Next Article in Journal
LUNA EMG as a Marker of Adherence to Prehabilitation Programs and Its Effect on Postoperative Outcomes among Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery for Ovarian Cancer and Suspected Ovarian Tumors
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Immunotherapy Response Prediction in Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma: Leveraging Shallow and Deep Learning with CT-Based Radiomics across Single and Multiple Tumor Sites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Comparative Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy versus Conventional Comparator Treatments in Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis

by
Nicolas Girard
1,2,†,
Mariam Besada
3,†,
Basia Rogula
3,
Stefano Lucherini
4,
Lien Vo
5,
Mohammad A. Chaudhary
5,‡,
Sarah Goring
3,
Greta Lozano-Ortega
3,
Mia Tran
5,
Nebibe Varol
4,
Nathalie Waser
6,
Jay M. Lee
7 and
Jonathan Spicer
8,*
1
Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
2
Paris Saclay University, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), 78000 Versailles, France
3
BroadstreetHEOR, Vancouver, BC V6A 1A4, Canada
4
Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge UB8 1DH, UK
5
Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648, USA
6
ICON Plc, Burlington, ON L7N 3G2, Canada
7
UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
8
Department of Thoracic Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Co-first authors.
At the time research was conducted.
Cancers 2024, 16(13), 2492; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132492
Submission received: 25 May 2024 / Revised: 3 July 2024 / Accepted: 5 July 2024 / Published: 8 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)

Simple Summary

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Surgery, with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy has historically been the mainstay of treatment for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (rNSCLC). However, as many as half of those treated still die of the disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are changing the landscape of treatment both in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant rNSCLC settings in many countries. In this review and analysis, outcomes among patients treated in the neoadjuvant setting (i.e., prior to surgery) with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab combined with chemotherapy were compared to those of patients treated with the historical standard of care treatments, using data from published studies. The results of this evidence synthesis show that neoadjuvant nivolumab when combined with chemotherapy improves the likelihood of event-free survival and a pathological complete response for patients relative to traditional treatments, specifically, surgery, alone or in combination with neoadjuvant or adjuvant (i.e., after surgery) chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to estimate the relative efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy (neoNIVO + CT) compared to relevant treatments amongst resectable non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (rNSCLC) patients. Methods: Treatment comparisons were based on a network meta-analysis (NMA) using randomized clinical trial data identified via systematic literature review (SLR). The outcomes of interest were event-free survival (EFS) and pathological complete response (pCR). NeoNIVO + CT was compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neoCRT), adjuvant chemotherapy (adjCT), and surgery alone (S). Due to the potential for effect modification by stage, all-stage and stage-specific networks were considered. Fixed-effect (FE) and random-effects Bayesian NMA models were run (EFS = hazard ratios [HR]; pCR = odds ratios [OR]; 95% credible intervals [CrI]). Results: Sixty-one RCTs were identified (base case = 9 RCTs [n = 1978 patients]). In the all-stages FE model, neoNIVO + CT had statistically significant EFS improvements relative to neoCT (HR = 0.68 [95% CrI: 0.49, 0.94]), S (0.59 [0.42, 0.82]), adjCT (0.66 [0.45, 0.96]), but not relative to neoCRT (HR = 0.77 [0.52, 1.16]). NeoNIVO + CT (5 RCTs) had statistically significant higher odds of pCR relative to neoCT (OR = 12.53 [5.60, 33.82]) and neoCRT (7.15 [2.31, 24.34]). Stage-specific model findings were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: This NMA signals improved EFS and/or pCR of neoNIVO + CT relative to comparators among patients with rNSCLC.
Keywords: resectable non-small-cell lung cancer; systematic literature review; network meta-analysis resectable non-small-cell lung cancer; systematic literature review; network meta-analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Girard, N.; Besada, M.; Rogula, B.; Lucherini, S.; Vo, L.; Chaudhary, M.A.; Goring, S.; Lozano-Ortega, G.; Tran, M.; Varol, N.; et al. Comparative Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy versus Conventional Comparator Treatments in Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Cancers 2024, 16, 2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132492

AMA Style

Girard N, Besada M, Rogula B, Lucherini S, Vo L, Chaudhary MA, Goring S, Lozano-Ortega G, Tran M, Varol N, et al. Comparative Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy versus Conventional Comparator Treatments in Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Cancers. 2024; 16(13):2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132492

Chicago/Turabian Style

Girard, Nicolas, Mariam Besada, Basia Rogula, Stefano Lucherini, Lien Vo, Mohammad A. Chaudhary, Sarah Goring, Greta Lozano-Ortega, Mia Tran, Nebibe Varol, and et al. 2024. "Comparative Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy versus Conventional Comparator Treatments in Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis" Cancers 16, no. 13: 2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132492

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop