Next Article in Journal
Ephrin B Activate Src Family Kinases in Fibroblasts Inducing Stromal Remodeling in Prostate Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Interconnected Adaptive Responses: A Way Out for Cancer Cells to Avoid Cellular Demise
Previous Article in Journal
Oncopeptide MBOP Encoded by LINC01234 Promotes Colorectal Cancer through MAPK Signaling Pathway
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical Considerations for Immunoparesis in Multiple Myeloma
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Regulation of NKG2D Stress Ligands and Its Relevance in Cancer Progression

Cancers 2022, 14(9), 2339; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092339
by Amber B. Jones 1, Abbey Rocco 2, Lawrence S. Lamb 3, Gregory K. Friedman 2 and Anita B. Hjelmeland 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Cancers 2022, 14(9), 2339; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092339
Submission received: 18 March 2022 / Revised: 22 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 9 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Immuno-Oncology Research)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The work is well written and provide a broad review about NKG2D mediated mechanism related with cancer with relevant references, only minor aspect should be considered:

-There is data in the literature that describe genetic variations in NKG2D gene (polymorphisms) associated with various pathologies including cancer and relate with the efficacy of NKG2D-mediated antitumor response and clinical outcome, that are not discussed in the text (e.g. Hayashi et al., 2006 or Gimeno et al., 2019)

-some errors (minor):

  • line 312: there is a typing mistake in IFN type molecule
  • Table 1 (current clinical trials): should be review since the last rows are mismatched

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

In this manuscript, Amber and Dr. Hjelmeland prepared a review article summarizing the current understanding of regulatory mechanisms controlling expression of NKG2D ligands in cancer. Overall, it is an interesting and update review manuscript; However, the novelty and strengths of this manuscript are limited, since there are already many publications reported that potential roles of NKG2D and its ligands in cancer immunotherapy. Meanwhile, the tissue specific and temporal manner of NKG2D ligands expression in human development should be discussed in this review, and the diagnostic and prognostic values of NKG2D and its ligands in cancer should be also included in this review.

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

  1. Various kinds of stresses upregulated the NKG2D ligands during tumorigenesis. Indeed, there are numerous NKG2D ligand-upregulated cases in different types of tumors (carcinomas of the breast, lung, colon, ovary, kidney, and prostate, melanomas, gliomas, and leukemia). Tumors induce NKG2D ligand suppression because of their high-upregulated population. In the introduction, there is no mention of tumors overexpressing NKG2DL, and we could be confused that NKG2D ligand expression is decreased under the average, resulting from NKG2DL dysregulation. Therefore, it would be better to ensure the step in which cancer cells attempt to escape immune surveillance through various regulatory mechanisms in specific condition after increasing NKG2D ligands during tumorigenesis.
  2. Chemotherapy makes differences in tumor cells after treatment. Sometimes, they suppress the NKG2DL expression, but sometimes they induce it. It seems pretty different by cell/tumor types or types of ligands. So it is hard to say that chemotherapy downregulates NKG2DL. Explaining these heterogeneous results or focusing on a specific tumor/ligand seems much better. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have satisfactorily responded to  all my comments, and made necessary changes to the manuscript.

Back to TopTop