Next Article in Journal
MicroRNAs miR-584-5p and miR-425-3p Are Up-Regulated in Plasma of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Patients: Targeting with Inhibitor Peptide Nucleic Acids Is Associated with Induction of Apoptosis in Colon Cancer Cell Lines
Next Article in Special Issue
Phenotype and Reactivity of Lymphocytes Expanded from Benign Prostate Hyperplasic Tissues and Prostate Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Current Biological, Pathological and Clinical Landscape of HER2-Low Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Association between a Decrease in On-Treatment Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio (NER) at Week 6 after Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab Initiation and Improved Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/cancers15010127
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Current and Future Promises of Combination Radiation and Immunotherapy for Genitourinary Cancers

by
Ava Saidian
1,
Isabella Dolendo
2,
Andrew Sharabi
3,
Tyler F. Stewart
4,5,
Brent Rose
3,5,
Rana R. McKay
4,5,
Aditya Bagrodia
1,5 and
Amirali Salmasi
1,5,*
1
Department of Urology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
2
School of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
3
Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
4
Department of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA 92161, USA
5
Moores Cancer Center, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA 92037, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(1), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010127
Submission received: 13 November 2022 / Revised: 12 December 2022 / Accepted: 22 December 2022 / Published: 25 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Immunotherapy for Genitourinary Malignancies)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Contemporary immunotherapy agents have recently been approved for use in genitourinary malignancies. Combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy may have a synergistic effect in treating bladder and prostate cancer. This article reviews the available data on combination immunotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate and bladder cancer.

Abstract

As the indications for the use of immunotherapy in genitourinary malignancies expand, its role in combination with standard or conventional therapies has become the subject of contemporary studies. Radiotherapy has multiple immunomodulating effects on anti-tumor immune response, which highlights potential synergistic role with immunotherapy agents. We sought to review the body of published data studying the combination of immunotherapy and radiotherapy as well as the rationale for combination therapy. Trial information and primary articles were obtained using the following terms “immunotherapy”, “radiotherapy”, “prostate cancer”, and “bladder cancer.” All articles and trials were screened to ensure they included combination radiotherapy and immunotherapy. The effects of radiation on the immune system, including both immunogenic and immunosuppressive effects, have been reported. There is a potential for combinatorial or synergistic effects between radiation therapy and immunotherapy in treating bladder and prostate cancers. However, results from ongoing and future clinical trials are needed to best integrate immunotherapy into current standard of care treatments for GU cancers.

1. Introduction

Bladder and prostate cancer are among the most morbid and common malignancies in the US, respectively. Radiation therapy has been well-defined in the treatment of both malignancies. Radiotherapy is one of the principal strategies for bladder-sparing trimodal therapy for the treatment of bladder cancer. In the realm of prostate cancer, radiotherapy is utilized in treatment of localized and metastatic disease with curative, adjuvant, and palliative indications [1]. The role of immunotherapy in genitourinary malignancies has widely expanded in the past decade. Multiple checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for advanced bladder cancer including frontline use, maintenance post chemotherapy, and as second-line treatment. Additionally, immunotherapy combinations are being explored across all advanced disease states. Nivolumab was recently approved for the treatment of individuals with post-cystectomy bladder cancer who are at high risk for recurrence [2]. In contrast to bladder cancer, immunotherapy has a limited role in management of prostate cancer. While sipuleucel-T was the first autologous vaccine to prolong survival for prostate cancer, subsequent unselected immunotherapy strategies have been largely unsuccessful [3,4,5]. The only current indication for immune checkpoint inhibitors is in patients with high tumor mutational burden or microsatellite instability [6,7]. Along with approval of these agents, there is a growing body of evidence highlighting the potential synergistic role of combination immunotherapy and radiotherapy. In this article, we review the immunomodulating effects of radiation and its enhancement when combined with immunotherapy, and we report on the current body of data regarding combination radiation treatment and immunotherapy in prostate and bladder cancer.

2. Materials and Methods

The goal of this narrative review is to identify and summarize the previously published and on-going studies in combined radiation and immunotherapy in the treatment of bladder and prostate cancer. A search was conducted on PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify relevant literature and trials. The key words “bladder cancer”, “prostate cancer”, “radiotherapy”, and “immunotherapy” were used to conduct our initial inquiry. A total of 23 unique bladder cancer trials and 14 prostate cancer trials that included combination radiotherapy and immunotherapy were found and included in our review.

3. Effects of Radiotherapy on the Immune System

Radiotherapy has multiple immunomodulating effects. It can induce immunogenic cell death, enhance immunogenic antigen presentation, and activate anti-tumor immune response [8]. It mediates cell death primarily via photons that damage DNA, inducing double-stranded breaks, and by generating hydroxyl free radicals [9]. Radiotherapy has also been shown to cause immunogenic cell death by activating the immune system against tumor cells and inducing a proinflammatory microenvironment [9,10]. This effect is achieved by multiple mechanisms. Firstly, tumor antigens that are typically concealed from the immune system are released during cell death, allowing antigen presenting cells to cross present tumor specific antigens to T-cells [11,12]. By increasing the exposure of tumor-specific antigens to the immune system, radiation can help stimulate an effective anti-tumor T cell response, termed an in situ vaccination effect [13,14,15].
In addition, the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), including calreticulin, a phagocytosis-promoting protein, further promotes the immune response [8,16]. When dendritic cells and antigen-presenting cells are activated, they undergo maturation and then travel to lymph nodes to prime T cells, which infiltrate into tumors [8,12,17].
Radiation has also been shown to upregulate the cell surface expression of MHC class I in a dose-dependent manner mediated by radiation-induced upregulation of mTOR, further facilitating CD8+ T cell priming [18]. Treating tumors with radiation prior to immunotherapies could enhance tumor susceptibility to immunotherapies by priming a systemic anti-tumor immune response [19,20]. Adhesion molecules such as ICAM1 and VCAM-1 on tumor vessels are also upregulated, leading to increased extravasation of T cells to tumor sites [21,22]. Radiotherapy further modifies the tumor microenvironment by upregulating certain chemokines that promote recruitment of T cells, including CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL16 [23,24,25,26]. Other proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNFα, IL-1β, and type 1 and 2 interferons, are also increased [25,27,28,29,30]. The cGAS-STING pathway mediates the activation of type 1 interferon, inducing recruitment of effector T cells and antigen presenting cells [31]. Radiation treatment also increases NKG2D ligands, activating NK cell-mediated cytolysis [32,33]. This multifaceted interaction of radiation with the immune system creates an anti-tumorigenic microenvironment that could act synergistically with immunotherapy.
In addition to its local effects, radiotherapy has also been described to have an abscopal effect, the rare phenomenon of anti-tumor responses in areas outside of the primary local irradiation site [34,35,36,37]. Although quite infrequent, triggering systemic abscopal effects through combination immunotherapy and radiation has been described by multiple groups [34]. It is hypothesized to be mediated by a systemic anti-tumor immunological response; therefore, it is postulated that the addition of immunotherapy to radiation could enhance the abscopal response, affecting distant areas and reducing overall tumor burden [38,39]. Abscopal effects at the microscopic level could have the added benefit of preventing disease recurrence by targeting microscopic seeds of metastasis [10].
While there are potential beneficial effects of radiation therapy, the effects of radiation on the immune system are complex and can also have immunosuppressive effects. For example, radiation can have bystander effects and directly inducing DNA breaks and apoptosis in local immune cells as well as mediate other immunosuppressive effects, decreasing the immunogenic responses to radiotherapy [40].
Radiation-induced lymphopenia occurs in 40–70% of patients undergoing conventional external-beam radiation [41]. Specifically in prostate cancer patients, higher rates of radiation-induced lymphopenia have been observed with pelvic nodal irradiation compared to those without [42]. Studies have shown that radiation-induced lymphopenia serves as a negative prognostic factor in some cancers [43,44]. In a study of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, patients with recurrent or residual tumors had significantly lower rates of recovery from radiation-induced lymphopenia compared to patients who were disease-free for five years [45]. Radiotherapy has also been shown to stimulate myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which are key mediators of immunosuppression by inhibiting effector T cells and inducing regulatory T cells, thus promoting tumor progression and local invasion [46,47,48,49].
One strategy to enhance the activity of radiation is to block the immunosuppressive effects of radiation and harness the pro-immunogenic effects. We further explore specific immunosuppressive effects of radiotherapy and how checkpoint blockade immunotherapies can be used to target and reverse such effects. PD-L1 has increased expression in response to radiation treatment, particularly in urothelial muscle-invasive bladder cancer [50,51]. This inhibits the cell mediated immune response by binding PD-1 receptors of tumor-specific T cells in lymph nodes [50,52]. The addition of PD-1 blockade after radiation has been shown to overcome adaptive resistance to systemic anti-tumor immunity via the PD-L1 pathway, improving local and distal tumor control [53]. In a mouse model of urothelial muscle-invasive bladder cancer, the addition of PD-1 blockade to radiation resulted in a significantly slower growth rate and improved survival compared to radiation alone [54]. Slower growth rates were observed not only in the irradiated tumors but also in the contralateral non-irradiated tumors [54]. Similarly, in a mouse model of castration-resistant prostate cancer, the combination of radiation and checkpoint inhibitors led significant increase in survival in radiation treatment combined with either anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 compared to monotherapy. Additional treatment with anti-CD8 antibody blocked the survival effect. An abscopal treatment effect was observed in radiation group [55].
Another study found that patients with oligometastatic solid tumors were treated with Sunitinib, and radiation reduced accumulation and the immune-suppressive function of MDSCs and exhibited improved progression-free survival in comparison to those only treated with radiation [47]. Radiotherapy has also been shown to upregulate cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) expressed on regulatory T cells and compete with effector T cells to bind dendritic cells, thus dampening the immune response [56,57]. A study looked at the combined use of radiation and the CTLA4 inhibitor ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Koller et al. found that compared to ipilimumab alone, the combined use of ipilimumab and radiation resulted in better median overall survival and complete response rate, but no improvement in progression-free survival was observed [58].
Additionally, regulatory T cells, which have been thought to play a role in anti-tumor immunity, have shown to be more resistant to ionizing radiation compared to other immune cell types, thus leading to their preferential proliferation [12,59,60,61]. It has been shown that depleting immunosuppressive Foxp3+ regulatory T cells enables increased T cell activation, infiltration, and tumor destruction [62]. Blocking the migration of regulatory T cells could also be an effective way to block the immunosuppressive effects of proliferating regulatory T cells [63]. The cGAS-STING pathway that induced type 1 interferon can also provide an immunosuppressive effect by upregulating transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), an anti-inflammatory cytokine [64,65,66]. TGFβ and specific stromal fibroblast populations contribute to decreased response to anti-PD-L1 agents in patients with urothelial cancer; therefore, TGFβ could provide a key target for inhibition to enhance both immunotherapy and radiotherapy responses [67,68].
The clinical benefits of combination radiation with immunotherapy have been shown in metastatic solid tumors, non-small-cell lung cancer, and metastatic renal cell carcinoma [69,70]. Despite the reported benefits of combination radiation with immunotherapy for cancer treatment, there are many questions about the optimal application of the combination remains unanswered: the questions about the ideal radiation field size, radiation dose, and fractionation, as well as ideal sequencing and immunotherapy agent [69]. While some preclinical and clinical studies have shown a more robust immune response after fractionation radiation compared with single-dose radiation, other studies have demonstrated no benefit from fractionation versus single-dose radiation [21,39,71,72,73,74]. The current data also support simultaneous administration of radiation and immunotherapy for maximal anti-cancer activity. However, further studies needed to establish the optimal timing of radiation protocol based on mechanism of immunotherapy agents [8,39,75,76].

4. Radiotherapy in Combination with Immunotherapy in Bladder Cancer

Traditionally, the gold standard for treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) was limited to chemotherapy and radical cystectomy. Recently, bladder-sparing trimodal therapy (transurethral bladder tumor resection followed by radiation and concurrent chemotherapy) has become a treatment option for MIBC [77]. Combination immunotherapy with radiation therapy in the management of bladder cancer is the primary subject of several ongoing clinical trials (Table 1).
A phase II trial (NCT02662062) demonstrated satisfactory safety and promising efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (64 Gy in 32 daily radiation fractions) in combination with 6 weekly doses of cisplatin and concurrent pembrolizumab (200 mg IV q21 days for 7 doses) in 10 patients with MIBC [77]. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined by a satisfactory low rate of unacceptable toxicity of grade 3 or 4 non-urinary adverse events or failure of completion of planned radiation therapy according to defined parameters. One patient had a dose of cisplatin withheld. Four of the ten patients experienced G3 – 4 non-urinary adverse events within 12 weeks of completing treatment. One immune-related adverse event interrupted pembrolizumab delivery (G2 nephritis). By week 24, 9/10 patients achieved a complete cystoscopic response to treatment and were free of distant metastatic disease. A similar multicenter phase II trial (NCT02621151) evaluated the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in addition to trimodal bladder preservation therapy (TMT) [78]. This study population was divided into a safety cohort (SC) and efficacy cohort (EC). Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg × 1 followed 2–3 weeks by maximal TURBT and then whole bladder radiation (52 Gy/20 fx; IMRT preferred) with twice weekly gemcitabine 27 mg/m2 and pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for three treatments. The primary endpoint was 2 y bladder-intact disease-free survival (BIDFS: first of MIBC or regional nodal recurrence, distant metastases, or death) assessed by serial cystoscopy/cytology and CT/MRI. The estimated 1-year BIDFS rate is 77% (95% CI: 0.60–0.87). Twelve-week complete response rate was 100% in SC and 83% for EC. In the EC, 35% of patients had a ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 events included UTI 8%, diarrhea 4%, colitis 4%, bladder pain/obstruction 4%, neutropenia 2%, and thrombocytopenia 2%). Pembrolizumab-related grade ≥3 adverse events included three patients (6%) with GI toxicity, of which one patient had a colonic perforation. One patient died due to fungemia, unrelated to the study therapy.
Ongoing studies are examining the role of combining immunotherapy with radiation for patients with bladder cancer. The phase II NUTRA trial (NCT03421652) is currently enrolling patients with non-MIBC for chemotherapy or cystectomy and administering nivolumab (240 mg IV q2 weeks for a maximum of 6 months) concurrently with SOC radiation therapy for bladder cancer [79]. A total radiation dose of 64 gray in 32 fractions was administered per standard of care for bladder cancer. If local lymph nodes were clinically involved, they had to be radiated. The primary outcome of the study is progression-free survival at 12 months and has yet to be reported. However, 6 of 14 patients have demonstrated a completed response: 4 had residual disease and 4 had disease progression. Nivolumab and radiation therapy toxicities were as expected: five patients needed steroids due to immune-mediated adverse events; diarrhea was observed in two patients; thyroid dysfunction was observed in two patients; and immune cystitis in was observed in one patient. No treatment related deaths were noted. A phase II trial of durvalumab plus tremelimumab with concurrent radiotherapy preliminary reported safety and efficacy of combination treatment in patients with MIBC [80]. Treatment consisted of initial TURBT followed by durvalumab 1500 mg i.v. plus tremelimumab 75 mg i.v., every 4 weeks for three doses. Normofractionated external-beam radiation was started 2 weeks later, at doses of 46 Gy to minor pelvis and 64–66 Gy to bladder. A complete response at post-treatment biopsy was documented in 26 (81%) patients: 2 patients had residual MIBC, and 4 patients were not evaluated due to rejection, clinical impairment, death from COVID 19, and a suspected treatment-related death from peritonitis (one each). After a median follow up of 6.1 months (2.5–20.1), two patients underwent salvage cystectomy because of MIBC and T1 relapses. The estimated 6-month rates for disease-free survival (DFS) with bladder intact, DFS, and overall survival were 76% (95%CI, 61–5%), 80% (95%CI, 66–98%) and 93% (95%CI, 85–100%),. A total of 31 (97%) patients experienced adverse events related to radiation and/or immunotherapy, with diarrhea (41%) and urinary disorders (37.5%) as the most frequent. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy were reported in 31% of patients, the most frequent being gastrointestinal toxicity (12.5%), acute kidney failure (6%), and hepatitis (6%). In another ongoing trial (NCT04936230), Himanshu et al. are evaluating the effect of stereotactic body radiation therapy (3 fractions over 2 weeks) in combination with atezolizumab in platinum ineligible/refractory metastatic urothelial cancer.
These results highlight the potential for radiation to synergize with immunotherapy in treatment of MIBC. However, checkpoint blockade immunotherapies are not intrinsic radiosensitizers and do not function primarily to enhance DNA damage from radiation. Currently, platinum-based chemotherapies remain the most effective radiosensitizers known, and, thus, caution should be taken when trying to replace platinum-based chemotherapies with immunotherapies. Alternatively, the use of immunotherapy after completion of a course of radiation or chemoradiation may be an advantageous strategy to enhance immune-mediated clearance after maximal tumor cytoreduction. The results from ongoing clinical trials are highly anticipated and will provide clinical evidence on how to best integrate immunotherapies with the current conventional modalities.

5. Radiotherapy in Combination with Immunotherapy in Prostate Cancer

There are a myriad of ongoing trials studying the role of combined radiotherapy and immunotherapy in prostate cancer (Table 2). However, only a few RCTs have published results. A phase II trial randomized 49 patients with mCRPC to either sipuleucel-T alone or sipuleucel-T preceded by external-beam radiation therapy [63]. There was no statistically significant difference in progression free survival (p = 0.06) between the combination EBRT + sipuleucel-T arm (3.65 months) and the sipuleucel-T only arm (2.46 months). A single-arm phase II trial evaluated the utility of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in addition to sipuleucel-T in patients with mCRPC. The median time to progression was 1.2 weeks (95% CI 6.8–14.0 weeks). [64] Unlike the phase II randomized trial combining EBRT and sipuleucel-T, this regimen did induce humoral and cellular immune responses. However, the immune response induced by stereotactic ablative radiotherapy did not yield a clinical benefit compared to previously reported outcomes of patients treated with sipuleucel-T.
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase III trial for men with mCRPC (with at least one bone metastasis) who had progressed on docetaxel randomized radiotherapy followed by ipilimumab (10 mg/kg q 3 weeks) vs. radiotherapy followed by placebo was reported by Kwon ED. et al [62]. The study was powered for a primary endpoint of overall survival. Unfortunately, in the initially report there was no significant difference in median overall survival of 11.2 months (95% CI 9.5–12.7) in the experimental arm versus 10.0 months (95% CI 8.3–11.0) in the placebo group; however, the p value was very close to significance at p = 0.053. In a subsequent subset analysis, there appeared to be a meaningful benefit to ipilimumab in men with a good performance status and absence of visceral metastases. Furthermore, in a recent pre-planned final analysis of this phase III trial, there was an excess of long-term survivors in the radiation plus ipilimumab arm with overall survival rates at 3 years and 5 years approximately two to three times higher in the radiotherapy + ipilimumab arm [81]. These data indicate that checkpoint blockade immunotherapies may have activity in a subset of men with prostate cancer and that additional biomarkers may be needed to guide precision medicine and identify those patients who are most likely to benefit from combinatorial therapies.

6. Conclusions

Radiation therapy remains one of the most effective anti-cancer treatments available and is part of the standard of care for many different types of cancer. The effects of radiation on the immune system, including both immunogenic and immunosuppressive effects, have been reported. Thus, there is a potential for combinatorial or synergistic effects between RT and immunotherapy in treating GU malignancies. However, results from ongoing and future clinical trials are needed to help guide ideal radiation field size, RT dose and fractionation, as well as ideal sequencing to best integrate immunotherapy into the current standard of care treatments for GU cancers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. (Ava Saidian), I.D., A.S. (Andrew Sharabi), T.F.S., B.R., R.R.M., A.B. and A.S. (Amirali Salmasi), Writing—original draft preparation, A.S. (Ava Saidian), I.D.; writing—review and editing, A.S. (Ava Saidian), I.D., A.S. (Andrew Sharabi), T.F.S., B.R., R.R.M., A.B. and A.S. (Amirali Salmasi); supervision, A.S. (Andrew Sharabi), T.F.S., B.R., R.R.M., A.B. and A.S.(Amirali Salmasi); project administration, A.S. (Ava Saidian) and A.S. (Amirali Salmasi). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pinkawa, M.; Schoth, F.; Bohmer, D.; Hatiboglu, G.; Sharabi, A.; Song, D.; Eble, M.J. Current standards and future directions for prostate cancer radiation therapy. Expert. Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2013, 13, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bajorin, D.F.; Witjes, J.A.; Gschwend, J.E.; Schenker, M.; Valderrama, B.P.; Tomita, Y.; Bamias, A.; Lebret, T.; Shariat, S.F.; Park, S.H.; et al. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 2102–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Handy, C.E.; Antonarakis, E.S. Sipuleucel-T for the treatment of prostate cancer: Novel insights and future directions. Future Oncol. 2018, 14, 907–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gardner, T.A.; Elzey, B.D.; Hahn, N.M. Sipuleucel-T (Provenge) autologous vaccine approved for treatment of men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2012, 8, 534–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Wang, I.; Song, L.; Wang, B.Y.; Rezazadeh Kalebasty, A.; Uchio, E.; Zi, X. Prostate cancer immunotherapy: A review of recent advancements with novel treatment methods and efficacy. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Urol. 2022, 10, 210–233. [Google Scholar]
  6. Graf, R.P.; Fisher, V.; Weberpals, J.; Gjoerup, O.; Tierno, M.B.; Huang, R.S.P.; Sayegh, N.; Lin, D.I.; Raskina, K.; Schrock, A.B.; et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs Chemotherapy by Tumor Mutational Burden in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e225394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mosillo, C.; Calandrella, M.L.; Caserta, C.; Macrini, S.; Guida, A.; Sirgiovanni, G.; Bracarda, S. Targeted Approaches in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Which Data? Cancers 2022, 14, 4189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sharabi, A.B.; Lim, M.; DeWeese, T.L.; Drake, C.G. Radiation and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy: Radiosensitisation and potential mechanisms of synergy. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16, e498–e509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Daro-Faye, M.; Kassouf, W.; Souhami, L.; Marcq, G.; Cury, F.; Niazi, T.; Sargos, P. Combined radiotherapy and immunotherapy in urothelial bladder cancer: Harnessing the full potential of the anti-tumor immune response. World J. Urol. 2021, 39, 1331–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Solanki, A.A.; Bossi, A.; Efstathiou, J.A.; Lock, D.; Mondini, M.; Ramapriyan, R.; Welsh, J.; Kang, J. Combining Immunotherapy with Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Genitourinary Malignancies. Eur. Urol. Oncol. 2019, 2, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Golden, E.B.; Frances, D.; Pellicciotta, I.; Demaria, S.; Helen Barcellos-Hoff, M.; Formenti, S.C. Radiation fosters dose-dependent and chemotherapy-induced immunogenic cell death. Oncoimmunology 2014, 3, e28518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sharabi, A.B.; Nirschl, C.J.; Kochel, C.M.; Nirschl, T.R.; Francica, B.J.; Velarde, E.; Deweese, T.L.; Drake, C.G. Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Augments Antigen-Specific PD-1-Mediated Antitumor Immune Responses via Cross-Presentation of Tumor Antigen. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2015, 3, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Morris, Z.S.; Guy, E.I.; Francis, D.M.; Gressett, M.M.; Werner, L.R.; Carmichael, L.L.; Yang, R.K.; Armstrong, E.A.; Huang, S.; Navid, F.; et al. In Situ Tumor Vaccination by Combining Local Radiation and Tumor-Specific Antibody or Immunocytokine Treatments. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 3929–3941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Marabelle, A.; Tselikas, L.; de Baere, T.; Houot, R. Intratumoral immunotherapy: Using the tumor as the remedy. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, xii33–xii43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pierce, R.H.; Campbell, J.S.; Pai, S.I.; Brody, J.D.; Kohrt, H.E. In-situ tumor vaccination: Bringing the fight to the tumor. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2015, 11, 1901–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Gameiro, S.R.; Jammeh, M.L.; Wattenberg, M.M.; Tsang, K.Y.; Ferrone, S.; Hodge, J.W. Radiation-induced immunogenic modulation of tumor enhances antigen processing and calreticulin exposure, resulting in enhanced T-cell killing. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Gupta, A.; Probst, H.C.; Vuong, V.; Landshammer, A.; Muth, S.; Yagita, H.; Schwendener, R.; Pruschy, M.; Knuth, A.; van den Broek, M. Radiotherapy promotes tumor-specific effector CD8+ T cells via dendritic cell activation. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Reits, E.A.; Hodge, J.W.; Herberts, C.A.; Groothuis, T.A.; Chakraborty, M.; Wansley, E.K.; Camphausen, K.; Luiten, R.M.; de Ru, A.H.; Neijssen, J.; et al. Radiation modulates the peptide repertoire, enhances MHC class I expression, and induces successful antitumor immunotherapy. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 1259–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Demaria, S.; Bhardwaj, N.; McBride, W.H.; Formenti, S.C. Combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy: A revived partnership. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2005, 63, 655–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jagodinsky, J.C.; Harari, P.M.; Morris, Z.S. The Promise of Combining Radiation Therapy With Immunotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2020, 108, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lugade, A.A.; Moran, J.P.; Gerber, S.A.; Rose, R.C.; Frelinger, J.G.; Lord, E.M. Local radiation therapy of B16 melanoma tumors increases the generation of tumor antigen-specific effector cells that traffic to the tumor. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 7516–7523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Quarmby, S.; Hunter, R.D.; Kumar, S. Irradiation induced expression of CD31, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 in human microvascular endothelial cells. Anticancer Res. 2000, 20, 3375–3381. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Matsumura, S.; Wang, B.; Kawashima, N.; Braunstein, S.; Badura, M.; Cameron, T.O.; Babb, J.S.; Schneider, R.J.; Formenti, S.C.; Dustin, M.L.; et al. Radiation-induced CXCL16 release by breast cancer cells attracts effector T cells. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 3099–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Thompson, R.F.; Maity, A. Radiotherapy and the tumor microenvironment: Mutual influence and clinical implications. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 772, 147–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Formenti, S.C.; Demaria, S. Combining radiotherapy and cancer immunotherapy: A paradigm shift. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2013, 105, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Matsumura, S.; Demaria, S. Up-regulation of the pro-inflammatory chemokine CXCL16 is a common response of tumor cells to ionizing radiation. Radiat. Res. 2010, 173, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lugade, A.A.; Sorensen, E.W.; Gerber, S.A.; Moran, J.P.; Frelinger, J.G.; Lord, E.M. Radiation-induced IFN-gamma production within the tumor microenvironment influences antitumor immunity. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 3132–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hallahan, D.E.; Spriggs, D.R.; Beckett, M.A.; Kufe, D.W.; Weichselbaum, R.R. Increased tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA after cellular exposure to ionizing radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 10104–10107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ishihara, H.; Tsuneoka, K.; Dimchev, A.B.; Shikita, M. Induction of the expression of the interleukin-1 beta gene in mouse spleen by ionizing radiation. Radiat. Res. 1993, 133, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Burnette, B.C.; Liang, H.; Lee, Y.; Chlewicki, L.; Khodarev, N.N.; Weichselbaum, R.R.; Fu, Y.X.; Auh, S.L. The efficacy of radiotherapy relies upon induction of type i interferon-dependent innate and adaptive immunity. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 2488–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ishikawa, H.; Ma, Z.; Barber, G.N. STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature 2009, 461, 788–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kim, J.Y.; Son, Y.O.; Park, S.W.; Bae, J.H.; Chung, J.S.; Kim, H.H.; Chung, B.S.; Kim, S.H.; Kang, C.D. Increase of NKG2D ligands and sensitivity to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity of tumor cells by heat shock and ionizing radiation. Exp. Mol. Med. 2006, 38, 474–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Gasser, S.; Orsulic, S.; Brown, E.J.; Raulet, D.H. The DNA damage pathway regulates innate immune system ligands of the NKG2D receptor. Nature 2005, 436, 1186–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Abuodeh, Y.; Venkat, P.; Kim, S. Systematic review of case reports on the abscopal effect. Curr. Probl. Cancer 2016, 40, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Welsh, J.W.; Tang, C.; de Groot, P.; Naing, A.; Hess, K.R.; Heymach, J.V.; Papadimitrakopoulou, V.A.; Cushman, T.R.; Subbiah, V.; Chang, J.Y.; et al. Phase II Trial of Ipilimumab with Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Disease: Outcomes, Toxicities, and Low-Dose Radiation-Related Abscopal Responses. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2019, 7, 1903–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Theelen, W.; Peulen, H.M.U.; Lalezari, F.; van der Noort, V.; de Vries, J.F.; Aerts, J.; Dumoulin, D.W.; Bahce, I.; Niemeijer, A.N.; de Langen, A.J.; et al. Effect of Pembrolizumab After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Pembrolizumab Alone on Tumor Response in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the PEMBRO-RT Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019, 5, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tree, A.C.; Jones, K.; Hafeez, S.; Sharabiani, M.T.A.; Harrington, K.J.; Lalondrelle, S.; Ahmed, M.; Huddart, R.A. Dose-limiting Urinary Toxicity With Pembrolizumab Combined With Weekly Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy in Bladder Cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2018, 101, 1168–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Demaria, S.; Ng, B.; Devitt, M.L.; Babb, J.S.; Kawashima, N.; Liebes, L.; Formenti, S.C. Ionizing radiation inhibition of distant untreated tumors (abscopal effect) is immune mediated. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2004, 58, 862–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Dewan, M.Z.; Galloway, A.E.; Kawashima, N.; Dewyngaert, J.K.; Babb, J.S.; Formenti, S.C.; Demaria, S. Fractionated but not single-dose radiotherapy induces an immune-mediated abscopal effect when combined with anti-CTLA-4 antibody. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 5379–5388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Mukherjee, B.; McEllin, B.; Camacho, C.V.; Tomimatsu, N.; Sirasanagandala, S.; Nannepaga, S.; Hatanpaa, K.J.; Mickey, B.; Madden, C.; Maher, E.; et al. EGFRvIII and DNA double-strand break repair: A molecular mechanism for radioresistance in glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 4252–4259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ellsworth, S.G. Field size effects on the risk and severity of treatment-induced lymphopenia in patients undergoing radiation therapy for solid tumors. Adv. Radiat. Oncol. 2018, 3, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Schad, M.D.; Dutta, S.W.; Muller, D.M.; Wijesooriya, K.; Showalter, T.N. Radiation-related Lymphopenia after Pelvic Nodal Irradiation for Prostate Cancer. Adv. Radiat. Oncol. 2019, 4, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Liu, L.T.; Chen, Q.Y.; Tang, L.Q.; Guo, S.S.; Guo, L.; Mo, H.Y.; Chen, M.Y.; Zhao, C.; Guo, X.; Qian, C.N.; et al. The Prognostic Value of Treatment-Related Lymphopenia in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients. Cancer Res. Treat. 2018, 50, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Damen, P.J.J.; Kroese, T.E.; van Hillegersberg, R.; Schuit, E.; Peters, M.; Verhoeff, J.J.C.; Lin, S.H.; van Rossum, P.S.N. The Influence of Severe Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia on Overall Survival in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2021, 111, 936–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. O’Toole, C.; Unsgaard, B. Clinical status and rate of recovery of blood lymphocyte levels after radiotherapy for bladder cancer. Cancer Res. 1979, 39, 840–843. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Kumar, V.; Patel, S.; Tcyganov, E.; Gabrilovich, D.I. The Nature of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment. Trends Immunol. 2016, 37, 208–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Chen, H.M.; Ma, G.; Gildener-Leapman, N.; Eisenstein, S.; Coakley, B.A.; Ozao, J.; Mandeli, J.; Divino, C.; Schwartz, M.; Sung, M.; et al. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells as an Immune Parameter in Patients with Concurrent Sunitinib and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 4073–4085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Liang, H.; Deng, L.; Hou, Y.; Meng, X.; Huang, X.; Rao, E.; Zheng, W.; Mauceri, H.; Mack, M.; Xu, M.; et al. Host STING-dependent MDSC mobilization drives extrinsic radiation resistance. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Nakamura, T.; Ushigome, H. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells as a Regulator of Immunity in Organ Transplantation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wu, C.T.; Chen, W.C.; Chang, Y.H.; Lin, W.Y.; Chen, M.F. The role of PD-L1 in the radiation response and clinical outcome for bladder cancer. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Deng, L.; Liang, H.; Burnette, B.; Beckett, M.; Darga, T.; Weichselbaum, R.R.; Fu, Y.X. Irradiation and anti-PD-L1 treatment synergistically promote antitumor immunity in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Iwai, Y.; Ishida, M.; Tanaka, Y.; Okazaki, T.; Honjo, T.; Minato, N. Involvement of PD-L1 on tumor cells in the escape from host immune system and tumor immunotherapy by PD-L1 blockade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 12293–12297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Dovedi, S.J.; Cheadle, E.J.; Popple, A.L.; Poon, E.; Morrow, M.; Stewart, R.; Yusko, E.C.; Sanders, C.M.; Vignali, M.; Emerson, R.O.; et al. Fractionated Radiation Therapy Stimulates Antitumor Immunity Mediated by Both Resident and Infiltrating Polyclonal T-cell Populations when Combined with PD-1 Blockade. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 5514–5526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Rompre-Brodeur, A.; Shinde-Jadhav, S.; Ayoub, M.; Piccirillo, C.A.; Seuntjens, J.; Brimo, F.; Mansure, J.J.; Kassouf, W. PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibition with Radiation in Bladder Cancer: In Situ and Abscopal Effects. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2020, 19, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Dudzinski, S.O.; Cameron, B.D.; Wang, J.; Rathmell, J.C.; Giorgio, T.D.; Kirschner, A.N. Combination immunotherapy and radiotherapy causes an abscopal treatment response in a mouse model of castration resistant prostate cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Persa, E.; Balogh, A.; Safrany, G.; Lumniczky, K. The effect of ionizing radiation on regulatory T cells in health and disease. Cancer Lett. 2015, 368, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Balogh, A.; Persa, E.; Bogdandi, E.N.; Benedek, A.; Hegyesi, H.; Safrany, G.; Lumniczky, K. The effect of ionizing radiation on the homeostasis and functional integrity of murine splenic regulatory T cells. Inflamm. Res. 2013, 62, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Koller, K.M.; Mackley, H.B.; Liu, J.; Wagner, H.; Talamo, G.; Schell, T.D.; Pameijer, C.; Neves, R.I.; Anderson, B.; Kokolus, K.M.; et al. Improved survival and complete response rates in patients with advanced melanoma treated with concurrent ipilimumab and radiotherapy versus ipilimumab alone. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2017, 18, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Dannull, J.; Su, Z.; Rizzieri, D.; Yang, B.K.; Coleman, D.; Yancey, D.; Zhang, A.; Dahm, P.; Chao, N.; Gilboa, E.; et al. Enhancement of vaccine-mediated antitumor immunity in cancer patients after depletion of regulatory T cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 3623–3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Qu, Y.; Jin, S.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, B.; Shi, X.; Wang, J.; Zhao, Y. Gamma-ray resistance of regulatory CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells in mice. Radiat. Res. 2010, 173, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Muroyama, Y.; Nirschl, T.R.; Kochel, C.M.; Lopez-Bujanda, Z.; Theodros, D.; Mao, W.; Carrera-Haro, M.A.; Ghasemzadeh, A.; Marciscano, A.E.; Velarde, E.; et al. Stereotactic Radiotherapy Increases Functionally Suppressive Regulatory T Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2017, 5, 992–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Colbeck, E.J.; Jones, E.; Hindley, J.P.; Smart, K.; Schulz, R.; Browne, M.; Cutting, S.; Williams, A.; Parry, L.; Godkin, A.; et al. Treg Depletion Licenses T Cell-Driven HEV Neogenesis and Promotes Tumor Destruction. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2017, 5, 1005–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Li, C.; Jiang, P.; Wei, S.; Xu, X.; Wang, J. Regulatory T cells in tumor microenvironment: New mechanisms, potential therapeutic strategies and future prospects. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Trapani, J.A. The dual adverse effects of TGF-beta secretion on tumor progression. Cancer Cell 2005, 8, 349–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Yang, L.; Pang, Y.; Moses, H.L. TGF-beta and immune cells: An important regulatory axis in the tumor microenvironment and progression. Trends Immunol. 2010, 31, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Wrzesinski, S.H.; Wan, Y.Y.; Flavell, R.A. Transforming growth factor-beta and the immune response: Implications for anticancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 5262–5270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Wilkins, A.; Ost, P.; Sundahl, N. Is There a Benefit of Combining Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy in Bladder Cancer? Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.) 2021, 33, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mariathasan, S.; Turley, S.J.; Nickles, D.; Castiglioni, A.; Yuen, K.; Wang, Y.; Kadel, E.E., III; Koeppen, H.; Astarita, J.L.; Cubas, R.; et al. TGFbeta attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells. Nature 2018, 554, 544–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lei, H.; Shi, M.; Xu, H.; Bai, S.; Xiong, X.; Wei, Q.; Yang, L. Combined Treatment of Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy for Urological Malignancies: Current Evidence and Clinical Considerations. Cancer Manag. Res. 2021, 13, 1719–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Masini, C.; Iotti, C.; De Giorgi, U.; Bellia, R.S.; Buti, S.; Salaroli, F.; Zampiva, I.; Mazzarotto, R.; Mucciarini, C.; Vitale, M.G.; et al. Nivolumab in Combination with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Pretreated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Results of the Phase II NIVES Study. Eur. Urol. 2022, 81, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Demaria, S.; Formenti, S.C. Radiation as an immunological adjuvant: Current evidence on dose and fractionation. Front. Oncol. 2012, 2, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Tsai, M.H.; Cook, J.A.; Chandramouli, G.V.; DeGraff, W.; Yan, H.; Zhao, S.; Coleman, C.N.; Mitchell, J.B.; Chuang, E.Y. Gene expression profiling of breast, prostate, and glioma cells following single versus fractionated doses of radiation. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 3845–3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. John-Aryankalayil, M.; Palayoor, S.T.; Cerna, D.; Simone, C.B., 2nd; Falduto, M.T.; Magnuson, S.R.; Coleman, C.N. Fractionated radiation therapy can induce a molecular profile for therapeutic targeting. Radiat. Res. 2010, 174, 446–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lee, Y.; Auh, S.L.; Wang, Y.; Burnette, B.; Wang, Y.; Meng, Y.; Beckett, M.; Sharma, R.; Chin, R.; Tu, T.; et al. Therapeutic effects of ablative radiation on local tumor require CD8+ T cells: Changing strategies for cancer treatment. Blood 2009, 114, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dovedi, S.J.; Adlard, A.L.; Lipowska-Bhalla, G.; McKenna, C.; Jones, S.; Cheadle, E.J.; Stratford, I.J.; Poon, E.; Morrow, M.; Stewart, R.; et al. Acquired resistance to fractionated radiotherapy can be overcome by concurrent PD-L1 blockade. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 5458–5468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Young, K.H.; Baird, J.R.; Savage, T.; Cottam, B.; Friedman, D.; Bambina, S.; Messenheimer, D.J.; Fox, B.; Newell, P.; Bahjat, K.S.; et al. Optimizing Timing of Immunotherapy Improves Control of Tumors by Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Weickhardt, A.J.; Foroudi, F.; Lawrentschuk, N.; Galleta, L.; Seegum, A.; Herschtal, A.; Link, E.; McJannett, M.M.; Liow, E.C.H.; Grimison, P.S.; et al. Pembrolizumab with chemoradiotherapy as treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer: A planned interim analysis of safety and efficacy of the PCR-MIB phase II clinical trial (ANZUP 1502). J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Balar, A.V.; Milowsky, M.I.; O’Donnell, P.H.; Alva, A.S.; Kollmeier, M.; Rose, T.L.; Pitroda, S.; Kaffenberger, S.D.; Rosenberg, J.E.; Francese, K.; et al. Pembrolizumab (pembro) in combination with gemcitabine (Gem) and concurrent hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) as bladder sparing treatment for muscle-invasive urothelial cancer of the bladder (MIBC): A multicenter phase 2 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 4504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vaishampayan, U.N.; Heilbrun, L.K.; Vaishampayan, N.; Li, C.; Shi, D.; Frazier, A.; Maier, J.; Dickow, B.; Kuettel, M.; Chatta, G.; et al. Phase II trial of concurrent nivolumab in urothelial bladder cancer with radiation therapy in localized/locally advanced disease for chemotherapy ineligible patients [NUTRA trial]. Ann. Oncol. 2020, 31, S596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Muro, X.G.d.; Valderrama, B.P.; Medina, A.; Cuellar, M.A.; Etxaniz, O.; Sarrió, R.G.; Juan-Fita, M.J.; Ferrer, F.; Rodríguez, I.M.; Lendínez-Cano, G.; et al. Phase II trial of durvalumab plus tremelimumab with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) in patients (pts) with localized muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with a selective bladder preservation approach: IMMUNOPRESERVE-SOGUG trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 4505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fizazi, K.; Drake, C.G.; Beer, T.M.; Kwon, E.D.; Scher, H.I.; Gerritsen, W.R.; Bossi, A.; den Eertwegh, A.; Krainer, M.; Houede, N.; et al. Final Analysis of the Ipilimumab Versus Placebo Following Radiotherapy Phase III Trial in Postdocetaxel Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Identifies an Excess of Long-term Survivors. Eur. Urol. 2020, 78, 822–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Clinical Trials of Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy in Bladder Cancer.
Table 1. Clinical Trials of Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy in Bladder Cancer.
StudyPhaseInterventionPatient StageStatus
NCT03950362
[PREVERT]		IIAvelumab + RT<pT2 N0M0Not yet recruiting
NCT03529890
[RACE-IT]		IINivolumab + RT + radical cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomycT3 –T4 cN0/N + cM0Active, not recruiting
NCT05445648
[CBPTMI]		IITislelizumab + TURBT + RTcT2 –T4a N0M0Not yet recruiting
NCT04543110
[RADIANT]		IIDurvalumab + RTcT2 –T4a N0M0Recruiting
NCT03702179
[IMMUNOPRESERVE]		IINCT04216290 + tremelimumab + RTcT2 –T4a N0M0Active, not recruiting
NCT03747419IIAvelumab + RT≥pT2, cN0M0Recruiting
NCT04216290
[INSPIRE]		IIdurvalumab + RT + chemotherapyAny T, any N, M0Recruiting
NCT02560636
[PLUMMB]		IPembrolizumab + RT T2 –4, N0 –3, M0 –1Recruiting
NCT04902040I/IIPlinabulin + RT+ atezolizumab or Avelumab or durvalumab or Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab Any T, any N, M+Recruiting
NCT04936230IIAtezolizumab + SBRTAny T, any N, pM+Recruiting
NCT03617913IIAvelumab + RT + cisplatin chemotherapypT2 –T4a N0M0Completed
NCT03697850
[BladderSpar]		IIAtezolizumab + chemo-radiotherapypT2 –T3 cM0Recruiting
NCT02621151IIPembrolizumab + EBRT + gemcitabine + TURBTT2 –T4a, N0M0Active, not recruiting
NCT03693014IISBRT + ipilimumab + nivolumab + pembrolizumab + atezolizumabAny T, any N, M+Recruiting
NCT03775265IIIAtezolizumab + chemoradiotherapyT2 –T4a N0M0Recruiting
NCT05531123IITislelizumab + modified hypofractionation + gemcitabine and cisplatincT2 –4a, N0 –1, M0Not yet recruiting
NCT05241340
[RAD-VACCINE]		IISasanlimab + SBRT + radical cystectomycT2 –4a N0M0Recruiting
NCT05259319
[IMMUNOs-SBRT]		IAtezolizumab + tiragolumab + SBRTcM+Not yet recruiting
NCT03915678
[AGADIR]		IIAtezolizumab + BDB001 (toll-like receptor agonist) + RTcM+Recruiting
NCT03589339INivolumab or pembrolizumab + SMRTcM+ (<5 lesions)Recruiting
NCT04977453I/IIGI-101 + RT“Advanced and/or metastatic”Recruiting
NCT04241185
[KEYNOTE-992]		IIIPembrolizumab + RT + ciplatin + 5-FU + Mytomycin C + gemcitabine vs. Placebo to pembrolizumabcT2 –T4, N0M0Recruiting
NCT03768570IITrimodality therapy +/- durvalumabcT2 –T4 N0M0Recruiting
Table
Table 2. Clinical Trials of Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer.
Table 2. Clinical Trials of Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer.
StudyPhaseInterventionPatient PopulationStatus
NCT01436968
[PrTK03]		IIIAglatimagene besadenovec + valacyclovir + standard RTIntermediate or high risk (1 high risk feature), M0Active, not recruiting
NCT02107430IIDendritic cells DCVAC/PCa + standard RTHigh or very high riskCompleted
NCT03543189I/IINivolumab + brachytherapy + EBRTGrade group 5, any PSA or T stageRecruiting
NCT01807065IISipuleucel-T + EBRTmCRPCCompleted
NCT03795207
[POSTCARD]		IIDurvalumab + SBRTBiochemical recurrence (BCR), M0Recruiting
NCT05361798IIImmunocytokine M9241 + SBRTBCR, ≤5 bone or LN metastasesRecruiting
NCT01818986IISipuleucel-T + SBRTmCRPCCompleted
NCT04071236I/IIAvelumab + radium Ra 223 dichloridemCRPCRecruiting
NCT02232230Retrospective observationalProvenge + RTmCRPCCompleted
NCT03007732IIPembrolizumab + SBRT +/- intratumoral SD-101mCSPCRecruiting
NCT00005916IIPSA-Based Vaccine + RTTreatment naïve local diseaseCompleted
NCT04946370I/II225Ac-J591 (a drug that can deliver radiation to prostate cancer cells) + pembrolizumabmCRPCRecruiting
NCT03217747I/IIAvelumab + utomilumab + RTmCRPCActive, not recruiting
NCT02463799IIRadium-223 + sipuleucel-TmCRPCCompleted
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saidian, A.; Dolendo, I.; Sharabi, A.; Stewart, T.F.; Rose, B.; McKay, R.R.; Bagrodia, A.; Salmasi, A. The Current and Future Promises of Combination Radiation and Immunotherapy for Genitourinary Cancers. Cancers 2023, 15, 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010127

AMA Style

Saidian A, Dolendo I, Sharabi A, Stewart TF, Rose B, McKay RR, Bagrodia A, Salmasi A. The Current and Future Promises of Combination Radiation and Immunotherapy for Genitourinary Cancers. Cancers. 2023; 15(1):127. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saidian, Ava, Isabella Dolendo, Andrew Sharabi, Tyler F. Stewart, Brent Rose, Rana R. McKay, Aditya Bagrodia, and Amirali Salmasi. 2023. "The Current and Future Promises of Combination Radiation and Immunotherapy for Genitourinary Cancers" Cancers 15, no. 1: 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010127

APA Style

Saidian, A., Dolendo, I., Sharabi, A., Stewart, T. F., Rose, B., McKay, R. R., Bagrodia, A., & Salmasi, A. (2023). The Current and Future Promises of Combination Radiation and Immunotherapy for Genitourinary Cancers. Cancers, 15(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010127

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop