Next Article in Journal
Circulating Tumor Cells: From the Laboratory to the Cancer Clinic; A Closing Comment
Previous Article in Journal
Alarming Upward Trend in Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in a Large Cohort of Immunocompromised Children: A Four-Year Comparative Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Biology of Ovarian Cancer: From Mechanisms of Intraperitoneal Metastasis to Therapeutic Opportunities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/cancers15030937
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Cancers 2020, 12(2), 296.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Pakuła et al. Deciphering the Molecular Mechanism of Spontaneous Senescence in Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells. Cancers 2020, 12, 296

by
Martyna Pakuła
1,
Ewa Mały
2,
Paweł Uruski
1,
Anna Witucka
1,
Małgorzata Bogucka
2,
Natalia Jaroszewska
2,
Nicoletta Makowska
2,
Arkadiusz Niklas
1,
Rafał Moszyński
3,
Stefan Sajdak
3,
Andrzej Tykarski
1,
Justyna Mikuła-Pietrasik
1,† and
Krzysztof Książek
1,*,†
1
Department of Hypertensiology, Angiology and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Długa 1/2 Str., 61-848 Poznan, Poland
2
Poznan University of Medical Sciences Core Facility, Rokietnicka 8 Str., 60-806 Poznan, Poland
3
Division of Gynecological Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Polna 33 Str., 60-535 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2023, 15(3), 937; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030937
Submission received: 26 November 2022 / Accepted: 7 December 2022 / Published: 2 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Biology of Ovarian Cancer: From Mechanisms of Intraperitoneal Metastasis to Therapeutic Opportunities)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Error in Figures

In the original publication [1], a mistake was identified in Figure 5 and Figure 7. In Figure 5, new bands for FOXO4 and JAK3 proteins have been inserted that are consistent with the original uncut membranes included in the supplement. The results have been re-analyzed densitometrically, and new graphs for these proteins are included in panel (b). In Figure 7, one of the SA-β-Gal images that was mistakenly duplicated (control PFBs) has been replaced with the correct one.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Pakuła, M.; Mały, E.; Uruski, P.; Witucka, A.; Bogucka, M.; Jaroszewska, N.; Makowska, N.; Niklas, A.; Moszyński, R.; Sajdak, S.; et al. Deciphering the molecular mechanism of spontaneous senescence of primary epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Cancers 2020, 12, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cancers 15 00937 g005 550
Figure 5. Changes in the expression of signaling molecules during senescence of pEOCs determined using immunoblotting. (a) Samples corresponding to 1 × 104 (AKT, AP-1, ERK1/2, JNK, NF-κB, p38 MAPK, STAT3), 4 × 104 (FOXO4, JAK3), and 5 × 104 (β-actin) cells were subjected to SDS–PAGE to eliminate the risk of incorrect results due to senescence-associated cell hypertrophy and related differences in protein content between young and senescent cells. (b) Densitometric analysis of bands corresponding to young and senescent cells. Results are based on five to six independent experiments using pEOCs obtained from different patients. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 vs. early-passage cells.
Figure 5. Changes in the expression of signaling molecules during senescence of pEOCs determined using immunoblotting. (a) Samples corresponding to 1 × 104 (AKT, AP-1, ERK1/2, JNK, NF-κB, p38 MAPK, STAT3), 4 × 104 (FOXO4, JAK3), and 5 × 104 (β-actin) cells were subjected to SDS–PAGE to eliminate the risk of incorrect results due to senescence-associated cell hypertrophy and related differences in protein content between young and senescent cells. (b) Densitometric analysis of bands corresponding to young and senescent cells. Results are based on five to six independent experiments using pEOCs obtained from different patients. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 vs. early-passage cells.
Cancers 15 00937 g005
Cancers 15 00937 g007 550
Figure 7. Effect of normal peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMCs) and fibroblasts (HPFBs) on senescence induction in pEOCs. (a) Changes in SA-β-Gal, γ-H2A.X, and 53BP1 levels in pEOCs upon exposure to conditioned medium (CM) from young and senescent (a) HPMCs and (b) HPFBs. (c) Representative staining of SA-β-Gal, γ-H2A.X, and 53BP1 in pEOCs subjected to CM generated by HPMCs and HPFBs. Results are based on six independent experiments using pEOCs obtained from different patients. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.; # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01. vs. CM from senescent cells. RFU—relative fluorescence units.
Figure 7. Effect of normal peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMCs) and fibroblasts (HPFBs) on senescence induction in pEOCs. (a) Changes in SA-β-Gal, γ-H2A.X, and 53BP1 levels in pEOCs upon exposure to conditioned medium (CM) from young and senescent (a) HPMCs and (b) HPFBs. (c) Representative staining of SA-β-Gal, γ-H2A.X, and 53BP1 in pEOCs subjected to CM generated by HPMCs and HPFBs. Results are based on six independent experiments using pEOCs obtained from different patients. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.; # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01. vs. CM from senescent cells. RFU—relative fluorescence units.
Cancers 15 00937 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pakuła, M.; Mały, E.; Uruski, P.; Witucka, A.; Bogucka, M.; Jaroszewska, N.; Makowska, N.; Niklas, A.; Moszyński, R.; Sajdak, S.; et al. Correction: Pakuła et al. Deciphering the Molecular Mechanism of Spontaneous Senescence in Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells. Cancers 2020, 12, 296. Cancers 2023, 15, 937. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030937

AMA Style

Pakuła M, Mały E, Uruski P, Witucka A, Bogucka M, Jaroszewska N, Makowska N, Niklas A, Moszyński R, Sajdak S, et al. Correction: Pakuła et al. Deciphering the Molecular Mechanism of Spontaneous Senescence in Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells. Cancers 2020, 12, 296. Cancers. 2023; 15(3):937. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030937

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pakuła, Martyna, Ewa Mały, Paweł Uruski, Anna Witucka, Małgorzata Bogucka, Natalia Jaroszewska, Nicoletta Makowska, Arkadiusz Niklas, Rafał Moszyński, Stefan Sajdak, and et al. 2023. "Correction: Pakuła et al. Deciphering the Molecular Mechanism of Spontaneous Senescence in Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells. Cancers 2020, 12, 296" Cancers 15, no. 3: 937. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030937

APA Style

Pakuła, M., Mały, E., Uruski, P., Witucka, A., Bogucka, M., Jaroszewska, N., Makowska, N., Niklas, A., Moszyński, R., Sajdak, S., Tykarski, A., Mikuła-Pietrasik, J., & Książek, K. (2023). Correction: Pakuła et al. Deciphering the Molecular Mechanism of Spontaneous Senescence in Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells. Cancers 2020, 12, 296. Cancers, 15(3), 937. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030937

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop