model, we performed spearman correlation analysis to assess the correlation between drug sensitivity and differentiation-related regulators. Figure 5A showed the top 8 drugs with the most statistically significant differences (|Cor| ≥ 0.6 and p value < 0.01). We also compared the IC50 of drugs between the low- and high-risk groups. The results showed that the low-risk group was more sensitive to Bendamustine and TAS-6417 in targeting differentiation-related regulators than the high-risk group (Figure 5B). Figure S5 shows the structure of the drugs. These findings highlight that the model could be considered as a potential chemosensitivity predictor.

3.5. Construction of the DR-lncRNAs Prognosis Nomogram

To quantitatively evaluate the prognosis of PTC patients in clinical practice, we constructed an integrated nomogram by combining the several predictable clinical factors with the DR-lncRNA-based risk scores. Univariate analysis showed that risk score (p < 0.001), M1 stage (p = 0.026), T4 stage (p = 0.003), TNM III—IV stage (p < 0.01), and age (p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with the overall survival (OS) in patients with PTC. Further multivariate analysis showed that risk score (OR = 2.38; 95% CI, 1.45–4.25; and p < 0.001) and age (OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.08–1.23; and p < 0.001) were the independent prognostic factors (Table 1). Subsequently, an integrated nomogram for the OS prediction was constructed (Figure 6A). The AUC of 3-, and 5-year OS was 0.966 and 0.967, respectively (Figure 6B). Additionally, the calibration plots revealed that the integrated nomogram model was excellent at predicting 3- and 5-year OS (Figure 6C). Moreover, DCA curves showed the integrated nomogram could better predict the OS and had a more favorable clinical applicability than either age or risk score (Figure 6D). Taken as a whole, these results revealed the significant value of the integrated nomogram in prognosticating patients with PTC.

3.6. Validation of the Expression of DR-lncRNAs

To validate the expression levels of DR-lncRNAs, we selected the GSE33630 database to conduct difference analysis between TC and normal tissues. The results showed that LNC00900, AC055720-2, and TNRC6C-AS1 were upregulated in PTC tissues compared with ATC and normal tissues. Interestingly, the expression level of DPH6-DT significantly upregulated with an increase in differentiation degree. However, the expression level of CASC15 was negative correlation with differentiation level (Figure S6A), and patients with ATC have the highest risk scores (Figure S6B). For subsequent molecular and functional experiments, we used TC tissues and cell lines to perform RT-qPCR analysis for further validation. As anticipated, the expression of TNRC6C-AS1 and CASC15 was significantly higher (p < 0.001), whereas DPH6-DT was significantly lower in TC tissues (Figure 7A) and cell lines (Figure 7B) than normal tissues and cell lines. Figure 7C shows that only DPH6-DT was associated with the level of differentiation. TNRC6C-AS1 [39] and CASC15 [40] have been studied in PTC. Therefore, we chose DPH6-DT for further experiments.

3.7. Downregulation of DPH6-DT Promote Proliferation and Metastasis by Activating the PI3K-AKT Signaling Pathway

To explore the biological functions of DPH6-DT in TC, DPH6-DT was knocked down via transfecting three siRNAs. Among them, DPH6-DT-siRNA3 efficiently knocked down DPH6-DT expression (Figure 8A). CCK-8 assay showed that silencing DPH6-DT conspicuously enhanced cell viability (Figure 8B), and EdU assay revealed that deficiency of DPH6-DT dramatically increased PTC cell proliferation in IHH-4 and KTC-1 cells (Figure 8C). Likewise, invasion and migration were enhanced when DPH6-DT silenced (Figure 8D). Furthermore, we explored the underlying mechanism changes of DPH6-DT -knockdown in PTC. Western blot analysis showed that the depletion of DPH6-DT could increase AKT, p-AKT, and PI3K expression levels in IHH-4 and KTC-1 cells. However, no difference was observed in ERK and p-ERK. Furthermore, DPH6-DT downregulation also increased the expression of vimentin and N-cadherin during epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). These data suggested that ablation of DPH6-DT led to the activation of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in PTC.

4. Discussion

Over the past decade, RAI therapy has been considered an effective treatment that successfully ablates any metastatic tumor and residual thyroid tissue and contributes to excellent prognosis in patients with PTC [41]. However, dedifferentiation is the main concern associated with RAI refractoriness and dramatically decreased RAI uptake, which increase the risk of recurrence and PTC-related mortality [42]. Unfortunately, there are no definitive strategies to restore RAI avidity through thyroid-specific genes. Thus, our study utilized bioinformatic analysis to identify the prognostic significance of DR-lncRNAs, including CASC15, LNC00900, AC055720-2, DPH6-DT, and TNRC6C-AS1, which are closely associated with tumor differentiation. The corresponding risk score was established based on these DR-lncRNAs acting as a potential prognostic and chemosensitivity predictor. Moreover, the in vitro experiments further validate downregulation of DPH6-DT and promote proliferation and metastasis by activating the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway (Figure 9). These findings indicate that the signature can not only serve as a useful indicator of dedifferentiation, but also predict drug sensitivity and poor clinical outcomes in patients with PTC.
In recent years, numerous studies [43,44] have confirmed that tumor immune microenvironment plays a decisive role in tumor progression and therapeutic efficacy through the interaction and coevolution of the tumor stroma, immune cells, and tumor cells. Previous mainstream studies [23,45] have demonstrated that Tregs, TAMs, MCs, DCs, and neutrophils exert a tumor-promoting effect, and NK cells, CD8+ T cells, and B cells play an anti-tumor role. Our research used CIBERSORT, ssGSEA, and MCP counter to evaluate the level of immune cell infiltration to verify the previously reported results of immune cell functions and phenotypes in patients with PTC from the perspective of proportion and abundance (Figure 4), and partially supports the evidence that T follicular helper cell, central memory CD8 T cell, and immature DC were significantly increased in the low-risk group to exert an anti-tumor effect. Furthermore, immune checkpoints were considered as promising targets for PTC treatment that had entered clinical trials, including inhibition of PD-L1 (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab) and anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) [46]. An earlier study by Chowdhury [47] confirmed that the expression of PD-L1 was associated with aggressive clinicopathological markers and significantly reduced disease-free survival in PTC. Anti-PD-L1 therapy (pembrolizumab) has generated potential clinical benefits for advanced differentiated TC patients by inducing regression of aggressive tumors. Our research revealed that PD-L1, TNFSF9, IDO2, CD80, and CD70 were significantly higher in the high-risk group than the low-risk group. These discoveries suggested that risk scores might be used as a reference for different ICB therapies.
In addition, conventional anti-cancer treatments (radio- and chemotherapy) have been explored with the purpose of restoring RAI sensitivity in poorly differentiated TC patients. Initially, the PPARγ activators [48], histone deacetylase inhibitors [49], and inhibitors of iodide release [50] were demonstrated to be minimally effective in clinical trials. Recently, RAI treatment combined with inhibitors of MEK and BRAF kinases significantly improved clinical responses for RAI-refractory TC patients [27]. However, not all poorly differentiated TC patients benefit from the adjunctive treatments that meet the expectation for restoring RAI sensitivity. Therefore, additional efforts need to further optimize the clinical efficacy to induce TC redifferentiation. Functional and pathway enrichment analysis were performed to further comprehend the biological mechanisms about DR-lncRNA and revealed that CAMs, ECM-receptor interaction, tryptophan metabolism, glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis, and keratan sulfate were closely involved in PTC development. Moreover, the CellMiner database was widely used for cancer drug testing, which involved 20,503 compounds and 22,379 genes [38], and provides a new perspective of the treatment for TC patients with RAI-refractory TC. Our results demonstrated that Bendamustine and TAS-6417 were more sensitive in targeting differentiation-related regulators in the low-risk group than in the high-risk group. Among these agents, Bendamustine alone or combined with other antineoplastic agents was widely used in treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma [51]. Bendamustine and TAS-6417 have not been approved for TC treatment and their clinical efficacy is unknown to date. Therefore, large-cohort prospective clinical trials are necessary to validate drug efficacy in future research.
In the further analyses, we constructed an integrated nomogram by combining DR-lncRNAs risk scores with age to improve the accuracy of the prognostic prediction and risk stratification. The AUC and calibration plots indicated the nomogram model has advantageous usability in survival prediction. Currently, the TNM 8th edition was the most widely used to assess the prognosis of PTC and achieve great advancement in clinical practice [52], but it is difficult to distinguish patients with similar clinicopathologic characteristics for different survival outcomes, which caused low-risk patients to adopt a higher degree of TSH inhibition and unnecessary RAI treatment. Our study has discovered some prognosis-related DR-lncRNAs which contributed to prognostic judgement and decision-making for clinical treatment.
Finally, we validated the role of DR-lncRNAs in TC cell growth, proliferation, and dedifferentiation. Several studies [42,53] have reported some molecules and pathways involved in the dedifferentiation process of TC, including MAPK, P53, BRAF, EIF1AX, and histone methyltransferases. Ma and colleagues [54] demonstrated that the metabolic gene signature can be used as an indicator of the dedifferentiation biomarker for PTC. Similarly, Suh et al. [55] found that the deregulations of glucose metabolism could mediate dedifferentiation of PTC. Sara C. et al. [56] highlighted the FOXE1 as a novel differentiation-related gene which induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal and cell proliferation. In addition, genetic alterations in PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling pathways by chromosomal rearrangements or point mutations are vital drivers to silence the expression of differentiation-related genes, resulting in loss of RAI avidity [41,57]. Our study showed that DPH6-DT was significantly lower in TC tissues than normal tissues, and most of the expression of differentiation-related regulators were also significantly lower in TC. Figure 1 uncovered that the expression level of DHP6-DT was positively associated with differentiation-related regulators. At the same time, we validated that the expression level of DPH6-DT was significantly linked to TC differentiation degree (Figure 7). Silencing DPH6-DT dramatically promoted cell proliferation and metastasis by activating the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. The PI3K-AKT pathway has been well recognized as regulating cell differentiation via decreasing the expression of NIS in PTC. To our knowledge, this is the first study that revealed DPH6-DT could act as a useful signature to indicate differentiation and uncover the underlying molecular mechanism.
Undeniably, there are several limitations in the current study. First, the expression level of DR-lncRNAs was only validated in PTC and normal tissues, and it is difficult to acquire anaplastic and RAI-refractory TC tissue to verify the differentiation grade due to its low prevalence. Second, the integrated nomogram showed good performance in predicting prognosis. However, there are no additional databases to use for external validation. Future clinical research is necessary to confirm the validity of our survival prediction model. Third, because of the limited project funding, we performed functional and molecular experiments to uncover the underlying mechanism of PTC differentiation in vitro. The role of DPH6-DT and related pathways should be studied in depth in the context of differentiation in in vivo experiments. Lastly, the TCGA database mainly records the RNA-Seq and clinical data of European and North American populations [58], resulting in an inevitable selection bias.
In summary, this study systematically delineated the expression pattern, tumor immune microenvironment, drugs sensitivity, and prognostic value of DR-lncRNAs regulators, and revealed its great significance in prognosis prediction and clinical treatment strategy in patients with PTC. More importantly, we confirm that DPH6-DT could be considered as a novel signature to indicate differentiation and promote TC progression via activating the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, which provides crucial insight in early diagnosis and therapy to improve the poor clinical outcome of anaplastic and RAI-refractory TC patients.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers14051353/s1, Figure S1: (A) PPI network shows the relationship among differentiation-related regulators. (B) Pearson correlation analysis of the differentiation-related regulators. Figure S2: (A) Lasso regression of the 5 DR-lncRNAs, the lines represent the DR-lncRNA. (B) Cross-validation for tuning the parameter selection in the LASSO regression (λ = 5). Figure S3: The relationship between risk score and immune checkpoints blockade. Figure S4: GO and KEGG pathway enrichment functional analysis. (A) Biological process. (B) Cellular component. (C) Molecular function. (D) Pathway analysis. Figure S5: The structure of the chosen drugs. Figure S6: The GSE3360 database to validate the expression of DR-lncRNAs. (A,B) the expression of DR-lncRNAs among PTC, ATC, and normal tissues. ATC: anaplastic thyroid cancer. PTC: papillary thyroid cancer. Figure S7: original western blot. Figure S8: original western blot. Table S1: Quantitative real time PCR primers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.W. and N.B.; methodology, W.W.; formal analysis, W.W. and X.L.; investigation, X.L.; data curation, W.W. and N.B.; writing—original draft preparation, W.W.; writing—review and editing, W.W., N.B. and X.L.; visualization, W.W.; supervision, N.B. and X.L.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 82073262) and Innovative Foundation for graduate students of Hunan Province (grant No. 2020zzts259).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (No. 202004192).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We thank the TCGA and GEO database for gene expression and clinical data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, S.; Sun, K.; Zheng, R.; Zeng, H.; Wang, S.; Chen, R.; Wei, W.; He, J. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2015. J. Natl. Cancer Cent. 2021, 1, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, W.; Shen, C.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, B.; Bai, N.; Li, X. Identification and validation of potential novel biomarkers to predict distant metastasis in differentiated thyroid cancer. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021, 9, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Choi, Y.W.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, S.H.; Chwae, Y.J.; Lee, J.; Soh, E.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Park, T.J. B-RafV600E inhibits sodium iodide symporter expression via regulation of DNA methyltransferase 1. Exp. Mol. Med. 2014, 46, e120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Cheng, W.; Liu, R.; Zhu, G.; Wang, H.; Xing, M. Robust Thyroid Gene Expression and Radioiodine Uptake Induced by Simultaneous Suppression of BRAF V600E and Histone Deacetylase in Thyroid Cancer Cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 962–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hardin, H.; Montemayor-Garcia, C.; Lloyd, R.V. Thyroid cancer stem-like cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in thyroid cancers. Hum. Pathol. 2013, 44, 1707–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Riesco-Eizaguirre, G.; Wert-Lamas, L.; Perales-Paton, J.; Sastre-Perona, A.; Fernandez, L.P.; Santisteban, P. The miR-146b-3p/PAX8/NIS Regulatory Circuit Modulates the Differentiation Phenotype and Function of Thyroid Cells during Carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 4119–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Galdiero, M.R.; Varricchi, G.; Marone, G. The immune network in thyroid cancer. Oncoimmunology 2016, 5, e1168556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gewirtz, D.A. An autophagic switch in the response of tumor cells to radiation and chemotherapy. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 90, 208–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jin, S.M.; Jang, H.W.; Sohn, S.Y.; Kim, N.K.; Joung, J.Y.; Cho, Y.Y.; Kim, S.W.; Chung, J.H. Role of autophagy in the resistance to tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis in papillary and anaplastic thyroid cancer cells. Endocrine 2014, 45, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schaukowitch, K.; Kim, T.K. Emerging epigenetic mechanisms of long non-coding RNAs. Neuroscience 2014, 264, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sun, M.; Kraus, W.L. From discovery to function: The expanding roles of long noncoding RNAs in physiology and disease. Endocr. Rev. 2015, 36, 25–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Mirzaei, S.; Zarrabi, A.; Hashemi, F.; Zabolian, A.; Saleki, H.; Ranjbar, A.; Seyed Saleh, S.H.; Bagherian, M.; Sharifzadeh, S.O.; Hushmandi, K.; et al. Regulation of Nuclear Factor-KappaB (NF-kappaB) signaling pathway by non-coding RNAs in cancer: Inhibiting or promoting carcinogenesis? Cancer Lett. 2021, 509, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, W.; Yang, S.; Chen, D.; Yuwen, D.; Zhang, J.; Wei, X.; Han, X.; Guan, X. SOX2-OT induced by PAI-1 promotes triple-negative breast cancer cells metastasis by sponging miR-942-5p and activating PI3K/Akt signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2022, 79, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kong, X.; Duan, Y.; Sang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, N.; Yang, Q. LncRNA-CDC6 promotes breast cancer progression and function as ceRNA to target CDC6 by sponging microRNA-215. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 9105–9117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ashrafizaveh, S.; Ashrafizadeh, M.; Zarrabi, A.; Husmandi, K.; Zabolian, A.; Shahinozzaman, M.; Aref, A.R.; Hamblin, M.R.; Nabavi, N.; Crea, F.; et al. Long non-coding RNAs in the doxorubicin resistance of cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2021, 508, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, F.; Wang, H.; Yu, J.; Yao, X.; Yang, S.; Li, W.; Xu, L.; Zhao, L. LncRNA CRNDE attenuates chemoresistance in gastric cancer via SRSF6-regulated alternative splicing of PICALM. Mol. Cancer 2021, 20, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, H.; Sun, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, X.; Zhou, X. LncRNA SPRY4-IT was concerned with the poor prognosis and contributed to the progression of thyroid cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2018, 25, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, H.M.; Yang, H.; Wen, D.Y.; Luo, Y.H.; Liang, C.Y.; Pan, D.H.; Ma, W.; Chen, G.; He, Y.; Chen, J.Q. Overexpression of LncRNA HOTAIR is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Thyroid Carcinoma: A Study Based on TCGA and GEO Data. Horm. Metab. Res. 2017, 49, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fan, M.; Li, X.; Jiang, W.; Huang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Z. A long non-coding RNA, PTCSC3, as a tumor suppressor and a target of miRNAs in thyroid cancer cells. Exp. Ther. Med. 2013, 5, 1143–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mahmoudian-Sani, M.R.; Jalali, A.; Jamshidi, M.; Moridi, H.; Alghasi, A.; Shojaeian, A.; Mobini, G.R. Long Non-Coding RNAs in Thyroid Cancer: Implications for Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Oncol. Res. Treat. 2019, 42, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jing, W.; Li, X.; Peng, R.; Lv, S.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, Z.; Tu, J.; Ming, L. The diagnostic and prognostic significance of long noncoding RNAs expression in thyroid cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2018, 214, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. French, J.D.; Bible, K.; Spitzweg, C.; Haugen, B.R.; Ryder, M. Leveraging the immune system to treat advanced thyroid cancers. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017, 5, 469–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, X.; Peng, W.; Li, C.; Qin, R.; Zhong, Z.; Sun, C. Identification of an immune-related signature indicating the dedifferentiation of thyroid cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xie, Z.; Li, X.; He, Y.; Wu, S.; Wang, S.; Sun, J.; He, Y.; Lun, Y.; Zhang, J. Immune Cell Confrontation in the Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Microenvironment. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 570604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, B.H. The expression of tumor-associated macrophages in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 28, 178–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Cameselle-Garcia, S.; Abdulkader-Sande, S.; Sanchez-Ares, M.; Rodriguez-Carnero, G.; Garcia-Gomez, J.; Gude-Sampedro, F.; Abdulkader-Nallib, I.; Cameselle-Teijeiro, J.M. PD-L1 expression and immune cells in anaplastic carcinoma and poorly differentiated carcinoma of the human thyroid gland: A retrospective study. Oncol. Lett. 2021, 22, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tesselaar, M.H.; Smith, J.W.; Nagarajah, J.; Netea-Maier, R.T.; Plantinga, T.S. Pathological processes and therapeutic advances in radioiodide refractory thyroid cancer. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2017, 59, R141–R154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lei, Q.; Wang, D.; Sun, K.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y. Resistance Mechanisms of Anti-PD1/PDL1 Therapy in Solid Tumors. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gunda, V.; Gigliotti, B.; Ndishabandi, D.; Ashry, T.; McCarthy, M.; Zhou, Z.; Amin, S.; Freeman, G.J.; Alessandrini, A.; Parangi, S. Combinations of BRAF inhibitor and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody improve survival and tumour immunity in an immunocompetent model of orthotopic murine anaplastic thyroid cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2018, 119, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhao, S.; Ye, Z.; Stanton, R. Misuse of RPKM or TPM normalization when comparing across samples and sequencing protocols. RNA 2020, 26, 903–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Nishant, A.; Rehan, A.; Arman, A.B.; Adrian, A.; Harindra, A.; Sylvia, L.A.; Todd, A.J.; Miruna, B.; Saianand, B.; Stephen, B.B.; et al. Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell 2014, 159, 676–690. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dom, G.; Tarabichi, M.; Unger, K.; Thomas, G.; Oczko-Wojciechowska, M.; Bogdanova, T.; Jarzab, B.; Dumont, J.E.; Detours, V.; Maenhaut, C. A gene expression signature distinguishes normal tissues of sporadic and radiation-induced papillary thyroid carcinomas. Br. J. Cancer 2012, 107, 994–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Szklarczyk, D.; Morris, J.H.; Cook, H.; Kuhn, M.; Wyder, S.; Simonovic, M.; Santos, A.; Doncheva, N.T.; Roth, A.; Bork, P.; et al. The STRING database in 2017: Quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D362–D368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhou, Y.; Zhou, B.; Pache, L.; Chang, M.; Khodabakhshi, A.H.; Tanaseichuk, O.; Benner, C.; Chanda, S.K. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Newman, A.M.; Liu, C.L.; Green, M.R.; Gentles, A.J.; Feng, W.; Xu, Y.; Hoang, C.D.; Diehn, M.; Alizadeh, A.A. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Yi, M.; Nissley, D.V.; McCormick, F.; Stephens, R.M. ssGSEA score-based Ras dependency indexes derived from gene expression data reveal potential Ras addiction mechanisms with possible clinical implications. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Becht, E.; Giraldo, N.A.; Lacroix, L.; Buttard, B.; Elarouci, N.; Petitprez, F.; Selves, J.; Laurent-Puig, P.; Sautes-Fridman, C.; Fridman, W.H.; et al. Estimating the population abundance of tissue-infiltrating immune and stromal cell populations using gene expression. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Reinhold, W.C.; Sunshine, M.; Varma, S.; Doroshow, J.H.; Pommier, Y. Using CellMiner 1.6 for Systems Pharmacology and Genomic Analysis of the NCI-60. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 3841–3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yang, L.X.; Wu, J.; Guo, M.L.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, S.G. Suppression of long non-coding RNA TNRC6C-AS1 protects against thyroid carcinoma through DNA demethylation of STK4 via the Hippo signalling pathway. Cell Prolif. 2019, 52, e12564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bai, D.; Guo, C.; Wang, A.; Pang, G.; Gao, J.; Wang, C.; Zhao, D.; Yang, J.; Ren, J. LncRNA CASC15 promotes the proliferation of papillary thyroid carcinoma cells by regulating the miR-7151-5p/WNT7A axis. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2021, 225, 153561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aashiq, M.; Silverman, D.A.; Na’ara, S.; Takahashi, H.; Amit, M. Radioiodine-Refractory Thyroid Cancer: Molecular Basis of Redifferentiation Therapies, Management, and Novel Therapies. Cancers 2019, 11, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Oh, J.M.; Ahn, B.C. Molecular mechanisms of radioactive iodine refractoriness in differentiated thyroid cancer: Impaired sodium iodide symporter (NIS) expression owing to altered signaling pathway activity and intracellular localization of NIS. Theranostics 2021, 11, 6251–6277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. MacDonald, L.; Jenkins, J.; Purvis, G.; Lee, J.; Franco, A.T. The Thyroid Tumor Microenvironment: Potential Targets for Therapeutic Intervention and Prognostication. Horm. Cancer 2020, 11, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Naoum, G.E.; Morkos, M.; Kim, B.; Arafat, W. Novel targeted therapies and immunotherapy for advanced thyroid cancers. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Varricchi, G.; Loffredo, S.; Marone, G.; Modestino, L.; Fallahi, P.; Ferrari, S.M.; de Paulis, A.; Antonelli, A.; Galdiero, M.R. The Immune Landscape of Thyroid Cancer in the Context of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Elia, G.; Ferrari, S.M.; Galdiero, M.R.; Ragusa, F.; Paparo, S.R.; Ruffilli, I.; Varricchi, G.; Fallahi, P.; Antonelli, A. New insight in endocrine-related adverse events associated to immune checkpoint blockade. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 34, 101370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chowdhury, S.; Veyhl, J.; Jessa, F.; Polyakova, O.; Alenzi, A.; MacMillan, C.; Ralhan, R.; Walfish, P.G. Programmed death-ligand 1 overexpression is a prognostic marker for aggressive papillary thyroid cancer and its variants. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 32318–32328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Antonelli, A.; Ferrari, S.M.; Fallahi, P.; Frascerra, S.; Piaggi, S.; Gelmini, S.; Lupi, C.; Minuto, M.; Berti, P.; Benvenga, S.; et al. Dysregulation of secretion of CXC alpha-chemokine CXCL10 in papillary thyroid cancer: Modulation by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2009, 16, 1299–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Spartalis, E.; Athanasiadis, D.I.; Chrysikos, D.; Spartalis, M.; Boutzios, G.; Schizas, D.; Garmpis, N.; Damaskos, C.; Paschou, S.A.; Ioannidis, A.; et al. Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors and Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2019, 39, 1119–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Renko, K.; Schache, S.; Hoefig, C.S.; Welsink, T.; Schwiebert, C.; Braun, D.; Becker, N.P.; Kohrle, J.; Schomburg, L. An Improved Nonradioactive Screening Method Identifies Genistein and Xanthohumol as Potent Inhibitors of Iodothyronine Deiodinases. Thyroid 2015, 25, 962–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. LaCasce, A.S.; Bociek, R.G.; Sawas, A.; Caimi, P.; Agura, E.; Matous, J.; Ansell, S.M.; Crosswell, H.E.; Islas-Ohlmayer, M.; Behler, C.; et al. Brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine: A highly active first salvage regimen for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2018, 132, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Casella, C.; Ministrini, S.; Galani, A.; Mastriale, F.; Cappelli, C.; Portolani, N. The New TNM Staging System for Thyroid Cancer and the Risk of Disease Downstaging. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Liang, J. Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer and Redifferentiation Therapy. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 34, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ma, B.; Jiang, H.; Wen, D.; Hu, J.; Han, L.; Liu, W.; Xu, W.; Shi, X.; Wei, W.; Liao, T.; et al. Transcriptome Analyses Identify a Metabolic Gene Signature Indicative of Dedifferentiation of Papillary Thyroid Cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 3713–3725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Suh, H.Y.; Choi, H.; Paeng, J.C.; Cheon, G.J.; Chung, J.K.; Kang, K.W. Comprehensive gene expression analysis for exploring the association between glucose metabolism and differentiation of thyroid cancer. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Giuliani, C. The Flavonoid Quercetin Induces AP-1 Activation in FRTL-5 Thyroid Cells. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hou, P.; Bojdani, E.; Xing, M. Induction of thyroid gene expression and radioiodine uptake in thyroid cancer cells by targeting major signaling pathways. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Tomczak, K.; Czerwinska, P.; Wiznerowicz, M. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): An immeasurable source of knowledge. Contemp. Oncol. 2015, 19, A68–A77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study flow chart.
Figure 1. Study flow chart.
Cancers 14 01353 g001
Figure 2. The landscape of DR-lncRNAs regulators. (A) Expression of 16 differentiation related regulators in normal and tumor samples; (B) The relationship between differentiation-related regulators and DR-lncRNAs. (C) Differential expression of 5 DR-lncRNAs regulators. *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 2. The landscape of DR-lncRNAs regulators. (A) Expression of 16 differentiation related regulators in normal and tumor samples; (B) The relationship between differentiation-related regulators and DR-lncRNAs. (C) Differential expression of 5 DR-lncRNAs regulators. *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Cancers 14 01353 g002
Figure 3. Prognostic value of risk score. (A) Survival analysis of patients in the low-risk and high-risk groups. (B) Distributions of survival status and risk scores. (C) Heatmap distribution of risk scores and clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups. (D) The AUC of the risk score. AUC: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Figure 3. Prognostic value of risk score. (A) Survival analysis of patients in the low-risk and high-risk groups. (B) Distributions of survival status and risk scores. (C) Heatmap distribution of risk scores and clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups. (D) The AUC of the risk score. AUC: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Cancers 14 01353 g003
Figure 4. The correlation between risk signature and immune cell infiltration. (A) CIBERSORT. (B) ssGSEA. (C) MCP counter. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05.
Figure 4. The correlation between risk signature and immune cell infiltration. (A) CIBERSORT. (B) ssGSEA. (C) MCP counter. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05.
Cancers 14 01353 g004
Figure 5. Drug sensitivity analysis. (A) Correlations between IC50 for different drugs and differentiation-related regulators. (B) Compared the efficiency of the chosen drugs in relation to the risk score. * p < 0.05 and ns: no significance.
Figure 5. Drug sensitivity analysis. (A) Correlations between IC50 for different drugs and differentiation-related regulators. (B) Compared the efficiency of the chosen drugs in relation to the risk score. * p < 0.05 and ns: no significance.
Cancers 14 01353 g005
Figure 6. Construction and evaluation of an integrated nomogram. (A) Nomogram was developed based on DR-lncRNA-based risk scores and age. (B) Calibration plots were performed to evaluate the predictive performance of 3- and 5-year OS. (C) The AUC value of the nomogram. (D) DCA of the nomogram. OS: overall survival, AUC: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. DCA: decisions curve analysis.
Figure 6. Construction and evaluation of an integrated nomogram. (A) Nomogram was developed based on DR-lncRNA-based risk scores and age. (B) Calibration plots were performed to evaluate the predictive performance of 3- and 5-year OS. (C) The AUC value of the nomogram. (D) DCA of the nomogram. OS: overall survival, AUC: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. DCA: decisions curve analysis.
Cancers 14 01353 g006
Figure 7. Differential expression of prognostic related DR-lncRNAs. (A) Twenty paired PTC samples and adjacent normal tissues. (B) Nine thyroid cells and normal thyroid follicular epithelial cells. (C) PTC, ATC, and normal thyroid follicular epithelial cells. ATC: anaplastic thyroid cancer. PTC: papillary thyroid cancer. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 and no significance.
Figure 7. Differential expression of prognostic related DR-lncRNAs. (A) Twenty paired PTC samples and adjacent normal tissues. (B) Nine thyroid cells and normal thyroid follicular epithelial cells. (C) PTC, ATC, and normal thyroid follicular epithelial cells. ATC: anaplastic thyroid cancer. PTC: papillary thyroid cancer. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 and no significance.
Cancers 14 01353 g007
Figure 8. Depletion of DHP6-DT promoted proliferation and metastasis by activating the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. (A) IHH-4 and KTC-1 cells were transfected with different siDPH6-DT and scramble vector (control). (B) Knockdown of DPH6-DT enhanced cell viability by CCK-8 assay. (C) Deficiency of DPH6-DT dramatically increased cell proliferation by EdU assay. (D) Knockdown of DPH6-DT accelerated cell migration and invasion. (E) Western blot for the EMT and PI3K-AKT signal pathway related protein expression upon the knockdown of DPH6-DT. EMT: epithelial-mesenchymal transition. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05.
Figure 8. Depletion of DHP6-DT promoted proliferation and metastasis by activating the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. (A) IHH-4 and KTC-1 cells were transfected with different siDPH6-DT and scramble vector (control). (B) Knockdown of DPH6-DT enhanced cell viability by CCK-8 assay. (C) Deficiency of DPH6-DT dramatically increased cell proliferation by EdU assay. (D) Knockdown of DPH6-DT accelerated cell migration and invasion. (E) Western blot for the EMT and PI3K-AKT signal pathway related protein expression upon the knockdown of DPH6-DT. EMT: epithelial-mesenchymal transition. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05.
Cancers 14 01353 g008
Figure 9. Brief summary for the molecular mechanism of DR-lncRNAs. EMT: epithelial-mesenchymal transition. ATC: anaplastic thyroid cancer. PTC: papillary thyroid cancer. Biorender, available online: https://app.biorender.com (accessed on 2 November 2021).
Figure 9. Brief summary for the molecular mechanism of DR-lncRNAs. EMT: epithelial-mesenchymal transition. ATC: anaplastic thyroid cancer. PTC: papillary thyroid cancer. Biorender, available online: https://app.biorender.com (accessed on 2 November 2021).
Cancers 14 01353 g009
Table 1. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis the prognosis factors of PTC.
Table 1. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis the prognosis factors of PTC.
Variable Total (%)
N = 492
Univariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
HR (95%CI)pOR (95%CI)p
Age 47.01 ± 16.031.16 (1.10–1.22)<0.0011.15 (1.08–1.23)<0.001
Gender
Female 361 (77.37)
Male 131 (26.63)

Ref.
1.92 (0.69–5.29)


0.21
--
TNM Stage
I 276 (56.10)
II 52 (10.57)
III 109 (22.15)
IV 55 (11.18)

Ref.
5.67 (0.80–40.27)
10.25 (2.13–49.45)
16.47 (3.18–85.33)


0.083
0.004
<0.001

Ref.
0.77 (0.01–63.96)
0.62 (0.01–47.80)
0.10 (0–15.71)


0.906
0.827
0.375
T Stage
T1 135 (27.44)
T2 162 (32.93)
T3 172 (34.96)
T4 23 (4.67)

Ref.
1.10 (0.18–6.59)
1.69 (0.33–8.73)
11.52 (2.31–57.57)


0.920
0.531
0.003

Ref.
1.49 (0.02–100.44)
0.59 (0.01–41.61)
13.61 (0.11–1620.48)


0.852
0.809
0.284
N Stage
N0 271 (55.08)
N1 221 (44.92)

Ref.
1.14 (0.43–3.05)


0.078
--
M Stage
M0 483 (98.17)
M1 9 (1.83)

Ref.
5.39 (1.22–23.83)


0.026

Ref.
0.51 (0.05–4.68)


0.55
Multifocality
Multifocal 228 (46.34)
Unifocal 264 (53.66)

Ref.
3.91 (0.88–17.34)


0.073
--
Bilaterality
Bilateral 84 (17.07)
Unilateral 386 (78.46)
Isthmus 22 (4.47)

Ref.
0.95 (0.21–4.26)
1.05 (0.09–11.79)


0.942
0.967
--
Risk score2.99 (2.08–4.31)<0.0012.38 (1.45–4.25)<0.001
Abbreviations: CI: confidence intervals, HR: hazard ratio, OR: odds ratio.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, W.; Bai, N.; Li, X. Comprehensive Analysis of the Prognosis and Drug Sensitivity of Differentiation-Related lncRNAs in Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051353

AMA Style

Wang W, Bai N, Li X. Comprehensive Analysis of the Prognosis and Drug Sensitivity of Differentiation-Related lncRNAs in Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Cancers. 2022; 14(5):1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051353

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Wenlong, Ning Bai, and Xinying Li. 2022. "Comprehensive Analysis of the Prognosis and Drug Sensitivity of Differentiation-Related lncRNAs in Papillary Thyroid Cancer" Cancers 14, no. 5: 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051353

APA Style

Wang, W., Bai, N., & Li, X. (2022). Comprehensive Analysis of the Prognosis and Drug Sensitivity of Differentiation-Related lncRNAs in Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Cancers, 14(5), 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051353

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop