Next Article in Journal
Deep Learning Model Based on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Imaging to Predict Postoperative Early Recurrence after the Curative Resection of a Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer Patients: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
miR-146a-5p Promotes Angiogenesis and Confers Trastuzumab Resistance in HER2+ Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endoscopic Ultrasound Advanced Techniques for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pattern of Distribution of Lymph Node Metastases in Individual Stations in Middle and Lower Gastric Carcinoma

1
Dipartimento Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endocrino Metaboliche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy
2
Dipartimento Universitario di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
3
Unità Operativa di Chirurgia Generale, Dipartimento di Chirurgia, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale, 87100 Cosenza, Italy
4
Unità Operativa di Chirurgia d’Urgenza e del Trauma, Dipartimento Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endocrino Metaboliche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy
5
Unità Operativa di Chirurgia Oncologica della tiroide e della paratiroide, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, 80131 Napoli, Italy
6
Unità Operativa di Chirurgia Generale e Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giuseppe Moscati, 83100 Avellino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(7), 2139; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15072139
Submission received: 19 February 2023 / Revised: 31 March 2023 / Accepted: 3 April 2023 / Published: 4 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Staging of Gastroesophageal Cancer)

Simple Summary

Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignancy with great heterogenicity, and applying the same standard to all patients in different conditions may lead to treatment bias. D2 lymphadenectomy is the elective procedure for surgical treatment of GC. Middle- and lower-third GC show a different lymphatic spread than proximal tumors. This study has limitations. The retrospective nature of this study is a potential source of intrinsic biases. Our results must be interpreted with caution because they represent only a group of patients with distal GC. However, the present study shows that the primary tumor location is related to the location of nodal metastases. The knowledge of the localization of the tumor could lead to a tailored lymphadenectomy in the case of small tumors, in consideration of the absence of involvement of stations 7 to 12 in distal T1 cancers. On the other hand, in advanced GC, both circular and longitudinal localization should be considered to concentrate the lymphadenectomy on the most interesting individual stations and, in selected cases, extending the nodal dissection also to stations that are not routinely included in the D2 lymphadenectomy.

Abstract

(1) Background: Lymph node (LN) dissection is the cornerstone of curative treatment of GC. The pattern of distribution of LN metastases is closely related to several factors. The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors determining the distribution of nodal metastases in a population of N+ distal GC patients undergoing gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy. (2) Methods: The medical charts of 162 N+ GC patients who underwent surgical resection over a 15-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical, pathological and anatomical characteristics were evaluated to identify the factors affecting the patterns and prevalence of metastases in individual LN stations. (3) Results: LN metastasis is correlated with the depth of the tumor and to diffuse-type tumors. A higher number of metastatic nodes was documented in patients with middle-third tumors (8.2 ± 7.3 vs. 4.5 ± 5.0 in lower-third tumors, p = 0.0001) and in patients with tumors located on the lesser curve. Station 4 showed the highest rate of metastases (53.1%). Concerning stations 7 to 12, station 8 showed the highest metastasis rate (28.4%). Metastases at stations 1, 2, 4 and 7 to 11 were dominant in middle-third cancer, whereas stations 5 and 6 were dominant in lower-third cancers. Station 4, 5, 6, 10 and 11 metastases were dominant when the cancer was located on the greater curve, whereas stations 1, 2, 7, 8 and 12 were dominant in lesser-curve cancers. (4) Conclusions: The study documented that in patients with distal GC, the distribution of nodal metastases at individual stations is closely related to primary tumor location.
Keywords: gastric cancer; lymphadenectomy; lymph node stations; lymph node metastasis gastric cancer; lymphadenectomy; lymph node stations; lymph node metastasis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brisinda, G.; Chiarello, M.M.; Fico, V.; Puccioni, C.; Crocco, A.; Bianchi, V.; Vanella, S. Pattern of Distribution of Lymph Node Metastases in Individual Stations in Middle and Lower Gastric Carcinoma. Cancers 2023, 15, 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15072139

AMA Style

Brisinda G, Chiarello MM, Fico V, Puccioni C, Crocco A, Bianchi V, Vanella S. Pattern of Distribution of Lymph Node Metastases in Individual Stations in Middle and Lower Gastric Carcinoma. Cancers. 2023; 15(7):2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15072139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brisinda, Giuseppe, Maria Michela Chiarello, Valeria Fico, Caterina Puccioni, Anna Crocco, Valentina Bianchi, and Serafino Vanella. 2023. "Pattern of Distribution of Lymph Node Metastases in Individual Stations in Middle and Lower Gastric Carcinoma" Cancers 15, no. 7: 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15072139

APA Style

Brisinda, G., Chiarello, M. M., Fico, V., Puccioni, C., Crocco, A., Bianchi, V., & Vanella, S. (2023). Pattern of Distribution of Lymph Node Metastases in Individual Stations in Middle and Lower Gastric Carcinoma. Cancers, 15(7), 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15072139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop