Next Article in Journal
Role of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy for the Nutrition of Head and Neck Cancer Patients before and up to 6 Months after Cancer Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Review of the Antitumor Properties and Mechanistic Insights of Duocarmycin Analogs
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated Psychological Services in Pediatric Oncology: Caregiver Perspectives at Diagnosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Real-Life Management of FLT3-Mutated AML: Single-Centre Experience over 24 Years
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

WEE1 Inhibitor Adavosertib Exerts Antitumor Effects on Colorectal Cancer, Especially in Cases with p53 Mutations

Cancers 2024, 16(18), 3136; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16183136
by Misa Ariyoshi, Ryo Yuge *, Yuki Kitadai, Daisuke Shimizu, Ryo Miyamoto, Ken Yamashita, Yuichi Hiyama, Hidehiko Takigawa, Yuji Urabe and Shiro Oka
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cancers 2024, 16(18), 3136; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16183136
Submission received: 9 August 2024 / Revised: 6 September 2024 / Accepted: 10 September 2024 / Published: 12 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cancer Therapeutics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In this study, Ariyoshi et al. evaluated the effect of inhibiting WEE1, a protein kinase that regulates the G2/M checkpoint of the cell cycle, in human colon cancer cells lines and CRC mouse models.  From analyzing CRC tumor samples, the authors found that WEE1 positivity is associated with BRAF mutation and MSI-H status, and that patients with WEE1-positive and KRAS mutant CRC have worse overall survival.  In CRC cell lines, the authors looked at the effect of adavosertib on cell proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis.  In orthotopic CRC mouse models, they looked at the effect of adavosertib on tumor size and markers of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tumor immunity.

Overall, the manuscript is well written, and the results are interesting, well presented, and mostly clear.

Specific comments: 

1.     The results of the qPCR (Fig 2a) do not quite match the description in the text (lines 313-315) and so the text should be revised for accuracy.  The authors need to show statistical analysis to determine significant differences in expression between the various cell lines.  Also, what is the source of control RNA = normal human colon mucosa?

 

2.     Statistical analysis is also lacking for cell cycle and apoptosis experiments (Fig 3a-b) and should be provided. Also, HT-29, which has p53 mutation, does not appear to fit the trend of increased % G2/M phase and increased apoptosis (Fig 3a-b), so the authors should comment on that.

 

3.     Revise lines 479-480 in the Discussion for accuracy since ICIs have shown efficacy in a subset of CRC, and are part of standard treatment for advanced or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR tumors.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Article elaborating the role of WEE1 Inhibitor (Adavosertib) Exerting the Antitumor Effects on Colorectal Cancer. This is a well-written manuscript with significant implications in the translational aspect. This research article follows the hypothesis of the work. However, a few things must be addressed before it is ready for acceptance. They are as follows:

1. Fig 5 a-d, all IF figures must be adequately zoomed and shown in this manuscript with better resolution.

2. Authors must add a model depicting the take-home message from this work and discuss it thoroughly by adding a few lines in the conclusion part.

3. It has been shown that WEE1 inhibition induces glutamine addiction (PMID: 31919076), while it has also been shown how oncogenic KRAS regulates cell cycle-regulated checkpoints and glutamine metabolism (PMID: 26682255). 

It is speculative that Adavosertib might play a definitive role in cancer metabolism, more prominently in glutamine metabolism. This would be one of the future directions as a follow-up of this research. Authors must add a few lines discussing this in the introduction by adding mentioned relevant works. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

All concerns addressed and ready for acceptance. 

Back to TopTop