Next Article in Journal
Diagnostic Models Combining Clinical Information, Ultrasound and Biochemical Markers for Ovarian Cancer: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
The Right Treatment Strategy for the Right Patient: A Biomarker-Driven Approach to Neoadjuvant vs. Surgery-First Management of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Perspectives for 3D-Bioprinting in Modeling of Tumor Immune Evasion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Immune Evasion as the Main Challenge for Immunotherapy of Cancer

by
Radoslaw Zagozdzon
1,*,
Magdalena Winiarska
2 and
Malgorzata Firczuk
2
1
Department of Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Nowogrodzka 59 Street, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Nielubowicza 5 Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(15), 3622; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153622
Submission received: 12 July 2022 / Accepted: 14 July 2022 / Published: 26 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanisms of Tumor Immune Evasion)
Immune evasion is currently considered one of the most prominent hallmarks of cancer [1]. The immune system has evolved to perform two main functions: (1) elimination of the pathogenic danger and (2) tolerance toward self-tissues or symbiotic organisms. Additionally, the immune system can aid damaged tissue in the healing process. Under favorable conditions, malignant transformation is recognized as foreign and dangerous, and the immune system initiates the elimination attempt. This concept is referred to as immune surveillance [2]. If the immune surveillance succeeds, cancer can be eliminated before it becomes clinically detectable. However, in case of incomplete success, the selective pressure from the immune system initiates Darwinian-type microevolution [3]. In this process, called immunoediting, cancer evolves towards evading the destructive potential of the immune system, while taking advantage of the self-tolerance mechanisms or the pro-regenerative capabilities of the immune cells. There are multiple paths that cancer can follow during the escape from immune destruction. One of them occurs in so called “cold tumors”, when tumor microenvironment is devoid of effector cell infiltration capable of eliminating the cancer. An opposite situation is the “hot tumors”, when infiltrating tumor T cells are actively disarmed by a range of immunoregulatory mechanisms. Here, the main role in the process of immune evasion is attributed to suppressive subtypes of immune cells along with the effects elicited by metabolic and immune checkpoints. Quite often a mixture of evasion mechanisms occurs, synergizing towards the immune escape and progression of cancer. Understanding in detail the crosstalk between the tumor and immune system is one of the main challenges for oncological research in order to design new and more efficient immunotherapies [4]. It becomes obvious that successful anticancer treatment requires a holistic view on the subject of immune evasion.
This special issue is dedicated to the elucidation of a range of mechanisms responsible for tumor immune evasion, as well as potential ways of battling these mechanisms. Reviews and research papers gathered in the current special issue describe several crucial aspects of the immune escape. Specifically, reviews by Pastorczak et al. [5] and Swatler et al. [6] provide overviews on the immune evasion mechanisms in hematological malignancies—acute lymphoblastic and myeloid leukemias, respectively. In turn, the works by Retecki et al. [7] and Anichini et al. [8] summarize current knowledge on the immune landscape of breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer, respectively, as examples of solid tumors. Six of the papers focus on the role of specific cell types in tumor immune evasion. Among these, the research paper by Menzner et al. [9] reported a novel axis between hydrogen peroxide and low-density lipoproteins-mediated axis in immunosuppressive abilities of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. The review by Demkow [10] underlined the multifaceted crosstalk between cancer and neutrophil extracellular traps during tumor progression. Macrophages, as main players in tumor-promoting inflammation and the dialogue between the immune system and cancer, were the subject of a comprehensive review by Cendrowicz at al. [11]. Additionally, the most promising new strategies for targeting the cell surface molecules present on tumor-associated macrophages to improve antibody-based therapies were presented in the paper by Hussain at al. [12]. An attractive point of view was presented by Grzywa et al. [13] in a review describing the potential role of dysregulation of erythroid progenitor cells, among other immunosuppressive cell types, in the interactions between the hematopoietic/immune systems and developing cancer. The review by Domagala et al. [14] described the effects of tumor microenvironment-related metabolic factors on the anticancer effectiveness of natural killer cells. Finally, the review by Zhylko et al. [15] presented strategies for overcoming the immune escape mechanisms for the successful application of novel anticancer immunotherapies utilizing chimeric antigen receptor-bearing T cells. On the molecular level, a research article by Jancewicz et al. [16] and a review paper by Glorieux et al. [17] focus on highlighting specific associations between PD-L1-mediated immune checkpoint functions in cancer in correspondence to SWI/SNF complex deregulation and redox signaling, respectively. Molecular insights were also provided in the review by Tanaka and Siemann [18] regarding the role of Gas6/Axl-mediated axis in the tumor immune evasion mechanisms.
Altogether, the set of articles in the current special issue presents an extraordinary variety of events that may occur when developing cancer escapes immune surveillance and shapes the microenvironment to support tumor development and progression. It is becoming apparent that for the holistic understanding of these multilayer relations between cancer and the immune system, the generation of novel, more precise preclinical models is needed in addition to the existing diagnostic and research methodologies. Among others, the hope lies in combining recent advances of the 3D-bioprinting systems, as reviewed by Staros at al. in the current issue [19] and other authors [20,21,22], with single-cell- and multi-omic-based assays [23,24] along with the strong support from mathematical and computational oncology tools [25]. Such structures can more precisely recapitulate the specificities of the tumor microenvironment and provide vital information for generating new and successful anticancer immunotherapeutics.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Burnet, F.M. The concept of immunological surveillance. Prog. Exp. Tumor Res. 1970, 13, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shlyakhtina, Y.; Moran, K.L.; Portal, M.M. Genetic and Non-Genetic Mechanisms Underlying Cancer Evolution. Cancers 2021, 13, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gajewski, T.F.; Corrales, L.; Williams, J.; Horton, B.; Sivan, A.; Spranger, S. Cancer Immunotherapy Targets Based on Understanding the T Cell-Inflamed Versus Non-T Cell-Inflamed Tumor Microenvironment. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 1036, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pastorczak, A.; Domka, K.; Fidyt, K.; Poprzeczko, M.; Firczuk, M. Mechanisms of Immune Evasion in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cancers 2021, 13, 1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Swatler, J.; Turos-Korgul, L.; Kozlowska, E.; Piwocka, K. Immunosuppressive Cell Subsets and Factors in Myeloid Leukemias. Cancers 2021, 13, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Retecki, K.; Seweryn, M.; Graczyk-Jarzynka, A.; Bajor, M. The Immune Landscape of Breast Cancer: Strategies for Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance. Cancers 2021, 13, 6012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Anichini, A.; Perotti, V.E.; Sgambelluri, F.; Mortarini, R. Immune Escape Mechanisms in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Menzner, A.K.; Rottmar, T.; Voelkl, S.; Bosch, J.J.; Mougiakakos, D.; Mackensen, A.; Resheq, Y.J. Hydrogen-Peroxide Synthesis and LDL-Uptake Controls Immunosuppressive Properties in Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells. Cancers 2021, 13, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Demkow, U. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) in Cancer Invasion, Evasion and Metastasis. Cancers 2021, 13, 4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cendrowicz, E.; Sas, Z.; Bremer, E.; Rygiel, T.P. The Role of Macrophages in Cancer Development and Therapy. Cancers 2021, 13, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hussain, K.; Cragg, M.S.; Beers, S.A. Remodeling the Tumor Myeloid Landscape to Enhance Antitumor Antibody Immunotherapies. Cancers 2021, 13, 4904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Grzywa, T.M.; Justyniarska, M.; Nowis, D.; Golab, J. Tumor Immune Evasion Induced by Dysregulation of Erythroid Progenitor Cells Development. Cancers 2021, 13, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Domagala, J.; Lachota, M.; Klopotowska, M.; Graczyk-Jarzynka, A.; Domagala, A.; Zhylko, A.; Soroczynska, K.; Winiarska, M. The Tumor Microenvironment—A Metabolic Obstacle to NK Cells’ Activity. Cancers 2020, 12, 3542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhylko, A.; Winiarska, M.; Graczyk-Jarzynka, A. The Great War of Today: Modifications of CAR-T Cells to Effectively Combat Malignancies. Cancers 2020, 12, 2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jancewicz, I.; Szarkowska, J.; Konopinski, R.; Stachowiak, M.; Swiatek, M.; Blachnio, K.; Kubala, S.; Oksinska, P.; Cwiek, P.; Rusetska, N.; et al. PD-L1 Overexpression, SWI/SNF Complex Deregulation, and Profound Transcriptomic Changes Characterize Cancer-Dependent Exhaustion of Persistently Activated CD4(+) T Cells. Cancers 2021, 13, 4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Glorieux, C.; Xia, X.; Huang, P. The Role of Oncogenes and Redox Signaling in the Regulation of PD-L1 in Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 4426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tanaka, M.; Siemann, D.W. Gas6/Axl Signaling Pathway in the Tumor Immune Microenvironment. Cancers 2020, 12, 1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Staros, R.; Michalak, A.; Rusinek, K.; Mucha, K.; Pojda, Z.; Zagozdzon, R. Perspectives for 3D-Bioprinting in Modeling of Tumor Immune Evasion. Cancers 2022, 14, 3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Heinrich, M.A.; Bansal, R.; Lammers, T.; Zhang, Y.S.; Michel Schiffelers, R.; Prakash, J. 3D-Bioprinted Mini-Brain: A Glioblastoma Model to Study Cellular Interactions and Therapeutics. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1806590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Datta, P.; Dey, M.; Ataie, Z.; Unutmaz, D.; Ozbolat, I.T. 3D bioprinting for reconstituting the cancer microenvironment. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2020, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bojin, F.; Robu, A.; Bejenariu, M.I.; Ordodi, V.; Olteanu, E.; Cean, A.; Popescu, R.; Neagu, M.; Gavriliuc, O.; Neagu, A.; et al. 3D Bioprinting of Model Tissues That Mimic the Tumor Microenvironment. Micromachines 2021, 12, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zeng, D.; Ye, Z.; Shen, R.; Yu, G.; Wu, J.; Xiong, Y.; Zhou, R.; Qiu, W.; Huang, N.; Sun, L.; et al. IOBR: Multi-Omics Immuno-Oncology Biological Research to Decode Tumor Microenvironment and Signatures. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 687975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, J.; Qu, S.; Zhang, T.; Gao, Y.; Shi, H.; Song, K.; Chen, W.; Yin, W. Applications of Single-Cell Omics in Tumor Immunology. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 697412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, P.J.; Roose, J.P.; Jablons, D.M.; Kratz, J.R. Bioinformatic Approaches to Validation and Functional Analysis of 3D Lung Cancer Models. Cancers 2021, 13, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zagozdzon, R.; Winiarska, M.; Firczuk, M. Immune Evasion as the Main Challenge for Immunotherapy of Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 3622. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153622

AMA Style

Zagozdzon R, Winiarska M, Firczuk M. Immune Evasion as the Main Challenge for Immunotherapy of Cancer. Cancers. 2022; 14(15):3622. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153622

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zagozdzon, Radoslaw, Magdalena Winiarska, and Malgorzata Firczuk. 2022. "Immune Evasion as the Main Challenge for Immunotherapy of Cancer" Cancers 14, no. 15: 3622. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153622

APA Style

Zagozdzon, R., Winiarska, M., & Firczuk, M. (2022). Immune Evasion as the Main Challenge for Immunotherapy of Cancer. Cancers, 14(15), 3622. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153622

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop