Circulating Low Density Neutrophils Are Associated with Resistance to First Line Anti-PD1/PDL1 Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Arasanz, Hugo; Bocanegra, Ana Isabel; Morilla, Idoia; Fernández-Irigoyen, Joaquín; Martínez-Aguillo, Maite; Teijeira, Lucía; Garnica, Maider; Blanco, Ester; Chocarro, Luisa; Ausin, Karina; Zuazo, Miren; Fernández-Hinojal, Gonzalo; Echaide, Miriam; Fernández-Rubio, Leticia; Piñeiro-Hermida, Sergio; Ramos, Pablo; Mezquita, Laura; Escors, David; Vera, Ruth; Kochan, Grazyna

doi:10.3390/cancers14163846

Open AccessArticle

Circulating Low Density Neutrophils Are Associated with Resistance to First Line Anti-PD1/PDL1 Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

by

Hugo Arasanz

^1,2,*

,

Ana Isabel Bocanegra

¹

,

Idoia Morilla

^2,3,

Joaquín Fernández-Irigoyen

⁴

,

Maite Martínez-Aguillo

^2,3,

Lucía Teijeira

^2,3,

Maider Garnica

¹

,

Ester Blanco

^1,5

,

Luisa Chocarro

¹

,

Karina Ausin

⁴

,

Miren Zuazo

¹,

Gonzalo Fernández-Hinojal

⁶

,

Miriam Echaide

¹,

Leticia Fernández-Rubio

¹,

Sergio Piñeiro-Hermida

¹,

Pablo Ramos

¹

,

Laura Mezquita

^7,8,

David Escors

^1,*,†,

Ruth Vera

^2,3,†

and

Grazyna Kochan

^1,†

¹

Oncoimmunology Group, Navarrabiomed, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea St., 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain

²

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain

³

Oncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain

⁴

Clinical Neuroproteomics Unit, Proteomics Platform, Proteored-ISCIII, Navarrabiomed, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain

⁵

Gene Therapy and Regulation of Gene Expression, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain

⁶

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain

⁷

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, 08036 Barcelona, Spain

⁸

Medical Oncology Department, Laboratory of Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, 08036 Barcelona, Spain

^*

Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

^†

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Cancers 2022, 14(16), 3846; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163846

Submission received: 25 June 2022 / Revised: 5 August 2022 / Accepted: 7 August 2022 / Published: 9 August 2022

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment Modalities for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer—A Clinical Survey)

Download

Browse Figures

Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Immunotherapy has been positioned as frontline therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), alone when PD-L1 tumor expression is high, or combined with chemotherapy otherwise. However, 50% of the patients do not respond to the treatment and the mechanisms of resistance are not well defined. Moreover, it is not clear whether chemo-immunotherapy could be advantageous in high PD-L1 tumor expression. We have found that baseline circulating low-density neutrophils (LDN) identify a subset of patients intrinsically refractory to immunotherapy. Interestingly, responses can be achieved with CT+IT, detecting a progressive depletion of LDN. Besides the potential role as predictive biomarker we observed that resistance was mediated by soluble molecules related with the HGF/c-MET pathway. Our findings establish circulating myeloid cells as one of the main mediators of resistance to immunotherapy in NSCLC, and give a rationale for potential drug combinations that might improve the outcomes.

Abstract

Single-agent immunotherapy has been widely accepted as frontline treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high tumor PD-L1 expression, but most patients do not respond and the mechanisms of resistance are not well known. Several works have highlighted the immunosuppressive activities of myeloid subpopulations, including low-density neutrophils (LDNs), although the context in which these cells play their role is not well defined. We prospectively monitored LDNs in peripheral blood from patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as frontline therapy, in a cohort of patients treated with anti-PD1 immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (CT+IT), and correlated values with outcomes. We explored the underlying mechanisms through ex vivo experiments. Elevated baseline LDNs predict primary resistance to ICI monotherapy in patients with NSCLC, and are not associated with response to CT+IT. Circulating LDNs mediate resistance in NSCLC receiving ICI as frontline therapy through humoral immunosuppression. A depletion of this population with CT+IT might overcome resistance, suggesting that patients with high PD-L1 tumor expression and high baseline LDNs might benefit from this combination. The activation of the HGF/c-MET pathway in patients with elevated LDNs revealed by quantitative proteomics supports potential drug combinations targeting this pathway.

Keywords:

lung cancer; NSCLC; immunotherapy; neutrophils; LDN; biomarkers; PD-1; immune checkpoint inhibitors

1. Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved the outcomes of patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies have become the standard frontline treatment, as a single agent when PD-L1 tumor expression is high or combined with chemotherapy otherwise [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Unfortunately, the majority of the patients do not respond to treatment, no accurate predictive biomarkers able to identify those who will obtain a greater benefit have been discovered yet, and the mechanisms of resistance are not well understood [9,10]. Moreover, some patients with high PD-L1 expression who do not respond to single-agent ICI might benefit from chemoimmunotherapy combination.

Over recent years, the relevance of neutrophils in the immune response against cancer has been highlighted, although the understanding of their role is far from complete. Pro-tumor and anti-tumor activity have been described depending on the tissue and context [11,12]. A population of circulating neutrophils with immunosuppressive properties known as low-density neutrophils (LDNs) has been detected in cancer patients [13,14,15], although its association with response to ICI has not yet been defined.

LDNs are an heterogeneous population comprising both mature and immature neutrophils. Whether it is a distinct lineage of neutrophils or the consequence of a premature release from bone marrow is still a matter of debate, and even the characteristics and function of LDNs might differ between cancer and other chronic inflammatory diseases, as even proinflammatory activities have been described in the latter [16]. However, a work by Sagiv JY et al. suggested a distinct origin and demonstrated that high density neutrophils (HDN) can switch to LDN through a TGF-β-dependent mechanism [13].

Our group previously demonstrated the association between circulating immune cells, particularly CD4 T cells, and the response to ICI in patients with NSCLC that have progressed to platinum-based chemotherapy [17]. Surprisingly, preliminary data from that project suggested that, in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving ICI as frontline treatment, circulating CD4 T cells did not have predictive value, while LDNs might be associated with primary resistance [18].

We have used flow cytometry to prospectively monitor LDNs levels in fresh blood samples from a cohort of patients with untreated advanced NSCLC receiving ICI monotherapy as frontline treatment, and evaluated the association with response and disease control. These findings were compared with a cohort of patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy combination. Lastly, we explored ex vivo the mechanisms of resistance using co-cultures, and compared the plasma of the different cohorts of patients using quantitative proteomics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Patient Enrolment

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Navarre. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and all experiments were performed according to the principles stablished in the Declaration of Helsinki and the Department of Health and Human Services Belmont Report. Samples were collected by the Blood and Tissue Bank of Navarre, Health Department of Navarre, Spain. Thirty-one patients diagnosed with NSCLC and PD-L1 tumor expression ≥50% were recruited at the University Hospital of Navarre. All received anti-PD1 immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) as frontline therapy according to current indications. Twenty patients diagnosed of NSCLC and PD-L1 0–49% were recruited at University Hospital of Navarre. They were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy combined with anti-PD1 immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) according to current indications. Exclusion criteria were mixed histologies, previous treatment for advanced disease or progression during neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic treatment. Data from a cohort of healthy donors and of patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 after progression to first-line chemotherapy were also evaluated [17].

Ten ml of peripheral blood samples were obtained before the first cycle of immunotherapy, and after the first radiological control. PBMCs were isolated using Ficoll gradient as described elsewhere [17] and immune cell subpopulations were analyzed by flow cytometry. After centrifugation, LDN grouped at the interface between plasma and Ficoll as described [14], and were further analyzed along with PBMCs. Participation of each patient in the study concluded when a radiological test confirmed response or progression, or if the patient withdrew consent or died. Tumor responses were evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 [19] and Immune-Related Response Criteria [20]. Progressive disease was confirmed by at least one sequential tumor assessment, except in the case of clear clinical deterioration.

2.2. Flow Cytometry

Surface flow cytometry analyses were performed as described elsewhere [21]. Blood samples (10 mL) were obtained from each patient, and immediately processed. PBMCs were isolated by FICOL gradients. PBMCs were washed and cells were stained with the indicated antibodies in a final volume of 50 μL for 10 min in ice. The following fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies were used at 1:50 dilutions unless otherwise stated: CD3-APC (ref 130-113-135, Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch-Gladbach, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany), CD4-APC-Cy7 (ref 130-113-251, Miltenyi Biotech), CD4-FITC (ref 130-114-531, Miltenyi Biotech), CD8-FITC (ref 35-0088-T500, Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), CD11b-PerCP-Cy5 (1:250) (ref 65-0112-U100, Tonbo Biosciences), CD14-PB (1:20) (ref 75-0149-T100, Tonbo Biosciences), CD27-PE (1:20) (ref 50-0279-T100, Tonbo Biosciences), CD28-PE-Cy7 (ref 302926, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD28-PerPC-Cy5 (1:20) (ref 302921, BioLegend), CD45RA-PB (ref 130-113-922, Miltenyi Biotech), CD56-PE-Cy7 (ref 130-113-870, Miltenyi Biotech), CD57-PB (ref 130-123-866, Miltenyi Biotech), CD62L-APC (1:20) (ref 304810, BioLegend), CD62L-PerCP-Cy5 (ref 304823, BioLegend), CD66b-APC-Cy7 (ref 130-120-146, Miltenyi Biotech), CD95-FITC (ref 130-124-261, Miltenyi Biotech), CD116-APC (ref 130-100-986, Miltenyi Biotech), CD119-PE (ref 130-125-874, Miltenyi Biotech), KLRG1-APC-Cy7 (ref 130-120-563, Miltenyi Biotech), LAG3-PE (ref 369306, BioLegend) and PD1-PE-Cy7 (ref 130-120-391, Miltenyi Biotech). Gating strategy is presented in supplementary materials (Figure S1).

2.3. Cell Culture

Human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells were a kind gift of Prof Rubén Pío, authenticated by his group, and were grown in standard conditions. They were confirmed to be mycoplasma-free by PCR. These cells were modified with a lentivector encoding a single-chain version of a membrane-bound anti-OKT3 antibody [22]. The lentivector expressed the single-chain antibody construct under the control of the SFFV promoter and puromycin resistance from the human ubiquitin promoter in a pDUAL lentivector construct [23]. The single-chain antibody construct contained the variable light and heavy OKT3 immunoglobulin sequences separated by a G-S linker fused to a human IgG1 constant region sequence followed by the PD-L1 transmembrane domain.

Cell growth and cytotoxicity were monitored using xCELLigence real-time cell analysis (RTCA, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Ten thousand A549-OKT3 cells resuspended in RPMI supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) were seeded in each well, adding plasma from patients or healthy donors at a 1:3 concentration when required by the experiment. After a 24-h incubation, 5000 T lymphocytes obtained from patients with NSCLC or healthy donors and stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 were added. Each group had at least three repetitions, and each experiment was performed at least twice to confirm the results.

2.4. Data Collection and Statistics

Immune cell subpopulations were quantified using FlowJo (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The percentage of LDNs were quantified prior to therapy (baseline) and after the first radiological control. Data were recorded by H.A., A.I.B., M.Z. and M.G., and separately analyzed by H.A. and M.G.

Treatments were administered to the patients according to current indications. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the starting date of therapy to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was censored on the date of the last patient consultation when no signs of progressive disease were evident. PFS was represented by Kaplan-Meier Plots and log-rank tests were used to compare cohorts. Derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) score were calculated as described [24]. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis were performed with baseline LDNs numbers, NLR, dNLR and neutrophils and disease control at 6 months yes/no as a binary output. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the start date of therapy to the date of death from any cause. OS was evaluated in the same way as PFS.

Statistical tests were performed with GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and SPSS statistical packages (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Percentages of LDNs were not normally distributed, so the comparisons between groups were made using Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

2.5. Proteomics

Plasma from the patients with NSCLC recruited for this study was purified before the administration of the first cycle of treatment, and frozen at −80 °C for further analysis. Plasma samples from patients with NSCLC that had progressed to platinum-based chemotherapy were recovered from a previous project [17]. The Multiple Affinity Removal Spin Cartridge System (Agilent Technologies, Miami, FL, USA) was used to remove the most abundant proteins according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 6 μL of human plasma was diluted 16-fold with Buffer A and filtered through a 0.22-μm spin filter (1 min, 14,000× g). The non-bound protein fraction was collected and the column was washed twice with Buffer A and centrifuged (2.5 min, 100× g). Protein concentration was measured using Bradford assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). MS/MS Library Generation and Quantitative Analysis were performed as previously described [25], and included 5 healthy donors, 4 untreated patients with NSCLC and high LDN levels, 5 untreated patients with non-squamous NSCLC and low LDN levels, 5 untreated patients with squamous NSCLC and low LDN levels and 5 patients with NSCLC that had progressed to platinum-based chemotherapy and high LDN levels. Briefly, 20 μg per sample were be used and the quantitative data obtained was analyzed using Perseus software (Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Munich, Germany) [26] for statistical analysis and data visualization.

2.6. Bioinformatics

Multiparametric flow cytometry data were represented in 2 dimensions using T-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (tSNE) algorithms [27]. Networks obtained from comparative proteomics of plasma from different cohorts were identified and represented using STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes) software (http://stringdb.org/, accessed on several occasions from September 2021 to March 2022) [28].

3. Results

3.1. Study Population

Thirty-one patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC who received pembrolizumab as frontline therapy were recruited. All had PD-L1 tumor expression ≥ 50%. Baseline characteristics are depicted in Table 1. Overall response rate (ORR) was 42.9%, and disease control rate (DCR) was 64.3%. Median PFS and OS were 5.7 and 33.0 months, respectively. Fast progressive disease (fast-PD)/early death rate, defined as death at 12 weeks after starting, was 25.8%.

In another study cohort, 21 patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC who received chemotherapy-immunotherapy combination (CT+IT) including pembrolizumab as first-line treatment were recruited. Baseline characteristics are depicted in Table 2. Overall, 61.9% had PD-L1 expression ≤ 1%, 14.3% had PD-L1 expression 1–4% and 23.8% had PD-L1 expression 5–49%. ORR was 47.4%, and DCR was 52.6%. Median PFS was 3.6 months, while median OS was not reached. The rate of fast-PD/early death was 9.5%.

3.2. Baseline Low-Density Neutrophils (LDNs) and Response to ICI Monotherapy as Frontline Treatment in NSCLC

In the cohort of 31 patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC who received pembrolizumab as frontline therapy, the overall immune cell composition in peripheral blood was characterized by high-dimensional flow cytometry and tSNE analyses in 3 consecutive patients with disease control longer than 6 months. These results were compared to those of 3 consecutive progressors. To avoid the confounding effect of chemotherapy, initially only patients receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy were evaluated.

Previous work by our group showed that relative percentages of highly differentiated CD4 T cells (CD4 THD) in peripheral blood were a good predictive biomarker of response to second-line ICI monotherapies [17]. However, no correlation was observed in patients treated with frontline ICI therapy. Interestingly, a strong enrichment of low-density neutrophils (LDNs), a subpopulation with immunosuppressive properties identified as CD11b+ CD116+ CD66b+ CD3− CD14−, was found in progressors, while this population was apparently absent in responders (Figure 1A).

In the overall cohort of patients treated with ICI monotherapy, higher levels of LDNs were detected in progressors compared to responders or healthy donors (mean 25.2%, 2.7% and 0.7%, respectively; p < 0.0001). No differences were found according to age or tumor burden (Supplementary Figure S2). To evaluate the value of baseline LDNs as a biomarker of response, ROC analyses were performed and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.908 (p < 0.001) was calculated. ROC analyses established a LDN threshold of 7.09%, which identified patients who showed disease control of less than 6 months with a sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 93.3% (Figure 1B). Patients with LDNs above this threshold presented an ORR of 0%, lower median progression free survival (mPFS) (5.6 weeks vs. non-reached, p < 0.001) and lower median OS (mOS) (6.1 weeks vs. non reached, p = 0.004) (Figure 1C). Furthermore, the incidence of fast-PD/early death was significantly higher in patients with NSCLC and high baseline LDNs (66.7% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.001) (data not shown).

3.3. High LDN Levels and Resistance to First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with NSCLC

Twenty-one patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy combination (CT+IT) containing pembrolizumab as first-line treatment were recruited. In contrast to the results from first-line ICI monotherapy, baseline proportions of circulating LDNs did not predict response to CT+IT (AUC 0.350, p = 0.257), and levels did not differ between responders and non-responders (mean 31.2% and 16.8%, p = 0.14), suggesting a predictive and not prognostic value of LDNs (Figure 2A). Moreover, some patients with high baseline LDN levels (n = 9) responded to treatment and we observed in all of them a brisk decline in LDNs between the first and the second cycle. Significant proportions of LDNs were no longer observed at the time of the first radiological follow-up. This suggests that these cells play an active role in ICI resistance (Figure 2B).

To confirm that the predictive value of LDNs was specific to patients treated with ICI monotherapy as first-line therapy, we retrospectively studied the flow cytometry staining from a previous well-characterized cohort of patients with NSCLC treated with ICI monotherapy after progression to platinum-based chemotherapy [17]. No significant differences in LDNs were found between first-line and pretreated NSCLC (median 8.1% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.15) (data not shown). Again, the mean proportion of LDNs was not higher in patients who progressed to treatment compared with responders (9.5% vs. 19.1%, p = 0.13) (data not shown).

Previous works have demonstrated the predictive value of baseline neutrophils in peripheral blood tests from patients with NSCLC treated with ICI [24,29,30]. To identify any relationship between neutrophils and LDNs, we studied the correlation between neutrophils from ordinary blood samples and LDNs quantified by flow cytometry. A statistically significant association was found by linear regression (p = 0.047), although the strength of the association was low. We observed that all patients with high levels of neutrophils presented a high proportion of LDNs (Figure 2C). However, 54% of patients with LDNs above the 7.08% threshold had no neutrophilia, suggesting that the expansion of LDN is independent of peripheral neutrophils.

The predictive value of peripheral neutrophils, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived NLR (dNLR) was then studied. These variables were associated with progression to ICI monotherapy, although with lower sensitivity and specificity than LDNs (AUC 0.638, p = 0.11; AUC 0.750, p = 0.02; AUC 0.634, p = 0.21) (Figure 2D). Interestingly, NLR and dNLR were also associated with resistance to CT+IT (Figure 2E), and with OS in both the ICI monotherapy and the CT+IT cohort (not shown), indicating prognostic and not predictive value.

3.4. Soluble Factors in Plasma from Patients with High LDN Levels Impair Antitumor Immune Response Ex Vivo

To evaluate ex vivo T cell effector functions from the different cohorts of patients, we performed co-cultures of T cells with A549-SC3 cells, a human lung cancer cell line engineered by us to express membrane-bound anti-CD3 single-chain antibody to ensure tumor cell recognition by lymphocytes independently of antigen-specificity [17]. T cells from healthy donors were used as controls. T cells from patients with NSCLC regardless of their LDN status showed comparable cytotoxic activities to T cells from healthy donors (Figure 3A). These results showed that T cells from these patients are not dysfunctional per se.

It had been previously demonstrated that soluble factors might mediate immune suppression caused by LDNs [31]. To find out if this was the case, co-cultures of A549-SC3 cells with T cells isolated from healthy donors were carried out in the presence or absence of plasma from healthy donors, from patients with NSCLC and normal LDNs proportions, and from patients with NSCLC and elevated LDNs. Interestingly, only plasma from patients with elevated LDNs levels abrogated T cell cytotoxicity over A549-SC3 cells (Figure 3B). Furthermore, in the absence of T cells, the plasma of these patients promoted cancer cell growth (Figure 3C).

Finally, to identify potential immunosuppressive candidates in plasma from patients with NSCLC and elevated LDNs, we performed quantitative proteomics in plasma. To this end, plasma from healthy donors, from untreated NSCLC patients with normal LDN proportions, from untreated patients with NSCLC and elevated LDNs, and from patients with NSCLC and elevated LDNs treated with ICI monotherapy after progression to platinum-based chemotherapy were used.

Interestingly, untreated patients with NSCLC and elevated LDNs exhibited a distinct proteome. We found an enrichment in proteins related with neutrophil polarization and regulation of inflammation, suggesting a potential role for LDNs in therapeutic resistance. Among these, hepatocyte-growth factor (HGF) activator (HGFAC), a serin-protease that activates HGF, was significantly elevated (Figure 3D). HGF is an activator of the MET pathway, which has been associated with peripheral expansion of neutrophils [32], as well as with immunosuppressive activity of these cells and lack of tumor T lymphocyte infiltration [31]. We quantified plasmatic HGF by ELISA and found a trend towards higher levels in patients with NSCLC compared with controls (median 550.2 and 346.3 pg/mL, p = 0.08). However, no differences were observed between patients with or without elevated LDNs (mean 915.4 and 799.4 pg/mL, p = 0.7) (Figure S3).

4. Discussion

The precise mechanisms underlying the anticancer immune response unleashed by immunotherapy are still not well characterized. Even though several resistance mechanisms have been described, their impact on the efficacy of the treatment in the different cancer subtypes is yet to be defined. Several papers exploring predictive biomarkers of response to ICI in NSCLC have been published up to date. However, the actual role that these biomarkers might play in the immune response has not been sufficiently detailed, probably due to the recruitment of heterogeneous cohorts of patients receiving different treatments in dissimilar clinical settings.

In agreement with other studies [33,34,35], we found a strong association between high baseline levels of circulating LDNs and resistance to ICI in untreated patients. LDN levels are higher in patients with advanced cancer compared with early-stage cancer patients or healthy controls [33,34]. Interestingly, LDNs were not associated with resistance to CT+IT, which indicates not only that circulating LDNs are a predictive biomarker of resistance to single-agent ICI as frontline therapy, but also suggests that chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy might deplete this cell population and allow an antitumor response. Neutrophil depletion, as well as IL-6 blockade, were associated with enhanced anti-PD1 immunotherapy efficacy in 2 lung cancer murine models [36,37]. Accordingly, we found that all patients with elevated LDNs who responded to CT+IT showed a brisk decline of LDNs after the first cycle, and this population was almost absent at the first radiological follow-up.

High baseline levels of neutrophils in routine blood tests, often represented as NLR or dNLR, has been stablished as an adverse biomarker, both prognostic and predictive of response to ICI [24]. We observed a low strength association between neutrophils in blood tests and LDN measured by flow cytometry, suggesting that some patients present a generalized expansion of myeloid subsets while some tumors can induce a specific expansion of LDNs. A recent paper reported higher rates of fast-PD/early death in patients with NSCLC and high dNLR before starting ICI monotherapy [38]. We found a numerically higher proportion of fast-PD/early death in the ICI monotherapy cohort than in the CT+IT cohort, and an association between fast-PD/early death and high LDNs in the ICI monotherapy cohort but not in the CT+IT cohort. This suggests that CT+IT treatment could prevent fast-PD/early death in patients with NSCLC and high baseline LDNs receiving ICI monotherapy.

A translational study found that high blood neutrophil counts in melanoma patients refractory to immunotherapy were associated with high serum HGF levels. The authors demonstrated in a murine model that the inhibition of the HGF/c-MET axis impaired the recruitment of immunosuppressive neutrophils into tumors, thus allowing T cell tumor infiltration and enhancing the effect of immunotherapy [31]. Using ex vivo co-cultures we observed that plasma from patients with NSCLC and elevated LDN levels impaired the cytotoxic activities of T cells and promoted tumor cell proliferation. We used quantitative proteomics to compare the plasma of patients with elevated LDNs, and found in this subset of patients a specific upregulation of proteins associated with the immunosuppressive role of LDNs, the HGF/c-MET pathway being a potential route involved. Proteomics studies from tissue samples would have probably provided relevant additional data, but unfortunately in most of the cases these samples were not available as they were used for routine diagnostic test required for clinical practice. We did not find higher HGF levels in plasma from patients with high LDNs, which might reflect that the activation of the HGF/c-MET pathway depends on the overexpression of HGFAC rather than on increased production of HGF.

Our results show a specific association between LDNs and resistance to ICI monotherapy as frontline treatment in NSCLC. Patients with high baseline LDN levels, regardless of high PD-L1 tumor expression, might benefit from CT+IT. Even though LDNs appear to have a major role in the resistance to ICI monotherapy in NSCLC, other factors such as tumor gene alterations [39,40], additional infiltrating [41] or circulating immune cells [42], tumor microenvironment elements [43], as well as host related factors including intestinal microbiota [44], could be influencing the results. The spontaneous plasticity of LDNs might as well be a confounding factor, as the levels of these cells could significantly change over time and impact the efficacy of ICI [13]. Moreover, some of the previously mentioned factors also have a role in neutrophil differentiation and plasticity, and might indirectly affect the outcomes through mechanisms yet unexplored [45,46,47]. Due to the exploratory nature of the study, these findings will be validated in an independent cohort that is currently under recruitment. The potential benefit of ICI combining with HGF/c-MET pathway inhibitors could be explored in further studies.

5. Conclusions

Baseline LDNs identify a subset of patients with NSCLC intrinsically refractory to ICI monotherapy as frontline treatment. The combination of chemotherapy with ICI causes a depletion of LDNs, thus eliciting the antitumor immune response, and preventing fast-PD/early death. LDNs mediate resistance to ICI through humoral mechanisms, mainly via the HGF/c-MET pathway, suggesting a potential synergy between ICI and c-MET targeting drugs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers14163846/s1, Figure S1: Gating strategy for the identification of LDN; Figure S2: A: LDN levels stratified by patient’s age. B: LDN levels stratified by the number of organs affected. C: LDN levels stratified by the presence of liver metastasis; Figure S3: A: Plasmatic HGF concentration in healthy donors compared with patients with NSCLC. B: Plasmatic HGF concentration in patients with NSCLC and normal LDNs compared with high LDNs; File S1: Proteomic Analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.A., D.E. and G.K.; methodology, H.A., D.E. and G.K.; software, J.F.-I., K.A. and D.E.; validation, L.M., D.E., R.V. and G.K.; formal analysis, H.A., A.I.B., D.E., R.V. and G.K.; investigation, H.A., A.I.B., I.M., M.M.-A., L.T., M.G., E.B., L.C., M.Z., G.F.-H., M.E., L.F.-R., S.P.-H. and P.R.; resources, D.E., R.V. and G.K.; data curation, H.A., A.I.B., L.M., J.F.-I., K.A., M.Z., D.E., R.V. and G.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.A.; writing—review and editing, H.A., A.I.B., D.E., R.V. and G.K.; visualization, H.A., D.E. and G.K..; supervision, D.E., R.V. and G.K.; project administration, D.E. and G.K.; funding acquisition, H.A., D.E., R.V. and G.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are supported and funded by the Spanish Association against Cancer (AECC, PROYE16001ESCO), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII-FEDER, FIS. PI17/02119), and a Biomedicine Project grant from the Department of Health of the Government of Navarre (BMED 050-2019). H.A. is supported by the Clínico Junior 2019 scholarship from the AECC (CLJUN19010ARAS). D.E. is funded by a Miguel Servet Fellowship (ISC III, CP12/03114, Spain). Support for the writing of the article was provided by PUBLIbeCA SEOM 2020, with financial support from the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Navarre. All experiments were performed according to the principles stablished in the Declaration of Helsinki and the Department of Health and Human Services Belmont Report.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the patients and families who generously agreed to take part in this study. We also thank the nursing staff of the Medical Oncology Day Care at University Hospital of Navarre for their willful collaboration, and the Blood and Tissue Bank of Navarre, Health Department of Navarre, Spain. We are thankful of the support provided by PUBLIbeCA SEOM 2020 from the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) for the writing of the article.

Conflicts of Interest

H.A. has received honoraria for advisory roles from Astra Zeneca, and for clinical trial coordination from Ferrer Farma. L.M. reports research grant/funding (self) from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, Stilla, and Inivata; serving in advisory/consultancy for Roche and Takeda; receiving honoraria (self) from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, and Roche; receiving travel/accommodation/expenses from Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, and AstraZeneca; and having non-remunerated activities from AstraZeneca. M.M. has received honoraria for advisory roles from Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim. R.V. has received honoraria for advisory roles and for speaking from Amgen, Bayer, Astra Zeneca, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, MSD, Lilly, Servier; for consultant roles from Novartis. The other authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

References

Gadgeel, S.; Rodríguez-Abreu, D.; Speranza, G.; Esteban, E.; Felip, E.; Dómine, M.; Hui, R.; Hochmair, M.J.; Clingan, P.; Powell, S.F.; et al. Updated Analysis From KEYNOTE-189: Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum for Previously Untreated Metastatic Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 1505–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Herbst, R.S.; Giaccone, G.; de Marinis, F.; Reinmuth, N.; Vergnenegre, A.; Barrios, C.H.; Morise, M.; Felip, E.; Andric, Z.; Geater, S.; et al. Atezolizumab for First-Line Treatment of PD-L1–Selected Patients with NSCLC. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1328–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Paz-Ares, L.; Luft, A.; Vicente, D.; Tafreshi, A.; Gümüş, M.; Mazières, J.; Hermes, B.; Çay Şenler, F.; Csőszi, T.; Fülöp, A.; et al. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 2040–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Paz-Ares, L.; Ciuleanu, T.-E.; Cobo, M.; Schenker, M.; Zurawski, B.; Menezes, J.; Richardet, E.; Bennouna, J.; Felip, E.; Juan-Vidal, O.; et al. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with two cycles of chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 9LA): An international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021, 22, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Reck, M.; Rodríguez–Abreu, D.; Robinson, A.G.; Hui, R.; Csőszi, T.; Fülöp, A.; Gottfried, M.; Peled, N.; Tafreshi, A.; Cuffe, S.; et al. Updated Analysis of KEYNOTE-024: Pembrolizumab Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score of 50% or Greater. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sezer, A.; Kilickap, S.; Gümüş, M.; Bondarenko, I.; Özgüroğlu, M.; Gogishvili, M.; Turk, H.M.; Cicin, I.; Bentsion, D.; Gladkov, O.; et al. Cemiplimab monotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 of at least 50%: A multicentre, open-label, global, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2021, 397, 592–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Socinski, M.A.; Nishio, M.; Jotte, R.M.; Cappuzzo, F.; Orlandi, F.; Stroyakovskiy, D.; Nogami, N.; Rodríguez-Abreu, D.; Moro-Sibilot, D.; Thomas, C.A.; et al. IMpower150 Final Overall Survival Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in First-Line Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2021, 16, 1909–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
West, H.; McCleod, M.; Hussein, M.; Morabito, A.; Rittmeyer, A.; Conter, H.J.; Kopp, H.-G.; Daniel, D.; McCune, S.; Mekhail, T.; et al. Atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower130): A multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 924–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Boyero, L.; Sánchez-Gastaldo, A.; Alonso, M.; Noguera-Uclés, J.F.; Molina-Pinelo, S.; Bernabé-Caro, R. Primary and Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: Unveiling the Mechanisms Underlying of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy. Cancers 2020, 12, 3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Horvath, L.; Thienpont, B.; Zhao, L.; Wolf, D.; Pircher, A. Overcoming immunotherapy resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—Novel approaches and future outlook. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kargl, J.; Busch, S.E.; Yang, G.H.; Kim, K.H.; Hanke, M.L.; Metz, H.E.; Hubbard, J.J.; Lee, S.M.; Madtes, D.K.; McIntosh, M.W.; et al. Neutrophils dominate the immune cell composition in non-small cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Zilionis, R.; Engblom, C.; Pfirschke, C.; Savova, V.; Zemmour, D.; Saatcioglu, H.D.; Krishnan, I.; Maroni, G.; Meyerovitz, C.V.; Kerwin, C.M.; et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomics of Human and Mouse Lung Cancers Reveals Conserved Myeloid Populations across Individuals and Species. Immunity 2019, 50, 1317–1334.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sagiv, J.Y.; Michaeli, J.; Assi, S.; Mishalian, I.; Kisos, H.; Levy, L.; Damti, P.; Lumbroso, D.; Polyansky, L.; Sionov, R.V.; et al. Phenotypic diversity and plasticity in circulating neutrophil subpopulations in cancer. Cell Rep. 2015, 10, 562–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Shaul, M.E.; Eyal, O.; Guglietta, S.; Aloni, P.; Zlotnik, A.; Forkosh, E.; Levy, L.; Weber, L.M.; Levin, Y.; Pomerantz, A.; et al. Circulating neutrophil subsets in advanced lung cancer patients exhibit unique immune signature and relate to prognosis. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 4204–4218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Valadez-Cosmes, P.; Maitz, K.; Kindler, O.; Raftopoulou, S.; Kienzl, M.; Santiso, A.; Mihalic, Z.N.; Brcic, L.; Lindenmann, J.; Fediuk, M.; et al. Identification of Novel Low-Density Neutrophil Markers Through Unbiased High-Dimensional Flow Cytometry Screening in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 703846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hassani, M.; Hellebrekers, P.; Chen, N.; Van Aalst, C.; Bongers, S.; Hietbrink, F.; Koenderman, L.; Vrisekoop, N. On the origin of low-density neutrophils. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2020, 107, 809–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Zuazo, M.; Arasanz, H.; Fernández-Hinojal, G.; García-Granda, M.J.; Gato, M.; Bocanegra, A.; Martínez, M.; Hernández, B.; Teijeira, L.; Morilla, I.; et al. Functional systemic CD 4 immunity is required for clinical responses to PD-L1/ PD-1 blockade therapy. EMBO Mol. Med. 2019, 11, e10293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Arasanz, H.; Gondan, A.B.; Palmeiro, E.; Zuazo, M.; Ruiz, I.M.; Martínez-Aguillo, M.; Teijeira, L.; Fernández-Hinojal, G.; Chocarro, L.; Sancho, P.M.; et al. 1305P Peripheral low-density neutrophils in the response to immunotherapy in untreated non-small cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, S949–S1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Eisenhauer, E.A.; Therasse, P.; Bogaerts, J.; Schwartz, L.H.; Sargent, D.; Ford, R.; Dancey, J.; Arbuck, S.; Gwyther, S.; Mooney, M.; et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur. J. Cancer 2009, 45, 228–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wolchok, J.D.; Hoos, A.; O’Day, S.; Weber, J.S.; Hamid, O.; Lebbé, C.; Maio, M.; Binder, M.; Bohnsack, O.; Nichol, G.; et al. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Immune Therapy Activity in Solid Tumors: Immune-Related Response Criteria. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 7412–7420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Gato-Cañas, M.; Zuazo, M.; Arasanz, H.; Ibañez-Vea, M.; Lorenzo, L.; Fernandez-Hinojal, G.; Vera, R.; Smerdou, C.; Martisova, E.; Arozarena, I.; et al. PDL1 Signals through Conserved Sequence Motifs to Overcome Interferon-Mediated Cytotoxicity. Cell Rep. 2017, 20, 1818–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Arakawa, F.; Kuroki, M.; Kuwahara, M.; Senba, T.; Ozaki, H.; Matsuoka, Y.; Misumi, Y.; Kanda, H.; Watanabe, T. Cloning and Sequencing of the VH and YK Genes of an Anti-CD3 Monoclonal Antibody, and Construction of a Mouse/Human Chimeric Antibody. J. Biochem. 1996, 120, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Karwacz, K.; Bricogne, C.; MacDonald, D.; Arce, F.; Bennett, C.L.; Collins, M.; Escors, D. PD-L1 co-stimulation contributes to ligand-induced T cell receptor down-modulation on CD8 ⁺ T cells. EMBO Mol. Med. 2011, 3, 581–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mezquita, L.; Auclin, E.; Ferrara, R.; Charrier, M.; Remon, J.; Planchard, D.; Ponce, S.; Ares, L.P.; Leroy, L.; Audigier-Valette, C.; et al. Association of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018, 4, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ferrer, I.; Andrés-Benito, P.; Ausín, K.; Pamplona, R.; del Rio, J.A.; Fernández-Irigoyen, J.; Santamaría, E. Dysregulated protein phosphorylation: A determining condition in the continuum of brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol. 2021, 31, e12996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tyanova, S.; Temu, T.; Sinitcyn, P.; Carlson, A.; Hein, M.Y.; Geiger, T.; Mann, M.; Cox, J. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Murtagh, F. Multidimensional Clustering Algorithms. Fionn Murtagh. Available online: http://www.multiresolutions.com/strule/old-articles/MultidimensionalClusteringAlgorithms_FMurtagh.pdf (accessed on 9 August 2016).
Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Lyon, D.; Junge, A.; Wyder, S.; Huerta-Cepas, J.; Simonovic, M.; Doncheva, N.T.; Morris, J.H.; Bork, P.; et al. STRING v11: Protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D607–D613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Benitez, J.C.; Recondo, G.; Rassy, E.; Mezquita, L. The LIPI score and inflammatory biomarkers for selection of patients with solid tumors treated with checkpoint inhibitors. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2020, 64, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diem, S.; Schmid, S.; Krapf, M.; Flatz, L.; Born, D.; Jochum, W.; Templeton, A.J.; Früh, M. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab. Lung Cancer 2017, 111, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Glodde, N.; Bald, T.; van den Boorn-Konijnenberg, D.; Nakamura, K.; O’Donnell, J.S.; Szczepanski, S.; Brandes, M.; Eickhoff, S.; Das, I.; Shridhar, N.; et al. Reactive Neutrophil Responses Dependent on the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase c-MET Limit Cancer Immunotherapy. Immunity 2017, 47, 789–802.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Finisguerra, V.; Di Conza, G.; Di Matteo, M.; Serneels, J.; Costa, S.; Thompson, A.A.R.; Wauters, E.; Walmsley, S.; Prenen, H.; Granot, Z.; et al. MET is required for the recruitment of anti-tumoural neutrophils. Nature 2015, 522, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Koh, J.; Kim, Y.; Lee, K.Y.; Hur, J.Y.; Kim, M.S.; Kim, B.; Cho, H.J.; Lee, Y.C.; Bae, Y.H.; Ku, B.M.; et al. MDSC subtypes and CD39 expression on CD8 ⁺ T cells predict the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Eur. J. Immunol. 2020, 50, 1810–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Meyer, C.; Cagnon, L.; Costa-Nunes, C.M.; Baumgaertner, P.; Montandon, N.; Leyvraz, L.; Michielin, O.; Romano, E.; Speiser, D.E. Frequencies of circulating MDSC correlate with clinical outcome of melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2013, 63, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Youn, J.-I.; Park, S.-M.; Park, S.; Kim, G.; Lee, H.-J.; Son, J.; Hong, M.H.; Ghaderpour, A.; Baik, B.; Islam, J.; et al. Peripheral natural killer cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells correlate with anti-PD-1 responses in non-small cell lung cancer. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Akbay, E.A.; Koyama, S.; Liu, Y.; Dries, R.; Bufe, L.E.; Silkes, M.; Alam, M.; Magee, D.M.; Jones, R.; Jinushi, M.; et al. Interleukin-17A Promotes Lung Tumor Progression through Neutrophil Attraction to Tumor Sites and Mediating Resistance to PD-1 Blockade. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2017, 12, 1268–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Faget, J.; Groeneveld, S.; Boivin, G.; Sankar, M.; Zangger, N.; Garcia, M.; Guex, N.; Zlobec, I.; Steiner, L.; Piersigilli, A.; et al. Neutrophils and Snail Orchestrate the Estab-lishment of a Pro-tumor Microenvironment in Lung Cancer. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 3190–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Mezquita, L.; Preeshagul, I.; Auclin, E.; Saravia, D.; Hendriks, L.; Rizvi, H.; Park, W.; Nadal, E.; Martin-Romano, P.; Ruffinelli, J.C.; et al. Predicting immunotherapy outcomes under therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC using dNLR and its early dynamics. Eur. J. Cancer 2021, 151, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lamberti, G.; Spurr, L.F.; Li, Y.; Ricciuti, B.; Recondo, G.; Umeton, R.; Nishino, M.; Sholl, L.M.; Meyerson, M.L.; Cherniack, A.D.; et al. Clinicopathological and genomic correlates of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2020, 31, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mazieres, J.; Drilon, A.; Lusque, A.B.; Mhanna, L.; Cortot, A.; Mezquita, L.; Thai, A.A.; Mascaux, C.; Couraud, S.; Veillon, R.; et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced lung cancer and oncogenic driver alterations: Results from the IMMUNOTARGET registry. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 1321–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Principe, D.R.; Chiec, L.; Mohindra, N.A.; Munshi, H.G. Regulatory T-Cells as an Emerging Barrier to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Lung Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 684098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ferrara, R.; Naigeon, M.; Auclin, E.; Duchemann, B.; Cassard, L.; Jouniaux, J.-M.; Boselli, L.; Grivel, J.; Desnoyer, A.; Mezquita, L.; et al. Circulating T-cell Immunosenescence in Patients with Advanced Non–small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors or Platinum-based Chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 27, 492–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lee, S.S.; Cheah, Y.K. The Interplay between MicroRNAs and Cellular Components of Tumour Microenvironment (TME) on Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Progression. J. Immunol. Res. 2019, 2019, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Routy, B.; le Chatelier, E.; DeRosa, L.; Duong, C.P.M.; Alou, M.T.; Daillère, R.; Fluckiger, A.; Messaoudene, M.; Rauber, C.; Roberti, M.P.; et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1–based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science 2018, 359, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Zhang, D.; Chen, G.; Manwani, D.; Mortha, A.; Xu, C.; Faith, J.J.; Burk, R.D.; Kunisaki, Y.; Jang, J.-E.; Scheiermann, C.; et al. Neutrophil ageing is regulated by the microbiome. Nature 2015, 525, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Smith, C.K.; Trinchieri, G. The interplay between neutrophils and microbiota in cancer. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2018, 104, 701–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Giese, M.A.; Hind, L.E.; Huttenlocher, A. Neutrophil plasticity in the tumor microenvironment. Blood 2019, 133, 2159–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. (A): Top, tSNE graph of myeloid subpopulations represented by different colors. NK/NK-T cells: CD11b+, CD56+, CD14−, CD66b−. LDNs: CD11b+, CD66b+, CD116+, CD14−. Monocytes/macrophages: CD11b+, CD14+, CD116+, CD66b−. Lower left, tSNE graph of 3 responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) monotherapy. Lower right, tSNE graph representative of 3 non-responders to ICI monotherapy. (B): Left, ROC analysis of baseline low-density neutrophils (LDNs) as a function of clinical benefit rate (CBR) < 6 months. Right, baseline levels of LDN in patients receiving ICI monotherapy with CBR longer than 6 months compared with patients with CBR less than 6 months and with healthy donors. (C): Top, progression free survival stratified by the presence of baseline LDNs above the ROC threshold (7.09%). Below, overall survival stratified by the presence of baseline LDN above the ROC threshold. *** indicate highly significant (p < 0.001) statistical differences.

Figure 2. (A): Left, ROC analysis of baseline LDNs as a function of CBR < 6 months in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy (CT+IT). Right, baseline levels of LDN in patients receiving CT+IT with CBR for more than 6 months compared to patients with CBR less than 6 months. (B): Monitoring of patients with LDNs above the threshold who responded to CT+IT. (C): Scatter plot representing the association between baseline LDNs and baseline neutrophils in blood test in the whole group of patients. (D): ROC analysis of baseline neutrophils, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) as a function of CBR < 6 months in patients receiving ICI monotherapy. (E): ROC analysis of baseline neutrophils, NLR and dNLR as a function of CBR < 6 months in patients receiving CT+IT. ns indicate non-significant statistical differences.

Figure 3. (A): Cell index of A549-OKT3 cells before and after the addition of T lymphocytes from the cohorts indicated below. (B): Cell index before and after the addition of T lymphocytes from a healthy donor and plasma from the cohorts indicated below. (C): Cell index before and after the addition of plasma from the cohorts indicated below. (D): Upper left, heat-map comparing the complete identified proteome from the plasma of untreated NSCLC patients with high baseline LDN levels, of untreated squamous NSCLC patients with normal LDN levels and of untreated non-squamous NSCLC patients with normal LDN levels. Top right, heatmap comparing the complete identified proteome from the plasma of untreated NSCLC patients with high baseline LDN levels, with that of NSCLC patients with high LDN levels who progressed to platinum-based chemotherapy. Lower left, functional interactomes with significantly upregulated proteins in untreated NSCLC patients with high baseline LDN levels compared to untreated NSCLC patients with normal baseline LDN levels. Lower right, functional interactomes with significantly upregulated proteins in untreated NSCLC patients with high baseline LDN levels compared to NSCLC patients with normal baseline LDN levels who progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy. **; ***, indicate very significant (p < 0.01) and highly significant (p < 0.001) statistical differences respectively. Ns indicate non-significant statistical differences.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the ICI monotherapy cohort.

Variable		Percentage
Age	<70 ≥70	21 (67.7%)
Age	<70 ≥70	10 (33.3%)
Sex	Female Male	7 (22.6%)
Sex	Female Male	24 (77.4%)
Performance Status	0–1 2–4	27 (87.1%)
Performance Status	0–1 2–4	4 (12.9%)
Histology	Non-squamous Squamous	22 (71%)
Histology	Non-squamous Squamous	9 (29%)
Stage	Stage IIIA-C Stage IV	3 (9.7%)
Stage	Stage IIIA-C Stage IV	28 (90.3%)
Tumor burden	Less than 3 organs 3 organs or more	12 (38.7%)
Tumor burden	Less than 3 organs 3 organs or more	19 (61.3%)
Liver metastases	Yes No	8 (25.8%) 23 (74.2%)
PD-L1 tumor expression	≥50%	31 (100%)
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)	≤6 >6 Unknown	21 (67.7%) 7 (22.6%) 3 (9.7%)
Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)	≤upper limit of normal >upper limit of normal Unknown	10 (32.3%) 8 (25.8%) 13 (41.9%)
Serum albumin	≥3.5 g/dL <3.5 g/dL Unknown	20 (64.5%) 8 (25.8%) 3 (9.7%)
Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm)	0–1 2–3 Unknown	17 (54.8%) 6 (19.4%) 8 (25.8%)
Derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR)	≤3 >3 Unknown	25 (80.6%) 5 (16.1%) 1 (3.2%)
Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI)	Good/Intermediate Poor Unknown	28 (90.3%) 2 (6.5%) 1 (3.2%)

Table 2. Baseline characteristics of the CT+IT cohort.

Variable		Percentage
Age	<70 ≥70	17 (85.0%)
Age	<70 ≥70	3 (15.0%)
Sex	Female Male	5 (25.0%)
Sex	Female Male	15 (75.0%)
Performance Status	0–1 2–4	18 (90.0%)
Performance Status	0–1 2–4	2 (10.0%)
Histology	Non-squamous Squamous	18 (90.0%)
Histology	Non-squamous Squamous	2 (10.0%)
Stage	Stage IIIA-C Stage IV	1 (5.0%)
Stage	Stage IIIA-C Stage IV	19 (95.0%)
Tumor burden	Less than 3 organs 3 organs or more	5 (25.0%)
Tumor burden	Less than 3 organs 3 organs or more	15 (75.0%)
Liver metastases	Yes No	6 (30.0%) 14 (70.0%)
PD-L1 tumor expression	0% 1–4% 5–49%	13 (65.0%) 2 (10.0%) 5 (25.0%)
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)	≤6 >6	11 (55.0%) 9 (45.0%)
Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)	≤upper limit of normal >upper limit of normal Unknown	5 (25.0%) 7 (35.0%) 8 (40.0%)
Serum albumin	≥3.5 g/dL <3.5 g/dL Unknown	18 (90.0%) 1 (5.0%) 1 (5.0%)
Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm)	0–1 2–3 Unknown	13 (65.0%) 5 (25.0%) 2 (10.0%)
Derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR)	≤3 >3	12 (60.0%) 8 (40.0%)
Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI)	Good/Intermediate Poor Unknown	15 (75.0%) 3 (15.0%) 2 (10.0%)

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arasanz, H.; Bocanegra, A.I.; Morilla, I.; Fernández-Irigoyen, J.; Martínez-Aguillo, M.; Teijeira, L.; Garnica, M.; Blanco, E.; Chocarro, L.; Ausin, K.; et al. Circulating Low Density Neutrophils Are Associated with Resistance to First Line Anti-PD1/PDL1 Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 3846. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163846

AMA Style

Arasanz H, Bocanegra AI, Morilla I, Fernández-Irigoyen J, Martínez-Aguillo M, Teijeira L, Garnica M, Blanco E, Chocarro L, Ausin K, et al. Circulating Low Density Neutrophils Are Associated with Resistance to First Line Anti-PD1/PDL1 Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers. 2022; 14(16):3846. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163846

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arasanz, Hugo, Ana Isabel Bocanegra, Idoia Morilla, Joaquín Fernández-Irigoyen, Maite Martínez-Aguillo, Lucía Teijeira, Maider Garnica, Ester Blanco, Luisa Chocarro, Karina Ausin, and et al. 2022. "Circulating Low Density Neutrophils Are Associated with Resistance to First Line Anti-PD1/PDL1 Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer" Cancers 14, no. 16: 3846. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163846

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu

Circulating Low Density Neutrophils Are Associated with Resistance to First Line Anti-PD1/PDL1 Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract

Simple Summary

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Patient Enrolment

2.2. Flow Cytometry

2.3. Cell Culture

2.4. Data Collection and Statistics

2.5. Proteomics

2.6. Bioinformatics

3. Results

3.1. Study Population

3.2. Baseline Low-Density Neutrophils (LDNs) and Response to ICI Monotherapy as Frontline Treatment in NSCLC

3.3. High LDN Levels and Resistance to First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with NSCLC

3.4. Soluble Factors in Plasma from Patients with High LDN Levels Impair Antitumor Immune Response Ex Vivo

4. Discussion

5. Conclusions

Supplementary Materials

Author Contributions

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed Consent Statement

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of Interest

References

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI