Next Article in Journal
Bevacizumab-Based Therapies in Malignant Tumors—Real-World Data on Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Krayem et al. Kinome Profiling to Predict Sensitivity to MAPK Inhibition in Melanoma and to Provide New Insights into Intrinsic and Acquired Mechanism of Resistance. Cancers 2020, 12, 512
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Post-Progression Analysis of EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Following Osimertinib Therapy in Real-World Settings

Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2024, 16(14), 2589; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16142589
Submission received: 18 June 2024 / Revised: 9 July 2024 / Accepted: 17 July 2024 / Published: 19 July 2024

Simple Summary

This study is a real-world study on a large cohort of patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progressed on osimertinib, focusing on access to subsequent treatments and progression patterns, including central nervous system (CNS) progression. Almost half of these patients had no access to further treatments due to worsening of clinical conditions or death. The outcomes of standard platinum-based chemotherapy were dismal and in line with those reported in the literature. Notably, intracranial disease progression was a rare event during osimertinib, whereas it occurred in half the patients during standard chemotherapy. Overall, the data highlight the clinical unmet needs in the treatment sequencing of single agent osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy alone, confirming the role of combination approaches and treatments in improving CNS control.

Abstract

Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the current standard treatment option in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress on osimertinib. However, outcomes with chemotherapy are dismal, and the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) disease is an unmet need in this setting. Methods: Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were candidates to receive osimertinib in the metastatic setting at our Center from 2015 to 2022 were retrospectively evaluated to identify patients who received standard platinum-based chemotherapy post-osimertinib. Data were collected on treatment outcomes, with a focus on brain metastases and progression patterns. Results: A total of 220 patients received indication for osimertinib in the study period; n = 176 had adequate follow-up data. Overall, n = 117 patients experienced disease progression on osimertinib. The median time to osimertinib progressive disease (PD) was 15 months (95% confidence interval CI 13–18). Of them, 51 patients (45%) had no access to further treatments. Of the remaining patients, n = 8 received experimental treatments, and n = 55 received standard platinum-based chemotherapy and were considered for this study. Median duration of chemotherapy was 3 months (95% CI 2–5); the best responses among 53 evaluable patients were observed as follows: 15% partial response/complete response (PR/CR), 40% stable disease (SD), 45% PD. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3 (95% CI 2–5) and 10 (95% CI 6–15) months, respectively. All patients had baseline and follow-up brain radiologic assessments, and n = 23 had brain metastases at the start of chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 13 months, intracranial PD occurred in 47% patients, being the first site of PD in 59% of cases. The median time for intracranial (IC) PD was 2 months (95% CI 2–7). IC PD occurred as oligometastatic in 29%, whereas in 71% of cases, it was associated with systemic PD. Conclusions: Access to subsequent treatments and CNS progression are confirmed unmet needs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Clinical and CNS-specific outcomes in patients receiving standard chemotherapy after the failure of osimertinib are dismal. Novel upfront treatment options with demonstrated prolonged PFS and better CNS outcomes may help address this important issue.
Keywords: EGFR; chemotherapy; brain metastases; central nervous system; NSCLC; osimertinib EGFR; chemotherapy; brain metastases; central nervous system; NSCLC; osimertinib

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Attili, I.; Corvaja, C.; Spitaleri, G.; Trillo Aliaga, P.; Del Signore, E.; Passaro, A.; de Marinis, F. Post-Progression Analysis of EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Following Osimertinib Therapy in Real-World Settings. Cancers 2024, 16, 2589. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16142589

AMA Style

Attili I, Corvaja C, Spitaleri G, Trillo Aliaga P, Del Signore E, Passaro A, de Marinis F. Post-Progression Analysis of EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Following Osimertinib Therapy in Real-World Settings. Cancers. 2024; 16(14):2589. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16142589

Chicago/Turabian Style

Attili, Ilaria, Carla Corvaja, Gianluca Spitaleri, Pamela Trillo Aliaga, Ester Del Signore, Antonio Passaro, and Filippo de Marinis. 2024. "Post-Progression Analysis of EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Following Osimertinib Therapy in Real-World Settings" Cancers 16, no. 14: 2589. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16142589

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop